The activation mechanism of chemokine receptor CCR5 involves common structural changes but a different network of interhelical interactions relative to rhodopsin

In G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the interaction between the cytosolic ends of transmembrane helix 3 (TM3) and TM6 was shown to play an important role in the transition from inactive to active states. According to the currently prevailing model, constructed for rhodopsin and structurally related receptors, the arginine of the conserved "DRY" motif located at the cytosolic end of TM3 (R3.50) would interact with acidic residues in TM3 (D/E3.49) and TM6 (D/E6.30) at the resting state and shift out of this polar pocket upon agonist stimulation. However, 30% of GPCRs, including all chemokine receptors, contain a positively charged residue at position 6.30 which does not support an interaction with R3.50. We have investigated the role of R6.30 in this receptor family by using CCR5 as a model. R6.30D and R6.30E substitutions, which allow an ionic interaction with R3.50, resulted in an almost silent receptor devoid of constitutive activity and strongly impaired in its ability to bind chemokines but still able to internalize. R6.30A and R6.30Q substitutions, allowing weaker interactions with R3.50, preserved chemokine binding but reduced the constitutive activity and the functional response to chemokines. These results indicate that the constitutive and ligand-promoted activity of CCR5 can be modified by modulating the interaction between the DRY motif in TM3 and residues in TM6 suggesting that the overall structure and activation mechanism are well conserved in GPCRs. However, the molecular interactions locking the inactive state must be different in receptors devoid of D/E6.30.     

Functional role of the "ionic lock"--an interhelical hydrogen-bond network in family A heptahelical receptors

Activation of family A G-protein-coupled receptors involves a rearrangement of a conserved interhelical cytoplasmic hydrogen bond network between the E(D)RY motif on transmembrane helix 3 (H3) and residues on H6, which is commonly termed the cytoplasmic “ionic lock.” Glu134^3.49 of the E(D)RY motif also forms an intrahelical salt bridge with neighboring Arg135^3.50 in the dark-state crystal structure of rhodopsin. We examined the roles of Glu134^3.49 and Arg135^3.50 on H3 and Glu247^6.30 and Glu249^6.32 on H6 on the activation of rhodopsin using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of wild-type and mutant pigments reconstituted into lipid membranes. Activation of rhodopsin is pH-dependent with proton uptake during the transition from the inactive Meta I to the active Meta II state. Glu134^3.49 of the ERY motif is identified as the proton-accepting group, using the Fourier transform infrared protonation signature and the absence of a pH dependence of activation in the E134Q mutant. Neutralization of Arg135^3.50 similarly leads to pH-independent receptor activation, but with structural alterations in the Meta II state. Neutralization of Glu247^6.30 and Glu249^6.32 on H6, which are involved in interhelical interactions with H3 and H7, respectively, led to a shift toward Meta II in the E247Q and E249Q mutants while retaining the pH sensitivity of the equilibrium. Disruption of the interhelical interaction of Glu247^6.30 and Glu249^6.32 on H6 with H3 and H7 plays its role during receptor activation, but neutralization of the intrahelical salt bridge between Glu134^3.49 and Arg135^3.50 is considerably more critical for shifting the photoproduct equilibrium to the active conformation. These conclusions are discussed in the context of recent structural data of the β₂-adrenergic receptor.     

Acid-base equilibria in rhodopsin: dependence of the protonation state of glu134 on its environment

