Ligand-dependent interaction of the dioxin receptor with target DNA

Wild type and nuclear transfer deficient mouse hepatoma cell lines were used to study the specific DNA binding of a dioxin inducible factor. This factor interacts with XRE only after dioxin treatment and is absent in receptor mutant containing cells even after treatment. Thus, evidence is provided to substantiate the claim that the dioxin receptor is involved in the specific DNA interaction with dioxin response enhancer elements. It is also shown that the molybdate stabilised dioxin-receptor interacts with hsp90 suggesting that, in similarity to the glucocorticoid receptor, the dioxin receptor is kept in a non-transformed state in the absence of ligand.     

The dioxin receptor: a comparison with the glucocorticoid receptor

The physico-chemical properties of the dioxin and glucocorticoid receptors from rat liver and wild-type and mutant cell lines were investigated and compared. In rat liver, the receptors are virtually indistinguishable. Both are highly asymmetrical proteins with axial ratios of 12-15, have Stokes radii of 6 nm and sedimentation coefficients of approximately 4 S. This results in a calculated apparent mol. wt of approximately 100,000. The dioxin receptor from the mouse hepatoma cell line Hepa 1c1c7 represents an atypical form of the dioxin receptor with a pronounced tendency to aggregate to form Mr approximately equal to 300,000 complexes in high ionic strength and in the absence of sodium molybdate. In the presence of sulphydryl reducing agents, however, the Hepa 1c1c7 dioxin receptor dissociates to an Mr approximately 100,000 species. In analogy to the nt- mutant glucocorticoid receptor in mouse lymphoma cells, there is no gross change in the structure of the nt- dioxin mutant in mouse hepatoma cells compared with the wild-type receptor. The nt- dioxin receptor does, however, have a reduced affinity for DNA.     

Polyanionic-binding properties of the receptor for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. A comparison with the glucocorticoid receptor

The interaction of the rat hepatic receptor for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (dioxin) with immobilized heparin (heparin-Sepharose) or DNA (DNA-cellulose) has been compared to the polyanionic-binding properties of the rat hepatic glucocorticoid receptor. Both the nonoccupied and in vitro occupied forms of the receptors interacted with heparin-Sepharose but with varying strength, as determined by ligand binding assays or an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on a monoclonal antibody against the steroid- and DNA-binding Mr approximately 94,000 glucocorticoid receptor protein. In the absence of ligand, both the dioxin and glucocorticoid receptors eluted from heparin-Sepharose at 0.1-0.2 M KCl, in contrast to the in vitro occupied receptor forms which eluted at 0.3-0.4 M KCl. Following elution of the in vitro occupied dioxin receptor from heparin-Sepharose, it was efficiently retained on DNA-cellulose and eluted at an ionic strength of approximately 0.2 M KCl. In the presence of 20 mM sodium molybdate which is known to inhibit the activation of steroid hormone receptors to a DNA-binding form, both the dioxin and glucocorticoid receptors eluted at 0.1-0.2 M KCl from heparin-Sepharose. In analogy to what has previously been shown for the glucocorticoid receptor, sodium molybdate stabilized a large dioxin-receptor complex with a sedimentation coefficient, S20,w, of 9-10 S, a Stokes radius of approximately 7.5 nm, and a calculated Mr of 290,000-310,000. Limited proteolysis of both the dioxin and glucocorticoid receptors with trypsin which is known to eliminate the DNA-binding property of both receptor forms also resulted in a decreased strength in the interaction of both in vitro occupied receptors with heparin-Sepharose (elution at 0.1-0.2 M KCl). In line with these data, calf thymus DNA in solution competed for receptor binding to heparin-Sepharose. In conclusion, the chromatographic properties of the dioxin receptor on heparin-Sepharose are indistinguishable from those of the glucocorticoid receptor, and both receptors appear to be structurally and functionally closely related proteins.     

Ligand-dependent recruitment of the Arnt coregulator determines DNA recognition by the dioxin receptor.

