Purine receptors are required for DHA-mediated neuroprotection against oxygen and glucose deprivation in hippocampal slices

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is important for central nervous system function during pathological states such as ischemia. DHA reduces neuronal injury in experimental brain ischemia; however, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. In the present study, we investigated the effects of DHA on acute hippocampal slices subjected to experimental ischemia by transient oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD) and re-oxygenation and the possible involvement of purinergic receptors as the mechanism underlying DHA-mediated neuroprotection. We observed that cellular viability reduction induced by experimental ischemia as well as cell damage and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) production induced by glutamate (10 mM) were prevented by hippocampal slices pretreated with DHA (5 μM). However, glutamate uptake reduction induced by OGD and re-oxygenation was not prevented by DHA. The beneficial effect of DHA against cellular viability reduction induced by OGD and re-oxygenation was blocked with PPADS (3 μM), a nonselective P2X_1–5 receptor antagonist as well as with a combination of TNP-APT (100 nM) plus brilliant blue (100 nM), which blocked P2X₁, P2X₃, P2X_2/3, and P2X₇ receptors, respectively. Moreover, adenosine receptors blockade with A₁ receptor antagonist DPCPX (100 nM) or with A_2B receptor antagonist alloxazine (100 nM) inhibited DHA-mediated neuroprotection. The addition of an A_2A receptor antagonist ZM241385 (50 nM), or A₃ receptor antagonist VUF5574 (1 μM) was ineffective. Taken together, our results indicated that neuroprotective actions of DHA may depend on P2X, A₁, and A_2B purinergic receptors activation. Our results reinforce the notion that dietary DHA may act as a local purinergic modulator in order to prevent neurodegenerative diseases.     

Neuroprotection afforded by adenosine A2A receptor blockade is modulated by corticotrophin‐releasing factor (CRF) in glutamate injured cortical neurons

In situations of hypoxia, glutamate excitotoxicity induces neuronal death. The release of extracellular adenosine is also triggered and is accompanied by an increase of the stress mediator, corticotrophin‐releasing factor (CRF). Adenosine A_2A receptors contribute to glutamate excitoxicity and their blockade is effective in stress‐induced neuronal deficits, but the involvement of CRF on this effect was never explored. We now evaluated the interaction between A_2A and CRF receptors (CRFR) function, upon glutamate insult. Primary rat cortical neuronal cultures (9 days in vitro) expressing both CRF₁R and CRF₂R were challenged with glutamate (20–1000 μM, 24 h). CRF₁R was found to co‐localize with neuronal markers and CRF₂R to be present in both neuronal and glial cells. The effects of the CRF and A_2A receptors ligands on cell viability were measured using propidium iodide and Syto‐13 fluorescence staining. Glutamate decreased cell viability in a concentration‐dependent manner. Urocortin (10 pM), an agonist of CRF receptors, increased cell survival in the presence of glutamate. This neuroprotective effect was abolished by blocking either CRF₁R or CRF₂R with antalarmin (10 nM) or anti‐Sauvagine‐30 (10 nM), respectively. The blockade of A_2A receptors with a selective antagonist SCH 58261 (50 nM) improved cell viability against the glutamate insult. This effect was dependent on CRF₂R, but not on CRF₁R activation. Overall, these data show a protective role of CRF in cortical neurons, against glutamate‐induced death. The neuroprotection achieved by A_2A receptors blockade requires CRF₂R activation. This interaction between the adenosine and CRF receptors can explain the beneficial effects of using A_2A receptor antagonists against stress‐induced noxious effects.     