Glutamic acid E134 in rhodopsin is part of a highly conserved triad, D(E)RY, located near the cytoplasmic lipid/water interface in transmembrane helix 3 of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A large body of experimental evidence suggests that the protonation of E134 plays a role in the mechanism of activation of rhodopsin and other GPCRs as well. For E134 to change its protonation state, its pK(a) value must shift from values below physiological pH to higher values. Because of the proximity of the triad to the lipid/water interface, it was hypothesized that a change in solvent around E134 from water to lipid could induce such a shift in pK(a). To test this hypothesis, the pK(a) values of the titratable amino acid residues in rhodopsin have been calculated and the change in solvent around E134 was modeled by shifting the position of the lipid/water interface. The approach used to carry out the pK(a) calculations takes into account the partial immersion of transmembrane proteins in lipid. Qualitative experimental evidence is available for several residues regarding their likely protonation state in rhodopsin at or near physiological pH. Comparison of the calculated pK(a) values with these experimental findings shows good agreement between the two. Notably, glutamic acids E122 and E181 were found to be protonated. The pK(a) values were then calculated for a range of lipid/water interface positions. Although the surrounding solvent of several titratable residues changed from water to lipid in this range, leading to pK(a) shifts in most cases, only for E134 would the shift lead to a change in protonation state at physiological pH. Thus, our results show that the protonation state of E134 is particularly sensitive to its environment. This sensitivity together with the location of E134 near the actual position of the lipid/water interface could be a strategic element in the mechanism of activation of rhodopsin.     

NMR structure of the second intracellular loop of the alpha 2A adrenergic receptor: evidence for a novel cytoplasmic helix

A major, unresolved question in signal transduction by G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is to understand how, at atomic resolution, a GPCR activates a G protein. A step toward answering this question was made with the determination of the high-resolution structure of rhodopsin; we now know the intramolecular interactions that characterize the resting conformation of a GPCR. To what degree does this structure represent a structural paradigm for other GPCRs, especially at the cytoplasmic surface where GPCR-G protein interaction occurs and where the sequence homology is low among GPCRs? To address this question, we performed NMR studies on approximately 35-residue-long peptides including the critical second intracellular loop (i2) of the alpha 2A adrenergic receptor (AR) and of rhodopsin. To stabilize the secondary structure of the peptide termini, 4-12 residues from the adjacent transmembrane helices were included and structures determined in dodecylphosphocholine micelles. We also characterized the effects on an alpha 2A AR peptide of a D130I mutation in the conserved DRY motif. Our results show that in contrast to the L-shaped loop in the i2 of rhodopsin, the i2 of the alpha 2A AR is predominantly helical, supporting the hypothesis that there is structural diversity within GPCR intracellular loops. The D130I mutation subtly modulates the helical structure. The spacing of nonpolar residues in i2 with helical periodicity is a predictor of helical versus loop structure. These data should lead to more accurate models of the intracellular surface of GPCRs and of receptor-mediated G protein activation.     

A model for how Gβγ couples Gα to GPCR

Representing ∼5% of the human genome, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a primary target for drug discovery; however, the molecular details of how they couple to heterotrimeric G protein subunits are incompletely understood. Here, I propose a hypothetical initial docking model for the encounter between GPCR and Gβγ that is defined by transient interactions between the cytosolic surface of the GPCR and the prenyl moiety and the tripeptide motif, asparagine–proline–phenylalanine (NPF), in the C-terminus of the Gγ subunit. Analysis of class A GPCRs reveals a conserved NPF binding site formed by the interaction of the TM1 and H8. Functional studies using differentially prenylated proteins and peptides further suggest that the intracellular hydrophobic core of the GPCR is a prenyl binding site. Upon binding TM1 and H8 of GPCRs, the propensity of the C-terminal region of Gγ to convert into an α helix allows it to extend into the hydrophobic core of the GPCR, facilitating the GPCR active state. Conservation of the NPF motif in Gγ isoforms and interacting residues in TM1 and H8 suggest that this is a general mechanism of GPCR–G protein signaling. Analysis of the rhodopsin dimer also suggests that Gγ–rhodopsin interactions may facilitate GPCR dimer transactivation.     

