Long-Term GH therapy: epidemiology and auxologic outcome

OBJECTIVES: Epidemiologic and auxologic characteristics of patients treated with GH during childhood and adolescence and entered in a national registry in Catalonia were studied between 1988 and 1997. At the end of 1997, prevalence was 53.2 treatments/100,000 inhabitants aged 0-14 years. Maximum annual incidence rates were observed in 1990 and 1991 (34.0-35.6 cases/100,000 inhabitants aged 0-14 years). STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of treatments terminated in 1993 (n = 548) revealed, for the three principal reasons for cessation of treatment ('near-final height', 'adequate height but further growth potential', and 'poor growth response'), that males began and ended treatment at older ages with a better auxologic situation in SDS than girls at the beginning and end of therapy in the first two subgroups, with a similar duration of therapy. Severe GH deficiency (GHD) [both multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD) and the most severe isolated GHD (IGHD-A)] was more frequent in the group ending treatment at 'near-final height', whereas cessation of therapy because of 'poor growth response' was more frequent in the group with 'other causes of short stature' and no demonstrable GHD by routine tests. In the near-final height group, after excluding Turner's syndrome, MPHD and GHD cases secondary to brain tumors and GH deficiencies associated with malformative syndromes, positive linear correlations were observed between HSDS at the end of treatment and HSDS at the beginning, predicted adult height SDS (PAHSDS) and target height SDS (THSDS). Multiple regression analysis showed that in this group of patients, 41.4% of the variability in HSDS increment can be explained by the equation: HSDS increment = -0.33 + 0.29 THSDS - 0.68 HSDS at the beginning of treatment. RESULTS: The outcome showed a reasonable use of GH, since good-response cases generally continued treatment until final height whereas therapy was suspended in doubtful cases.     

Differences in serum GH cut-off values for pharmacological tests of GH secretion depend on the serum GH method. Clinical validation from the growth velocity score during the first year of treatment

BACKGROUND: The serum GH cut-off value for pharmacological tests of GH secretion (PhT GH) depends on the type of test and also on the method used for determining serum GH. Cut-off serum GH values as different as 5-10 ng/ml, have been reported, and have been validated biochemically. We have used the growth velocity (GV)-standard deviation score (SDS) during the first year of treatment with rhGH to validate these cut-offs on a biological basis. METHODS: Fifty pre-pubertal patients with short stature (height < or =-2 SDS and GV < or =-1.2 SDS) were studied. GH deficiency (GHD) was diagnosed in 39 patients, on the basis of clinical and auxological parameters and on the serum concentration of IGF-1, and non-GHD in the other 11 patients. Two PhT GH (arginine and clonidine) were carried out in the 50 patients. Serum GH was determined by two different methods: one detecting most of serum GH isoforms, named Total GH (HGH Bio-Tech, MAIA Clone), and another one, only detecting the 22 kDa GH, named 22K GH (GH-22K IFMA, Wallac). RESULTS: Basal data: all patients with GHD and with non-GHD had maximal serum GH response (MaxR) values below and above the cut-off, respectively, for the serum Total GH and 22K GH. The mean 22K GH/Total GH ratio was similar to previous publications. Post-rhGH treatment data: the two groups improved their height SDS during the first year of treatment, particularly patients with GHD. A receiver-operator curve was used to define the best threshold for post-treatment GV-SDS that separates GHD from non-GHD patients. This value was 1.91 GV-SDS. A negative correlation between first year treatment GV-SDS and pre-treatment serum GH MaxR was found for the two assays (p < 0.001). Then, the best cut-off GV-SDS, previously calculated with the receiver-operator curve (1.91 SDS) was used to interpolate the corresponding serum GH values, as determined by the two methods. For Total GH, the value was 10.8 ng/ml, and for 22K GH, it was 5.4 ng/ml. CONCLUSION: The cut-off values calculated by biological means to separate GHD from non-GHD were remarkably similar to those calculated biochemically (10.0 and 4.8 ng/ml, respectively) for Total and 22K GH. This is a biological validation for using different cut-off values, appropriate for each assay, to diagnose GHD.     

