Centrioles generate a local pulse of Polo/PLK1 activity to initiate mitotic centrosome assembly

Mitotic centrosomes are formed when centrioles start to recruit large amounts of pericentriolar material (PCM) around themselves in preparation for mitosis. This centrosome “maturation” requires the centrioles and also Polo/PLK1 protein kinase. The PCM comprises several hundred proteins and, in Drosophila, Polo cooperates with the conserved centrosome proteins Spd‐2/CEP192 and Cnn/CDK5RAP2 to assemble a PCM scaffold around the mother centriole that then recruits other PCM client proteins. We show here that in Drosophila syncytial blastoderm embryos, centrosomal Polo levels rise and fall during the assembly process—peaking, and then starting to decline, even as levels of the PCM scaffold continue to rise and plateau. Experiments and mathematical modelling indicate that a centriolar pulse of Polo activity, potentially generated by the interaction between Polo and its centriole receptor Ana1 (CEP295 in humans), could explain these unexpected scaffold assembly dynamics. We propose that centrioles generate a local pulse of Polo activity prior to mitotic entry to initiate centrosome maturation, explaining why centrioles and Polo/PLK1 are normally essential for this process.     

Distinct mechanisms eliminate mother and daughter centrioles in meiosis of starfish oocytes

Centriole elimination is an essential process that occurs in female meiosis of metazoa to reset centriole number in the zygote at fertilization. How centrioles are eliminated remains poorly understood. Here we visualize the entire elimination process live in starfish oocytes. Using specific fluorescent markers, we demonstrate that the two older, mother centrioles are selectively removed from the oocyte by extrusion into polar bodies. We show that this requires specific positioning of the second meiotic spindle, achieved by dynein-driven transport, and anchorage of the mother centriole to the plasma membrane via mother-specific appendages. In contrast, the single daughter centriole remaining in the egg is eliminated before the first embryonic cleavage. We demonstrate that these distinct elimination mechanisms are necessary because if mother centrioles are artificially retained, they cannot be inactivated, resulting in multipolar zygotic spindles. Thus, our findings reveal a dual mechanism to eliminate centrioles: mothers are physically removed, whereas daughters are eliminated in the cytoplasm, preparing the egg for fertilization.     