3D modeling of the activated states of constitutively active mutants of rhodopsin

The activated (R*) states in constitutively active mutants (CAMs) of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are presumably characterized by lower energies than the resting (R) states. If specific configurations of TM helices differing by rotations along the long transmembrane axes possess energies lower than that in the R state for pronounced CAMs, but not for non-CAMs, these particular configurations of TM helices are candidate 3D models for the R* state. The hypothesis was studied in the case of rhodopsin, the only GPCR for which experimentally determined 3D models of the R and R* states are currently available. Indeed, relative energies of the R* state were significantly lower than that of the R state for the rhodopsin mutants G90D/M257Y and E113Q/M257Y (strong CAMs), but not for G90D, E113Q, and M257Y (not CAMs). Next, the developed build-up procedure successfully identified few similar configurations of the TM helical bundle of G90D/M257Y and E113Q/M257Y as possible candidates for the 3D model of the R* state of rhodopsin, all of them being in good agreement with the model suggested by experiment. Since constitutively active mutants are known for many of GPCRs belonging to the large rhodopsin-like family, this approach provides a way for predicting possible 3D structures corresponding to the activated states of the TM regions of many GPCRs for which CAMs have been identified.     

Asp83, Glu113 and Glu134 are not specifically involved in Schiff base protonation or wavelength regulation in bovine rhodopsin

Site-specific mutagenesis was employed to investigate the proposed contribution of proton-donating residues (Glu, Asp) in the membrane domains of bovine rhodopsin to protonation of the Schiff base-linking protein and chromophore or to wavelength modulation of this visual pigment. Three point-mutations were introduced to replace the highly conserved residues Asp83 by Asn (D83N), Glu113 by Gln (E113 Q) or Glu134 by Asp (E134D), respectively. All 3 substitutions had only marginal effects on the spectral properties of the final pigment (less than or equal to 3 nm blue-shift relative to native rhodopsin). Hence, none of these residues by itself is specifically involved in Schiff base protonation or wavelength modulation of bovine rhodopsin.     

Detection of G Protein-selective G Protein-coupled Receptor (GPCR) Conformations in Live Cells

Although several recent studies have reported that GPCRs adopt multiple conformations, it remains unclear how subtle conformational changes are translated into divergent downstream responses. In this study, we report on a novel class of FRET-based sensors that can detect the ligand/mutagenic stabilization of GPCR conformations that promote interactions with G proteins in live cells. These sensors rely on the well characterized interaction between a GPCR and the C terminus of a Gα subunit. We use these sensors to elucidate the influence of the highly conserved (E/D)RY motif on GPCR conformation. Specifically, Glu/Asp but not Arg mutants of the (E/D)RY motif are known to enhance basal GPCR signaling. Hence, it is unclear whether ionic interactions formed by the (E/D)RY motif (ionic lock) are necessary to stabilize basal GPCR states. We find that mutagenesis of the β2-AR (E/D)RY ionic lock enhances interaction with G_s. However, only Glu/Asp but not Arg mutants increase G protein activation. In contrast, mutagenesis of the opsin (E/D)RY ionic lock does not alter its interaction with transducin. Instead, opsin-specific ionic interactions centered on residue Lys-296 are both necessary and sufficient to promote interactions with transducin. Effective suppression of β2-AR basal activity by inverse agonist ICI 118,551 requires ionic interactions formed by the (E/D)RY motif. In contrast, the inverse agonist metoprolol suppresses interactions with G_s and promotes G_i binding, with concomitant pertussis toxin-sensitive inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity. Taken together, these studies validate the use of the new FRET sensors while revealing distinct structural mechanisms for ligand-dependent GPCR function.     

Novel approach to computer modeling of seven-helical transmembrane proteins: current progress in the test case of bacteriorhodopsin.

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are thought to be proteins with 7-membered transmembrane helical bundles (7TM proteins). Recently, the X-ray structures have been solved for two such proteins, namely for bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and rhodopsin (Rh), the latter being a GPCR. Despite similarities, the structures are different enough to suggest that 3D models for different GPCRs cannot be obtained directly employing 3D structures of BR or Rh as a unique template. The approach to computer modeling of 7TM proteins developed in this work was capable of reproducing the experimental X-ray structure of BR with great accuracy. A combination of helical packing and low-energy conformers for loops most close to the X-ray structure possesses the r.m.s.d. value of 3.13 A. Such a level of accuracy for the 3D-structure prediction for a 216-residue protein has not been achieved, so far, by any available ab initio procedure of protein folding. The approach may produce also other energetically consistent combinations of helical bundles and loop conformers, creating a variety of possible templates for 3D structures of 7TM proteins, including GPCRs. These templates may provide experimentalists with various plausible options for 3D structure of a given GPCR; in our view, only experiments will determine the final choice of the most reasonable 3D template.     