Response to long-term growth hormone therapy in short children with reduced GH bioactivity

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether short children with normal growth hormone (GH) immunoreactivity, but reduced bioactivity (bioinactive GH) could benefit from rhGH treatment as GH deficient (GHD) patients. Methods: We evaluated 12 pre-pubertal children (8 M, 4 F), with GH deficiency-like phenotype showing normal serum GH peak levels (>10 ng/ml), measured by immunofluorimetric assay (IFMA-GH), in contrast with a reduced GH bioactivity (bio-GH), evaluated using the Nb(2) cells. We also evaluated 15 age-matched GHD pre-pubertal children (11 M, 4 F) with serum GH peak <5 ng/ml. Both groups were treated with rhGH therapy at the dose of 0.23 mg/kg/week s.c. RESULTS: Serum bio-GH/IFMA-GH ratio at peak time for each patient during the provocative test was significantly lower in bioinactive GH than in GHD children (0.29 vs. 2.05, p = 0.00001). Recombinant human GH therapy induced a significant (p < 0.001) increase in growth rate in both groups during the first 2 years. In the third year of treatment, while growth rate in GHD children is maintained, in bioinactive GH patients it decreases remaining, however higher compared to the pre-treatment one. CONCLUSIONS: Short rhGH therapy given to selected bioinactive GH children improve growth rate and might result in greater final adult height.     

IGF-I and IGF binding protein-3 levels during initial GH dosage step-up are indicators of GH sensitivity in GH-deficient children and short children born small for gestational age

BACKGROUND: A stepwise increment of the GH dose is an approach aimed at avoiding adverse events. We investigated GH sensitivity by studying IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations during the initial phase of GH treatment. METHODS: Our investigation was part of the regular follow-up of prepubertal children with GH deficiency (GHD) (n = 31) and small for gestational age (SGA) (n = 23). Dosage was increased in three steps: one-third at the start, two-thirds after 14 days, and the full dose after 28 days (full dose: GHD = 28 microg/kg body weight (BW)/day; SGA = 60 microg/kg BW/day). Blood samples were taken on days 0, 14 and 28, as well as in conjunction with anthropometrical examinations after 3, 6 and 12 months. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were measured by means of published in-house RIAs and age-related references were used to calculate standard deviation scores (SDS). Height velocity (cm/year) and Delta HT SDS were taken as growth response parameters. RESULTS: Before GH treatment (GHD vs. SGA; median and p values): age (years) (6.6 vs. 6.0; n.s.), HT SDS (-2.6 vs. -3.2; p < 0.05); GH amount after stepping up (mug/kg BW/day) (28 vs. 60; p < 0.01); BW SDS (-0.5 vs. -2.9; p < 0.01); max. GH stimulated (microg/l) (5.6 vs. 10.8; p < 0.01); IGF-I SDS (-3.5 vs. -1.8; p < 0.01); IGFBP-3 SDS (-2.0 vs. 0.8; p < 0.01). After 1 year of GH therapy: HT velocity (cm/year) (9.8 vs. 9.6; n.s.), Delta HT SDS (0.9 vs. 0.9; n.s.); WT velocity (kg/year) (3.3 vs. 3.5; n.s.). Our results show that changes in growth similar to GHD could be induced in SGA by a dosage that was twice as high as the replacement dose given in GHD. GH dose and HT velocity did not correlate in both groups. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 increased as follows in GHD and SGA during stepping up of the dosage (ng/ml, GHD vs. SGA): at start, 54 vs. 89; at day 14, 78 vs. 132; at day 28, 90 vs. 167; at 3 months, 118 vs. 218. There was the same relationship between dose levels and absolute IGF-I concentrations in both groups. In terms of IGF-I SDS, the dose-response curve in SGA showed a shift to the right in comparison to GHD, thus indicating lower sensitivity to GH. The dynamics of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 differed, as IGFBP-3 peaked earlier (on day 28). In GHD, IGF-I SDS at 3 months was -0.7 vs. +0.9 in SGA. Near-identical levels were found for Delta IGF-I SDS and IGFBP-3 SDS above basal levels for each time-point investigated. First year HT velocity in GHD correlated negatively with basal IGF-I SDS (R(2) = 0.33; p <0.001) and basal IGFBP-3 (R(2) = 0.17; p <0.05) but did not correlate with the IGF-I increment during the 0- to 3-month period. Conversely, first year HT velocity correlated (+) in SGA with the IGF SDS increment during the 0- to 3-month period (R(2) = 0.26; p = <0.05). Height velocity in SGA, however, correlated neither with basal IGF-I and IGFBP-3 nor with the 0- to 3-month increments of IGFBP-3 SDS. CONCLUSIONS: IGFs increase during initial GH therapy, thus raising questions about short-term IGF generation tests. (I) In terms of IGF generation, substantially lower sensitivity to GH was observable in SGA. (II) Higher GH sensitivity during first year catch-up growth is associated with GHD, but in SGA it is attributable to increases in IGF. A wider range of GH dosages needs to be explored in order to gain further insight into the relationship between GH dose, IGF levels, and growth. Monitoring IGFs is a practical means for exploring GH sensitivity during dosage stepping up.     

