Biologically Closed Electrical Circuits in Venus Flytrap

The Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis) is a marvel of plant electrical, mechanical, and biochemical engineering. The rapid closure of the Venus flytrap upper leaf in about 0.1 s is one of the fastest movements in the plant kingdom. We found earlier that the electrical stimulus between a midrib and a lobe closes the Venus flytrap upper leaf without mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs. The Venus flytrap can accumulate small subthreshold charges and, when the threshold value is reached, the trap closes. Here, we investigated the electrical properties of the upper leaf of the Venus flytrap and proposed the equivalent electrical circuit in agreement with the experimental data.     

Closing of Venus Flytrap by Electrical Stimulation of Motor Cells

Electrical signaling and rapid closure of the carnivorous plant Dionaea muscipula Ellis (Venus flytrap) have been attracting the attention of researchers since XIX century, but the exact mechanism of Venus flytrap closure is still unknown. We found that the electrical stimulus between a midrib and a lobe closes the Venus flytrap leaf by activating motor cells without mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs. The closing time of Venus flytrap by electrical stimulation of motor cells is 0.3 s, the same as mechanically induced closing. The mean electrical charge required for the closure of the Venus flytrap leaf is 13.6 µC. Ion channel blockers such as Ba²⁺, TEACl as well as uncouplers such as FCCP, 2,4-dinitrophenol and pentachlorophenol dramatically decrease the speed of the trap closing. Using an ultra-fast data acquisition system with measurements in real time, we found that the action potential in the Venus flytrap has a duration time of about 1.5 ms. Our results demonstrate that electrical stimulation can be used to study mechanisms of fast activity in motor cells of the plant kingdom.Key Words: action potential, electrophysiology, electrical signaling, Venus flytrap, motor cells     

Nonlinear Dynamics of the Movement of the Venus Flytrap

The Venus flytrap has long been regarded as one of the most amazing examples of movement in the plant kingdom. The trapping ability of the flytrap consists of three unique features. First, trap closure represents one of the fastest movements in the plant kingdom. Second, a decision-making stage allows the plant to "decide" whether to completely close or open the trap, based on stimuli provided from the trapped object. Finally, the Venus flytrap contains a "memory function" that requires two mechanical stimuli within about 30 seconds to initiate trap closure. The movement involved in trap closure consists of nonlinear dynamics that have not been well understood. By understanding the movement, through nonlinear dynamics analysis, it will be possible to better understand this biological process. A mathematical model describing the movement of the Venus flytrap was first proposed by the authors in Yang et?al., Plant Signal. Behav. 5(8), 968-978 (2010). In the current work, the earlier research has been advanced and an in-depth nonlinear and control analysis of the dynamic process has been provided.     

Energetics and forces of the Dionaea muscipula trap closing

The Venus flytrap is the most famous carnivorous plant. The electrical stimulus between a midrib and a lobe closes the Venus flytrap upper leaf in 0.3 s without mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs. Here we present results for direct measurements of the closing force of the trap of Dionaea muscipula Ellis after mechanical or electrical stimulation of the trap using the piezoelectric thin film or Fuji Prescale indicating sensor film. The closing force was 0.14 N and the corresponding pressure between rims of two lobes was 38 kPa. We evaluated theoretically using the Hydroelastic Curvature Model and compared with experimental data velocity, acceleration and kinetic energy from the time dependencies of distance between rims of lobes during the trap closing. The Charge Stimulation Method was used for trap electrostimulation between the midrib and lobes. From the dependence of voltage between two Ag/AgCl electrodes in the midrib and one of the lobes, we estimated electrical charge, current, resistance, electrical energy and electrical power dependencies on time during electrostimulation of the trap.     

Venus flytrap biomechanics: Forces in the Dionaea muscipula trap

Biomechanics of morphing structures in the Venus flytrap has attracted the attention of scientists during the last 140 years. The trap closes in a tenth of a second if a prey touches a trigger hair twice. The driving force of the closing process is most likely due to the elastic curvature energy stored and locked in the leaves, which is caused by a pressure differential between the upper and lower layers of the leaf. The trap strikes, holds and compresses the prey. We have developed new methods for measuring all these forces involved in the hunting cycle. We made precise calibration of the piezoelectric sensor and performed direct measurements of the average impact force of the trap closing using a high speed video camera for the determination of time constants. The new equation for the average impact force was derived. The impact average force between rims of two lobes in the Venus flytrap was found equal to 149 mN and the corresponding pressure between the rims was about 41 kPa. Direct measurements of the constriction force in the trap of Dionaea muscipula was performed during gelatin digestion. This force increases in the process of digestion from zero to 450 mN with maximal constriction pressure created by the lobes reaching to 9 kPa. The insects and different small prey have little chance to escape after the snap of the trap. The prey would need to overpower the “escaping” force which is very strong and can reach up to 4 N.     