Mother centrioles are kicked out so that starfish zygote can grow

Most oocytes eliminate their centrioles during meiotic divisions through unclear mechanisms. In this issue, Borrego-Pinto et al. (2016. J Cell. Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201510083) show that mother centrioles need to be eliminated from starfish oocytes by extrusion into the polar bodies for successful embryo development.Canonical centrosomes contain a pair of centrioles, often made of nine triplets of microtubules and surrounded by the pericentriolar material (PCM). They are the major microtubule organizing centers in most cells, which organize the microtubule spindle required to segregate chromosomes during cell division. Yet, most oocytes get rid of their centrioles. The biological significance of oocyte centriole riddance remains a mystery. Removing centrioles in oocytes could prevent some species, like Xenopus, from undergoing parthenogenetic development (Tournier et al., 1991). Also, eliminating the maternal centrioles is required to prevent the zygote from having an abnormal number of centrioles after fertilization, as sperm contribute two centrioles (motile sperm cells require centriole-based flagellar assembly and must retain their centrioles until fertilization [Manandhar et al., 2005]). In Drosophila, Xenopus, nematode, mouse, and human oocytes, egg centrioles are eliminated during meiotic prophase before oocyte asymmetric divisions (Szollosi et al., 1972; Manandhar et al., 2005; Januschke et al., 2006). Apart from the involvement of a helicase of undefined substrates, the pathway leading to centriole elimination has not been identified (Mikeladze-Dvali et al., 2012).In contrast, starfish oocytes, like sea urchin or mollusk, eliminate their centrioles later in meiotic divisions (Nakashima and Kato, 2001; Shirato et al., 2006). Centrioles are replicated in a semiconservative manner during the S phase of the cell cycle. The old centriole, named the mother, is characterized by the presence of distal and subdistal appendages and serves as a template for the assembly of a new daughter centriole, lacking appendages (Bornens and Gönczy, 2014). However, to become haploid, oocytes undergo two consecutive divisions with no intervening DNA replication. Hence, centrioles are not duplicated between the two meiotic divisions and oocytes keep their number of centrioles limited to four. This also means that starfish oocytes assemble their first meiotic spindle in the presence of a pair of centrioles at each pole (Fig. 1 A). Out of the four centrioles contained in the oocyte, two (one mother and one daughter centriole) are extruded into the first polar body during the first asymmetric division. Subsequently, the second meiotic spindle is formed with only one centriole per pole (Fig. 1 A), and one centriole is extruded in the second polar body. Previous work suggested that the poles of the second meiotic spindle in starfish are not functionally equivalent (Uetake et al., 2002). In this issue, Borrego-Pinto et al. find that the mother centriole retains the ability to nucleate asters but is specifically guided into the second polar body for extrusion, whereas the daughter centriole is inactivated and then eliminated within the oocyte.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Centriole elimination during meiotic maturation of starfish oocytes. (A) Scheme of starfish oocyte meiotic divisions and early egg development. Oocyte divisions are asymmetric in size; meiotic spindles are off-centered in these large cells; and daughter cells are tiny, tailored to the chromatin mass, and named polar bodies. Microtubules are green, DNA is pink, maternal centrosomes are yellow, and sperm centrosomes are orange. (B) Fate of mother and daughter centrioles during meiotic divisions. Centrosomes are artificially enlarged to emphasize the centrioles. PB1 and PB2, first and second polar body, respectively. During anaphase I, the DNA and centrioles are segregated; one set of chromosomes and one pair of centrioles are extruded into PB1 during anaphase I. The remaining mother centriole separates from its paired daughter and rapidly moves toward the plasma membrane, where it is extruded in the second polar body (PB2) during anaphase II, leaving one set of oocyte chromatids to combine with the sperm chromatids. The remaining oocyte daughter centriole is inactivated and degraded after anaphase II. Therefore, only the sperm centrioles form the first mitotic spindle in the fertilized oocyte. Oocytes forced to retain a mother centriole form a tripolar aster upon fertilization, which stops development.To investigate the mechanism of centriole elimination in the starfish Patiria miniata, Borrego-Pinto et al. (2016) first isolated homologues of centrosomal proteins and constructed fluorescent protein fusions to several centriolar proteins to track centriole fate in 3D time-lapse imaging during oocyte asymmetric divisions. Using specific markers of mother versus daughter centrioles, they established that, in meiosis I, the two spindle poles are equivalent, being constituted of a pair of mother and daughter centrioles. At anaphase I, one pair of mother/daughter centrioles is extruded into the first polar body. Importantly, the authors described an asymmetry in metaphase II, with the second meiotic spindle always having the mother centriole facing the cortex and the daughter centriole deep inside the cytoplasm (Fig. 1 B).Borrego-Pinto et al. (2016) went on to identify the origin of this asymmetry. They show that the mother centriole, but not the daughter one, starts being rapidly transported toward the plasma membrane before completion of meiosis I spindle disassembly in a microtubule- and dynein-dependent manner, as its trafficking could be impaired by the dynein inhibitor ciliobrevin D (Firestone et al., 2012). In a second step, the mother centriole is anchored to the plasma membrane through the second meiotic division. Interestingly, electron microscopy of starfish oocytes revealed electron-dense material as well as vesicles between the mother centriole and the plasma membrane, suggesting that the mother centriole’s plasma membrane anchorage occurs via its appendages (Reiter et al., 2012; Stinchcombe et al., 2015). Whether the mother centriole migrates to the cortex with its appendages facing or opposite the plasma membrane has not been addressed. However, it is reasonable to assume that, in a viscous environment such as the oocyte cytoplasm, a motion with the appendages up would be favored (Fig. 1 B). Moreover, whereas the migration of the mother centriole to the plasma membrane requires microtubules, its anchoring does not depend on microtubules or microfilaments, as shown by the continued tight association between the centriole and the membrane in the presence of microtubule- and/or actin-depolymerizing agents. This close anchoring via the centriole’s appendages is reminiscent of the anchoring of centrioles forming cilia or at the immunological synapse in T cells (Stinchcombe et al., 2015). The precise mechanisms involved in mother centriole anchoring to the plasma membrane in starfish might be conserved in other systems that also require proximity between these two structures. It would be interesting to assess whether astral microtubules emanating from the mother centriole progressively depolymerize as the mother centriole approaches the plasma membrane to allow the intimate anchoring of the appendages with the plasma membrane. If so, Katanin, a microtubule-severing enzyme whose activity is regulated during meiotic divisions in the nematode oocyte, would be a good candidate to promote such a progressive destabilization (Srayko et al., 2000).Future work will tell us why the daughter centriole does not experience such a migration event. This strongly argues for a functional asymmetry between the two types of centrioles. From the work of Borrego-Pinto et al. (2016), it appears that the daughter centriole is passively pushed inside the oocyte cytoplasm as a result of meiosis II spindle assembly and elongation. Dynein, which controls the migration of the mother centriole, could specifically associate with this centriole, like it does in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, by localizing preferentially to the spindle pole body (the yeast equivalent of the centrosome) facing the bud (Grava et al., 2006). Centrosome asymmetry has been described in several stem cell types (Roubinet and Cabernard, 2014) and this asymmetry is often rooted in its activity. However, Borrego-Pinto et al. (2016) show that the microtubule nucleation capacity of the daughter and mother centrioles is equivalent up to the metaphase II stage. It is only after fertilization and anaphase II that a difference in activity is detected between the mother and daughter centrioles. Thus, what underlies the asymmetry in behavior between the mother and daughter centrioles at anaphase I remains to be discovered. One possibility is that the presence of appendages in the mother centriole allows the recruitment of specific factors, such as dynein, which in turn regulate mother centriole migration and anchoring.Borrego-Pinto et al. (2016) also discovered that specific anchoring of the mother centriole to the plasma membrane, at which the second polar body will form, is the mechanism by which oocytes get rid of the remaining mother centriole. Importantly, actively removing the mother centriole after anaphase II is essential for zygotic development. Indeed, the researchers used the actin polymerization inhibitor cytochalasin D to prevent extrusion of the second polar body and artificially retain the mother centriole in the oocyte after anaphase II. When a mother centriole is retained, it keeps its microtubule nucleation capacity and participates in the first mitotic spindle pole organization of the fertilized egg, whereas the daughter centriole is inactivated and dismantled after anaphase II. As a consequence, because of the two centrioles contributed by the sperm cell, the mitotic spindle ends up being tripolar in the presence of an additional mother centriole, precluding correct chromosome segregation and further development (Fig. 1 B).The origin of the difference in behavior between mother and daughter centrioles after anaphase II will require further investigation. To explain the loss in nucleation capacity of the daughter centriole, it will be important to check for the presence of various PCM components. Indeed, it is reasonable to assume that the daughter centriole loses its PCM association. PCM size scales with centriole size; thus, appendages of the mother centriole might possess an innate ability to maintain association with the PCM (Bobinnec et al., 1998; Delattre et al., 2004). A possible cell cycle–dependent enzymatic activity appearing after anaphase II might explain the rapid loss in microtubule nucleation capacity of the daughter centriole. It is surprising that the starfish zygote cannot cluster the mother centriole material with the centrioles from the sperm, unlike mouse oocytes, which, like cancer cells, are able to cluster PCM to regulate the total number of microtubule organizing centers (Kwon et al., 2008; Breuer et al., 2010). It will be interesting to determine whether starfish zygotes express proteins such as HURP or HSET, which are major players in extra-centrosome clustering (Kwon et al., 2008; Breuer et al., 2010).Altogether, the results from Borrego-Pinto et al. (2016) address a major unresolved question: why do oocytes lose or inactivate their canonical centrioles during female meiosis? They show for the first time that maternal centrioles must be extruded from or inactivated in the starfish egg before fertilization so that they do not perturb mitotic spindle assembly. This is a very important step in our understanding of female gamete formation. Moreover, this work establishes starfish oocyte meiosis as a novel model system to study both functional and structural centrosome asymmetry, an essential component of asymmetric divisions.     