Hyperghrelinemia is a common feature of Prader-Willi syndrome and pituitary stalk interruption: a pathophysiological hypothesis

BACKGROUND: Elevated plasma ghrelin levels have recently been reported in adults and children with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). The aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between obesity, growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) and ghrelinemia in PWS and to examine whether hyperghrelinemia is specific to PWS. METHODS: We measured fasting ghrelinemia in children with PWS, idiopathic GHD (iGHD), obese children, controls and in 6 children presenting another congenital syndrome associated with GHD: pituitary stalk interruption (PSI). RESULTS: Children with PWS exhibited significantly higher ghrelin levels (995 pg/ml (801/1,099, median 1st/3rd quartile)) than iGHD (517 pg/ml (392/775)), obese (396 pg/ml (145/610)) and control (605 ng/ml (413/753)) children. Similar to PWS hyperghrelinemia was found in PSI children (1,029 pg/ml (705/1,151)), and was not modified by GH treatment. CONCLUSION: We conclude that hyperghrelinemia in PWS and PSI is not related to GH secretion. We hypothesize that a major site of ghrelin action is at the hypothalamic level and that a 'ghrelin resistance' syndrome may be present in these patients, primarily due to a hypothalamic defect. Combined alterations such as impaired serotonin receptor regulation associated with abnormal ghrelin responsiveness are probably responsible for obesity in PWS.     

Bone age progression during the first year of growth hormone therapy in pre-pubertal children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency, Turner syndrome or idiopathic short stature, and in short children born small for gestational age: analysis of data from KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database)

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The beneficial effects of growth hormone (GH) therapy on statural growth in children are well established, but the effects on skeletal maturation are less clear. The progression of bone age (BA) was therefore studied during the first year of GH treatment in pre-pubertal children with idiopathic GH deficiency (GHD), Turner syndrome (TS) or idiopathic short stature (ISS), and in short pre-pubertal children born small for gestational age (SGA). METHODS: Cross-sectional data on 2,209 short children with idiopathic GHD, 694 with TS, 569 with ISS and 153 with SGA were analysed. Longitudinal data were also analysed from 308 children with idiopathic GHD, 99 with TS, 57 with ISS and 29 with SGA. All patients included in the study were enrolled in KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database) and were being treated with recombinant human GH (Genotropin). BA was assessed using the Greulich and Pyle method at baseline and after 1 year of GH therapy. RESULTS: In all groups of patients the mean progression of BA was 1 year during the year of GH therapy, although there was considerable individual variation. Progression of BA was not correlated with chronological age, BA, height SD score (SDS) or body mass index SDS at the onset of GH therapy. There was also no consistent effect of the GH dose on BA progression. CONCLUSION: Progression of BA appears to be normal in patients receiving GH in these diagnostic groups, at least over the first year of treatment in pre-puberty.     

Long-term evolution of endocrine disorders and effect of GH therapy in 35 patients with pituitary stalk interruption syndrome

We report long-term evolution of endocrine functions and the results of GH treatment in 35 patients (26 male and 9 female) with pituitary stalk interruption. At diagnosis, mean chronological age was 4.8 +/- 2.7 years, mean SDS for height -3.1 +/- 0.8 with a bone age retardation of 2.3 +/- 1.3 years and a mean SDS for growth velocity of -0.5 +/- 1.1; 80% presented complete GH deficiency (GHD) and 20% partial GHD; thyroid deficiency was present in 47.1% of children with complete GHD but absent in all partial GHD. Diagnosis was made during the first months of life in only 2 patients while 23% presented with severe neonatal distress; neonatal signs were only observed in the group with pituitary height below 2 mm (45.7% of patients). GHD was isolated in 40.6% of patients below 10 years while multiple hormone deficiencies was consistent at completion of growth in all patients. Height gain was significantly higher in patients who started GH treatment before 4 years (p = 0.002). GH treatment is very effective: in 13 patients, final height was -0.4 +/- 1.0, total height gain 3.2 +/- 1.2 and distance to target height -0.3 +/- 1.6 SDS.     