Guanosine promotes cytotoxicity via adenosine receptors and induces apoptosis in temozolomide-treated A172 glioma cells

Gliomas are a malignant tumor group whose patients have survival rates around 12 months. Among the treatments are the alkylating agents as temozolomide (TMZ), although gliomas have shown multiple resistance mechanisms for chemotherapy. Guanosine (GUO) is an endogenous nucleoside involved in extracellular signaling that presents neuroprotective effects and also shows the effect of inducing differentiation in cancer cells. The chemotherapy allied to adjuvant drugs are being suggested as a novel approach in gliomas treatment. In this way, this study evaluated whether GUO presented cytotoxic effects on human glioma cells as well as GUO effects in association with a classical chemotherapeutic compound, TMZ. Classical parameters of tumor aggressiveness, as alterations on cell viability, type of cell death, migration, and parameters of glutamatergic transmission, were evaluated. GUO (500 and 1000 μM) decreases the A172 glioma cell viability after 24, 48, or 72 h of treatment. TMZ alone or GUO plus TMZ also reduced glioma cell viability similarly. GUO combined with TMZ showed a potentiation effect of increasing apoptosis in A172 glioma cells, and a similar pattern was observed in reducing mitochondrial membrane potential. GUO per se did not elevate the acidic vesicular organelles occurrence, but TMZ or GUO plus TMZ increased this autophagy hallmark. GUO did not alter glutamate transport per se, but it prevented TMZ-induced glutamate release. GUO or TMZ did not alter glutamine synthetase activity. Pharmacological blockade of glutamate receptors did not change GUO effect on glioma viability. GUO cytotoxicity was partially prevented by adenosine receptor (A₁R and A_2AR) ligands. These results point to a cytotoxic effect of GUO on A172 glioma cells and suggest an anticancer effect of GUO as a putative adjuvant treatment, whose mechanism needs to be unraveled.     

Mechanism of guanosine-induced neuroprotection in rat hippocampal slices submitted to oxygen-glucose deprivation

Guanine derivates have been implicated in many relevant extracellular roles, such as modulation of glutamate transmission, protecting neurons against excitotoxic damage. Guanine derivatives are spontaneously released to the extracellular space from cultured astrocytes during oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) and may act as trophic factors, glutamate receptors blockers or glutamate transport modulators, thus promoting neuroprotection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanisms involved in the neuroprotective role of the nucleoside guanosine in rat hippocampal slices submitted to OGD, identifying a putative extracellular binding site and the intracellular signaling pathways related to guanosine-induced neuroprotection. Cell damage to hippocampal slices submitted to 15 min of OGD followed by 2 h of reperfusion was decreased by the addition of guanosine (100 microM) or guanosine-5'-monophosphate (GMP, 100 microM). The neuroprotective effect of guanosine was not altered by the addition of adenosine receptor antagonists, nucleosides transport inhibitor, glutamate receptor antagonists, glutamate transport inhibitors, and a non-selective Na(+) and Ca(2+) channel blocker. However, in a Ca(2+)-free medium (by adding EGTA), guanosine was ineffective. Nifedipine (a Ca(2+) channel blocker) increased the neuroprotective effect of guanosine and 4-aminopyridine, a K(+) channel blocker, reversed the neuroprotective effect of guanosine. Evaluation of the intracellular signaling pathways associated with guanosine-induced neuroprotection showed the involvement of PKA, PKC, MEK and PI-3 K pathways, but not CaMKII. Therefore, this study shows guanosine is acting via K(+) channels activation, depending on extracellular Ca(2+) levels and via modulation of the PKA, PKC, MEK and/or PI-3 K pathways.     

Swim training attenuates oxidative damage and promotes neuroprotection in cerebral cortical slices submitted to oxygen glucose deprivation

Although it is well known that regular exercise may promote neuroprotection, the mechanisms underlying this effect are still not fully understood. We investigated if swim training promotes neuroprotection by potentiating antioxidant pathways, thereby decreasing the effects of oxidative stress on glutamate and nitric oxide release. Male Wistar rats (n=36) were evenly randomized into a trained group (TRA) (5 days/week, 8 weeks, 30 min) and a sedentary group (SED). Forty‐eight hours after the last session of exercise, animals were killed and brain was collected for in vitro ischemia. Cortical slices were divided into two groups: a group in which oxidative stress was induced by oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD), and a group of non‐deprived controls (nOGD). Interestingly, exercise by itself increased superoxide dismutase activity (nOGD, SED vs. TRA animals) with no effect on pro‐oxidative markers. In fact, TRA‐OGD slices showed lowered levels of lactate dehydrogenase when compared with SED‐OGD controls, reinforcing the idea that exercise affords a neuroprotective effect. We also demonstrated that exercise decreased glutamate and nitrite release as well as lipid membrane damage in the OGD cortical slices. Our data suggest that under conditions of metabolic stress, swim training prevents oxidative damage caused by glutamate and nitric oxide release.     

