Structural basis of the migfilin-filamin interaction and competition with integrin beta tails

A link between sites of cell adhesion and the cytoskeleton is essential for regulation of cell shape, motility, and signaling. Migfilin is a recently identified adaptor protein that localizes at cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix adhesion sites, where it is thought to provide a link to the cytoskeleton by interacting with the actin cross-linking protein filamin. Here we have used x-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and protein-protein interaction studies to investigate the molecular basis of migfilin binding to filamin. We report that the N-terminal portion of migfilin can bind all three human filamins (FLNa, -b, or -c) and that there are multiple migfilin-binding sites in FLNa. Human filamins are composed of an N-terminal actin-binding domain followed by 24 immunoglobulin-like (IgFLN) domains and we find that migfilin binds preferentially to IgFLNa21 and more weakly to IgFLNa19 and -22. The filamin-binding site in migfilin is localized between Pro(5) and Pro(19) and binds to the CD face of the IgFLNa21 beta-sandwich. This interaction is similar to the previously characterized beta 7 integrin-IgFLNa21 interaction and migfilin and integrin beta tails can compete with one another for binding to IgFLNa21. This suggests that competition between filamin ligands for common binding sites on IgFLN domains may provide a general means of modulating filamin interactions and signaling. In this specific case, displacement of integrin tails from filamin by migfilin may provide a mechanism for switching between different integrin-cytoskeleton linkages.     

The C-terminal rod 2 fragment of filamin A forms a compact structure that can be extended

Filamins are large proteins that cross-link actin filaments and connect to other cellular components. The C-terminal rod 2 region of FLNa (filamin A) mediates dimerization and interacts with several transmembrane receptors and intracellular signalling adaptors. SAXS (small-angle X-ray scattering) experiments were used to make a model of a six immunoglobulin-like domain fragment of the FLNa rod 2 (domains 16-21). This fragment had a surprising three-branched structural arrangement, where each branch was made of a tightly packed two-domain pair. Peptides derived from transmembrane receptors and intracellular signalling proteins induced a more open structure of the six domain fragment. Mutagenesis studies suggested that these changes are caused by peptides binding to the CD faces on domains 19 and 21 which displace the preceding domain A-strands (18 and 20 respectively), thus opening the individual domain pairs. A single particle cryo-EM map of a nine domain rod 2 fragment (domains 16-24), showed a relatively compact dimeric particle and confirmed the three-branched arrangement as well as the peptide-induced conformation changes. These findings reveal features of filamin structure that are important for its interactions and mechanical properties.     

Integrin binding immunoglobulin type filamin domains have variable stability

Filamin, a large modular protein composed mainly of many immunoglobulin-like domains, is a potent cross-linker of actin filaments. The region containing immunoglobulin type modules 19-21 makes up the binding site for the cytoplasmic tails of the integrin adhesion receptors. Here we investigate the stability of the Ig-like filamin domains using NMR studies over a range of pH and temperature. We show that the 21st Ig-like module (FLNa21) is partly unfolded even under physiological conditions and when attached to FLNa20. It is, however, appreciably stabilized upon binding to integrins. FLNa21 is noticeably less stable than neighboring homologous modules, such as FLNa19 and FLNa17. This variability in stability could be related to the known sensitivity of filamin to cell-mediated mechanical forces.     

Structure of three tandem filamin domains reveals auto-inhibition of ligand binding

Human filamins are large actin-crosslinking proteins composed of an N-terminal actin-binding domain followed by 24 Ig-like domains (IgFLNs), which interact with numerous transmembrane receptors and cytosolic signaling proteins. Here we report the 2.5 A resolution structure of a three-domain fragment of human filamin A (IgFLNa19-21). The structure reveals an unexpected domain arrangement, with IgFLNa20 partially unfolded bringing IgFLNa21 into close proximity to IgFLNa19. Notably the N-terminus of IgFLNa20 forms a beta-strand that associates with the CD face of IgFLNa21 and occupies the binding site for integrin adhesion receptors. Disruption of this IgFLNa20-IgFLNa21 interaction enhances filamin binding to integrin beta-tails. Structural and functional analysis of other IgFLN domains suggests that auto-inhibition by adjacent IgFLN domains may be a general mechanism controlling filamin-ligand interactions. This can explain the increased integrin binding of filamin splice variants and provides a mechanism by which ligand binding might impact filamin structure.     

