Transition metal complexes with sulfur ligands. XXVIII. Ruthenium complexes of the pentadentate thioether thiolate ligands dpttd (2,3,11,12-dibenzo-1,4,7,10,13-pentathiatridecane(−2)) and the sterically demanding derivative bu4-dpttd (14,16,18,20-tetra (t-butyl)-2,3,11,12-dibenzo-1,4,7,10,13-pentathiatridecane(−2))

The template alkylation of Li₂[Ru(CO)₂(S₂C₆H₄)₂] (S₂C₆H₄²⁻ = 1,2-benzenedithiolate(−2)) by S(C₂H₄Br)₂ yields [Ru(CO)₂(dpttd)] (dpttd²⁻ = 3,11,12-dibenzo-1,4,7,10,13-pentathiatridecane(−2)) which is thermally converted into the monocarbonyl complex [Ru(CO)(dpttd)]. The reactions of dpttd-H₂ or dpttd²⁻ with [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃], [RuCl₂(DMSO)₄], [RuCl₃(PhSCH₃)₃] and RuCl₃(NO)·xH₂O lead to [Ru(L)(dpttd)] and [Ru(L)(dpttd)]Cl (L = PPh₃, DMSO, PhSCH₃, NO), respectively, which are practically insoluble in all common solvents. Better soluble complexes are obtained with the new sterically demanding ligand ^tbu₄-dpttd²⁻ = 14,16,18,20-tetra(t-butyl)-2,3,11,12-dibenzo-1,4,7, 10,13-pentathiatridecane(−2); it is obtained in isomerically pure form by the reaction of tetrabuthylammonium-3,5-di (t-butyl)-1,2-benzenethiolthiolate, NBu₄[^tbu₂-C₆H₂S(SH), with S(C₂H₄Br)₂ and yields on reaction with [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] the very soluble [Ru(PPh₃)₂(^tbu₄-dpttd)] as well as [Ru(PPh₃(^tbu₄-dpttd)]. The ¹H NMR and ³¹P NMR spectra indicate that in solution [Ru(PPh₃)₂(^tbu₄-dpttd)] exists as a mixture of diastereomers, whereas [Ru(PPh₃)(^tbu₄-dpttd)] forms one pair of enantiomers only. This was confirmed by an X-ray structure determination of a single crystal. [Ru(PPh₃)(^tbu₄-dpttd)] crystallizes in space group P2₁/n with a = 10.496(4), b = 14.888(6), c = 32.382(12) Å, β = 98.04(3)°, Z = 4 and D_calc. = 1.27 g/cm³, R = 4.84; R_W = 5.06%; the ruthenium center is coordinated pseudooctahedrally by one phosphorus, two thiolate and three thiother S atoms.     

Structure, spectra and electrochemistry of ruthenium-carbonyl complexes of naphthylazoimidazole

[Ru(H)(CO)(PPh₃)₂(α/β-NaiR)](ClO₄) (3, 4) are synthesized by the reaction of [Ru(H)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with 1-alkyl-2-(naphthyl-α/β-azo)imidazole (α-NaiR (3); β-NaiR (4)). One of the complexes [Ru(H)(CO)(PPh₃)₂(α-NaiMe)](ClO₄) (3a) has been structurally established by X-ray diffraction study. Upon addition of Cl₂ saturated in MeCN to 3 or 4 gives [Ru(Cl)(CO)(α/β-NaiR)(PPh₃)₂](ClO₄) (for α-NaiR (5); β-NaiR (6)), without affecting metal oxidation state, which were characterized by spectroscopic measurements. The redox property of the complexes is examined by cyclic voltammetry.     