Construction of a sequence motif characteristic of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors

An approach to discover sequence patterns characteristic of ligand classes is described and applied to aminergic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Putative ligand-binding residue positions were inferred from considering three lines of evidence: conservation in the subfamily absent or underrepresented in the superfamily, any available mutation data, and the physicochemical properties of the ligand. For aminergic GPCRs, the motif is composed of a conserved aspartic acid in the third transmembrane (TM) domain (rhodopsin position 117) and a conserved tryptophan in the seventh TM domain (rhodopsin position 293); the roles of each are readily justified by molecular modeling of ligand-receptor interactions. This minimally defined motif is an appropriate computational tool for identifying additional, potentially novel aminergic GPCRs from a set of experimentally uncharacterized "orphan" GPCRs, complementing existing sequence matching, clustering, and machine-learning techniques. Motif sensitivity stems from the stepwise addition of residues characteristic of an entire class of ligand (and not tailored for any particular biogenic amine). This sensitivity is balanced by careful consideration of residues (evidence drawn from mutation data, correlation of ligand properties to residue properties, and location with respect to the extracellular face), thereby maintaining specificity for the aminergic class. A number of orphan GPCRs assigned to the aminergic class by this motif were later discovered to be a novel subfamily of trace amine GPCRs, as well as the successful classification of the histamine H4 receptor.     

Active state-like conformational elements in the beta2-AR and a photoactivated intermediate of rhodopsin identified by dynamic properties of GPCRs

G-Protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) adopt various functionally relevant conformational states in cell signaling processes. Recently determined crystal structures of rhodopsin and the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (beta 2-AR) offer insight into previously uncharacterized active conformations, but the molecular states of these GPCRs are likely to contain both inactive and active-like conformational elements. We have identified conformational rearrangements in the dynamics of the TM7-HX8 segment that relate to the properties of the conserved NPxxY(x)5,6F motif and show that they can be used to identify active state-like conformational elements in the corresponding regions of the new structures of rhodopsin and the beta 2-AR.     

Lipid Protein Interactions Couple Protonation to Conformation in a Conserved Cytosolic Domain of G Protein-coupled Receptors