The intracellular basic region/helix-loop-helix (bHLH) dioxin receptor mediates signal transduction by dioxin (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) and functions as a ligand-activated DNA binding protein directly interacting with target genes by binding to dioxin response elements. Here we show that the partially purified, ligand-bound receptor alone could not bind target DNA. In contrast, DNA binding by the receptor could be induced by addition of a cytosolic auxiliary activity which functionally and biochemically corresponded to the bHLH factor Arnt. While Arnt exhibited no detectable affinity for the dioxin response element in the absence of the dioxin receptor, it strongly promoted the DNA binding function of the ligand-activated but not the ligand-free receptor forms. Arnt also functionally reconstituted in vitro the DNA binding activity of a mutant, nuclear translocation-deficient dioxin receptor phenotype in cytosolic extracts from a dioxin-resistant hepatoma cell line. Importantly, coimmunoprecipitation experiments showed that Arnt physically interacted in solution with the ligand-activated dioxin receptor but failed to heterodimerize with the ligand-free, hsp90-associated receptor form. Mutational analysis suggested that the functional interaction between these two factors occurred via the bHLH motif of Arnt. These data suggest that dioxin receptor activity is governed by a complex pattern of combinatorial regulation involving repression by hsp90 and then by ligand-dependent recruitment of the positive coregulator Arnt. The dioxin receptor system also provides the first example of signal-controlled dimerization of bHLH factors.     

Targeting the Escherichia coli lac repressor to the mammalian cell nucleus

We have previously shown that about 90% of total Escherichia coli lac repressor synthesized in mammalian cells is located in the cytoplasm [Hu and Davidson, Cell 48 (1987) 555-566]. To target a functional lac repressor to the nucleus, we mutated 10 nucleotides at the 3' end of the coding sequence, thus adding the nuclear localization signal of the simian virus 40 large-T antigen to the C terminus of the repressor. The mutant lacI gene and the wild-type (wt) gene, both in standard animal cell expression vectors, driven by the promoter of the Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat, were stably transfected into three rodent cell lines. In confirmation of our previous results, only about 10% of the wt repressor, but all of the mutant protein, was localized in the nucleus. DNase I footprint analyses showed that the mutant repressor retained the same operator DNA-binding specificity as wt repressor. Furthermore, both repressor-operator complexes could be dissociated by addition of isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside in vitro. However, the ratio of number of repressor molecules per nucleus that, by in vitro assay, could bind to the operator sequence to the number of monomer repressor polypeptides per nucleus, as determined by Western blotting, was about 1:4 for the wt repressor and about 1:30 for the mutant repressor. This suggests that: (a) the mutant repressor assembles into tetramers inefficiently; and/or (b) it has reduced binding affinity to the operator sequence; and/or (c) it has higher binding affinity to nonspecific DNA.     

The dioxin receptor: characterization of its DNA-binding properties

The binding of the rat hepatic dioxin and glucocorticoid receptors to the polyanionic matrices heparin-Sepharose and DNA-cellulose in vitro and to cell nuclei in vivo was studied under various conditions. In a non-liganded and non-activated state both receptors eluted from heparin-Sepharose at a low ionic strength and were not retained on DNA-cellulose. Following ligandation and activation in vitro both receptors showed an increased affinity for heparin-Sepharose and were retained on DNA-cellulose. In analogy to these in vitro data, it was found that a high salt concentration (0.4 M KCl) was required to extract in vivo liganded dioxin receptor from purified nuclear preparations in contrast to that previously reported for non-liganded nuclear receptors. Limited proteolysis of both dioxin and glucocorticoid receptors resulted in molecular species of similar binding properties with regard to DNA-cellulose and heparin-Sepharose. We conclude that, in addition to the dioxin and glucocorticoid receptors showing considerable similarities in their physicochemical properties, they may also share a similar structural organization with regard to functional domains.     

