共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Zhenqiang Su Hong Fang Huixiao Hong Leming Shi Wenqian Zhang Wenwei Zhang Yanyan Zhang Zirui Dong Lee J Lancashire Marina Bessarabova Xi Yang Baitang Ning Binsheng Gong Joe Meehan Joshua Xu Weigong Ge Roger Perkins Matthias Fischer Weida Tong 《Genome biology》2014,15(12)
Background
Gene expression microarray has been the primary biomarker platform ubiquitously applied in biomedical research, resulting in enormous data, predictive models, and biomarkers accrued. Recently, RNA-seq has looked likely to replace microarrays, but there will be a period where both technologies co-exist. This raises two important questions: Can microarray-based models and biomarkers be directly applied to RNA-seq data? Can future RNA-seq-based predictive models and biomarkers be applied to microarray data to leverage past investment?Results
We systematically evaluated the transferability of predictive models and signature genes between microarray and RNA-seq using two large clinical data sets. The complexity of cross-platform sequence correspondence was considered in the analysis and examined using three human and two rat data sets, and three levels of mapping complexity were revealed. Three algorithms representing different modeling complexity were applied to the three levels of mappings for each of the eight binary endpoints and Cox regression was used to model survival times with expression data. In total, 240,096 predictive models were examined.Conclusions
Signature genes of predictive models are reciprocally transferable between microarray and RNA-seq data for model development, and microarray-based models can accurately predict RNA-seq-profiled samples; while RNA-seq-based models are less accurate in predicting microarray-profiled samples and are affected both by the choice of modeling algorithm and the gene mapping complexity. The results suggest continued usefulness of legacy microarray data and established microarray biomarkers and predictive models in the forthcoming RNA-seq era.Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0523-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. 相似文献7.
8.
9.
Background
Gene expression profiling using microarrays is a powerful technology widely used to study regulatory networks. Profiling of mRNA levels in mutant organisms has the potential to identify genes regulated by the mutated protein.Methodology/Principle Findings
Using tissues from multiple lines of knockout mice we have examined genome-wide changes in gene expression. We report that a significant proportion of changed genes were found near the targeted gene.Conclusions/Significance
The apparent clustering of these genes was explained by the presence of flanking DNA from the parental ES cell. We provide recommendations for the analysis and reporting of microarray data from knockout mice 相似文献10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Anto P. Rajkumar Per Qvist Ross Lazarus Francesco Lescai Jia Ju Mette Nyegaard Ole Mors Anders D. B?rglum Qibin Li Jane H. Christensen 《BMC genomics》2015,16(1)
Background
Massively parallel cDNA sequencing (RNA-seq) experiments are gradually superseding microarrays in quantitative gene expression profiling. However, many biologists are uncertain about the choice of differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis methods and the validity of cost-saving sample pooling strategies for their RNA-seq experiments. Hence, we performed experimental validation of DEGs identified by Cuffdiff2, edgeR, DESeq2 and Two-stage Poisson Model (TSPM) in a RNA-seq experiment involving mice amygdalae micro-punches, using high-throughput qPCR on independent biological replicate samples. Moreover, we sequenced RNA-pools and compared their results with sequencing corresponding individual RNA samples.Results
False-positivity rate of Cuffdiff2 and false-negativity rates of DESeq2 and TSPM were high. Among the four investigated DEG analysis methods, sensitivity and specificity of edgeR was relatively high. We documented the pooling bias and that the DEGs identified in pooled samples suffered low positive predictive values.Conclusions
Our results highlighted the need for combined use of more sensitive DEG analysis methods and high-throughput validation of identified DEGs in future RNA-seq experiments. They indicated limited utility of sample pooling strategies for RNA-seq in similar setups and supported increasing the number of biological replicate samples.Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1767-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. 相似文献20.