Complete hunting cycle of Dionaea muscipula: Consecutive steps and their electrical properties

The total hunting cycle of the Venus flytrap consists of five stages: 1. Open state → 2. Closed state → 3. Locked state → 4. Constriction and digestion → 5. Semi-open state → 1. Open state. The opening of the trap after digestion consists of two steps: opening of the lobes, and changing of their curvature from concave to convex shape. Uncouplers carbonylcyanide-4-trifluoromethoxyphenyl hydrazone (FCCP) and carbonylcyanide-3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) inhibit the trap from opening for two weeks and antracene-9-carboxylic acid inhibits the trap from constricting. Different stages of the hunting cycle have different electrical characteristics. The biologically closed electrochemical circuits in the Venus flytrap are analyzed using the charged capacitor method. If the initial voltage applied to the Venus flytrap is 0.5 V or greater, changing the polarity of the electrodes between the midrib and one of the lobes results in a rectification effect and in different kinetics of discharge capacitance. These effects can be caused by the fast transport of ions through ion channels. The electrical properties of the Venus flytrap were investigated and equivalent electrical circuits within the upper leaf were proposed to explain the experimental data.     

Electrotonic and action potentials in the Venus flytrap

The electrical phenomena and morphing structures in the Venus flytrap have attracted researchers since the nineteenth century. We have observed that mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs on the lobes of the Venus flytrap induces electrotonic potentials in the lower leaf. Electrostimulation of electrical circuits in the Venus flytrap can induce electrotonic potentials propagating along the upper and lower leaves. The instantaneous increase or decrease in voltage of stimulating potential generates a nonlinear electrical response in plant tissues. Any electrostimulation that is not instantaneous, such as sinusoidal or triangular functions, results in linear responses in the form of small electrotonic potentials. The amplitude and sign of electrotonic potentials depend on the polarity and the amplitude of the applied voltage. Electrical stimulation of the lower leaf induces electrical signals, which resemble action potentials, in the trap between the lobes and the midrib. The trap closes if the stimulating voltage is above the threshold level of 4.4 V. Electrical responses in the Venus flytrap were analyzed and reproduced in the discrete electrical circuit. The information gained from this study can be used to elucidate the coupling of intracellular and intercellular communications in the form of electrical signals within plants.     