Evidence for multisite ligand binding and stretching of filamin by integrin and migfilin

Filamin, a large cytoskeletal adaptor, connects plasma membrane to cytoskeleton by binding to transmembrane receptor integrin and actin. Seven of 24 filamin immunoglobulin repeats have conserved integrin binding sites, of which repeats 19 and 21 were shown to be autoinhibited by their adjacent repeats 18 and 20, respectively. Here we show using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy that the autoinhibition can be relieved by integrin or integrin regulator migfilin. We further demonstrate that repeats 19 and 21 can simultaneously engage ligands. The data suggest that filamin is mechanically stretched by integrin or migfilin via a multisite binding mechanism for regulating cytoskeleton and integrin-mediated cell adhesion.     

1H, 13C and 15N resonance assignments of the human filamin A tandem immunoglobulin-like domains 16–17 and 18–19

Filamins are large actin-binding and cross-linking proteins which act as linkers between the cytoskeleton and various signaling proteins. Filamin A (FLNa) is the most abundant of the three filamin isoforms found in humans. FLNa contains an N-terminal actin-binding domain and 24 immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domains. The Ig domains are responsible for the FLNa dimerization and most of the interactions that FLNa has with numerous other proteins. There are several crystal and solution structures from isolated single Ig domains of filamins in the PDB database, but only few from longer constructs. Here, we present nearly complete chemical shift assignments of FLNa tandem Ig domains 16–17 and 18–19. Chemical shift mapping between FLNa tandem Ig domain 16–17 and isolated domain 17 suggests a novel domain–domain interaction mode.     

Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Interacts with Multiple Immunoglobulin Domains of Filamin A

Mutations of the chloride channel cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) that impair its apical localization and function cause cystic fibrosis. A previous report has shown that filamin A (FLNa), an actin-cross-linking and -scaffolding protein, interacts directly with the cytoplasmic N terminus of CFTR and that this interaction is necessary for stability and confinement of the channel to apical membranes. Here, we report that the CFTR N terminus has sequence similarity to known FLNa-binding partner-binding sites. FLNa has 24 Ig (IgFLNa) repeats, and a CFTR peptide pulled down repeats 9, 12, 17, 19, 21, and 23, which share sequence similarity yet differ from the other FLNa Ig domains. Using known structures of IgFLNa·partner complexes as templates, we generated in silico models of IgFLNa·CFTR peptide complexes. Point and deletion mutants of IgFLNa and CFTR informed by the models, including disease-causing mutations L15P and W19C, disrupted the binding interaction. The model predicted that a P5L CFTR mutation should not affect binding, but a synthetic P5L mutant peptide had reduced solubility, suggesting a different disease-causing mechanism. Taken together with the fact that FLNa dimers are elongated (∼160 nm) strands, whereas CFTR is compact (6∼8 nm), we propose that a single FLNa molecule can scaffold multiple CFTR partners. Unlike previously defined dimeric FLNa·partner complexes, the FLNa-monomeric CFTR interaction is relatively weak, presumptively facilitating dynamic clustering of CFTR at cell membranes. Finally, we show that deletion of all CFTR interacting domains from FLNa suppresses the surface expression of CFTR on baby hamster kidney cells.     

Kindlin Binds Migfilin Tandem LIM Domains and Regulates Migfilin Focal Adhesion Localization and Recruitment Dynamics

Focal adhesions (FAs), sites of tight adhesion to the extracellular matrix, are composed of clusters of transmembrane integrin adhesion receptors and intracellular proteins that link integrins to the actin cytoskeleton and signaling pathways. Two integrin-binding proteins present in FAs, kindlin-1 and kindlin-2, are important for integrin activation, FA formation, and signaling. Migfilin, originally identified in a yeast two-hybrid screen for kindlin-2-interacting proteins, is a LIM domain-containing adaptor protein found in FAs and implicated in control of cell adhesion, spreading, and migration. By binding filamin, migfilin provides a link between kindlin and the actin cytoskeleton. Here, using a combination of kindlin knockdown, biochemical pulldown assays, fluorescence microscopy, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), we have established that the C-terminal LIM domains of migfilin dictate its FA localization, shown that these domains mediate an interaction with kindlin in vitro and in cells, and demonstrated that kindlin is important for normal migfilin dynamics in cells. We also show that when the C-terminal LIM domain region is deleted, then the N-terminal filamin-binding region of the protein, which is capable of targeting migfilin to actin-rich stress fibers, is the predominant driver of migfilin localization. Our work details a correlation between migfilin domains that drive kindlin binding and those that drive FA localization as well as a kindlin dependence on migfilin FA recruitment and mobility. We therefore suggest that the kindlin interaction with migfilin LIM domains drives migfilin FA recruitment, localization, and mobility.     

