Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates

One of the most important yardsticks for evaluating sampling for the detection of premalignant and malignant cervical lesions is the percentage of smears that contain cells from the transformation zone. Until February 1985, all smears made by around 500 different general practitioners were taken with a modified Ayre spatula. In the period February to October 1985, 24,496 smears of spatula samples and 5,716 smears prepared by combined spatula-Cytobrush sampling were analyzed. With the introduction of the combined spatula-Cytobrush method, the rate of smears containing cells from the transformation zone (adequate smears) rose from 84% to 98%. With the spatula-alone method, there were large differences between the rates of adequate smears from the various doctors; with the combined spatula-Cytobrush method, all participating doctors were without exception highly successful. The positive cytology rate was significantly higher in the combined spatula-Cytobrush smears (0.75%) as compared with the spatula-alone smears (0.38%). There was also a change in the diagnostic pattern in that more premalignant changes of the glandular epithelium of the endocervix were detected. One case of early invasive adenocarcinoma of the endocervix, in which the combined spatula-Cytobrush smears was positive and the repeat spatula-alone smear made by the gynecologist was negative, is discussed in detail. We anticipate that, with the large-scale introduction of the Cytobrush sampling method, fewer repeat smears will be required and, in addition, the observed relative increase of endocervical adenocarcinoma of the endocervix will be halted. In addition, there will be fewer false-negative smears.     

Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears

The cytologically positive cases found in 25,300 cervical smears of spatula samples and 6,168 smears prepared by combined spatula-Cytobrush sampling were analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy (the correlation between the cytologic and histologic diagnoses) was the same for both types of sampling. As to the histologic diagnosis, the rates of severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and squamous carcinoma in the spatula-Cytobrush group were more than twice as high as in the spatula group. In the spatula group, the majority of abnormal cells was of the mature type. In the spatula-Cytobrush group, the majority of smears contained a mixture of immature and mature abnormal cells. The more immature lesions, which are often located higher in the endocervical canal, seem to be better sampled by the Cytobrush. The results indicate that the Cytobrush reaches areas that a spatula cannot reach, resulting in a higher diagnostic efficiency.     

Collection devices for cervicovaginal cytology: a comparison

OBJECTIVE: To compare cervicovaginal smears obtained by a cotton-tipped swab with those obtained by cervix brush and modified Ayre spatula. STUDY DESIGN: A combined cervicovaginal smear was collected from 100 women using 3 different collection devices: cotton-tipped swab, cervix brush, and modified Ayre spatula. In each patient a set of 3 smears was collected by the same cytotechnologist using all 3 devices in random order. Smears were evaluated using parameters mandatory for an optimal smear: evenly dispersed, well-preserved, adequate cells from the transformation zone. The cost and availability of the collection devices were also considered. RESULTS: The swab was the most effective device in obtaining thin, evenly spread, adequate, well-preserved smears as against the cervix brush and Ayre spatula. The pickup of abnormal cells was similar with the cotton-tipped swab and cervix brush, while the Ayre spatula failed to yield high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance and adenocarcinoma cells. The cotton-tipped swab proved to be the most cost effective. CONCLUSION: A properly prepared cotton-tipped swab is an inexpensive, readily available, nontraumatic collection device that yields smear of optimal quality.     

Exploiting the "toothpick effect" of the Cytobrush by plastic embedding of cervical samples

The introduction of the combined spatula-Cytobrush sampling method has increased the diagnostic accuracy of cervical cytology. However, the smears from a small number of cases contained epithelial fragments dislodged by the "toothpick effect" of the Cytobrush. Due to their thickness, these epithelial fragments in the smears are very difficult (if not impossible) to scrutinize and are thus undiagnosable. The presence of only such fragments in smears led to false-negative diagnoses in two cases of invasive carcinoma. To solve this problem, these epithelial fragments were embedded in plastic, with thin sections prepared from the blocks. This paper presents the morphologic features and diagnostic accuracy of 77 such problem cases (found among 50,000 cases with spatula-Cytobrush smears) to which this method was applied. In almost all cases, the diagnosis on the plastic-embedded sections matched the diagnosis on the colposcopically directed biopsy. Of these 77 patients, the biopsy diagnosis showed 5 severe dysplasias, 6 carcinomas in situ, 1 squamous-cell carcinoma, 2 adenocarcinomas in situ and 2 adenocarcinomas. In addition, data are presented concerning the nuclear-size and shape-factor differences in smears versus plastic-embedded sections, and the stereologic consequences of smearing and cutting these epithelial fragments are discussed. These plastic-embedded sections are well suited for use in quantitative microscopy, as well as for diagnostic purposes.     

Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer

The cytologic histories of 376 women presenting with invasive carcinoma of the cervix were analyzed. In total, 202 (53.7%) of these women had had 355 smears taken during the three years preceding presentation. All 320 smears with an original cytologic diagnosis of less than cancer were reviewed. The original cytologic diagnosis was low in 95 (30.6%) of 310 adequate smears. Originally, 96 (30.9%) of the adequate smears were evaluated as negative; at review, only 55 (17.5%) of the adequate smears were evaluated as negative. Comparing the review diagnoses to the 355 total smears, the rates of negative smears were 13.5% (42 of 310) for squamous-cell carcinoma, 30.0% (12 of 40) for adenocarcinoma and 20.0% (1 of 5) for adenosquamous carcinoma (P less than .05). The cellular composition of the smear was significantly related to the cytologic detection of abnormalities: endocervical cylindrical and/or metaplastic cells were seen in only 45.5% of smears diagnosed as negative, but in 84.4% and 97.8% of smears diagnosed as atypia and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, respectively P less than .00001). Smears without endocervical cells should be considered inadequate and should be repeated.     

Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears

The quality of the cervical smear, a decisive factor in the efficacy of population screening, can depend on the sampling method utilized. An analysis was made of the performance of five sample takers in a screening program, each of whom had made approximately 5,000 smears, and of the five sampling methods each had used: spatula alone (method A), Cytobrush plus spatula (method B), Cytopick (method C), cotton swab plus spatula (method D) and Cervex brush (method E). The differences between the sample takers and the sampling methods were significant in both the detection of grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN III) (P less than .01) and in the production of smears containing endocervical cells (EC+) (P less than .018). The data obtained firmly establish the importance of the presence of endocervical cells for smear adequacy. The results of this study indicate that (1) method B (Cytobrush plus spatula) and method C (Cytopick) give superior results in the preparation of EC+ smears and in the detection of CIN III and thus should be used in population screening programs, and (2) methods A and D should not be used for cervical cytologic sampling in such programs.     

Cytological diagnosis of endometritis in the mare: investigations of sampling techniques and relation to bacteriological results

Aim of this study was to compare uterine smears made using the Knudsen catheter, the cytology brush and a uterine culture swab with regard to diagnostic usefulness and the occurrence of neutrophils. Additionally correlation between culture results and the occurrence of neutrophils in uterine smears was investigated. Samples were collected from 340 mares, 81.5% of which were in estrus. Smears made using the cytology brush yielded more endometrial cells per high-power field than those made using the other two instruments (p<0.0001), and a larger proportion had PMNs compared with smears made using the uterine swab (p<0.0001). For smears made with the cytology brush, cultures of β-hemolytic streptococci were more often (p=0.002) accompanied by PMNs than cultures of bacteria other than β-hemolytic streptococci, and there was a positive correlation (r(s)=0.2 p=0.01) between the number of PMNs in smears and the number of colonies of β-hemolytic streptococci. The cytology brush was superior to the other methods because it generated a larger proportion of diagnostic useful smears and the occurrence of PMNs in smears was significantly correlated with the occurrence of cultures of β-hemolytic streptococci.     

Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling

A comparison between nonspatula (cotton swab and Cytobrush) cervical sampling methods and spatula (wooden Ayre spatula and plastic extended-tip Szalay Cyto-Spatula) sampling methods was made in 109 cases. Based on the presence of endocervical cells, there were statistically significant qualitative differences between the non-spatula methods as well as between the spatula methods, but not between the Cytobrush and Cyto-Spatula smears or the cotton swab and Ayre spatula smears. In all kinds of inflammatory lesions, the spatula samples were more accurate and diagnostic than the nonspatula ones. In all cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and in most cases of squamous metaplasia, the Cyto-Spatula sample was the most accurate. It is concluded that the Szalay Cyto-Spatula method is superior to the other cervical sampling methods because it provides well-preserved cells from both the endocervix and the ectocervix in one smear. The Cytobrush should be used in conjunction with spatula sampling (combination method) for effective sampling of the cervix. The Cytobrush alone is effective mainly for endocervical sampling while the Ayre spatula alone is effective mainly for ectocervical sampling; the cotton swab is ineffective for both endocervical and ectocervical sampling.     

The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears

In 30 patients whose last cervical smear had lacked endocervical cells, two new samples were collected, one with a cotton-tipped applicator and the other with the recently developed Cytobrush cervical brush. With the cotton swab, no endocervical cells were present in the repeat smears of 21 patients, as compared with only 3 Cytobrush smears lacking endocervical cells; the difference is statistically significant (P less than .001). Quantitatively, the cellular yield with the Cytobrush was larger. It is concluded that the use of the cervical brush to collect material for cervical smears is more effective and provides a higher yield of cells than the use of the conventional cotton swab. The importance of the presence of endocervical cells in a smear as evidence that the transformation zone has been properly sampled is also discussed.     