Effects of bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A, S protein, and S peptide on activation of purified rat hepatic glucocorticoid-receptor complexes

Bovine pancreatic ribonuclease (RNase) A and S protein (enzymatically inactive proteolytic fragment of RNase A which contains RNA binding site) stimulate the activation, as evidenced by increasing DNA-cellulose binding, of highly purified rat hepatic glucocorticoid-receptor complexes. These effects are dose dependent with maximal stimulation of DNA-cellulose binding being detected at approximately 500 micrograms (50 units of RNase A/mL). RNase A and S protein do not enhance DNA-cellulose binding via their ability to interact directly with DNA or to increase nonspecific binding of receptors to cellulose. Neither S peptide (enzymatically inactive proteolytic fragment which lacks RNA binding site) nor cytochrome c, a nonspecific basic DNA binding protein, mimics these effects. RNase A and S protein do not stimulate the conformational change which is associated with activation and is reflected in a shift in the elution profile of receptor complexes from DEAE-cellulose. In contrast, these two proteins interact with previously heat-activated receptor complexes to further enhance their DNA-cellulose binding capacity and thus mimic the effects of an endogenous heat-stable cytoplasmic protein(s) which also function(s) during step 2 of in vitro activation [Schmidt, T. J., Miller-Diener, A., Webb, M. L., & Litwack, G. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 16255-16262]. Preadsorption of RNase A and S protein to an RNase affinity resin containing an inhibitory RNA analogue, or trypsin digestion of the RNA binding site within S protein, eliminates the subsequent ability of these two proteins to stimulate DNA-cellulose binding of the purified receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mechanism of action of an antiprogesterone, RU486, in the rabbit endometrium. Effects of RU486 on the progesterone receptor and on the expression of the uteroglobin gene

RU486 is a recently described antiprogesterone. In order to be able to understand its mechanism of action it is necessary to analyze its effect on a discrete gene product. We show here that the induction of uteroglobin mRNA by progesterone in the rabbit endometrium may be a suitable model for such studies since RU486 totally inhibits this effect without itself exerting any agonistic activity. Moreover, RU486, which does not bind to the estrogen receptor and is devoid of general antiestrogenic activity, partially inhibits the induction by estradiol of uteroglobin mRNA. Studies of the interaction between [3H]RU486 and the progesterone receptor have been undertaken with the aim of understanding the antagonistic effect of this compound. The binding to DNA-cellulose of heat-activated [3H]RU486-receptor complexes was slightly decreased (37%) when compared with that of the agonist [3H]R5020-receptor complexes (47%). Detailed analysis of this difference showed that it was due to both a decreased activation of complexes and to a diminished affinity of activated complexes towards DNA. The change in activation was shown by the fact that at high concentrations of DNA, where all activated complexes are bound, agonist-receptor complexes were bound to DNA in higher proportion than antagonist-receptor complexes. Moreover a difference was also observed when studying the binding of agonist-receptor and antagonist-receptor complexes to charged resins (phosphocellulose, DEAE-cellulose) which are known to discriminate between activated and non-activated complexes. Decreased affinity to DNA of antagonist-receptor complexes was shown by studying their binding at various concentrations of DNA, either in crude cytosol or after isolating a homogenous population of activated-receptor complexes by DNA-cellulose chromatography and by comparing the salt extraction from DNA-cellulose of agonist-receptor and antagonist-receptor complexes. Both effects (decreased activation and diminished affinity towards DNA) were relatively moderate and could account only for a small decrease in the agonistic activity of RU486. Thus, the fact that this compound is a complete antagonist without any agonistic activity can only be explained by a defect in some further step of hormone action as, for instance in the specific interaction with the regulatory regions of the uteroglobin gene. No immunological difference could be detected between [3H]R5020-receptor and [3H]RU486-receptor complexes, both interacted with the five monoclonal antibodies raised against purified R5020-receptor complexes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Maximizing the purification of the activated glucocorticoid receptor by DNA-cellulose chromatography.

With heat treatment (20 degrees C for 30 min), the glucocorticoid-receptor complex becomes 'activated' and undergoes an increase in affinity for DNA. A two-stage procedure was used to separate sequentially the rat liver glucocorticoid-receptor complex from proteins with high and low affinity for DNA. DNA-cellulose column chromatography of unheated cytosol resulted in the retention of DNA-binding proteins, but not the unactivated receptor complex. Heat treatment of the column eluate resulted in increased affinity of the receptor complex to DNA, and chromatography on DNA-cellulose then yielded receptor complex free from proteins with low affinity for DNA. Removal of DNA-binding proteins during the first chromatographic step was critically dependent on ionic conditions and the ratio of cytosol chromatographed to DNA-cellulose. A purification of 11000-fold (85% yield) was achieved by this procedure. The partially purified receptor complex was taken up by rat liver nuclei.