FTY720 (Gilenya) phosphate selectivity of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor subtype 1 (S1P1) G protein-coupled receptor requires motifs in intracellular loop 1 and transmembrane domain 2

FTY720 phosphate (FTY720P) is a high potency agonist for all the endothelial differentiation gene family sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptors except S1P receptor subtype 2 (S1P(2)). To map the distinguishing features of S1P(2) ligand recognition, we applied a computational modeling-guided mutagenesis strategy that was based on the high degree of sequence homology between S1P(1) and S1P(2). S1P(2) point mutants of the ligand-binding pocket were characterized. The head group-interacting residues Arg3.28, Glu3.29, and Lys7.34 were essential for activation. Mutation of residues Ala3.32, Leu3.36, Val5.41, Phe6.44, Trp6.48, Ser7.42, and Ser7.46, predicted to interact with the S1P hydrophobic tail, impaired activation by S1P. Replacing individual or multiple residues in the ligand-binding pocket of S1P(2) with S1P(1) sequence did not impart activation by FTY720P. Chimeric S1P(1)/S1P(2) receptors were generated and characterized for activation by S1P or FTY720P. The S1P(2) chimera with S1P(1) sequence from the N terminus to transmembrane domain 2 (TM2) was activated by FTY720P, and the S1P(2)(IC1-TM2)(S1P1) domain insertion chimera showed S1P(1)-like activation. Twelve residues in this domain, distributed in four motifs a-d, differ between S1P(1) and S1P(2). Insertion of (78)RPMYY in motif b alone or simultaneous swapping of five other residues in motifs c and d from S1P(1) into S1P(2) introduced FTY720P responsiveness. Molecular dynamics calculations indicate that FTY720P binding selectivity is a function of the entropic contribution to the binding free energy rather than enthalpic contributions and that preferred agonists retain substantial flexibility when bound. After exposure to FTY720P, the S1P(2)(IC1-TM2)(S1P1) receptor recycled to the plasma membrane, indicating that additional structural elements are required for the selective degradative trafficking of S1P(1).     

Conserved aromatic residues in the transmembrane region VI of the V1a vasopressin receptor differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.

Despite their opposite effects on signal transduction, the nonapeptide hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and its V1a receptor-selective cyclic peptide antagonist d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP display homologous primary structures, differing only at residues 1 and 2. These structural similarities led us to hypothesize that both ligands could interact with the same binding pocket in the V1a receptor. To determine receptor residues responsible for discriminating binding of agonist and antagonist ligands, we performed site-directed mutagenesis of conserved aromatic and hydrophilic residues as well as nonconserved residues, all located in the transmembrane binding pocket of the V1a receptor. Mutation of aromatic residues of transmembrane region VI (W304, F307, F308) reduced affinity for the d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP and markedly decreased affinity for the unrelated strongly hydrophobic V1a-selective nonpeptide antagonist SR 49059. Replacement of these aromatic residues had no effect on AVP binding, but increased AVP-induced coupling efficacy of the receptor for its G protein. Mutating hydrophilic residues Q108, K128 and Q185 in transmembrane regions II, III and IV, respectively, led to a decrease in affinity for both agonists and antagonists. Finally, the nonconserved residues T333 and A334 in transmembrane region VII, controlled the V1a/V2 binding selectivity for both nonpeptide and cyclic peptide antagonists. Thus, because conserved aromatic residues of the V1a receptor binding pocket seem essential for antagonists and do not contribute at all to the binding of agonists, we propose that these residues differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.     