Analysis of centriole elimination during C. elegans oogenesis

Centrosomes are the principal microtubule organizing centers (MTOCs) of animal cells and comprise a pair of centrioles surrounded by pericentriolar material (PCM). Centriole number must be carefully regulated, notably to ensure bipolar spindle formation and thus faithful chromosome segregation. In the germ line of most metazoan species, centrioles are maintained during spermatogenesis, but eliminated during oogenesis. Such differential behavior ensures that the appropriate number of centrioles is present in the newly fertilized zygote. Despite being a fundamental feature of sexual reproduction in metazoans, the mechanisms governing centriole elimination during oogenesis are poorly understood. Here, we investigate this question in C. elegans. Using antibodies directed against centriolar components and serial-section electron microscopy, we establish that centrioles are eliminated during the diplotene stage of the meiotic cell cycle. Moreover, we show that centriole elimination is delayed upon depletion of the helicase CGH-1. We also find that somatic cells make a minor contribution to this process, and demonstrate that the germ cell karyotype is important for timely centriole elimination. These findings set the stage for a mechanistic dissection of centriole elimination in a metazoan organism.     

Destruction of maternal centrioles during fertilization of the brown alga, Scytosiphon lomentaria (Scytosiphonales, Phaeophyceae)

In brown algal fertilization, a pair of centrioles is derived from the male gamete, irrespective of the sexual reproduction pattern, i.e., isogamy, anisogamy, or oogamy. In this study, the manner in which the maternal centriole structure is destroyed in early zygotes of the isogamous brown alga Scytosiphon lomentaria was examined by electron microscopy. At fertilization, the zygote had two pairs of centrioles (flagellar basal bodies) derived from motile male and female gametes, and there was no morphological difference between the two pairs. The flagellar basal plate and the axonemal microtubules were still connected with the distal end of centrioles. Ultrastructural observations showed that the integrity of maternal-derived centrioles began to degenerate even in the 1-h-old zygote. At that time, the cylinder of triplet microtubules of the maternal centrioles became shorter from the distal end, and a section passing through the centrioles indicated that a part of the nine triplets of microtubules changed into doublet or singlet microtubules by degeneration of B and/or C tubules. In 2-h-old zygote, there was no trace of maternal centrioles ultrastructurally, and only the paternal centrioles remained. Further, reduction of centrin accompanying destruction of the maternal centrioles was examined in immunofluorescence microscopy. Centrin localized at the paternal and the maternal centrioles had the same fluorescence intensity in the early zygotes. At 4-6 h after fertilization, two spots indicating centrin localization showed different fluorescence intensity. Later, the weaker spot disappeared completely. These results showed that there is a difference in time between the destruction of the centriolar cylinders and the reduction of centrin molecules around them.     

