Comparison of areas of quinacrine mustard fluorescence and modified Giemsa staining in human metaphase chromosomes

The methods of quinacrine mustard fluorescence and modified Giemsa staining were compared in view of the structural details revealed in human mitotic chromosomes derived from the peripheral blood of normal healthy humans. Over the chromatids both techniques produced a crossbanding pattern where larger segments of heavy staining in the latter technique and the fluorescing bands in the former occurred at similar locations. The centromeric heterochromatin, intensely stained with Giemsa was, however, negative in fluorescence, except for chromosome no. 3 and less often no. 6. The regularly occurring secondary constrictions in chromosomes 1, 9, and 16 behaved generally like areas of centromeric heterochromatin. The area of secondary constriction in the Y chromosome as also that of chromosome 9 in the ASG modification of the Giemsa technique was both non-fluorescent and non-staining.     

Differential fluorescent staining of Drosophila chromosomes with quinacrine mustard

The polytene and mitotic chromosomes of D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. ananassae, and D. virilis were stained with the fluorescent dye, quinacrine mustard (QM). In all these species except D. ananassae, we have detected species-specific chromosomal loci which exhibit an extremely brilliant fluorescence. Most, but not all, of the brilliantly fluorescing areas are located in heterochromatic chromosome regions. Cytochemical and chemical methods have been employed to demonstrate that the brilliant fluorescence represents regions of acid labile non-covalent binding between DNA and QM whereas the moderate overall fluorescence is primarily due to covalent bonding (by alkylation) of the QM to DNA. The exact mode of binding of QM in the brilliant areas and the nature of the DNA in these areas are not known. The possible biological significance of the DNA in the brilliant regions is discussed.This study was supported by a Research Grant (GM 10499) from the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service.This paper is dedicated with respect and affection to Professor Berwind P. Kaufmann on the occasion of his 74th birthday, April 23, 1971.     

Mechanisms of quinacrine binding and fluorescence in nuclei and chromosomes

Summary The mechanism has been investigated whereby quinacrine binds to the DNA of nuclei and chromosomes in cytological preparations fixed in methanol-acetic acid. A variety of evidence is consistent with the idea that the quinacrine binds by intercalation. This is supported by a high value for the affinity of quinacrine for DNA, together with a saturation value of 0.2 quinacrine molecules/nucleotide; binding in the presence of strong salt solutions; and inhibition of fluorescence and banding by denaturation or depurination of DNA. At high quinacrine concentrations, weak binding of quinacrine to nuclei and chromosomes also occurs, but this is not relevant to the production of strong fluorescence or Q-banding patterns.A number of factors were tested which might have affected quinacrine fluorescence and banding. These included: pH; blocking protein amino groups by acetylation or benzoylation; introduction of hydrophobic groups by benzoylation; and dephosphorylation. All these treatments were without effect. However, comparison of the quinacrine fluorescence of human and onion nuclei, which differ substantially in the base composition of their DNa, shows that quinacrine fluorescence can be enhanced in cytological preparations by AT-rich DNA.In honour of Prof. P. van Duijn     

Mechanisms of quinacrine binding and fluorescence in nuclei and chromosomes

The mechanisms has been investigated whereby quinacrine binds to the DNA of nuclei and chromosomes in cytological preparations fixed in methanol-acetic acid. A variety of evidence is consistent with the idea that the quinacrine binds by intercalation. This is supported by a high value for the affinity of quinacrine for DNA, together with a saturation value of 0.2 quinacrine molecules/nucleotide; binding in the presence of strong salt solutions; and inhibition of fluorescence and banding by denaturation or depurination of DNA. At high quinacrine concentrations, weak binding of quinacrine to nuclei and chromosomes also occurs, but this is not relevant to the production of strong fluorescence or Q-banding patterns. A number of factors were tested which might have affected quinacrine fluorescence and banding. These included: pH; blocking protein amino groups by acetylation or benzoylation; introduction of hydrophobic groups by benzoylation; and dephosphorylation. All these treatments were without effect. However, comparison of the quinacrine fluorescence of human and onion nuclei, which differ substantially in the base composition of their DNA, shows that quinacrine fluorescence can be enhanced in cytological preparations by AT-rich DNA.     

Interactions of chlorophyllin with acridine orange,quinacrine mustard and doxorubicin analyzed by light absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy

The present study was designed to estimate the ability of chlorophyllin (CHL) to interact with two acridine mutagens, quinacrine mustard (QM) and acridine orange (AO), and with the antitumor anthracycline doxorubicin (Dox). To this end, aqueous solutions of QM, AO or Dox during titration with CHL were subjected to spectrophotometry and spectrofluorimetry to detect possible interactions between these reagents. The data indicate that CHL forms complexes with AO, QM or Dox in these solutions. The presence of the complexes was manifested by a bathochromic shift of the absorption spectra, as well as by strong quenching of the fluorescence of each of these mutagens in the presence of CHL. CHL, thus, may serve as an interceptor of these mutagenic acridines in different in vivo or in vitro applications. Its ability to interact with Dox may potentially be utilized to detoxify patients overdosed with this or similar drugs.     

