Afferent mechanism of cortical myoclonus studied by proprioception-related SEPs

Proprioception-related somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to passive flexion movement of the middle finger at proximal interphalangeal joint were recorded in 7 patients with myoclonus of cortical origin who demonstrated enlarged electrical SEPs (giant SEPs). In 3 out of the 7 patients, the proprioception-related SEPs were also enlarged. The remaining 4 patients showed giant electrical SEPs without enhancement of proprioception-related SEPs. Long loop electromyographic response was recorded during the resting condition in all of the 3 patients with enlarged proprioception-related SEPs. We have previously reported that proprioception-related SEPs are mainly generated by muscle afferent inputs, though electrical SEPs are thought to reflect mostly cutaneous inputs with some contribution from muscle afferents. Therefore, it is concluded that hyperexcitability of the sensorimotor cortex in cortical myoclonus is modality-specific. Cortical excitability is exaggerated to both cutaneous and deep receptor inputs in some patients, but only to cutaneous input in others.     

Somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex as studied in scalp EEG

We recorded somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in scalp EEGs during stimulation of the median nerve, the ulnar nerve and the individual digits in 3 normal subjects and in 1 epilepsy patients. In this patient we also measured SEPs from chronically indwelling subdural grid electrodes during electrocorticography (ECoG). We applied dipole modelling techniques to study the 3-dimensional intracerebral locations and time activities of the neuronal sources underlying stimulation of different peripheral receptive fields. The sources underlying median nerve SEPs were located an average of 10.8 mm lateral inferior to those underlying ulnar nerve SEPs. Digit SEP sources showed a somatotopic arrangement from lateral inferior to medial superior in the order thumb, index finger, middle finger, ring finger and little finger, with some overlap or reversal for adjacent digits. The average distance between thumb and little finger was 12.5 mm. Thumb, index finger and middle finger were clustered around median nerve cortical representation, whereas ring finger and little finger were arranged around ulnar nerve cortex. In the epilepsy patient, the source localizations obtained in scalp EEGs showed good agreement with those on ECoGs. We conclude that SEPs recorded in scalp EEGs can be used to study functional topography of human somatosensory cortex non-invasively.     

Somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex revealed by dipole source analysis of early somatosensory evoked potentials and 3D-NMR tomography

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve and finger stimulation were analyzed by means of spatio-temporal dipole modelling combined with 3D-NMR tomography in 8 normal subjects. The early SEPs were modelled by 3 equivalent dipoles located in the region of the brain-stem (B) and in the region of the contralateral somatosensory cortex (T and R). Dipole B explained peaks P14 and N18 at the scalp. Dipole T was tangentially oriented and explained the N20-P20, dipole R was radially oriented and modelled the P22. The tangential dipole sources T were located within a distance of 6 mm on the average and all were less than 9 mm from the posterior bank of the central sulcus. In 6 subjects the tangential sources related to finger stimulation arranged along the central sulcus according to the known somatotopy. The radial sources did not show a consistent somatotopic alignment across subjects. We conclude that the combination of dipole source analysis and 3D-NMR tomography is a useful tool for functional localization within the human hand somatosensory cortex.     

Somatosensory evoked potentials after removal of somatosensory cortex in man

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve, ulnar nerve, thumb, middle finger, and posterior tibial nerve stimulation were recorded in a patient with a discrete resection of part of the postcentral somatosensory cortex as a treatment for focal epilepsy. Comparison of the different stimulation sites confirmed electrophysiologically the restricted locus of the lesion. The results strongly suggest that the early negative component (N20) and subsequent components recorded postcentrally are of cortical origin and depend upon postcentral gyrus cytoarchitectonic areas 3, 2, and 1. Moreover, these postcentral SEPs are distinct from precentrally recorded activity.     

SEPs to finger joint input lack the N20-P20 response that is evoked by tactile inputs: contrast between cortical generators in areas 3b and 2 in humans

A method using a DC servo motor is described to produce brisk angular movements at finger interphalangeal joints in humans. Small passive flexions of 2° elicited sizable somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) starting with a contralateral positive P34 parietal response thought to reflect activation of a radial equivalent dipole generator in area 2 which receives joint inputs. By contrast, electric stimulation of tactile (non-joint) inputs from the distal phalanx evoked the usual contralateral negative N20 reflecting a tangential equivalent dipole generator in area 3b. Finger joint inputs also evoked a precentral positivity equivalent to the P22 of motor area 4, and a large frontal negativity equivalent to N30. It is suggested that natural stimulation allows human SEP components to the differentiated in conjunction with distinct cortical somatotopic projections.     

