Chimeric G proteins extend the range of insect cell-based functional assays for human G protein-coupled receptors

We previously described a functional assay for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) based on stably transformed insect cells and using the promiscuous G protein Galpha16. We now show that, compared with Galpha16, the use of chimeric Galphaq subunits with C-terminal modifications (qi5-HA, qo5-HA, or qz5-HA) significantly enhances the ability of insect cells to redirect Gi-coupled GPCRs into a Gq-type signal transduction pathway. We coexpressed human Gi-coupled GPCRs, G protein alpha subunits (either a chimeric Galphaq or Galpha16), and the calcium-sensitive reporter protein aequorin in Sf9 cells using a nonlytic protein expression system, and measured agonist-induced intracellular calcium flux using a luminometer. Three of the GPCRs (serotonin 1A, 1D, and dopamine D2) were functionally redirected into a Gq-type pathway when coexpressed with the chimeric G proteins, compared with only one (serotonin 1A) with Galpha16. We determined agonist concentration-response relationships for all three receptors, which yielded EC50 values comparable with those achieved in mammalian cell-based assay systems. However, three other Gi-coupled GPCRs (the opioid kappa1 and delta1 receptors, and serotonin 1E) were not coupled to calcium flux by either the G protein chimeras or Galpha16. Possible reasons and solutions for this result are discussed.     

Dynamic regulation of a GPCR-tetraspanin-G protein complex on intact cells: central role of CD81 in facilitating GPR56-Galpha q/11 association

By means of a variety of intracellular scaffolding proteins, a vast number of heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) may achieve specificity in signaling through a much smaller number of heterotrimeric G proteins. Members of the tetraspanin family organize extensive complexes of cell surface proteins and thus have the potential to act as GPCR scaffolds; however, tetraspanin-GPCR complexes had not previously been described. We now show that a GPCR, GPR56/TM7XN1, and heterotrimeric G protein subunits, Galpha(q), Galpha(11), and Gbeta, associate specifically with tetraspanins and CD81, but not with other tetraspanins. CD9 Complexes of GPR56 with CD9 and CD81 remained intact when fully solubilized and were resistant to cholesterol depletion. Hence they do not depend on detergent-insoluble, raft-like membrane microdomains for stability. A central role for CD81 in promoting or stabilizing a GPR56-CD81-Galpha(q/11) complex was revealed by CD81 immunodepletion and reexpression experiments. Finally, antibody engagement of cell surface CD81 or cell activation with phorbol ester revealed two distinct mechanisms by which GPR56-CD81-Galpha(q/11) complexes can be dynamically regulated. These data reveal a potential role for tetraspanins CD9 and CD81 as GPCR scaffolding proteins.     

Expression analysis of a modified factor X in stably transformed insect cell lines.

A modified Factor X protein was combined with a cellulose-binding domain tag and expressed in insect cell lines. The protein, CBDFX, was expressed and secreted into the medium. Stable, transformed Hi5 and Sf9 insect cell lines were generated and tested for production of secreted CBDFX. The highest Sf9 and Hi5 CBDFX-producing cell lines were scaled up to 2-liter fermentors to evaluate production of this recombinant protein. Secreted protein production levels reached 4 mg/liter for the stable, transformed Hi5 cell line and 18 mg/liter for the stable, transformed Sf9 cell line. The protein was properly processed as determined by amino terminal sequencing and bound well to the cellulose substrate Avicel. In addition the activated recombinant CBDFX(a) was capable of recognizing and efficiently processing a Factor X cleavage site.     

