Sequence of centromere separation: differential replication of pericentric heterochromatin in multicentric chromosomes

The dicentric and multicentric chromosomes in L cells and a brain tumor cell line of mouse display only one site of kinetochore formation associated with the active centromere. The accessory or inactive centromeres show premature separation. These cell lines were treated with 10^–6 M 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) followed by anti-BrdUrd antibody to study the pattern of replication of pericentric heterochromatin flanking the active vs inactive centromeres. Regardless of its quantity, heterochromatin around the inactive centromere replicates earlier than that associated with the active centromere. There appears to be a relationship between the timing of separation of a centromere and the timing of replication of pericentric heterochromatin. The premature replication of heterochromatin associated with an inactive centromere may be responsible for its premature separation and, hence, inactivity.     

Decondensation of pericentric heterochromatin alters the sequence of centromere separation in mouse cells

The centromeres of a genome separate in a sequential, nonrandom manner that is apparently dependent upon the quantity and quality of pericentric heterochromatin. It is becoming increasingly clear that the biological properties of a centromere depend upon its physicochemical makeup, such as its tertiary structure, and not necessarily on its particular nucleotide sequence. To test this idea we altered the physical state of the AT-rich pericentric heterochromatin of mouse with Hoechst 33258 (bis-benzimidazole) and studied a biological parameter, viz., sequence of separation. We report that an alteration in the physical state of heterochromatin, i.e., decondensation, is accompanied by aberrations in the pattern of centromere separation. The most dramatic effect seems to be on chromosomes with large blocks of heterochromatin. Many chromosomes with large blocks of heterochromatin that, in untreated cells, separate late tend to separate early. Decondensation with Hoechst 33258 does not seem to alter the sequence of separation of inactive centromeres relative to that of active centromeres. These data indicate that alteration in the physical parameters of the pericentric heterochromatin might dispose the centromeres to errors. It is likely that this aberration results from early replication of the pericentric heterochromatin associated with active centromeres. Received: 24 August 1998; in revised form: 24 August 1998 / Accepted: 28 August 1998     

Sequence of centromere separation: influence of pericentromeric heterochromatin (repetitive DNA) inMus

A relationship between the sequence of centromere separation and quantity of pericentromeric constitutive heterochromatin was studied using bone marrow cells ofMus musculus molossinus and three cell lines, viz., SEWA-Rec 4, brain tumor and L-cells, ofM. m. domesticus origin. The timing of separation of a centromere into two daughter centromeres is related to the quantity of pericentromeric heterochromatin. In these genomes, having qualitatively uniform DNA in their heterochromatin fraction, the chromosomes with none or small quantities of heterochromatin separate first. These are followed by those chromosomes which have increasingly larger quantities of heterochromatin. It appears that one function of repetitive DNA (pericentromeric heterochromatin) is to regulate the timing of separation of centromeres.     

Q-bands in Lilium and their relationship to C-banded heterochromatin

In L. pardalinum, narrow bands of quinacrine fluorescence are distributed throughout the chromosomes. These vary in intensity from dull to bright, and their constant pattern allows all chromosomes to be recognized. Bright bands occur at some centromeres, and near all three nucleolar constrictions. In L. longiflorum, similar Q-bands occur along chromosomes, but they are less distinctive and their pattern does not closely match that of L. pardalinum. Also, L. longiflorum does not have bright regions at or near primary and secondary constrictions. Most Q-bands do not coincide with dark Giemsa C-bands, except for the bright nucleolar and centromeric regions in L. pardalinum. All C-banded heterochromatin stains identically after SSC pretreatment, dark with Giemsa and bright with quinacrine.— The many Q-bands of varying intensity, wide distribution and constant pattern, unrelated to C-bands, may be analogous to mammalian Q-bands. Such universality is expected if Q-bands area fundamental component of chromosome architecture.     

The role of heterochromatin in centromere function

Chromatin at centromeres is distinct from the chromatin in which the remainder of the genome is assembled. Two features consistently distinguish centromeres: the presence of the histone H3 variant CENP-A and, in most organisms, the presence of heterochromatin. In fission yeast, domains of silent "heterochromatin" flank the CENP-A chromatin domain that forms a platform upon which the kinetochore is assembled. Thus, fission yeast centromeres resemble their metazoan counterparts where the kinetochore is embedded in centromeric heterochromatin. The centromeric outer repeat chromatin is underacetylated on histones H3 and H4, and methylated on lysine 9 of histone H3, which provides a binding site for the chromodomain protein Swi6 (orthologue of Heterochromatin Protein 1, HP1). The remarkable demonstration that the assembly of repressive heterochromatin is dependent on the RNA interference machinery provokes many questions about the mechanisms of this process that may be tractable in fission yeast. Heterochromatin ensures that a high density of cohesin is recruited to centromeric regions, but it could have additional roles in centromere architecture and the prevention of merotely, and it might also act as a trigger for kinetochore assembly. In addition, we discuss an epigenetic model for ensuring that CENP-A is targeted and replenished at the kinetochore domain.     

Objective analysis of centromere separation

Centromere separation sequence and premature centromere division have gained increasing interest; however, inaccuracy and subjectivity in their investigation have often been criticized. We describe a simple computerized image analysis system that makes an objective and exact staging of centromere division possible.     

