Mutations in Nicastrin Protein Differentially Affect Amyloid β-Peptide Production and Notch Protein Processing

The γ-secretase complex is responsible for intramembrane processing of over 60 substrates and is involved in Notch signaling as well as in the generation of the amyloid β-peptide (Aβ). Aggregated forms of Aβ have a pathogenic role in Alzheimer disease and, thus, reducing the Aβ levels by inhibiting γ-secretase is a possible treatment strategy for Alzheimer disease. Regrettably, clinical trials have shown that inhibition of γ-secretase results in Notch-related side effects. Therefore, it is of great importance to find ways to inhibit amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing without disturbing vital signaling pathways such as Notch. Nicastrin (Nct) is part of the γ-secretase complex and has been proposed to be involved in substrate recognition and selection. We have investigated how the four evenly spaced and conserved cysteine residues in the Nct ectodomain affect APP and Notch processing. We mutated these cysteines to serines and analyzed them in cells lacking endogenous Nct. We found that two mutants, C213S (C2) and C230S (C3), differentially affected APP and Notch processing. Both the formation of Aβ and the intracellular domain of amyloid precursor protein (AICD) were reduced, whereas the production of Notch intracellular domain (NICD) was maintained on a high level, although C230S (C3) showed impaired complex assembly. Our data demonstrate that single residues in a γ-secretase component besides presenilin are able to differentially affect APP and Notch processing.     

γ-Secretase Dependent Production of Intracellular Domains Is Reduced in Adult Compared to Embryonic Rat Brain Membranes

Background

γ-Secretase is an intramembrane aspartyl protease whose cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) generates the amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) and the APP intracellular domain. Aβ is widely believed to have a causative role in Alzheimer''s disease pathogenesis, and therefore modulation of γ-secretase activity has become a therapeutic goal. Besides APP, more than 50 substrates of γ-secretase with different cellular functions during embryogenesis as well as adulthood have been revealed. Prior to γ-secretase cleavage, substrates are ectodomain shedded, producing membrane bound C-terminal fragments (CTFs).

Principal Findings

Here, we investigated γ-secretase cleavage of five substrates; APP, Notch1, N-cadherin, ephrinB and p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75-NTR) in membranes isolated from embryonic, young or old adult rat brain by analyzing the release of the corresponding intracellular domains (ICDs) or Aβ40 by western blot analysis and ELISA respectively. The highest levels of all ICDs and Aβ were produced by embryonic membranes. In adult rat brain only cleavage of APP and Notch1 could be detected and the Aβ40 and ICD production from these substrates was similar in young and old adult rat brain. The CTF levels of Notch1, N-cadherin, ephrinB and p75-NTR were also clearly decreased in the adult brain compared to embryonic brain, whereas the APP CTF levels were only slightly decreased.

Conclusions

In summary our data suggests that γ-secretase dependent ICD production is down-regulated in the adult brain compared to embryonic brain. In addition, the present approach may be useful for evaluating the specificity of γ-secretase inhibitors.     

Presenilin-dependent gamma-secretase processing of beta-amyloid precursor protein at a site corresponding to the S3 cleavage of Notch

The presenilin (PS)-dependent site 3 (S3) cleavage of Notch liberates its intracellular domain (NICD), which is required for Notch signaling. The similar γ-secretase cleavage of the β-amyloid precursor protein (βAPP) results in the secretion of amyloid β-peptide (Aβ). However, little is known about the corresponding C-terminal cleavage product (CTFγ). We have now identified CTFγ in brain tissue, in living cells, as well as in an in vitro system. Generation of CTFγ is facilitated by PSs, since a dominant-negative mutation of PS as well as a PS gene knock out prevents its production. Moreover, γ-secretase inhibitors, including one that is known to bind to PS, also block CTFγ generation. Sequence analysis revealed that CTFγ is produced by a novel γ-secretase cut, which occurs at a site corresponding to the S3 cleavage of Notch.     