Cloning and characterization of the G protein betagamma subunits from Trichoplusia ni (High Five cells)

Baculoviral-mediated expression in insect cells has become a method of choice where high-level protein expression is desired and where expression in Escherichia coliform (E. coli.) is unsuitable. Genes of interest are inserted into the baculoviral genome of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcNPV) under the extremely strong, but very late polyhedron gene (PolH). The preferred host lines are derived from Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9 or Sf21) or Tricoplusia ni (High Five, Invitrogen). Viral expression in insect cells is commonly used in the signal transduction field, due to the more than satisfactory capacity to express membrane proteins. However, co-association and/or co-purification of contaminating endogenous host G protein subunits, for example, may potentially threaten the functional and structural homogeneity of membrane preparations. The undefined G protein composition is complicated by the limited sequence data of either the S. frugiperda or Tricoplusia ni genomes. Here we report the isolation of cDNAs encoding two members of the heterotrimeric G protein family, Gbeta (Tn-Gbeta) and Ggamma (Tn-Ggamma), from Tricoplusia ni. Tn-Gbeta shares approximately 90% amino acid sequence identity with Gbeta from Drosophila melanogaster and 84% identity with mammalian Gbeta (human Gbeta1). Tn-Ggamma shares approximately 71% amino acid identity with D. melanogaster Ggamma1 and 42% identity with mammalian Ggamma (human Ggamma2). Tn-Gbetagamma is also functionally similar to mammalian Gbeta1gamma2 by virtue of their capacity to form a complex with mammalian Galpha subunits, support G-protein-dependent agonist binding to a mammalian G protein-coupled receptor (beta2-adrenergic receptor) and directly regulate effectors such as adenylyl cyclase.     

Influence of cytosolic AGS3 on receptor--G protein coupling

Activator of G protein signaling 3 (AGS3) activates the Gbetagamma mating pathway in yeast in a manner that is independent of heptahelical receptors. It competes with Gbetagamma subunits to bind GDP-bound Gi/o(alpha) subunits via four repeated G protein regulatory (GPR) domains in the carboxyl-terminal half of the molecule. However, little is known about the functional role of AGS3 in cellular signaling. Here the effect of AGS3 on receptor-G protein coupling was examined in an Sf9 cell membrane-based reconstitution system. A GST-AGS3-GPR fusion protein containing the four individual AGS3-GPR domains inhibits receptor coupling to Galpha subunits as effectively as native AGS3 and more effectively than GST fusion proteins containing the individual AGS3-GPR domains. While none of the GPR domains distinguished among the three G(i)alpha subunits, both individual and full-length GPR domains interacted more weakly with G(o)alpha than with G(i)alpha. Cytosolic AGS3, but not membrane-associated AGS3, can interact with G(i)alpha subunits and disrupt their receptor coupling. Immunoblotting studies reveal that cytosolic AGS3 can remove G(i)alpha subunits from the membrane and sequester G(i)alpha subunits in the cytosol. These findings suggest that AGS3 may downregulate heterotrimeric G protein signaling by interfering with receptor coupling.     

Expression of functional G protein beta gamma dimers of defined subunit composition using a baculovirus expression system.

The 36-kDa beta 1, 35-kDa beta 2, and 6.5-kDa gamma 2 subunits of the heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins have been overexpressed in Sf9 cells using a baculovirus expression system. The gamma 2 subunit expressed in Sf9 cells incorporated label derived from [3H]mevalonate and is therefore likely to be isoprenylated, as is its mammalian counterpart. Extracts of Sf9 cells doubly infected with viruses encoding a beta subunit and viruses encoding a gamma subunit are active in promoting the pertussis toxin-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation of a G protein alpha subunit. However, extracts from Sf9 cells singly infected with viruses encoding either a beta or gamma subunit are not active in this assay. Results demonstrate utility of the insect/baculovirus system for expressing G protein beta gamma subunits of defined composition.     