Plant electrical memory

Electrical signaling, short-term memory and rapid closure of the carnivorous plant Dionaea muscipula Ellis (Venus flytrap) have been attracting the attention of researchers since the XIX century. We found that the electrical stimulus between a midrib and a lobe closes the Venus flytrap upper leaf without mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs. The closing time of Venus flytrap by electrical stimulation is the same as mechanically induced closing. Transmission of a single electrical charge between a lobe and the midrib causes closure of the trap and induces an electrical signal propagating between both lobes and midrib. The Venus flytrap can accumulate small subthreshold charges, and when the threshold value is reached, the trap closes. Repeated application of smaller charges demonstrates the summation of stimuli. The cumulative character of electrical stimuli points to the existence of short-term electrical memory in the Venus flytrap.Key words: plant memory, electrophysiology, electrical signaling, venus flytrap, Dionaea muscipula ellisPlants are capable of intelligent responses to complex environmental signals.^1–27 Signaling and memory play fundamental roles in plant responses. The existence of different forms of plant memory is well known.^1–22 Depending on the duration of memory retention, there are three types of memory in plants: sensory memory, short term memory and long term memory. A few examples of studies involving plant memory are: transgeneration memory of stress,^1,6,10 immunological memory of tobacco plants²² and mountain birches,¹⁸ storage and recall functions in seedlings,⁹ chromatin remodelling in plant development,^4,19 vernalization and epigenetic memory of winter,^12,13 induced resistance and susceptibility to herbivory,² memory response in ABA-entrained plants,⁶ memory of stimulus,^16,17 and systematic acquired resistance in plants exposed to a pathogen.²² Cellular memory is an example of long term memory and is a long-term maintenance of a particular pattern of gene expression. Chromatin dynamics including histone modification, histone replacement and chromatin remodeling play key roles in cellular memory.⁴ Plants are intelligent organisms and capable of functions such as learning, individuality, plasticity and memory.⁵ There are a few mathematical models of plant learning and memory.^14,15 Some plants exhibit clues of an electrical memory as well.We found that Venus flytrap has a short term electrical memory^20,21 Rapid closure of the carnivorous plant Dionaea muscipula Ellis (Venus flytrap) has been attracting the attention of researchers and as a result its mechanism has been widely investigated. When an insect touches the trigger hairs, these mechanosensors generate an electrical signal that acts as an action potential, which activates the trap closing. Macfarlane²³ found that two mechanical stimuli required for the trap closing should be applied within an interval from 0.75 s to 20 s. Brown and Sharp²⁴ found that at high temperature of 35–40°C usually only one mechanical stimulus is required.The inducement of non-excitability after excitation and the summation of subthreshold irritations were developed in the vegetative and animal kingdoms in protoplasmic structures prior to morphological differentiation of nervous tissues. These protoplasmic structures merged into the organs of a nervous system and adjusted the interfacing of the organism with the environment. Some neuromotoric components include acetylcholine neurotransmitters, cellular messenger calmodulin, cellular motors actin and myosin, voltage-gated channels, and sensors for touch, light, gravity and temperature.^25–27 Although this nerve-like cellular equipment has not reached the same great complexity as in animal nerves, a simple neural network has been formed within the plasma membrane of a phloem or plasmodesmata enabling it to communicate efficiently over long distances.^5,26,27 The reason why plants have developed pathways for electrical signal transmission most probably lies in the necessity to respond rapidly to environmental stress factors. Different environmental stimuli evoke specific responses in living cells, which have the capacity to transmit a signal to the responding region. In contrast to chemical signals such as hormones, electrical signals are able to rapidly transmit information over long distances.²⁷ Electrical potentials have been measured at the tissue and whole plant levels.²⁶Using our new charge injection method,²⁰ it was evident that the application of an electrical stimulus between the midrib (positive potential) and a lobe (negative potential) causes Venus flytrap to close the trap without any mechanical stimulation. The average stimulation pulse voltage sufficient for rapid closure of the Venus flytrap was 1.50 V (standard deviation is 0.01 V, n = 50) for 1 s. The inverted polarity pulse with negative voltage applied to the midrib did not close the plant. Applying impulses in the same voltage range with different polarities for pulses of up to 100 s did not open the plant. It was found that energy for trap closure is generated by ATP hydrolysis. ATP is used by the motor cells for a fast transport of protons. The amount of ATP drops from 950 µM per midrib before mechanical stimulation to 650 µM per midrib after stimulation and closure.²⁸ However, it is not clear if electrical stimulation triggers closing process in the motor cells, or contributes energy to the closing action.The action potential delivers sufficient electrical charge to the midrib,²¹ which can activate the osmotic motor. To check this hypothesis, we measured effects of transmitted charge from the charged capacitors between the lobe and the midrib of Venus flytrap. Transmission of a single electrical charge (mean 13.63 µC, median 14.00 µC, std. dev. 1.51 µC, n = 41) causes trap closure and induces an electrical signal propagating between the lobes and the midrib. The electrical signal in the lobes was not an action potential, because its amplitude depended on the applied voltage from the charged capacitor. Charge induced closing of a trap plant can be repeated 2–3 times on the same Venus flytrap plant after reopening. Transmission of a single electrical charge (mean 13.63 µC, median 14.00 µC, std. dev. 1.51 µC, n = 41) causes the trap to close and induces an electrical signal that propagates between the lobe and the midrib. Figure 1 illustrates that the Venus flytrap can accumulate small charges, and when the threshold value is reached, the trap closes. A summation of stimuli is demonstrated through the repetitive application of smaller charges. If we apply two or more consecutive injections of electrical charge within a period of less than 50 s, the trap will close when a total of 14 µC charge is reached.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Mechanism of the Dionaea trap closure.Repeated application of smaller charges demonstrates a summation of stimuli. If we apply two or more injections of electrical charges within a period of less then 20 s, the Venus flytrap upper leaf closes as soon as the total of 14 µC charge is transmitted. Similar phenomenon was reported by Czaja,²⁹ who determined the intensity of threshold stimuli to be 2.4 µC for a closing electrostimulation of another carnivorous plant Aldrovanda vesiculosa, and 0.91 µC for an opening electrostimulation. Our attempts to open the Venus flytrap upper leaf by changing polarity of injected charge and increasing the charge from 14 µC to 100 µC were not successful. Usually, the trap opens a few days after closing in the same way as after mechanically stimulated closing.Previous work by Brown and Sharp²⁴ indicated that electrical shock between lower and upper leaves can cause the Venus flytrap to close, but in their article, the amplitude and polarity of applied voltage, charge and electrical current were not reported. The trap did not close when we applied the same electrostimulation between the upper and lower leaves as we applied between a midrib and a lobe, even when the injected charge was increased from 14 µC to 750 µC. It is probable that the electroshock induced by Brown and Sharp²⁴ had a very high voltage or electrical current.It is common knowledge that the leaves of the Venus flytrap actively employ turgor pressure and hydrodynamic flow for fast movement and catching insects. In these processes the upper and lower surfaces of the leaf behave quite differently. During the trap closing, the loss of turgor by parenchyma lying beneath the upper epidermis, accompanied by the active expansion of the tissues of the lower layers of parenchyma near the under epidermis, closes the trap. The cells on the inner face of the trap jettison their cargo of water, shrink and allow the trap lobe to fold over. The cells of the lower epidermis expand rapidly, folding the trap lobe over. These anatomical features constitute the basis of the new hydroelastic curvature model.²⁰In terms of electrophysiology, Venus flytrap responses can be considered in three stages: (i) stimulus perception, (ii) signal transmission and (iii) induction of response (Fig. 1).     

