DNA条形码及其在生物多样性研究中的应用

DNA条形码是利用生物体内标准的、有足够变异的、易扩增且相对较短的DNA片段对物种进行快速准确鉴定的技术。自2003年DNA条形码相关概念提出以来广受关注,国内外相继开展了DNA条形码及信息系统建设研究,为DNA条形码技术的发展提供了坚实的研究基础和生物信息学分析平台。DNA条形码技术弥补了传统分类学的不足,为生物多样性研究提供了新的思路和方法。本文介绍了DNA条形码的产生与发展过程,国内外DNA条形码技术与信息系统建设研究进展,重点阐述了DNA条形码技术在物种鉴定、濒危物种保护、隐存种发现、生物多样性评估等研究领域中的应用。最后结合DNA条形码技术目前存在的问题,对其在相关研究领域的应用前景进行了展望。     

关于植物DNA条形码研究技术规范

DNA条形码是利用标准的基因片段对物种进行快速鉴定的技术,已经成功用于生物物种分类和鉴定、生态学调查和生物多样性评估等研究领域。尽管生命条形码数据（BOLD）系统提供了主要针对动物类群DNA条形码研究的技术规范,但由于植物本身的生物学特性与所使用的条形码不同,因此已有技术规范并不完全适用于植物DNA条形码的研究。本文根据植物DNA条形码研究的特点与我国的实际情况,编写了植物DNA条形码研究技术标准和规范指南,具体包括十个方面的内容,即植物DNA条形码研究的样品采集策略;植物标本和野外数据的采集规范;植物标本图像信息的采集规范;植物DNA材料的采集规范;植物DNA材料的干燥与保存规范;植物总DNA的质量标准及保存规范;植物标准DNA条形码的选择与通用引物;DNA条形码的扩增与测序;DNA条形码数据的命名、编辑和提交规范;以及DNA条形码数据分析。我们期望通过这些标准规范的实施和在实践中的不断修订和完善,能为我国学者开展植物DNA条形码和iFlora研究提供参考和借鉴。
关键词：植物DNA条形码;技术规范;物种鉴定;标准;新一代植物志     

DNA条形码技术的研究进展及其应用

DNA条形码技术(DNA Barcod ing)是通过对一个标准目的基因的DNA序列进行分析从而进行物种鉴定的技术。这个概念的原理与零售业中对商品进行辨认的商品条形码是一样的。简单地说,DNA条形码技术的关键就是对一个或一些相关基因进行大范围的扫描,进而来鉴定某个未知的物种或者发现新种[1—3]。自从提出DNA条形码的概念以来,这种新兴分类学技术已经引起了越来越多的生物学家的关注。DNA条形码技术是分类学中辅助物种鉴定的新技术,它代表了生物分类学研究的一个新方向[4],因此它在生态、环境、食品等诸多领域都将会有广泛的应用[5]。本文概括综述了DNA条形码技术的发展历史、原理与操作,分析了其在生物分类中的应用及应用上的优势与限制,对DNA条形码技术在鱼类学研究的意义与可行性进行了探讨。1 DNA条形码技术的发展历史2003年,Herbert研究发现利用线粒体细胞色素C氧化酶亚基Ⅰ(M itochondrial cytochrom ecoxidase subun itⅠ,COⅠ)基因一段长度为648bp的片段,能够在DNA水平上成功的区分物种,并且认为利用COⅠ基因从分子演化的角度,将提供一种快速、简便、可信的分...     

DNA条形码研究进展

DNA条形码是应用有足够变异的标准化短基因片段对物种进行快速、准确鉴定的新的生物身份识别系统.2003年,加拿大Guelph大学Hebert等首次正式提出了DNA条形码概念,2004年成立了生物条形码联盟,目前有来自50个国家的两百多个组织成为其成员,2007年5月加拿大Guelph大学组建了世界上第一个DNA barcoding鉴定中心,2009年1月正式启动"国际生命条形码计划",中国科学院代表中国与加拿大、美国和欧盟共同为iBOL 4个中心节点.线粒体细胞色素C氧化酶基因COⅠ具有引物通用性高和进化速率快等优点,是理想的动物DNA条形码,不过,COⅠ在植物中应用效果较差,因此,核糖体ITS序列和质体rbcL、matK和trnH-psbA等序列也相继被引入植物的DNA条形码研究.虽然DNA条形码研究还处于起步阶段,面临巨大挑战,但是,越来越多的研究表明DNA条形码可以广泛应用于生物的分类和鉴定,是一种简便、高效、准确的物种鉴定技术,已经在动物、植物和微生物等研究中取得了显著成果,是生命科学领域发展最快的学科前沿之一.本文从DNA条形码的开发、应用、国内相关文献研究现状、DNA条形码面临的挑战以及发展前景等进行了综合分析,以期推动我国DNA条形码和分类学研究的发展.     

