Venous congestion and blood flow in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps

A series of 240 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and 271 free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps from two institutions was reviewed to determine the incidence of diffuse venous insufficiency that threatened flap survival and required a microvascular anastomosis to drain the superficial inferior epigastric vein. This problem occurred in five DIEP flaps and did not occur in any of the free TRAM flaps. In each of these cases, the presence of a superficial inferior epigastric vein that was larger than usual was noted. It is therefore suggested that if an unusually large superficial inferior epigastric vein is noted when a DIEP flap is elevated, the vein should be preserved for possible use in flap salvage. Anatomical studies with Microfil injections of the superficial venous system of the DIEP or TRAM flap were also performed in 15 cadaver and 3 abdominoplasty specimens to help determine why venous circulation (and flap survival) in zone IV of the flaps is so variable. Large lateral branches crossing the midline were found in only 18 percent of cases, whereas 45 percent had indirect connections through a deeper network of smaller veins and 36 percent had no demonstrable crossing branches at all. This absence of crossing branches in many patients may explain why survival of the zone IV portion of such flaps is so variable and unpredictable.     

The coincidence of TRAM flaps and prostheses in the setting of breast reconstruction

It is well known that transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps can be used to replace unsatisfactory prosthetic breast reconstructions; however, little has been written about the scope of breast implant use in TRAM flap patients. In this study, to ascertain the range of such therapeutic options, their frequency, and their clinical outcomes, the authors retrospectively reviewed the senior author's breast reconstruction experience from 1989 to 2000 with patients in whom both a TRAM flap and an implant were used for breast reconstruction. The authors examined the surgical indications, body habitus, bra size, chest wall irradiation history, flap type, implant type, complications, and outcomes for those patients with TRAM flap and breast implant combinations.Thirty-two women who had 50 (various) combinations of a TRAM flap and a breast implant were identified. There were more clinical scenarios than patients because many of the women had multiple scenarios. The 50 combination scenarios were then divided into six groups. Group I consisted of 14 patients who had elective prostheses placed beneath simultaneous TRAM flaps; group II consisted of 10 patients who had TRAM flaps with contralateral prosthetic reconstruction (in which two implants were received before the TRAM flaps, five implants were received simultaneously with the TRAM flaps, and three implants were received after the TRAM flaps); group III consisted of eight patients who had contralateral augmentation in addition to their TRAM flaps; group IV consisted of 11 patients who had TRAM flaps that were used to cover or replace previous prosthetic reconstructions; group V consisted of four patients in whom prostheses were used to augment or improve previous TRAM flap reconstructions; and group VI consisted of three patients who required prostheses to either reconstruct or salvage total or near-total TRAM flap failures. A broad range of implant types was used, although anatomic saline implants predominated. Forty-one percent of the patients in the review had undergone irradiation during the course of their treatment for breast cancer. Eight of the 32 patients experienced a total of twelve complications, four of which were related to the implants and eight of which involved the TRAM flaps and abdominal donor sites.Although complex, the wide variety of potential TRAM flap/breast implant combinations can be useful for patients with challenging reconstructive scenarios, particularly those that involve radiation therapy. In the group of patients reviewed by the authors, TRAM flaps were most often used in successful partnership either on the same side as or opposite to an implant reconstruction. A TRAM flap was used to salvage or replace an unsatisfactory implant reconstruction in less than a third of the patients. From a risk point of view, implants used opposite a TRAM flap reconstruction had a lower incidence of complication than did implants used beneath TRAM flaps.     

Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection,choice of flap,and outcome

Recent reports of breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap indicate increased fat necrosis and venous congestion as compared with the free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap. Although the benefits of the DIEP flap regarding the abdominal wall are well documented, its reconstructive advantage remains uncertain. The main objective of this study was to address selection criteria for the free TRAM and DIEP flaps on the basis of patient characteristics and vascular anatomy of the flap that might minimize flap morbidity. A total of 163 free TRAM or DIEP flap breast reconstructions were performed on 135 women between 1997 and 2000. Four levels of muscle sparing related to the rectus abdominis muscle were used. The free TRAM flap was performed on 118 women, of whom 93 were unilateral and 25 were bilateral, totaling 143 flaps. The DIEP flap procedure was performed on 17 women, of whom 14 were unilateral and three were bilateral, totaling 20 flaps. Morbidities related to the 143 free TRAM flaps included return to the operating room for 11 flaps (7.7 percent), total necrosis in five flaps (3.5 percent), mild fat necrosis in 14 flaps (9.8 percent), mild venous congestion in two flaps (1.4 percent), and lower abdominal bulge in eight women (6.8 percent). Partial flap necrosis did not occur. Morbidities related to the 20 DIEP flaps included return to the operating room for three flaps (15 percent), total necrosis in one flap (5 percent), and mild fat necrosis in two flaps (10 percent). Partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, and a lower abdominal bulge were not observed. Selection of the free TRAM or DIEP flap should be made on the basis of patient weight, quantity of abdominal fat, and breast volume requirement, and on the number, caliber, and location of the perforating vessels. Occurrence of venous congestion and total flap loss in the free TRAM and DIEP flaps appears to be independent of the patient age, weight, degree of muscle sparing, and tobacco use. The occurrence of fat necrosis is related to patient weight (p < 0.001) but not related to patient age or preservation of the rectus abdominis muscle. The ability to perform a sit-up is related to patient weight (p < 0.001) and patient age (p < 0.001) but not related to preservation of the muscle or intercostal nerves. The incidence of lower abdominal bulge is reduced after DIEP flap reconstruction (p < 0.001). The DIEP flap can be an excellent option for properly selected women.     