The visual photoreceptor rhodopsin is a prototypical class I (rhodopsin-like) G protein-coupled receptor. Photoisomerization of the covalently bound ligand 11-cis-retinal leads to restructuring of the cytosolic face of rhodopsin. The ensuing protonation of Glu-134 in the class-conserved D(E)RY motif at the C-terminal end of transmembrane helix-3 promotes the formation of the G protein-activating state. Using transmembrane segments derived from helix-3 of bovine rhodopsin, we show that lipid protein interactions play a key role in this cytosolic “proton switch.” Infrared and fluorescence spectroscopic pK_a determinations reveal that the D(E)RY motif is an autonomous functional module coupling side chain neutralization to conformation and helix positioning as evidenced by side chain to lipid headgroup Foerster resonance energy transfer. The free enthalpies of helix stabilization and hydrophobic burial of the neutral carboxyl shift the side chain pK_a into the range typical of Glu-134 in photoactivated rhodopsin. The lipid-mediated coupling mechanism is independent of interhelical contacts allowing its conservation without interference with the diversity of ligand-specific interactions in class I G protein-coupled receptors.G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)² are hepta-helical membrane proteins that couple a large variety of extracellular signals to cell-specific responses via activation of G proteins. In the visual photoreceptor rhodopsin, a prototypical class I GPCR (1, 2), molecular activation processes can be monitored in real time by spectroscopic assays and analyzed in the context of several crystal structures (3–8). The primary signal for rhodopsin is the 11-cis to all-trans photoisomerization of retinal covalently bound to the apoprotein opsin through a protonated Schiff base to Lys²⁹⁶. Current models converge toward a picture in which “microdomains” act as conformational switches that are coupled to different degrees to the primary activation process. Two activating “proton switches” have been identified (9) as follows: breakage of an intramolecular salt bridge (10) by transfer of the Schiff base proton to its counter ion Glu-113 (11) is followed by movement of helix-6 (H6) (12, 13) in the metarhodopsin II_a (MII_a) to MII_b transition. The MII_b state takes up a proton at Glu-134 (14) in the class-conserved D(E)RY motif at the C-terminal end of helix-3 (H3) leading to the MII_bH⁺ intermediate (15, 16), which activates transducin (G_t), the G protein of the photoreceptor cell. Glu-134 regulates the pH sensitivity of receptor signaling (17) in membranes as reviewed previously (18), and in complex with G_t the protonated state of the carboxyl group becomes stabilized (19). This charge alteration is linked to the release of an “ionic lock,” originally described for the β₂-adrenergic receptor (20), which also in rhodopsin stabilizes the inactive state (16) through interactions between the cytosolic ends of H3 and H6 (21).In the absence of a lipidic bilayer, proton uptake and H6 movement become uncoupled (15). Lipidic composition affects MII formation, rhodopsin structure, and oligomerization (22–24) and differs at the rhodopsin membrane interface from the bulk lipidic phase (25). Likewise, MII formation specifically affects lipid structure (26). Although of fundamental importance for GPCR activation, the potential implication of lipid protein interactions in “proton switching” is not clear. A functional role of Glu-134 in lipid interactions has been originally derived from IR spectra where E134Q replacement abolished changes of lipid headgroup vibrations in the MIIG_t complex (19). Computational approaches emphasized the “strategic” location of the D(E)RY motif (27), and the Glu-134 carboxyl pK_a may critically depend on the lipid protein interface (28). However, the implications for proton switching are not evident, and the theoretical interest is contrasted by the lack of experimental data addressing the effect of the lipidic phase on side chain protonation, secondary structure, and membrane topology of the D(E)RY motif.We have studied the coupling between conformation and protonation in single transmembrane segments derived from H3 of bovine rhodopsin. We have assessed the “modular” function of the D(E)RY motif by determining parameters not evident from the crystal structures, i.e. the pK_a of the conserved carboxyl, its linkage to helical structure, and the effect of protonation on side chain to lipid headgroup distance. We show that the D(E)RY motif encodes an autonomous “proton switch” controlling side chain exposure and helix formation in the low dielectric of a lipidic phase. The data ascribe a functional role to lipid protein interactions that couple the chemical potential of protons to an activity-promoting GPCR conformation in a ligand-independent manner.     

The local environment at the cytoplasmic end of TM6 of the mu opioid receptor differs from those of rhodopsin and monoamine receptors: introduction of an ionic lock between the cytoplasmic ends of helices 3 and 6 by a L6.30(275)E mutation inactivates the mu opioid receptor and reduces the constitutive activity of its T6.34(279)K mutant