Analysis of the third transmembrane domain of the human type 1 angiotensin II receptor by cysteine scanning mutagenesis

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors by agonists involves significant movement of transmembrane domains (TMD) following agonist binding. The underlying structural mechanism by which receptor activation takes place is largely unknown but can be inferred by detecting variability within the environment of the ligand-binding pocket, which is a water-accessible crevice surrounded by the seven TMD helices. Using the substituted-cysteine accessibility method, we identified the residues within the third TMD of the wild-type angiotensin II (AT1) receptor that contribute to the formation of the binding site pocket. Each residue within the Ile103-Tyr127 region was mutated one at a time to a cysteine. Treating the A104C, N111C, and L112C mutant receptors with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA) strongly inhibited ligand binding, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT1 receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was altered for TMD3 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active AT1 receptor. Indeed, two additional mutants (S109C and V116C) were found to be sensitive to MTSEA treatment. Our results suggest that constitutive activation of the AT1 receptor causes a minor counterclockwise rotation of TMD3, thereby exposing residues, which are not present in the inactive state, to the binding pocket. This pattern of accessibility of residues in the TMD3 of the AT1 receptor parallels that of homologous residues in rhodopsin. This study identified key elements of TMD3 that contribute to the activation of class A G protein-coupled receptors through structural rearrangements.     

Comparison of the amino acid residues in the sixth transmembrane domains accessible in the binding-site crevices of mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors.

We have mapped the residues in the sixth transmembrane domains (TMs 6) of the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors that are accessible in the binding-site crevices by the substituted cysteine accessibility method (SCAM). We previously showed that ligand binding to the C7.38S mutants of the mu and kappa receptors and the wild-type delta receptor was relatively insensitive to methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium (MTSEA), a positively charged sulfhydryl-specific reagent. These MTSEA-insensitive constructs were used as the templates, and 22 consecutive residues in TM6 (excluding C6.47) of each receptor were mutated to cysteine, 1 at a time. Most mutants retained binding affinities for [3H]diprenorphine, a nonselective opioid antagonist, similar to that of the template receptors. Treatment with MTSEA significantly inhibited [3H]diprenorphine binding to 11 of 22 mutants of the rat mu receptor and 9 of 22 mutants of the human delta receptor and 10 of 22 mutants of the human kappa receptor. Naloxone or diprenorphine protected all sensitive mutants, except the A6.42(287)C mu mutant. Thus, V6.40, F6.44, W6.48, I6.51, Y6.54, V6.55, I6.56, I6.57, K6.58, and A6.59 of the mu receptor; F6.44, I6.51, F6.54, V6.55, I6.56, V6.57, W6.58, T6.59, and L6.60 of the delta receptor; and F6.44, W6.48, I6.51, F6.54, I6.55, L6.56, V6.57, E6.58, A6.59, and L6.60 of the kappa receptor are on the water-accessible surface of the binding-site crevices. The accessibility patterns of residues in the TMs 6 of the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors are consistent with the notion that the TMs 6 are in alpha-helical conformations with a narrow strip of accessibility on the intracellular side of 6.54 and a wider area of accessibility on the extracellular side of 6.54, likely due to a proline kink at 6.50 that bends the helix in toward the binding pocket and enables considerable motion in this region. The wider exposure of residues 6.55-6.60 to the binding-site crevice, combined with the divergent amino acid sequences, is consistent with the inferred role of residues in this region in determining ligand binding selectivity. The conservation of the accessibility pattern on the cytoplasmic side of 6.54 suggests that this region may be important for receptor activation. This accessibility pattern is similar to that of the D2 dopamine receptor, the only other GPCR in which TM6 has been mapped by SCAM. That opioid receptors and the remotely related D2 dopamine receptor have similar accessibility patterns in TM6 suggest that these segments of GPCRs in the rhodopsin-like subfamily not only share secondary structure but also are packed similarly into the transmembrane bundle and thus have similar tertiary structure.     

