The self-retained Le Fort I osteotomy

Because inferior repositioning of the maxilla after Le Fort I osteotomy has a high relapse rate, a modified bone cut oriented obliquely upward has been tried in 29 patients. The modification allows extrusion of the fragment while maintaining good bony contact, thus eliminating the need for bone grafts. It also permits self-retention of the fragment and can be adapted to movements in any plane.     

Dual midfacial distraction osteogenesis: Le Fort III minus I and Le Fort I for syndromic craniosynostosis

Midfacial hypoplasia has been corrected by Le Fort III or monobloc forward advancement in one stage in syndromic craniosynostosis, but recently developed distraction osteogenesis has been in use. Whereas the amount of forward mobilization in Le Fort III conventional osteotomy is determined by the preplanned fabricated interdental splint, that in Le Fort III distraction is determined by the positions of the inferior orbital rim, malar complex, and nose. Therefore, the forward mobilization of the upper part of the midface may sometimes be insufficient when one focuses on the final occlusion, and the occlusion might not be satisfied when the forward mobilization is sufficient. Correction of the midfacial hypoplasia should be considered differently in the upper and lower portions of the midface. The upper portion contains the inferior orbit and nose, and the lower portion contains the occlusal structure of the maxillary dentoalveolar portion with the mandible. Separating the midface into two portions and conducting the distraction osteogenesis in both portions separately in different amounts and vectors of distraction is described in this article. Although distraction of the upper portion of the midface can be conducted in one direction with an internal device, distraction of the lower portion of the midface is preferred for conduction by a controllable device because of the need to obtain the preferred occlusion. To obtain better functional and aesthetic results in midfacial distraction in adults and adolescents with syndromic craniosynostosis, dual Le Fort III minus I and Le Fort I midfacial distraction osteogenesis was performed in four cases (in two patients with Crouzon syndrome and in two patients with Apert syndrome). Two females and two males are described (age range, 13 to 26 years). An internal device was used for the upper portion of the midface and an external device was used for the lower portion. The amount of distraction ranged from 14 to 21 mm in the upper portion of the midface and from 11 to 18 mm in the lower portion. No particular complications were noticed over a follow-up period of 10 to 38 months (average follow-up, 19.8 months).     

Lip-nasal aesthetics following Le Fort I osteotomy

Forty-one patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy for superior and/or anterior repositioning of the maxilla were prospectively studied for changes in soft-tissue morphology of the nasomaxillary region. Nasal parameters studied were changes in interalar rim width and nasal tip projection. It was observed that alar rim width increases with anterior and/or superior repositioning of the maxilla, but increases in nasal tip projection occur only when there is an anterior vector of maxillary movement. These nasal changes could not be quantitatively correlated to magnitude of maxillary movement. Lip changes studied were the horizontal displacement at the vermilion border and subnasale versus that of the incisal edge and point A, respectively, when the maxilla is sagittally advanced and the vertical shortening of the lip versus that of the incisal edge when the maxilla is shortened. Using linear regression analysis, horizontal displacement of the upper lip at the vermilion border was 0.82 +/- 0.13 mm for every 1 mm of maxillary advancement at the incisal edge (p less than 0.001) and 0.51 +/- 0.13 at the subnasale for every 1 mm of maxillary advancement at point A (p less than 0.001). Eighty percent of patients undergoing maxillary intrusive procedures had lip shortening ranging from 20 to 50 percent of the vertical maxillary reduction. Surprisingly, no statistically significant correlation could be demonstrated for lip shortening versus extent of vertical maxillary reduction. Previous literature in disagreement with these findings is discussed. Guidelines for treatment planning utilizing these data are suggested.     