G Protein activation without subunit dissociation depends on a G{alpha}(i)-specific region

G proteins transmit a variety of extracellular signals into intracellular responses. The Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits are both known to regulate effectors. Interestingly, the Galpha subunit also determines subtype specificity of Gbetagamma effector interactions. However, in light of the common paradigm that Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits dissociate during activation, a plausible mechanism of how this subtype specificity is generated was lacking. Using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based assay developed to directly measure mammalian G protein activation in intact cells, we demonstrate that fluorescent Galpha(i1,2,3), Galpha(z), and Gbeta(1)gamma(2) subunits do not dissociate during activation but rather undergo subunit rearrangement as indicated by an activation-induced increase in FRET. In contrast, fluorescent Galpha(o) subunits exhibited an activation-induced decrease in FRET, reflecting subunit dissociation or, alternatively, a distinct subunit rearrangement. The alpha(B/C)-region within the alpha-helical domain, which is much more conserved within Galpha(i1,2,3) and Galpha(z) as compared with that in Galpha(o), was found to be required for exhibition of an activation-induced increase in FRET between fluorescent Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits. However, the alpha(B/C)-region of Galpha(il) alone was not sufficient to transfer the activation pattern of Galpha(i) to the Galpha(o) subunit. Either residues in the first 91 amino acids or in the C-terminal remainder (amino acids 93-354) of Galpha(il) together with the alpha(B/C)-helical region of Galpha(i1) were needed to transform the Galpha(o)-activation pattern into a Galpha(i1)-type of activation. The discovery of subtype-selective mechanisms of G protein activation illustrates that G protein subfamilies have specific mechanisms of activation that may provide a previously unknown basis for G protein signaling specificity.     

The luteinizing hormone receptor activates phospholipase C via preferential coupling to Gi2.

Binding of lutropin/choriogonadotropin (LH/CG) to its cognate receptor results in the activation of adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase C. This divergent signaling of the LH receptor is based on the independent activation of distinct G protein subfamilies, i.e. , Gs, Gi, and potentially also Gq. To examine the selectivity of LH receptor coupling to phospholipase C beta-activating G proteins, we used an in vivo reconstitution system based on the coexpression of the LH receptor and different G proteins in baculovirus-infected insect cells. In this paper, we describe a refined expression strategy for the LH receptor in insect cells. The receptor protein was inserted into the cell membrane at an expression level of 0.8 pmol/mg of membrane protein. Sf9 cells expressing the LH receptor responded to hCG challenge with a concentration-dependent accumulation of intracellular cAMP (EC50 = 630 nM) but not of inositol phosphates, whereas stimulation of the histamine H1 receptor in Sf9 cells led to increased phospholipase C (PLC) activity. Immunoblotting experiments using G protein-specific antisera revealed the absence of quantitative amounts of alpha i in Sf9 cells, whereas alpha s and alpha q/11 were detected. We therefore attempted to restore the hCG-dependent PLC activation by infection of Sf9 cells with viruses encoding the LH receptor and different G protein alpha subunits. HCG stimulation of cells coexpressing the LH receptor and exogenous alpha i2 resulted in stimulation of PLC activity. In cells coinfected with an alpha i3-baculovirus, hCG challenge led to a minor activation of PLC, whereas no hCG-dependent PLC stimulation was observed in cells coexpressing alpha i1. Most notably, coinfection with baculoviruses encoding alpha q or alpha 11 did not reproduce the PLC activation by the LH receptor. Thus, the murine LH receptor activates adenylyl cyclase via Gs and PLC via selective coupling to Gi2.     

C-terminal truncated cannabinoid receptor 1 coexpressed with G protein trimer in Sf9 cells exists in a precoupled state and shows constitutive activity

