Comparison of eight commercially available kits for DNA extraction from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues

A proper extraction method from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks is essential to obtain DNA of satisfactory quality/quantity. We compared the effectiveness of eight commercially available kits for DNA extraction based on 10 FFPE tissues. Kits differed significantly in terms of DNA yield, purity, and quality. Using the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen) and the ReliaPrep FFPE gDNA Miniprep System (Promega), we obtained DNA of the highest quality and acceptable quantity. We also demonstrated that overnight digestion of samples usually improved DNA yield and/or purity. For precious or limited material, double elution is recommended for obtaining up to 42% higher amount of DNA.     

An evaluation of commercial DNA extraction kits for the isolation of bacterial spore DNA from soil

Aims: To evaluate six commercial DNA extraction kits for their ability to isolate PCR‐quality DNA from Bacillus spores in various soil samples. Methods and Results: Three soils were inoculated with various amounts of Bacillus cereus spores to simulate an outbreak or intentional release of the threat agent Bacillus anthracis. DNA was isolated from soil samples using six commercial DNA extraction kits. Extraction and purification efficiencies were assessed using a duplex real‐time PCR assay that included an internal positive control. The FastDNA^® SPIN kit for Soil showed the highest DNA extraction yield, while the E.Z.N.A.^® Soil DNA and PowerSoil^® DNA Isolation kits showed the highest efficiencies in removing PCR inhibitors from loam soil extracts. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that commercially available extraction kits can be used to extract PCR‐quality DNA from bacterial spores in soil. The selection of an appropriate extraction kit should depend on the characteristics of the soil sample and the intended downstream application. Significance and Impact of the Study: The results of this study aid in the selection of an appropriate DNA extraction kit for a given soil sample. Its application could expedite sample processing for real‐time PCR detection of a pathogen in soil.     

Evaluation of the impact of DNA extraction methods on BAC bacterial community composition measured by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis

Aims: The impact of DNA extraction methods on biological activated carbon (BAC) DNA yield and bacterial community was evaluated. Methods and Results: Three different DNA extraction methods were compared: method a, method b and method c. Method c with ultrasonic pretreatment improved cell lysis efficiency (from 34% to 87%) and DNA yield [from 10·58 μg g^?1 (dry wt) of carbon to 21·42 μg g^?1 (dry wt) of carbon]. denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles obtained by method c recovered the five seeded bacteria (Bacillus subtilis Strain WSO 6, Pseudomonas putida Strain WSO 7, Acinetobacter lwoffii WSO 10, Pseudomonas pertucinogena WSO 11 and Brevibacterium mcbrellneri WSO 13). Conclusions: The results showed method c with ultrasonic pretreatment was the most successful for the analysis of BAC bacterial community because it was effective in the detachment of bacteria and cell lysis, thereby resulting in good yields. Significance and Impact of Study: These results must be taken into consideration when extracting DNA for analysing BAC bacterial community.     

三种粪便总DNA提取方法的比较

目的比较不同粪便总DNA提取方法对肠道菌群多样性研究的影响。方法采用Bead beating法、化学裂解法和QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit提取同一份人粪便样品的总DNA,对比3种方法的DNA得率和16S rRNA基因V3区的变性梯度凝胶电泳（DGGE）图谱。结果Bead beating法的DNA得率约是其他2种方法的2倍;3种方法得到的DGGE图谱的Dice相似性为60％～70％,2条优势条带只出现在Bead beating法图谱中。在2～5min的Bead beating法击打时间里,DNA得率随击打时间的延长有一定的增加,但DGGE图谱无显著变化。结论不同的DNA提取方法会影响菌群的多样性分析。比较其他2种方法,Bead beating的裂解效率更高,能够检测到更多种类的细菌,更合适肠道菌群组成的分子研究。     

An efficient method for DNA extraction from cyanobacteria isolated from hypersaline and marine environments