Atorvastatin Prevents Glutamate Uptake Reduction Induced by Quinolinic Acid Via MAPKs Signaling

Statins have been shown to promote neuroprotection in a wide range of neurological disorders. However, the mechanisms involved in such effects of statins are not fully understood. Quinolinic acid (QA) is a neurotoxin that induces seizures when infused in vivo and promotes glutamatergic excitotoxicity in the central nervous system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the putative glutamatergic mechanisms and the intracellular signaling pathways involved in the atorvastatin neuroprotective effects against QA toxicity. Atorvastatin (10 mg/kg) treatment for 7 days prevented the QA-induced decrease in glutamate uptake, but had no effect on increased glutamate release induced by QA. Moreover, atorvastatin treatment increased the phosphorylation of ERK1 and prevented the decrease in Akt phosphorylation induced by QA. Neither atorvastatin treatment nor QA infusion altered glutamine synthetase activity or the levels of phosphorylation of p38^MAPK or JNK1/2 during the evaluation. Inhibition of MEK/ERK signaling pathway, but not PI3K/Akt signaling, abolished the neuroprotective effect of atorvastatin against QA-induced decrease in glutamate uptake. Our data suggest that atorvastatin protective effects against QA toxicity are related to modulation of glutamate transporters via MAPK/ERK signaling pathway.     

Neuroprotection by adenosine in the brain: From A<Subscript>1</Subscript> receptor activation to A<Subscript>2A</Subscript> receptor blockade

Adenosine is a neuromodulator that operates via the most abundant inhibitory adenosine A₁ receptors (A₁Rs) and the less abundant, but widespread, facilitatory A_2ARs. It is commonly assumed that A₁Rs play a key role in neuroprotection since they decrease glutamate release and hyperpolarize neurons. In fact, A₁R activation at the onset of neuronal injury attenuates brain damage, whereas its blockade exacerbates damage in adult animals. However, there is a down-regulation of central A₁Rs in chronic noxious situations. In contrast, A_2ARs are up-regulated in noxious brain conditions and their blockade confers robust brain neuroprotection in adult animals. The brain neuroprotective effect of A_2AR antagonists is maintained in chronic noxious brain conditions without observable peripheral effects, thus justifying the interest of A_2AR antagonists as novel protective agents in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinsons and Alzheimers disease, ischemic brain damage and epilepsy. The greater interest of A_2AR blockade compared to A₁R activation does not mean that A₁R activation is irrelevant for a neuroprotective strategy. In fact, it is proposed that coupling A_2AR antagonists with strategies aimed at bursting the levels of extracellular adenosine (by inhibiting adenosine kinase) to activate A₁Rs might constitute the more robust brain neuroprotective strategy based on the adenosine neuromodulatory system. This strategy should be useful in adult animals and especially in the elderly (where brain pathologies are prevalent) but is not valid for fetus or newborns where the impact of adenosine receptors on brain damage is different.     

Guanosine Exerts Neuroprotective Effect in an Experimental Model of Acute Ammonia Intoxication