We have investigated the existence of a precoupled form of the distal C-terminal truncated cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1-417) and heterotrimeric G proteins in a heterologous insect cell expression system. CB1-417 showed higher production levels than the full-length receptor. The production levels obtained in our expression system were double the values reported in the literature. We also observed that at least the distal C-terminus of the receptor was not involved in receptor dimerization, as was predicted in the literature. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer, we found that CB1-417 and Galpha(i1)beta(1)gamma(2) proteins were colocalized in the cells. GTPgammaS binding assays with the Sf9 cell membranes containing CB1-417 and the G protein trimer showed that the receptor could constitutively activate the Galpha(i1) protein in the absence of agonists. A CB1-specific antagonist (SR 141716A) inhibited this constitutive activity of the truncated receptor. We found that the CB1-417/Galpha(i1)beta(1)gamma(2) complex could be solubilized from Sf9 cell membranes and coimmunoprecipitated. In this study, we have proven that the receptor and G proteins can be coexpressed in higher yields using Sf9 cells, and that the protein complex is stable in detergent solution. Thus, our system can be used to produce sufficient quantities of the protein complex to start structural studies.     

Selective regulation of Galpha(q/11) by an RGS domain in the G protein-coupled receptor kinase, GRK2

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are well characterized regulators of G protein-coupled receptors, whereas regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins directly control the activity of G protein alpha subunits. Interestingly, a recent report (Siderovski, D. P., Hessel, A., Chung, S., Mak, T. W., and Tyers, M. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 211-212) identified a region within the N terminus of GRKs that contained homology to RGS domains. Given that RGS domains demonstrate AlF(4)(-)-dependent binding to G protein alpha subunits, we tested the ability of G proteins from a crude bovine brain extract to bind to GRK affinity columns in the absence or presence of AlF(4)(-). This revealed the specific ability of bovine brain Galpha(q/11) to bind to both GRK2 and GRK3 in an AlF(4)(-)-dependent manner. In contrast, Galpha(s), Galpha(i), and Galpha(12/13) did not bind to GRK2 or GRK3 despite their presence in the extract. Additional studies revealed that bovine brain Galpha(q/11) could also bind to an N-terminal construct of GRK2, while no binding of Galpha(q/11), Galpha(s), Galpha(i), or Galpha(12/13) to comparable constructs of GRK5 or GRK6 was observed. Experiments using purified Galpha(q) revealed significant binding of both Galpha(q) GDP/AlF(4)(-) and Galpha(q)(GTPgammaS), but not Galpha(q)(GDP), to GRK2. Activation-dependent binding was also observed in both COS-1 and HEK293 cells as GRK2 significantly co-immunoprecipitated constitutively active Galpha(q)(R183C) but not wild type Galpha(q). In vitro analysis revealed that GRK2 possesses weak GAP activity toward Galpha(q) that is dependent on the presence of a G protein-coupled receptor. However, GRK2 effectively inhibited Galpha(q)-mediated activation of phospholipase C-beta both in vitro and in cells, possibly through sequestration of activated Galpha(q). These data suggest that a subfamily of the GRKs may be bifunctional regulators of G protein-coupled receptor signaling operating directly on both receptors and G proteins.     

Absence of G(i) proteins in the Sf9 insect cell. Characterization of the uncoupled recombinant N-formyl peptide receptor.

We investigated the interaction of the N-formyl peptide receptor (NFPR) with G proteins in infected Sf9 insect cells expressing the recombinant NFPR. Recombinant receptor expression of up to 27 pmol/mg protein was achieved in these cells. The receptor was recognized by an antiserum raised against an NFPR carboxyl-terminal peptide, and displayed specific and saturable binding of the formyl peptide ligand fMet-Leu-[3H]Phe. Scatchard analysis of the binding data yielded a dissociation constant of approximately 62 nM, a binding affinity of 60- to 120-fold lower than that of the high affinity sites in neutrophils and in transfected mammalian cell lines expressing the NFPR. That this low binding affinity was due to a lack of receptor coupling to G protein was suggested by the failure of guanine nucleotides to regulate receptor affinity and by the lack of formyl peptide-stimulated GTPase activity in these cells. Furthermore, immunoblotting with an anti-G(i) antibody and ADP-ribosylation experiments indicated that the approximately 40-kDa G(i) alpha subunit, which couples to the NFPR in neutrophils, is not present in Sf9 cell membranes. Thus, the current study provides for the first time evidence that a major G protein is absent in the Sf9 insect cells. Potential applications of the Sf9 system for in vitro reconstitution of the NFPR-G protein interaction are discussed.     