DNA条形码：物种分类和鉴定技术

当前,一项称为“生命的条形码”计划正在欧美等国展开,其目的是实现对地球上现存的约1000万物种进行快速和准确的鉴定。DNA条形码是一种利用短的DNA序列对物种进行鉴定的技术。对DNA条形码的概念和原理进行了介绍,举例说明了其在物种分类、遗传多样性及物种鉴定研究中广泛的利用价值,阐述了当前该领域的研究现状,对未来的发展方向进行了展望。     

线粒体COⅠ基因在昆虫DNA条形码中的研究与应用

自2003年DNA条形码(DNA barcodes)概念出现以来,DNA条形码技术(DNA barcoding)受到生物分类学领域普遍关注,线粒体细胞色素氧化酶亚基I(mtDNACOⅠ)被用作动物类群的主要条形码序列,基于该基因片段的昆虫条形码研究在国内外广泛开展。本文在概述DNA条形码、条形码技术及已开展的昆虫条形码研究计划的基础上,总结了昆虫mtDNACOⅠ条形码及其技术在发现和描述隐种、种类分子鉴定以及系统发育等方面的研究进展,分析了细胞核线粒体假基因(Numts)对mtDNACOⅠ条形码扩增的影响,提出检测和避免Numts的方法,并对DNA条形码技术的进一步研究和应用进行了讨论和展望。     

DNA条形码在生态学研究中的应用与展望

DNA条形码是利用标准的DNA片段对物种进行快速鉴定的技术,已在生物学各相关领域得到广泛应用。随着DNA条形码技术的不断发展和完善,已成功应用于生态学领域的相关研究中。本文综述了DNA条形码在物种快速鉴定和隐存种发现、群落系统发育重建和生态取证、群落内物种间相互关系研究等方面的应用,并介绍了DNAmetabarcoding技术和环境DNA条形码在生物多样性和生态学研究领域中的应用。最后,结合新的测序技术和未来大科学装置的发展,在相关数据库逐渐完善,新分析方法和计算模型不断开发使用的情景下,对DNA条形码在生态学相关领域的应用前景进行了展望。     

植物DNA条形码研究领域文献计量学及可视化分析

为全面了解植物DNA条形码研究领域的发展和最新动态,探讨中国DNA条形码发展的状态和前景,该文利用Web of Science数据库对该研究领域进行文献计量学统计,并对引用频次、研究热点和研究前沿进行了可视化分析。结果表明:(1)中国、美国、加拿大学者在该领域文献贡献率最大,中国研究机构发文量领先,但美国、加拿大科研机构论文质量较高,影响力较大。(2) 2009年是该领域研究的高峰期,该研究领域的前沿和研究热点主要集中在物种的识别和生物多样性应用、DNA条形码候选序列筛选和鉴定技术的规范化。(3)中国学者在植物DNA条形码领域研究具有领军作用和很高的影响力,国家提倡中药产业的发展也推动了我国DNA条形码蓬勃发展,但论文的质量和影响力与美国、英国、加拿大等发达国家研究还有一定差距,应加大与发达国家科研机构合作,提高研究能力,DNA条形码技术在植物的鉴定、分类和生物多样性的保护起到非常重要的作用。这表明建立一个更全面、通用的全球植物DNA条码库以及开发新的标记并采用新的测序技术是植物DNA条形码研究的未来前景。     

DNA宏条形码技术在食草动物食性研究中的应用

随着测序技术的快速发展,整合DNA条形码和高通量测序的DNA宏条形码技术已经成为当前研究热点之一,在食草动物的食性鉴定中有很大潜力.放牧动物食性研究是动物营养学和草地生态学领域的重要研究内容.而与传统食性研究方法相比,宏条形码技术可通过对植物DNA条形码的高通量测序,获得样本中的物种组成进而分析动物食性.介绍了传统食性...     

DNA条形码分析方法研究进展

DNA条形码是一段短的、标准化的DNA序列,DNA条形码技术通过对DNA条形码序列分析实现物种的有效鉴定.随着生物DNA条形码序列的大量测定,DNA条形码分析方法得到迅速发展,推动了其在生物分子鉴定中的应用.2003年以来,DNA条形码技术已广泛应用于动物、植物和真菌等物种的鉴定,并有力地推动了生物分类学、生物多样性和生态学等学科的发展.本文在综述DNA条形码技术的基础上,总结了5类主要的DNA条形码分析方法,即基于遗传距离的分析、基于遗传相似度的分析、基于系统发育树的分析、基于序列特征的分析和基于统计分类法的分析,并进一步展望了DNA条形码技术的发展与应用.     