The nucleoside guanosine (GUO) increases glutamate uptake by astrocytes and acts as antioxidant, thereby providing neuroprotection against glutamatergic excitotoxicity, as we have recently demonstrated in an animal model of chronic hepatic encephalopathy. Here, we investigated the neuroprotective effect of GUO in an acute ammonia intoxication model. Adult male Wistar rats received an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of vehicle or GUO 60 mg/kg, followed 20 min later by an i.p. injection of vehicle or 550 mg/kg of ammonium acetate. Afterwards, animals were observed for 45 min, being evaluated as normal, coma (i.e., absence of corneal reflex), or death status. In a second cohort of rats, video-electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings were performed. In a third cohort of rats, the following were measured: (i) plasma levels of glucose, transaminases, and urea; (ii) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of ammonia, glutamine, glutamate, and alanine; (iii) glutamate uptake in brain slices; and (iv) brain redox status and glutamine synthetase activity in cerebral cortex. GUO drastically reduced the lethality rate and the duration of coma. Animals treated with GUO had improved EEG traces, decreased CSF levels of glutamate and alanine, lowered oxidative stress in the cerebral cortex, and increased glutamate uptake by astrocytes in brain slices compared with animals that received vehicle prior to ammonium acetate administration. This study provides new evidence on mechanisms of guanine-derived purines in their potential modulation of glutamatergic system, contributing to GUO neuroprotective effects in a rodent model of by acute ammonia intoxication.     

Modulation of the Akt/Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by A3 adenosine receptor

Downstream A₃ receptor signalling plays an important role in the regulation of cell death and proliferation. Therefore, it is important to determine the molecular pathways involved through A₃ receptor stimulation. The phosphatidylinositide-3-OH kinase (PI3K)/Akt and the Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK/ERK) kinase (MEK)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways have central roles in the regulation of cell survival and proliferation. The crosstalk between these two pathways has also been investigated. The focus of this review centres on downstream mediators of A₃ adenosine receptor signalling.     

Adenosine A1 and A2A receptors are involved on guanosine protective effects against oxidative burst and mitochondrial dysfunction induced by 6-OHDA in striatal slices

6-Hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) is the most used toxin in experimental Parkinson’s disease (PD) models. 6-OHDA shows high affinity for the dopamine transporter and once inside the neuron, it accumulates and undergoes non-enzymatic auto-oxidation, promoting reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and selective damage of catecholaminergic neurons. In this way, our group has established a 6-OHDA in vitro protocol with rat striatal slices as a rapid and effective model for screening of new drugs with protective effects against PD. We have shown that co-incubation with guanosine (GUO, 100 μM) prevented the 6-OHDA-induced damage in striatal slices. As the exact GUO mechanism of action remains unknown, the aim of this study was to investigate if adenosine A₁ (A₁R) and/or A_2A receptors (A_2AR) are involved on GUO protective effects on striatal slices. Pre-incubation with DPCPX, an A₁R antagonist prevented guanosine effects on 6-OHDA-induced ROS formation and mitochondrial membrane potential depolarization, while CCPA, an A₁R agonist, did not alter GUO effects. Regarding A_2AR, the antagonist SCH58261 had similar protective effect as GUO in ROS formation and mitochondrial membrane potential. Additionally, SCH58261 did not affect GUO protective effects. The A_2AR agonist CGS21680, although, completely blocked GUO effects. Finally, the A₁R antagonist DPCPX, and the A_2AR agonist CGS21680 also abolished the preventive guanosine effect on 6-OHDA-induced ATP levels decrease. These results reinforce previous evidence for a putative interaction of GUO with A₁R-A_2AR heteromer as its molecular target and clearly indicate a dependence on adenosine receptors modulation to GUO protective effect.

     

Atorvastatin prevents cell damage via modulation of oxidative stress,glutamate uptake and glutamine synthetase activity in hippocampal slices subjected to oxygen/glucose deprivation