Midface distraction following Le Fort III and monobloc osteotomies: problems and solutions

Distraction osteogenesis has been used increasingly for midfacial advancement in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis and in severe developmental hypoplasia of the midface. In these patients, the degree of advancement required is often so great that restriction of the adjacent soft tissues may preclude stable advancement in one stage. Whereas distraction is an ideal solution by which to gradually lengthen both the bones and the soft tissues, potential problems remain in translating the distraction forces to the midface. In these patients, severe developmental hypoplasia may be associated with weak union between the zygoma and the maxilla, increasing the chance of zygomaticomaxillary dysjunction when using internal devices that translate distraction force to the maxilla through the zygoma. Eight cases are reported in which either internal or external distraction systems were used for midface advancement following Le Fort III (n = 7) or monobloc (n = 1) osteotomies. Cases of patients in whom hypoplasia at the zygomaticomaxillary junction altered or impaired plans for midface distraction were reported from three host institutions. Seven patients had midface hypoplasia associated with syndromic craniosynostosis, and one patient had severe developmental midface hypoplasia. The distraction protocol was modified to successfully complete midface advancement in light of weakness at the zygomaticomaxillary junction in seven patients. Modifications included change from an internal to an external distraction system in two patients, rigid fixation and bone graft stabilization of the midface in one patient, and plate stabilization of a fractured or unstable zygomaticomaxillary junction followed by resumption of internal distraction in four patients. Previous infection and bone loss involving both malar complexes precluded one patient from being a candidate for an internal distraction system. Using a problem-based approach, successful advancement of the midface ranging from 9 to 26 mm at the occlusal level as measured by preoperative and postoperative cephalograms was undergone by all patients. Advantages and disadvantages of the respective distraction systems are reviewed to better understand unique patient characteristics leading to the successful use of these devices for correction of severe midface hypoplasia.     

Le Fort fractures without mobility

The Le Fort fracture without maxillary mobility constitutes 9 percent of maxillary fractures observed over a 3-year period. A high Le Fort (level II or III) injury exists as a one- or two-piece incomplete fracture. The degree of fracture is insufficient to permit mobility of the maxillary alveolus. Frequently, an obvious unilateral zygomatic fracture is present. Physical findings consist of bilateral eyelid ecchymosis and malocclusion. The occlusal disturbance may consist of either crossbite, open bite, maxillary rotation, or lack of proper dental intercuspation. On CT scan, fractures are best demonstrated in the posterior and medial maxillary walls at the Le Fort I level; they are most obvious unilaterally with contralateral fractures that may be subtle. Bilateral maxillary sinus fluid is consistently present on CT. Treatment usually consists of observation and traction elastics but may require mobilization of the fragments followed by open reduction and rigid fixation.     

Blindness as a complication of Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary distraction

High Le Fort I osteotomy and maxillary distraction has become an accepted method for the treatment of maxillary retrusion in children and teenagers with cleft lip and palate or craniofacial anomalies. This procedure effectively corrects the dentofacial deformity in these patients. No major surgical morbidity has been reported. During the past 4 years, 94 cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia received Le Fort I osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis at the authors' center. Two of them developed blindness after this operation. The first case was a girl with bilateral cleft lip and palate with median facial dysplasia. She received high Le Fort I osteotomy at age 12 years 4 months to correct maxillary retrusion. Right eye swelling and ecchymosis was found after surgery. The patient complained of vision loss in that eye 2 days later. Computed tomography showed subarachnoid hemorrhage and skull base hematoma. There were no atypical fractures in the orbit, pterygoid plates, sphenoid bone, and skull base. Angiogram revealed left ophthalmic and basilar artery aneurysm. The second case was a 12-year-old boy with left cleft lip and palate. He received Le Fort I osteotomy to correct maxillary retrusion. During surgery, abnormal pupil dilatation was found after the osteotomy and down-fracture of maxilla. Emergent computed tomography found no hemorrhage or atypical fractures. Examination revealed complete left optic neuropathy and partial right abducens nerve palsy with mydriasis. Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance angiography, and repeated computed tomography revealed no sign of orbital injury, vascular problem, or abnormal fractures. The cause of blindness was unknown. In both cases, a steroid was used. Maxillary distraction was continued. Recovery of meaningful visual sense did not occur after 3 and 2 years' follow-up, respectively. A review of the literature revealed five other patients who suffered from visual loss after Le Fort I osteotomy. Inadvertent skull base fractures were identified in two cases, but a cause for the blindness was not known in the others. Induced hypotension and indirect trauma may be responsible for the optic nerve injury. In none of the cases was meaningful visual sense recovered, although high-dose steroids were given. In conclusion, a total of seven cases developed blindness after Le Fort I osteotomy. Once blindness develops, the prognosis is poor. High Le Fort I osteotomy should be performed with extreme care, and perhaps the informed consent should include visual loss as a complication of the procedure.     