The plant cell pressure probe

The pressure probe is a micro manometer for the simultaneous direct recording and manipulation of plant cell hydrostatic pressure. It is used to map in space and time the turgor pressures of individual cells within tissues and organs of intact plants. This is used to study the hydraulic architecture of tissues, tissue movement and the responses of tissues to water stress. The approach can be augmented by simultaneous measurement of individual cell osmotic pressure. This permits the hydraulic driving forces across selectively permeable membranes and walls to be assessed fully. By manipulating manually the pressure, cell wall elasticity and its properties can also be mapped. Under some conditions this can be extended to plastic behaviour.     

Zuckerbrot und Peitsche

Marantaceae (arrowrood) are among the few examples of plants showing unexpectedly fast movements such as the ones in the meaningful mimosa or carnivorous plants. In the Venus flytrap (Dionaea), the movement of leaves is an extreme fast reaction to mechanical stimuli and based on the propagation of electrical signals. Of course, it was interesting to investigate, whether the explosively moving style of Marantaceae is based on a comparable mechanism. Electrophysiological experiments helped to understand how one of the fastest movements in the plant kingdom is mediated.     

Water transport in maize roots : measurement of hydraulic conductivity, solute permeability, and of reflection coefficients of excised roots using the root pressure probe

A root pressure probe has been used to measure the root pressure (P_r) exerted by excised main roots of young maize plants (Zea Mays L.). Defined gradients of hydrostatic and osmotic pressure could be set up between root xylem and medium to induce radial water flows across the root cylinder in both directions. The hydraulic conductivity of the root (Lp_r) was evaluated from root pressure relaxations. When permeating solutes were added to the medium, biphasic root pressure relaxations were observed with water and solute phases and root pressure minima (maxima) which allowed the estimation of permeability (P_Sr) and reflection coefficients (σ_sr) of roots. Reflection coefficients were: ethanol, 0.27; mannitol, 0.74; sucrose, 0.54; PEG 1000, 0.82; NaCl, 0.64; KNO₃, 0.67, and permeability coefficients (in 10⁻⁸ meters per second): ethanol, 4.7; sucrose, 1.6; and NaCl, 5.7. Lp_r was very different for osmotic and hydrostatic gradients. For hydrostatic gradients Lp_r was 1·10⁻⁷ meters per second per megapascal, whereas in osmotic experiments the hydraulic conductivity was found to be an order of magnitude lower. For hydrostatic gradients, the exosmotic Lp_r was about 15% larger than the endosmotic, whereas in osmotic experiments the polarity in the water movement was reversed. These results either suggest effects of unstirred layers at the osmotic barrier in the root, an asymmetrical barrier, and/or mechanical effects. Measurements of the hydraulic conductivity of individual root cortex cells revealed an Lp similar to Lp_r (hydrostatic). It is concluded that, in the presence of external hydrostatic gradients, water moves primarily in the apoplast, whereas in the presence of osmotic gradients this component is much smaller in relation to the cell-to-cell component (symplasmic plus transcellular transport).     