Structured illumination of the interface between centriole and peri-centriolar material

The increase in centrosome size in mitosis was described over a century ago, and yet it is poorly understood how centrioles, which lie at the core of centrosomes, organize the pericentriolar material (PCM) in this process. Now, structured illumination microscopy reveals in Drosophila that, before clouds of PCM appear, its proteins are closely associated with interphase centrioles in two tube-like layers: an inner layer occupied by centriolar microtubules, Sas-4, Spd-2 and Polo kinase; and an outer layer comprising Pericentrin-like protein (Dplp), Asterless (Asl) and Plk4 kinase. Centrosomin (Cnn) and γ-tubulin associate with this outer tube in G2 cells and, upon mitotic entry, Polo activity is required to recruit them together with Spd-2 into PCM clouds. Cnn is required for Spd-2 to expand into the PCM during this maturation process but can itself contribute to PCM independently of Spd-2. By contrast, the centrioles of spermatocytes elongate from a pre-existing proximal unit during the G2 preceding meiosis. Sas-4 is restricted to the microtubule-associated, inner cylinder and Dplp and Cnn to the outer cylinder of this proximal part. γ-Tubulin and Asl associate with the outer cylinder and Spd-2 with the inner cylinder throughout the entire G2 centriole. Although they occupy different spatial compartments on the G2 centriole, Cnn, Spd-2 and γ-tubulin become diminished at the centriole upon entry into meiosis to become part of PCM clouds.     

A Proximal Centriole-Like Structure Is Present in Drosophila Spermatids and Can Serve as a Model to Study Centriole Duplication