Ruthenium hydride and vinyl complexes supported by nitrogen-oxygen mixed-donor ligands

The Schiff base, 2-chlorophenylsalicylaldimine (HL₁), is formed readily from salicylaldehyde and 2-chloroaniline. After deprotonation, this ligand is found to react as a bidentate mixed-donor chelate with the complexes [RuRCl(CO)(BTD)(PPh₃)₂] (R = H, CHCHC₆H₅, CHCHC₆H₄Me-4, CHCH^tBu, CCCPhCHPh; BTD = 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole) to form the compounds [RuR(L₁)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] through displacement of the chloride and BTD ligands. An analogous reaction occurs with the osmium complex [OsHCl(CO)(BTD)(PPh₃)₂] to provide [OsH(L₁)(CO)(PPh₃)₂]. The compound [Ru(CHCHC₆H₄Me-4)(L₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] is formed through reaction of salicylaldehyde (HL₂) with [Ru(CHCHC₆H₄Me-4)Cl(CO)(BTD)(PPh₃)₂] in the presence of base. Two further ligands were investigated to extend the study to encompass 5- and 4-membered chelates; 8-hydroxyquinoline (HL₃) and 2-hydroxy-4-methylquinoline (HL₄) react with [Ru(CHCHPh)Cl(CO)(BTD)(PPh₃)₂] and [Ru(CHCHC₆H₄Me-4)Cl(CO)(BTD)(PPh₃)₂] in the presence of base to yield the complexes [Ru(CHCHPh)(L₃)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] and [Ru(CHCHC₆H₄Me-4)(L₄)(CO)(PPh₃)₂], respectively. The crystal structure of [Ru(CHCHC₆H₄Me-4)(L₁)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] is reported.     

Dithionitronium hexachloroantimonate: A thionitrosylating reagent

The reaction of Ru(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂ with (NS₂)(SbCl₆) in acetonitrile results in the formation of [Ru(CO)₂(NS₂)(PPh₃)₂](SbCl₆) which reacts with PPh₃ to give the thionitrosyl complex [Ru(CO)₂(NS)(PPh₃)₂](SbCl₆). The NS₂-complex in CH₂Cl₂ gives Ru(CO)₂Cl₂(PPh₃)₂.     

Reactions of the Tridentate and Tetradentate Amine Ligands di-(2-picolyl)(N-ethyl)amine and 2,5-Bis-(2-pyridylmethyl)-2,5 diazohexane with Technetium Nitrosyl Complexes

The reaction of the Tc(II) nitrosyl complex (Bu₄N)[Tc(NO)Cl₄] with di-(2-picolyl)(NEt)amine in methanol yields the neutral complex [Tc(NO)Cl(py-N(Et)-py)]. The reaction of the Tc(I) nitrosyl complex [Tc(NO)Cl₂(HOMe)(PPh₃)₂] with this tridentate ligand yields cationic [Tc(NO)Cl(py-N(Et)-py)(PPh₃)]Cl. These two complexes have been structurally characterized. The reaction of [Tc(NO)Cl₂(HOMe)(PPh₃)₂] with the tetradentate ligand 1,4-bis-(2-pyridylmethyl)-1,4-diazobutane yields a mixture of products including cationic [Tc(NO)Cl(py-NH-NH-py)]Cl and cationic [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh₃)(py-NH-NH∼py)]Cl, with a pyridyl terminus left dangling.     

Structural variations and spectroscopic properties of copper(I) complexes with bis(schiff base) ligands

Six copper(I) complexes {[Cu₂(L1)(PPh₃)₂I₂] · 2CH₂Cl₂}_n (1), {[Cu₂(L2)(PPh₃)₂]BF₄}_n (2), [Cu₂(L3)(PPh₃)₄I₂] · 2CH₂Cl₂ (3), [Cu₂(L4)(PPh₃)₄I₂] (4), [Cu₂(L5)(PPh₃)₂I₂] (5) and [Cu₂(L6)(PPh₃)₂I₂] (6) have been prepared by reactions of bis(schiff base) ligands: pyridine-4-carbaldehyde azine (L1), 1,2-bis(4′-pyridylmethyleneamino)ethane (L2), pyridine-3-carbaldehyde azine (L3), 1,2-bis(3′-pyridylmethyleneamino)ethane (L4), pyridine-2-carbaldehyde azine (L5), 1,2-bis(2′-pyridylmethyleneamino)ethane (L6) with PPh₃ and copper(I) salt, respectively. Ligand L1 or L2 links (PPh₃)₂Cu₂(μ-I)₂ units to form an infinite coordination polymer chain. Ligand 3 or 4 acts as a monodentate ligand to coordinate two copper(I) atoms yielding a dimer. Ligand 5 or 6 chelates two copper(I) atoms using pyridyl nitrogen and imine nitrogen to form a dimer. Complexes 1-4 exhibit photoluminescence in the solid state at room temperature. The emission has been attributed to be intraligand π-π* transition mixed with MLCT characters.     