Flying-patch patch-clamp study of G22E-MscL mutant under high hydrostatic pressure

High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) present in natural environments impacts on cell membrane biophysical properties and protein quaternary structure. We have investigated the effect of high hydrostatic pressure on G22E-MscL, a spontaneously opening mutant of Escherichia coli MscL, the bacterial mechanosensitive channel of large conductance. Patch-clamp technique combined with a flying-patch device and hydraulic setup allowed the study of the effects of HHP up to 90 MPa (as near the bottom of the Marianas Trench) on the MscL mutant channel reconstituted into liposome membranes, in addition to recording in situ from the mutant channels expressed in E. coli giant spheroplasts. In general, against thermodynamic predictions, hydrostatic pressure in the range of 0.1–90 MPa increased channel open probability by favoring the open state of the channel. Furthermore, hydrostatic pressure affected the channel kinetics, as manifested by the propensity of the channel to gate at subconducting levels with an increase in pressure. We propose that the presence of water molecules around the hydrophobic gate of the G22E MscL channel induce hydration of the hydrophobic lock under HHP causing frequent channel openings and preventing the channel closure in the absence of membrane tension. Furthermore, our study indicates that HHP can be used as a valuable experimental approach toward better understanding of the gating mechanism in complex channels such as MscL.     

Day-Night Variations in Malate Concentration, Osmotic Pressure, and Hydrostatic Pressure in Cereus validus

Malate concentration and stem osmotic pressure concomitantly increase during nighttime CO₂ fixation and then decrease during the daytime in the obligate Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) plant, Cereus validus (Cactaceae). Changes in malate osmotic pressure calculated using the Van't Hoff relation match the changes in stem osmotic pressure, indicating that changes in malate level affected the water relations of the succulent stems. In contrast to stem osmotic pressure, stem water potential showed little day-night changes, suggesting that changes in cellular hydrostatic pressure occurred. This was corroborated by direct measurements of hydrostatic pressure using the Jülich pressure probe where a small oil-filled micropipette is inserted directly into chlorenchyma cells, which indicated a 4-fold increase in hydrostatic pressure from dusk to dawn. A transient increase of hydrostatic pressure at the beginning of the dark period was correlated with a short period of stomatal closing between afternoon and nighttime CO₂ fixation, suggesting that the rather complex hydrostatic pressure patterns could be explained by an interplay between the effects of transpiration and malate levels. A second CAM plant, Agave deserti, showed similar day-night changes in hydrostatic pressure in its succulent leaves. It is concluded that, in addition to the inverted stomatal rhythm, the oscillations of malate markedly affect osmotic pressures and hence water relations of CAM plants.     

A mathematical model on the closing and opening mechanism for Venus flytrap

This paper investigates the opening and closing mechanism for the Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula). A mathematical model has been proposed to explain how the flytrap transitions between open, semi-closed and closed states. The model accounts for the charge accumulation of action potentials, which generated by mechanical stimulation of the sensitive trigger hairs on the lobes of the flytrap. Though many studies have been reported for the Venus flytrap opening and closing mechanism, this paper attempts to explain the mechanism from nonlinear dynamics and control perspective.Key words: Venus flytrap, modelling, kinetics     

Axial and Radial Hydraulic Resistance to Roots of Maize (Zea mays L.)

A root pressure probe was employed to measure hydraulic properties of primary roots of maize (Zea mays L.). The hydraulic conductivity (Lp_r) of intact root segments was determined by applying gradients of hydrostatic and osmotic pressure across the root cylinder. In hydrostatic experiments, Lp_r was constant along the segment except for an apical zone of approximately 20 millimeters in length which was hydraulically isolated due to a high axial resistance. In osmotic experiments, Lp_r decreased toward the base of the roots. Lp_r (osmotic) was significantly smaller than Lp_r (hydrostatic). At various distances from the root tip, the axial hydraulic resistance per unit root length (R_x) was measured either by perfusing excised root segments or was estimated according to Poiseuille's law from cross-sections. The calculated R_x was smaller than the measured R_x by a factor of 2 to 5. Axial resistance varied with the distance from the apex due to the differentiation of early metaxylem vessels. Except for the apical 20 millimeters, radial water movement was limiting water uptake into the root. This is important for the evaluation of Lp_r of roots from root pressure relaxations. Stationary water uptake into the roots was modeled using measured values of axial and radial hydraulic resistances in order to work out profiles of axial water flow and xylem water potentials.     

