DNA sliding and loop formation by E. coli SMC complex: MukBEF

SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) complexes share conserved architectures and function in chromosome maintenance via an unknown mechanism. Here we have used single-molecule techniques to study MukBEF, the SMC complex in Escherichia coli. Real-time movies show MukB alone can compact DNA and ATP inhibits DNA compaction by MukB. We observed that DNA unidirectionally slides through MukB, potentially by a ratchet mechanism, and the sliding speed depends on the elastic energy stored in the DNA. MukE, MukF and ATP binding stabilize MukB and DNA interaction, and ATP hydrolysis regulates the loading/unloading of MukBEF from DNA. Our data suggests a new model for how MukBEF organizes the bacterial chromosome in vivo; and this model will be relevant for other SMC proteins.     

The MukF subunit of Escherichia coli condensin: architecture and functional relationship to kleisins

The Escherichia coli MukB, MukE, and MukF proteins form a bacterial condensin (MukBEF) that contributes to chromosome management by compacting DNA. MukB is an ATPase and DNA-binding protein of the SMC superfamily; however, the structure and function of non-SMC components, such as MukF, have been less forthcoming. Here, we report the crystal structure of the N-terminal 287 amino acids of MukF at 2.9 A resolution. This region folds into a winged-helix domain and an extended coiled-coil domain that self-associate to form a stable, doubly domain-swapped dimer. Protein dissection and affinity purification data demonstrate that the region of MukF C-terminal to this fragment binds to MukE and MukB. Our findings, together with sequence analyses, indicate that MukF is a kleisin subunit for E. coli condensin and suggest a means by which it may organize the MukBEF assembly.     

Comparison of MukB homodimer versus MukBEF complex molecular architectures by electron microscopy reveals a higher-order multimerization

The complex of MukF, MukE, and MukB proteins participates in organization of sister chromosomes and partitioning into both daughter cells in Escherichia coli. We purified the MukB homodimer and the MukBEF complex and analyzed them by electron microscopy to compare both structures. A MukB homodimer shows a long rod-hinge-rod v-shape with small globular domains at both ends. The MukBEF complex shows a similar structure having larger globular domains than those of the MukB homodimer. These results suggest that MukF and MukE bind to the globular domains of a MukB homodimer. The globular domains of the MukBEF complex frequently associate with each other in an intramolecular fashion, forming a ring. In addition, MukBEF complex molecules tend to form multimers by the end-to-end joining with other MukBEF molecules in an intermolecular fashion, resulting in fibers and rosette-form structures in the absence of ATP and DNA in vitro.     

The role of MukE in assembling a functional MukBEF complex

The MukB-MukE-MukF protein complex is essential for chromosome condensation and segregation in Escherichia coli. The central component of this complex, the MukB protein, is related functionally and structurally to the ubiquitous SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) proteins. In a manner similar to SMC, MukB requires the association of two accessory proteins (MukE and MukF) for its function. MukF is a constitutive dimer that bridges the interaction between MukB and MukE. While MukB can condense DNA on its own, it requires MukF and MukE to ensure proper chromosome segregation. Here, we present a novel structure of the E. coli MukE-MukF complex, in which the intricate crystal packing interactions reveal an alternative MukE dimerization interface spanning both N- and C-terminal winged-helix domains of the protein. The structure also unveils additional cross-linking interactions between adjacent MukE-MukF complexes mediated by MukE. A variant of MukE encompassing point mutations on one of these surfaces does not affect assembly of the MukB-MukE-MukF complex and yet cannot restore the temperature sensitivity of the mukE∷kan strain, suggesting that this surface may mediate critical protein-protein interactions between MukB-MukE-MukF complexes. Since the dimerization interface of MukE overlaps with the region of the protein that interacts with MukB in the MukB-MukE-MukF complex, we suggest that competing MukB-MukE and MukE-MukE interactions may regulate the formation of higher-order structures of bacterial condensin.     

