Nitric oxide (NO)-dependent and NO-independent signaling pathways act in ABA-inhibition of stomatal opening

We investigated the role of nitric oxide (NO) in ABA-inhibition of stomatal opening in Vicia faba L. in different size dishes. When a large dish (9 cm diameter) was used, ABA induced NO synthesis and the NO scavenger reduced ABA-inhibition of stomatal opening. When a small dish (6 cm diameter) was used, ABA induced stomatal closure and inhibited stomatal opening. The NO scavenger was able to reduce ABA-induced stomatal closure, but unable to reverse ABA-inhibition of stomatal opening. Furthermore, NO was not synthesized in response to ABA, indicating that NO is not required for ABA-inhibition of stomatal opening in the small dish. These results indicated that an NO-dependent and an NO-independent signaling pathway participate in ABA signaling pathway. An NO-dependent pathway is the major player in ABA-induced stomatal closure. However, in ABA-inhibition of stomatal opening, an NO-dependent and an NO-independent pathway act: different signaling molecules participate in ABA-signaling cascade under different environmental condition.Key words: ABA, environmental condition, nitric oxide, stomata, Vicia faba LNitric oxide (NO) is a key signaling molecule in plants.^1,2 It functions in disease resistance and programmed cell death,^3,4 root development,^5,6 and plant responses to various abiotic stresses.^1,2,7,8 In addition, NO is required for stomatal closure in response to ABA in several species including Arabidopsis, Vicia faba, pea, tomato, barley, and wheat.^9–11 ABA-inhibition of stomatal opening is a distinct process from ABA-induced stomatal closure.^12,13 In V. faba, these two processes employ a similar signaling pathway; NO is also a second messenger molecule for ABA-inhibition of stomatal opening in a large dish.¹⁴ In this study, we examined the role of NO in ABA-inhibition of stomatal opening using different dish sizes. In a small dish, NO is not involved in ABA-inhibition of stomatal opening: the NO-independent signaling pathway is the major player in it.     

Methyl jasmonate signaling and signal crosstalk between methyl jasmonate and abscisic acid in guard cells

Plants tightly control stomatal aperture in response to various environmental changes. A drought-inducible phytohormone, abscisic acid (ABA), triggers stomatal closure and ABA signaling pathway in guard cells has been well studied. Similar to ABA, methyl jasmonate (MeJA) induces stomatal closure in various plant species but MeJA signaling pathway is still far from clear. Recently we found that Arabidopsis calcium dependent protein kinase CPK6 functions as a positive regulator in guard cell MeJA signaling and provided new insights into cytosolic Ca²⁺-dependent MeJA signaling. Here we discuss the MeJA signaling and also signal crosstalk between MeJA and ABA pathways in guard cells.Key words: methyl jasmonate, abscisic acid, guard cell, reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, calciumStomata, which are formed by pairs of specialized cells called guard cells, control gas exchanges and transpirational water loss. Guard cells can shrink and swell in response to various physiological stimuli, resulting in stomatal closing and opening.^1,2 To optimize growth under various environmental conditions, plants have developed fine-tuned signal pathway in guard cells. Abscisic acid (ABA) is synthesized under drought stress and induces stomatal closure to reduce transpirational water loss.² ABA signal transduction in guard cells has been widely studied. ABA induces increases of various second messengers such as cytosolic Ca²⁺, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) in guard cells. These early signal components finally evoke ion efflux through plasma membrane ion channels, resulting in reduction of guard cell turgor pressure.Jasmonates are plant hormones synthesized via the octadecanoid pathway and regulate various physiological processes in plants such as pollen maturation, tendril coiling, senescence and responses to wounding and pathogen attacks.³ Similar to ABA, jasmonates also trigger stomatal closure and the response is conserved among various plant species including Arabidopsis thaliana,⁴ Hordeum vulgare,⁵ Commelina benghalensis,⁶ Vicia faba,⁷ Nicotiana glauca,⁸ Paphiopedilum Supersuk⁹ and Paphiopedilum tonsum.⁹ A volatile methyl ester of jasmonic acid (JA), methy jasmonate (MeJA), has been widely used for studying jasmonate signaling pathway. To date, pharmacological and reverse genetic approaches have revealed many important signal components involved in MeJA-induced stomatal closure and suggest a signal crosstalk between MeJA and ABA in guard cells. In this review, we mainly focus on the three important second messengers, ROS, NO and cytosolic Ca²⁺ and discuss recent advance about MeJA signaling and signal interaction between MeJA and ABA in guard cells.     