DNA barcoding of crickets,katydids and grasshoppers (Orthoptera) from Central Europe with focus on Austria,Germany and Switzerland

We present a DNA barcoding study on the insect order Orthoptera that was generated in collaboration between four barcoding projects in three countries, viz. Barcoding Fauna Bavarica (Germany), German Barcode of Life, Austrian Barcode of Life and Swiss Barcode of Life. Our data set includes 748 COI sequences from 127 of the 162 taxa (78.4%) recorded in the three countries involved. Ninety‐three of these 122 species (76.2%, including all Ensifera) can be reliably identified using DNA barcodes. The remaining 26 caeliferan species (families Acrididae and Tetrigidae) form ten clusters that share barcodes among up to five species, in three cases even across different genera, and in six cases even sharing individual barcodes. We discuss incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization as most likely causes of this phenomenon, as the species concerned are phylogenetically young and hybridization has been previously observed. We also highlight the problem of nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes (numts), a known problem in the barcoding of orthopteran species, and the possibility of Wolbachia infections. Finally, we discuss the possible taxonomic implications of our barcoding results and point out future research directions.     

A simplified arthropod genomic-DNA extraction protocol for polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based specimen identification through barcoding

Genomic DNA extraction protocols generally require the use of expensive and hazardous reagents necessary for decontamination of phenolic compounds from the extracts. In addition, they are lengthy, hindering large-scale sample extractions necessary for high-throughput analyses. Here we describe a simple, time and cost-efficient method for genomic DNA extraction from insects. The extracted DNA was successfully used in a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), making it suitable for automation for large-scale genetic analysis and barcoding studies. The protocol employs a single purification step to remove polysaccharides and other contaminating compounds using a non-hazardous reagent buffer. In addition, we conducted a bioinformatics database analysis as proof of concept for the efficiency of the DNA extraction protocol by using universal barcoding primers specific for cytochrome c oxidase I gene to identify different arthropod specimens through Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) database search. The usefulness of this protocol in various molecular biology and biodiversity studies is further discussed.     

An update on DNA barcoding: low species coverage and numerous unidentified sequences

DNA barcoding was proposed in 2003, the Consortium for the Barcode of Life was established in 2004, and the movement has since attracted more than $80 million funding. Here we investigate how many species of multicellular animals have been barcoded. We compare the numbers in a public database (GenBank as of January 2012) with those in the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) and find that GenBank contains COI (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1) sequences for ca. 60 000 species while BOLD reports barcodes for ca. 150 000 species. The discrepancy is likely due to a large amount of unpublished data in BOLD. Overall, the species coverage remains sparse, growth rates are low, and the barcode accumulation curve for Metazoa is linear with only 4788 species having been added in 2011. In addition, the vast majority of species in the public database (73%) were barcoded by projects that are unlikely to be related to the DNA barcoding movement. Particularly surprising was the large number of DNA barcodes in GenBank that were not identified to species (Jan 2012: 74%), with insect barcodes often being identified only to order. Of these several hundred thousand have since been suppressed by NCBI because they did not satisfy the iBOL/GenBank early release agreement. Species coverage is considerably better for target taxa of DNA barcoding campaigns (e.g. birds, fishes, Lepidoptera), although it also falls short of published campaign targets. © The Willi Hennig Society 2012     

植物DNA条形码技术

DNA条形码技术是利用标准的、具有足够变异的、易扩增且相对较短的DNA片段在物种内的特异性和种间的多样性而创建的一种新的生物身份识别系统, 从而实现对物种的快速自动鉴定。尽管这一技术在理论上和具体应用上仍存在很多争论, 但DNA条形码概念自2003年由加拿大分类学家Paul Hebert首次提出后就在世界范围内受到了广泛关注。在植物类群中条形码的研究和应用尚处于探索阶段, 稍落后于对动物类群的研究, 这主要表现在: (1) DNA条形码的选择及其评价仍没有统一的标准; (2) 对类群较全面的形态分类学修订和植物DNA条形码研究的结合十分缺乏; (3) 以往研究在取样上尺度较大, 而对具体类群的研究较少, 一个科或一个属只用有限的种类作为代表, 同一种内的取样个体数量也不足, 这样虽然表面上看来利用选定的DNA条形码可以较容易地把代表物种区分开, 但实际上目前建议的植物DNA条形码(例如由生命条形码咨询委员会植物工作组最近提出的rbcL和matK)由于其分子进化速率较慢, 在种级水平上, 特别是对于那些经历了适应辐射或快速进化的属来说, 分辨率较低。而DNA条形码的应用主要集中在属内物种水平的鉴别, 因此只有针对具体类群进行探索研究, 发现进化速率较快、分辨率高且通用性好的条形码, 才可能为建立完整的条形码数据库起到积极有效的作用。     