Studies on the reactions of ruthenium(II) substrates with tridentate (N,N,O) azo ligands

Reactions of 1-{[2-(arylazo)phenyl]iminomethyl}-2-phenol, HL_sal, 1, [where H represents the dissociable protons upon complexation and aryl groups of HL_sal are phenyl for HL¹_sal, p-methylphenyl for HL²_sal, and p-chlorophenyl for HL³_sal], ligands with Ru(H)(CO)(Cl)(PPh₃)₃ afforded complexes of composition [(L_sal)Ru(CO)(Cl)(PPh₃)] and (L_sal)₂Ru where the N,N,O donor tridentate (L_sal)⁻ ligands coordinated the metal centre facially and meridionally, respectively. Stepwise formation of [(L_sal)₂Ru] has been ascertained. Reaction of 1-{[2-(arylazo)phenyl]iminomethyl}-2-napthol, HL_nap, 2, [where H represents the dissociable protons upon complexation and aryl groups of HL_nap are phenyl for HL¹_nap, p-methylphenyl for HL²_nap, and p-chlorophenyl for HL³_nap], ligands with Ru(H)(CO)(Cl)(PPh₃)₃ afforded exclusively the complexes of composition [(L_nap)Ru(CO)(Cl)(PPh₃)], where N,N,O donor tridentate (L_nap)⁻ was facially coordinated. The ligand 1-{[2-(phenylazo)phenyl]aminomethyl}-2-phenol, HL, 3, was prepared by reducing the aldimine function of HL¹_sal. Reaction of HL with Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂ afforded new azosalen complex of Ru(III) in concert with regiospecific oxygenation of phenyl ring of HL. All the new ligands were characterized by analytical and spectroscopic techniques. The complexes were characterized by analytical and spectroscopic techniques and subsequently confirmed by the determination of X-ray structures of selected complexes.     

Synthesis, characterization and reactivity of polypyridyl ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes with phosphine derivatives: Ruthenium-carbon bond labilization based on steric and electronic effects

Ruthenium phosphine complexes with a CO ligand [Ru(tpy)(PR₃)(CO)Cl]⁺ (tpy = 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine, R = Ph or p-tolyl), were prepared by introduction of CO gas to the corresponding dichloro complexes at room temperature. New carbonyl complexes were characterized by various methods including structural analyses. They were shown to release CO following the addition of several N-donors to form the corresponding substituted complexes. The kinetic data and structural results observed in this study indicated that the CO release reactions proceeded in an interchange mechanism. The molecular structures of [Ru(tpy)(PPh₃)(CO)Cl]PF₆, [Ru(tpy)(P(p-tolyl)₃)(CO)Cl]PF₆ and [Ru(tpy)(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)Cl]PF₆ were determined by X-ray crystallography.     

Cyclopentadienyl ruthenium(II) dithiocarbamate complexes: Crystal structures of [CpRu(PPh3)(S2CNPr2)] and [CpRu(PPh3)(S2CNMeBu)]

Thermolysis of [CpRuCl(PPh₃)₂] and NaS₂CNPr₂ or NaS₂CNMeBu in methanol affords the ruthenium(II) dithiocarbamate complexes, [CpRu(PPh₃)(S₂CNPr₂)] and [CpRu(PPh₃)(S₂CNMeBu)], which have been crystallographically characterized. A similar treatment of two equivalents of [CpRuCl(PPh₃)₂] with the bis(dithiocarbamate) ligand derived from 1,3-homopiperazine affords [{CpRu(PPh₃)}₂(μ-S₂CNC₅H₁₀NCS₂)].     