Cyanobacteria are ancient organisms surviving on the earth due to their simple nutritional requirements and ability to produce distinct secondary metabolites that can combat detrimental environmental impacts. In order to understand these abilities of cyanobacteria at the molecular level, it is necessary to extract high‐quality genomic DNA. However, the presence of secondary metabolites and exopolysaccharides hinders the DNA extraction from these organisms, especially from hypersaline environments. Here we have developed and compared a new method with two known methods of DNA extraction from environmental isolates. The results clearly indicate that the new optimized method yielded large amount of DNA with high purity. Additionally, the extracted DNA showed reduced degradation and excellent overall quality, which can be used directly for downstream purposes such as PCR and sequencing.     

Comparison of five commercial DNA extraction kits for the recovery of Yersinia pestis DNA from bacterial suspensions and spiked environmental samples

Aim:  To evaluate commercial DNA extraction kits for their ability to isolate DNA from Yersinia pestis suspensions and spiked environmental samples.
Methods and Results:  Five commercially available DNA extraction kits were evaluated: the ChargeSwitch gDNA Mini Bacteria Kit, the IT 1-2-3 Sample DNA Purification Kit, the MasterPure Complete DNA and RNA Purification Kit, the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit and the UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit. The extraction methods were performed upon six Y. pestis strains and spiked environmental specimens, including three swab types and one powder type. Taqman real-time PCR analysis revealed that the use of the MasterPure kit resulted in DNA with the most consistently positive results and the lowest limit of detection from Y. pestis suspensions and spiked environmental samples.
Conclusion:  Comparative evaluations of the five commercial DNA extraction methods indicated that the MasterPure kit was superior for the isolation of PCR-amplifiable DNA from Y. pestis suspensions and spiked environmental samples.
Significance and Impact of the Study:  The results of this study can assist diagnostic laboratories with selecting the best extraction method for processing environmental specimens for subsequent detection of Y. pestis by real-time PCR.     

一种适用于PCR反应的酵母菌、无绿藻及丝状真菌DNA提取方法

目的 介绍一种从酵母、无绿藻及丝状真菌中提取DNA以用于PCR反应的方法。方法 所用菌种包括临床分离的未知菌株和保藏菌株共23株：未知酵母菌（5株）、真皮毛孢子菌（1株）、糠秕马拉色菌（1株）、季也蒙念珠菌（5株）、未知丝状真菌（6株）、无绿藻（1株）、烟曲霉（2株）、拟青霉菌（1株）、茎点霉（1株）。用溶细胞酶（lyticase）结合Biospin真菌基因组DNA提取试剂盒提取基因组DNA,A260／A280检测纯度并计算质量浓度,用真菌通用引物ITS1／ITS4扩增真菌核糖体基因（rDNA）内转录间区ITS基因,经PCR扩增检验所提取的DNA质量。结果 成功提取所有23株真菌基因组DNA,其纯度及质量浓度能满足PCR反应的要求。结论 用溶细胞酶结合Biospin真菌基因组DNA提取试剂盒从酵母菌、无绿藻及丝状真菌提取的DNA可用于PCR反应。     

Comparisons of direct extraction methods of microbial DNA from different paddy soils

Molecular analyses for the study of soil microbial communities often depend on the direct extraction of DNA from soils. The present work compares the effectiveness of three different methods of extracting microbial DNA from seven different paddy soils. Comparison among different DNA extraction methods against different paddy soil samples revealed a marked variation in DNA yields from 3.18–20.17 μg DNA/g of dry soil. However, irrespective of the soil samples and extraction methods the DNA fragment size was >10 kb. Among the methods evaluated, method-C (chemical–enzymatic–mechanical) had better cell lysis efficiency and DNA yield. After purification of crude DNA by Purification Kit, A₂₆₀/A₂₃₀ and A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ ratios of the DNA obtained by method-C reached up to 2.27 and 1.89, respectively, sustaining the efficacy of this technique in removing humic acid, protein and other contaminants. Results of the comprehensive evaluation of DNA extraction methods suggest that method-C is superior to other two methods (chemical–enzymatic and chemical–mechanical), and was the best choice for extraction of total DNA from soil samples. Since soil type and microbial community characteristics influence DNA recovery, this study provides guidance for choosing appropriate extraction and purification methods according to experimental goals.     

Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for isolation and purification of bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils

Molecular characterization of the microbial populations of soils and sediments contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is often a first step in assessing intrinsic biodegradation potential. However, soils are problematic for molecular analysis owing to the presence of organic matter, such as humic acids. Furthermore, the presence of contaminants, such as PAHs, can cause further challenges to DNA extraction, quantification, and amplification. The goal of our study was to compare the effectiveness of four commercial soil DNA extraction kits (UltraClean Soil DNA Isolation kit, PowerSoil DNA Isolation kit, PowerMax Soil DNA Isolation kit, and FastDNA SPIN kit) to extract pure, high-quality bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils. Six different contaminated soils were used to determine if there were any biases among the kits due to soil properties or level of contamination. Extracted DNA was used as a template for bacterial 16S rDNA and eukaryotic 18S rDNA amplifications, and PCR products were subsequently analyzed using denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis (DGGE). We found that the FastDNA SPIN kit provided significantly higher DNA yields for all soils; however, it also resulted in the highest levels of humic acid contamination. Soil texture and organic carbon content of the soil did not affect the DNA yield of any kit. Moreover, a liquid-liquid extraction of the DNA extracts found no residual PAHs, indicating that all kits were effective at removing contaminants in the extraction process. Although the PowerSoil DNA Isolation kit gave relatively low DNA yields, it provided the highest quality DNA based on successful amplification of both bacterial and eukaryotic DNA for all six soils. DGGE fingerprints among the kits were dramatically different for both bacterial and eukaryotic DNA. The PowerSoil DNA Isolation kit revealed multiple bands for each soil and provided the most consistent DGGE profiles among replicates for both bacterial and eukaryotic DNA.     

沼气池污泥微生物总DNA提取方法的比较

沼气发酵系统是一个复杂的生态系统,其污泥微生物超过99%是不可培养的。为了优化沼气池纤维素的转化效率、沼气的产率和开展污泥微生物多样性研究,本研究采用化学裂解法、溶菌酶裂解法和QIAampDNA Stool Mini Kit提取了沼气池污泥样品中微生物的总DNA,对三种方法的DNA得率、纯度、大片段提取效果以及是否含有PCR反应抑制剂进行了研究,最后对16S rRNA基因V3区的扩增产物进行了PCR变性梯度凝胶电泳(PCR-DGGE)分析。与化学裂解法和QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit法相比,溶菌酶裂解法得到的DNA量大、片段长、片段分布广、PCR扩增效率高;同时PCR-DGGE图谱显示,溶菌酶裂解法可更好地展示沼气池污泥中微生物的多样性。该结果为进一步提高沼气池中纤维素的转化效率和沼气生产优势菌种的质和量打下了一定的前期基础。     

Variability in nuclear DNA among nonhuman primates: Application of molecular genetic techniques to intra- and inter-species genetic analyses

Nuclear DNA clones and sequence information derived from human genetic analyses were used to detect and characterize intra- and inter-species DNA variation at several nuclear loci in hominoids and cercopithecoids. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms were found at five loci among captive rhesus monkeys. Cross-species polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification detected an insertion within the beta-globin gene cluster in hylobatids. The combined use of cross-species PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis detected both species differences and intra-species polymorphism in the homeobox cluster 2 of hominoids. These results a) demonstrate that DNA clones and nucleotide sequence information from human molecular genetics can be used to facilitate studies of the molecular genetics of nonhuman primates, and b) document specific examples of intra- and inter-species molecular variability at several loci. © 1992 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

