Base Flipping in V(D)J Recombination: Insights into the Mechanism of Hairpin Formation,the 12/23 Rule,and the Coordination of Double-Strand Breaks

Tn5 transposase cleaves the transposon end using a hairpin intermediate on the transposon end. This involves a flipped base that is stacked against a tryptophan residue in the protein. However, many other members of the cut-and-paste transposase family, including the RAG1 protein, produce a hairpin on the flanking DNA. We have investigated the reversed polarity of the reaction for RAG recombination. Although the RAG proteins appear to employ a base-flipping mechanism using aromatic residues, the putatively flipped base is not at the expected location and does not appear to stack against any of the said aromatic residues. We propose an alternative model in which a flipped base is accommodated in a nonspecific pocket or cleft within the recombinase. This is consistent with the location of the flipped base at position −1 in the coding flank, which can be occupied by purine or pyrimidine bases that would be difficult to stabilize using a single, highly specific, interaction. Finally, during this work we noticed that the putative base-flipping events on either side of the 12/23 recombination signal sequence paired complex are coupled to the nicking steps and serve to coordinate the double-strand breaks on either side of the complex.Antibody and T-cell receptor (TCR) diversity is generated by V(D)J recombination initiated by the RAG proteins, RAG1 and RAG2. The recombination signal sequences (RSSs), where recombination takes place, have a distinctive arrangement resembling transposon ends. The relationship between V(D)J recombination and transposition was established beyond doubt by the discovery of RAG-mediated transposition and by the identification of a triad of conserved active-site residues. This evidence placed RAG1 firmly within the family of transposases and retroviral integrases that have a characteristic DDE triad of amino acid residues that coordinate catalytic metal ions in the active site (1, 26, 30, 35, 39, 46). Later, the Transib family of transposons was identified as the likely ancestral group of RAG1 (33).In V(D)J recombination, the RAG proteins excise the DNA between a pair of RSSs. This fragment is the equivalent of an excised transposon, and it takes no further part in the canonical V(D)J recombination reaction. Instead, the variable regions of the genes encoding antibodies and TCR are created by the imprecise rejoining of the flanking DNA, referred to as the “coding flank.” A key feature of the cleaved coding flanks is that they have covalently closed hairpin ends. The asymmetric resolution of these hairpins contributes to the diversification of the coding sequences during rejoining. The hairpins themselves arise as a consequence of the molecular mechanism RAG-mediated RSS cleavage.The crystal structure for the catalytic core of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase protein revealed a structural fold shared in common with RNase H and the Holliday junction resolving enzyme RuvC (22). RNase H and RuvC monomers each perform a simple nicking reaction that requires a single phosphoryl transfer event. Cut-and-paste transposition, which requires at least three phosphoryl transfer steps at each transposon end, therefore presents a mechanistic challenge. One solution to this challenge was revealed by the discovery of the DNA-hairpin cleavage-intermediate in V(D)J recombination and Tn10 transposition (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (34, 57). However, it is interesting to note that the existence of this intermediate was first suggested by Coen and colleagues on the basis of the genomic scars produced by excision of the hAT family transposon Tam3 in Antirrhinum majus (14).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Hairpin-processing reactions of opposite polarity. Most prokaryotic and eukaryotic members of the DDE family have hairpin intermediates of opposite polarity. In this paper, we refer to the two strands of DNA as “first strand” or “second strand” depending on the order of cleavage. The first strand therefore corresponds to the transferred and nontransferred strands of the prokaryotic and eukaryotic elements, respectively. Scissile phosphates are in red. The transposon end and RSS are shown as gray triangles. (Left panel) In Tn5 and Tn10, the first step of the reaction is a nick on the bottom (first) strand that exposes the 3′-OH at the end of the transposon. The second strand is cleaved by a direct transesterification reaction, which generates a “proximal-hairpin” intermediate on the transposon end (5, 34). Resolution by a nick at the tip of the hairpin yields a blunt transposon end. Distortion of the DNA helix can be detected by