Complex formation of MukB, MukE and MukF proteins involved in chromosome partitioning in Escherichia coli.

mukF, mukE and mukB genes are essential for the process of chromosome partitioning in Escherichia coli. We have studied protein-protein interactions among MukB, MukE and MukF proteins by co-immunoprecipitation and sucrose gradient sedimentation experiments, using mukFEB null cells harboring plasmids carrying the wild-type or mutant-type mukFEB operon. MukB forms a complex with MukF and MukE. Analysis of mutant MukB proteins suggested that MukF and MukE bind the C-terminal globular domain of MukB. MukF is indispensable for an interaction between MukB and MukE; however, MukF itself is able to associate with MukB even in the absence of MukE. We have also found that MukF has a Ca(2+)-binding activity. Although purified MukF was able to make a complex either with MukE or MukB, a complex consisting of the three Muk proteins was barely detected in vitro. However, increasing the Ca(2+) or Mg(2+) concentration in the reaction partially restored complex formation. This suggests that Ca(2+) or Mg(2+) may be required for the formation of a complex consisting of the three Muk proteins, and thus may participate in a particular step during chromosome partitioning.     

Chromosome condensation in the absence of the non-SMC subunits of MukBEF

MukBEF is a bacterial SMC (structural maintenance of chromosome) complex required for chromosome partitioning in Escherichia coli. We report that overproduction of MukBEF results in marked chromosome condensation. This condensation is rapid and precedes the effects of overproduction on macromolecular synthesis. Condensed nucleoids are often mispositioned; however, cell viability is only mildly affected. The overproduction of MukB leads to a similar chromosome condensation, even in the absence of MukE and MukF. Thus, the non-SMC subunits of MukBEF play only an auxiliary role in chromosome condensation. MukBEF, however, was often a better condensin than MukB. Furthermore, the chromosome condensation by MukB did not rescue the temperature sensitivity of MukEF-deficient cells, nor did it suppress the high frequency of anucleate cell formation. We infer that the role of MukBEF in stabilizing chromatin architecture is more versatile than its role in controlling chromosome size. We further propose that MukBEF could be directly involved in chromosome segregation.     

MukEF Is required for stable association of MukB with the chromosome

MukB is a bacterial SMC(structural maintenance of chromosome) protein required for correct folding of the Escherichia coli chromosome. MukB acts in complex with the two non-SMC proteins, MukE and MukF. The role of MukEF is unclear. MukEF disrupts MukB-DNA interactions in vitro. In vivo, however, MukEF stimulates MukB-induced DNA condensation and is required for the assembly of MukB clusters at the quarter positions of the cell length. We report here that MukEF is essential for stable association of MukB with the chromosome. We found that MukBEF forms a stable complex with the chromosome that copurifies with nucleoids following gentle cell lysis. Little MukB could be found with the nucleoids in the absence or upon overproduction of MukEF. Similarly, overproduced MukEF recruited MukB-green fluorescent protein (GFP) from its quarter positions, indicating that formation of MukB-GFP clusters and stable association with the chromosome could be mechanistically related. Finally, we report that MukE-GFP forms foci at the quarter positions of the cell length but not in cells that lack MukB or overproduce MukEF, suggesting that the clusters are formed by MukBEF and not by its individual subunits. These data support the view that MukBEF acts as a macromolecular assembly, a scaffold, in chromosome organization and that MukEF is essential for the assembly of this scaffold.     

Identification of two new genes,mukE andmukF, involved in chromosome partitioning inEscherichia coli

We have previously reported that the MukB protein is essential for chromosome partitioning inEscherichia coli and thatmukB mutants produce anucleate cells and are temperature-sensitive for colony formation. ThemukB gene maps at 21 min on theE. coli chromosome andsmtA-mukF-mukE-mukB genes might comprise an operon, which is transcribed in a clockwise direction. Here, we report thatmukF andmukE null mutants are both temperature-sensitive for colony formation and produce anucleate cells even at the permissive temperature. These phenotypes are the same as those observed in themukB null mutant. The primary sequence of MukF includes a leucine zipper structure and an acidic domain. Mutational analysis revealed that both are required for MukF function. When the MukF protein was overproduced in the wild-type strain, anucleate cells were produced. In contrast, overproduction of either MukE or MukB did not cause the defect. In null mutants for themukF, mukE, andmukB genes, the synchronous initiation of chromosome replication was not affected. The mini-F plasmid was as stably maintained in these mutants as in the wild-type strain. These results indicate that the MukF, MukE, and MukB proteins are involved in the chromosome partitioning steps, but are not required for mini-F plasmid partitioning.     