Structures of sulfur-rich dithiolate-gold(I) complexes and their oxidation

[NMe₄][Au(PEt₃)(C₃S₅)], [NMe₄][Au(PPh₃)(C₃S₅)], [NMe₄][Au(PEt₃)(C₈H₄S₈)], [N-methylpyridinium][Au(PPh₃)(C₈H₄S₈)], [(PEt₃)Au-C₃S₅-Au(PEt₃)], and [(PEt₃)Au-C₈H₄S₈-Au(PEt₃)] [C₃S₅²⁻=4,5-disulfanyl-1,3-dithiole-2-thionate(2−); C₈H₄S₈²⁻=2-{(4,5-ethylenedithio)-1,3-dithiole-2-ylidene}-1,3-dithiole-4,5-dithionate(2−)] were prepared. They exhibited first oxidation potentials due to the dithiolate ligand-centered oxidation at −0.30 to +0.21 V (vs. Ag/Ag⁺) in dichloromethane. They were reacted with iodine or 7,7,8,8-tetracyano-p-quinodimethane (TCNQ) to afford one-electron-oxidized species [Au(PEt₃)(C₈H₄S₈)] and [(L)Au-C₈H₄S₈-Au(L)](TCNQ)_1.0-1.1, (L=PEt₃ and PPh₃) and further-electron-oxidized species [Au(PEt₃)(S-S)]I_3.3-5.7, [Au(PPh₃)(S-S)]I_12-13, [(PEt₃)Au-(S-S)-Au(PEt₃)]I_3.3-5.5 (S-S=C₃S₅²⁻ and C₈H₄S₈²⁻) and [(PPh₃)Au-C₈H₄S₈-Au(PPh₃)]I₁₂. ESR spectra of the oxidized species suggest the C₃S₅ and C₈H₄S₈ ligand-centered oxidation. The oxidized C₈H₄S₈-complexes showed electrical conductivities of 10⁻⁴-10⁻² S cm⁻¹ measured for compacted pellets at room temperature. X-ray crystal structures of [NMe₄][Au(PPh₃)(C₃S₅)]CH₂Cl₂, [(PEt₃)Au-C₃S₅-Au(PEt₃)] and [(PEt₃)Au-C₈H₄S₈-Au(PEt₃)] were revealed.     

Phosphane effects on formation and reactivity of [Ru(L)(PR3)(`N2Me2S2')] complexes with L=N2, N2H4, NH3, and CO

Metal-sulfur complex fragments, to which small molecules like N₂, N₂H₂, N₂H₄, NH₃, or CO can bind, are desirable model compounds concerning enzymatic N₂ fixation.This paper reports on the effects of the phosphane co-ligand on formation and reactivity of [Ru(L)(PR₃)(`N<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>')] [`N₂Me₂S₂'²⁻=1,2-ethanediamine-N,N^′-dimethyl-N,N^′-bis(2-benzenethiolate)(2−)] complexes with nitrogenase relevant ligands, especially N₂, N₂H₄, NH₃, and CO.Treatment of [Ru(NCCH₃)₄Cl₂] with Li₂`N<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>', excessive LiOMe, bulky PPh<sub>3</sub> or PCy<sub>3</sub>, respectively, led to the formation of two series of [Ru(L)(PR<sub>3</sub>)(`N₂Me₂S₂')] complexes [for R=Ph: 1b, 1c (L=NCCH₃), 6b (L=N₂H₄), 7b (L=N₂), 8b_1-3 (L=CO), 9b (L=NH₃); for R=Cy: 1a (L=NCCH₃), 6a (L=N₂H₄), 7a (L=N₂), 8a (L=CO), 9a (L=NH₃)]. While the use of PPh₃ (θ=145°) yielded cis,trans and cis,cis isomers of [Ru(NCCH₃)(PPh₃)(`N<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>')] (1b, 1c), no isomer formation was observed with the bulkier phosphane PCy<sub>3</sub> (θ=170°). Sterically less demanding phosphanes (θ=118-132°) afforded bisphosphane complexes [Ru(PR<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(`N₂Me₂S₂')] [2d (R=Me), 2e (R=Et), 2f (R=nPr), and 2g (R=nBu)], which were practically inert and could only be converted in two cases and under drastic reaction conditions into the CO complexes [Ru(CO)(PR₃)(`N<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>')] [4e (R=Et), 4f (R=nPr)]. The chelating bidentate phosphane dppe (bisdiphenylphosphanoethane) yielded exclusively the mononuclear complex [Ru(dppe)(`N₂Me₂S₂')] (3).     