Loss of RBPj in Postnatal Excitatory Neurons Does Not Cause Neurodegeneration or Memory Impairments in Aged Mice

Previous studies suggest that loss of γ-secretase activity in postnatal mouse brains causes age-dependent memory impairment and neurodegeneration. Due to the diverse array of γ-secretase substrates, it remains to be demonstrated whether loss of cleavage of any specific substrate(s) is responsible for these defects. The bulk of the phenotypes observed in mammals deficient for γ-secretase or exposed to γ-secretase inhibitors are caused by the loss of Notch receptor proteolysis. Accordingly, inhibition of Notch signaling is the main cause for untoward effects for γ-secretase inhibitors as therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease. Therefore, we wished to determine if loss of canonical Notch signaling is responsible for the age-dependent neurodegeneration observed upon γ-secrectase deficiency in the mouse brain. We generated postnatal forebrain-specific RBPj conditional knockout (cKO) mice using the CamKII-Cre driver and examined behavior and brain pathology in 12–18 month old animals. Since all four mammalian Notch receptor homologues signal via this DNA binding protein, these mice lack canonical Notch signaling. We found that loss of RBPj in mature excitatory neurons was well tolerated, with no evidence for neurodegeneration or of learning and memory impairment in mice aged up to 18 months. The only phenotypic deficit we observed in the RBPj-deficient mice was a subtle abnormality in olfactory preferences, particularly in females. We conclude that the loss of canonical Notch signaling through the four receptors is not responsible for age-dependent neurodegeneration or learning and memory deficits seen in γ-secretase deficient mice.     

The Endocannabinoid,Anandamide, Augments Notch-1 Signaling in Cultured Cortical Neurons Exposed to Amyloid-β and in the Cortex of Aged Rats

Aberrant Notch signaling has recently emerged as a possible mechanism for the altered neurogenesis, cognitive impairment, and learning and memory deficits associated with Alzheimer disease (AD). Recently, targeting the endocannabinoid system in models of AD has emerged as a potential approach to slow the progression of the disease process. Although studies have identified neuroprotective roles for endocannabinoids, there is a paucity of information on modulation of the pro-survival Notch pathway by endocannabinoids. In this study the influence of the endocannabinoids, anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol, on the Notch-1 pathway and on its endogenous regulators were investigated in an in vitro model of AD. We report that AEA up-regulates Notch-1 signaling in cultured neurons. We also provide evidence that although Aβ_1–42 increases expression of the endogenous inhibitor of Notch-1, numb (Nb), this can be prevented by AEA and 2-arachidonoylglycerol. Interestingly, AEA up-regulated Nct expression, a component of γ-secretase, and this was found to play a crucial role in the enhanced Notch-1 signaling mediated by AEA. The stimulatory effects of AEA on Notch-1 signaling persisted in the presence of Aβ_1–42. AEA was found to induce a preferential processing of Notch-1 over amyloid precursor protein to generate Aβ_1–40. Aging, a natural process of neurodegeneration, was associated with a reduction in Notch-1 signaling in rat cortex and hippocampus, and this was restored with chronic treatment with URB 597. In summary, AEA has the proclivity to enhance Notch-1 signaling in an in vitro model of AD, which may have relevance for restoring neurogenesis and cognition in AD.     

A TAG on to the neurogenic functions of APP

The proteolytic processing of amyloid β precursor protein (APP) has long been studied because of its association with the pathology of Alzheimer''s disease (AD). The ectodomain of APP is shed by α- or β-secretase cleavage. The remaining membrane bound stub can then undergo regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP) by γ-secretase. This cleavage can release amyloid β (Aβ) from the stub left by β-secretase cleavage but also releases the APP intracellular domain (AICD) after α- or β-secretase cleavage. The physiological functions of this proteolytic processing are not well understood. We compare the proteolytic processing of APP to the ligand-dependent RIP of Notch. In this review, we discuss recent evidence suggesting that TAG1 is a functional ligand for APP. The interaction between TAG1 and APP triggers γ-secretase-dependent release of AICD. TAG1, APP and Fe65 colocalise in the neurogenic ventricular zone and in fetal neural progenitor cells in vitro. Experiments in TAG1, APP and Fe65 null mice as well as TAG1 and APP double-null mice demonstrate that TAG1 induces a γ-secretase- and Fe65-dependent suppression of neurogenesis.Key words: Amyloid β precursor protein, APP, TAG1, AICD, Fe65, neurogenesis, Alzheimer''s disease     