permanganate sensitivity of the T−1 and T+2 residues on the second strand. The insert shows the crystal structure of the Tn5 transposon end, highlighting the flipped base at position +2 (19). Two tryptophan residues are also shown. One acts as a “wedge” or “probe” residue inserted into the DNA helix, while the other provides stacking interactions that stabilize the flipped base. The W323 probe residue resides within the catalytic core close to the DDE residue E326, whereas the W298 stacking residue is in the inserted subdomain (see text for further details). Base flipping takes place after the first nick and is probably maintained for all subsequent steps, including integration (3, 7). (Right panel) In V(D)J recombination and the hAT family of transposons, the polarity of the reaction is reversed. The first nick is on the top strand providing a 3′-OH group on the flanking DNA (53, 71, 77). Transesterification yields a “distal hairpin” intermediate on the flanking DNA that is processed by the host. The positions of relevant thymidine residues in our substrates are indicated.All DDE family transposases, including RAG1, cut the DNA to expose the 3′-OH at the end of the element (or RSS). However, the fate of the opposite strand and the order of strand cleavage events vary within the group (reviewed in references13, 18, and 55). Some enzymes, such as the retroviral integrases and the bacteriophage Mu transposase, nick and integrate the 3′-OH directly without second-strand cleavage. The cut-and-paste transposons, which cleave both strands of DNA, can be divided into two groups. With some notable exceptions such as the piggyBac element, most prokaryotic family members cleave the bottom strand of the recombination site first, whereas most eukaryotic members cleave the top strand first (8, 10, 20, 41, 47, 48, 77). For those family members with a hairpin mechanism, the inverted polarity of the first step dictates the reversal of all subsequent steps (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). In consequence, most eukaryotic members of the family can achieve transposition with one less phosphoryl transfer reaction than the prokaryotic members, which are obliged to resolve the hairpin intermediate. The eukaryotic members can simply release the hairpin ends or, as in the case of RAG, hand them on to host factors for further processing (40).Insight into the hairpin mechanism was provided by a crystal structure for the Tn5 transpososome, in which the penultimate base on the second, nontransferred, strand was flipped from the helix and stacked against a tryptophan side chain in the protein (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (19). The flipped base seemed to provide the steric freedom that is presumed to be required for making and resolving the hairpin intermediate. Two groups searched for a residue in RAG1 that performs a function equivalent to the stacking tryptophan in the Tn5 transposase (27, 45). This work identified several candidate residues on the basis of their respective mechanistic defects and their rescue by modified DNA substrates.Here we have further assessed the candidate stacking residues using biochemical techniques previously used to study the dynamics of base flipping in Tn5 and Tn10 transposition (6, 7). We have identified a distortion at position −1 of the V(D)J coding flank DNA. It is introduced after the first nick at the RSS and is therefore reminiscent of the flipped base at the end of Tn5. The distortion is perfectly correlated with the ability of wild-type and mutant RAG-RSS complexes to perform the hairpin step of the reaction. We conclude that this base is probably equivalent to the flipped base in Tn5. However, none of the candidate aromatic residues seems to fulfill the function of the putative stacking tryptophan residue. We therefore propose a model in which base flipping in RAG recombination is significantly different from that in Tn5 transposition.Canonical V(D)J recombination occurs within a 12/23 RSS paired complex (24, 36, 60, 72, 73). This restriction is known as the 12/23 rule. More recently a further restriction, the so-called “beyond 12/23” (B12/23) rule has been proposed to explain the exclusion of direct Vβ-to-Jβ joining in the TCR β region, despite the presence of appropriately oriented pairs of 12 and 23 RSSs (4, 21, 31, 32).Little is known of the mechanisms that enforce the 12/23 rule or coordinate cleavage on either side of the complex. However, during this work, we observed that the coding flank distortion was coupled on either side of a 12/23 RSS paired complex: the distortion of a nicked coding flank is suppressed by an unnicked partner. We present a model and discuss the biological significance of this conformational coupling and its relevance to the B12/23 rule.     