Oxygen–glucose deprivation (OGD) in brain cells increases extracellular glutamate concentration leading to excitotoxicity. Glutamate uptake from the synaptic cleft is carried out by glutamate transporters, which are likely to be modulated by oxidative stress. Therefore, oxidative stress is associated with reduced activity of glutamate transporters and glutamine synthetase, thus increasing extracellular glutamate levels that may aggravate damage to brain cells. Atorvastatin, a cholesterol-lowering agent, has been shown to exert neuroprotective effects. The aim of this study was to investigate if in vivo atorvastatin treatment would have protective effects against hippocampal slices subjected to OGD, ex vivo. Atorvastatin pretreatment promoted increased cell viability after OGD and reoxygenation of hippocampal slices. Atorvastatin-induced neuroprotection may be related to diminished oxidative stress, since it prevented OGD-induced decrement of non-proteic thiols (NPSH) levels and increase in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Atorvastatin pretreatment also prevented the OGD-induced decrease in glutamate uptake and glutamine synthetase activity, although it had no effect on OGD-induced excitatory aminoacids release. Addition of cholesterol before OGD and reoxygenation, abolished the protective effect of atorvastatin on cellular viability as well as on glutamate uptake and glutamine synthetase activity. Therefore, atorvastatin is capable of preventing OGD-induced cell death, an effect achieved due to modulation of glutamate uptake and glutamine synthetase activity, and associated with diminished oxidative stress. Additionally, atorvastatin effects were dependent on its action on cholesterol synthesis inhibition. Thus, atorvastatin might be a useful strategy in the prevention of glutamate exitotoxicity involved in brain injuries such as vascular disorders.     

Cold‐inducible protein RBM3 mediates hypothermic neuroprotection against neurotoxin rotenone via inhibition on MAPK signalling

Mild hypothermia and its key product, cold‐inducible protein RBM3, possess robust neuroprotective effects against various neurotoxins. However, we previously showed that mild hypothermia fails to attenuate the neurotoxicity from MPP⁺, one of typical neurotoxins related to the increasing risk of Parkinson disease (PD). To better understand the role of mild hypothermia and RBM3 in PD progression, another known PD‐related neurotoxin, rotenone (ROT) was utilized in this study. Using immunoblotting, cell viability assays and TUNEL staining, we revealed that mild hypothermia (32°C) significantly reduced the apoptosis induced by ROT in human neuroblastoma SH‐SY5Y cells, when compared to normothermia (37°C). Meanwhile, the overexpression of RBM3 in SH‐SY5Y cells mimicked the neuroprotective effects of mild hypothermia on ROT‐induced cytotoxicity. Upon ROT stimulation, MAPK signalling like p38, JNK and ERK, and AMPK and GSK‐3β signalling were activated. When RBM3 was overexpressed, only the activation of p38, JNK and ERK signalling was inhibited, leaving AMPK and GSK‐3β signalling unaffected. Similarly, mild hypothermia also inhibited the activation of MAPKs induced by ROT. Lastly, it was demonstrated that the MAPK (especially p38 and ERK) inhibition by their individual inhibitors significantly decreased the neurotoxicity of ROT in SH‐SY5Y cells. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that RBM3 mediates mild hypothermia‐related neuroprotection against ROT by inhibiting the MAPK signalling of p38, JNK and ERK.     

Adenosine A1 and A3 receptor agonists reduce hypoxic injury through the involvement of P38 MAPK

Activation of either the A₁ adenosine receptor (A₁R) or the A₃ adenosine receptor (A₃R), by their specific agonists CCPA and Cl-IB-MECA, respectively, protects cardiac cells in culture against ischemic injury. Yet the full protective mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we therefore examined the involvement of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) phosphorylation in this protective intracellular signaling mechanism. Furthermore, we investigated whether p38 MAPK phosphorylation occurs upstream or downstream from the opening of mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium (K_ATP) channels. The role of p38 MAPK activation in the intracellular signaling process was studied in cultured cardiomyocytes subjected to hypoxia, that were pretreated with CCPA or Cl-IB-MECA or diazoxide (a mitochondrial K_ATP channel opener) with and without SB203580 (a specific inhibitor of phosphorylated p38 MAPK). Cardiomyocytes were also pretreated with anisomycin (p38 MAPK activator) with and without 5-hydroxy decanoic acid (5HD) (a mitochondrial K_ATP channel blocker). SB203580 together with the CCPA, Cl-IB-MECA or diazoxide abrogated the protection against hypoxia as shown by the level of ATP, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, and propidium iodide (PI) staining. Anisomycin protected the cardiomyocytes against ischemic injury and this protection was abrogated by SB203580 but not by 5HD. Conclusions Activation of A₁R or A₃R by CCPA or Cl-IB-MECA, respectively, protects cardiomyocytes from hypoxia via phosphorylation of p38 MAPK, which is located downstream from the mitochondrial K_ATP channel opening. Elucidating the signaling pathway by which adenosine receptor agonists protect cardiomyocytes from hypoxic damage, will facilitate the development of anti ischemic drugs.     