Upper limb H reflexes and somatosensory evoked potentials modulated by movement.

In the human lower limb, the magnitudes of both Hoffmann (H) reflexes and primary somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) from scalp electrodes, are reduced by active and/or passive movement. We surmised that similar effects occur for the upper limb and specifically hypothesised that amplitudes of median nerve induced flexor carpii radialis H reflexes and cortical SEPs are reduced with passive movement about the wrist or elbow. The results showed (P<0. 05) that either movement significantly attenuated mean magnitudes of SEPs elicited from stimulation at elbow or wrist and that reflex magnitudes attenuated with wrist movement. Thus, the upper limb shows similar movement-induced modulation to the lower limb. These attenuations of fast conducting sensory paths consequent to movement per se, may be a basic level of motor control, initiated from muscle mechanoreceptor discharge. Upon this basic level, more complex modulations then may be laid as appropriate for the particular characteristics of active motor tasks.     

Scalp topography of mechanically and electrically evoked somatosensory potentials in man

Scalp topography of somatosensory evoked potentials following mechanical (SEPs(M)) and electrical (SEPs(E)) stimulation of the left middle finger was investigated with linked ear reference in 21 normal young adults. A small plastic ball (touch) or needle (pain) was used for the mechanical stimulation. With mechanical stimulation, at least 3 positive and 3 negative potentials (P19(M), N24(M), P29(M), N36(M), P49(M) and N61(M)) were found in the post-rolandic area contralateral to the stimulation. The wave form in SEPs(M) was similar to those in SEPs(E), but the peak latency of each component in SEPs(M) was 1–4 msec longer than that in SEPs(E). Earlier components such as P19(M), N24(M) and P29(M) were not as clearly recognized as corresponding components in SEPs(E). However, the wave form recorded on the hemisphere ipsilateral to the stimulation or in the frontal area contralateral to the stimulation showed a greater difference from subject to subject. P19(M), N24(M) and P29(M) correlated positively both with arm length and height of the subject. There was no significant difference of the wave form between the linked ear reference and the bipolar (C4-Fz) derivation. Wave form of SEPs(M) by needle stimulation did not significantly differ from that by plastic ball stimulation.     

Pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials following CO2 laser stimulation of foot in man

Since our previous study of pain somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) following CO₂ laser stimulation of the hand dorsum could not clarify whether the early cortical component NI was generated from the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) or the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) or both, the scalp topography of SEPs following CO₂ laser stimulation of the foot dorsum was studied in 10 normal subjects and was compared with that of the hand pain SEPs and the conventional SEPs following electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve recorded in 8 and 6 of the 10 subjects, respectively. Three components (N1, N2 and P2) were recorded for both foot and hand pain SEPs. N1 of the foot pain SEPs was maximal at the midline electrodes (Cz or CPz) in all data where that potential was recognized, but the potential field distribution was variable among subjects and even between two sides within the same subject. N1 of the hand pain SEPs was maximal at the contralateral central or midtemporal electrode. The scalp distribution of N2 and P2, however, was not different between the foot and hand pain SEPs. The mean peak latency of N1 following stimulation of foot and hand was found to be 191 msec and 150 msec, respectively, but there was no significant difference in the interpeak latency of Nl-N2 between foot and hand stimulation. It is therefore concluded that NI of the foot pain SEPs is generated mainly from the foot area of SI. The variable scalp distribution of the N7 component of the foot pain SEPs is likely due to an anatomical variability among subjects and even between sides.     

Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and potentials following passive toe movement in humans

The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) and evoked potentials (SEPs) following passive toe movement were studied in 10 normal subjects. Five main components were identified in SEFs recorded around the vertex around the foot area of the primary sensory cortex (SI). The first and second components, 1M and 2M, were identified at approximately 35 and 46 ms. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of both 1M and 2M were estimated around SI in the hemisphere contralateral to the movement toe, and were probably generated in area 3a or area 2, which mainly receive inputs ascending through muscle and joint afferents. The large inter-individual difference of 1M and 2M in terms of ECD orientation was probably due to a large anatomical variance of the foot area of SI. The third and fourth components, 3M and 4M, were identified at approximately 62 ms and 87 ms, respectively. They appeared to be a single large long-duration component with two peaks. Since the 3M and 4M components were significantly larger than the 1M and 2M components in amplitude and their ECD location was significantly superior to that of 1M and 2M, we suspected that they were generated in different sites from those of 1M and 2M, probably area 3b or area 4. Four components, 1E, 2E, 3E and 4E, were identified in SEPs, which appeared to correspond to 1M, 2M, 3M and 4M, respectively. The variation observed in the scalp distribution of the primary component, 1E, could be accounted for by the variation of the orientation of ECD of the 1M component. There was a large difference in the waveform of the long-latency component (longer than 100 ms) between SEFs and SEPs. The 5E of SEPs was a large amplitude component, but the 5M of SEFs was small or absent. We speculate that this long-latency component was generated by multiple generators.     