The arylation of [Pt2(μ-S)2(PPh3)4]

Routes to the synthesis of the mixed sulfide-phenylthiolate complex [Pt₂(μ-S)(μ-SPh)(PPh₃)₄]⁺ have been explored; reaction of [Pt₂(μ-S)₂(PPh₃)₄] with excess Ph₂IBr proceeds readily to selectively produce this complex, which was structurally characterised as its PF₆⁻ salt. Reactions of [Pt₂(μ-S)₂(PPh₃)₄] with other potent arylating reagents (1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene and 1,5-difluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene) also produce the corresponding nitroaryl-thiolate complexes [Pt₂(μ-S){μ-SC₆H₂(NO₂)₂X}(PPh₃)₄]⁺ (X = H, F). The complex [Pt₂(μ-S)(μ-SPh)(PPh₃)₄]⁺ reacts with Me₂SO₄ to produce the mixed alkyl/aryl bis-thiolate complex [Pt₂(μ-SMe)(μ-SPh)(PPh₃)₄]²⁺, but corresponding reactions with the nitroaryl-thiolate complexes are plagued by elimination of the nitroaryl group and formation of [Pt₂(μ-SMe)₂(PPh₃)₄]²⁺. [Pt₂(μ-S)(μ-SPh)(PPh₃)₄]⁺ also reacts with Ph₃PAuCl to give [Pt₂(μ-SAuPPh₃)(μ-SPh)(PPh₃)₄]²⁺.     

Reaction of iron and ruthenium halogenide complexes with GaCp and AlCp: Insertion, Cp transfer reactions and orthometallation

The reactions of the Fe(II) and Ru(II) halogenide complexes [Fe(PPh₃)₂Br₂], [Fe(NCCH₃)₂Br₂], [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂], and [Ru(dmso)₄Cl₂] with GaCp^∗ and AlCp^∗, respectively, are investigated. The reactions of [FeBr₂L₂] with ECp^∗ exclusively proceed via Cp^∗ transfer, leading to [FeCp^∗(GaCp^∗)(GaBr₂)(PPh₃)] (1) (L = PPh₃, E = Ga), [FeCp^∗(GaCp^∗)₂ (GaBr₂)] (2) (L = NCCH₃, E = Ga) and [FeCp^∗(μ³-H)(κ²-(C₆H₄)PPh₂)(AlCp^∗)(AlBr₂)] (3) (L = PPh₃, E = Al), the latter of which is formed via orthometallation of one PPh₃ ligand. The reaction of [Ru(dmso)₄Cl₂] leads to the homoleptic complex [Ru(GaCp^∗)₆Cl₂] (4) in high yields, while [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] gives 4 in rather low yields. The reason for this difference in reactivity is investigated and it is shown that Cp^∗ transfer and orthometallation are the limiting side reactions of the reaction of [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] with GaCp^∗. All compounds were characterized by NMR spectroscopy, and single crystal X-ray diffraction studies were performed for 1, 3, and 4.     