Footprint Analysis of the RAG Protein Recombination Signal Sequence Complex for V(D)J Type Recombination

We have studied the interaction between recombination signal sequences (RSSs) and protein products of the truncated forms of recombination-activating genes (RAG) by gel mobility shift, DNase I footprinting, and methylation interference assays. Methylation interference with dimethyl sulfate demonstrated that binding was blocked by methylation in the nonamer at the second-position G residue in the bottom strand and at the sixth- and seventh-position A residues in the top strand. DNase I footprinting experiments demonstrated that RAG1 alone, or even a RAG1 homeodomain peptide, gave footprint patterns very similar to those obtained with the RAG1-RAG2 complex. In the heptamer, partial methylation interference was observed at the sixth-position A residue in the bottom strand. In DNase I footprinting, the heptamer region was weakly protected in the bottom strand by RAG1. The effects of RSS mutations on RAG binding were evaluated by DNA footprinting. Comparison of the RAG-RSS footprint data with the published Hin model confirmed the notion that sequence-specific RSS-RAG interaction takes place primarily between the Hin domain of the RAG1 protein and adjacent major and minor grooves of the nonamer DNA.     

染色体重构与免疫球蛋白的V(D)J重组

免疫球蛋白是由B细胞合成、分泌的．它的可变区特异结合抗原,恒定区发挥免疫球蛋白的生物学功能,介导体液免疫反应。编码免疫球蛋白可变区的V、D、J基因片段互相分开、以胚系形式存在。在B细胞发育过程中．胚系基因片段通过DNA重组相连,组装成育转录活性单位。V(D)J重组是严格调控的。其中,B细胞染色体的乙酰化修饰,引起局部染色体的结构改变是一重要机制。     

Fine structure and activity of discrete RAG-HMG complexes on V(D)J recombination signals

Two lymphoid cell-specific proteins, RAG-1 and RAG-2, initiate V(D)J recombination by introducing DNA breaks at recombination signal sequences (RSSs). Although the RAG proteins themselves bind and cleave DNA substrates containing either a 12-RSS or a 23-RSS, DNA-bending proteins HMG-1 and HMG-2 are known to promote these processes, particularly with 23-RSS substrates. Using in-gel cleavage assays and DNA footprinting techniques, I analyzed the catalytic activity and protein-DNA contacts in discrete 12-RSS and 23-RSS complexes containing the RAG proteins and either HMG-1 or HMG-2. I found that both the cleavage activity and the pattern of protein-DNA contacts in RAG-HMG complexes assembled on 12-RSS substrates closely resembled those obtained from analogous 12-RSS complexes lacking HMG protein. In contrast, 23-RSS complexes containing both RAG proteins and either HMG-1 or HMG-2 exhibited enhanced cleavage activity and displayed an altered distribution of cleavage products compared to 23-RSS complexes containing only RAG-1 and RAG-2. Moreover, HMG-dependent heptamer contacts in 23-RSS complexes were observed. The protein-DNA contacts in RAG-RSS-HMG complexes assembled on 12-RSS or 23-RSS substrates were strikingly similar at comparable positions, suggesting that the RAG proteins mediate HMG-dependent heptamer contacts in 23-RSS complexes. Results of ethylation interference experiments suggest that the HMG protein is positioned 5' of the nonamer in 23-RSS complexes, interacting largely with the side of the duplex opposite the one contacting the RAG proteins. Thus, HMG protein plays the dual role of bringing critical elements of the 23-RSS heptamer into the same phase as the 12-RSS to promote RAG binding and assisting in the catalysis of 23-RSS cleavage.     