A functional assay for G-protein-coupled receptors using stably transformed insect tissue culture cell lines

Insect cells are an underexplored resource for functional G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) assays, despite a strong record in biochemical (binding) assays. Here we describe the use of vectors capable of creating stably transformed insect cell lines to generate a cell-based functional GPCR assay. This assay employs the luminescent photoprotein aequorin and the promiscuous G-protein subunit Galpha16 and is broadly applicable to human GPCRs. We demonstrate that the assay can quantitate ligand concentration-activity relationships for seven different human GPCRs, can differentiate between partial and full agonists, and can determine rank order potencies for both agonists and antagonists that match those seen with other assay systems. Human Galpha16 improves signal strength but is not required for activity with some receptors. The coexpression of human and bovine betagamma subunits and/or phospholipase Cbeta makes no difference to agonist efficacy or potency. Two different receptors expressed in the same cell line respond to their specific agonists, and two different cell lines (Sf9 and High 5) are able to functionally detect the same expressed GPCR. Sf9 cells have the capability to produce fully functional human receptors, allied to a low background of endogenous receptors, and so are a valuable system for investigating orphan GPCRs and receptor dimerization.     

eat-11 encodes GPB-2, a Gbeta(5) ortholog that interacts with G(o)alpha and G(q)alpha to regulate C. elegans behavior

In C. elegans, a G(o)/G(q) signaling network regulates locomotion and egg laying [1-8]. Genetic analysis shows that activated Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) is suppressed by perturbations of this network, which include loss of the GOA-1 G(o)alpha, DGK-1 diacylglycerol kinase, EAT-16 G protein gamma subunit-like (GGL)-containing RGS protein, or an unidentified protein encoded by the gene eat-11 [9]. We cloned eat-11 and report that it encodes the Gbeta(5) ortholog GPB-2. Gbeta(5) binds specifically to GGL-containing RGS proteins, and the Gbeta(5)/RGS complex can promote the GTP-hydrolyzing activity of Galpha subunits [10, 11]. However, little is known about how this interaction affects G protein signaling in vivo. In addition to EAT-16, the GGL-containing RGS protein EGL-10 participates in G(o)/G(q) signaling; EGL-10 appears to act as an RGS for the GOA-1 G(o)alpha, while EAT-16 appears to act as an RGS for the EGL-30 G(q)alpha [4, 5]. We have combined behavioral, electrophysiological, and pharmacological approaches to show that GPB-2 is a central member of the G(o)/G(q) network and that GPB-2 may interact with both the EGL-10 and EAT-16 RGS proteins to mediate the opposing activities of G(o)alpha and G(q)alpha. These interactions provide a mechanism for the modulation of behavior by antagonistic G protein networks.     

Effects of partial agonists and Mg2+ ions on the interaction of M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor and G protein Galpha i1 subunit in the M2-Galpha i1 fusion protein

We have expressed a M(2)-Galpha(i1) fusion protein in insect cells, in which the G protein alpha(i1) subunit was fused with a mutant of the muscarinic receptor M(2) subtype without glycosylation sites and the central part of the third intracellular loop. The M(2)-Galpha(i1) fusion protein showed GTP-sensitive, high-affinity agonist binding. Displacement curves by GDP of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding shifted to the right in the presence of muscarinic agonists. The extent of the shift was greater for full agonists (120-150 fold) than for partial agonists (25-35 fold), and virtually no shift was observed for antagonists. The affinity for GDP decreased with increasing MgCl(2) concentration in the presence of an agonist but was not affected by MgCl(2) in the presence of an antagonist. These results indicate that the apparent affinity for GDP of the M(2)-Galpha(i1) fusion protein bound to a ligand represents the efficacy of the given ligand, and that Mg(2+) is required for the agonist-bound M(2) to interact with Galpha(i1), reducing its affinity for GDP. We propose that the agonist-M(2)-Galpha(i1) complex represents the transition state for the GDP-GTP exchange reaction catalyzed by agonist-bound receptors, and that the complex has different affinities for GDP depending on the species of the ligand bound to M(2) receptors.     