Delay in unipedicled TRAM flap reconstruction of the breast: a review of 76 consecutive cases

Since its introduction in 1982, the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap has become the standard therapy in autogenous breast reconstruction. A lower rate of partial flap (fat) necrosis is associated with microvascular free-flap transfer compared with the conventional (unipedicled) TRAM flap because of its potentially improved blood supply. A TRAM flap delay before flap transfer has been advocated, especially in a high-risk patient population (obesity, history of cigarette smoking, radiation therapy, or abdominal scar). The authors reviewed a series of 76 consecutive delayed unipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions during a 5-year period. Data were analyzed with respect to type of procedure and time of delay, overall outcome, general surgical complications, flap-related (specific) complications (partial or complete flap loss), and patient satisfaction. Seventy-six unilateral breast reconstructions using the unipedicled TRAM flap were performed between 1995 and 2000 in 76 patients (mean age, 47.4 years). Fifty-four flaps were performed as immediate reconstructions, and 22 as secondary procedures. Seventy-two flaps were based on the contralateral pedicle, and four flaps were based on an ipsilateral pedicle. In all cases, a flap delay consisted of ligature of both deep inferior epigastric arteries and veins, accessed from an inferior flap incision down to the fascia, with a mean of 13.9 days before the flap transfer. No acute flap take-back procedure had to be performed. There was no complete flap loss, and breast reconstruction was achieved in all cases. In five cases (6.6 percent), a partial (fat) flap necrosis occurred. Interestingly, the majority of these cases (four of five) were secondary breast reconstructions. In addition, of the five patients who had partial flap necrosis, four had a history of smoking, two received radiation therapy, three received chemotherapy, and three patients were obese (body mass index greater than or equal to 30) or overweight (body mass index greater than or equal to 25). In three cases, an early surgical complication (two wound infections at the flap interface and one at the donor site) occurred. One patient developed a deep vein thrombosis. Five patients developed secondary ventral hernias necessitating repair (6.6 percent). Forty-one patients underwent secondary nipple-areola reconstruction. In 19 patients of this group, a secondary procedure (e.g., scar revision, limited liposuction, and/or excision of contour deformities) was simultaneously performed. A survey of patient satisfaction was performed using a modified SF-36 questionnaire. Fifty-one patients participated (67 percent). The overall satisfaction was very high and 51 patients reported that they would recommend the procedure to others (100 percent). Multiple factors such as patient selection, surgical expertise, and preoperative and postoperative management contribute to the success of any type of autogenous breast reconstruction. However, rare partial and absent complete flap necrosis in the authors' series may be attributable to the flap delay. A low morbidity rate and short hospital stay may become increasingly relevant, with limited structural and financial resources in the future. Therefore, the delayed unipedicled TRAM flap should be regarded as a valuable option in attempted breast reconstruction using autogenous tissue in both a high-risk and the general patient population.     

The role of emergent exploration in free-tissue transfer: a review of 150 consecutive cases

One-hundred and fifty consecutive free-tissue transfers were reviewed to evaluate the role of emergent exploration in flap survival. Eleven flaps exhibited signs of circulatory failure between 1 hour and 6 days postoperatively and required return to the operating room. In eight patients the preoperative diagnosis was venous thrombosis, and in three patients it was arterial thrombosis. The average time from the first abnormal examination to exploration was 1.5 hours. There were no false-positive explorations. All 11 flaps were salvaged following correction of the cause of circulatory compromise. In eight patients this was due to inflow or outflow obstruction in the recipient vessels proximal to the anastomosis, in two patients it was due to extrinsic compression of the flap from a tight wound closure, and in one patient it was due to obstruction of the recipient vein by a drain. Primary anastomotic thrombosis was not encountered as the cause of circulatory compromise in any patient. An aggressive approach to exploration was responsible for an increase in flap survival in the entire series from 90 to 98 percent. The results of this study demonstrate the efficacy of clinical monitoring, the role of early exploration, and the durability of microvascular anastomoses.     

