Evidence of an estrogen receptor form devoid of estrogen binding ability in MCF-7 cells

In MCF-7 breast cancer cells, hydroxytamoxifen (OH-Tam) up-regulates the estrogen receptor (ER) in a form unable to bind [(3)H]estradiol (E(2)). We show here that this property is not restricted to this antiestrogen. [(3)H]E(2) binding assays (whole cell assays, DCC assays on cell extracts) and enzyme immunoassays (Abbott) performed in parallel, establish the permanent presence of such unusual ERs in the absence of any exposure of the cells to a ligand. E(2) and the pure antiestrogen RU 58 668, which down-regulate ER, also decrease [(3)H]E(2) binding. In control cells, these ERs represent about the half of the whole receptor population; they also display a tendency to stabilize within the cell nucleus. Loss of E(2) binding ability appears irreversible, since we failed to label receptor accumulated under OH-Tam with [(3)H]E(2) or [(3)H]tamoxifen aziridine (TAZ). Cycloheximide (CHX), which blocks E(2)-induced down regulation of ER, failed to stabilize [(3)H]E(2) binding (whole cell assay) after an [(3)H]E(2) pulse (1 h), confirming that regulation of E(2) binding and peptide level are related to different regulatory mechanisms. Loss of binding ability could not be ascribed to any ER cleavage as demonstrated by Western blotting with a panel of ER antibodies raised against its various domains (67 kDa ER solely detected). We propose that loss of E(2) binding ability is related to the aging process of the receptor, i.e. it is progressively converted to a form devoted to degradation after it has accomplished its physiological role. Ligands may favor (E(2), RU 58 668) or impede (OH-Tam) this elimination process.     

Mechanisms governing the accumulation of estrogen receptor alpha in MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with hydroxytamoxifen and related antiestrogens

This study aimed at a better understanding of estrogen receptor alpha (ER) up regulation induced by partial estrogen antagonists. Effect of treatment with hydroxytamoxifen (OH-Tam) on ER level in MCF-7 cells was investigated by an approach combining ER measurement (enzyme immunoassay) and morphological demonstration (immunofluorescence). Furthermore, the influence of drug exposure on the rates of ER synthesis and degradation was assessed by determining [35S]methionine incorporated into the receptor in different experimental conditions (measurement of synthesis or pulse-chase experiments). ER up regulation was already induced by a 1-h pulse treatment with OH-Tam, thus a continuous exposure was not required. This process appeared reversible (i.e. ER accumulation due to OH-Tam rapidly vanished upon subsequent exposure to 17beta-estradiol (E2) or the pure antiestrogen RU 58668). While OH-Tam did not affect the rate of [35S]methionine incorporation into ER, it clearly caused an impairment of ER degradation (pulse-chase experiments) indicating that up regulation results from a stabilization of the receptor associated with the maintenance of its synthesis. Various tamoxifen derivatives, as well as a few related partial antiestrogens, were compared on the basis of binding ability and propensity to induce ER up regulation. A close relationship was found between both properties. Structure-activity analysis revealed that the capacity of these compounds to induce ER up regulation is associated with characteristics of their aminoalkyle side-chain, similar to those required for antiestrogenicity.     

Role of estrogen receptors and antiestrogen binding sites in an early effect of antiestrogens, the inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis

The effects of estradiol (E2), 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (OH-Tam), and LY117018 on cholesterogenesis were investigated in two human breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and BT20), and in rat hepatoma (HTC) and fibroblastic (NRK-49F) cell lines. It was found that 10(-10) M E2 stimulated and 10(-8) M OH-Tam inhibited cholesterol synthesis in the estrogen-sensitive MCF-7 cell line. The OH-Tam effect occurred in less than 15 min whereas E2 only stimulated after 8 h. The inhibition of cholesterol synthesis was not reversed by E2. E2 was without effect in the HTC and estrogen-resistant BT20 cell lines whereas OH-Tam was as effective as in the MCF-7 cells. LY117018 had nearly as much effect on cholesterol synthesis as OH-Tam, in both MCF-7 and BT20 cells. Neither E2 nor OH-Tam had any effect on the NRK-49F cell line, even at micromolar concentrations. The three lines (MCF-7, BT20, HTC), whose cholesterol synthesis has been shown to be OH-Tam sensitive, appeared to contain high-affinity antiestrogen binding sites (AEBS); since the OH-Tam-resistant line (NRK) only contained low-affinity AEBS, there appears to be some relationship between OH-Tam sensitivity and high-affinity AEBS content. This suggests that the cholesterogenesis inhibition induced by antiestrogens is ER-independent and may involve AEBS. The cholesterogenesis stimulation induced by E2 occurred via a different pathway that appears to be related to the presence of ER in the cells.     