Comparison of the cytobrush, cottonswab, and low-volume uterine flush techniques to evaluate endometrial cytology for diagnosing endometritis in chronically infertile mares

Endometritis is the most important cause of infertility in barren mares. The quick method of endometrial cytology (EC) has a relatively high reliability in diagnosing endometrial inflammation in the mare. For reliable cytological results, a collection technique that yields many well-preserved cells representative of a large uterine surface area without causing harm to the reproductive tract is required. The aim of the study was to compare three usually employed techniques for collection of endometrial and inflammatory cells (guarded cotton swab, uterine lavage, and cytobrush) in chronically infertile mares. Twenty Standardbred mares were used. In each mare, samples for EC were collected, first by a cotton swab (DGS), then by a cytobrush (CB), and finally by low volume flush (LVF). The slides were stained using the Diff Quick stain. The following parameters were assessed for each tested technique: background content of the slides; quality of the cells harvested; total cellularity; neutrophils; ratio PMN/uterine epithelial cells; inflammatory cells; vaginal epithelium cells. Categorical variables were compared using contingency tables and Pearson Chi-square tests, whereas continuous variables were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); P < 0.05 was considered significant. Samplings by DGS and CB resulted easy and quick to perform via a single operator in all cases. LVF was performed easily, but required the presence of 2-3 players and took more time. The background content of the slides prepared by DGS appeared proteinaceous, slides prepared by LVF appeared contaminated by red blood cells or debris, whereas slides prepared by CB appeared clear. All smears showed a good total cellularity. The CB yielded significantly more cells (P < 0.0001) than DGS and LVF. The DGS produced significant more cells than LVF (P < 0.0001). The DGS produced significantly more (P = 0.003) intact cells than CB and LVF. Distorted cells were significantly (P = 0.001) more frequent in smears by LVF. The CB harvested significantly (P = 0.009) more fragmented cells. CB and LVF produced significantly (P < 0.0001; P = 0.02) more PMNs/HPF than DGS. In smears collected by LVF the proportion of PMNs/uterine epithelial cells was significantly (P = 0.0062; P = 0.0023) higher than in smears by CB and DGS. CB collected a significantly higher (P = 0.0011) proportion of PMNs than DGS. Acute endometritis was diagnosed in 50% (10/20) of the mares by DGS cytological samples, 25% (5/20) by CB, and 75% (15/20) by LVF. Inflammatory cells other than PMN (lymphocytes, macrophages, eosinophils) were collected exclusively by CB method. Epithelial cells from the vagina were only detected in LVF slides. The agreement of the diagnosis of endometritis between the three techniques of collection and between the different criteria adopted to evaluate smears obtained with the same technique was poor (k ≤ 0.3). In conclusion, results show that cytobrush and flush specimens were superior in all parameters to cotton swab smears. Even though the cytobrush technique requires specialized equipment, sample collection by this method was easier, more consistent, and quicker than the lavage method, indicating that the brush would be the preferred collection method for use on field in the mare. More studies are needed to establish criteria for interpretation of inflammation in the mare on cytobrush samples.     

Mast cells in the aspiration cytology differential diagnosis of adenolymphoma

Review was undertaken of 20 cases of adenolymphoma (Warthin's tumor) of the salivary glands diagnosed by fine needle aspiration (FNA). Smears of the aspirates from 16 of the 20 cases (80%) contained mast cells associated with monolayered sheets of oncocytes. Aspiration smears from control cases showed cells in significantly fewer instances: 10% of the cases of mucoepidermoid carcinoma, 5% of the cases of pleomorphic adenoma and none of the cases of acinic-cell tumor, squamous-cell carcinoma and branchial cysts. Mast cells in association with oncocytes thus should be considered supportive evidence of an FNA diagnosis of adenolymphoma.     