Dinuclear ruthenium complexes containing tripodal dithiophosphonate ligands

Treatment of [(η⁶-p-cymene)RuCl(μ-Cl)]₂ with Lawesson’s reagent [ArP(S)(μ-S)]₂ (Ar = p-C₆H₄OMe) in the presence of ammonium hydroxide afforded the dinuclear complex [(η⁶-p-cymene)Ru{μ-η¹(S),η²(S,S′)-ArP(O)S₂}]₂ (1) in which the tripodal [ArP(O)S₂]²⁻ ligands bind to the ruthenium atom in both bridging and chelating modes with two non-coordinating PO groups. Interaction of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with [ArP(S)(μ-S)]₂ and bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) in the presence of ammonium hydroxide gave the dinuclear complex [Ru(CO){μ₃-η¹(O),η²(S,S′)-ArP(O)S₂}(dppm)]₂ (2) in which the tripodal [ArPOS₂]²⁻ ligands bind the two Ru atoms via both sulfur and oxygen atoms. Treatment of [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] with [ArP(S)(μ-S)]₂ at reflux in the presence of ammonium hydroxide led to the formation of the dinuclear mixed valence complex [Ru₂Cl₂(μ-S){μ₃-η¹(O),η¹(S),-η²(S,S′)-ArP(O)S₂}(PPh₃)₃] (3), which contains a [Ru^II(PPh₃)₂Cl]⁺ and [Ru^IV(PPh₃)Cl]³⁺ moieties by the tripodal [ArPOS₂]²⁻ ligand in a μ₃-η¹(O),η¹(S),η²(S,S′) coordination mode and the μ-S²⁻ anion. The crystal structures of 1, 2, and 3·CH₂Cl₂ along with their spectroscopic and electrochemical properties are reported.     

Ruthenium(II/III) mediated transformation of 1,2-bis(2′-pyridylmethyleneimino)benzene (L) to 2-(2′-benzimidazolyl)pyridine (L′H) and its in situ formed complexes with Ru(II): X-ray structure of trans-[Ru(PPh3)2(L′H)2](ClO4)2

A series of ruthenium (II) complexes of formulae trans-[Ru(PPh₃)₂(L′H)₂](ClO₄)₂ (1), [Ru(bpy)(L′H)₂](ClO₄)₂ (2), [Ru(bpy)₂(L′H)](ClO₄)₂ (3), cis-[Ru(DMSO)₂(L′H)₂]Cl₂ (4), and [Ru(L′H)₃](PF₆)₂ (5) (where L′H = 2-(2′-benzimidazolyl)pyridine) have been synthesized by reaction of the appropriate ruthenium precursor with 1,2-bis(2′-pyridylmethyleneimino)benzene (L). The complexes were characterized by elemental analyses, spectroscopic and electrochemical data. All the complexes were found to be diamagnetic and hence metal is in +2 oxidation state. The molecular structure of trans-[Ru(PPh₃)₂(L′H)₂](ClO₄)₂ has been determined by the single crystal X-ray diffraction studies. The molecular structure shows that Ru(II) is at the center of inversion of an octahedron with N₄P₂ coordination sphere. The ligand acts as a bidentate N,N′donor. The electronic spectra of the complexes display intense MLCT bands in the visible region.Cyclic voltammetric studies show quasi-reversible oxidative response at 0.99-1.32 V (vs Ag/AgCl reference electrode) due to Ru(III)/Ru(II) couple.     

Syntheses, reactions, and structures of osmium(II) stannyl complexes with the simple stannyl ligands SnH3, SnH2Me, and SnHMe2

Reaction between Os(SnI₃)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ and NaBH₄ produces the unusual, air-stable, trihydridostannyl complex, Os(SnH₃)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (1), which has been fully characterised including by X-ray crystal structure determination.Similarly, reaction between Os(SnI₂Me)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ or Os(SnClMe₂)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ and NaBH₄ produces the dihydridostannyl complex, Os(SnH₂Me)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (4) or the monohydridostannyl complex, Os(SnHMe₂)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (6), respectively.The SnH bonds in these complexes are reactive towards acids and in selected reactions complexes 1 and 4 with aqueous HF give Os(SnF₃)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (3) and Os(SnF₂Me)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (5), respectively, and complex 6 with aqueous HCl gives Os(SnClMe₂)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂.The trihydridostannyl complex 1 reacts with chloroform to form the trichlorostannyl complex, Os(SnCl₃)(κ²- S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (2). The crystal structures of 1-3, 5, and 6 have been determined.     