Most animals have two centrioles in spermatids (the distal and proximal centrioles), but insect spermatids seem to contain only one centriole (Fuller 1993), which functionally resembles the distal centriole. Using fluorescent centriolar markers, we identified a structure near the fly distal centriole that is reminiscent of a proximal centriole (i.e., proximal centriole-like, or PCL). We show that the PCL exhibits several features of daughter centrioles. First, a single PCL forms near the proximal segment of the older centriole. Second, the centriolar proteins SAS-6, Ana1, and Bld10p/Cep135 are in the PCL. Third, PCL formation depends on SAK/PLK4 and SAS-6. Using a genetic screen for PCL defect, we identified a mutation in the gene encoding the conserved centriolar protein POC1, which is part of the daughter centriole initiation site (Kilburn et al. 2007) in Tetrahymena. We conclude that the PCL resembles an early intermediate structure of a forming centriole, which may explain why no typical centriolar structure is observed under electron microscopy. We propose that, during the evolution of insects, the proximal centriole was simplified by eliminating the later steps in centriole assembly. The PCL may provide a unique model to study early steps of centriole formation.THE centriole is a cylindrical structure rich in microtubules, which are organized in a ninefold symmetry. As the template of the ciliary axoneme, the centriole transmits its symmetry to the cilium. Dividing cells contain two centrosomes at the cell poles, each containing a pair of centrioles (mother and daughter centrioles) surrounded by a thick layer of pericentriolar material (PCM). Upon differentiation, the mother centriole of each pair becomes a basal body, which acts as a template for the cilium (Azimzadeh and Bornens 2007). The function of the daughter centriole is less clear. For example, in animal spermatids, the mother centriole, known as the distal centriole, becomes a basal body and gives rise to the sperm flagellum (Krioutchkova and Onishchenko 1999; Sathananthan et al. 2001). The daughter centriole in spermatids, known as the proximal centriole, is attached to the nucleus.Unlike other animal groups, multiple ultrastructural studies of insect sperm find only one centriole that has the canonical structure of microtubules organized in a ninefold symmetry (Anderson 1967; Tates 1971; Tokuyasu 1975a,b). This centriole forms the flagellum and is therefore the homolog to the vertebrate distal centriole. During spermatid differentiation (Figure 2A), a structure, called the centriolar adjunct (CA), appears transiently around this centriole (Friedlander and Wahrman 1971; Tates 1971; Tokuyasu 1975a,b; Wilson et al. 1997). The centriolar adjunct is a very dynamic structure, which shrinks during spermatid differentiation to form a collar around the distal centriole and then disappears (Tates 1971; Wilson et al. 1997). Studies using light microscopy found that γ-tubulin localizes and redistributes around the centriole in a way similar to the CA (Wilson et al. 1997), suggesting that it may serve as its marker. Earlier electron microscopy (EM) studies describe the appearance of a centriole inside the centriolar adjunct after it obtains the collar-shape structure (Anderson 1967; Phillips 1970). But this structure is amorphous and does not exhibit the morphological features of a centriole. Interestingly, the earliest intermediate observed during centriole formation is described as an amorphous structure (Anderson 1967; Dippell 1968; Sorokin 1968; Allen 1969).Open in a separate windowFigure 2.—Ana1 labels a novel structure appearing near the mother centriole in spermatids. (A) Diagram depicting the different stages of spermatid development based on the observations of Tates (1971). (M, mitochondria; N, nucleus; Ax, axoneme). The basal body or giant centriole (Cen) is surrounded by the centriolar adjunct (CA) and, near it, we can follow the formation of the PCL. (B) We use phase-contrast pictures (unfixed testis) to determine the spermatid stage. The onion stage (stage S13) is characterized by a round nucleus (N) of the same size as the mitochondrial derivatives (M). The cell body of intermediate spermatids (stages 15 and 16) elongates, forming short protrusions (arrows), but the nucleus remains round. In late spermatid development (stage 17), the nucleus becomes oval. Ana1-GFP labels the giant centriole (Cen), and in intermediate spermatids a bulge forms on one side and becomes individualized as PCL in late spermatid development. (C) Staining with anti-γ-tubulin antibody shows that the PCL labeled by Ana1 is an entity different from the γ-tubulin collar that is reminiscent of the centriolar adjunct (CA). (D) Antibody against Ana1 labels the V-shape pair of giant centrioles in primary spermatocytes (left) and the giant centriole and PCL in spermatids (right) in flies expressing Ana1-GFP. (E) In wild-type primary spermatocytes, anti-Ana1 antibody stains the endogenous protein in the giant centrioles and colocalizes with γ-tubulin staining (left). In spermatids, the antibody labels the PCL, demonstrating that its formation is not due to centriolar protein overexpression (right).Centriole duplication provides the cell with a mechanism for tightly controlling the number of centrosomes and cilia. In most cells, the centriole duplicates once per cell cycle and a single new centriole is formed in the vicinity of each mother centriole. The mechanism ensuring that only one daughter centriole forms in the vicinity of the mother centriole is not known (Strnad and Gonczy 2008). Two major limiting factors hinder the investigation of this process: (1) the difficulty of distinguishing between the mother centriole and the forming daughter centriole and (2) the short time that it takes for the process to reach completion, which in turn hinders the identification of intermediates. Few model systems are currently available for studying this process (Pelletier et al. 2006; Kleylein-Sohn et al. 2007).Here, we demonstrate that fly spermatids contain a novel structure that is labeled by centriolar proteins and that forms in the vicinity of the proximal end of the mother centriole. Because it is reminiscent of the vertebrate proximal centriole but no morphological signatures of a centriole have been observed, we propose to call it proximal centriole-like (PCL). While studying the pan-centriolar protein Ana1, we found that it labeled the PCL. The PCL forms before γ-tubulin is redistributed as a collar, showing that it is a distinct entity. We then found that the formation of the PCL depends on the proteins SAK/PLK4 and SAS-6, which are essential early in daughter centriole formation, but not on SAS-4, which in worms is required later in the process. These observations indicate that the PCL represents an early intermediate structure in centriole formation. We also tested the involvement of the centriolar protein Bld10p/Cep135, which was found in Chlamydomonas and humans to be a component of the centriole cartwheel and wall (Hiraki et al. 2007; Kleylein-Sohn et al. 2007). We found that Bld10p is recruited to the PCL only later in the process and is not required for PCL formation. We performed a genetic screen finding that the Drosophila ortholog of POC1 is essential for the formation of normal PCL. POC1 was identified previously in a proteomic screen as a centriolar protein and is localized to the early intermediate structure in centriole/basal body formation (Keller et al. 2005, 2008; Kilburn et al. 2007). We propose to use PCL formation as a model to study the molecular pathway for centriole initiation. Our results suggest that POC1, like PLK4 and SAS-6, plays an important role early in centriole formation whereas Bld10p function is required later as SAS-4 is.     

Asterless is a centriolar protein required for centrosome function and embryo development in Drosophila

BACKGROUND: Centrosomes, the major organizers of the microtubule network in most animal cells, are composed of centrioles embedded in a web of pericentriolar material (PCM). Recruitment and stabilization of PCM on the centrosome is a centriole-dependent function. Compared to the considerable number of PCM proteins known, the molecular characterization of centrioles is still very limited. Only a few centriolar proteins have been identified so far in Drosophila, most related to centriole duplication. RESULTS: We have cloned asterless (asl) and found that it encodes a 120 kD highly coiled-coil protein that is a constitutive pancentriolar and basal body component. Loss of asl function impedes the stabilization/maintenance of PCM at the centrosome. In embryos deficient for Asl, development is arrested right after fertilization. Asl shares significant homology with Cep 152, a protein described as a component of the human centrosome for which no functional data is yet available. CONCLUSIONS: The cloning of asl offers new insight into the molecular composition of Drosophila centrioles and a possible model for the role of its human homolog. In addition, the phenotype of asl-deficient flies reveals that a functional centrosome is required for Drosophila embryo development.     