The presence of endometrial cells in cervical smears in relation to the day of the menstrual cycle and the method of contraception

The presence of endometrial cells in cervical smears was studied in a large series of women participating in a population screening program for cervical cancer, in relation to different time periods of the menstrual cycle and to the method of contraception practiced. In the total group of women studied, endometrial cells were present in an average of 12% of the cervical smears. In women who were menstruating cyclically, the percentage of cervical smears containing endometrial cells was not age dependent. Only in women over 52 years was a lower number of endometrium-positive cervical smears found: in postmenopausal women, 0.6% of smears were found to contain endometrial cells. In menstruating women, the frequency of endometrial cells in cervical smears was highest during the menses. After day four, through the proliferative phase, the percentages of cervical smears containing endometrial cells markedly decreased. During the secretory phase, an average of 2% of the smears contained endometrial cells; in the premenstrual phase (after day 25), the percentages of endometrial cell-positive smears rose again. When related to the method of contraception practiced, significant differences in the percentages of cervical smears with endometrial cells appeared. In women using oral hormonal contraceptives, the average numbers of smears containing endometrial cells for the whole cycle as well as for each period of the cycle were significantly lower. This phenomenon might be due to endometrial atrophy on the basis of prolonged use of oral hormonal contraceptives. In women wearing an intrauterine device, at any moment the frequencies of smears with endometrial cells present were significantly higher than the values found in women using any other method of contraception or not using contraceptives. The evaluation of cells originating from the endometrium requires considerable experience. The identification of endometrial cells can be made with greater confidence when the cytologist is aware of the exact date of the menstrual cycle and of the impact on the presence of endometrial cells in cervical smears caused by different methods of contraception.     

Computer-assisted primary screening of cervical smears using the PAPNET method: comparison with conventional screening and evaluation of the role of the cytologist

The PAPNET method is an interactive computer-assisted screening procedure. the diagnostician selects the abnormal video tiles out of the 128 and decides which smears need additional light microscopy. the original diagnoses of 1494 archival smears were compared with the PAPNET analysis of the same smears. the general trend observed was that the PAPNET-assisted diagnoses were of a higher grade than those assigned by the primary screener, thus less cases were signed out as negative. In addition, the PAPNET method was used for primary screening of 2971 randomly selected smears, whilst in the same period 5797 smears were conventionally screened. Using the PAPNET method, significantly fewer smears were signed out as negative. Seventy-three percent of the cases were diagnosed on the basis of the information provided by the 128 video tiles, 11% had to be screened completely by the light microscope, and the remaining cases needed additional light microscopy of a part of the smear. As a result, PAPNET-assisted screening was approximately two times faster. the great advantage of the method is that it is much less tiring for the eyes than conventional screening, making fatigue-related errors less likely, and if a smear contains only a few abnormal cells, these are easier to find.     

Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate?

The retrieval of columnar endocervical cells from the squamocolumnar junction has generally been considered to be a measure of the adequacy of a Papanicolaou smear; this implies that, if endocervical cells are absent from the smear, the examination for cervical cancer is less than optimal and should be repeated. A study was undertaken to determine if women with serial Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells showed an increased rate of development of cervical atypia in subsequent smears. The smears of 18,914 women were evaluated for the presence or absence of endocervical cells and for the subsequent development of an abnormal smear over a four-year study period. No differences were found in the rates of atypia between women with and those without endocervical cells on serial Papanicolaou smears. Women with prior Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells were much more likely to have a subsequent Papanicolaou smear without endocervical cells. Although no difference was found in the incidence of cervical atypia in the two groups during this short study period, these results should be considered to be preliminary.     

Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy

The presence of endocervical cells in routine gynecologic smears (prepared from spatula and cotton swab samples) and Cytobrush smears was analyzed in 52 patients with a history of prior cryotherapy. These cases represented 11% of the 491 women evaluated using both techniques between August 1, 1987, and January 31, 1990. The routine smear contained endocervical cells in 25 (48%) of the 52 cases while the Cytobrush smear contained endocervical cells in 49 (94%) of the cases. The use of the Cytobrush for cervical cytologic screening thus appears to be of value in patients with a prior history of cryotherapy, which frequently renders the transformation zone less accessible to routine sampling.     

Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Ayre wooden spatula, the cotton-tipped swab and the Zelsmyr Cytobrush in obtaining endocervical cells. DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparison study. SETTING: Family practice unit. PATIENTS: All postpubertal, nonpregnant women who underwent a routine Papanicolaou smear during a 7-month period. INTERVENTIONS: The three devices were used in each patient in a randomized sequence. An experienced cytotechnologist blinded to the device used evaluated the slides for overall epithelial cellularity (graded from 0 [acellular specimen] to 12 [overloaded sample]), density (the number of groups of five or more endocervical cells) and size of cell clusters (5 to 10 cells per cluster [score of 1], 11 to 100 [2] or more than 100 [3]). MAIN RESULTS: Samples from 2 of the 136 women were rejected because of improper labelling of the slides or failure to use all three devices. Seventy-six (57%) of the smears obtained with the spatula and 71 (53%) with the swab had no endocervical cells, as compared with only 14 (10%) obtained with the Cytobrush (p = 0.001). The overall cellularity (and standard deviation [SD]) of the smears obtained with the Cytobrush (5.69 [SD 1.17], p = 0.001) and the spatula (5.70 [SD 1.46], p = 0.001) was significantly greater than the cellularity of those obtained with the swab (4.31 [SD 1.17]). The Cytobrush yielded significantly more groups of endocervical cells (109.84 per slide) than either the spatula (4.17) or the swab (6.25) (p = 0.001). The Cytobrush also produced larger cell clusters (1.56 [SD 0.67], p = 0.001) than either the swab (0.83 [SD 1.70]) or the spatula (0.64 [SD 0.67]). CONCLUSIONS: The Cytobrush and the spatula should be used instead of the spatula alone or the spatula and the swab for collecting endocervical cells.     