Coordinated agonist regulation of receptor and G protein palmitoylation and functional rescue of palmitoylation-deficient mutants of the G protein G11alpha following fusion to the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor: palmitoylation of G11alpha is not required for interaction with beta*gamma complex.

Transfection of either the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor or Galpha(11) into a fibroblast cell line derived from a Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) double knockout mouse failed to produce elevation of intracellular [Ca(2+)] upon the addition of agonist. Co-expression of these two polypeptides, however, produced a significant stimulation. Co-transfection of the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor with the palmitoylation-resistant C9S,C10S Galpha(11) also failed to produce a signal, and much reduced and kinetically delayed signals were obtained using either C9S Galpha(11) or C10S Galpha(11). Expression of a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and Galpha(11) allowed [Ca(2+)](i) elevation, and this was also true for a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and C9S,C10S Galpha(11), since this strategy ensures proximity of the two polypeptides at the cell membrane. For both fusion proteins, co-expression of transducin alpha, as a beta.gamma-sequestering agent, fully attenuated the Ca(2+) signal. Both of these fusion proteins and one in which an acylation-resistant form of the receptor was linked to wild type Galpha(11) were also targets for agonist-regulated [(3)H]palmitoylation and bound [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) in an agonist concentration-dependent manner. The potency of agonist to stimulate [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was unaffected by the palmitoylation potential of either receptor or G protein. These studies provide clear evidence for coordinated, agonist-mediated regulation of the post-translational acylation of both a receptor and partner G protein and demonstrate the capacity of such fusions to bind and then release beta.gamma complex upon agonist stimulation whether or not the G protein can be palmitoylated. They also demonstrate that Ca(2+) signaling in EF88 cells by such fusion proteins is mediated via release of the G protein beta.gamma complex.     

Molecular dissection of G protein preference using Gsalpha chimeras reveals novel ligand signaling of GPCRs

Although only 16 genes have been identified in mammals, several Galpha subunits can be simultaneously activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to modulate their complicated functions. Current GPCR assays are limited in the evaluation of selective Galpha activation, thus not allowing a comprehensive pathway screening. Because adenylyl cyclases are directly activated by G(s)alpha and the carboxyl termini of the various Galpha proteins determine their receptor coupling specificity, we proposed a set of chimeric G(s)alpha where the COOH-terminal five amino acids are replaced by those of other Galpha proteins and used these to dissect the potential Galpha linked to a given GPCR. Unlike G(q)alpha, G(12)alpha, and G(i)alpha outputs, compounding the signals from several Galpha members, the chimeric G(s)alpha proteins provide a superior molecular approach that reflects the previously uncharacterized pathways of GPCRs under the same cAMP platform. This is, to our knowledge, the first time allowing verification of the whole spectrum of Galpha coupling preference of adenosine A1 receptor, reported to couple to multiple G proteins and modulate many physiological processes. Furthermore, we were able to distinguish the uncharacterized pathways between the two neuromedin U receptors (NMURs), which distribute differently but are stimulated by a common agonist. In contrast to the G(q) signals mainly conducted by NMUR1, NMUR2 routed preferentially to the G(i) pathways. Dissecting the potential Galpha coupling to these GPCRs will promote an understanding of their physiological roles and benefit the pharmaceutical development of agonists/antagonists by exploiting the selective affinity toward a certain Galpha subclass.     

Regulators of G protein signaling 6 and 7. Purification of complexes with gbeta5 and assessment of their effects on g protein-mediated signaling pathways.