Selectivity of attenuation (i.e., gating) of somatosensory potentials during voluntary movement in humans

Attenuation of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPS) recorded from the scalp during voluntary movement occurs for specific combinations of the finger moved and the peripheral nerve stimulated. The cerebral potential component occurring at a latency of 27 msec (P27) evoked either by stimulation of median nerve at the wrist or by stimulation of 1st and 2nd digit nerves in the fingers were selectively attenuated during movement of 1st digit but were not altered during movement of 5th digit. By contrast, the cerebral P27 component evoked by stimulation of ulnar nerve at the wrist or by stimulation of 5th digital nerve were attenuated during movement of that digit but were not altered during movement of 1st digit. Gating of somatosensory activity is a selective phenomenon occuring when movement involves the areas being stimulated.     

Comparison of the effects of four anaesthetic agents on somatosensory evoked potentials in the rat

Electrophysiological techniques provide an objective and non-invasive measure of neurological function. In order to undertake detailed evoked potential studies in rats on repeated occasions, it is necessary to find an appropriate anaesthetic agent which has minimal and reproducible effects on the parameters to be studied and also has a minimal effect on the general welfare of the animals. In this study we compared the effects of four common anaesthetic agents (ketamine-xylazine, medetomidine, isoflurane and fentanyl/fluanisone-midazolam) on somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in rats following electrical stimulation of the fore- and hind-paw. Fentanyl/fluanisone-midazolam was found to be well tolerated by the animals and to have, in general, the least deleterious effect on SEPs. For example, the response recorded at the level of the somatosensory cortex (P1), following forelimb stimulation, appeared on average 1.80 ms earlier with fentanyl/fluanisone-midazolam than with the other agents and the peak-to-peak amplitude (CI to CII) of the response recorded at the cervical (C3) level was on average 5.86 microV greater with fentanyl/fluanisone-midazolam. Fentanyl/fluanisone-midazolam is, therefore, recommended as the anaesthetic of choice for longitudinal studies of SEPs in the rat.     

Serial recording of sensory,corticomotor, and brainstem-derived motor evoked potentials in the rat

A method is presented for serial recording of corticomotor evoked potentials (CMEPs), brainstem-derived motor evoked potentials (BMEPs), and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) via permanently implanted cranial screws. One screw was positioned posterior to lambda (posterior screw), and two screws were positioned over the cortical hind limb areas (cortical screws). SEPs were elicited by stimulation of the hind paw and recorded from the contralateral cortex. BMEPs were stimulated via the posterior screw and recorded from both hind limbs, whereas CMEPs were elicited by repeated bipolar stimulation of the cortex and recorded from the contralateral hind limb. BMEPs and CMEPs differed in several points and can be considered as completely separate motor evoked potentials. While BMEPs consisted of a prominent negative peak with short latency (5–7.5 ms), CMEPs were represented by polyphasic signals with long latencies (17–22 ms). The cortical origin of the CMEPs was confirmed by transecting the corticospinal tracts, which abolished the CMEPs but spared the BMEPs. SEPs consisted of three consecutive peaks with mean latencies of the initial peak ranging between 15 and 17 ms. Dorsal column transection also abolished SEPs. In healthy rats, all three signals were recorded for six consecutive weeks. Signal parameters did not change significantly within this observation period. Rats tolerated the screws and the repeated measurements very well and no negative affect on animal behavior was noted. Thus, this method allows serial recording of SEPs, CMEPs, and BMEPs in chronic rat models.     