Cellular composition of cervical smears in relation to the day of the menstrual cycle and the method of contraception

The influence of the day of the menstrual cycle and the method of contraception on the cellular composition of cervical smears was investigated. The percentage of unsatisfactory smears during the first four days of the cycle was understandably very high, leaving only 80% of the smears of sufficient quality for cytologic diagnosis. The percentage of smears of insufficient quality during the remainder of the cycle was significantly higher in women using oral hormonal contraceptives. The percentages of smears containing endocervical columnar cells, a criterion for judging smears to be of high quality, differed significantly among women using different modes of contraception. The highest percentage of smears without endocervical columnar cells was found in women using oral contraceptives; during the first half of the cycle in these women, smears were of higher quality than during the second half of the cycle. In women not practicing contraception or using nonhormonal methods of contraception, the differences in cellular composition during the cycle, though significant, were too small to be of practical importance. Women using oral contraceptives thus have an increased risk for a potential false-negative diagnosis because of the higher percentage of smears of unreliable quality taken in these women. In women using oral hormonal contraceptives, smears should be taken during the first half of the cycle because of the higher percentage of smears of high quality in that period.     

Differences between papanicolaou smears with correct and incorrect diagnoses

A case control study of women with carcinoma in situ (CINIII) was undertaken comparing Papanicolaou smears for which false negative reports had been issued with slides for which true positive reports had been made. the number of abnormal cells was the strongest differentiating factor. Where there were less than 50 abnormal cells on the slide, the odds of a false negative report being issued was 23.7 times greater (95% confidence interval 3.7-150) than when there were 200 or more abnormal cells. In false negative slides, the abnormal cells were likely to be not represented throughout the slide, present only as single cells rather than as groups, small in size and with finely granular normochromatic nuclei. We conclude that there are intrinsic differences between true positive and false negative slides. Given these characteristics, rapid rescreening of slides that are considered negative may not be an effective method of reducing the false negative rate.     

The Irrigation Smear—A New Cytodiagnostic Technique for the Detection of Cancer of the Uterine Cervix

Using the Davis cytopipette, cytologic smears were prepared from 2014 patients; 1367 of these specimens were obtained by the patients themselves. The series included 57 cases of carcinoma or atypia of the cervix, and 50 (88%) of these cases were found to have abnormal cells in the irrigation smear.Cytopipette samples were obtained by a nurse from 647 Eskimos, but cell preservation in this group was not satisfactory because of a delay of several weeks in preparing the smears. Accurate results depend also on specific training of the personnel reading the smears because fewer cells may be present in these smears than in cervical scrape smears.The irrigation smear is recommended as a reasonably accurate method of screening women for cancer of the cervix if they are not being examined regularly by the cervical scrape method. Hospital admissions of females may be a fruitful source of such cases.     

Immunocytochemistry of cerebrospinal fluid

In order to determine how best to study cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by immunocytochemical techniques, several crucial technical variables and five immunocytochemical methods were examined. Immunocytochemical studies could be performed on either cell suspensions or smears. The method using cell suspensions was more sensitive, producing less background staining, but requiring more cells than that using smears. Among the five methods examined, indirect immunoperoxidase (IP) and indirect immunoalkaline phosphatase (IAP) were comparable in sensitivity. The peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP), alkaline phosphatase-antialkaline phosphatase (APAAP) and avidin-biotin complex-immunoalkaline phosphatase (ABC-AP) methods were comparable in sensitivity and were more sensitive than either the IP or IAP technique. The peroxidase methods were plagued with problems related to endogenous enzyme activity and the ABC-AP method may exhibit undesirable background staining. Therefore, the IAP method should be used for cell suspensions and the APAAP for cells on smears. In CSF specimens with a small number of cells, immunocytochemical studies should be done on smears by the APAAP method. These conclusions are supported by our experience with CSF specimens from patients with reactive and neoplastic lymphocytoses.