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins that contain DEP (disheveled, EGL-10, pleckstrin) and GGL (G protein gamma subunit-like) domains form a subfamily that includes the mammalian RGS proteins RGS6, RGS7, RGS9, and RGS11. We describe the cloning of RGS6 cDNA, the specificity of interaction of RGS6 and RGS7 with G protein beta subunits, and certain biochemical properties of RGS6/beta5 and RGS7/beta5 complexes. After expression in Sf9 cells, complexes of both RGS6 and RGS7 with the Gbeta5 subunit (but not Gbetas 1-4) are found in the cytosol. When purified, these complexes are similar to RGS11/beta5 in that they act as GTPase-activating proteins specifically toward Galpha(o). Unlike conventional G(betagamma) complexes, RGS6/beta5 and RGS7/beta5 do not form heterotrimeric complexes with either Galpha(o)-GDP or Galpha(q)-GDP. Neither RGS6/beta5 nor RGS7/beta5 altered the activity of adenylyl cyclases types I, II, or V, nor were they able to activate either phospholipase C-beta1 or -beta2. However, the RGS/beta5 complexes inhibited beta(1)gamma(2)-mediated activation of phospholipase C-beta2. RGS/beta5 complexes may contribute to the selectivity of signal transduction initiated by receptors coupled to G(i) and G(o) by binding to phospholipase C and stimulating the GTPase activity of Galpha(o).     

G protein specificity: traffic direction required

This review focuses on the coupling specificity of the Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits of pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G(i/o) proteins that mediate diverse signaling pathways, including regulation of ion channels and other effectors. Several lines of evidence indicate that specific combinations of G protein alpha, beta and gamma subunits are required for different receptors or receptor-effector networks, and that a higher degree of specificity for Galpha and Gbetagamma is observed in intact systems than reported in vitro. The structural determinants of receptor-G protein specificity remain incompletely understood, and involve receptor-G protein interaction domains, and perhaps other scaffolding processes. By identifying G protein specificity for individual receptor signaling pathways, ligands targeted to disrupt individual pathways of a given receptor could be developed.     

Motion of carboxyl terminus of Galpha is restricted upon G protein activation. A solution NMR study using semisynthetic Galpha subunits

The carboxyl terminus of the G protein alpha subunit plays a key role in interactions with G protein-coupled receptors. Previous studies that have incorporated covalently attached probes have demonstrated that the carboxyl terminus undergoes conformational changes upon G protein activation. To examine the conformational changes that occur at the carboxyl terminus of Galpha subunits upon G protein activation in a more native system, we generated a semisynthetic Galpha subunit, site-specifically labeled in its carboxyl terminus with 13C amino acids. Using expressed protein ligation, 9-mer peptides were ligated to recombinant Galpha(i1) subunits lacking the corresponding carboxyl-terminal residues. In a receptor-G protein reconstitution assay, the truncated Galpha(i1) subunit could not be activated by receptor; whereas the semisynthetic protein demonstrated functionality that was comparable with recombinant Galpha(i1). To study the conformation of the carboxyl terminus of the semisynthetic G protein, we applied high resolution solution NMR to Galpha subunits containing 13C labels at the corresponding sites in Galpha(i1): Leu-348 (uniform), Gly-352 (alpha carbon), and Phe-354 (ring). In the GDP-bound state, the spectra of the ligated carboxyl terminus appeared similar to the spectra obtained for 13C-labeled free peptide. Upon titration with increasing concentrations of AlF4-, the 13C resonances demonstrated a marked loss of signal intensity in the semisynthetic Galpha subunit but not in free peptide subjected to the same conditions. Because AlF4- complexes with GDP to stabilize an activated state of the Galpha subunit, these results suggest that the Galpha carboxyl terminus is highly mobile in its GDP-bound state but adopts an ordered conformation upon activation by AlF4-.