Structural insights into agonist-induced activation of G-protein-coupled receptors

Recent years have seen tremendous breakthroughs in structure determination of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In 2011, two agonist-bound active-state structures of rhodopsin have been published. Together with structures of several rhodopsin activation intermediates and a wealth of biochemical and spectroscopic information, they provide a unique structural framework on which to understand GPCR activation. Here we use this framework to compare the recent crystal structures of the agonist-bound active states of the β(2) adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR) and the A(2A) adenosine receptor (A(2A)AR). While activation of these three GPCRs results in rearrangements of TM5 and TM6, the extent of this conformational change varies considerably. Displacements of the cytoplasmic side of TM6 ranges between 3 and 8? depending on whether selective stabilizers of the active conformation are used (i.e. a G-protein peptide in the case of rhodopsin or a conformationally selective nanobody in the case of the β(2)AR) or not (A(2A)AR). The agonist-induced conformational changes in the ligand-binding pocket are largely receptor specific due to the different chemical nature of the agonists. However, several similarities can be observed, including a relocation of conserved residues W6.48 and F6.44 towards L5.51 and P5.50, and of I/L3.40 away from P5.50. This transmission switch links agonist binding to the movement of TM5 and TM6 through the rearrangement of the TM3-TM5-TM6 interface, and possibly constitutes a common theme of GPCR activation.     

Leu128(3.43) (l128) and val247(6.40) (v247) of CXCR1 are critical amino Acid residues for g protein coupling and receptor activation

CXCR1, a classic GPCR that binds IL-8, plays a key role in neutrophil activation and migration by activating phospholipase C (PLC)β through Gα(15) and Gα(i) which generates diacylglycerol and inositol phosphates (IPs). In this study, two conserved amino acid residues of CXCR1 on the transmembrane domain (TM) 3 and TM6, Leu128(3.43) (L128) and Val247(6.40) (V247), respectively, were selectively substituted with other amino acids to investigate the role of these conserved residues in CXCR1 activation. Although two selective mutants on Leu128, Leu128Ala (L128A) and Leu128Arg (L128R), demonstrated high binding affinity to IL-8, they were not capable of coupling to G proteins and consequently lost the functional response of the receptors. By contrast, among the four mutants at residue Val247 (TM6.40), replacing Val247 with Ala (V247A) and Asn (V247N) led to constitutive activation of mutant receptors when cotransfected with Gα(15). The V247N mutant also constitutively activated the Gα(i) protein. These results indicate that L128 on TM3.43 is involved in G protein coupling and receptor activation but is unimportant for ligand binding. On the other hand, V247 on TM6.40 plays a critical role in maintaining the receptor in the inactive state, and the substitution of V247 impaired the receptor constraint and stabilized an active conformation. Functionally, there was an increase in chemotaxis in response to IL-8 in cells expressing V247A and V247N. Our findings indicate that Leu128(3.43) and Val247(6.40) are critical for G protein coupling and activation of signaling effectors, providing a valuable insight into the mechanism of CXCR1 activation.     

Glucose and sucrose act as agonist and mannose as antagonist ligands of the G protein-coupled receptor Gpr1 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Several examples of G protein-coupled receptors have recently been suggested to respond to common sugars in millimolar concentrations. This low affinity has made it difficult to demonstrate direct receptor-ligand interaction. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, rapid activation of the cAMP pathway by glucose and sucrose requires the GPCR Gpr1. Our results obtained by cysteine scanning mutagenesis and SCAM (substituted cysteine accessibility method) of residues in TMD VI provide strong evidence that glucose and sucrose directly interact as ligands with Gpr1. The affinity for sucrose is much higher. Structurally similar sugars such as galactose, mannose, and fructose do not act as agonists, but mannose acts as an antagonist for both sucrose and glucose. These results support the idea that Gpr1 directly senses sugars and that sugars can effectively bind GPCRs with a low affinity in a binding pocket formed by the transmembrane domains. The ligand repertoire of GPCRs can thus be extended to common sugars in millimolar concentrations.     

Constitutive activation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor alters the spatial proximity of transmembrane 7 to the ligand-binding pocket

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors by agonists involves significant movement of transmembrane domains (TM) following binding of agonist. The underlying structural mechanism by which receptor activation takes place is largely unknown but can be inferred by detecting variability within the environment of the ligand-binding pocket, which constitutes a water-accessible crevice surrounded by the seven TM helices. Using the substituted cysteine accessibility method, we initially identified those residues within the seventh transmembrane domain (TM7) of wild type angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor that contribute to forming the binding site pocket. We have substituted successively TM7 residues ranging from Ile276 to Tyr302 to cysteine. Treatment of A277C, V280C, T282C, A283C, I286C, A291C, and F301C mutant receptors with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent MTSEA significantly inhibited ligand binding, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT1 receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was greatly reduced for TM7 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active mutant of the AT1 receptor. Our data suggest that upon activation, TM7 of the AT1 receptor goes through a pattern of helical movements that results in its distancing from the binding pocket per se. These studies support accumulating evidence whereby elements of TM7 of class A GPCRs promote activation of the receptor through structural rearrangements.     