镇江香醋固态发酵醋醅中微生物总DNA提取方法比较

【目的】为了更加全面地分析我国传统固态发酵过程中微生物群落的多样性和演替情况,本文以镇江香醋固态发酵为例,对比研究了11种不同的总DNA提取法对醋醅中总DNA提取的影响。【方法】使用紫外分光光度计法和荧光定量PCR(Realtime Quantitative PCR)测定了不同提取方法得到的醋醅样品总DNA的产量与纯度,采用变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)法对固态发酵中细菌和真菌的多样性进行了分析。【结果】醋醅总DNA得率最高可达93.2±1.5μg/g干醅,细菌总数最高达到1.73×1013 copies.(g干醅)-1,真菌总数最高达到6.49×1012 copies.(g干醅)-1。不同的提取方法对DGGE结果有明显的影响,6种基于SDS裂解的方法所获得的条带较多。【结论】结果表明,液氮研磨+溶菌酶+SDS高盐抽提法(方法3)为最优的醋醅总DNA提取方法。     

Two-dimensional DNA typing

By two-dimensional (2D) DNA typing, multiple DNA fragments can be analyzed in parallel for all possible sequence variations. The method involves electrophoretic separation in polyacrylamide gels, first by size and subsequently on the basis of basepair sequence in a denaturing gradient. The system has been automated partly and a dedicated image analysis system for rapid interpretation of the often complex spot patterns was developed. In this review, the basic principles of 2D DNA typing, its methodology, and some major applications in genetic studies of animals, plants, and microorganisms will be discussed, with the emphasis on human genetics.     

贵州红壤水稻土淹水培养过程中Fe-氢酶微生物的多样性

【目的】研究水稻土淹水培养过程中Fe-氢酶微生物的多样性,对于揭示Fe-氢酶微生物的群落演替规律和产氢微生物的生化代谢机理具有重要的意义。【方法】采用PCR-变性梯度凝胶电泳和实时定量PCR技术进行基于梭菌属Fe-氢酶基因的多样性和丰度的分析。【结果】水稻土淹水培养过程中Fe-氢酶基因的变性梯度凝胶电泳图谱显示,培养1-5 d时Fe-氢酶基因条带数增加,10 d时Fe-氢酶基因条带数减少,20-40 d时Fe-氢酶基因条带数再次增加并保持稳定,对应的含Fe-氢酶微生物的群落结构随着培养过程的进行发生了显著变化。主成分分析表明,1 d与20 d、5 d与10 d、30 d与40 d的含Fe-氢酶微生物群落结构相似性较高,随着培养时间的增长含Fe-氢酶微生物群落结构趋于稳定。α多样性指数分析显示,1 d和10 d的丰富度指数(R)、Shannon-Weaver指数(H’)、Simpson指数(DS)与其他时间点相比较小,说明这2个时间点的Fe-氢酶多样性低,对应的含Fe-氢酶微生物群落结构较为简单,表明淹水培养过程中微生物的群落结构发生了演替变化。变性梯度凝胶电泳指纹图谱15个Fe-氢酶的优势条带测序后构建的系统发育树表明,培养前期的优势条带与梭菌属的Fe-氢酶关系较近,培养后期出现了非梭菌属的Fe-氢酶。淹水培养过程中Fe-氢酶基因的拷贝数在106/g干土的水平,占细菌的相对比例为1‰–2‰。【结论】水稻土淹水培养过程中发现了4种梭菌属Fe-氢酶和3种非梭菌属Fe-氢酶基因,对应的含Fe-氢酶微生物在培养前期群落结构发生显著演替变化,培养后期趋于稳定。     

A rapid,cost-effective procedure for the extraction of microbial DNA from soil

Here we describe a DNA extraction method that is based on a simple, rapid polyvinylpolypyrrolidone–calcium chloride precipitation to release microorganisms from the soil combined with lysozyme–proteinase–SDS lysis of the microbial community. The extracted DNA is of high quality and allows direct detection of specific genes by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as well as cloning of indigenous microbial DNA. This method facilitates the extraction of 36 500-mg soil samples simultaneously in a 2-h period by one person. The procedure is safe, inexpensive, and does not require specialized equipment or generate hazardous wastes.     