Growth response to recombinant human growth hormone (GH) in children with idiopathic growth retardation by level of maximum GH peak during GH stimulation tests

Due to their lack of reproducibility, it is unlikely that GH stimulation tests can provide reliable diagnostic information to distinguish partial isolated GH deficiency (GHD) from idiopathic short stature (ISS). We hypothesized that the classical distinction between these groups, essentially based on stimulatory GH peaks, is artificial and that, as a consequence, the average response to GH treatment will not be different between them. The hypothesized lack of prognostic validity of stimulatory GH peaks was studied in 435 prepubertal children with nonorganic growth retardation. Children were categorized as 'severe GHD', 'partial GHD' or 'ISS', if the maximum rise in their serum GH during two GH stimulation tests was 0--10 mU/l, 10--20 mU/l, or >20 mU/l, respectively. Children with 'partial GHD' had short-term (1- and 2-year) and long-term (till final adult height) growth responses similar to those of children with ISS, significantly lower than the response seen in children with 'severe GHD'. In children with stimulatory GH peaks >10 mU/l, including those currently considered partially GH deficient, the maximum GH peak was not a significant determinant of growth response in the short or the long term. In conclusion, 'partial GHD' is ill defined and cannot be distinguished from ISS based on the currently applied auxological or GH stimulation test criteria alone. More research is required for better identification of (all) children who will respond to GH treatment, whether or not GH deficient.     

Relevance of IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGFBP-2 measurements during GH treatment of GH-deficient and non-GH-deficient children and adolescents

BACKGROUND: Little information is available on the relevance of parameters representing the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system with regard to growth hormone (GH) treatment during childhood. In adults, high IGF-I levels were found to be associated with side effects and long-term risks. AIM/METHOD: Our aim was to monitor the serum levels of IGF-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) 3, and IGFBP-2 during long-term GH treatment of 156 patients with GH deficiency (GHD) and of 153 non-GHD patients. We determined the extent to which the IGF parameters exceed the normal ranges and identified those parameters which are predictive of 1st-year growth. RESULTS: In prepubertal GHD children, the levels of IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 exceeded the 95th centile of the reference values for this age group in 2.3, 0.3, and 7.9% of the cases, respectively, whereas in prepubertal non-GHD children, the same parameters exceeded the 95th reference centile in 20.1, 3.5, and 32.2%, respectively. In pubertal GHD children IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 levels exceeded the 95th reference centile in 11.1, 1.5, and 15.4%, respectively. In pubertal non-GHD children, these levels also exceeded the 95th centile in 26.7, 7.0, and 41.4%, respectively. In both GHD and non-GHD groups, however, some patients had IGF parameters which were below the reference values. Our analysis showed that, in both groups, in addition to maximum GH, all IGF parameters (IGF-I, IGFBP-3, IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio, IGFBP-2 or derivatives) significantly extend the scope of a calculated model for predicting 1st-year height velocity. CONCLUSION: For reasons of safety and optimization of GH therapy, it is essential to follow up IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGFBP-2 levels regularly during childhood.     