Identification of two new genes,mukE andmukF,involved in chromosome partitioning inEscherichia coli

We have previously reported that the MukB protein is essential for chromosome partitioning inEscherichia coli and thatmukB mutants produce anucleate cells and are temperature-sensitive for colony formation. ThemukB gene maps at 21 min on theE. coli chromosome andsmtA-mukF-mukE-mukB genes might comprise an operon, which is transcribed in a clockwise direction. Here, we report thatmukF andmukE null mutants are both temperature-sensitive for colony formation and produce anucleate cells even at the permissive temperature. These phenotypes are the same as those observed in themukB null mutant. The primary sequence of MukF includes a leucine zipper structure and an acidic domain. Mutational analysis revealed that both are required for MukF function. When the MukF protein was overproduced in the wild-type strain, anucleate cells were produced. In contrast, overproduction of either MukE or MukB did not cause the defect. In null mutants for themukF, mukE, andmukB genes, the synchronous initiation of chromosome replication was not affected. The mini-F plasmid was as stably maintained in these mutants as in the wild-type strain. These results indicate that the MukF, MukE, and MukB proteins are involved in the chromosome partitioning steps, but are not required for mini-F plasmid partitioning.     

Crystal structure of the MukB hinge domain with coiled‐coil stretches and its functional implications

The structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family proteins are commonly found in the multiprotein complexes involved in chromosome organization, including chromosome condensation and sister chromatid cohesion. These proteins are characterized by forming a V‐shaped homo‐ or heterodimeric structure with two long coiled‐coil arms having two ATPase head domains at the distal ends. The hinge domain, located in the middle of the coiled coil, forms the dimer interface. In addition to being the dimerization module, SMC hinges appear to play other roles, including the gateway function for DNA entry into the cohesin complex. Herein, we report the homodimeric structure of the hinge domain of Escherichia coli MukB, which forms a prokaryotic condensin complex with two non‐SMC subunits, MukE and MukF. In contrast with SMC hinge of Thermotoga maritima which has a sizable central hole at the dimer interface, MukB hinge forms a constricted dimer interface lacking a hole. Under our assay conditions, MukB hinge does not interact with DNA in accordance with the absence of a notable positively charged surface patch. The function of MukB hinge appears to be limited to dimerization of two copies of MukB molecules. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Antagonistic interactions of kleisins and DNA with bacterial Condensin MukB

MukBEF is a bacterial SMC (structural maintenance of chromosome) complex required for faithful chromosome segregation in Escherichia coli. The SMC subunit of the complex, MukB, promotes DNA condensation in vitro and in vivo; however, all three subunits are required for the function of MukBEF. We report here that MukEF disrupts MukB x DNA complex. Preassembled MukBEF was inert in DNA binding or reshaping. Similarly, the association of MukEF with DNA-bound MukB served to displace MukB from DNA. When purified from cells, MukBEF existed as a mixture of MukEF-saturated and unsaturated complexes. The holoenzyme was unstable and could only bind DNA upon dissociation of MukEF. The DNA reshaping properties of unsaturated MukBEF were identical to those of MukB. Furthermore, the unsaturated MukBEF was stable and proficient in DNA binding. These results support the view that kleisins are not directly involved in DNA binding but rather bridge distant DNA-bound MukBs.     

MukE and MukF form two distinct high affinity complexes

The MukBFE complex is essential for chromosome segregation and condensation in Escherichia coli. MukB is functionally related to the structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins. Similar to SMCs, MukB requires accessory proteins (MukE and MukF) to form a functional complex for DNA segregation. MukF is a member of the kleisin family, which includes proteins that commonly mediate the interaction between SMCs and other accessory proteins, suggesting that the similarities between the MukBFE and the SMC complexes extend beyond MukB. Although SMCs have been carefully studied, little is known about the roles of their accessory components. In the present work, we characterize the oligomeric states of MukE and MukF using size exclusion chromatography and analytical ultracentrifugation. MukE self-associates to form dimers (K(D) 18 +/- 3 mum), which in turn interact with the MukF dimer to form two distinct high affinity complexes having 2:2 and 2:4 stoichiometries (F:E). Intermediate complexes are not found, and thus we propose that the equilibrium between these two complexes determines the formation of a functional MukBFE with stoichiometry 2:2:2.     