Biogenesis of the centrosome during mammalian gametogenesis and fertilization

Summary Mammalian gametogenesis results in the production of highly specialized cells, sperm and oocytes, that are complementary in their arsenal of organelles and molecules necessary for normal embryonic development. Consequently, some of the zygotic structures, as illustrated in this review on the centrosome, are a combination of complementary paternal and maternal contributions. Mammalian oocytes are deprived of their centrioles during oogenesis, yet at the same time they generate a huge cytoplasmic reserve of centrosomal proteins. The active centrosome of spermatogenic stem cells is reduced to a single centriole that does not possess microtubule-nucle-ating activity. This centrosomal activity is restored at fertilization, when the sperm centriole is released into the oocyte cytoplasm, from which it attracts the oocyte-derived proteins of pericentriolar material and ultimately converts itself into an active zygotic centrosome. Subsequently, the microtubules around the zygotic centrosome are organized into a radial array called the sperm aster, that guides the apposition of male and female pronuclei, and the union of paternal and maternal genomes in the cytoplasm of a fertilized oocyte. The original sperm centriole duplicates and gives rise to the first mitotic spindle. This biparental mode of centrosome inheritance is seen in most mammals, except for rodents, where both centrioles are degraded during spermiogenesis and the zygotic centrosome is organized without any paternal contributions. The studies of centrosomal inheritance at fertilization provide the platform for designing new safe methods of assisted-reproduction and infertility treatments in humans.     

CP110 exhibits novel regulatory activities during centriole assembly in Drosophila

CP110 is a conserved centriole protein implicated in the regulation of cell division, centriole duplication, and centriole length and in the suppression of ciliogenesis. Surprisingly, we report that mutant flies lacking CP110 (CP110Δ) were viable and fertile and had no obvious defects in cell division, centriole duplication, or cilia formation. We show that CP110 has at least three functions in flies. First, it subtly influences centriole length by counteracting the centriole-elongating activity of several centriole duplication proteins. Specifically, we report that centrioles are ∼10% longer than normal in CP110Δ mutants and ∼20% shorter when CP110 is overexpressed. Second, CP110 ensures that the centriolar microtubules do not extend beyond the distal end of the centriole, as some centriolar microtubules can be more than 50 times longer than the centriole in the absence of CP110. Finally, and unexpectedly, CP110 suppresses centriole overduplication induced by the overexpression of centriole duplication proteins. These studies identify novel and surprising functions for CP110 in vivo in flies.     

Centriole Disassembly In Vivo and Its Effect on Centrosome Structure and Function in Vertebrate Cells

Glutamylation is the major posttranslational modification of neuronal and axonemal tubulin and is restricted predominantly to centrioles in nonneuronal cells (Bobinnec, Y., M. Moudjou, J.P. Fouquet, E. Desbruyères, B. Eddé, and M. Bornens. 1998. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 39:223–232). To investigate a possible relationship between the exceptional stability of centriole microtubules and the compartmentalization of glutamylated isoforms, we loaded HeLa cells with the monoclonal antibody GT335, which specifically reacts with polyglutamylated tubulin. The total disappearance of the centriole pair was observed after 12 h, as judged both by immunofluorescence labeling with specific antibodies and electron microscopic observation of cells after complete thick serial sectioning. Strikingly, we also observed a scattering of the pericentriolar material (PCM) within the cytoplasm and a parallel disappearance of the centrosome as a defined organelle. However, centriole disappearance was transient, as centrioles and discrete centrosomes ultimately reappeared in the cell population.During the acentriolar period, a large proportion of monopolar half-spindles or of bipolar spindles with abnormal distribution of PCM and NuMA were observed. However, as judged by a quasinormal increase in cell number, these cells likely were not blocked in mitosis.Our results suggest that a posttranslational modification of tubulin is critical for long-term stability of centriolar microtubules. They further demonstrate that in animal cells, centrioles are instrumental in organizing centrosomal components into a structurally stable organelle.     

A molecular marker for centriole maturation in the mammalian cell cycle

The centriole pair in animals shows duplication and structural maturation at specific cell cycle points. In G1, a cell has two centrioles. One of the centrioles is mature and was generated at least two cell cycles ago. The other centriole was produced in the previous cell cycle and is immature. Both centrioles then nucleate one procentriole each which subsequently elongate to full-length centrioles, usually in S or G2 phase. However, the point in the cell cycle at which maturation of the immature centriole occurs is open to question. Furthermore, the molecular events underlying this process are entirely unknown. Here, using monoclonal and polyclonal antibody approaches, we describe for the first time a molecular marker which localizes exclusively to one centriole of the centriolar pair and provides biochemical evidence that the two centrioles are different. Moreover, this 96-kD protein, which we name Cenexin (derived from the Latin, senex for "old man," and Cenexin for centriole) defines very precisely the mature centriole of a pair and is acquired by the immature centriole at the G2/M transition in prophase. Thus the acquisition of Cenexin marks the functional maturation of the centriole and may indicate a change in centriolar potential such as its ability to act as a basal body for axoneme development or as a congregating site for microtubule-organizing material.     