An analysis of Le Fort I maxillary advancement in cleft lip and palate patients.

We present a series of 24 consecutive cleft lip and palate patients aged 16 to 46 years (mean age 27 years) who underwent Le Fort I maxillary advancement by the senior author over the past 8 years. Two groups, one of 12 patients with wire fixation and one of 12 patients with miniplate fixation, were evaluated. Each group had 10 unilateral and 2 bilateral clefts. All patients were grafted with autogenous bone (8 cranial, 14 iliac, and 2 mandibular). Horizontal advancement was 3 mm to 2 cm (with a mean of 7.8 mm). Vertical movement ranged from a shortening of 5 mm to a lengthening of 1.3 cm (mean 2.3 mm of lengthening). The amount and timing of relapse were compared in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions. The plated group was more stable in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions (p < 0.05). No significant skeletal relapses occurred after the first year. Statistically significant dental relapse occurred only in the wired group. Three patients developed transverse collapse of the small maxillary cleft segment, and four developed incisor angulation to compensate for maxillary skeletal relapse. The presence of a pharyngeal flap at the time of advancement appeared to increase relapse in both horizontal and vertical dimensions (p < 0.03), but there were too few patients (7 of 24) with pharyngeal flaps to prove this conclusively. We also concluded that pterygomandibular grafting is not necessary to achieve excellent results using miniplate fixation; autogenous grafting of the anterior maxillary osteotomy alone provides the necessary stability.     

Skeletal stability after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

Outcomes in 30 adults and adolescents judged skeletally mature who had unilateral cleft lip and palate and underwent Le Fort I advancement were investigated to determine amount and timing of relapse, correlation between advancement and relapse, effect of performing multiple jaw procedures, effect of different types of bone grafts, effect of pharyngoplasty in place at the time of osteotomy, and effectiveness of various methods of internal fixation. Tracings of preoperative and serial postoperative lateral cephalograms were digitized to calculate horizontal and vertical maxillary changes. No significant differences in outcome was seen between patients who had maxillary surgery alone and those who had operations on both jaws, nor did the outcome vary significantly with the type of autogenous bone graft used or the segmentalization of the Le Fort osteotomy. Mean "effective" advancement was greater immediately and 2 years after surgery in those patients who did not have a pharyngoplasty in place before the operation. Advancement also was greater immediately and after 2 years in the miniplate fixation group than in patients with direct-wire fixation. Mean downward (vertical) displacement was 2.6 mm with a relapse of 1.4 mm after 2 years. Amounts of relapse and of advancement or displacement did not correlate significantly.     

A new transfacial approach for lesions of the clivus and parapharyngeal space: the partial segmented Le Fort I osteotomy

Tumors of the clival and parapharyngeal areas are a challenge because of their location. They used to be considered inaccessible because the aggressive approaches employed caused elevated levels of morbidity. This fact led to more conservative approaches that attempted to preserve the exposure of the lesion. These approaches were a combination of cranial and facial procedures, thus utilizing a combined effort between neurosurgeons and maxillofacial surgeons. We described our experience with a partial segmented Le Fort I osteotomy added to a transmandibular approach to expose a chordoma of the clivus and left parapharyngeal space. A three-dimensional imaging was used as a diagnostic tool and to plan the optimal surgical approach. The operative technique was described in this case study. Some important technical details of the approach are described. The global outcome was favorable.     