Mechanics of DNA bridging by bacterial condensin MukBEF in vitro and in singulo

Structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) proteins comprise the core of several specialized complexes that stabilize the global architecture of the chromosomes by dynamically linking distant DNA fragments. This reaction however remains poorly understood giving rise to numerous proposed mechanisms of the proteins. Using two novel assays, we investigated real‐time formation of DNA bridges by bacterial condensin MukBEF. We report that MukBEF can efficiently bridge two DNAs and that this reaction involves multiple steps. The reaction begins with the formation of a stable MukB–DNA complex, which can further capture another protein‐free DNA fragment. The initial tether is unstable but is quickly strengthened by additional MukBs. DNA bridging is modulated but is not strictly dependent on ATP and MukEF. The reaction revealed high preference for right‐handed DNA crossings indicating that bridging involves physical association of MukB with both DNAs. Our data establish a comprehensive view of DNA bridging by MukBEF, which could explain how SMCs establish both intra‐ and interchromosomal links inside the cell and indicate that DNA binding and bridging could be separately regulated.     

Different localization of SeqA-bound nascent DNA clusters and MukF-MukE-MukB complex in Escherichia coli cells

MukF, MukE and MukB proteins form a complex that may participate in the organization of folded sister chromosomes in Escherichia coli. We have found that a MukB-GFPuv4 fusion protein is observed as discrete fluorescent foci, which are localized within cellular spaces occupied by nucleoids, but not at the constriction site of cell division in living cells. In contrast, MukB-GFPuv4 is distributed throughout the whole cell when either MukF or MukE is absent. Statistical analysis revealed that most newborn cells have two foci of mukB-gfpUV4 at one-quarter and three-quarter positions in the cell length and one focus of SeqA-bound nascent DNA at or near the middle of the cell. Subsequently, the single SeqA focus divides into two foci, and then these migrate to the one-quarter and three-quarter positions. Before cell division, most long cells have two SeqA foci and four MukB-GFPuv4 foci. In early stationary phase, SeqA foci disappear, but one or two foci of MukB-GFPuv4 remain. We discuss the reorganization and proper arrangement of folded sister chromosome in the cell quarter positions, which are performed after release from the long-time cohesion of sister chromosomes.     

Structural basis for the MukB‐topoisomerase IV interaction and its functional implications in vivo

Chromosome partitioning in Escherichia coli is assisted by two interacting proteins, topoisomerase (topo) IV and MukB. MukB stimulates the relaxation of negative supercoils by topo IV; to understand the mechanism of their action and to define this functional interplay, we determined the crystal structure of a minimal MukB–topo IV complex to 2.3 Å resolution. The structure shows that the so‐called ‘hinge’ region of MukB forms a heterotetrameric assembly with a C‐terminal DNA binding domain (CTD) on topo IV's ParC subunit. Biochemical studies show that the hinge stimulates topo IV by competing for a site on the CTD that normally represses activity on negatively supercoiled DNA, while complementation tests using mutants implicated in the interaction reveal that the cellular dependency on topo IV derives from a joint need for both strand passage and MukB binding. Interestingly, the configuration of the MukB·topo IV complex sterically disfavours intradimeric interactions, indicating that the proteins may form oligomeric arrays with one another, and suggesting a framework by which MukB and topo IV may collaborate during daughter chromosome disentanglement.     

MukB colocalizes with the oriC region and is required for organization of the two Escherichia coli chromosome arms into separate cell halves

The circular Escherichia coli chromosome is organized by bidirectional replication into two equal left and right arms (replichores). Each arm occupies a separate cell half, with the origin of replication (oriC) at mid-cell. E. coli MukBEF belongs to the ubiquitous family of SMC protein complexes that play key roles in chromosome organization and processing. In mukBEF mutants, viability is restricted to low temperature with production of anucleate cells, reflecting chromosome segregation defects. We show that in mukB mutant cells, the two chromosome arms do not separate into distinct cell halves, but extend from pole to pole with the oriC region located at the old pole. Mutations in topA, encoding topoisomerase I, do not suppress the aberrant positioning of chromosomal loci in mukB cells, despite suppressing the temperature-sensitivity and production of anucleate cells. Furthermore, we show that MukB and the oriC region generally colocalize throughout the cell cycle, even when oriC localization is aberrant. We propose that MukBEF initiates the normal bidirectional organization of the chromosome from the oriC region.     