European audit of current practice in diagnosis and treatment of childhood growth hormone deficiency

BACKGROUND: The present survey among members of the ESPE on current practice in diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is of great clinical relevance and importance in the light of the recently published guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of GHD by the Growth Hormone Research Society. We have found much conformity but also numerous discrepancies between the recommendations of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the current practice in Europe. RESULTS: We found that 80% of the pediatric endocrinologists included insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in their initial evaluation of a short child suspected of having GHD, whereas only 22% used GH provocative testing alone in the initial evaluation of a short child. Sixty-eight percent confirmed the diagnosis of GHD using two separate provocative tests. In the present survey cutoff values for GH provocative testing clustered around two values; 10 ng/ml and 20 mU/l. Interestingly, these two values, differing by a factor of 2, were also the most prevalent cutoff values among those who reported their assay to be calibrated against the WHO International Reference Preparation 80/505 where the conversion factor between milligrams and milliunits is 2.6. This suggests that the selection of cutoff values is based on tradition rather than on specific GH assay characteristics. In addition, only 63% of the respondents actually knew what GH assay they were using, and only 57% knew how their GH assay was calibrated. Dosing of GH at the start of treatment was reported according to body surface by 39%, whereas 59% were dosing according to body weight. GH dose adjustment was primarily based on growth response and height during auxological assessment every 3-4 months (height velocity, change in height velocity or change in height standard deviation scores) as indicated by almost 70% of the respondents. However, dose adjustment according to body surface (38%) and body weight (44%) was also quite common. Sixty-five percent measures IGF-I regularly (at least once a year) during GH therapy in children, and to our surprise 17% reported that they adjust the GH dose according to the IGF-I levels. SUMMARY: In summary, we have found large heterogeneity in the current practice of diagnosis and treatment of childhood GHD among European pediatric endocrinologists. Especially standardizations of GH assays and cutoff values are urgently required to ensure a uniform and correct diagnosis and therapy of GHD in the future.     

Plasma growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing factor (SM-8144) in children of short stature and patients with GH deficiency

Synthetic human GRF (hGRF (1-44) NH2; SM-8144) was administered as an iv bolus to 141 normal children of short stature (NSC), 73 patients with severe idiopathic GH deficiency (IGD; group A), 30 patients with mild idiopathic GH deficiency (IGD; group B), 29 patients with secondary GH deficiency, 3 patients with primary hypothyroidism, 21 patients with Turner's syndrome and 25 patients with various other disease. Their height was below normal for their age and sex, and they were all below 25 years old without obesity. The maximal GH responses (M+SEM) were 39.5 +/- 2.2, 7.2 +/- 0.9, 27.2 +/- 3.7, 5.2 +/- 0.8, 9.7 +/- 4.4, 25.1 +/- 2.8 and 32.3 +/- 4.8 ng/ml, respectively (significance from the NSC, ; p less than 0.05, ; p less than 0.001). The GH responses to hGRF were greater than those elicited by standard pharmacological tests. There was a negative correlation between bone age and peak plasma GH response to hGRF in patients with idiopathic GH deficiency (IGD) but not in normal children (NSC). In twenty-two percent of the patients with IGD in group A the response was above 10 ng/ml and in 57% of the patients with IGD in group B the response was above 20 ng/ml, suggesting that a large percentage of patients with idiopathic GH deficiency lack hypothalamic GRF. The side effect of flushing was observed in 15.2% of all subjects. These results indicate the potential usefulness of hGRF (1-44) NH2 (SM-8144) in inducing GH release from the pituitary.     

Oral clonidine provocative test in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in childhood: should we make the timing uniform?

INTRODUCTION: Oral clonidine is one of the most frequent drugs used for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD), but the duration of the test, depending on which European centres use it, is not uniform and can vary from 120 to 150 min or even 180 min. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: To standardize this test, evaluating the possibility to shorten it to 90 min, we investigated the response of GH to the oral clonidine test in 291 children evaluated for short stature (height <-2 SD). Of these, 164 were diagnosed as idiopathic short stature (ISS) and 127 as GHD. In these patients, we calculated: (1) the frequency distribution of the GH peaks to clonidine in GHD and in ISS at various times; (2) the percentage of GH peaks to clonidine before and after 90 min in all and in ISS children; (3) the percentage of the first GH value >or=10 ng/ml before 90 min and after 90 min in ISS. RESULTS: GH peak distribution varied between 30 and 180 min, even though the vast majority of peaks occurred between 30 and 60 min. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the peak distribution between ISS and GHD children. The percentages of GH peaks within 90 min were 92.1% in all children and 95.7% in ISS. If considering the first value of GH >or=10 ng/ml this last percentage reaches 96.3%. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the oral clonidine test can be administered for only 90 min without significantly changing its validity. This test should be standardized at 90 min in European protocols just as in those currently used in the USA in order to reduce the discomfort of patients and the cost of this diagnostic procedure.     