HP1 links centromeric heterochromatin to centromere cohesion in mammals

Heterochromatin protein‐1 (HP1) is a key component of heterochromatin. Reminiscent of the cohesin complex which mediates sister‐chromatid cohesion, most HP1 proteins in mammalian cells are displaced from chromosome arms during mitotic entry, whereas a pool remains at the heterochromatic centromere region. The function of HP1 at mitotic centromeres remains largely elusive. Here, we show that double knockout (DKO) of HP1α and HP1γ causes defective mitosis progression and weakened centromeric cohesion. While mutating the chromoshadow domain (CSD) prevents HP1α from protecting sister‐chromatid cohesion, centromeric targeting of HP1α CSD alone is sufficient to rescue the cohesion defects in HP1 DKO cells. Interestingly, HP1‐dependent cohesion protection requires Haspin, an antagonist of the cohesin‐releasing factor Wapl. Moreover, HP1α CSD directly binds the N‐terminal region of Haspin and facilitates its centromeric localization. The need for HP1 in cohesion protection can be bypassed by centromeric targeting of Haspin or inhibiting Wapl activity. Taken together, these results reveal a redundant role for HP1α and HP1γ in the protection of centromeric cohesion through promoting Haspin localization at mitotic centromeres in mammalian cells.     

Reversible disruption of pericentric heterochromatin and centromere function by inhibiting deacetylases

Histone modifications might act to mark and maintain functional chromatin domains during both interphase and mitosis. Here we show that pericentric heterochromatin in mammalian cells is specifically responsive to prolonged treatment with deacetylase inhibitors. These defined regions relocate at the nuclear periphery and lose their properties of retaining HP1 (heterochromatin protein 1) proteins. Subsequent defects in chromosome segregation arise in mitosis. All these changes can reverse rapidly after drug removal. Our data point to a crucial role of histone underacetylation within pericentric heterochromatin regions for their association with HP1 proteins, their nuclear compartmentalization and their contribution to centromere function.     

Selective protection of specific DNA sequences in the heterochromatin of C-banded human Y chromosomes.

The molecular basis of C-banding was investigated by in situ hybridization of human Y chromosome-derived repeated sequences, DYZ1 and DYZ2, to untreated or to alkaline-treated metaphases. Autoradiography of G-banded metaphases showed that both probes hybridized to the long arm of Y. Alkaline hydrolysis significantly reduced grain number for DYZ2 (58%-82%; P less than .05) but not for DYZ1 (P greater than .05). Similar results were observed for interphase nuclei. These findings demonstrated that the heterochromatin of the long arm contains at least two repetitive DNA fractions having two different sensitivities to alkaline hydrolysis. These observations support the notion that DYZ2 maps terminally on the Yq arm and may be nonheterochromatic.     

Abnormal chromosomes and number 1 heterochromatin variants revealed in C-banded preparations from 13 bladder carcinomas

The chromosomes of 13 carcinomas of the bladder were studied in C- and G-banded preparations. Heteromorphism for the amount of centromeric heteromorphism on the no. 1 chromosomes was apparent in eight tumours, and in three of these the heteromorphism was also found in the patient's normal cells. In four tumours, there were pericentric inversions of the heterochromatic regions of one or more no. 1 chromosomes. Major structural changes involving no. 1 chromosomes appeared to have occurred in at least seven of the tumours. In addition to the high incidence of heterochromatin variants (known or presumed to be constitutional phenomena), and major structural changes involving the no. 1 chromosomes, a further feature, common to four tumours, was the presence of a heterochromatic minute.     

Sequence of centromere separation: orderly separation of multicentric chromosomes in mouse L cells

Mouse L cells have many dicentric chromosomes and one with eight centromeres. All eight centromeres behave similarly until midmetaphase when most centromeres split into two units each in apparently quick succession but out-of-phase. This premature separation leaves one or perhaps two closely located centromeres intact, which separate at late metaphase-anaphase, drawing the two chromatids to opposite poles. Such dominance of one centromere over all others, though unexplained, ensures the lack of any mitotic abnormality such as bridges or fragments. These observations show that all the centromeres are retained as functional primary constrictions except for a change in functional regulation when more than one centromere are located on a chromosome.     

Sequence of centromere separation of mitotic chromosomes in Chinese hamster

Chromosome preparations in late metaphase cells from bone marrow of colcemid treated male Chinese hamsters were used to analyse the sequence of separation of sister centromeres. Chromatids of chromosomes 2 and 1 are the first ones to separate at centromeres, followed by members of group B, D and C. Some acrocentric chromosome is always the last one to separate at the centromere. The data point to a possible correlation between the position of a centromere in the separation sequence in the genome and the amount of centromeric heterochromatin as well as relation to the phenomenon of non-disjunction.     

Metaphase arrest with centromere separation in polo mutants of Drosophila

The Drosophila gene polo encodes a conserved protein kinase known to be required to organize spindle poles and for cytokinesis. Here we report two strongly hypomorphic mutations of polo that arrest cells of the larval brain at a point in metaphase when the majority of sister kinetochores have separated by between 20-50% of the total spindle length in intact cells. In contrast, analysis of sister chromatid separation in squashed preparations of cells indicates that some 83% of sisters remain attached. This suggests the separation seen in intact cells requires the tension produced by a functional spindle. The point of arrest corresponds to the spindle integrity checkpoint; Bub1 protein and the 3F3/2 epitope are present on the separated kinetochores and the arrest is suppressed by a bub1 mutation. The mutant mitotic spindles are anastral and have assembled upon centrosomes that are associated with Centrosomin and the abnormal spindle protein (Asp), but neither with gamma-tubulin nor CP190. We discuss roles for Polo kinase in recruiting centrosomal proteins and in regulating progression through the metaphase-anaphase checkpoint.     

A possible mosaic form of delayed centromere separation and aneuploidy

Summary On average, a normal centromere separation sequence was seen in 3 neonates with trisomy 18 and in their parents. When evaluating individual mitoses, unusually late separating chromosomes 18 were found in a few cells of one of the parents in each family. A possible germline mosaicism of delayed separation in the parent may account for trisomy in the offspring.