Synthesis and characterization of ruthenium and osmium complexes of heterocyclic bidentate ligands (N, X), X = S, Se

The reaction of [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] and [OsBr₂(PPh₃)₃] precursors with a series of heterocyclic bidentate (N, X) ligands, X = S, Se, gave complexes [M(R-pyS)₂(PPh₃)₂], (R = H, 3-CF₃, 5-CF₃, 3-Me₃Si); [M(R-pymS)₂(PPh₃)₂], (R = 4-CF₃, 4,6-MeCF₃) and [M(R-pySe)₂(PPh₃)₂], (R = H, 3-CF₃, 5-CF₃), where M is Ru or Os, pyS and pymS the anions of pyridine-2-thione and pyrimidine-2-thione, respectively, and pySe is the anion produced by the reductive cleavage of the Se-Se bond in the dipyridyl-2,2′-diselenide. All of the compounds obtained were characterized by microanalysis, IR, FAB, NMR spectroscopy and by cyclic voltammetry. Compounds [Ru(3-CF₃-pyS)₂(PPh₃)₂] · 2(CH₂Cl₂) (2), [Ru(3-Me₃Si-pyS)₂(PPh₃)₂] (4), [Ru(4-CF₃-pymS)₂(PPh₃)₂] (5), [Ru(3-CF₃-pySe)₂(PPh₃)₂] · 2(CH₂Cl₂) (8), [Os(3-CF₃-pyS)₂(PPh₃)₂] · (CHCl₃) (11), [Os(3-Me₃Si-pyS)₂(PPh₃)₂] (13), [Os(3-CF₃-pySe)₂(PPh₃)₂] · 2(CH₂Cl₂) (17), [Os(5-CF₃-pySe)₂(PPh₃)₂] · 2(H₂O) (18) and [OsCl₂(4,6-MeCF₃-pymS)(PPh₃)₂] (19) were also characterized by X-ray diffraction. In all cases, the metal is in a distorted octahedral environment with the heterocyclic ligand acting as a bidentate (N, S) chelate system.     

Preparation of benzophenone imine complexes of transition metals

Benzophenone imine [M(η¹-NHCPh₂)(CO)_nP_5-n]BPh₄ [M = Mn, Re; n = 2, 3; P = P(OEt)₃, PPh(OEt)₂, PPh₂OEt, PPh₃] complexes were prepared by allowing triflate M(κ¹-OTf)(CO)_nP_5-n compounds to react with an excess of the imine. Hydride-imine [MH(η¹-NHCPh₂)P₄]BPh₄ (M = Ru, Os), triflate-imine [Os(κ¹-OTf)(η¹-NHCPh₂)P₄]BPh₄ and bis(imine) [Ru(η¹-NHCPh₂)₂P₄](BPh₄)₂ [P = P(OEt)₃] derivatives were also prepared. The complexes were characterized spectroscopically (IR, ¹H, ³¹P, ¹³C NMR) and a geometry in solution was also established. Hydride-benzophenone imine [IrHCl(η¹-NHCPh₂)L(PPh₃)₂]BPh₄and [IrHCl(η¹-NHCPh₂)L(AsPh₃)₂]BPh₄ [L = P(OEt)₃ and PPh(OEt)₂] complexes were prepared by reacting hydride IrHCl₂L(PPh₃)₂ and IrHCl₂L(AsPh₃)₂ precursors with an excess of imine. Dihydride IrH₂(η¹-NHCPh₂)(PPh₃)₃ complex was also obtained and a geometry in solution was proposed.     