Perforator flap breast reconstruction using internal mammary perforator branches as a recipient site: an anatomical and clinical analysis

A variety of useful recipient sites exist for breast reconstruction with free flaps, and correct selection remains a significant decision for the surgeon. Among the main pedicles, the disadvantages of the internal mammary vessels are the necessity of costal cartilage resection and the impairment of future cardiac bypass. This study was designed to reduce morbidity and to seek alternative recipient vessels. In the anatomical part of the study, 32 parasternal regions from 16 fresh cadavers were used. The locations and components of internal mammary perforator branches were measured and a histomorphometric analysis was performed. In the clinical part of the study, 36 patients underwent 38 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and two superior gluteal artery perforator flap breast reconstructions (31 immediate and four bilateral). The recipient vessels were evaluated. In the anatomical study, there were 22 perforating vessels, with 14 (63.6 percent) on the second intercostal space and 11 (50 percent) with one artery and vein. The average (+/-SD) internal and external perforator artery diameters were 598.48 +/- 176.68 microm and 848.97 +/- 276.68 microm, respectively. In the clinical study, 13 successful anastomoses (32.5 percent) were performed at the internal mammary perforator branches (second and third intercostal spaces) with 12 DIEP flaps and one superior gluteal artery perforator flap (all performed as immediate reconstructions). One case of intraoperative vein thrombosis and one case of pedicle avulsion during flap molding were observed. The anatomic and clinical studies demonstrated that the internal mammary perforator branch as a recipient site is a further refinement to free flap breast reconstruction. However, it is neither a reproducible technique nor potentially applicable in all patients. Preoperative planning between the general surgeon and the plastic surgeon is crucial to preserve the main perforator branches during mastectomy. The procedure was not demonstrable in late reconstructions. The main advantages of internal mammary perforator branches used as recipient sites are sparing of the internal mammary vessels for a possible future cardiac surgery, prevention of thoracic deformities, and reduction of the operative time by limited dissection. Despite this, limited surgical exposure, caliber incompatibility, and technical difficulties have to be considered as the main restrictions.     

Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap?

Use of the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap for immediate breast reconstruction is controversial because of fear of flap loss and concern that a high complication rate could interfere with adjuvant therapy. One common complication of the TRAM, partial flap necrosis, can interfere with both institution of postoperative therapy and evaluation for recurrence. In an attempt to minimize this problem, we began using the free TRAM flap based on the inferior deep epigastric vessels. This study compares our experience with conventional superior-pedicled (cTRAM) flaps and free TRAM (fTRAM) flaps. A total of 68 breasts were reconstructed in 63 patients, of which 48 of 68 (71 percent) were conventional TRAM flaps and 20 of 68 (29 percent) were free TRAM flaps. Of the 48 conventional TRAM flaps, 26 (54 percent) were unipedicled and 22 (46 percent) were bipedicled. There were 39 of 48 (81 percent) conventional TRAM flaps and 17 of 20 (85 percent) free TRAM flaps with T1 or T2 lesions. Node-positive patients occurred in 14 of 48 (29 percent) conventional TRAM flaps and 2 of 20 (10 percent) free TRAM flaps. One-fourth of patients in both groups smoked cigarettes. Twenty-one of 48 patients (44 percent) with conventional TRAM flaps required postoperative chemotherapy, and 6 of 21 (29 percent) were delayed because of complications of the TRAM flap. Of the 7 of 20 (35 percent) free TRAM flap patients who required post-operative chemotherapy, only 1 of 7 (14 percent) was delayed because of TRAM flap complications.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps

A series of 310 breasts reconstructed by a single surgeon using free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps was reviewed to see if there were any differences in the incidence of fat necrosis and/or partial flap loss between the two techniques. During the study period, 279 breasts were reconstructed with free TRAM flaps and 31 breasts were reconstructed with DIEP flaps. In the breasts reconstructed with free TRAM flaps, the incidence of partial flap loss was 2.2 percent and the incidence of fat necrosis was 12.9 percent. The DIEP flaps were divided into two groups. For the first eight flaps, patients were selected using the same criteria normally used to choose patients for free TRAM flaps. In this unselected early group, the incidence of partial flap loss was 37.5 percent and the incidence of fat necrosis was 62.5 percent. Because of the high incidence of partial flap loss and fat necrosis in the first eight flaps, subsequent selection was modified to limit the use of DIEP flaps to patients who had at least one sufficiently large perforator in each flap (a palpable pulse and a vein at least 1 mm in diameter) and who did not require more than 70 percent of the flap to create a breast of adequate size. In this later (selected) group, fat necrosis (17.4 percent) and partial flap loss (8.7 percent) were reduced to a level only moderately higher than that found in the free TRAM flap group. From these data, it can be concluded that the incidence of partial flap loss and fat necrosis is higher in DIEP flaps than in free TRAM flaps, probably because the blood flow to the former flap is less robust. This difficulty can be circumvented to some extent, however, by careful patient selection. Factors that should be considered include tobacco use, size of the perforators (especially the vein), and (in unilateral reconstructions) the amount of flap tissue across the midline needed to create an adequately sized breast. If these factors are properly considered when planning the operation, fat necrosis and partial flap loss can be reduced to an acceptable level. For selected patients, the DIEP flap is an excellent technique that can obtain a successful, autologous tissue breast reconstruction with minimal donor-site morbidity. For patients who are not good candidates for reconstruction with this flap, the free TRAM flap remains a good alternative.     