Regulation of Notch signaling by dynamic changes in the precision of S3 cleavage of Notch-1

Intramembrane proteolysis by presenilin-dependent γ-secretase produces the Notch intracellular cytoplasmic domain (NCID) and Alzheimer disease-associated amyloid-β. Here, we show that upon Notch signaling the intracellular domain of Notch-1 is cleaved into two distinct types of NICD species due to diversity in the site of S3 cleavage. Consistent with the N-end rule, the S3-V cleavage produces stable NICD with Val at the N terminus, whereas the S3-S/S3-L cleavage generates unstable NICD with Ser/Leu at the N terminus. Moreover, intracellular Notch signal transmission with unstable NICDs is much weaker than that with stable NICD. Importantly, the extent of endocytosis in target cells affects the relative production ratio of the two types of NICD, which changes in parallel with Notch signaling. Surprisingly, substantial amounts of unstable NICD species are generated from the Val→Gly and the Lys→Arg mutants, which have been reported to decrease S3 cleavage efficiency in cultured cells. Thus, we suggest that the existence of two distinct types of NICD points to a novel aspect of the intracellular signaling and that changes in the precision of S3 cleavage play an important role in the process of conversion from extracellular to intracellular Notch signaling.     

Second Generation γ-Secretase Modulators Exhibit Different Modulation of Notch β and Aβ Production

The γ-secretase complex is an appealing drug target when the therapeutic strategy is to alter amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) aggregation in Alzheimer disease. γ-Secretase is directly involved in Aβ formation and determines the pathogenic potential of Aβ by generating the aggregation-prone Aβ42 peptide. Because γ-secretase mediates cleavage of many substrates involved in cell signaling, such as the Notch receptor, it is crucial to sustain these pathways while altering the Aβ secretion. A way of avoiding interference with the physiological function of γ-secretase is to use γ-secretase modulators (GSMs) instead of inhibitors of the enzyme. GSMs modify the Aβ formation from producing the amyloid-prone Aβ42 variant to shorter and less amyloidogenic Aβ species. The modes of action of GSMs are not fully understood, and even though the pharmacology of GSMs has been thoroughly studied regarding Aβ generation, knowledge is lacking about their effects on other substrates, such as Notch. Here, using immunoprecipitation followed by MALDI-TOF MS analysis, we found that two novel, second generation GSMs modulate both Notch β and Aβ production. Moreover, by correlating S3-specific Val-1744 cleavage of Notch intracellular domain (Notch intracellular domain) to total Notch intracellular domain levels using immunocytochemistry, we also demonstrated that Notch intracellular domain is not modulated by the compounds. Interestingly, two well characterized, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug), R-flurbiprofen and sulindac sulfide, affect only Aβ and not Notch β formation, indicating that second generation GSMs and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-based GSMs have different modes of action regarding Notch processing.     

γ-Secretase Associated with Lipid Rafts: MULTIPLE INTERACTIVE PATHWAYS IN THE STEPWISE PROCESSING OF β-CARBOXYL-TERMINAL FRAGMENT*

γ-Secretase generates amyloid β-protein (Aβ), a pathogenic molecule in Alzheimer disease, through the intramembrane cleavage of the β-carboxyl-terminal fragment (βCTF) of β-amyloid precursor protein. We previously showed the framework of the γ-secretase cleavage, i.e. the stepwise successive processing of βCTF at every three (or four) amino acids. However, the membrane integrity of γ-secretase was not taken into consideration because of the use of the 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-2-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonic acid-solubilized reconstituted γ-secretase system. Here, we sought to address how the membrane-integrated γ-secretase cleaves βCTF by using γ-secretase associated with lipid rafts. Quantitative analyses using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry of the βCTF transmembrane domain-derived peptides released along with Aβ generation revealed that the raft-associated γ-secretase cleaves βCTF in a stepwise sequential manner, but novel penta- and hexapeptides as well as tri- and tetrapeptides are released. The cropping of these peptides links the two major tripeptide-cleaving pathways generating Aβ40 and Aβ42 at several points, implying that there are multiple interactive pathways for the stepwise cleavages of βCTF. It should be noted that Aβ38 and Aβ43 are generated through three routes, and γ-secretase modulator 1 enhances all the three routes generating Aβ38, which results in decreases in Aβ42 and Aβ43 and an increase in Aβ38. These observations indicate that multiple interactive pathways for stepwise successive processing by γ-secretase define the species and quantity of Aβ produced.     