CCD microscopy and image analysis of cells and chromosomes stained by fluorescence in situ hybridization

Summary This paper reviews methods and applications of CCD microscopy for analysing cells and chromosomes subjected to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The current status of indirect and direct FISH staining methods with respect to probe labelling, detection sensitivity, multiplicity and DNA resolution is summarized. Microscope hardware, including special multi-band pass filters and CCD cameras required for FISH analysis, is described. Then follows a detailed discussion of current and emerging applications such as the automated enumeration of chromosomal abnormalities (counting of dots in interphase cells), comparative genomic hybridization, automated evaluation of radiation-induced chromosomal translocations, and high-resolution DNA mapping on highly extended chromatin. Finally, the limitations of the present methodology and future prospects are discussed.The Historical Journal lecture for 1993 presented by Dr Tanke to a joint meeting of the Royal Microscopical society of cell Biology, Clinical Cytology, Electron Microscopy and Pathology and the Belgian Socities in Brussels, Belgium on 2 September 1993.This work was supported financially by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) and in part by Imagenetics, Framingham, MA, USA.     

Identification of Chinese hamster chromosome bivalents at diakinesis by quinacrine mustard fluorescence

The eleven chromosome bivalents of the Chinese hamster at diakinesis can be identified on account of their morphology, in combination with the fluorescence pattern. Comparison of the fluorescence pattern of the sex-chromosomes in both mitosis and meiosis shows that the distal part of the short arm of the X chromosome is homologous with part of the Y chromosome. It is not possible, however, to decide with certainty which part of the Y chromosome is involved.     

The possibility to distinguish chromosomes of Petunia hybrida by quinacrine fluorescence

A karyotype analysis of a diploid inbred line of Petunia hybrida stained with aceto-orcein is given. Five of the seven pairs of chromosomes can be identified by their relative lengths and arm ratios. The two remaining pairs stained with quinacrine show different fluorescence patterns.     

Spatial relations of human chromosomes identified by quinacrine fluorescence at metaphase

Summary Data on centromere locations from 168 fully identified normal human complements were subjected to special analyses of variance by computer. Aggregation specifically attributable to homologue associations seemed definitely to be absent. Chromosomes 1, 9 and 16, which contain large heterochromatic blocks were distributed as typical non-acrocentrics. X chromosomes in female cells behaved much like other chromosomes of their size, but may have an atypically large homologue distance. Acrocentrics aggregate as a group without specific homologue associations; smaller chromosomes in the group are often nearer the center of the metaphase plate. The data do not suggest stronger acrocentric association in females than males.

---

Zusammenfassung Daten über die Zentromerlokalisation von 168 vollständig identifizierten normalen menschlichen Metaphaseplatten wurden einer speziellen Varianzanalyse unterworfen. Irgendeine Aggregation, die etwa auf eine Assoziation homologer Chromosomen hätte zurückgeführt werden können, fehlte eindeutig. Die Chromosomen 1, 9 und 16, die große heterosomen bei Frauen verhielten sich wie andere Chromosomen der gleichen Größenklasse; die Homologen sind aber etwas weiter voneinander entfernt. Akrozentrische liegen als Gruppe zusammen ohne spezifische Assoziation zwischen Homologen. Kleinere Chromosomen der Gruppe finden sich oft näher dem Zentrum der Metaphaseplatte. Es finden sich keine Hinweise für eine stärkere Assoziation der Akrozentrischen bei Frauen im Vergleich zu Männern.

     

Sequential staining with Hoechst 33258 and quinacrine mustard for the identification of human chromosomes in somatic cell hybrids

We have analysed metaphase chromosomes of man-mouse somatic cell hybrids using a sequential staining procedure involving the fluorescent DNA-binding stains, Hoechst 33258 and quinacrine mustard. This was found to be a simple and reliable means of differentiating the chromosomes of the two species and of identifying specific human chromosomes. In addition, this method will permit the study of the segregation of human chromosome homologues that are discordant for quinacrine mustard fluorescent polymorphisms.     

The identification of human chromosomes by quinacrine fluorescence after hybridisation in situ

Summary A method is described for producing fluorescent bands on human chromosomes by staining with quinacrine after hybridisation in situ. The advantages of the method include the elimination of artefacts arising from staining before hybridisation, the fact that there is no reduction in sample number between staining and autoradiography, the ease with which autoradiographic grains can be identified and counted, and the reduction in exposure time.Offprint requests to: S.S. Lawrie     

Simultaneous staining of sister chromatid exchanges and Q-bands in human chromosomes after treatment with methyl methane sulphonate,quinacrine mustard,and quinacrine

Summary Human peripheral lymphocyte chromosomes were stained simultaneously for sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) and Q-banding. No effect of treatment with MMS, QM, and Q on the distribution of SCEs in chromosomes was found compared with controls. The SCEs were distributed between chromosomes roughly according to metaphase length, with the shorter chromosomes underrepresented. The majority of SCEs were located to pale bands, while a few occurred in bright bands and at interfaces between pale and bright bands. A greater frequency than expected of SCEs had occurred at identical sites in homologous chromosomes. This frequency was significantly increased after treatment with MMS.