An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective study of 100 patients

The thoracodorsal vessels have been the standard recipient vessels for the majority of surgeons performing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstructions. Recently, the internal mammary vessels have been recommended as the first-choice recipient vessels for microvascular breast reconstruction. This approach requires a shorter pedicle length, allows for central placement of flap tissue, and avoids axillary scarring. The use of the internal mammary vessels may provide for a shorter operative time and a higher-quality aesthetic reconstruction. The authors performed a prospective trial examining the differences in operative and aesthetic outcomes between each recipient site. A prospective trial of 108 consecutive free-tissue transfers was conducted in 100 patients. The first 60 TRAM flap patients were randomized so that 30 flaps were anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels and 30 were anastomosed to the thoracodorsal vessels, whereas the recipient vessels for the remaining 40 patients were left to the discretion of the surgeon. Of the 40 nonrandomized patients, 10 patients underwent reconstruction using the internal mammary vessels and 30 patients underwent reconstruction using the thoracodorsal vessels. The patients' medical history and hospital course were noted. To evaluate aesthetic outcome, a group of five blinded nonmedical observers and three blinded plastic surgeons graded the reconstructions in the 60 TRAM flap patients for symmetry and overall aesthetic result on a scale of 1 to 5. Blinded practitioners administered postoperative questionnaires to patients regarding recovery time and satisfaction with the aesthetic result. Forty-three flaps were transferred to the internal mammary vessels and 65 were transferred to the thoracodorsal vessels. No significant differences existed between groups with regard to age of preoperative risk factors. Average operative time was 6 hours in each group. Average hospital stay was 5.8 days in each group. Conversion from initial recipient vessel to a secondary recipient site occurred in 12.5 percent of internal mammary reconstructions and 7 percent of thoracodorsal reconstructions. All converted internal mammary cases occurred in left-sided reconstructions and were attributable to problems with the veins. Overall, 20 percent of left-sided internal mammary reconstructions were found to have an inadequate recipient vein. Unusable thoracodorsal vessels were found only in delayed reconstructions, at a rate of 15 percent in the delayed setting. All flaps from converted procedures survived without complications. Average follow-up was 20 months, during which time there was one flap loss in the thoracodorsal group. There were no significant differences in complication rates between groups. Average aesthetic grade was 3.6 in each group. Postoperative recovery time and overall patient satisfaction were not significantly different between groups. Either recipient site can provide for a safe and acceptable result; however, surgeons should be aware of conversion rates and plan appropriately if recipient vessels appear unusable for free-tissue transfer.     

Postoperative adjuvant irradiation: effects on tranverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction

The use of postoperative irradiation following oncologic breast surgery is dictated by tumor pathology, margins, and lymph node involvement. Although irradiation negatively influences implant reconstruction, it is less clear what effect it has on autogenous tissue. This study evaluated the effect of postoperative irradiation on transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction. A retrospective review was performed on all patients undergoing immediate TRAM flap breast reconstruction followed by postoperative irradiation between 1988 and 1998. Forty-one patients with a median age of 48 years received an average of 50.99 Gy of fractionated irradiation within 6 months after breast reconstruction. All except two received adjuvant chemotherapy. Data were obtained from personal communication, physical examination, chart, and photographic review. The minimum follow-up time was 1 year, with an average of 3 years, after completion of radiation therapy. Nine patients received pedicled TRAM flaps and 32 received reconstruction with microvascular transfer. Fourteen patients had bilateral reconstruction, but irradiation was administered unilaterally to the breast with the higher risk of local recurrence. The remaining 27 patients had unilateral reconstruction. All patients were examined at least 1 year after radiotherapy. No flap loss occurred, but 10 patients (24 percent) required an additional flap to correct flap contracture. Nine patients (22 percent) maintained a normal breast volume. Hyperpigmentation occurred in 37 percent of the patients, and 56 percent were noted to have a firm reconstruction. Palpable fat necrosis was noted in 34 percent of the flaps and loss of symmetry in 78 percent. Because the numbers were small, there was no statistical difference between the pedicled and free TRAM group. However, as a group, the findings were statistically significant when compared with 1,443 nonirradiated TRAM patients. Despite the success of flap transfer, unpredictable volume, contour, and symmetry loss make it difficult to achieve consistent results using immediate TRAM breast reconstruction with postoperative irradiation. TRAM flap reconstruction in this setting should be approached cautiously, and delayed reconstruction in selected patients should be considered. Patients should be aware that multiple revisions and, possibly, additional flaps are necessary to correct the progressive deformity from radiation therapy.     

Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps

Breast reconstruction using the lower abdominal free superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap has the potential to virtually eliminate abdominal donor-site morbidity because the rectus abdominis fascia and muscle are not incised or excised. However, despite its advantages, the free SIEA flap for breast reconstruction is rarely used. A prospective study was conducted of the reliability and outcomes of the use of SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction compared with transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Breast reconstruction with an SIEA flap was attempted in 47 consecutive free autologous tissue breast reconstructions between August of 2001 and November of 2002. The average patient age was 49 years, and the average body mass index was 27 kg/m. The SIEA flap was used in 14 (30 percent) of these breast reconstructions in 12 patients. An SIEA flap was not used in the remaining 33 cases because the SIEA was absent or was deemed too small. The mean superficial inferior epigastric vessel pedicle length was approximately 7 cm. The internal mammary vessels were used as recipients in all SIEA flap cases so that the flap could be positioned sufficiently medially on the chest wall. The average hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with SIEA flaps than it was for those who underwent reconstruction with TRAM or DIEP flaps. Of the 47 free flaps, one SIEA flap was lost because of arterial thrombosis. Medium-size and large breasts were reconstructed with hemi-lower abdominal SIEA flaps, with aesthetic results similar to those obtained with TRAM and DIEP flaps. The free SIEA flap is an attractive option for autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Harvest of this flap does not injure the anterior rectus fascia or underlying rectus abdominis muscle. This can potentially eliminate abdominal donor-site complications such as bulge and hernia formation, and decrease weakness, discomfort, and hospital stay compared with TRAM and DIEP flaps. The disadvantages of an SIEA flap are a smaller pedicle diameter and shorter pedicle length than TRAM and DIEP flaps and the absence or inadequacy of an arterial pedicle in most patients. Nevertheless, in selected patients, the SIEA flap offers advantages over the TRAM and DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.     

Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction

Free pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction is often advocated as the procedure of choice for autogenous tissue breast reconstruction in high-risk patients, such as smokers. However, whether use of the free TRAM flap is a desirable option for breast reconstruction in smokers is still unclear. All patients undergoing breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps at our institution between February of 1989 and May of 1998 were reviewed. Patients were classified as smokers, former smokers (patients who had stopped smoking at least 4 weeks before surgery), and nonsmokers. Flap and donor-site complications in the three groups were compared. Information on demographic characteristics, body mass index, and comorbid medical conditions was used to perform multivariate statistical analysis. A total of 936 breast reconstructions with free TRAM flaps were performed in 718 patients (80.9 percent immediate; 23.3 percent bilateral). There were 478 nonsmokers, 150 former smokers, and 90 smokers. Flap complications occurred in 222 (23.7 percent) of 936 flaps. Smokers had a higher incidence of mastectomy flap necrosis than nonsmokers (18.9 percent versus 9.0 percent; p = 0.005). Smokers who underwent immediate reconstruction had a significantly higher incidence of mastectomy skin flap necrosis than did smokers who underwent delayed reconstruction (21.7 percent versus 0 percent; p = 0.039). Donor-site complications occurred in 106 (14.8 percent) of 718 patients. Donor-site complications were more common in smokers than in former smokers (25.6 percent versus 10.0 percent; p = 0.001) or nonsmokers (25.6 percent versus 14.2 percent; p = 0.007). Compared with nonsmokers, smokers had significantly higher rates of abdominal flap necrosis (4.4 percent versus 0.8 percent; p = 0.025) and hernia (6.7 percent versus 2.1 percent; p = 0.016). No significant difference in complication rates was noted between former smokers and nonsmokers. Among smokers, patients with a smoking history of greater than 10 pack-years had a significantly higher overall complication rate compared with patients with a smoking history of 10 or fewer pack-years (55.8 percent versus 23.8 percent; p = 0.049). In summary, free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in smokers was not associated with a significant increase in the rates of vessel thrombosis, flap loss, or fat necrosis compared with rates in nonsmokers. However, smokers were at significantly higher risk for mastectomy skin flap necrosis, abdominal flap necrosis, and hernia compared with nonsmokers. Patients with a smoking history of greater than 10 pack-years were at especially high risk for perioperative complications, suggesting that this should be considered a relative contraindication for free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Smoking-related complications were significantly reduced when the reconstruction was delayed or when the patient stopped smoking at least 4 weeks before surgery.     

Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?

The advantages of breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and the muscle-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap (MS-2) are well recognized. Both techniques optimize abdominal function by maintaining the vascularity, innervation, and continuity of the rectus abdominis muscle. The purpose of this study was to compare these two methods of breast reconstruction and determine whether there is a difference in outcome. The study considered 177 women who have had breast reconstruction using muscle-sparing flaps over a 4-year period. This includes 89 women who had an MS-2 free TRAM flap procedure, of which 65 were unilateral and 24 were bilateral, and 88 women who had a DIEP flap procedure, of which 66 were unilateral and 22 were bilateral. The total number of flaps was 223. Mean follow-up was 23 months (range, 3 to 49 months). For all MS-2 free TRAM flaps (n = 113), outcome included fat necrosis in eight (7.1 percent), venous congestion in three (2.7 percent), and total necrosis in two (1.8 percent). For the women who had an MS-2 free TRAM flap, an abdominal bulge occurred in three women (4.6 percent) after unilateral reconstruction and in five women (21 percent) after bilateral reconstruction. The ability to perform sit-ups was noted in 63 women (97 percent) after unilateral reconstruction and 20 women (83 percent) after bilateral reconstruction. For all DIEP flaps (n = 110), outcome included fat necrosis in seven (6.4 percent), venous congestion in five (4.5 percent), and total necrosis in three (2.7 percent) patients. For the women who had DIEP flap reconstruction, an abdominal bulge occurred in one woman (1.5 percent) after unilateral reconstruction and in one woman (4.5 percent) after bilateral reconstruction. The ability to perform sit-ups was noted in all women after unilateral reconstruction and in 21 women (95 percent) after bilateral reconstruction. These results demonstrate that there are no significant differences in fat necrosis, venous congestion, or flap necrosis after DIEP or MS-2 free TRAM flap reconstruction. The percentage of women who are able to perform sit-ups and the percentage of women who did not develop a postoperative abdominal bulge is increased after DIEP flap reconstruction; however, this difference is not statistically significant.     

Choice of recipient vessels in delayed TRAM flap breast reconstruction after radiotherapy

This study compared the use of the internal mammary and thoracodorsal recipient vessels in a uniform group of patients who underwent delayed TRAM flap reconstruction after radiotherapy, focusing on usability rates and outcomes. The authors identified 123 delayed TRAM flap patients who had undergone postmastectomy radiotherapy from a prospective database (1990 to 2001). Recipient vessel unusability rates were calculated on the basis of reports of inspection of a vessel, either by direct intraoperative dissection or by findings from color Doppler examination (internal mammary vessels only). Charts were reviewed for outcomes including flap loss, vascular complications, fat necrosis, and lymphedema; t-test and chi-square analyses were performed to compare outcomes and unusability rates, and multiple regression analysis was performed to determine factors influencing outcome. Of the 123 planned free TRAM flaps, 106 were completed as free flaps and 17 were performed as pedicled flaps because of unusable recipient vessels. Of the free flaps, 45 were anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels, 55 to the thoracodorsal vessels, and six to other vessels. The internal mammary and thoracodorsal groups did not differ significantly in body mass index, abdominal scars, smoking history, time delay between irradiation and TRAM flap reconstruction, or flap ischemia time. Radiation doses to the axilla (thoracodorsal), internal mammary chain, and supraclavicular fossa were similar between the groups. The internal mammary vessels were rejected in 11 (20 percent) of 56 cases, and the thoracodorsal vessels were rejected in 19 (26 percent) of 74 cases (p = 0.42). In cases with unusable internal mammary vessels, 46 percent (n = 5) had inadequate veins, 27 percent (n = 3) had inadequate arteries, and in 27 percent (n = 3) both vessels were inadequate. In the 19 cases with unusable thoracodorsal vessels, 84 percent (n = 16) were excessively scarred, 11 percent (n = 2) had inadequate vessels, and 5 percent (n = 1) were absent. Outcomes were similar regardless of recipient vessels used (internal mammary versus thoracodorsal): total flap loss, 0 percent versus 4 percent (p = 0.20); vascular complications, 6.7 percent versus 11 percent (p = 0.46); arm lymphedema, 4.4 percent versus 9 percent (p = 0.37); partial flap loss, 9 percent versus 6 percent (p = 0.54); and fat necrosis, 18 percent versus 15 percent (p = 0.69). Multivariate analysis revealed a trend for higher complication rates in smokers and with the use of the thoracodorsal vessels as the recipients. Overall, no discernible unusability or outcome differences were detected between the internal mammary and thoracodorsal groups.     

Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in patients undergoing free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction. All patients undergoing breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps at our institution from February 1, 1989, through May 31, 1998, were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups based on their body mass index: normal (body mass index <25), overweight (body mass index 25 to 29), obese (body mass index > or =30). Flap and donor-site complications in the three groups were compared. A total of 936 breast reconstructions with free TRAM flaps were performed in 718 patients. There were 442 (61.6 percent) normal-weight, 212 (29.5 percent) overweight, and 64 (8.9 percent) obese patients. Flap complications occurred in 222 of 936 flaps (23.7 percent). Compared with normal-weight patients, obese patients had a significantly higher rate of overall flap complications (39.1 versus 20.4 percent; p = 0.001), total flap loss (3.2 versus 0 percent; p = 0.001), flap seroma (10.9 versus 3.2 percent; p = 0.004), and mastectomy flap necrosis (21.9 versus 6.6 percent; p = 0.001). Similarly, overweight patients had a significantly higher rate of overall flap complications (27.8 versus 20.4 percent; p = 0.033), total flap loss (1.9 versus 0 percent p = 0.004), flap hematoma (0 versus 3.2 percent; p = 0.007), and mastectomy flap necrosis (15.1 versus 6.6 percent; p = 0.001) compared with normal-weight patients. Donor-site complications occurred in 106 of 718 patients (14.8 percent). Compared with normal-weight patients, obese patients had a significantly higher rate of overall donor-site complications (23.4 versus 11.1 percent; p = 0.005), infection (4.7 versus 0.5 percent; p = 0.016), seroma (9.4 versus 0.9 percent; p <0.001), and hernia (6.3 versus 1.6 percent; p = 0.039). Similarly, overweight patients had a significantly higher rate of overall donor-site complications (19.8 versus 11.1 percent; p = 0.003), infection (2.4 versus 0.5 percent; p = 0.039), bulge (5.2 versus 1.8 percent; p = 0.016), and hernia (4.3 versus 1.6 percent; p = 0.039) compared with normal-weight patients. There were no significant differences in age distribution, smoking history, or comorbid conditions among the three groups of patients. Obese patients, however, had a significantly higher incidence of preoperative radiotherapy and preoperative chemotherapy than did patients in the other two groups. A total of 23.4 percent of obese patients had preoperative radiation therapy compared with 12.3 percent of overweight patients and 12.4 percent of normal-weight patients; 34.4 percent of obese patients had preoperative chemotherapy compared with 24.5 percent of overweight patients and 17.7 percent of normal-weight patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for flap and donor-site complications while simultaneously controlling for potential confounding factors, including the incidence of preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In summary, obese and overweight patients undergoing breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps had significantly higher total flap loss, flap hematoma, flap seroma, mastectomy skin flap necrosis, donor-site infection, donor-site seroma, and hernia compared with normal-weight patients. There were no significant differences in the rate of partial flap loss, vessel thrombosis, fat necrosis, abdominal flap necrosis, or umbilical necrosis between any of the groups. The majority of overweight and even obese patients who undertake breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps complete the reconstruction successfully. Both such patients and surgeons, however, must clearly understand that the risk of failure and complications is higher than in normal-weight patients. Patients who are morbidly obese are at very high risk of failure and complications and should avoid any type of TRAM flap breast reconstruction.     

Usefulness of a first transferred free flap vascular pedicle for secondary microvascular reconstruction in the head and neck

The authors found that a previously transferred free flap vascular pedicle, distal to the first microvascular anastomosis, can be used as a recipient vessel for an additional free flap transfer. Free flap transfers were performed by using the standard procedure in patients with head and neck cancer. The mean age of the patients was 62 years. Five patients were men and three were women. A second free flap was transferred for secondary primary head and neck cancer in two cases, facial deformity in two cases, osteomyelitis of the skull in two cases, recurrent cancer in one case, and exposure of a mandibular reconstruction plate in one case. The interval between the two operations was from 4 months to 12 years (median, 21 months). All secondary free flaps were performed successfully. In two cases, the external jugular vein proximal to the previously anastomosed site was used for venous drainage. In another case, additional venous anastomosis was performed for flap congestion. It became clear that a previously transferred free flap vascular pedicle could be used as a recipient vessel for microvascular anastomosis. This is an excellent procedure for additional free flap transfers.     

Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient.