A Presenilin-1 Mutation Identified in Familial Alzheimer Disease with Cotton Wool Plaques Causes a Nearly Complete Loss of γ-Secretase Activity

Mutations in presenilin-1 and presenilin-2 (PS1 and PS2) are the most common cause of familial Alzheimer disease. PS1 and PS2 are the presumptive catalytic components of the multisubunit γ-secretase complex, which proteolyzes a number of type I transmembrane proteins, including the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and Notch. APP processing by γ-secretase produces β-amyloid peptides (Aβ40 and Aβ42) that accumulate in the Alzheimer disease brain. Here we identify a pathogenic L435F mutation in PS1 in two affected siblings with early-onset familial Alzheimer disease characterized by deposition of cerebral cotton wool plaques. The L435F mutation resides in a conserved C-terminal PAL sequence implicated in active site conformation and catalytic activity. The impact of PS1 mutations in and around the PAL motif on γ-secretase activity was assessed by expression of mutant PS1 in mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking endogenous PS1 and PS2. Surprisingly, the L435F mutation caused a nearly complete loss of γ-secretase activity, including >90% reductions in the generation of Aβ40, Aβ42, and the APP and Notch intracellular domains. Two nonpathogenic PS1 mutations, P433L and L435R, caused essentially complete loss of γ-secretase activity, whereas two previously identified pathogenic PS1 mutations, P436Q and P436S, caused partial loss of function with substantial reductions in production of Aβ40, Aβ42, and the APP and Notch intracellular domains. These results argue against overproduction of Aβ42 as an essential property of presenilin proteins bearing pathogenic mutations. Rather, our findings provide support for the hypothesis that pathogenic mutations cause a general loss of presenilin function.     

Proteomic Profiling of γ-Secretase Substrates and Mapping of Substrate Requirements

The presenilin/γ-secretase complex, an unusual intramembrane aspartyl protease, plays an essential role in cellular signaling and membrane protein turnover. Its ability to liberate numerous intracellular signaling proteins from the membrane and also mediate the secretion of amyloid-β protein (Aβ) has made modulation of γ-secretase activity a therapeutic goal for cancer and Alzheimer disease. Although the proteolysis of the prototypical substrates Notch and β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) has been intensely studied, the full spectrum of substrates and the determinants that make a transmembrane protein a substrate remain unclear. Using an unbiased approach to substrate identification, we surveyed the proteome of a human cell line for targets of γ-secretase and found a relatively small population of new substrates, all of which are type I transmembrane proteins but have diverse biological roles. By comparing these substrates to type I proteins not regulated by γ-secretase, we determined that besides a short ectodomain, γ-secretase requires permissive transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains to bind and cleave its substrates. In addition, we provide evidence for at least two mechanisms that can target a substrate for γ cleavage: one in which a substrate with a short ectodomain is directly cleaved independent of sheddase association, and a second where a substrate requires ectodomain shedding to instruct subsequent γ-secretase processing. These findings expand our understanding of the mechanisms of substrate selection as well as the diverse cellular processes to which γ-secretase contributes.     