Rational enhancement of the coordination capability of Ru(III)(salen)-nitronyl nitroxide building block: A step towards 2p–3d–4d magnetic edifices

The reaction of [Ru(salen)(PPh₃)Cl] and the 5-imidazol-substituted nitronyl nitroxide radical (NIT-(5)ImH) yields the [Ru(salen)(PPh₃)(NIT-(5)ImH)](ClO₄) (1) complex which has been characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. This analysis reveals that the Ru(III) ion is coordinated to a tetradentate salen^2? ligand in equatorial positions while one PPh₃ ligand and one NIT-(5)ImH radical are coordinated in axial positions. This led to Ru^III ions in tetragonally elongated octahedral geometry. From the magnetic point of view ferromagnetic intramolecular interaction (J₁ = +2.47 cm^?1) have been found between the Ru(III) ion and the coordinated NIT-(5)ImH while no significant intermolecular antiferromagnetic interactions are observed at low temperature leading to a ground spin state S = 1. The absence of intermolecular magnetic interaction is explained by considering the crystal packing of (1) where the [Ru(salen)(PPh₃)(NIT-(5)ImH)]⁺ moieties are relatively well isolated. This has to be compared with the situation observed in the previously reported [Ru(salen)(PPh₃)-(NIT)]⁺ compound (2) where ferromagnetic Ru^III–NIT interaction were identified and the crystal packing generate intermolecular antiferromagnetic interactions that complicated the study. The analysis of this compound confirms the rather isotropic g values that were found of (2) and of [Ru(salen)(PPh₃)(N₃)], (3) a radical-free analogue. Moreover it is also a step towards extended structures based on Ru^III–NIT moieties since this compound possesses a free bischelating site likely to coordinate additional metallic ions.     

Optically active iridium complexes with cyclopentadienyl-phosphine ligands: synthesis and oxidative addition of methyl iodide

The dimer [Ir(μ-Cl)(C₈H₁₄)₂]₂ reacts with the ligands (S)-(C₅H₄CH₂CH(Ph)PPh₂)Li and (R)-(C₅H₄CH(Cy)CH₂PPh₂)Li to give (S)-[Ir(η⁵-C₅H₄CH₂CH(Ph)PPh₂-κP)(C₈H₁₄)] and (R)-[Ir(η⁵-C₅H₄CH(Cy)CH₂PPh₂-κP)(C₈H₁₄)], which upon treatment with CH₃I at room temperature afford the cationic iridium(III) compounds (S,S_Ir)-[Ir(η⁵-C₅H₄CH₂CH(Ph)PPh₂-κP)(CH₃)(C₈H₁₄)][I] as a single diastereomer, and (R)-[Ir(η⁵-C₅H₄CH(Cy)CH₂PPh₂-κP)(CH₃)(C₈H₁₄)][I] as a 9:1 mixture of two diastereomers. If the oxidative addition reaction is performed at reflux in methylene chloride, the starting complexes convert to the neutral compounds (S)-[Ir(η⁵-C₅H₄CH₂CH(Ph)PPh₂-κP)(CH₃)(I)] and (R)-[Ir(η⁵-C₅H₄CH(Cy)CH₂PPh₂-κP)(CH₃)(I)] as 1.6:1 and 3.3:1 mixtures of diastereoisomers, respectively. Carbonyl iridium complexes are synthesized by reacting [IrCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂] with the ligands to afford (S)-[Ir(η⁵-C₅H₄CH₂CH(Ph)PPh₂-κP)(CO)] and (R)-[Ir(η⁵-C₅H₄CH(Cy)CH₂PPh₂-κP)(CO)]. They give upon treatment with CH₃I the cationic species (S)-[Ir(η⁵-C₅H₄CH₂CH(Ph)PPh₂-κP)(CH₃)(CO)][I] and (R)-[Ir(η⁵-C₅H₄CH(Cy)CH₂PPh₂-κP)(CH₃)(CO)][I] as 1.6:1 and 3:1 mixture of diastereomers, respectively. No migratory-insertion of the methyl group into the carbonyl-metal bond has been observed even after prolonged heating.