ATP-induced shrinkage of DNA with MukB protein and the MukBEF complex of Escherichia coli

Fluorescence microscopic observation of individual T4 DNA molecules revealed that the MukBEF complex (bacterial condensin) and its subunit, the MukB (a member of the SMC [structural maintenance of chromosomes] superfamily) homodimer, of Escherichia coli markedly shrunk large DNA molecules in the presence of hydrolyzable ATP. In contrast, in the presence of ADP or ATP-gammaS, the conformation of DNA was almost not changed. This suggests that the ATPase activity of subunit MukB is essential for shrinking large DNA molecules. Stretching experiments on the shrunken DNA molecules in the presence of ATP and MukBEF indicated a cross-bridging interaction between DNA molecules.     

Critical biophysical properties in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa efflux gene regulator MexR are targeted by mutations conferring multidrug resistance

The self‐assembling MexA‐MexB‐OprM efflux pump system, encoded by the mexO operon, contributes to facile resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by actively extruding multiple antimicrobials. MexR negatively regulates the mexO operon, comprising two adjacent MexR binding sites, and is as such highly targeted by mutations that confer multidrug resistance (MDR). To understand how MDR mutations impair MexR function, we studied MexR‐wt as well as a selected set of MDR single mutants distant from the proposed DNA‐binding helix. Although DNA affinity and MexA‐MexB‐OprM repression were both drastically impaired in the selected MexR‐MDR mutants, MexR‐wt bound its two binding sites in the mexO with high affinity as a dimer. In the MexR‐MDR mutants, secondary structure content and oligomerization properties were very similar to MexR‐wt despite their lack of DNA binding. Despite this, the MexR‐MDR mutants showed highly varying stabilities compared with MexR‐wt, suggesting disturbed critical interdomain contacts, because mutations in the DNA‐binding domains affected the stability of the dimer region and vice versa. Furthermore, significant ANS binding to MexR‐wt in both free and DNA‐bound states, together with increased ANS binding in all studied mutants, suggest that a hydrophobic cavity in the dimer region already shown to be involved in regulatory binding is enlarged by MDR mutations. Taken together, we propose that the biophysical MexR properties that are targeted by MDR mutations—stability, domain interactions, and internal hydrophobic surfaces—are also critical for the regulation of MexR DNA binding.     

The Escherichia coli SMC Complex, MukBEF, Shapes Nucleoid Organization Independently of DNA Replication

SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) complexes function ubiquitously in organizing and maintaining chromosomes. Functional fluorescent derivatives of the Escherichia coli SMC complex, MukBEF, form foci that associate with the replication origin region (ori). MukBEF impairment results in mispositioning of ori and other loci in steady-state cells. These observations led to an earlier proposal that MukBEF positions new replicated sister oris. We show here that MukBEF generates and maintains the cellular positioning of chromosome loci independently of DNA replication. Rapid impairment of MukBEF function by depleting a Muk component in the absence of DNA replication leads to loss of MukBEF foci as well as mispositioning of ori and other loci, while rapid Muk synthesis leads to rapid MukBEF focus formation but slow restoration of normal chromosomal locus positioning.     

Mice with endogenous TDP‐43 mutations exhibit gain of splicing function and characteristics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

TDP‐43 (encoded by the gene TARDBP) is an RNA binding protein central to the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, how TARDBP mutations trigger pathogenesis remains unknown. Here, we use novel mouse mutants carrying point mutations in endogenous Tardbp to dissect TDP‐43 function at physiological levels both in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, we find that mutations within the C‐terminal domain of TDP‐43 lead to a gain of splicing function. Using two different strains, we are able to separate TDP‐43 loss‐ and gain‐of‐function effects. TDP‐43 gain‐of‐function effects in these mice reveal a novel category of splicing events controlled by TDP‐43, referred to as “skiptic” exons, in which skipping of constitutive exons causes changes in gene expression. In vivo, this gain‐of‐function mutation in endogenous Tardbp causes an adult‐onset neuromuscular phenotype accompanied by motor neuron loss and neurodegenerative changes. Furthermore, we have validated the splicing gain‐of‐function and skiptic exons in ALS patient‐derived cells. Our findings provide a novel pathogenic mechanism and highlight how TDP‐43 gain of function and loss of function affect RNA processing differently, suggesting they may act at different disease stages.