Serial recording of sensory, corticomotor, and brainstem-derived motor evoked potentials in the rat

A method is presented for serial recording of corticomotor evoked potentials (CMEPs), brainstem-derived motor evoked potentials (BMEPs), and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) via permanently implanted cranial screws. One screw was positioned posterior to lambda (posterior screw), and two screws were positioned over the cortical hind limb areas (cortical screws). SEPs were elicited by stimulation of the hind paw and recorded from the contralateral cortex. BMEPs were stimulated via the posterior screw and recorded from both hind limbs, whereas CMEPs were elicited by repeated bipolar stimulation of the cortex and recorded from the contralateral hind limb. BMEPs and CMEPs differed in several points and can be considered as completely separate motor evoked potentials. While BMEPs consisted of a prominent negative peak with short latency (5-7.5 ms), CMEPs were represented by polyphasic signals with long latencies (17-22 ms). The cortical origin of the CMEPs was confirmed by transecting the corticospinal tracts, which abolished the CMEPs but spared the BMEPs. SEPs consisted of three consecutive peaks with mean latencies of the initial peak ranging between 15 and 17 ms. Dorsal column transection also abolished SEPs. In healthy rats, all three signals were recorded for six consecutive weeks. Signal parameters did not change significantly within this observation period. Rats tolerated the screws and the repeated measurements very well and no negative affect on animal behavior was noted. Thus, this method allows serial recording of SEPs, CMEPs, and BMEPs in chronic rat models.     

The assessment of severe head injury by short-latency somatosensory and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials

The relative prognostic value of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) was assessed in 35 patients with post-traumatic coma. Analysis of the evoked potentials was restricted to those recorded within the first 4 days following head injury. Abnormal SEPs were defined as an increase in central somatosensory conduction time or an absence of the initial cortical potential following stimulation of either median nerve. Abnormal BAEPs were classified as an increase in the wave I–V interval or the loss of any or all of its 3 most stable components (waves I, III and V) following stimulation of either ear. SEPs reliably both good and bad outcomes. All 17 patients in whom SEPs were graded as normal had a favourable outcome and 15 of 18 patients in whom SEPs were abnormal had an unfavourable outcome. Although abnormal BAEPs were associated with an unfavourable outcome in almost all patients (6 of 7), only 19 of 28 patients with normal BAEPs had a favourable outcome. The finding of normal BAEPs was therefore of little prognostic significance. These results confirm the superiority and greater sensitivity of the SEP in detecting abnormalities of brain function shortly after severe head trauma.     

The interaction of the somatosensory evoked potentials to simultaneous finger stimuli in the human central nervous system. A study using direct recordings

In order to investigate the interaction of sensory electrophysiologic fields arising from the adjacent second (II) and third (III) fingers and the distant second and fifth (V) fingers, direct recordings of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were performed from the sensory and motor cortices, the sensory thalamic nucleus (nucleus ventralis caudalis, VC) and the cuneate nucleus in humans during neurosurgical operations. Electrical stimulation was given to the II, III or V fingers individually, and also to pairs of either the II and III fingers or the II and V fingers simultaneously. The interaction ratio OR) was devised as the ratio of amplitude attenuation caused by the simultaneous stimulation to two fingers compared with the amplitude of the arithmetically summed SEPs to the individual stimulation of two fingers. The IRs were calculated on N20 and P25 from the sensory cortex, P22 from the motor cortex, P17_thal from the VC, and N16_cune and P35_cune from the cuneate nucleus.With both stimulations to the II and III fingers and the II and V fingers, P25 showed the greatest IR, followed by P22, then by P17_thal while N16_cune exhibited the smallest IR. N20 and P35_cune showed similar IRs and significantly greater IRs with II and III finger stimulation compared with II and V finger stimulation.These results thus indicate that the interaction of somatosensory impulses occurs in several structures along the sensory pathway in CNS, including the cuneate nucleus, the sensory thalamic nucleus, as well as sensory and motor cortices, with the greatest IRs in the cerebral cortices and the weakest ones in the brain-stem. They also suggest that the receptive fields of the fingers in the cortical area generating N20 are arranged according to the order of the fingers while those in the generating sites for cortical P25 and P22, thalamic P17_thal and cuneate N16_cune tend to be arranged in clusters, while P35_cune is possibly modulated by the somatosensory cortex through a long-loop feedback pathway.     

Giant central N20-P22 with normal area 3b N20-P20: an argument in favour of an area 3a generator of early median nerve cortical SEPs?

Generators of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) still remain to be precisely localised. This gap in knowledge has often resulted in unclear and contrasting SEPs localisation in patients with focal hemispheric lesions. We recorded SEPs to median nerve stimulation in a patient with right frontal astrocytoma, using a 19-channel recording technique. After stimulation of the left median nerve, N20 amplitude was normal when recorded by the parietal electrode contralateral to the stimulation, while it was abnormally enhanced in traces obtained by the contralateral central electrode. The amplitude of the frontal P20 response was within normal limits. This finding suggests that two dipolar sources, tangential and radial to the scalp surface, respectively, contribute concomitantly to N20 generation. The possible location of the N20 radial source in area 3a is discussed. The P22 potential was also recorded with increased amplitude by the central electrode contralateral to the stimulation, while N30 amplitude was normal in frontal and central traces. We propose that the radial dipolar source of P22 response is independent from both N20 and N30 generators and can be located either in 3a or in area 4. This report illustrates the usefulness of multichannel recordings in diagnosing dysfunction of the sensorimotor cortex in focal cortical lesions.     

