Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases

The S phase checkpoint pathway preserves genome stability by protecting defective DNA replication forks, but the underlying mechanisms are still understood poorly. Previous work with budding yeast suggested that the checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Rad53 might prevent collapse of the replisome when nucleotide concentrations are limiting, thereby allowing the subsequent resumption of DNA synthesis. Here we describe a direct analysis of replisome stability in budding yeast cells lacking checkpoint kinases, together with a high-resolution view of replisome progression across the genome. Surprisingly, we find that the replisome is stably associated with DNA replication forks following replication stress in the absence of Mec1 or Rad53. A component of the replicative DNA helicase is phosphorylated within the replisome in a Mec1-dependent manner upon replication stress, and our data indicate that checkpoint kinases control replisome function rather than stability, as part of a multifaceted response that allows cells to survive defects in chromosome replication.     

The Pds1 anaphase inhibitor and Mec1 kinase define distinct checkpoints coupling S phase with mitosis in budding yeast

In most eukaryotic cells, DNA replication is confined to S phase of the cell cycle [1]. During this interval, S-phase checkpoint controls restrain mitosis until replication is complete [2]. In budding yeast, the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p has been associated with the checkpoint arrest of mitosis when DNA is damaged or when mitotic spindles have formed aberrantly [3] [4], but not when DNA replication is blocked with hydroxyurea (HU). Previous studies have implicated the protein kinase Mec1p in S-phase checkpoint control [5]. Unlike mec1 mutants, pds1 mutants efficiently inhibit anaphase when replication is blocked. This does not, however, exclude an essential S-phase checkpoint function of Pds1 beyond the early S-phase arrest point of a HU block. Here, we show that Pds1p is an essential component of a previously unsuspected checkpoint control system that couples the completion of S phase with mitosis. Further, the S-phase checkpoint comprises at least two distinct pathways. A Mec1p-dependent pathway operates early in S phase, but a Pds1p-dependent pathway becomes essential part way through S phase.     

Yet another job for Dna2: Checkpoint activation

Mec1 (ATR in humans) is the principal kinase responsible for checkpoint activation in response to replication stress and DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Checkpoint initiation requires stimulation of Mec1 kinase activity by specific activators. The complexity of checkpoint initiation in yeast increases with the complexity of chromosomal states during the different phases of the cell cycle. In G1 phase, the checkpoint clamp 9–1–1 is both necessary and sufficient for full activation of Mec1 kinase whereas in G2/M, robust checkpoint function requires both 9–1–1 and the replisome assembly protein Dpb11 (human TopBP1). A third activator, Dna2, is employed specifically during S phase to stimulate Mec1 kinase and to initiate the replication checkpoint. Dna2 is an essential nuclease–helicase that is required for proper Okazaki fragment maturation, for double-strand break repair, and for protecting stalled replication forks. Remarkably, all three Mec1 activators use an unstructured region of the protein, containing two critically important aromatic residues, in order to activate Mec1. A role for these checkpoint activators in channeling aberrant replication structures into checkpoint complexes is discussed.     

Yeast pip3/mec3 mutants fail to delay entry into S phase and to slow DNA replication in response to DNA damage, and they define a functional link between Mec3 and DNA primase.

The catalytic DNA primase subunit of the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex is encoded by the essential PRI1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To identify factors that functionally interact with yeast DNA primase in living cells, we developed a genetic screen for mutants that are lethal at the permissive temperature in a cold-sensitive pril-2 genetic background. Twenty-four recessive mutations belonging to seven complementation groups were identified. Some mutants showed additional phenotypes, such as increased sensitivity to UV irradiation, methyl methanesulfonate, and hydroxyurea, that were suggestive of defects in DNA repair and/or checkpoint mechanisms. We have cloned and characterized the gene of one complementation group, PIP3, whose product is necessary both for delaying entry into S phase or mitosis when cells are UV irradiated in G1 or G2 phase and for lowering the rate of ongoing DNA synthesis in the presence of methyl methanesulfonate. PIP3 turned out to be the MEC3 gene, previously identified as a component of the G2 DNA damage checkpoint. The finding that Mec3 is also required for the G1- and S-phase DNA damage checkpoints, together with the analysis of genetic interactions between a mec3 null allele and several conditional DNA replication mutations at the permissive temperature, suggests that Mec3 could be part of a mechanism coupling DNA replication with repair of DNA damage, and DNA primase might be involved in this process.     