Biomechanical interactions of different mini-plate fixations and maxilla advancements in the Le Fort I Osteotomy: a finite element analysis

This study investigates the biomechanical interaction of different mini-plate fixation types (shapes/sizes and patterns) with segmental advancement levels on the Le Fort I osteotomy using the non-linear finite element (FE) approach. Nine models were generated under a standard 1-piece LeFort I osteotomy for advancement with 3, 6 and 9 mm distances and four mini-plates with three fixation patterns including LL, LI, and II patterns placed on the maxillae models by integrating computed tomography images and computer-aided design system. The axial and oblique occlusal forces were 250 N applied to each premolar/molar and 125 N applied at 30° inclination to the tooth long axis and from palatal to buccal, respectively. The relative micro-movement values between the two maxillary bone segments and maximum mini-plate stress increased obviously with maxilla advancement increment and the increasing trend can be fitted by exponential curve. The corresponding values in II mini-plate fixation presented apparently high values in all simulated cases. The mini-plate stress concentration locations were found at the bending regions to increase high fracture risk. The mini-plate yield strength can be mapped to a critical (limited) advancement for three types of fixations for safe consideration. This study concluded that L-shaped mini-plates with lateral fixation are recommended to provide better stability. The risk for mini-plate fracture and bone relapse increases when maxillary advancement is larger than a critical value of 5 mm in the Le Fort I osteotomy.     

The effect of an early Le Fort III surgery on permanent molar eruption

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the extent to which an early Le Fort III osteotomy affects the position and eruption of the permanent maxillary first and second molars. To test the null hypothesis that there are no changes in eruption patterns, 31 patients diagnosed with craniosynostoses (13 with Crouzon's syndrome, nine with Apert's syndrome, eight with Pfeiffer's syndrome, and one with Carpenter's syndrome) with a mean age at the time of surgery of 5.3 +/- 1.3 years were studied. All patients underwent a Le Fort III osteotomy performed by a single surgeon to correct the anatomical deformity for functional and psychosocial reasons. Eighteen patients with craniosynostoses who had not been operated on (11 with Crouzon's syndrome, four with Apert's syndrome, and three with Pfeiffer's syndrome) served as controls; they had a mean age of 21.2 +/- 9.5 years. First and second molar positions and eruption patterns were assessed separately on panoramic radiographs by three observers. For the patients who underwent surgery, long-term evaluation showed that although 79 percent of all first molars erupted compared with 100 percent for the control group (p < 0.001), only 18 percent of all second permanent molars erupted compared with 89 percent for the control group (p < 0.0001). The authors conclude that in a significant minority of cases, early Le Fort III osteotomy affects first molar eruption, whereas the probability of second molar eruption is significantly decreased in the majority of cases. Therefore, Le Fort III osteotomy sites should be positioned distal to the second molar tooth buds. If this is not possible, patients, parents, and dental professionals should be made aware of these early postosteotomy sequelae so that later treatment planning can be enhanced.     

The Le Fort III advancement osteotomy in the child under 7 years of age

This is a longitudinal study of 12 patients with craniofacial synostosis syndromes (Crouzon's, Apert's, Pfeiffer's) who underwent Le Fort III advancement under the age of 7 years (average age 5.1 years, range 4.0 to 6.7 years). The average follow-up was 5.0 years and included clinical, dental, and cephalometric examinations according to a prescribed protocol. The study demonstrated that the procedure could be safely performed in the younger child with an acceptable level of morbidity. There was a remarkable degree of postoperative stability of the maxillary segment. However, although vertical (inferior) growth or movement of the midfacial segment was demonstrated, there was minimal, if any, anterior or horizontal growth. Any occlusal disharmony developing during the period of follow-up could be attributed to anticipated mandibular development and could be corrected by orthognathic surgery. The roles of surgical overcorrection and anterior-pull headgear therapy after release of intermaxillary fixation are also discussed. The Le Fort III osteotomy is justifiably indicated during early childhood for psychological and physiologic reasons.