Growth hormone and neurofibromatosis

Data collected from 102 neurofibromatosis (NF) children with growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) who were receiving GH replacement therapy were reviewed to assess the efficacy and safety of GH therapy in this condition. GH was administered at a mean dose of 0. 18 mg/kg/week. During the 1st year the median height velocity increased significantly from 4.2 cm/year before treatment to 7.1 cm/year, and the median height standard deviation score increased from -2.4 to -1.9. The response to therapy, however, was not as good as that observed in patients with idiopathic GHD. GH therapy did not influence the progression of any of the features of NF, including intracranial tumours, and was not associated with an excess of other adverse events. We conclude that GH treatment of NF patients with GHD is beneficial in terms of improved growth rate and is well tolerated.     

Calcium supplementation increases bone mass in GH-deficient prepubertal children during GH replacement

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Since GH plays an important role in bone mineralization, and several studies demonstrated the positive influence of a higher calcium intake on bone mass, we studied the effect of calcium supplementation in GHD children during GH therapy. METHODS: 28 prepubertal GHD children, 5.0-9.9 years old, were assigned to two groups: group A (n = 14; 7 females) treated with GH, and group B (n = 14; 7 females) treated with GH + calcium gluconolactate and carbonate (1 g calcium/day per os). Auxological parameters, total bone mineral content (TBMC) and density (TBMD), leg BMC and BMD, lumbar BMD, fat mass (FM) and lean tissue mass (LTM), blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD), parathyroid hormone (PTH), osteocalcin (OC) and urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) were determined at the start of therapy and after 1 and 2 years of treatment. RESULTS: During the 2 years of the study, TBMC, TBMD, leg BMC and BMD (but not lumbar BMD) increased in both groups of patients, however after 2 years of treatment they were significantly higher in the calcium-supplemented group B than in group A (p < 0.05, for all parameters). At the start of therapy, in both groups of patients percentage FM was higher and total and leg LTM lower than in controls (p < 0.05 for each parameter). Thereafter, FM decreased and LTM increased and after 2 years they were both different from baseline (p < 0.05). After 2 years of treatment, leg BMC and BMD were more positively correlated with regional leg LTM in patients of group B (r = 0.834 and r = 0.827, respectively; p < 0.001) than in patients of group A (r = 0.617 and r = 0.637, respectively; p < 0.05). 25-OHD and PTH levels were in the normal range in all patients at the start and during treatment. OC levels were lower and urinary NTx levels higher in patients than in controls (p < 0.05 for both parameters), either at the start and after 1 year of treatment. After 2 years of treatment, OC levels were significantly higher than at the start of the study (p < 0.05) in both groups of patients, but they were higher in group B than in group A (p < 0.05); on the contrary, urinary Ntx levels were lower in group B than in group A (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In GHD children, treated with GH, calcium supplementation improved bone mass; it may aid in reaching better peak bone mass and in protecting weight-bearing bones, usually completed in childhood to maximum levels, from risk of osteoporosis and fractures later in life.     

Growth hormone treatment downregulates serum leptin levels in children independent of changes in body mass index

The changes in serum leptin levels during growth hormone (GH) treatment were studied in 27 children, 17 with GH deficiency (GHD), 10 with idiopathic short stature (ISS), and 9 with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). Within 1 month of GH treatment, serum leptin levels decreased by 40% in the GHD children (p < 0.01). There was no significant change in serum leptin level in the children with ISS. In children with PWS, the mean serum leptin level decreased by almost 60% after 3 months of treatment (p < 0.001). Thereafter, no further decline was observed in any of the 3 groups. Changes in body composition became evident first after the 3 months of treatment. In the GHD children, the BMI was unchanged while the mean body fat percentage was 2.7% lower after 1 year of GH treatment (p < 0.05). In the ISS children, neither BMI nor body fat percentage were significantly changed during treatment. The PWS children exhibited a significant decrease in BMI after 6 months of GH treatment without any further change during the remaining period of treatment. In this group, the mean body fat percentage decreased from 42 +/- 2.4 to 28 +/- 2.2% after treatment (p < 0.001). The finding that the fall in leptin occurs before changes in body composition become detectable suggests a direct effect of GH on leptin production, metabolism, or clearance.     