Three Different Pathways Prevent Chromosome Segregation in the Presence of DNA Damage or Replication Stress in Budding Yeast

A surveillance mechanism, the S phase checkpoint, blocks progression into mitosis in response to DNA damage and replication stress. Segregation of damaged or incompletely replicated chromosomes results in genomic instability. In humans, the S phase checkpoint has been shown to constitute an anti-cancer barrier. Inhibition of mitotic cyclin dependent kinase (M-CDK) activity by Wee1 kinases is critical to block mitosis in some organisms. However, such mechanism is dispensable in the response to genotoxic stress in the model eukaryotic organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show here that the Wee1 ortholog Swe1 does indeed inhibit M-CDK activity and chromosome segregation in response to genotoxic insults. Swe1 dispensability in budding yeast is the result of a redundant control of M-CDK activity by the checkpoint kinase Rad53. In addition, our results indicate that Swe1 is an effector of the checkpoint central kinase Mec1. When checkpoint control on M-CDK and on Pds1/securin stabilization are abrogated, cells undergo aberrant chromosome segregation.     

Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway

DNA damage checkpoints lead to the inhibition of cell cycle progression following DNA damage. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mec1 checkpoint protein, a phosphatidylinositol kinase-related protein, is required for transient cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage or DNA replication defects. We show that mec1 kinase-deficient (mec1kd) mutants are indistinguishable from mec1Delta cells, indicating that the Mec1 conserved kinase domain is required for all known Mec1 functions, including cell viability and proper DNA damage response. Mec1kd variants maintain the ability to physically interact with both Ddc2 and wild-type Mec1 and cause dominant checkpoint defects when overproduced in MEC1 cells, impairing the ability of cells to slow down S phase entry and progression after DNA damage in G(1) or during S phase. Conversely, an excess of Mec1kd in MEC1 cells does not abrogate the G(2)/M checkpoint, suggesting that Mec1 functions required for response to aberrant DNA structures during specific cell cycle stages can be separable. In agreement with this hypothesis, we describe two new hypomorphic mec1 mutants that are completely defective in the G(1)/S and intra-S DNA damage checkpoints but properly delay nuclear division after UV irradiation in G(2). The finding that these mutants, although indistinguishable from mec1Delta cells with respect to the ability to replicate a damaged DNA template, do not lose viability after UV light and methyl methanesulfonate treatment suggests that checkpoint impairments do not necessarily result in hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents.     

Differential regulation of homologous recombination at DNA breaks and replication forks by the Mrc1 branch of the S‐phase checkpoint

The Rad52 pathway has a central function in the recombinational repair of chromosome breaks and in the recovery from replication stress. Tolerance to replication stress also depends on the Mec1 kinase, which activates the DNA replication checkpoint in an Mrc1‐dependent manner in response to fork arrest. Although the Mec1 and Rad52 pathways are initiated by the same single‐strand DNA (ssDNA) intermediate, their interplay at stalled forks remains largely unexplored. Here, we show that the replication checkpoint suppresses the formation of Rad52 foci in an Mrc1‐dependent manner and prevents homologous recombination (HR) at chromosome breaks induced by the HO endonuclease. This repression operates at least in part by impeding resection of DNA ends, which is essential to generate 3′ ssDNA tails, the primary substrate of HR. Interestingly, we also observed that the Mec1 pathway does not prevent recombination at stalled forks, presumably because they already contain ssDNA. Taken together, these data indicate that the DNA replication checkpoint suppresses genomic instability in S phase by blocking recombination at chromosome breaks and permitting helpful recombination at stalled forks.     

Esc4p, a new target of Mec1p (ATR), promotes resumption of DNA synthesis after DNA damage

The DNA damage-responsive protein kinases ATM and ATR phosphorylate SQ/TQ motifs that lie in clusters in most of their in vivo targets. Budding yeast Esc4p contains a cluster of SQ/TQ motifs, suggesting that it might be a target of Mec1p/Tel1p (yeast ATR/ATM). Here it is reported that Esc4p is phosphorylated by Mec1p in response to DNA damage during DNA replication and that cells lacking Esc4p are hypersensitive to DNA damage specifically during S phase. Esc4p is not required for the intra-S-phase checkpoint but is essential for resumption of chromosome replication after DNA damage, and its role in promoting restart appears to be distinct from that of Rad53p. Mutation of Esc4p SQ/TQ motifs phosphorylated by Mec1p or mutation of the BRCT domains of Esc4p also renders cells unable to restart DNA replication after DNA damage and causes hypersensitivity to genotoxins. These results identify Esc4p as an important new S-phase-specific target of Mec1p.     