Activation of rhodopsin and monoamine G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been proposed to involve in part the disruption of a conserved E6.30-R3.50 ionic interaction between transmembrane segments (TMs) 3 and 6. However, this interaction does not occur in the opioid receptors, which have L275 at 6.30. On the basis of our findings that mutations of T6.34(279) to K and D produced, respectively, a constitutively active and an inactive form of the mu opioid receptor, we previously suggested that the functional role of the 6.30(275) residue could be assumed by T6.34(279), but the interplay between residues at positions 6.30 and 6.34 remained unresolved. In this study, we examined the effects of introducing an E in position 6.30(275) of the wild type (WT) and of the T6.34(279) mutants of the mu opioid receptor to compare the participation of the 6.30 locus in molecular events during activation in this receptor with its role in other GPCRs. The L6.30(275)E and the L6.30(275)E/T6.34(279)D mutants displayed no constitutive activity and could not be activated by the agonist DAMGO or morphine. The L6.30(275)E/T6.34(279)K mutant had some constitutive activity, but much less than the T6.34(279)K mutant, and could be activated by both agonists. The rank order of affinity for the agonist DAMGO is as follows: T6.34(279)K > WT congruent with L6.30(275)E/T6.34(279)K > L6.30(275)E congruent with T6.34(279)D > L6.30(275)E/T6.34(279)D; however, all constructs have a similar affinity for the antagonist [(3)H]diprenorphine. These data are interpreted in the context of interactions with the conserved R3.50(165) in TM3. When L6.30(275) is mutated to E, the favorable E6.30(275)-R3.50(165) interaction stabilizes an inactive state, as in rhodopsin, and hence reduces the activities of T6.34(279) mutants. Thus, the mu opioid receptor is shown to be different from rhodopsin and monoamine GPCRs, of which the WTs with native E6.30 can be activated, and the 6.34D or 6.34K mutants display enhanced constitutive activities. Our molecular modeling results suggest that some specific differences in local geometry at the cytoplasmic ends of TM5 and TM6 may account in part for the observed differences in the molecular mechanisms of receptor activation.     

Stabilization of the human beta2-adrenergic receptor TM4-TM3-TM5 helix interface by mutagenesis of Glu122(3.41), a critical residue in GPCR structure

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) instability represents one of the most profound obstacles in the structural study of GPCRs that bind diffusible ligands. The introduction of targeted mutations at nonconserved residues that lie proximal to helix interfaces has the potential to enhance the fold stability of the receptor helix bundle while maintaining wild-type receptor function. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effect of amino acid substitutions at Glu122^3.41 in the well-studied β₂-adrenergic receptor (β₂AR), which was predicted from sequence conservation to lie at a position equivalent to a tryptophan residue in rhodopsin at the 3,4,5 helix interface among transmembrane (TM) domains 3, 4, and 5. Replacement of Glu122^3.41 with bulky hydrophobic residues, such as tryptophan, tyrosine, and phenylalanine, increases the yield of functionally folded β₂AR by as much as 5-fold. Receptor stability in detergent solution was studied by isothermal denaturation, and it was found that the E122W and E122Y mutations enhanced the β₂AR thermal half-life by 9.3- and 6.7-fold, respectively, at 37 °C. The β₁AR was also stabilized by the introduction of tryptophan at Glu147^3.41, and the effect on protein behavior was similar to the rescue of the unstable wild-type receptor by the antagonist propranolol. Molecular modeling of the E122W and E122Y mutants revealed that the tryptophan ring edge and tyrosine hydroxyl are positioned proximal to the helical break in TM5 introduced by the conserved Pro211^5.50 and may stabilize the helix by interacting favorably with the unpaired carbonyl oxygen of Val206^5.45. Conformational flexibility of TM5 is likely to be a general property of class A GPCRs; therefore, engineering of the TM4-TM3-TM5 interface at the 3.41 position may provide a general strategy for the stabilization of other receptors.     

Involvement of the C-terminal proline-rich motif of G protein-coupled receptor kinases in recognition of activated rhodopsin

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are a family of serine/threonine kinases that phosphorylate many activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and play an important role in GPCR desensitization. Our previous work has demonstrated that the C-terminal conserved region (CC) of GRK-2 participates in interaction with rhodopsin and that this interaction is necessary for GRK-2-mediated receptor phosphorylation (Gan, X. Q., Wang, J. Y., Yang, Q. H., Li, Z., Liu, F., Pei, G., and Li, L. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8469-8474). In this report, we further investigated whether the CC of other GRKs had the same functions and defined the specific sequences in CC that are required for the functions. The CC regions of GRK-1, GRK-2, and GRK-5, representatives of the three subfamilies of GRKs, could bind rhodopsin in vitro and inhibit GRK-2-mediated phosphorylation of rhodopsin, but not a peptide GRK substrate. Through a series of mutagenesis analyses, a proline-rich motif in the CC was identified as the key element involved in the interaction between the CC region and rhodopsin. Point mutations of this motif not only disrupted the interaction of GRK-2 with rhodopsin but also abolished the ability of GRK-2 to phosphorylate rhodopsin. The findings that the CC region of GRKs interact only with the light-activated but not the non-activated rhodopsin and that the N-terminal domain of GRK-2 interacts with rhodopsin in a light-independent manner suggest that the CC region is responsible for the recognition of activated GPCRs in the canonical model.     