ARE POPULATIONS ISLANDS? ANALYSIS OF CHLOROPLAST DNA VARIATION IN AQUILEGIA

The degree to which conspecific populations are interconnected via ongoing gene flow remains an important focus of evolutionary biology. One major difficulty in distinguishing ongoing gene flow from historical subdivision is that either process can generate similar estimates of apparent gene flow. Thus, gene flow estimates themselves are insufficient to distinguish between these alternatives. However, genetic data coupled with additional information about demography and distribution do allow a distinction to be made. Here we address the specific question, does gene flow link populations of Aquilegia? In a survey of a 525 B.P. chloroplast DNA fragment sampled from 251 individual plants from 18 populations of three taxa, five haplotypes were identified. No significant relationship between geographic distance and apparent gene flow between population pairs existed. Further, the estimated level of gene flow was entirely compatible with a historical subdivision of Aquilegia populations during the late Pleistocene or early Holocene. Therefore, these patterns of variation are due not to ongoing gene flow, but rather to historical association among populations. Thus Aquilegia populations may be considered as distinct evolutionary entities with regard to seed-mediated processes. As a result, comparative analysis of ecological traits undergoing potentially rapid evolution (e.g., life histories, mating systems, inbreeding depression) should be possible in these taxa.     

变性梯度凝胶电泳法研究我国不同土壤氨氧化细菌群落组成及活性

实验选用了我国3种不同土壤研究土壤硝化活性、硝化细菌数量,并使用变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)的方法研究了不同土壤中氨氧化细菌(AOB)区系变化。通过28d的土壤培养实验研究发现,潮土具有最强的硝化势,几乎100%的铵态氮转化为硝态氮;而红壤中的硝化势最弱,只有4.9%的铵态氮转化为硝态氮。对这3种土壤硝化细菌进行计数发现,3种土壤氨氧化菌数量差异显著,而3种土壤亚硝酸氧化菌(NOB)处于一个数量级。采用氨氧化菌功能基因amoA(氨单加氧酶ammoniamonooxygenase)特异PCR结合DGGE的方法对土壤氨氧化菌区系进行分析。红壤有4个氨氧化菌种属,与潮土和黄泥土没有共同的氨氧化菌种属。4个种属中两个是与潮土和黄泥土亲源性比较远的,特有的氨氧化菌种属,这两个种属与已知的Nitrosospira属的cluster3bz97838和Nitrosospira属的cluster3aAF353263亲源性比较近。潮土有5个氨氧化菌种属,潮土与黄泥土有两个共同的氨氧化菌种属,这两个种属中的一个是潮土和黄泥土特有的,与其他氨氧化菌种属亲源性比较远的氨氧化菌种属,这个种属与已知的Nitrosospira属的cluster3bZ97849亲源性比较近。黄泥土有4个氨氧化菌种属,除了与潮土共有的一个种属是两种土壤特有的氨氧化菌种属外,黄泥土还有一个与其他氨氧化菌种属亲源性比较远的,黄泥土特有的种属,与Nitrosospira属的cluster3aAF353263亲源性很近。3种土壤中分离到的硝化细菌表现出不同的硝化能力。实验结果表明,以amoA基因为目标的PCR-DGGE是比以16SrDNA为目标的PCR-DGGE更有效的研究氨氧化菌种群的方法;3种土壤的氨氧化菌种群差异显著,尤其是红壤的氨氧化菌种群与另外两种土壤差异明显,这种差异可能与红壤的低pH条件对氨氧化菌种群的长期选择有关;3种土壤中的硝化活性与土壤中的硝化细菌数量没有显著相关,可能由于3种土壤差异显著的土壤环境对硝化活性的影响造成。因此在对不同土壤硝化细菌进行研究时不仅需要对硝化细菌数量进行研究,还需要研究不同土壤中硝化细菌的种属及不同土壤环境条件对硝化细菌硝化活性的影响。