The beyond 12/23 restriction is imposed at the nicking and pairing steps of DNA cleavage during V(D)J recombination

The beyond 12/23 (B12/23) rule ensures inclusion of a Dbeta gene segment in the assembled T-cell receptor (TCR) beta variable region exon and is manifest by a failure of direct Vbeta-to-Jbeta gene segment joining. The restriction is enforced during the DNA cleavage step of V(D)J recombination by the recombination-activating gene 1 and 2 (RAG1/2) proteins and the recombination signal sequences (RSSs) flanking the TCRbeta gene segments. Nothing is known about the step(s) at which DNA cleavage is defective or how TCRbeta locus sequences contribute to these defects. To address this, we examined the steps of DNA cleavage by the RAG proteins using TCRbeta locus V, D, and J RSS oligonucleotide substrates. The results demonstrate that the B12/23 rule is enforced through slow nicking of Jbeta substrates and to some extent through poor synapsis of Vbeta and Jbeta substrates. Nicking is controlled largely by the coding flank and, unexpectedly, the RSS spacer, while synapsis is controlled primarily by the RSS nonamer. The results demonstrate that different Jbeta substrates are crippled at different steps of cleavage by distinct combinations of defects in the various DNA elements and strongly suggest that the DNA nicking step of V(D)J recombination can be rate limiting in vivo.     

A RAG1 and RAG2 Tetramer Complex Is Active in Cleavage in V(D)J Recombination

During V(D)J recombination two proteins, RAG1 and RAG2, assemble as a protein-DNA complex with the appropriate DNA targets containing recombination signal sequences (RSSs). The properties of this complex require a fairly elaborate set of protein-protein and protein-DNA contacts. Here we show that a purified derivative of RAG1, without DNA, exists predominantly as a homodimer. A RAG2 derivative alone has monomer, dimer, and larger forms. The coexpressed RAG1 and RAG2 proteins form a mixed tetramer in solution which contains two molecules of each protein. The same tetramer of RAG1 and RAG2 plus one DNA molecule is the form active in cleavage. Additionally, we show that both DNA products following cleavage can still be held together in a stable protein-DNA complex.     

Recombination centres and the orchestration of V(D)J recombination

The initiation of V(D)J recombination by the recombination activating gene 1 (RAG1) and RAG2 proteins is carefully orchestrated to ensure that antigen receptor gene assembly occurs in the appropriate cell lineage and in the proper developmental order. Here we review recent advances in our understanding of how DNA binding and cleavage by the RAG proteins are regulated by the chromatin structure and architecture of antigen receptor genes. These advances suggest novel mechanisms for both the targeting and the mistargeting of V(D)J recombination, and have implications for how these events contribute to genome instability and lymphoid malignancy.     

抗原受体基因重组的表观遗传学调控研究新进展

淋巴细胞是哺乳动物唯一能发生体细胞基因组变化的一类细胞,淋巴细胞在发育过程中通过V(D)J重组获得成熟的特异的抗原受体基因,实现了免疫细胞抗原识别惊人的多样性.关于V(D)J重组的调控机制一直是免疫学研究的重要问题,然而直到将表观遗传学研究引入这一领域,综合遗传学和表观遗传学的研究才真正揭示V(D)J重组精细的调控机制.综述了新近发现的V(D)J重组过程中重要的表观遗传学调控机制,如CpG甲基化,组蛋白修饰,核小体重塑及核拓扑学变化.     

Functional Analysis of Coordinated Cleavage in V(D)J Recombination

V(D)J recombination in vivo requires a pair of signals with distinct spacer elements of 12 and 23 bp that separate conserved heptamer and nonamer motifs. Cleavage in vitro by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins can occur at individual signals when the reaction buffer contains Mn²⁺, but cleavage is restricted to substrates containing two signals when Mg²⁺ is the divalent cation. By using a novel V(D)J cleavage substrate, we show that while the RAG proteins alone establish a moderate preference for a 12/23 pair versus a 12/12 pair, a much stricter dependence of cleavage on the 12/23 signal pair is produced by the inclusion of HMG1 and competitor double-stranded DNA. The competitor DNA serves to inhibit the cleavage of substrates carrying a 12/12 or 23/23 pair, as well as the cutting at individual signals in 12/23 substrates. We show that a 23/33 pair is more efficiently recombined than a 12/33 pair, suggesting that the 12/23 rule can be generalized to a requirement for spacers that differ from each other by a single helical turn. Furthermore, we suggest that a fixed spatial orientation of signals is required for cleavage. In general, the same signal variants that can be cleaved singly can function under conditions in which a signal pair is required. However, a chemically modified substrate with one noncleavable signal enables us to show that formation of a functional cleavage complex is mechanistically separable from the cleavage reaction itself and that although cleavage requires a pair of signals, cutting does not have to occur simultaneously at both. The implications of these results are discussed with respect to the mechanism of V(D)J recombination and the generation of chromosomal translocations.     