MEK1/2 and p38-like MAP kinase successively mediate H2O2 signaling in Vicia guard cell

As a second messenger, H₂O₂ generation and signal transduction is subtly controlled and involves various signal elements, among which are the members of MAP kinase family. The increasing evidences indicate that both MEK1/2 and p38-like MAP protein kinase mediate ABA-induced H₂O₂ signaling in plant cells. Here we analyze the mechanisms of similarity and difference between MEK1/2 and p38-like MAP protein kinase in mediating ABA-induced H₂O₂ generation, inhibition of inward K⁺ currents, and stomatal closure. These data suggest that activation of MEK1/2 is prior to p38-like protein kinase in Vicia guard cells.Key words: H₂O₂ signaling, ABA, p38-like MAP kinase, MEK1/2, guard cellAn increasing number of literatures elucidate that reactive oxygen species (ROS), especially H₂O₂, is essential to plant growth and development in response to stresses,^1–4 and involves activation of various signaling events, among which are the MAP kinase cascades.^1–3,5 Typically, activation of MEK1/2 mediates NADPH oxidase-dependent ROS generation in response to stresses,^4,6–8 and the facts that MEK1/2 inhibits the expression and activation of antioxidant enzymes reveal how PD98059, the specific inhibitor of MEK1/2, abolishes abscisic acid (ABA)-induced H₂O₂ generation.^6,8,9 It has been indicated that PD98059 does not to intervene on salicylic acid (SA)-stimulated H₂O₂ signaling regardless of SA mimicking ABA in regulating stomatal closure.^2,6,8,10 Generally, activation of MEK1/2 promotes ABA-induced stomatal closure by elevating H₂O₂ generation in conjunction with inactivating anti-oxidases.Moreover, activation of plant p38-like protein kinase, the putative counterpart of yeast or mammalian p38 MAP kinase, has been reported to participate in various stress responses and ROS signaling. It has been well documented that p38 MAP kinase is involved in stress-triggered ROS signaling in yeast or mammalian cells.^11–13 Similar to those of yeast and mammals, many studies showed the activation of p38-like protein kinase in response to stresses in various plants, including Arabidopsis thaliana,^14–16 Pisum sativum,¹⁷ Medicago sativa¹⁸ and tobacco.¹⁹ The specific p38 kinase inhibitor SB203580 was found to modulate physiological processes in plant tissues or cells, such as wheat root cells,²⁰ tobacco tissue²¹ and suspension-cultured Oryza sativa cells.²² Recently, we investigate how activation of p38-like MAP kinase is involved in ABA-induced H₂O₂ signaling in guard cells. Our results show that SB203580 blocks ABA-induced stomatal closure by inhibiting ABA-induced H₂O₂ generation and decreasing K⁺ influx across the plasma membrane of Vicia guard cells, contrasting greatly with its analog SB202474, which has no effect on these events.^23,24 This suggests that ABA integrate activation of p38-like MAP kinase and H₂O₂ signaling to regulate stomatal behavior. In conjunction with SB203580 mimicking PD98059 not to mediate SA-induced H₂O₂ signaling,^23,24 these results generally reveal that the activation of p38-like MAP kinase and MEK1/2 is similar in guard cells.On the other hand, activation of p38-like MAP kinase^23,24 is not always identical to that of MEK1/2^8,25 in ABA-induced H₂O₂ signaling of Vicia guard cells. For example, H₂O₂^- and ABA-induced stomatal closure was partially reversed by SB203580. The maximum inhibition of both regent-induced stomatal closure were observed at 2 h after treatment with SB203580, under which conditions the stomatal apertures were 89% and 70% of the control values, respectively. By contrast, when PD98059 was applied together with ABA or H₂O₂, the effects of both ABA- and H₂O₂-induced stomatal closure were completely abolished (Fig. 1). These data imply that the two members of MAP kinase family are efficient in H₂O₂-stimulated stomatal closure, but p38-like MAP kinase is less susceptive than MEK1/2 to ABA stimuli.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Effects of SB203580 and PD98059 on ABA- and H₂O₂-induced stomatal closure. The experimental procedure and data analysis are according to the previous publication.^8,23,24It has been reported that ABA or NaCl activate p38 MAP kinase in the chloronema cells of the moss Funaria hygrometrica in 2∼10 min.²⁶ Similar to this, SB203580 improves H₂O₂-inhibited inward K⁺ currents after 4 min and leads it to the control level (100%) during the following 8 min (Fig. 2). However, the activation of p38-like MAP kinase in response to ABA need more time, and only recovered to 75% of the control at 8 min of treatment (Fig. 2). These results suggest that control of H₂O₂ signaling is required for the various protein kinases including p38-like MAP kinase and MEK1/2 in guard cells,^1,2,8,23,24 and the ABA and H₂O₂ pathways diverge further downstream in their actions on the K⁺ channels and, thus, on stomatal control. Other differences in action between ABA and H₂O₂ are known. For example, Köhler et al. (2001) reported that H₂O₂ inhibited the K⁺ outward rectifier in guard cells shows that H₂O₂ does not mimic ABA action on guard cell ion channels as it acts on the K⁺ outward rectifier in a manner entirely contrary to that of ABA.²⁷Open in a separate windowFigure 2Effect of SB203580 on ABA- and H₂O₂-inhibited inward K⁺ currents. The experimental procedure and data analysis are according to the previous publication.²⁴ SB203580 directs ABA- and H₂O₂-inactivated inward K⁺ currents across plasma membrane of Vicia guard cells. Here the inward K⁺ currents value is stimulated by −190 mV voltage.Based on the similarity and difference between PD98059 and SB203580 in interceding ABA and H₂O₂ signaling, we speculate the possible mechanism is that the member of MAP kinase family specially regulate signal event in ABA-triggered ROS signaling network,^1–4 and the signaling model as follows (Fig. 3).Open in a separate windowFigure 3Schematic illustration of MAP kinase-mediated H₂O₂ signaling of guard cells. The arrows indicate activation. The line indicates enhancement and the bar denotes inhibition.     