The Barcode of Life Data Portal: bridging the biodiversity informatics divide for DNA barcoding

With the volume of molecular sequence data that is systematically being generated globally, there is a need for centralized resources for data exploration and analytics. DNA Barcode initiatives are on track to generate a compendium of molecular sequence-based signatures for identifying animals and plants. To date, the range of available data exploration and analytic tools to explore these data have only been available in a boutique form--often representing a frustrating hurdle for many researchers that may not necessarily have resources to install or implement algorithms described by the analytic community. The Barcode of Life Data Portal (BDP) is a first step towards integrating the latest biodiversity informatics innovations with molecular sequence data from DNA barcoding. Through establishment of community driven standards, based on discussion with the Data Analysis Working Group (DAWG) of the Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL), the BDP provides an infrastructure for incorporation of existing and next-generation DNA barcode analytic applications in an open forum.     

Current progress in DNA barcoding and future implications for entomology

DNA barcoding is a technique for identifying organisms based on a short, standardized fragment of genomic DNA. The standardized sequence region is called a DNA barcode because it is like a barcode tag for each taxon. Since the proposition of this concept and the launch of a large project named the Barcode of Life, this simple technique has attracted attention from taxonomists, ecologists, conservation biologists, agriculturists, plant‐quarantine officers and others, and the number of studies using the DNA barcode has rapidly increased. The extreme diversity of insects and their economical, epidemiological and agricultural importance have made this group a major target of DNA barcoding. However, there is some controversy about the utility of DNA barcoding. In this review, we present an overview of DNA barcoding and its application to entomology. We also introduce current advances and future implications of this promising technique.     

Identifying gastropod spawn from DNA barcodes: possible but not yet practicable

Identifying life stages of species with complex life histories is problematic as species are often only known and/or described from a single stage. DNA barcoding has been touted as an important tool for linking life-history stages of the same species. To test the current efficacy of DNA barcodes for identifying unknown mollusk life stages, 24 marine gastropod egg capsules were collected off the Philippines in deep water and sequenced for partial fragments of the COI, 16S and 12S mitochondrial genes. Two egg capsules of known shallow-water Mediterranean species were used to calibrate the method. These sequences were compared to those available in GenBank and the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD). Using COI sequences alone, only a single Mediterranean egg capsule was identified to species, and a single Philippine egg capsule was identified tentatively to genus; all other COI sequences recovered matches between 76% and 90% with sequences from BOLD and GenBank. Similarity-based identification using all three markers confirmed the Mediterranean specimens' identifications. A phylogenetic approach was also implemented to confirm similarity-based identifications and provide a higher-taxonomic identification when species-level identifications were not possible. Comparison of available GenBank sequences to the diversity curve of a well-sampled coral reef habitat in New Caledonia highlights the poor taxonomic coverage achieved at present in existing genetic databases, emphasizing the need to develop DNA barcoding projects for megadiverse and often taxonomically challenging groups such as mollusks, to fully realize its potential as an identification and discovery tool.     

The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL

FISH-BOL, the Fish Barcode of Life campaign, is an international research collaboration that is assembling a standardized reference DNA sequence library for all fishes. Analysis is targeting a 648 base pair region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene. More than 5000 species have already been DNA barcoded, with an average of five specimens per species, typically vouchers with authoritative identifications. The barcode sequence from any fish, fillet, fin, egg or larva can be matched against these reference sequences using BOLD; the Barcode of Life Data System ( http://www.barcodinglife.org ). The benefits of barcoding fishes include facilitating species identification, highlighting cases of range expansion for known species, flagging previously overlooked species and enabling identifications where traditional methods cannot be applied. Results thus far indicate that barcodes separate c. 98 and 93% of already described marine and freshwater fish species, respectively. Several specimens with divergent barcode sequences have been confirmed by integrative taxonomic analysis as new species. Past concerns in relation to the use of fish barcoding for species discrimination are discussed. These include hybridization, recent radiations, regional differentiation in barcode sequences and nuclear copies of the barcode region. However, current results indicate these issues are of little concern for the great majority of specimens.     

bold: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org)

The Barcode of Life Data System (bold) is an informatics workbench aiding the acquisition, storage, analysis and publication of DNA barcode records. By assembling molecular, morphological and distributional data, it bridges a traditional bioinformatics chasm. bold is freely available to any researcher with interests in DNA barcoding. By providing specialized services, it aids the assembly of records that meet the standards needed to gain BARCODE designation in the global sequence databases. Because of its web-based delivery and flexible data security model, it is also well positioned to support projects that involve broad research alliances. This paper provides a brief introduction to the key elements of bold, discusses their functional capabilities, and concludes by examining computational resources and future prospects.