Identification and Characterization of Multiple Similar Ligand-binding Repeats in Filamin: IMPLICATION ON FILAMIN-MEDIATED RECEPTOR CLUSTERING AND CROSS-TALK*

The actin-binding protein filamin links membrane receptors to the underlying cytoskeleton. The cytoplasmic domains of these membrane receptors have been shown to bind to various filamin immunoglobulin repeats. Notably, among 24 human filamin repeats, repeat 17 was reported to specifically bind to platelet receptor glycoprotein Ibα and repeat 21 to integrins. However, a complete sequence alignment of all 24 human filamin repeats reveals that repeats 17 and 21 actually belong to a distinct filamin repeat subgroup (containing repeats 4, 9, 12, 17, 19, 21, and 23) that shares a conserved ligand-binding site. Using isothermal calorimetry and NMR analyses, we show that all repeats in this subgroup can actually bind glycoprotein Ibα, integrins, and a cytoskeleton regulator migfilin in similar manners. These data provide a new view on the ligand specificity of the filamin repeats. They also suggest a multiple ligand binding mechanism where similar repeats within a filamin monomer may promote receptor clustering or receptor cross-talking for regulation of the cytoskeleton organization and diverse filamin-mediated cellular activities.     

Migfilin and Mig-2 link focal adhesions to filamin and the actin cytoskeleton and function in cell shape modulation

Cell-extracellular matrix adhesion is an important determinant of cell morphology. We show here that migfilin, a LIM-containing protein, localizes to cell-matrix adhesions, associates with actin filaments, and is essential for cell shape modulation. Migfilin interacts with the cell-matrix adhesion protein Mig-2 (mitogen inducible gene-2), a mammalian homolog of UNC-112, and the actin binding protein filamin through its C- and N-terminal domains, respectively. Loss of Mig-2 or migfilin impairs cell shape modulation. Mig-2 recruits migfilin to cell-matrix adhesions, while the interaction with filamin mediates the association of migfilin with actin filaments. Migfilin therefore functions as an important scaffold at cell-matrix adhesions. Together, Mig-2, migfilin and filamin define a connection between cell matrix adhesions and the actin cytoskeleton and participate in the orchestration of actin assembly and cell shape modulation.     

Migfilin and filamin as regulators of integrin activation in endothelial cells and neutrophils

Cell adhesion and migration depend on engagement of extracellular matrix ligands by integrins. Integrin activation is dynamically regulated by interactions of various cytoplasmic proteins, such as filamin and integrin activators, talin and kindlin, with the cytoplasmic tail of the integrin β subunit. Although filamin has been suggested to be an inhibitor of integrin activation, direct functional evidence for the inhibitory role of filamin is limited. Migfilin, a filamin-binding protein enriched at cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix contact sites, can displace filamin from β1 and β3 integrins and promote integrin activation. However, its role in activation and functions of different β integrins in human vascular cells is unknown. In this study, using flow cytometry, we demonstrate that filamin inhibits β1 and αIIbβ3 integrin activation, and migfilin can overcome its inhibitory effect. Migfilin protein is widely expressed in different adherent and circulating blood cells and can regulate integrin activation in naturally-occurring vascular cells, endothelial cells and neutrophils. Migfilin can activate β1, β2 and β3 integrins and promote integrin mediated responses while migfilin depletion impairs the spreading and migration of endothelial cells. Thus, filamin can act broadly as an inhibitor and migfilin is a promoter of integrin activation.     