Residues within transmembrane helices 2 and 5 of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor contribute to agonist and antagonist binding

To understand the ligand binding properties of the human GnRH receptor (hGnRH-R), 24 site-specific mutants within transmembrane helices (TMH) 1, 2, and 5 and the extracellular loop 2 (E2) were generated. These mutants were analyzed by using a functional reporter gene assay, monitoring receptor signaling via adenylate cyclase to a cAMP-responsive element fused to Photinus pyralis luciferase. The functional behavior of 14 receptor mutants, capable of G-protein coupling and signaling, was studied in detail with different well described agonistic and antagonistic peptide ligands. Furthermore, the binding constants were determined in displacement binding experiments with the antagonist [125I]Cetrorelix. The substitution of residues K36, Q204, W205, H207, Q208, F20, F213, F216, and S217 for alanine had no or only a marginal effect on ligand binding and signaling. In contrast, substitution of N87, Eg9, D9, R179, W206, Y211, F214, and T215 for alanine resulted in receptor proteins neither capable of ligand binding nor signal transduction. Within those mutants affecting ligand binding and signaling to various degrees, W101A, N102A, and N212Q differentiate between agonists and antagonists. Thus, in addition to N102 already described, the residues W101 in TMH2 and N212 in TMH5 are important for the architecture of the ligand-binding pocket. Based on the experimental data, three-dimensional models for binding of the superagonist D-Trp6-GnRH (Triptorelin) and the antagonist Cetrorelix to the hGnRH-R are proposed. Both decapeptidic ligands are bound to the receptor in a bent conformation with distinct interactions within the binding pocket formed by all TMHs, E2, and E3. The antagonist Cetrorelix with bulky hydrophobic N-terminal amino acids interacts with quite different receptor residues, a hint at the failure to induce an active, G protein-coupling receptor conformation.     

Molecular modeling, affinity labeling, and site-directed mutagenesis define the key points of interaction between the ligand-binding domain of the vitamin D nuclear receptor and 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3

We have combined molecular modeling and classical structure-function techniques to define the interactions between the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the vitamin D nuclear receptor (VDR) and its natural ligand, 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3)]. The affinity analogue 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3)-3-bromoacetate exclusively labeled Cys-288 in the VDR-LBD. Mutation of C288 to glycine abolished this affinity labeling, whereas the VDR-LBD mutants C337G and C369G (other conserved cysteines in the VDR-LBD) were labeled similarly to the wild-type protein. These results revealed that the A-ring 3-OH group docks next to C288 in the binding pocket. We further mutated M284 and W286 (separately creating M284A, M284S, W286A, and W286F) and caused severe loss of ligand binding, indicating the crucial role played by the contiguous segment between M284 and C288. Alignment of the VDR-LBD sequence with the sequences of nuclear receptor LBDs of known 3-D structure positioned M284 and W286 in the presumed beta-hairpin of the molecule, thereby identifying it as the region contacting the A-ring of 1alpha, 25-(OH)(2)D(3). From the multiple sequence alignment, we developed a homologous extension model of the VDR-LBD. The model has a canonical nuclear receptor fold with helices H1-H12 and a single beta hairpin but lacks the long insert (residues 161-221) between H2 and H3. We docked the alpha-conformation of the A-ring into the binding pocket first so as to incorporate the above-noted interacting residues. The model predicts hydrogen bonding contacts between ligand and protein at S237 and D299 as well as at the site of the natural mutation R274L. Mutation of S237 or D299 to alanine largely abolished ligand binding, whereas changing K302, a nonligand-contacting residue, to alanine left binding unaffected. In the "activation" helix 12, the model places V418 closest to the ligand, and, consistent with this prediction, the mutation V418S abolished ligand binding. The studies together have enabled us to identify 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3)-binding motifs in the ligand-binding pocket of VDR.     