Estrogen Receptor (ER)-α36 Is Involved in Estrogen- and Tamoxifen-Induced Neuroprotective Effects in Ischemic Stroke Models

The neuroprotection by estrogen (E2) and tamoxifen is well documented in experimental stroke models; however, the exact mechanism is unclear. A membrane-based estrogen receptor, ER-α36, has been identified. Postmenopausal-levels of E2 act through ER-α36 to induce osteoclast apoptosis due to a prolonged activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) signaling. We hypothesized that ER-α36 may play a role in the neuroprotective activities of estrogen and tamoxifen. Here, we studied ER-α36 expression in the brain, as well as its neuroprotective effects against oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD) in PC12 cells. We found that ER-α36 was expressed in both rat and human brain. In addition, OGD-induced cell death was prevented by l nmol/L 17β-estradiol (E2β). E2β activates the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway in PC12 cells under basal and OGD conditions by interacting with ER-α36 and also induces ER-α36 expression. Low-dose of tamoxifen up-regulated ER-α36 expression and enhanced neuronal survival in an ovariectomized ischemic stroke model. Furthermore, low-dose of tamoxifen enhanced neuroprotective effects by modulating activates or suppress ER-α36. Our results thus demonstrated that ER-α36 is involved in neuroprotective activities mediated by both estrogen and tamoxifen.     

Combination therapy with bone marrow stromal cells and FK506 enhanced amelioration of ischemic brain damage in rats

AimsWe previously reported that cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 2 (CysLT₂) mediates ischemic astrocyte injury, and leukotriene D₄-activated CysLT₂ receptor up-regulates the water channel aquaporin 4 (AQP4). Here we investigated the mechanism underlying CysLT₂ receptor-mediated ischemic astrocyte injury induced by 4-h oxygen-glucose deprivation and 24-h recovery (OGD/R).Main methodsPrimary cultures of rat astrocytes were treated by OGD/R to construct the cell injury model. AQP4 expression was inhibited by small interfering RNA (siRNA). The expressions of AQP4 and CysLTs receptors, and the MAPK signaling pathway were determined.Key findingsOGD/R induced astrocyte injury, and increased expression of the CysLT₂ (but not CysLT₁) receptor and AQP4. OGD/R-induced cell injury and AQP4 up-regulation were inhibited by a CysLT₂ receptor antagonist (Bay cysLT2) and a non-selective CysLT receptor antagonist (Bay u9773), but not by a CysLT₁ receptor antagonist (montelukast). Knockdown of AQP4 by siRNA attenuated OGD/R injury. Furthermore, OGD/R increased phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38, whose inhibitors relieved the cell injury and AQP4 up-regulation.SignificanceThe CysLT₂ receptor mediates AQP4 up-regulation in astrocytes, and up-regulated AQP4 leads to OGD/R-induced injury, which results from activation of the ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK pathways.     

Androgens activate mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling: role in neuroprotection