Structural insights into agonist-induced activation of G-protein-coupled receptors

Recent years have seen tremendous breakthroughs in structure determination of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In 2011, two agonist-bound active-state structures of rhodopsin have been published. Together with structures of several rhodopsin activation intermediates and a wealth of biochemical and spectroscopic information, they provide a unique structural framework on which to understand GPCR activation. Here we use this framework to compare the recent crystal structures of the agonist-bound active states of the β(2) adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR) and the A(2A) adenosine receptor (A(2A)AR). While activation of these three GPCRs results in rearrangements of TM5 and TM6, the extent of this conformational change varies considerably. Displacements of the cytoplasmic side of TM6 ranges between 3 and 8? depending on whether selective stabilizers of the active conformation are used (i.e. a G-protein peptide in the case of rhodopsin or a conformationally selective nanobody in the case of the β(2)AR) or not (A(2A)AR). The agonist-induced conformational changes in the ligand-binding pocket are largely receptor specific due to the different chemical nature of the agonists. However, several similarities can be observed, including a relocation of conserved residues W6.48 and F6.44 towards L5.51 and P5.50, and of I/L3.40 away from P5.50. This transmission switch links agonist binding to the movement of TM5 and TM6 through the rearrangement of the TM3-TM5-TM6 interface, and possibly constitutes a common theme of GPCR activation.     

The fourth transmembrane segment of the dopamine D2 receptor: accessibility in the binding-site crevice and position in the transmembrane bundle

The binding site of the dopamine D2 receptor, like that of homologous G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), is contained within a water-accessible crevice formed among its seven transmembrane segments (TMSs). Using the substituted-cysteine-accessibility method (SCAM), we are mapping the residues that contribute to the surface of this binding-site crevice. We have mutated to cysteine, one at a time, 21 consecutive residues in the fourth TMS (TM4). Eleven of these mutants reacted with charged sulfhydryl-specific reagents, and bound antagonist protected nine of these from reaction. For the mutants in which cysteine was substituted for residues in the cytoplasmic half of TM4, treatment with the reagents had no effect on binding, consistent with these residues being inaccessible and with the low-resolution structure of the homologous rhodopsin, in which TM3 and TM5 occlude the cytoplasmic half of TM4. Although hydrophobicity analysis positions the C-terminus of TM4 at 4.64, Pro-Pro and Pro-X-Pro motifs, which are known to disrupt alpha-helices, occur at position 4.59 in a number of homologous GPCRs. The SCAM data were consistent with a C-terminus at 4.58, but it is also possible that the alpha-helix extends one additional turn to 4.62 in the D2 receptor, which has a single Pro at 4.59. In homologous GPCRs, the high degree of sequence variation between 4.59 and 4.68 is more characteristic of a loop domain than a helical segment. This region is shown here to be very conserved within functionally related receptors, suggesting an important functional role for this putative nonhelical domain. This inference is supported by observed ligand-specific effects of mutations in this region and by the predicted spatial proximity of this segment to known ligand binding sites in other TMs.     