Crystal structure of human filamin C domain 23 and small angle scattering model for filamin C 23-24 dimer

Filamin C is a dimeric, actin-binding protein involved in organization of cortical cytoskeleton and of the sarcomere. We performed crystallographic, small-angle X-ray scattering and analytical ultracentrifugation experiments on the constructs containing carboxy-terminal domains of the protein (domains 23-24 and 19-21). The crystal structure of domain 23 of filamin C showed that the protein adopts the expected immunoglobulin (Ig)-like fold. Small-angle X-ray scattering experiments performed on filamin C tandem Ig-like domains 23 and 24 reveal a dimer that is formed by domain 24 and that domain 23 has little interactions with itself or with domain 24, while the analytical ultracentrifugation experiments showed that the filamin C domains 19-21 form elongated monomers in diluted solutions.     

Atomic Structures of Two Novel Immunoglobulin-like Domain Pairs in the Actin Cross-linking Protein Filamin

Filamins are actin filament cross-linking proteins composed of an N-terminal actin-binding domain and 24 immunoglobulin-like domains (IgFLNs). Filamins interact with numerous proteins, including the cytoplasmic domains of plasma membrane signaling and cell adhesion receptors. Thereby filamins mechanically and functionally link the cell membrane to the cytoskeleton. Most of the interactions have been mapped to the C-terminal IgFLNs 16–24. Similarly, as with the previously known compact domain pair of IgFLNa20–21, the two-domain fragments IgFLNa16–17 and IgFLNa18–19 were more compact in small angle x-ray scattering analysis than would be expected for two independent domains. Solution state NMR structures revealed that the domain packing in IgFLNa18–19 resembles the structure of IgFLNa20–21. In both domain pairs the integrin-binding site is masked, although the details of the domain-domain interaction are partly distinct. The structure of IgFLNa16–17 revealed a new domain packing mode where the adhesion receptor binding site of domain 17 is not masked. Sequence comparison suggests that similar packing of three tandem filamin domain pairs is present throughout the animal kingdom, and we propose that this packing is involved in the regulation of filamin interactions through a mechanosensor mechanism.Actin cytoskeleton is a dynamic network that is involved in many fundamental cellular processes such as cell differentiation, morphology, endocytosis, exocytosis, cytokinesis, and cell movement. These events are regulated by proteins that interact with monomeric and filamentous actin. Filamins are actin filament-binding and cross-linking proteins. Filamin A and filamin B are both ubiquitously expressed, and their mutations in human patients cause developmental abnormalities in brain, cartilage, bones, and epithelial tissues (1). Filamin C is muscle-specific, and mutations thereof cause myofibrillar myopathy (2). Mice with targeted deletion of any of the filamin genes die either during development or soon after birth (3–6). These phenotypes are thought to reflect the roles of filamins as scaffolds of signaling pathways required for cell differentiation, regulators of cell migration, and stabilizers of cytoskeleton and cell membranes (1, 7).Filamins bind to actin filaments mainly via their N-terminal actin-binding domains and interact with other proteins via the 24 filamin type immunoglobulin-like domains (IgFLN),³ also called filamin repeats (8). Especially the C-terminal IgFLNs 16–24 contain several protein-protein interaction sites (1). Our previous structural studies have revealed that many proteins interact with filamins by forming an additional β-strand next to strand C of an individual IgFLN. The platelet von Willebrand factor receptor, glycoprotein (GP) Ibα, interacts in this way with IgFLNa17 (9). The integrin family adhesion receptor β subunits interact with IgFLNa21 and to a lesser extent with IgFLNa19 (10, 11). Furthermore, some signaling proteins use a similar interaction mode: the adaptor protein migfilin interacts with IgFLNa21 (12), and the Rho family GTPase-activating protein FilGAP interacts with IgFLNa23 (13, 14).Although structural details are known from many filamin interactions, it is not completely clear how these interactions are regulated. In some cases the regulation involves competition between multiple binding partners (10, 11). Alternative splicing (15), proteolysis of filamin (16–18), and ligand phosphorylation (11) also contribute to the regulation. Recently, it has become apparent that conformational changes in filamins may also be involved. For instance, actomyosin contraction exposes hidden cysteine residues in filamins (19). This opens the possibility that forces transmitted through actin filament may open up binding sites, and filamin may thus be involved in mechanosensor signaling.We have recently found a structural mechanism by which mechanical forces could regulate interactions at the C-terminal part of filamin. Our recent crystal structure revealed that IgFLNa20 forms a compact pair with IgFLNa21, and in this pair the N-terminal part of IgFLNa20 masks the integrin-binding site on IgFLNa21 (15). It is possible that this masking could be released by mechanical forces. Four lines of evidence led us to hypothesize that in addition to the IgFLNa20–21 pair, other similar domain pairs could exist at the C terminus of filamin: (i) the overall structure of the C-terminal part (IgFLNs 16–24) of filamin is relatively more compact than the N-terminal part of the molecule (IgFLNs 1–15) (8); (ii) the N-terminal sequences of even-numbered domains 16, 18, and 20 differ from other IgFLNs (20) (sequence alignment is shown in supplemental Fig. S1); (iii) in single-domain solution NMR structures of IgFLNc16, IgFLNb16, 18, and 20, the N-terminal part is not folded with the rest of the domain; and (iv) according to biochemical experiments, IgFLNa18 masks integrin binding to IgFLNa19 (15). We report here small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) analysis showing that IgFLNa16–17 and 18–19 have overall dimensions very similar to those of the previously known domain pair IgFLNa20–21. The IgFLNa22–23 construct was much more elongated, which is indicative for two independently folded noninteracting domains. Further, the atomic structures solved with NMR spectroscopy show that IgFLNa18–19 forms a pair similar to IgFLNa20–21, but the details of the interaction and orientation of the domains differ. On the other hand, IgFLNa16–17 forms an entirely novel type of domain pair. Sequence comparisons predict that these three interdependent domain pairs are conserved from nematodes to vertebrates, suggesting that the arrangement has special regulatory functions.     