G1/S and G2/M Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Activities Commit Cells to Death in the Absence of the S-Phase Checkpoint

The Mec1 and Rad53 protein kinases are essential for budding yeast cell viability and are also required to activate the S-phase checkpoint, which supports DNA replication under stress conditions. Whether these two functions are related to each other remains to be determined, and the nature of the replication stress-dependent lethality of mec1 and rad53 mutants is still unclear. We show here that a decrease in cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) activity alleviates the lethal effects of mec1 and rad53 mutations both in the absence and in the presence of replication stress, indicating that the execution of a certain Cdk1-mediated event(s) is detrimental in the absence of Mec1 and Rad53. This lethality involves Cdk1 functions in both G₁ and mitosis. In fact, delaying either the G₁/S transition or spindle elongation in mec1 and rad53 mutants allows their survival both after exposure to hydroxyurea and under unperturbed conditions. Altogether, our studies indicate that inappropriate entry into S phase and segregation of incompletely replicated chromosomes contribute to cell death when the S-phase checkpoint is not functional. Moreover, these findings suggest that the essential function of Mec1 and Rad53 is not necessarily separated from the function of these kinases in supporting DNA synthesis under stress conditions.     

Cell-cycle-specific activators of the Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinase

Mec1 [ATR (ataxia telangiectasia mutated- and Rad3-related) in humans] is the principle kinase responsible for checkpoint activation in response to replication stress and DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The heterotrimeric checkpoint clamp, 9-1-1 (checkpoint clamp of Rad9, Rad1 and Hus1 in humans and Ddc1, Rad17 and Mec3 in S. cerevisiae; Ddc1-Mec3-Rad17) and the DNA replication initiation factor Dpb11 (human TopBP1) are the two known activators of Mec1. The 9-1-1 clamp functions in checkpoint activation in G1- and G2-phase, but its employment differs between these two phases of the cell cycle. The Ddc1 (human Rad9) subunit of the clamp directly activates Mec1 in G1-phase, an activity identified only in S. cerevisiae so far. However, in G2-phase, the 9-1-1 clamp activates the checkpoint by two mechanisms. One mechanism includes direct activation of Mec1 by the unstructured C-terminal tail of Ddc1. The second mech-anism involves the recruitment of Dpb11 by the phosphorylated C-terminal tail of Ddc1. The latter mechanism is highly conserved and also functions in response to replication stress in higher eukaryotes. In S. cerevisiae, however, both the 9-1-1 clamp and the Dpb11 are partially redundant for checkpoint activation in response to replication stress, suggesting the existence of additional activators of Mec1.     

Rad52 recruitment is DNA replication independent and regulated by Cdc28 and the Mec1 kinase

Recruitment of the homologous recombination machinery to sites of double‐strand breaks is a cell cycle‐regulated event requiring entry into S phase and CDK1 activity. Here, we demonstrate that the central recombination protein, Rad52, forms foci independent of DNA replication, and its recruitment requires B‐type cyclin/CDK1 activity. Induction of the intra‐S‐phase checkpoint by hydroxyurea (HU) inhibits Rad52 focus formation in response to ionizing radiation. This inhibition is dependent upon Mec1/Tel1 kinase activity, as HU‐treated cells form Rad52 foci in the presence of the PI3 kinase inhibitor caffeine. These Rad52 foci colocalize with foci formed by the replication clamp PCNA. These results indicate that Mec1 activity inhibits the recruitment of Rad52 to both sites of DNA damage and stalled replication forks during the intra‐S‐phase checkpoint. We propose that B‐type cyclins promote the recruitment of Rad52 to sites of DNA damage, whereas Mec1 inhibits spurious recombination at stalled replication forks.     

Blockage of antiviral induction of interferon by homologous cell biochemical activity: effect of chicken embryo fibroblast mitotic cell cycle phases on Sindbis virus growth

The antiviral activity of interferon, measured as the reduction of viral yield, was studied as a function of the cell cycle phases. The present study shows that cells which are about to enter DNA replication phase S and cells that are in mitosis phase M are not refractive to viral infection when treated with interferon. The growth of Sindbis virus, used as the challenger, dropped considerably at the G1-S junction, at mitosis phase M, and as cells entered into a deeper quiescent state.     