Linkage between the intramembrane H-bond network around aspartic acid 83 and the cytosolic environment of helix 8 in photoactivated rhodopsin

Understanding the coupling between conformational changes in the intramembrane domain and at the membrane-exposed surface of the bovine photoreceptor rhodopsin, a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), is crucial for the elucidation of molecular mechanisms in GPCR activation. Here, we have combined Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and fluorescence spectroscopy to address the coupling between conformational changes in the intramembrane region around the retinal and the environment of helix 8, a putative cytosolic surface switch region in class-I GPCRs. Using FTIR/fluorescence cross-correlation we show specifically that surface alterations monitored by emission changes of fluorescein bound to Cys316 in helix 8 of rhodopsin are highly correlated with (i) H-bonding to Asp83 proximal of the retinal Schiff base but not to Glu122 close to the beta-ionone and (ii) with a metarhodopsin II (MII)-specific 1643 cm(-1) IR absorption change, indicative of a partial loss of secondary structure in helix 8 upon MII formation. These correlations are disrupted by limited C-terminal proteolysis but are maintained upon binding of a transducin alpha-subunit (G(talpha))-derived peptide, which stabilizes the MII state. Our results suggest that additional C-terminal cytosolic loop contacts monitored by an amide II absorption at 1557 cm(-1) play a functionally crucial role in keeping helix 8 in the position in which its environment is strongly coupled to the retinal-binding site near the Schiff base. In the intramembrane region, this coupling is mediated by the H-bonding network that connects Asp83 to the NPxxY(x)F motif preceding helix 8.     

Molecular dynamics simulations reveal insights into key structural elements of adenosine receptors

The crystal structure of the human A(2A) adenosine receptor, a member of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, is used as a starting point for the structural characterization of the conformational equilibrium around the inactive conformation of the human A(2) (A(2A) and A(2B)) adenosine receptors (ARs). A homology model of the closely related A(2B)AR is reported, and the two receptors were simulated in their apo form through all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Different conditions were additionally explored in the A(2A)AR, including the protonation state of crucial histidines or the presence of the cocrystallized ligand. Our simulations reveal the role of several conserved residues in the ARs in the conformational equilibrium of the receptors. The "ionic lock" absent in the crystal structure of the inactive A(2A)AR is rapidly formed in the two simulated receptors, and a complex network of interacting residues is presented that further stabilizes this structural element. Notably, the observed rotameric transition of Trp6.48 ("toggle switch"), which is thought to initiate the activation process in GPCRs, is accompanied by a concerted rotation of the conserved residue of the A(2)ARs, His6.52. This new conformation is further stabilized in the two receptors under study by a novel interaction network involving residues in transmembrane (TM) helices TM5 (Asn5.42) and TM3 (Gln3.37), which resemble the conformational changes recently observed in the agonist-bound structure of β-adrenoreceptors. Finally, the interaction between Glu1.39 and His7.43, a pair of conserved residues in the family of ARs, is found to be weaker than previously thought, and the role of this interaction in the structure and dynamics of the receptor is thoroughly examined. All these findings suggest that, despite the commonalities with other GPCRs, the conformational equilibrium of ARs is also modulated by specific residues of the family.     

Conserved activation pathways in G-protein-coupled receptors

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) are seven-transmembrane helix proteins that transduce exogenous and endogenous signals to modulate the activity of downstream effectors inside the cell. Despite the relevance of these proteins in human physiology and pharmaceutical research, we only recently started to understand the structural basis of their activation mechanism. In the period 2008-2011, nine active-like structures of GPCRs were solved. Among them, we have determined the structure of light-activated rhodopsin with all the features of the active metarhodopsin-II, which represents so far the most native-like model of an active GPCR. This structure, together with the structures of other inactive, intermediate and active states of rhodopsin constitutes a unique structural framework on which to understand the conserved aspects of the activation mechanism of GPCRs. This mechanism can be summarized as follows: retinal isomerization triggers a series of local structural changes in the binding site that are amplified into three intramolecular activation pathways through TM (transmembrane helix) 5/TM3, TM6 and TM7/TM2. Sequence analysis strongly suggests that these pathways are conserved in other GPCRs. Differential activation of these pathways by ligands could be translated into the stabilization of different active states of the receptor with specific signalling properties.