Accumulation of a non-binding form of estrogen receptor in MCF-7 cells under hydroxytamoxifen treatment

It is well known that MCF-7 cells, when incubated with hydroxytamoxifen (OH-Tam) loose their capacity to bind [³H]estradiol. By using Western blotting and [³H]tamoxifen aziridine labeling of KCl extracts from these cells we found that this loss in binding capacity was not associated with a disappearance of the estrogen receptor (ER) protein, an event known to occur after incubation with estradiol. Attempts to label under exchange conditions these ER molecules, which, on the basis of enzyme immunoassays appear to accumulate under OH-Tam treatment, were unsuccessful. Cell fractionation suggested that their origin is nuclear. Assessment of a few triphenylethylenic antiestrogens, as far as their inhibitory potency towards the in vitro MCF-7 cell growth is concerned, indicated a correlation between accumulation of these non-binding ER molecules and the antiestrogen antiproliferative action. However, we were unable to demonstrate absence of such an ER accumulation in two tamoxifen-resistant variants. Impaired folding of the ER protein or impaired phosphorylation of its hormone-binding domain are attractive hypotheses to account for these non-binding ER molecules. Whether these ER molecules have any physiological role, such as competition with the “normal” receptor molecules for the estrogen responsive elements on the DNA is unknown and deserves further study.     

Mechanisms of 4-hydroxytamoxifen anti-growth factor activity in breast cancer cells: alterations of growth factor receptor binding sites and tyrosine kinase activity

We previously demonstrated that antiestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen (OH-Tam) blocks the mitogenic activity of growth factors in breast cancer. We now investigate this mechanism by evaluating how OH-Tam affects growth factor binding and receptor tyrosine kinase activity. We show here that OH-Tam has an opposite effect on epidermal growth factor (EGF) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) binding in estrogen receptor (ER) positive cells. A decrease in IGF-1 binding sites may explain the reduced IGF-I mitogenic effect, whereas an increase in high affinity EGF binding associated with a decrease in in vitro receptor autophosphorylation rather favors the possibility of an alteration in EGF receptor tyrosine kinase activity. We conclude that OH-Tam may prevent growth factor action in ER+ cells both by modulating the concentration of growth factor binding sites and by altering growth factor receptor functionality.     

Implication of proteasome in estrogen receptor degradation

In MCF-7 breast cancer cells, estradiol (E2) and pure antiestrogen RU 58668 down-regulate the estrogen receptor (ER). Interestingly, the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) abrogated solely the effect of E2 suggesting a selective difference in the degradation of the receptor induced by estrogenic and antiestrogenic stimulations. A panel of lysosome inhibitors (i.e. bafilomycin, chloroquine, NH4Cl, and monensin), calpain inhibitors (calpastatin and PD 150606) and proteasome inhibitors (lactacystin and proteasome inhibitor I) were tested to assess this hypothesis. Among all inhibitors tested, lactacystin and proteasome inhibitor I were the sole inhibitors to abrogate the elimination of the receptor induced by both E2 and RU 58668; this selective effect was also recorded in cells prelabeled with [3H]tamoxifen aziridine before exposure to these ligands. Hence, differential sensitivity to CHX seems to be linked to the different mechanisms which target proteins for proteasome-mediated destruction. Moreover, the two tested proteasome inhibitors produced a slight increase of ER concentration in cells not exposed to any ligand, suggesting also the involvement of proteasome in receptor turnover.     

Demonstration of estrogen receptors and of estrogen responsiveness in the HKT-1097 cell line derived from diethylstilbestrol-induced kidney tumors