GIANT CENTRIOLE FORMATION IN SCIARA

Although somatic tissues of Sciara contain 9-membered centrioles, germ line tissues develop giant centrioles with 60–90 singlet tubules disposed in an oval array. Some 9-membered centrioles still may be seen in second instar spermatogonia. Each of these centrioles is associated with a larger "daughter" or secondary centriole at right angles to it. Most centrioles of second instar spermatogonia consist of 20–50 singlet tubules arranged in an oval, sometimes associated with an even larger secondary centriole. The more recently formed centriole of a pair is distinguishable from its partner by a concentric band of electron-opaque material inside its tubules. If a pair of centrioles at right angles to each other is pictured as a "T" formed by two cylinders, the secondary centriole is always the stem of the T; the primary centriole is the top. The two centrioles are oriented at the pole of the mitotic spindle so that the tubules of the primary centriole are parallel to the spindle axis. Each daughter cell receives a pair of centrioles and, during interphase, each of these centrioles gives rise to a new daughter centriole. A Golgi area of characteristic morphology is found in association with centrioles shortly after two new ones have formed. We conclude that in Sciara a centriole may give rise to a daughter morphologically different from itself. Whether the daughter is a 9-membered or giant centriole depends on the tissue type and stage of development.     

Sequential protein recruitment in C. elegans centriole formation

Formation of the microtubule-based centriole is a poorly understood process that is crucial for duplication of the centrosome, the principal microtubule-organizing center of animal cells . Five proteins have been identified as being essential for centriole formation in Caenorhabditis elegans: the kinase ZYG-1, as well as the coiled-coil proteins SAS-4, SAS-5, SAS-6, and SPD-2 . The relationship between these proteins is incompletely understood, limiting understanding of how they contribute to centriole formation. In this study, we established the order in which these five proteins are recruited to centrioles, and we conducted molecular epistasis experiments expanding on earlier work. We find that SPD-2 is loaded first and is needed for the centriolar localization of the four other proteins. ZYG-1 recruitment is required thereafter for the remaining three proteins to localize to centrioles. SAS-5 and SAS-6 are recruited next and are needed for the presence of SAS-4, which is incorporated last. Our results indicate in addition that the presence of SAS-5 and SAS-6 allows diminution of centriolar ZYG-1. Moreover, astral microtubules appear dispensable for the centriolar recruitment of all five proteins. Several of these proteins have homologs in other metazoans, and we expect the assembly pathway that stems from our work to be conserved.     

Overexpressing centriole-replication proteins in vivo induces centriole overduplication and de novo formation

BACKGROUND: Centrosomes have important roles in many aspects of cell organization, and aberrations in their number and function are associated with various diseases, including cancer. Centrosomes consist of a pair of centrioles surrounded by a pericentriolar matrix (PCM), and their replication is tightly regulated. Here, we investigate the effects of overexpressing the three proteins known to be required for centriole replication in Drosophila-DSas-6, DSas-4, and Sak. RESULTS: By directly observing centriole replication in living Drosophila embryos, we show that the overexpression of GFP-DSas-6 can drive extra rounds of centriole replication within a single cell cycle. Extra centriole-like structures also accumulate in brain cells that overexpress either GFP-DSas-6 or GFP-Sak, but not DSas-4-GFP. No extra centrioles accumulate in spermatocytes that overexpress any of these three proteins. Most remarkably, the overexpression of any one of these three proteins results in the rapid de novo formation of many hundreds of centriole-like structures in unfertilized eggs, which normally do not contain centrioles. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the levels of centriolar DSas-6 determine the number of daughter centrioles formed during centriole replication. Overexpression of either DSas-6 or Sak can induce the formation of extra centrioles in some tissues but not others, suggesting that centriole replication is regulated differently in different tissues. The finding that the overexpression of DSas-4, DSas-6, or Sak can rapidly induce the de novo formation of centriole-like structures in Drosophila eggs suggests that this process results from the stabilization of centriole-precursors that are normally present in the egg.     

Drosophila SPD-2 is an essential centriole component required for PCM recruitment and astral-microtubule nucleation

SPD-2 is a C. elegans centriolar protein required for both centriole duplication and pericentriolar material (PCM) recruitment [1-4]. SPD-2 is conserved in Drosophila (DSpd-2) and is a component of the fly centriole [5-7]. The analysis of a P element-induced hypomorphic mutation has shown that DSpd-2 is primarily required for PCM recruitment at the sperm centriole but is dispensable for both centriole duplication and aster formation [5]. Here we show that null mutations carrying early stop codons in the DSpd-2 coding sequence suppress astral microtubule (MT) nucleation in both neuroblasts (NBs) and spermatocytes. These mutations also disrupt proper Miranda localization in dividing NBs, as previously observed in mutants lacking astral MTs [8-10]. Spermatocyte analysis revealed that DSpd-2 is enriched at both the centrioles and the PCM and is required for the maintenance of cohesion between the two centrioles but not for centriole duplication. We found that DSpd-2 localization at the centrosome requires the wild-type activity of Asl but is independent of the function of D-PLP, Cnn, gamma-tubulin, DGrip91, and D-TACC. Conversely, DSpd-2 mutants displayed normal centrosomal accumulations of Asl and D-PLP, strongly reduced amounts of Cnn, gamma-tubulin, and DGrip91, and diffuse localization of D-TACC. These results indicate that DSpd-2 functions in a very early step of the PCM recruitment pathway.     