Proteomic Profiling of γ-Secretase Substrates and Mapping of Substrate Requirements

The presenilin/γ-secretase complex, an unusual intramembrane aspartyl protease, plays an essential role in cellular signaling and membrane protein turnover. Its ability to liberate numerous intracellular signaling proteins from the membrane and also mediate the secretion of amyloid-β protein (Aβ) has made modulation of γ-secretase activity a therapeutic goal for cancer and Alzheimer disease. Although the proteolysis of the prototypical substrates Notch and β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) has been intensely studied, the full spectrum of substrates and the determinants that make a transmembrane protein a substrate remain unclear. Using an unbiased approach to substrate identification, we surveyed the proteome of a human cell line for targets of γ-secretase and found a relatively small population of new substrates, all of which are type I transmembrane proteins but have diverse biological roles. By comparing these substrates to type I proteins not regulated by γ-secretase, we determined that besides a short ectodomain, γ-secretase requires permissive transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains to bind and cleave its substrates. In addition, we provide evidence for at least two mechanisms that can target a substrate for γ cleavage: one in which a substrate with a short ectodomain is directly cleaved independent of sheddase association, and a second where a substrate requires ectodomain shedding to instruct subsequent γ-secretase processing. These findings expand our understanding of the mechanisms of substrate selection as well as the diverse cellular processes to which γ-secretase contributes.     

γ-Secretase Processing and Effects of γ-Secretase Inhibitors and Modulators on Long Aβ Peptides in Cells

Understanding how different species of Aβ are generated by γ-secretase cleavage has broad therapeutic implications, because shifts in γ-secretase processing that increase the relative production of Aβx-42/43 can initiate a pathological cascade, resulting in Alzheimer disease. We have explored the sequential stepwise γ-secretase cleavage model in cells. Eighteen BRI2-Aβ fusion protein expression constructs designed to generate peptides from Aβ1–38 to Aβ1–55 and C99 (CTFβ) were transfected into cells, and Aβ production was assessed. Secreted and cell-associated Aβ were detected using ELISA and immunoprecipitation MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Aβ peptides from 1–38 to 1–55 were readily detected in the cells and as soluble full-length Aβ proteins in the media. Aβ peptides longer than Aβ1–48 were efficiently cleaved by γ-secretase and produced varying ratios of Aβ1–40:Aβ1–42. γ-Secretase cleavage of Aβ1–51 resulted in much higher levels of Aβ1–42 than any other long Aβ peptides, but the processing of Aβ1–51 was heterogeneous with significant amounts of shorter Aβs, including Aβ1–40, produced. Two PSEN1 variants altered Aβ1–42 production from Aβ1–51 but not Aβ1–49. Unexpectedly, long Aβ peptide substrates such as Aβ1–49 showed reduced sensitivity to inhibition by γ-secretase inhibitors. In contrast, long Aβ substrates showed little differential sensitivity to multiple γ-secretase modulators. Although these studies further support the sequential γ-secretase cleavage model, they confirm that in cells the initial γ-secretase cleavage does not precisely define subsequent product lines. These studies also raise interesting issues about the solubility and detection of long Aβ, as well as the use of truncated substrates for assessing relative potency of γ-secretase inhibitors.     

β-Arrestin1 regulates γ-secretase complex assembly and modulates amyloid-β pathology

Alzheimer''s disease (AD) is a progressive and complex neurodegenerative disease in which the γ-secretase-mediated amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology plays an important role. We found that a multifunctional protein, β-arrestin1, facilitated the formation of NCT/APH-1 (anterior pharynx-defective phenotype 1) precomplex and mature γ-secretase complex through its functional interaction with APH-1. Deficiency of β-arrestin1 or inhibition of binding of β-arrestin1 with APH-1 by small peptides reduced Aβ production without affecting Notch processing. Genetic ablation of β-arrestin1 diminished Aβ pathology and behavioral deficits in transgenic AD mice. Moreover, in brains of sporadic AD patients and transgenic AD mice, the expression of β-arrestin1 was upregulated and correlated well with neuropathological severity and senile Aβ plaques. Thus, our study identifies a regulatory mechanism underlying both γ-secretase assembly and AD pathogenesis, and indicates that specific reduction of Aβ pathology can be achieved by regulation of the γ-secretase assembly.     