Footprint analysis of recombination signal sequences in the 12/23 synaptic complex of V(D)J recombination

In V(D)J joining of antigen receptor genes, two recombination signal sequences (RSSs), 12-RSS and 23-RSS, are paired and complexed with the protein products of recombination-activating genes RAG1 and RAG2. Using magnetic beads, we purified the pre- and postcleavage complexes of V(D)J joining and analyzed them by DNase I footprinting. In the precleavage synaptic complex, strong protection was seen not only in the 9-mer and spacer regions but also near the coding border of the 7-mer. This is a sharp contrast to the single RSS-RAG complex where the 9-mer plays a major role in the interaction. We also analyzed the postcleavage signal end complex by footprinting. Unlike what was seen with the precleavage complex, the entire 7-mer and its neighboring spacer regions were protected. The present study indicates that the RAG-RSS interaction in the 7-mer region drastically changes once the synaptic complex is formed for cleavage.     

VDJSeq-Solver: In Silico V(D)J Recombination Detection Tool

In this paper we present VDJSeq-Solver, a methodology and tool to identify clonal lymphocyte populations from paired-end RNA Sequencing reads derived from the sequencing of mRNA neoplastic cells. The tool detects the main clone that characterises the tissue of interest by recognizing the most abundant V(D)J rearrangement among the existing ones in the sample under study. The exact sequence of the clone identified is capable of accounting for the modifications introduced by the enzymatic processes. The proposed tool overcomes limitations of currently available lymphocyte rearrangements recognition methods, working on a single sequence at a time, that are not applicable to high-throughput sequencing data. In this work, VDJSeq-Solver has been applied to correctly detect the main clone and identify its sequence on five Mantle Cell Lymphoma samples; then the tool has been tested on twelve Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma samples. In order to comply with the privacy, ethics and intellectual property policies of the University Hospital and the University of Verona, data is available upon request to ti.rvinu.oeneta@itnetu.otroppus after signing a mandatory Materials Transfer Agreement. VDJSeq-Solver JAVA/Perl/Bash software implementation is free and available at http://eda.polito.it/VDJSeq-Solver/.     

Nicking is asynchronous and stimulated by synapsis in 12/23 rule-regulated V(D)J cleavage.

The first step in DNA cleavage at V(D)J recombination signals by RAG1 and RAG2 is creation of a nick at the heptamer/coding flank border. Under proper conditions in vitro the second step, hairpin formation, requires two signals with spacers of 12 and 23 bp, a restriction referred to as the 12/23 rule. Under these conditions hairpin formation occurs at the two signals at or near the same time. In contrast, we find that under the same conditions nicking occurs at isolated signals and hence is not subject to the 12/23 rule. With two signals the nicking events are not concerted and the signal with a 12 bp spacer is usually nicked first. However, the extent and rate of nicking at a given signal are diminished by mutations of the other signal. The appearance of DNA nicked at both signals is stimulated by more than an order of magnitude by the ability of the signals to synapse, indicating that synapsis accelerates nicking and often precedes it. These observations allow formulation of a more complete model of catalysis of DNA cleavage and how the 12/23 rule is enforced.     