Obesity can be a contraindication for TRAM flap breast reconstruction. This study reviewed the authors' experience with free TRAM and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient to examine the complication rates associated with each reconstructive method and to determine whether TRAM flap reconstruction can safely be used in these high-risk patients. The records of 221 consecutive TRAM flap reconstructions were reviewed. Preoperative risk factors for morbidity were noted, as well as the incidence of TRAM flap success, operative time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Patients were categorized as obese if their body mass index was greater than 25.8 kg/m2. Data were tabulated using contingency tables and analyzed using chi-squared statistics. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for flap complications.Of the 221 patients studied, 114 patients were found to be obese (body mass index >25.8 kg/m2). Of these 114 patients, 78 were reconstructed with free TRAM flaps and 36 were reconstructed with pedicled flaps. In these obese patients, the average body mass index was 32 kg/m2 in the free TRAM and 30 kg/m2 in the pedicled TRAM flap reconstructions. There were no significant differences between groups with regard to age or preoperative risk factors. Length of hospital stay and operative time did not differ significantly between the two reconstructive methods. The average duration of follow-up was 24 months in both groups. Complications occurred in 26 percent of free TRAM flap reconstructions and 33 percent of pedicled reconstructions. There was no significant difference between reconstructive methods with regard to overall complication rates. Increasing body mass index was found to have a significant effect on free TRAM flap complications (p = 0.008) but not on pedicled TRAM flap complications. There were no partial or total flap losses in obese free TRAM flap patients; however, there was one case of total flap loss and four cases of partial flap loss in the obese pedicled TRAM flap group. The incidence of flap loss was significantly higher when pedicled TRAM flaps were used for reconstruction in obese patients (p = 0.04). Obese patients who underwent reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps were more likely to experience a complication if they also smoked (p = 0.001).There was no significant difference in operating time or length of stay when pedicled and free TRAM flap reconstructions in obese patients were compared. There were more cases of flap necrosis in the pedicled TRAM flap group. Free TRAM flaps may provide some benefit in reducing partial flap loss in obese patients, but overall complication rates were not significantly different between reconstructive methods. Of 114 patients, there was only one case of total reconstructive failure. From these findings, it seems that the free or pedicled TRAM flap can be used successfully for breast reconstruction in the majority of patients with obesity. Surgeons should use the technique with which they are most familiar to obtain consistent results.     

Immediate free TRAM reconstruction in lumpectomy and radiation failure patients

Local recurrence after lumpectomy and radiation therapy indicates failed breast conservation surgery. These patients often proceed to mastectomy and are candidates for autogenous breast reconstruction. Free transverse rectus abdominus muscle (TRAM) reconstruction in these patients is complicated by repeated axillary dissection and the use of irradiated tissue. Complication rates for pedicled TRAMs have been reported at 33 percent when used in irradiated tissue beds. We report our results using the free TRAM for breast reconstruction after lumpectomy and radiation failure. All patients within this study developed a local recurrence after lumpectomy and radiation therapy. All patients had undergone axillary dissection for staging at the time of their lumpectomy. Patient records were reviewed for patient age, total radiation dose, associated risk factors for TRAM failure, operative time, donor vessels used for anastomosis, status of the native thoracodorsal vessels at the time of surgery, and postoperative complications. Over a 7-year period, 16 TRAM patients had undergone previous breast conservation surgery. Of these 16 patients, 14 underwent reconstruction with a planned free TRAM after simple mastectomy. Average operating room time was 7 hours. There were no partial or total flap losses. Complications were seen in 14 percent of the overall group. Overall, we found that the free TRAM provided an excellent aesthetic result with a lower complication rate than previously reported for pedicled TRAM flaps in irradiated beds. The thoracodorsal vessels provided an adequate donor vessel in 93 percent of the cases. The free TRAM provides a superior alternative in immediate reconstruction in patients who have failed breast conservative surgery.     

The value of preoperative Doppler sonography for planning free perforator flaps

The individual perforating vessels have a high degree of anatomical variation, therefore it is desirable to conduct a careful examination of them before undertaking a perforator flap operation. Because locating the vessels beforehand makes performing the operative procedure much easier, the aim of the present study was to assess the value of using simple acoustic Doppler sonography to plan a perforator flap operation. The vessel examinations were carried out before taking 46 free microvascular flaps from either the lower abdominal wall or the buttock for reconstructive breast surgery. The perforating vessels located were marked, and their position relative to the umbilicus or the most cranial point of the rima ani recorded using a coordinate system. In 40 patients, a perforator flap operation (deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, n = 32; superior gluteal artery perforator flap, n = 8) was actually carried out; in six of these patients, a myocutaneous flap was used because of the insufficient availability of perforating vessels. Before the operation, perforating vessels were marked for each patient, with an average of 7.3 for the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and 6.5 for the superior gluteal artery perforator flap. Out of 286 vessels marked for later perforator flaps, 162 were identified during the operation. A preoperatively marked vessel was used in 37 of 40 patients. In the remaining patients, a vessel was used that had not been previously marked. The vertical and horizontal distance between the perforating vessels identified during the operation and the preoperative marks averaged 0.8 cm. The results show preoperative Doppler sonography to be useful for locating the position of individual perforating vessels, making it much easier to find them during the operation.