A Structural Portrait of the PDZ Domain Family

PDZ (PSD-95/Discs-large/ZO1) domains are interaction modules that typically bind to specific C-terminal sequences of partner proteins and assemble signaling complexes in multicellular organisms. We have analyzed the existing database of PDZ domain structures in the context of a specificity tree based on binding specificities defined by peptide-phage binding selections. We have identified 16 structures of PDZ domains in complex with high-affinity ligands and have elucidated four additional structures to assemble a structural database that covers most of the branches of the PDZ specificity tree. A detailed comparison of the structures reveals features that are responsible for the diverse specificities across the PDZ domain family. Specificity differences can be explained by differences in PDZ residues that are in contact with the peptide ligands, but these contacts involve both side-chain and main-chain interactions. Most PDZ domains bind peptides in a canonical conformation in which the ligand main chain adopts an extended β-strand conformation by interacting in an antiparallel fashion with a PDZ β-strand. However, a subset of PDZ domains bind peptides with a bent main-chain conformation and the specificities of these non-canonical domains could not be explained based on canonical structures. Our analysis provides a structural portrait of the PDZ domain family, which serves as a guide in understanding the structural basis for the diverse specificities across the family.     

Differential mechanical stability of filamin A rod segments

Prompted by recent reports suggesting that interaction of filamin A (FLNa) with its binding partners is regulated by mechanical force, we examined mechanical properties of FLNa domains using magnetic tweezers. FLNa, an actin cross-linking protein, consists of two subunits that dimerize through a C-terminal self-association domain. Each subunit contains an N-terminal spectrin-related actin-binding domain followed by 24 immunoglobulinlike (Ig) repeats. The Ig repeats in the rod 1 segment (repeats 1–15) are arranged as a linear array, whereas rod 2 (repeats 16–23) is more compact due to interdomain interactions. In the rod 1 segment, repeats 9–15 augment F-actin binding to a much greater extent than do repeats 1–8. Here, we report that the three segments are unfolded at different forces under the same loading rate. Remarkably, we found that repeats 16–23 are susceptible to forces of ∼10 pN or even less, whereas the repeats in the rod 1 segment can withstand significantly higher forces. The differential force response of FLNa Ig domains has broad implications, since these domains not only support the tension of actin network but also interact with many transmembrane and signaling proteins, mostly in the rod 2 segment. In particular, our finding of unfolding of repeats 16–23 at ∼10 pN or less is consistent with the hypothesized force-sensing function of the rod 2 segment in FLNa.     