A RAG-1/RAG-2 tetramer supports 12/23-regulated synapsis,cleavage, and transposition of V(D)J recombination signals

Initiation of V(D)J recombination involves the synapsis and cleavage of a 12/23 pair of recombination signal sequences by RAG-1 and RAG-2. Ubiquitous nonspecific DNA-bending factors of the HMG box family, such as HMG-1, are known to assist in these processes. After cleavage, the RAG proteins remain bound to the cut signal ends and, at least in vitro, support the integration of these ends into unrelated target DNA via a transposition-like mechanism. To investigate whether the protein complex supporting synapsis, cleavage, and transposition of V(D)J recombination signals utilized the same complement of RAG and HMG proteins, I compared the RAG protein stoichiometries and activities of discrete protein-DNA complexes assembled on intact, prenicked, or precleaved recombination signal sequence (RSS) substrates in the absence and presence of HMG-1. In the absence of HMG-1, I found that two discrete RAG-1/RAG-2 complexes are detected by mobility shift assay on all RSS substrates tested. Both contain dimeric RAG-1 and either one or two RAG-2 subunits. The addition of HMG-1 supershifts both complexes without altering the RAG protein stoichiometry. I find that 12/23-regulated recombination signal synapsis and cleavage are only supported in a protein-DNA complex containing HMG-1 and a RAG-1/RAG-2 tetramer. Interestingly, the RAG-1/RAG-2 tetramer also supports transposition, but HMG-1 is dispensable for its activity.     

Distinct Roles of RAG1 and RAG2 in Binding the V(D)J Recombination Signal Sequences

The RAG1 and RAG2 proteins initiate V(D)J recombination by introducing double-strand breaks at the border between a recombination signal sequence (RSS) and a coding segment. To understand the distinct functions of RAG1 and RAG2 in signal recognition, we have compared the DNA binding activities of RAG1 alone and RAG1 plus RAG2 by gel retardation and footprinting analyses. RAG1 exhibits only a three- to fivefold preference for binding DNA containing an RSS over random sequence DNA. Although direct binding of RAG2 by itself was not detected, the presence of both RAG1 and RAG2 results in the formation of a RAG1-RAG2-DNA complex which is more stable and more specific than the RAG1-DNA complex and is active in V(D)J cleavage. These results suggest that biologically effective discrimination between an RSS and nonspecific sequences requires both RAG1 and RAG2. Unlike the binding of RAG1 plus RAG2, RAG1 can bind to DNA in the absence of a divalent metal ion and does not require the presence of coding flank sequence. Footprinting of the RAG1-RAG2 complex with 1,10-phenanthroline-copper and dimethyl sulfate protection reveal that both the heptamer and the nonamer are involved. The nonamer is protected, with extensive protein contacts within the minor groove. Conversely, the heptamer is rendered more accessible to chemical attack, suggesting that binding of RAG1 plus RAG2 distorts the DNA near the coding/signal border.     

Structure of Nonhairpin Coding-End DNA Breaks in Cells Undergoing V(D)J Recombination

The V(D)J recombinase recognizes a pair of immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor gene segments flanked by recombination signal sequences and introduces double-strand breaks, generating two signal ends and two coding ends. Broken coding ends were initially identified as covalently closed hairpin DNA molecules. Before recombination, however, the hairpins must be opened and the ends must be modified by nuclease digestion and N-region addition. We have now analyzed nonhairpin coding ends associated with various immunoglobulin gene segments in cells undergoing V(D)J recombination. We found that these broken DNA ends have different nonrandom 5′-strand deletions which were characteristic for each locus examined. These deletions correlate well with the sequence characteristics of coding joints involving these gene segments. In addition, unlike broken signal ends, these nonhairpin coding-end V(D)J recombination reaction intermediates have 3′ overhanging ends. We discuss the implications of these results for models of how sequence modifications occur during coding-joint formation.     