Plasma growth hormone response to synthetic GH-RH1-44 in 52 children and adults with growth hormone deficiency of various etiologies

52 patients (42 children and 10 adults) with growth hormone deficiency (GHD), grouped into four diagnostic categories, and 6 children with constitutional short stature who served as controls were tested for plasma GH response to synthetic GH-RH1-44 given in an intravenous bolus. The response was classified into three degrees according to the magnitude of the maximal rise: Good, greater than 9 ng/ml; Partial, 3.1-9.0 ng/ml; None, less than or equal to 3 ng/ml. Among the GHD patients the highest response was observed in patients with partial growth hormone deficiency (PGHD), and 60% of the children with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) showed an increase in plasma GH levels. Nevertheless, the response of the GHD patients was lower than that in the control group. In the children and adolescents with PGHD and IGHD the response was not age related. Among those with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies-idiopathic (MPHD-ID) there was no response in the adolescents although a hypothalamic disorder had been documented by other tests. Among those with MPHD-organic (MPHD-ORG) the GH-RH stimulated GH secretion in the patients with glioma, who had received only irradiation treatment, and in the youngest of the patients with craniopharyngioma. Of the 10 young adults tested none showed a good response. It is concluded that GH-RH is useful in differentiating between GH deficiency of hypothalamic origin and that of pituitary origin, and in selecting those patients who might benefit from long-term treatment with GH-RH in the future.     

Effect of growth hormone-releasing factor on plasma growth hormone, prolactin and somatomedin C in hypopituitary and short normal children

We studied the effect of a single intravenous bolus of 0.5 microgram/kg of growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) on plasma GH, prolactin (PRL) and somatomedin C (SMC) in 12 short normal children and 24 patients with severe GH deficiency (GHD), i.e. GH less than 5 ng/ml after insulin and glucagon tolerance tests. GRF elicited an increase in plasma GH in both short normal and GHD children. The mean GH peak was lower in the GHD than in the short normal children (8.2 +/- 2.5 vs. 39.2 +/- 5.1 ng/ml, p less than 0.001). In the GHD patients (but not in the short normals) there was a negative correlation between bone age and peak GH after GRF (r = -0.58, p less than 0.005); GH peaks within the normal range were seen in 5 out of 8 GHD children with a bone age less than 5 years. In the short normal children, GRF had no effect on plasma PRL, which decreased continuously between 8.30 and 11 a.m. (from 206 +/- 22 to 86 +/- 10 microU/ml, p less than 0.005), a reflection of its circadian rhythm. In the majority of the GHD patients, PRL levels were higher than in the short normal children but had the same circadian rhythm, except that a slight increase in PRL was observed 15 min after GRF; this increase in PRL was seen both in children with isolated GHD and in those with multiple hormone deficiencies; it did occur in some GHD patients who had no GH response to GRF. Serum SMC did not change 24 h after GRF in the short normal children. We conclude that: (1) in short normal children: (a) the mean GH response to a single intravenous bolus of 0.5 microgram/kg of GRF is similar to that reported in young adults and (b) GRF has no effect on PRL secretion; (2) in GHD patients: (a) normal GH responses to GRF are seen in patients with a bone age less than 5 years and establish the integrity of the somatotrophs in those cases; (b) the GH responsiveness to GRF decreases with age, which probably reflects the duration of endogenous GRF deficiency, and (c) although the PRL response to GRF is heterogeneous, it does in some patients provide additional evidence of responsive pituitary tissue.     

Stepping into adulthood: the transition period

The period of growth from late puberty to full adult maturation, termed the transition period, is important for tissue maturation. Peak bone mass, muscle mass and strength are usually attained in this period. However, it is common clinical practice in children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) to discontinue growth hormone (GH) treatment in adolescence after attainment of final height. Therefore, patients with childhood-onset GHD that continues into adulthood and who do not receive treatment as adults may experience more severe consequences than patients who acquire GHD as an adult. Recent studies indicate that bone and muscle maturation are attenuated if GH treatment is discontinued at final height. Furthermore, these patients will also develop cardiovascular risk factors that are normally associated with GHD in adults. Much debate surrounds when retesting for GHD should be carried out and when GH treatment should be restarted in adolescents; many of these patients will not have severe GHD according to the criteria set for adults. The transition period is an appropriate time to modify GH doses. Finally, registries exist that have recorded clinical treatment experiences for children and adults. Tools that collect and analyse data provide an important opportunity to investigate issues related to transition.     