Summary This study was undertaken in order to examine the estrogen sensitivity of HKT-1097, an established cell line recently derived from diethylstilbestrol (DES)-induced kidney tumors in Syrian hamsters. Estrogen receptor (ER) level in HKT-1097, determined by enzyme-linked immunoassay, was 67 fmol/mg protein, i.e., a value approx. 30% lower than that found in Syrian hamster kidney tumors. ER immunostaining in cells fixed with Carnoy's mixture, as well as ER demonstration by Western blotting, suggested DES-induced nuclear translocation or stabilization of the receptor within the nucleus. Kinetic parameters of estrogen binding to ER in HKT-1097 cells were 8.4×10⁻¹¹ M and 60.8 fmol/mg protein for K _d and B_max, respectively. The K _d of estrogen binding to ER in HKT-1097 was close to that evaluated for the receptor in breast cancer-derived MCF-7 cell line, whereas the B_max value was approx. seven times lower in HKT-1097 as compared to MCF-7. In HKT-1097 cells, antiestrogens ICI 182,780 and RU 58,668 induced ER downregulation and competed with estrogen binding to the receptor. As demonstrated by Western blot analysis, DES exposure led to an increased expression of progesterone receptor (PgR) in HKT-1097 cells. Addition of DES to estrogen-free medium produced a stimulation of growth in both HKT-1097 and MCF-7 cells, but the mitogenic effect was less marked for HKT-1097. Despite the fact that ICI 182,780 and RU 58,668 clearly interact with HKT-1097 cell ER, they appeared unable to suppress DES-induced stimulation of growth and increase of PgR expression.     

Identification of the functional domain of glucocorticoid receptor involved in RU486 antagonism

Mifepristone, also known as RU486, is a potent glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist that inhibits GR-mediated transactivation. As an alternative to existing antidepressants, RU486 has been shown to rapidly reverse psychotic depression, most likely by blocking GR. Although a number of studies have demonstrated RU486-induced GR antagonism, the precise mechanism of action still remains unclear. To identify the GR domain involved in RU486-induced suppression, GR transactivation and nuclear translocation were examined using cells transfected with human GR (hGR), Guyanese squirrel monkey GR (gsmGR), and GR chimeras into COS-1 cells. RU486 showed a much more potent suppressive effect in gsmGR-expressing cells versus hGR-expressing cells, without significant cortisol- or RU486-induced changes in nuclear translocation. A GR chimera containing the gsmGR AF1 domain (amino acids 132–428) showed a marked decrease in luciferase activity, suggesting that this domain plays an important role in RU486-induced GR antagonism. Furthermore, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis indicated that, in the presence of RU486, gsmGR AF1 domain contributes to GR mobility in living COS-1 cells. Taken together, these results demonstrate, for the first time, that the antagonistic effects of RU486 on GR transactivation involve a specific GR domain.     

The inhibition of prolactin synthesis in GH3 rat pituitary tumor cells by monohydroxytamoxifen is associated with changes in the properties of the estrogen receptor

E2 (1 nM) stimulated the synthesis of PRL in GH3 cells. OH TAM (100 nM) did not affect basal PRL synthesis, but completely inhibited the increase produced by 1 nM E2. [3H]E2 and [3H]OH TAM both bound to the cytosolic 8S ER and these were split into 4S subunits on sucrose gradients containing 0.4 M KCl. By comparison, ER complexes extracted from nuclei of GH3 cells cultured in media containing [3H]E2 or [3H]OH TAM both sedimented at 5S on sucrose gradients containing 0.4 M KCl. Both 4S and 5S ER complexes were recognized by the monoclonal antibody D547 which increased their sedimentation coefficients to 8-9S. In contrast, a polyclonal antibody raised to calf uterine ER in the goat, interacted with the cytosolic ER so that the binding of [3H]E2 was inhibited but the binding of [3]OH TAM was only slightly reduced. A molecular model is proposed to describe the binding of E2 and OH TAM to the ER that might contribute to an understanding of estrogen and antiestrogen action.     

Estrogen-mediated suppression of cytochrome P4501A (CYP1A) expression in rainbow trout hepatocytes: role of estrogen receptor.

Hepatic CYP1A expression in fish can be modulated by the female sex hormone, 17beta-estradiol (E2), however neither the mechanism of E2 suppression of CYP1A nor the capacity for hormonal regulation to overcome CYP1A induction by xenobiotics are known. The present study investigates for the first time in fish if the estrogen receptor (ER) is involved in the suppressive action of E2 on CYP1A gene expression. The study further examines, if the E2 effect is able to overcome xenobiotic induction of CYP1A. As experimental model, in vitro cultures of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, hepatocytes were used. The effect of E2 on CYP1A was assessed by measuring the CYP1A-associated 7-ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) enzyme activity, and CYP1A mRNA contents. E2 at non-cytotoxic concentrations caused a significant time- and concentration-dependent decline of basal but not of induced hepatic EROD activities. The inhibitory action of E2 on basal CYP1A was also evident at the mRNA level. The presence of the ER antagonist tamoxifen abolished the inhibitory action of E2 on CYP1A expression. The results from these in vitro experiments provide evidence (a) that the ER is involved in the suppressive action of E2 on CYP1A, and (b) that E2 inhibitory action does not overcome xenobiotic induction of CYP1A.