Recent evidence indicates that testosterone is neuroprotective, however, the underlying mechanism(s) remains to be elucidated. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that androgens induce mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling in neurons, which subsequently drives neuroprotection. We observed that testosterone and its non-aromatizable metabolite dihydrotestosterone (DHT) rapidly and transiently activate MAPK in cultured hippocampal neurons, as evidenced by phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-1 and ERK-2. Importantly, pharmacological suppression of MAPK/ERK signaling blocked androgen-mediated neuroprotection against beta-amyloid toxicity. Androgen activation of MAPK/ERK and neuroprotection also was observed in PC12 cells stably transfected with androgen receptor (AR), but in neither wild-type nor empty vector-transfected PC12 cells. Downstream of ERK phosphorylation, we observed that DHT sequentially increases p90 kDa ribosomal S6 kinase (Rsk) phosphorylation and phosphorylation-dependent inactivation of Bcl-2-associated death protein (Bad). Prevention of androgen-induced phosphorylation of Rsk and Bad blocked androgen neuroprotection. These findings demonstrate AR-dependent androgen activation of MAPK/ERK signaling in neurons, and specifically identify a neuroprotective pathway involving downstream activation of Rsk and inactivation of Bad. Elucidation of androgen-mediated neural signaling cascades will provide important insights into the mechanisms of androgen action in brain, and may present a framework for therapeutic intervention of age-related neurodegenerative disorders.     

5′‐N‐ethylcarboxamide induces IL‐6 expression via MAPKs and NF‐κB activation through Akt,Ca2+/PKC,cAMP signaling pathways in mouse embryonic stem cells

Many studies suggest that adenosine modulates cell responses in a wide array of tissues through potent and selective regulation of cytokine production. This study examined the effects of adenosine on interleukin (IL)‐6 expression and its related signal pathways in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. In this study, the adenosine analogue 5′‐N‐ethylcarboxamide (NECA) increased IL‐6 protein expression level. Mouse ES cells expressed the A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ adenosine receptors (ARs), whose expression levels were increased by NECA and NECA‐induced increase of IL‐6 mRNA expression or secretion level was inhibited by the non‐specific AR inhibitor, caffeine. NECA increased Akt and protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation, intracellular Ca²⁺ and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels, which were blocked by caffeine. On the other hand, NECA‐induced IL‐6 secretion was partially inhibited by Akt inhibitor, bisindolylmaleimide I (PKC inhibitor), SQ 22536 (adenylate cyclate inhibitor) and completely blocked by the 3 inhibitor combination treatment. In addition, NECA increased mitogen activated protein kinase' (MAPK) phosphorylation, which were partially inhibited by the Akt inhibitor, bisindolylmaleimide I, and SQ 22536 and completely blocked by the 3 inhibitor combination treatment. NECA‐induced increases of IL‐6 protein expression and secretion levels were inhibited by MAPK inhibition. NECA‐induced increase of nuclear factor (NF)‐κB phosphorylation was inhibited by MAPK inhibitors. NECA also increased cAMP response element‐binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation, which was blocked by MAPK or NF‐κB inhibitors. Indeed, NECA‐induced increase of IL‐6 protein expression and secretion was blocked by NF‐κB inhibitors. In conclusion, NECA stimulated IL‐6 expression via MAPK and NF‐κB activation through Akt, Ca²⁺/PKC, and cAMP signaling pathways in mouse ES cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 219: 752–759, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Insulin/PI3K signaling protects dentate neurons from oxygen–glucose deprivation in organotypic slice cultures

It is known that ischemia/reperfusion induces neurodegeneration in the hippocampus in a subregion‐dependent manner. This study investigated the mechanism of selective resistance/vulnerability to oxygen–glucose deprivation (OGD) using mouse organotypic hippocampal cultures. Analysis of propidium iodide uptake showed that OGD‐induced duration‐ and subregion‐dependent neuronal injury. When compared with the CA1–3 subregions, dentate neuronal survival was more sensitive to inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling under basal conditions. Dentate neuronal sensitivity to PI3K/Akt signaling activation was inversely related to its vulnerability to OGD‐induced injury; insulin/insulin‐like growth factor 1 pre‐treatment conferred neuroprotection to dentate neurons via activation of PI3K/Akt signaling. In contrast, CA1 and CA3 neurons were less sensitive to disruptions of endogenous PI3K/Akt signaling and protective effects of insulin/insulin‐like growth factor 1, but more vulnerable to OGD. OGD‐induced injury in CA1 was reduced by inhibition of NMDA receptor or mitogen‐activated protein kinase signaling, and was prevented by blocking NMDA receptor in the presence of insulin. The CA2 subregion was distinctive in its response to glutamate, OGD, and insulin, compared with other CA subregions. CA2 neurons were sensitive to the protective effects of insulin against OGD‐induced injury, but more resistant to glutamate. Distinctive distribution of insulin receptor β and basal phospho‐Akt was detected in our slice cultures. Our results suggest a role for insulin signaling in subregional resistance/vulnerability to cerebral ischemia.     