No Requirement for V(D)J Recombination in p53-Deficient Thymic Lymphoma

The p53 tumor suppressor is activated in response to a variety of cellular stress signals, although specific in vivo signals that trigger tumor suppression are unknown. In mouse thymocytes, where p53 inactivation leads to tumorigenesis, several observations suggest that V(D)J recombination of T-cell receptor (TCR) loci could provide a DNA damage signal triggering p53-dependent apoptosis and tumor suppression. Inactivation of p53 would allow V(D)J driven mutation of additional cancer genes, facilitating tumorigenesis. Here, we show that mice with a p53 deficiency in thymocytes and unable to carry out V(D)J recombination are not impaired in the development of thymoma. Recombination-activating gene (RAG) deficiencies were introduced into both p53^−/− mice and TgTΔN transgenic mice, a strain in which 100% of the mice develop thymoma due to thymocyte-specific inactivation of p53 by a simian virus 40 T-antigen variant. V(D)J recombination was dispensable for tumorigenesis since thymomas developed with or without the RAG-1 or RAG-2 gene, although some delay was observed. When V(D)J recombination was suppressed by expression of rearranged TCR transgenes, 100% of the TgTΔN mice developed thymoma, surprisingly with reduced latency. Further introduction of a RAG deficiency into these mice had no impact on the timing or frequency of tumorigenesis. Finally, karyotype and chromosome painting analyses showed no evidence for TCR gene translocations in p53-deficient thymomas, although abundant aneuploidy involving frequent duplication of certain chromosomes was present. Thus, contrary to the current hypothesis, these studies indicate that signals other than V(D)J recombination promote p53 tumor suppression in thymocytes and that the mechanism of tumorigenesis is distinct from TCR translocation oncogene activation.     

The V(D)J recombination activating gene, RAG-1

The RAG-1 (recombination activating gene-1) genomic locus, which activates V(D)J recombination when introduced into NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, was isolated by serial genomic transfections of oligonucleotide-tagged DNA. A genomic walk spanning 55 kb yielded a RAG-1 genomic probe that detects a single 6.6-7.0 kb mRNA species in transfectants and pre-B and pre-T cells. RAG-1 genomic and cDNA clones were biologically active when introduced into NIH 3T3 cells. Nucleotide sequencing of human and mouse RAG-1 cDNA clones predicts 119 kd proteins of 1043 and 1040 amino acids, respectively, with 90% sequence identity. RAG-1 has been conserved between species that carry out V(D)J recombination, and its pattern of expression correlates exactly with the pattern of expression of V(D)J recombinase activity. RAG-1 may activate V(D)J recombination indirectly, or it may encode the V(D)J recombinase itself.     

The architecture of the 12RSS in V(D)J recombination signal and synaptic complexes

V(D)J recombination is initiated by RAG1 and RAG2, which together with HMGB1 bind to a recombination signal sequence (12RSS or 23RSS) to form the signal complex (SC) and then capture a complementary partner RSS, yielding the paired complex (PC). Little is known regarding the structural changes that accompany the SC to PC transition or the structural features that allow RAG to distinguish its two asymmetric substrates. To address these issues, we analyzed the structure of the 12RSS in the SC and PC using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and molecular dynamics modeling. The resulting models indicate that the 12RSS adopts a strongly bent V-shaped structure upon RAG/HMGB1 binding and reveal structural differences, particularly near the heptamer, between the 12RSS in the SC and PC. Comparison of models of the 12RSS and 23RSS in the PC reveals broadly similar shapes but a distinct number and location of DNA bends as well as a smaller central cavity for the 12RSS. These findings provide the most detailed view yet of the 12RSS in RAG–DNA complexes and highlight structural features of the RSS that might underlie activation of RAG-mediated cleavage and substrate asymmetry important for the 12/23 rule of V(D)J recombination.     

Restraining the V(D)J recombinase

Chromosome breakage--a dangerous event that has triggered the evolution of several double-strand break repair pathways--has been co-opted by the immune system as an integral part of B- and T-cell development. This is a daring strategy, as improper repair can be deadly for the cell, if not for the whole organism. Even more daring, however, is the choice of a promiscuous transposase as the nuclease responsible for chromosome breakage, as the possibility of transposition brings an entirely new set of risks. What mechanisms constrain the dangerous potential of the recombinase and preserve genomic integrity during immune-system development?