Changes of thyroid function during long-term hGH therapy in GHD children. A possible relationship with catch-up growth?

BACKGROUND: Growth hormone (GH) treatment in patients with GH deficiency (GHD) can determine changes in the thyroid function. The clinical significance of these changes remains controversial, and all studies have so far covered rather a short period--usually no longer than one year. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of long-term recombinant hGH treatment in children with idiopathic GHD on the thyroid function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen prepubertal children (12 boys and 7 girls, mean age 9.2 +/- 3.1 years) with idiopathic GHD were studied and followed for twenty-four months. None of the patients showed multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies. Nineteen healthy children matched for age and sex acted as controls. RESULTS: Patients with GHD showed a significant increase in TT (3) at twelve months and in FT (3) at six and twelve months after starting GH treatment, with a significant decrease at eighteen and twenty-four months. TT (4) level decreased significantly at twelve months and increased significantly at eighteen and twenty-four months. FT (4) also decreased, but only slightly, after twelve months of hGH treatment, and then increased significantly at twenty-four months. TSH levels did not vary significantly during the course of therapy. TT (3)/TT (4) and FT (3)/FT (4) ratios increased significantly after six and twelve months of therapy and significantly decreased later, approaching pre-therapy values. The SDS of Growth Velocity (SDS-GV) increased remarkably during the first year of therapy and then decreased significantly during the second year, although it remained significantly higher than the pre-therapy values. TT (3) and TT (3)/TT (4) ratio displayed a significant correlation with SDS-GV at twelve months of therapy. In a multiple regression analysis with age, bone age, parental height, GH dose, TT (3,) TT (3)/TT (4), and the SDS of IGF-I, only the TT (3)/TT (4) ratio at twelve months of therapy (p < 0.001) was identified as a significant predictor of SDS-GV. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that changes in thyroid function are present in GHD children during long-term hGH therapy. These changes probably resulted from the effect of hGH on the peripheral metabolism of thyroid hormones and appear to be transitory, disappearing during the second year of hGH treatment. We speculate on the functional significance of these changes, and in particular, on their role in catch-up growth after hGH therapy.     

Plasma levels of total and active ghrelin in acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency

Ghrelin is an endogenous growth hormone (GH) secretagogue recently isolated from the stomach. Although it possesses a strong GH releasing activity in vitro and in vivo, its physiological significance in endogenous GH secretion remains unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize plasma ghrelin levels in acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency (GHD). We investigated plasma total and active ghrelin in 21 patients with acromegaly, 9 patients with GHD and 24 age-, sex- and BMI-matched controls. In all subjects, we further assessed the concentrations of leptin, soluble leptin receptor, insulin, IGF-I, free IGF-I and IGFBP-1, 2, 3 and 6. Patients with acromegaly and GHD as well as control subjects showed similar levels of total ghrelin (controls 2.004+/-0.18 ng/ml, acromegalics 1.755+/-0.16 ng/ml, p=0.31, GHD patients 1.704+/-0.17 ng/ml, p=0.35) and active ghrelin (controls 0.057+/-0.01 ng/ml, acromegalics 0.047+/-0.01 ng/ml, p=0.29, GHD patients 0.062+/-0.01 ng/ml, p=0.73). In acromegalic patients plasma total ghrelin values correlated negatively with IGF-I (p<0.05), in GHD patients active ghrelin correlated with IGF-I positively (p<0.05). In the control group, total ghrelin correlated positively with IGFBP-2 (p<0.05) and negatively with active ghrelin (p=0.05), BMI (p<0.05), WHR (p<0.05), insulin (p=0.01) and IGF-I (p=0.05). Plasma active ghrelin correlated positively with IGFBP-3 (p=0.005) but negatively with total ghrelin and free IGF-I (p=0.01). In conclusion, all groups of the tested subjects showed similar plasma levels of total and active ghrelin. In acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency plasma ghrelin does not seem to be significantly affected by changes in GH secretion.