DNA replication checkpoint prevents precocious chromosome segregation by regulating spindle behavior

The DNA replication checkpoint maintains replication fork integrity and prevents chromosome segregation during replication stresses. Mec1 and Rad53 (human ATM/ATR- and Chk2-like kinases, respectively) are critical effectors of this pathway in yeast. When treated with replication inhibitors, checkpoint-deficient mec1 or rad53 mutant fails to maintain replication fork integrity and proceeds to partition unreplicated chromosomes. We show that this unnatural chromosome segregation requires neither the onset of mitosis nor APC activation, cohesin cleavage, or biorientation of kinetochores. Instead, the checkpoint deficiency leads to deregulation of microtubule-associated proteins Cin8 and Stu2, which, in the absence of both chromosome cohesion and bipolar attachment of kinetochores to microtubules, induce untimely spindle elongation, causing premature chromosome separation. The checkpoint's ability to prevent nuclear division is abolished by combined deficiency of microtubule-destabilizing motor Kip3 and Mad2 functions. Thus, the DNA replication checkpoint prevents precocious chromosome segregation, not by inhibiting entry into mitosis as widely believed, but by directly regulating spindle dynamics.     

The S‐phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork

The S‐phase checkpoint is a surveillance mechanism, mediated by the protein kinases Mec1 and Rad53 in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ATR and Chk2 in human cells, respectively) that responds to DNA damage and replication perturbations by co‐ordinating a global cellular response necessary to maintain genome integrity. A key aspect of this response is the stabilization of DNA replication forks, which is critical for cell survival. A defective checkpoint causes irreversible replication‐fork collapse and leads to genomic instability, a hallmark of cancer cells. Although the precise mechanisms by which Mec1/Rad53 maintain functional replication forks are currently unclear, our knowledge about this checkpoint function has significantly increased during the last years. Focusing mainly on the advances obtained in S. cerevisiae, the present review will summarize our understanding of how the S‐phase checkpoint preserves the integrity of DNA replication forks and discuss the most recent findings on this topic.     

Protein kinase A is required for chromosomal DNA replication.

Passage through mitosis resets cells for a new round of chromosomal DNA replication [1]. In late mitosis, the pre-replication complex - which includes the origin recognition complex (ORC), Cdc6 and the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins - binds chromatin as a pre-requisite for DNA replication. S-phase-promoting cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) and the kinase Dbf4-Cdc7 then act to initiate replication. Before the onset of replication Cdc6 dissociates from chromatin. S-phase and M-phase Cdks block the formation of a new pre-replication complex, preventing DNA over-replication during the S, G2 and M phases of the cell cycle [1]. The nuclear membrane also contributes to limit genome replication to once per cell cycle [2]. Thus, at the end of M phase, nuclear membrane breakdown and the collapse of Cdk activity reset cells for a new round of chromosomal replication. We showed previously that protein kinase A (PKA) activity oscillates during the cell cycle in Xenopus egg extracts, peaking in late mitosis. The oscillations are induced by the M-phase-promoting Cdk [3] [4]. Here, we found that PKA oscillation was required for the following phase of DNA replication. PKA activity was needed from mitosis exit to the formation of the nuclear envelope. PKA was not required for the assembly of ORC2, Cdc6 and MCM3 onto chromatin. Inhibition of PKA activity, however, blocked the release of Cdc6 from chromatin and subsequent DNA replication. These data suggest that PKA activation in late M phase is required for the following S phase.     

A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response

The checkpoint proteins Rad53 and Mec1-Ddc2 regulate many aspects of cell metabolism in response to DNA damage. We have examined the relative importance of downstream checkpoint effectors on cell viability. Checkpoint regulation of mitosis, gene expression, and late origin firing make only modest contributions to viability. By contrast, the checkpoint is essential for preventing irreversible breakdown of stalled replication forks. Moreover, recruitment of Ddc2 to nuclear foci and subsequent activation of the Rad53 kinase only occur during S phase and require the assembly of replication forks. Thus, DNA replication forks are both activators and primary effectors of the checkpoint pathway in S phase.     

The concentration-dependent diversity of effects of DNA topoisomerase I and II inhibitors on the cell cycle of HL-60 cells.