Trap diversity and evolution in the family Droseraceae

We review trapping mechanisms in the carnivorous flowering plant family Droseraceae (order Caryophyllales). Its members are generally known to attract, capture, retain and digest prey animals (mainly arthropods) with active snap-traps (Aldrovanda, Dionaea) or with active sticky flypaper traps (Drosera) and to absorb the resulting nutrients. Recent investigations revealed how the snap-traps of Aldrovanda vesiculosa (waterwheel plant) and Dionaea muscipula (Venus’ flytrap) work mechanically and how these apparently similar devices differ as to their functional morphology and shutting mechanics. The Sundews (Drosera spp.) are generally known to possess leaves covered with glue-tentacles that both can bend toward and around stuck prey. Recently, it was shown that there exists in this genus a higher diversity of different tentacle types and trap configurations than previously known which presumably reflect adaptations to different prey spectra. Based on these recent findings, we finally comment on possible ways for intrafamiliar trap evolution.     

Water Stress and Protein Synthesis: II. Interaction between Water Stress, Hydrostatic Pressure, and Abscisic Acid on the Pattern of Protein Synthesis in Avena Coleoptiles

Water stress causes a reduction in hydrostatic pressure and can cause an increase in abscisic acid in plant tissues. To assess the possible role of abscisic acid and hydrostatic pressure in water stress effects, we have compared the effects of water stress, abscisic acid, and an imposed hydrostatic pressure on the rate and pattern of protein synthesis in Avena coleoptiles. Water stress reduces the rate and changes the pattern of protein synthesis as judged by a double labeling ratio technique, Abscisic acid reduces the rate but does not alter the pattern of protein synthesis. Gibberellic acid reverses the abscisic acid-induced but not the stress-induced inhibition of protein synthesis. The effect of hydrostatic pressure depends on the gas used. With a 19: 1 N₂-air mixture, the rate of protein synthesis is increased in stressed but not in turgid tissues. An imposed hydrostatic pressure alters the pattern of synthesis in stressed tissues, but does not restore the pattern to that found in turgid tissues. Because of the differences in response, we conclude that water stress does not affect protein synthesis via abscisic acid or reduced hydrostatic pressure.     

Determination of the hydraulic conductivity and of reflection coefficients in Nitella flexilis by means of direct cell-turgor pressure measurements

From direct and continuous measurements of the internal hydrostatic pressure (P) in the internodes of Nitella flexilis, the reflection coefficients (σ_s) of some non-electrolytes were determined, using a zero-flow method, and were compared with those found previously on Valonia utricularis and with those obtained by Dainty and Ginzburg on other Characean internodes from transcellular osmosis experiments. The hydraulic conductivities (Lp) of the cell membranes were determined by two independent methods, that is, using hydrostatically or osmotically induced flows. From the exponential time course of P in such experiments and from the volumetric elastic modulus (ε) of the cell wall, Lp was calculated. The effect of unstirred layers in the methods described was negligibly small.In osmotic experiments with different non-plasmolysing external sucrose concentrations (20–200 mM) the exosmotic hydraulic conductivity (Lp_ex) decreases markedly with increasing concentration, while the endosmotic hydraulic conductivity (Lp_en) shows only a weak dependence. In the hydrostatic experiments the hydraulic conductivities for single cells were constant in the pressure range for P from 2 to 7 atm. In this pressure range Lp_en and Lp_ex varied for different cells from 2.2·10^?5 to 2.8·10^?5 and from 1.8·10^?5 to 2.5·10^?5 cm·s^?1·atm^?1, respectively, with an average ratio Lp_en to Lp_ex of 1.1, which indicates a polarity in water movement.These values were the same as those obtained in the osmotic experiments from extrapolation to zero sucrose concentration. At internal pressures below 2 atm the Lp-values markedly increase on approaching the plasmolytic point.The results are discussed in terms of a dehydration of the membranes (or the cytoplasm) at increased solute concentrations. In addition, the strong dependence of Lp at low internal hydrostatic pressures points to a direct influence of P on the water permeability of the membranes.