C2-substituted quinazolinone derivatives exhibit A1 and/or A2A adenosine receptor affinities in the low micromolar range

Antagonists of the adenosine receptors (A₁ and A_2A subtypes) are widely researched as potential drug candidates for their role in Parkinson’s disease-related cognitive deficits (A₁ subtype), motor dysfunction (A_2A subtype) and to exhibit neuroprotective properties (A_2A subtype). Previously the benzo-α-pyrone based derivative, 3-phenyl-1H-2-benzopyran-1-one, was found to display both A₁ and A_2A adenosine receptor affinity in the low micromolar range. Prompted by this, the α-pyrone core was structurally modified to explore related benzoxazinone and quinazolinone homologues previously unknown as adenosine receptor antagonists. Overall, the C2-substituted quinazolinone analogues displayed superior A₁ and A_2A adenosine receptor affinity over their C2-substituted benzoxazinone homologues. The benzoxazinones were devoid of A_2A adenosine receptor binding, with only two compounds displaying A₁ adenosine receptor affinity. In turn, the quinazolinones displayed varying degrees of affinity (low micromolar range) towards the A₁ and A_2A adenosine receptor subtypes. The highest A₁ adenosine receptor affinity and selectivity were favoured by methyl para-substitution of phenyl ring B (A₁K_i = 2.50 μM). On the other hand, 3,4-dimethoxy substitution of phenyl ring B afforded the best A_2A adenosine receptor binding (A_2AK_i = 2.81 μM) among the quinazolinones investigated. In conclusion, the quinazolinones are ideal lead compounds for further structural optimization to gain improved adenosine receptor affinity, which may find therapeutic relevance in Parkinson’s disease-associated cognitive deficits and motor dysfunctions as well as exerting neuroprotective properties.     

Dual target strategy: combining distinct non‐dopaminergic treatments reduces neuronal cell loss and synergistically modulates l‐DOPA‐induced rotational behavior in a rodent model of Parkinson's disease

The glutamate metabotropic receptor 5 (mGluR5) and the adenosine A_2A receptor (A_2AR) represent major non‐dopaminergic therapeutic targets in Parkinson's disease (PD) to improve motor symptoms and slow down/revert disease progression. The 6‐hydroxydopamine rat model of PD was used to determine/compare the neuroprotective and behavioral impacts of single and combined administration of one mGluR5 antagonist, 2‐methyl‐6‐(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP), and two A_2AR antagonists, (E)‐phosphoric acid mono‐[3‐[8‐[2‐(3‐methoxyphenyl)vinyl]‐7‐methyl‐2,6‐dioxo‐1‐prop‐2‐ynyl‐1,2,6,7‐tetrahydropurin‐3‐yl]propyl] (MSX‐3) and 8‐ethoxy‐9‐ethyladenine (ANR 94). Chronic treatment with MPEP or MSX‐3 alone, but not with ANR 94, reduced the toxin‐induced loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. Combining MSX‐3 and MPEP further improved the neuroprotective effect of either antagonists. At the behavioral level, ANR 94 and MSX‐3 given alone significantly potentiated l ‐DOPA‐induced turning behavior. Combination of either A_2AR antagonists with MPEP synergistically increased L‐DOPA‐induced turning. This effect was dose‐dependent and required subthreshold drug concentration, which per se had no motor stimulating effect. Our findings suggest that co‐treatment with A_2AR and mGluR5 antagonists provides better therapeutic benefits than those produced by either drug alone. Our study sheds some light on the efficacy and advantages of combined non‐dopaminergic PD treatment using low drug concentration and establishes the basis for in‐depth studies to identify optimal doses at which these drugs reach highest efficacy.