Pyramidal tract function during onset of brain death

In 51 patients with primary brain lesions, who fulfilled the criteria of brain death, sequential recording of transcranial magnetic evoked potentials (TMEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were performed.In all comatose patients with apnoeic cranial nerve areflexia the TMEP could not be elicited, while the response after cervical magnetic stimulation was always preserved. Similarly, no cortical SEPs were preserved in apnoeic cranial nerve areflexia; however, the cervical somatosensory response was preserved in 44%.In deteriorating patients with coma grade III TMEPs were preserved in 3 instances, while cortical SEPs were already absent. Current brain death criteria, however, were not challenged, as TMEPs were absent in all 51 patients, at the latest when apnoea was noted.     

Steady-state analysis of somatosensory evoked potentials

We report the development of a new method for frequency domain analysis of steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to amplitude-modulated electrical stimulation, which can be recorded in significantly less time than traditional SEPs. Resampling techniques were used to compare the steady-state SEP to traditional SEP recordings, which are based on signal averaging in the time domain of cortical responses to repetitive transient stimulation and take 1–2 min or more to obtain a satisfactory signal/noise ratio. Median nerves of 3 subjects were stimulated continuously with electrical alternating current at several modulation frequencies from 7 to 41 Hz. Amplitude modulation was used to concentrate the power in higher frequencies, away from the modulation frequency, to reduce the amount of stimulus artifact recorded. Data were tested for signal detectability in the frequency domain using the T_circ² statistic. A reliable steady-state response can be recorded from scalp electrodes overlying somatosensory cortex in only a few seconds. In contrast, no signal was statistically discriminable from noise in the transient SEP from as much as 20 s of data. This dramatic time savings accompanying steady-state somatosensory stimulation may prove useful for monitoring in the operating room or intensive care unit.     

Short-Latency Afferent Inhibition Modulation during Finger Movement

When somatosensory input via electrical stimulation of a peripheral nerve precedes a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulse over the primary motor cortex (M1) the corticospinal output is substantially reduced, a phenomenon known as short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI). The present study investigated SAI during rest and during pre-movement, phasic and tonic components of movement. Participants were required to perform an index finger flexion reaction time task in response to an auditory cue. In a series of experiments, SAI was evoked from the mixed, median nerve at the wrist or the cutaneous, digital nerve stimulation of the index finger. To assess the spinal versus cortical origin of movement-related modulation of SAI, F-wave amplitudes were measured during rest and the three movement components. Results indicated that SAI was reduced during all movement components compared to rest, an effect that occurred for both nerves stimulated. Pre-movement SAI reduction was primarily attributed to reduced cortical inhibition, while increased spinal excitability additionally contributed to reduced SAI during tonic and phasic components of movement. SAI was differentially modulated across movement components with mixed but not cutaneous nerve stimulation. These findings reveal that SAI is reduced during movement and this reduction begins as early as the preparation to move. Further, these data suggest that the degree of SAI reduction during movement may be specific to the volume and/or composition of afferent input carried by each nerve.     

Effect of manipulation and fractionated finger movements on subcortical sensory activity in man

Previous studies have shown that the somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) recorded from the scalp are modified or gated during motor activity in man. Animal studies show corticospinal tract terminals in afferent relays, viz. dorsal horn of spinal cord, dorsal column nuclei and thalamus. Is the attenuation of the SEP during movement the result of gating in subcortical nuclei? This study has investigated the effect of manipulation and fractionated finger movements of the hand on the subcortically generated short latency SEPs in 9 healthy subjects. Left median nerve SEPs were recorded with electrodes optimally placed to record subcortical activity with the least degree of contamination. There was no statistically significant change in amplitude or latency of the P9, N11, N13, P14, N18 and N20 potentials during rest or voluntary movement of the fingers of the left hand or manipulation of objects placed in the hand. The shape of the N13 wave form was not modified during these 3 conditions. It is concluded that in man attenuation of cortical waves during manipulation is not due to an effect of gating in the subcortical sensory relay nuclei.