Different residues in the GABA(A) receptor alpha 1T60-alpha 1K70 region mediate GABA and SR-95531 actions

Although gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonists and antagonists bind to a common site, they produce different conformational changes within the site because agonists cause channel opening and antagonists do not. We used the substituted cysteine accessibility method and two-electrode voltage clamping to identify residues within the binding pocket that are important for mediating these different actions. Each residue from alpha(1)T60 to alpha(1)K70 was mutated to cysteine and expressed with wild-type beta(2) subunits in Xenopus oocytes. Methanethiosulfonate reagents reacted with alpha(1)T60C, alpha(1)D62C, alpha(1)F64C, alpha(1)R66C, alpha(1)S68C, and alpha(1)K70C. gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) slowed methanethiosulfonate modification of alpha(1)F64C, alpha(1)R66C, and alpha(1)S68C, whereas SR-95531 slowed modification of alpha(1)D62C, alpha(1)F64C, and alpha(1)R66C, demonstrating that different residues are important for mediating GABA and SR-95531 actions. In addition, methanethiosulfonate reaction rates were fastest for alpha(1)F64C and alpha(1)R66C, indicating that these residues are located in an open, aqueous environment lining the core of the binding pocket. Positively charged methanethiosulfonate reagents derivatized alpha(1)F64C and alpha(1)R66C significantly faster than a negatively charged reagent, suggesting that a negative subsite important for interacting with the ammonium group of GABA exists within the binding pocket. Pentobarbital activation of the receptor increased the rate of methanethiosulfonate modification of alpha(1)D62C and alpha(1)S68C, demonstrating that parts of the binding site undergo structural rearrangements during channel gating.     

Molecular interactions of nonpeptide agonists and antagonists with the melanocortin-4 receptor

The melanocortin-4 (MC4) receptor is a potential therapeutic target for obesity and cachexia, for which nonpeptide agonists and antagonists are being developed, respectively. The aim of this study was to identify molecular interactions between the MC4 receptor and nonpeptide ligands, and to compare the mechanism of binding between agonist and antagonist ligands. Nonpeptide ligand interaction was affected by mutations that reduce peptide ligand binding (D122A, D126A, S190A, M200A, F261A, and F284A), confirming overlapping binding determinants for peptide and nonpeptide ligands. The common halogenated phenyl group of nonpeptide ligands was a determinant of F261A and F284A mutations' affinity-reducing effect, implying this group interacts with the aromatic side chains of these residues. All affected compounds contain this group, the mutations reduced binding of 2,4-dichloro-substituted compounds more than 4-chloro-substituted-compounds, and F284A mutation eliminated the affinity-enhancing effect of 2-chloro-substitution. F261A and F284A mutations reduced the affinity of antagonists more than agonists, suggesting that the stronger ligand interaction with these residues, the lower the ligand efficacy. Supporting this hypothesis, F261A mutation increased the efficacy of nonpeptide antagonist and partial agonist ligands. D122A and D126A mutations reduced nonpeptide ligand interaction. Removing the ligands' derivatized amide group eliminated the effect of the mutations. Interaction of agonists, which bear a common amine within this group, was strongly reduced by D126A mutation (550-3300-fold), suggesting an electrostatic interaction between the amine and the acidic group of D126. These postulated interactions with aromatic and acidic regions of the MC4 receptor are consistent with a molecular model of the receptor. Furthermore, the strength of interaction with the aromatic pocket, and potentially the acidic pocket, controls the signaling efficacy of the ligand.     