Filamins Regulate Cell Spreading and Initiation of Cell Migration

Mammalian filamins (FLNs) are a family of three large actin-binding proteins. FLNa, the founding member of the family, was implicated in migration by cell biological analyses and the identification of FLNA mutations in the neuronal migration disorder periventricular heterotopia. However, recent knockout studies have questioned the relevance of FLNa to cell migration. Here we have used shRNA-mediated knockdown of FLNa, FLNb or FLNa and FLNb, or, alternatively, acute proteasomal degradation of all three FLNs, to generate FLN-deficient cells and assess their ability to migrate. We report that loss of FLNa or FLNb has little effect on migration but that knockdown of FLNa and FLNb, or proteolysis of all three FLNs, impairs migration. The observed defect is primarily a deficiency in initiation of motility rather than a problem with maintenance of locomotion speed. FLN-deficient cells are also impaired in spreading. Re-expression of full length FLNa, but not re-expression of a mutated FLNa lacking immunoglobulin domains 19 to 21, reverts both the spreading and the inhibition of initiation of migration.Our results establish a role for FLNs in cell migration and spreading and suggest that compensation by other FLNs may mask phenotypes in single knockout or knockdown cells. We propose that interactions between FLNs and transmembrane or signalling proteins, mediated at least in part by immunoglobulin domains 19 to 21 are important for both cell spreading and initiation of migration.     

Migfilin, a Molecular Switch in Regulation of Integrin Activation

The linkage of heterodimeric (α/β) integrin receptors with their extracellular matrix ligands and intracellular actin cytoskeleton is a fundamental step for controlling cell adhesion and migration. Binding of the actin-linking protein, talin, to integrin β cytoplasmic tails (CTs) induces high affinity ligand binding (integrin activation), whereas binding of another actin-linking protein, filamin, to the integrin β CTs negatively regulates this process by blocking the talin-integrin interaction. Here we show structurally that migfilin, a novel cytoskeletal adaptor highly enriched in the integrin adhesion sites, strongly interacts with the same region in filamin where integrin β CTs bind. We further demonstrate that the migfilin interaction dissociates filamin from integrin and promotes the talin/integrin binding and integrin activation. Migfilin thus acts as a molecular switch to disconnect filamin from integrin for regulating integrin activation and dynamics of extracellular matrix-actin linkage.Cells reside in a protein network, the extracellular matrix (ECM).⁴ Cell-ECM contact is crucial for many physiological and pathophysiological processes and is primarily mediated by heterodimeric (α/β) transmembrane receptors, the integrins (1). Integrins engage a variety of ECM proteins via their extracellular domains while connecting to the actin cytoskeleton via their small cytoplasmic tails (CTs). The ability of integrins to bind to their ligands is uniquely controlled by the integrin CTs via a process called “inside-out signaling,” i.e. upon cellular stimulation, an integrin, typically expressed in a latent state, can receive intracellular signal(s) at its CT, which transmits through the transmembrane domain to the extracellular domain thereby converting the receptor from a low to a high affinity state (integrin activation). How such long range information transfer is initiated and regulated has been the central topic of integrin/cell adhesion research over the decades (for reviews see Refs. 2-5). Structural/biochemical studies have indicated that the inside-out signaling involves the unclasping of the integrin α/β CT complex (6-9), followed by extensive rearrangement of transmembrane domain and extracellular domain (10-13). Talin, a large actin-linking protein, was found to play a key role in the unclasping process by binding to the integrin β CTs (7-8, 14). Talin activity appears to be controlled by multiple factors or pathways (15-20).Relevant to this study is the role of filamin, another major actin cross-linking protein (21-22), in integrin activation. Filamin was found to share an overlapping binding site on integrin β CTs with talin and thus suppress the talin-integrin interaction (16). Gene silencing of filamin in various cell lines to remove the filamin-integrin connection enhances integrin activation (16, 23), whereas increased filamin-integrin interaction inhibits cell migration (24), a process critically dependent on integrin activation. Together these observations support the notion that filamin binding to integrin serves as a cellular brake to control the dynamics of the integrin activation by inhibiting talin function and ECM-cytoskeleton communication. The mechanism as to how the filamin brake is turned off to promote integrin activation and cell migration is not understood.Filamin is known to contain an N-terminal actin binding domain (ABD) and a long rod-like domain of 24 immunoglobulin-like repeats, of which repeat 21 (IgFLN21) was shown to play a key role in binding to integrin β CTs and blocking the talin-integrin β CT interaction (16). Interestingly, IgFLN21 also recognizes another intracellular protein called migfilin, which has been shown to be an important regulator of integrin-mediated cytoskeletal rearrangements, cell shape change (25), and cell migration (26).In an effort to dissect the complex intermolecular interactions between migfilin, filamin, and integrin, we have undertaken a detailed structural/functional analysis. Using NMR spectroscopy, we have mapped the precise IgFLN21 binding region in migfilin, which is located at the extreme N terminus (residues 1-24) of migfilin (migfilin-N), and we solved solution structure of the IgFLN21-migfilin-N complex. To our surprise, despite little sequence homology, migfilin binds to the same region in IgFLN21 where integrin β CT binds. Detailed NMR and biochemical analyses demonstrate that the migfilin-filamin interaction is an order of magnitude higher than the integrin-filamin interaction and that the migfilin binding to filamin can competitively dissociate filamin from integrin and thus promote the talin-integrin interaction. Using multiple functional approaches, we further show that migfilin, but not its filamin binding defective mutant, significantly enhances integrin activation. These data suggest a novel regulatory pathway in which the binding of filamin to its downstream target migfilin switches off the integrin-filamin connection, thereby promoting talin binding to and activation of integrins.     

Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) Regulates α5β1 Integrin Activation State in Human Cancer Cell Lines through the p90RSK-dependent Phosphorylation of Filamin A

Cell adhesion, motility, and invasion are regulated by the ligand-binding activity of integrin receptors, transmembrane proteins that bind to the extracellular matrix. Integrins whose conformation allows for ligand binding and appropriate functional activity are said to be in an active state. Integrin activation and subsequent ligand binding are dynamically regulated by the association of cytoplasmic proteins with integrin intracellular domains. In this study, we evaluated the role of EGF in the regulation of the activation state of the α5β1 integrin receptor for fibronectin. The addition of EGF to either A431 squamous carcinoma cells or DiFi colon cancer cells resulted in loss of α5β1-dependent adhesion to fibronectin but no loss of integrin from the cell surface. EGF activated the EGF receptor/ERK/p90RSK and Rho/Rho kinase signaling pathways. Blocking either pathway inhibited EGF-mediated loss of adhesion, suggesting that they work in parallel to regulate integrin function. EGF treatment also resulted in phosphorylation of filamin A (FLNa), which binds and inactivates β1 integrins. EGF-mediated FLNa phosphorylation was completely blocked by an inhibitor of p90RSK and partially attenuated by an inhibitor of Rho kinase, suggesting that both pathways converge on FLNa to regulate integrin function. A431 clonal cell lines expressing non-phosphorylated dominant-negative FLNa were resistant to the inhibitory effects of EGF on integrin function, whereas clonal cell lines overexpressing wild-type FLNa were more sensitive to the inhibitory effect of EGF. These data suggest that EGF-dependent inactivation of α5β1 integrin is regulated through FLNa phosphorylation and cellular contractility.     

Solution structure of the soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE)

The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a multiligand cell surface receptor involved in various human diseases, as it binds to numerous molecules and proteins that modulate the activity of other proteins. Elucidating the three-dimensional structure of this receptor is therefore most important for understanding its function during activation and cellular signaling. The major alternative splice product of RAGE comprises its extracellular region that occurs as a soluble protein (sRAGE). Although the structures of sRAGE domains were available, their assembly into the functional full-length protein remained unknown. We observed that the protein has concentration-dependent oligomerization behavior, and this is also mediated by the presence of Ca(2+) ions. Moreover, using synchrotron small angle x-ray scattering, the solution structure of human sRAGE was determined in the monomeric and dimeric forms. The model for the monomer displays a J-like shape, whereas the dimer is formed through the association of the two N-terminal domains and has an elongated structure. These results provide insights into the assembly of the RAGE homodimer, which is essential for signal transduction, and the sRAGE:RAGE heterodimer that leads to blockage of the receptor signaling, paving the way for the design of therapeutic strategies for a large number of different pathologies.