Proteomic analysis of isolated chlamydomonas centrioles reveals orthologs of ciliary-disease genes

BACKGROUND: The centriole is one of the most enigmatic organelles in the cell. Centrioles are cylindrical, microtubule-based barrels found in the core of the centrosome. Centrioles also act as basal bodies during interphase to nucleate the assembly of cilia and flagella. There are currently only a handful of known centriole proteins. RESULTS: We used mass-spectrometry-based MudPIT (multidimensional protein identification technology) to identify the protein composition of basal bodies (centrioles) isolated from the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. This analysis detected the majority of known centriole proteins, including centrin, epsilon tubulin, and the cartwheel protein BLD10p. By combining proteomic data with information about gene expression and comparative genomics, we identified 45 cross-validated centriole candidate proteins in two classes. Members of the first class of proteins (BUG1-BUG27) are encoded by genes whose expression correlates with flagellar assembly and which therefore may play a role in ciliogenesis-related functions of basal bodies. Members of the second class (POC1-POC18) are implicated by comparative-genomics and -proteomics studies to be conserved components of the centriole. We confirmed centriolar localization for the human homologs of four candidate proteins. Three of the cross-validated centriole candidate proteins are encoded by orthologs of genes (OFD1, NPHP-4, and PACRG) implicated in mammalian ciliary function and disease, suggesting that oral-facial-digital syndrome and nephronophthisis may involve a dysfunction of centrioles and/or basal bodies. CONCLUSIONS: By analyzing isolated Chlamydomonas basal bodies, we have been able to obtain the first reported proteomic analysis of the centriole.     

Asymmetric spindle pole formation in CPAP-depleted mitotic cells

CPAP is an essential component for centriole formation. Here, we report that CPAP is also critical for symmetric spindle pole formation during mitosis. We observed that pericentriolar material between the mitotic spindle poles were asymmetrically distributed in CPAP-depleted cells even with intact numbers of centrioles. The length of procentrioles was slightly reduced by CPAP depletion, but the length of mother centrioles was not affected. Surprisingly, the young mother centrioles of the CPAP-depleted cells are not fully matured, as evidenced by the absence of distal and subdistal appendage proteins. We propose that the selective absence of centriolar appendages at the young mother centrioles may be responsible for asymmetric spindle pole formation in CPAP-depleted cells. Our results suggest that the neural stem cells with CPAP mutations might form asymmetric spindle poles, which results in premature initiation of differentiation.     

Components and development of the centriolar complex during and beyond spermiogenesis in a passeridan bird, the Masked weaver (Ploceus velatus)

The fate of the proximal centriole in passeridan birds is an area of controversy and relative lack of knowledge in avian spermatogenesis and spermatology. This study examines, for the first time, spatiotemporal changes in the centriolar complex in various phases of spermiogenesis in a passerine bird, the Masked weaver (Ploceus velatus). It also describes the configuration of the centriolar complex and the relationship between it and the granular body in both intra- and extra-testicular spermatozoa. It is shown that the proximal centriole is retained and attaches, at its free end, to the granular body of spermatids in every step of spermiogenesis, as well as in mature intra-testicular and post-testicular spermatozoa, including those in the lumen of the seminal glomus. As the centriolar complex, along with its attached granular body, approaches the nucleus in the early spermatid, the proximal centriole articulates with the distal centriole at an acute angle of about 45°, and thereafter, both centrioles, still maintaining this conformation, implant, by means of their articulating proximal ends, at the implantation fossa of the nucleus. In the mature spermatid and spermatozoon, the granular body winds itself helically around the centriolar complex in the neck/midpiece region of the cell, and, thus, becomes the granular helix. The significance of this observation must await future studies, including possible phylogenetic re-evaluation and classification of birds.     

Superresolution characterization of core centriole architecture

The centrosome is the main microtubule-organizing center in animal cells. It comprises of two centrioles and the surrounding pericentriolar material. Protein organization at the outer layer of the centriole and outward has been studied extensively; however, an overall picture of the protein architecture at the centriole core has been missing. Here we report a direct view of Drosophila centriolar proteins at ∼50-nm resolution. This reveals a Sas6 ring at the C-terminus, where it overlaps with the C-terminus of Cep135. The ninefold symmetrical pattern of Cep135 is further conveyed through Ana1–Asterless axes that extend past the microtubule wall from between the blades. Ana3 and Rcd4, whose termini are close to Cep135, are arranged in ninefold symmetry that does not match the above axes. During centriole biogenesis, Ana3 and Rcd4 are sequentially loaded on the newly formed centriole and are required for centriole-to-centrosome conversion through recruiting the Cep135–Ana1–Asterless complex. Together, our results provide a spatiotemporal map of the centriole core and implications of how the structure might be built.