Cysteine scanning mutagenesis (residues Glu52-Gly96) of the human P2X1 receptor for ATP: mapping agonist binding and channel gating

P2X receptors are ATP-gated cation channels. The x-ray structure of a P2X4 receptor provided a major advance in understanding the molecular basis of receptor properties. However, how agonists are coordinated, the extent of the binding site, and the contribution of the vestibules in the extracellular domain to ionic permeation have not been addressed. We have used cysteine-scanning mutagenesis to determine the contribution of residues Glu(52)-Gly(96) to human P2X1 receptor properties. ATP potency was reduced for the mutants K68C, K70C, and F92C. The efficacy of the partial agonist BzATP was also reduced for several mutants forming the back of the proposed agonist binding site. Molecular docking in silico of both ATP and BzATP provided models of the agonist binding site consistent with these data. Individual cysteine mutants had no effect or slightly increased antagonism by suramin or pyridoxal-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulfonate. Mutants at the entrance to and lining the upper vestibule were unaffected by cysteine-reactive methanethiosulfonate (MTS) reagents, suggesting that it does not contribute to ionic permeation. Mutants that were sensitive to modification by MTS reagents were predominantly found either around the proposed ATP binding pocket or on the strands connecting the binding pocket to the transmembrane region and lining the central vestibule. In particular, ATP sensitivity and currents were increased by a positively charged MTS reagent at the G60C mutant at the interface between the central and extracellular vestibule. This suggests that dilation of the base of the central vestibule contributes to gating of the receptor.     

The structure of active opsin as a basis for identification of GPCR agonists by dynamic homology modelling and virtual screening assays

Most of the currently available G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) crystal structures represent an inactive receptor state, which has been considered to be suitable only for the discovery of antagonists and inverse agonists in structure-based computational ligand screening. Using the β(2)-adrenergic receptor (B2AR) as a model system, we show that a dynamic homology model based on an "active" opsin structure without further incorporation of experimental data performs better than the crystal structure of the inactive B2AR in finding agonists over antagonists/inverse agonists. Such "active-like state" dynamic homology models can therefore be used to selectively identify GPCR agonists in in silico ligand libraries.     

Crystal structure of the BARD1 BRCT domains

The interaction of the breast tumor suppressor BRCA1 with the protein BARD1 results in the formation of a heterodimeric complex that has ubiquitin ligase activity and plays central roles in cell cycle checkpoint control and DNA repair. Both BRCA1 and BARD1 possess a pair of tandem BRCT domains that interact in a phosphorylation-dependent manner with target proteins. We determined the crystal structure of the human BARD1 BRCT repeats (residues 568-777) at 1.9 A resolution. The composition and structure of the BARD1 phosphoserine-binding pocket P1 are strikingly similar to those of the BRCA1 and MDC1 BRCT domains, suggesting a similar mode of interaction with the phosphate group of the ligand. By contrast, the BARD1 BRCT selectivity pocket P2 exhibits distinct structural features, including two prominent histidine residues, His685 and His686, which may be important for ligand binding. The protonation state of these histidines has a marked effect on the calculated electrostatic potential in the vicinity of P2, raising the possibility that ligand recognition may be regulated by changes in pH. Importantly, the BARD1 BRCT structure provides insights into the mechanisms by which the cancer-associated missense mutations C645R, V695L, and S761N may adversely affect the structure and function of BARD1.     

Ligand based structural studies of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor.

The structural characterization of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is quite important as these proteins represent a vast number of therapeutic targets involved in drug discovery. However, solving the three-dimensional structure of GPCR has been a significant obstacle in structural biology. A variety of reasons, including their large molecular weight, intricate interhelical packing, as well as their membrane-associated topology, has hindered efforts aimed at their purification. In the absence of pure protein, available in the native conformation, classical methods of structural analysis such as X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy cannot be utilized successfully. Alternative methods must therefore be explored to facilitate the structural features involved in drug-receptor interactions. The methods described herein detail the use of covalent probes, or affinity labels, capable of binding covalently to a target GPCR at its binding site(s). Our approach involves the incorporation of a number of reactive moieties in different regions of the ligand molecule each of which is expected to react with different amino acid residues. Information obtained from such work coupled with computer modeling and validated by the use of site-directed mutagenesis of GPCRs allows for three-dimensional mapping of the receptor binding site. It also sheds light on the different possible binding motifs for the various classes of agonists and antagonists and identifies amino acid residues involved with GPCR activation or inactivation.     