Exposure of promyelocytic leukemic HL-60 cells to 3-60 nM of the DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin (CAM) or to 30-450 nM and 0.12-1.5 microM of DNA topoisomerase II inhibitors teniposide (TN) and 4-(9-acridynylamino)-3-methanesulfon-m-anisidide (m-AMSA), respectively, resulted in two distinct kinetic effects: (1) the cells entered S phase but the rate of DNA replication was reduced in proportion to the inhibitor concentration; (2) the transition from G2 to M was impaired, approximately 1 h after addition of the inhibitor. As a consequence, the cells accumulated in the S (preferentially in early S) and in G2 phases of the cell cycle. Whereas CAM was more efficient in suppressing cell progression through S phase, TN and m-AMSA were more potent G2 blockers. At these low inhibitor concentrations no signs of immediate cytotoxicity or DNA degradation were apparent. However, above 145 nM of CAM, 900 nM of TN, or 2 microM of m-AMSA extensive DNA degradation in nuclei of S phase cells was evident within 6 h of addition of the inhibitor, resulting in the loss of S and G2 + M cells from these cultures. The data indicate that depending on concentration, mechanisms mediating the cytostatic/cytotoxic activity of both DNA topoisomerase I and II inhibitors may be quite different. Suppression of the DNA replication and the G2 to M transition, seen at low inhibitor concentrations, is compatible with the assumption that the inhibitor-induced stabilization of the topoisomerase-DNA cleavable complexes interferes with DNA replication and chromosome condensation/segregation, respectively. Above the threshold concentration for each inhibitor, an endonucleolytic activity is triggered, resulting in rapid DNA degradation in nuclei of S and G2 phase cells. The endonucleolytic effect is not only cell cycle phase-specific but is also modulated by tissue-specific factors because it cannot be observed, e.g., in the lymphocytic leukemic cell lines.     

Sensing of replication stress and Mec1 activation act through two independent pathways involving the 9-1-1 complex and DNA polymerase ε

Following DNA damage or replication stress, budding yeast cells activate the Rad53 checkpoint kinase, promoting genome stability in these challenging conditions. The DNA damage and replication checkpoint pathways are partially overlapping, sharing several factors, but are also differentiated at various levels. The upstream kinase Mec1 is required to activate both signaling cascades together with the 9-1-1 PCNA-like complex and the Dpb11 (hTopBP1) protein. After DNA damage, Dpb11 is also needed to recruit the adaptor protein Rad9 (h53BP1). Here we analyzed the mechanisms leading to Mec1 activation in vivo after DNA damage and replication stress. We found that a ddc1Δdpb11-1 double mutant strain displays a synthetic defect in Rad53 and H2A phosphorylation and is extremely sensitive to hydroxyurea (HU), indicating that Dpb11 and the 9-1-1 complex independently promote Mec1 activation. A similar phenotype is observed when both the 9-1-1 complex and the Dpb4 non-essential subunit of DNA polymerase ε (Polε) are contemporarily absent, indicating that checkpoint activation in response to replication stress is achieved through two independent pathways, requiring the 9-1-1 complex and Polε.     

High levels of Cdc7 and Dbf4 proteins can arrest cell-cycle progression

Cdc7-Dbf4 serine/threonine kinase is essential for initiation of DNA replication. It was previously found that overexpression of certain replication proteins such as Cdc6 and Cdt1 in fission yeast resulted in multiple rounds of DNA replication in the absence of mitosis. Since this phenomenon is dependent upon the presence of wild-type Cdc7/Hsk1, we hypothesized that high levels of Cdc7 and/or Dbf4 could also cause multiple rounds of DNA replication, or could facilitate entry into S phase. To test this hypothesis, we transiently overexpressed hamster Cdc7, Dbf4 or both in CHO cells. Direct observations of individual cells by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometric analysis on cell populations suggest that overexpression of Cdc7 and/or Dbf4 does not result in multiple rounds of DNA replication or facilitating entry into S phase. In contrast, moderately increased levels of Dbf4, but not Cdc7, cause cell-cycle arrest in G2/M. This G2/M arrest coincides with hyperphosphorylation of Cdc2/Cdk1 at Tyr-15, raising the possibility that high levels of Dbf4 may activate a G2/M cell-cycle checkpoint. Further increase in Cdc7 and/or Dbf4 by 2–4 fold can arrest cells in G1 and significantly slow down S-phase progression for the cells already in S phase.     

Late S phase-specific recruitment of Mre11 complex triggers hierarchical assembly of telomere replication proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, telomere replication occurs in late S phase and is accompanied by dynamic remodeling of its protein components. Here, we show that MRX (Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2), an evolutionarily conserved protein complex involved in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, is recruited to the telomeres in late S phase. MRX is required for the late S phase-specific recruitment of ATR-like kinase Mec1 to the telomeres. Mec1, in turn, contributes to the assembly of the telomerase regulators Cdc13 and Est1 at the telomere ends. Our results provide a model for the hierarchical assembly of telomere-replication proteins in late S phase; this involves triggering by the loading of MRX onto the chromosome termini. The recruitment of DNA repair-related proteins to the telomeres at particular times in the cell cycle suggests that the normal terminus of a chromosome is recognized as a DSB during the course of replication.