The Ubiquitin Ligase Synoviolin Up-regulates Amyloid β Production by Targeting a Negative Regulator of γ-Secretase,Rer1, for Degradation

Alzheimer''s disease is characterized by the deposition of Aβ, which is generated from the amyloid precursor protein through its cleavage by β- and γ-secretases. The γ-secretase complex component nicastrin (NCT) plays significant roles in the assembly and proper trafficking of the γ-secretase complex and in the recognition of amyloid precursor protein. NCT is incorporated into the γ-secretase complex in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and glycosylated in the Golgi. In contrast, unassembled NCT is retrieved or retained in the ER by the protein Retention in endoplasmic reticulum 1 (Rer1). We reported previously that synoviolin (Syvn), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, degrades NCT and affects the generation of Aβ. Here, we examined in more detail the effect of Syvn on the generation of Aβ. We found that overexpression of a dominant negative form of Syvn (C307A mutant) and a Syvn-RNAi decreased the generation of Aβ. These results indicate that the ubiquitin ligase activity of Syvn up-regulates the generation of Aβ. We hypothesized, therefore, that Syvn regulates the assembly or localization of the γ-secretase complex by ubiquitinating Rer1, resulting in its subsequent degradation. Our findings that the level of Rer1 was increased in Syvn knockout fibroblasts because of inhibition of its degradation support this hypothesis. Moreover, we found that Rer1 interacts with Syvn in the ER, is ubiquitinated by Syvn, and is then degraded via the proteasome or lysosomal pathways. Finally, we showed that localization of mature NCT to the plasma membrane as well as γ-secretase complex levels are decreased in fibroblasts of Syvn knockout mice. Thus, it is likely that Syvn regulates the assembly of the γ-secretase complex via the degradation of Rer1, which results in the generation of Aβ.     

Independent Relationship between Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) Dimerization and γ-Secretase Processivity

Altered production of β-amyloid (Aβ) from the amyloid precursor protein (APP) is closely associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). APP has a number of homo- and hetero-dimerizing domains, and studies have suggested that dimerization of β-secretase derived APP carboxyl terminal fragment (CTFβ, C99) impairs processive cleavage by γ-secretase increasing production of long Aβs (e.g., Aβ1-42, 43). Other studies report that APP CTFβ dimers are not γ-secretase substrates. We revisited this issue due to observations made with an artificial APP mutant referred to as 3xK-APP, which contains three lysine residues at the border of the APP ectodomain and transmembrane domain (TMD). This mutant, which dramatically increases production of long Aβ, was found to form SDS-stable APP dimers, once again suggesting a mechanistic link between dimerization and increased production of long Aβ. To further evaluate how multimerization of substrate affects both initial γ-secretase cleavage and subsequent processivity, we generated recombinant wild type- (WT) and 3xK-C100 substrates, isolated monomeric, dimeric and trimeric forms of these proteins, and evaluated both ε-cleavage site utilization and Aβ production. These show that multimerization significantly impedes γ-secretase cleavage, irrespective of substrate sequence. Further, the monomeric form of the 3xK-C100 mutant increased long Aβ production without altering the initial ε-cleavage utilization. These data confirm and extend previous studies showing that dimeric substrates are not efficient γ-secretase substrates, and demonstrate that primary sequence determinants within APP substrate alter γ-secretase processivity.     

Dual Role of α-Secretase Cleavage in the Regulation of γ-Secretase Activity for Amyloid Production

Processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β- and γ-secretases generates pathogenic β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides associated with Alzheimer disease (AD), whereas cleavage of APP by α-secretases precludes Aβ formation. Little is known about the role of α-secretase cleavage in γ-secretase regulation. Here, we show that α-secretase-cleaved APP C-terminal product (αCTF) functions as an inhibitor of γ-secretase. We demonstrate that the substrate inhibitory domain (ASID) within αCTF, which is bisected by the α-secretase cleavage site, contributes to this negative regulation because deleting or masking this domain turns αCTF into a better substrate for γ-secretase. Moreover, α-secretase cleavage can potentiate the inhibitory effect of ASID. Inhibition of γ-secretase activity by αCTF is observed in both in vitro and cellular systems. This work reveals an unforeseen role for α-secretase in generating an endogenous γ-secretase inhibitor that down-regulates the production of Aβ. Deregulation of this feedback mechanism may contribute to the pathogenesis of AD.