Structural mobility of the extracellular ligand-binding core of an ionotropic glutamate receptor. Analysis of NMR relaxation dynamics

Ionotropic glutamate receptors play important roles in a variety of neuronal processes and have been implicated in multiple neurodegenerative diseases. The extracellular ligand-binding (S1S2) core of the GluR2 subtype can be expressed in bacteria as a soluble, monomeric protein with binding properties essentially identical to those of the intact receptor. The crystal structure of this protein has been determined in the presence and absence of various agonists and antagonists [Armstrong, N., Sun, Y., Chen, G. Q., and Gouaux, E. (1998) Nature 395, 913-917; Armstrong, N., and Gouaux, E. (2000) Neuron 28, 165-181]. The protein consists of two lobes, with the S1 segment composing the majority of lobe 1 and the S2 segment composing most of lobe 2. A domain closure upon ligand binding has been postulated, but details of intradomain motions have not been investigated. In this paper, the backbone motions of the ligand-binding core of GluR2 bound to glutamate were studied using (15)N longitudinal (T1) and transverse (T2) relaxation measurements as well as [1H]-15N nuclear Overhauser effects at 500 and 600 MHz. Residues in the agonist-binding pocket exhibited two main classes of motion. Those contacting the alpha-substituents of the ligand glutamate exhibited minimal internal motion, while those contacting the gamma-constituents exhibited exchange dynamics, indicating two dynamically distinct portions of the binding pocket. Also, two residues in transdomain linkers between lobes 1 and 2 show exchange, lending new insight into the previously proposed domain closure hypothesis. Finally, concerted motion of helix F suggests a pathway for ligand dissociation without the necessity of domain reopening.     

P3 optimization of functional potency, in vivo efficacy and oral bioavailability in 3-aminopyrazinone thrombin inhibitors bearing non-charged groups at the P1 position

Although the S3 pocket of the thrombin active site is lined with lipophilic amino acid residues, the accommodation of polarity within the lipophilic P3 moiety of small molecule inhibitors is possible provided that the polar functionality is capable of pointing away from the binding pocket outwards toward solvent while simultaneously allowing the lipophilic portion of the P3 ligand to interact with the S3 amino acid residues. Manipulation of this motif provided the means to effect optimization of functional potency, in vivo antithrombotic efficacy and oral bioavailability in a series of 3-aminopyrazinone thrombin inhibitors which contained non-charged groups at the P1 position.     

Structural elements of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor conferring subtype selectivity for benzodiazepine site ligands

gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors comprise a subfamily of ligand-gated ion channels whose activity can be modulated by ligands acting at the benzodiazepine binding site on the receptor. The benzodiazepine binding site was characterized using a site-directed mutagenesis strategy in which amino acids of the alpha5 subunit were substituted by their corresponding alpha1 residues. Given the high affinity and selectivity of alpha1-containing compared with alpha5-containing GABAA receptors for zolpidem, mutated alpha5 subunits were co-expressed with beta2 and gamma2 subunits, and the affinity of recombinant receptors for zolpidem was measured. One alpha5 mutant (bearing P162T, E200G, and T204S) exhibited properties similar to that of the alpha1 subunit, notably high affinity zolpidem binding and potentiation by zolpidem of GABA-induced chloride current. Two of these mutations, alpha5P162T and alpha5E200G, might alter binding pocket conformation, whereas alpha5T204S probably permits formation of a hydrogen bond with a proton acceptor in zolpidem. These three amino acid substitutions also influenced receptor affinity for CL218872. Our data thus suggest that corresponding amino acids of the alpha1 subunit, particularly alpha1-Ser204, are the crucial residues influencing ligand selectivity at the binding pocket of alpha1-containing receptors, and a model of this binding pocket is presented.