A new callose function: Involvement in differentiation and function of fern stomatal complexes

Callose in polypodiaceous ferns performs multiple roles during stomatal development and function. This highly dynamic (1→3)-β-D-glucan, in cooperation with the cytoskeleton, is involved in: (a) stomatal pore formation, (b) deposition of local GC wall thickenings and (c) the mechanism of stomatal pore opening and closure. This behavior of callose, among others, probably relies on the particular mechanical properties as well as on the ability to form and degrade rapidly, to create a scaffold or to serve as a matrix for deposition of other cell wall materials and to produce fibrillar deposits in the periclinal GC walls, radially arranged around the stomatal pore. The local callose deposition in closing stomata is an immediate response of the external periclinal GC walls experiencing strong mechanical forces induced by the neighboring cells. The radial callose fibrils transiently co-exist with radial cellulose microfibrils and, like the latter, seem to be oriented via cortical MTs.Key words: callose, cytoskeleton, fern stomata, guard cell wall thickening, stomatal function, stomatal pore formationCallose represents a hemicellulosic matrix cell wall component, usually of temporal appearance, which is synthesized by callose synthases, enzymes localized in the plasmalemma and degraded by (1→3)-β-glucanases.^1–4 It consists of triple helices of a linear homopolymer of (1→3)-β-glucose residues.^5–7 The plant cell is able to form and degrade callose in a short time. On the surface of the plasmolyzed protoplast a thin callose surface film may arise within seconds.⁸ Callose is the only cell wall component that is implicated in a great variety of developmental plant processes, like cell plate formation,^9–11 microspore development,^12–14 trafficking through plasmodesmata,^15,16 formation and closure of sieve pores,¹⁶ response of the plant cells to multiple biotic and abiotic stresses,^4,5 establishment of distinct “cell cortex domains”,¹⁷ etc.Despite the widespread occurrence of callose, its general function(s) is (are) not well understood (reviewed in refs. ⁴ and ⁵). It may serve as: a matrix for deposition of other cell wall materials, as in developing cell plates;⁹ a cell wall-strengthening material, as in cotton seed hairs and growing pollen tubes;¹⁸ a sealing or plugging material at the plasma membrane of pit fields, plasmodesmata and sieve plate pores;¹⁶ a mechanical obstruction to growth of fungal hyphae or a special permeability barrier, as in pollen mother cell walls and muskmelon endosperm envelopes.^4,19,20 The degree of polymerization, age and thickness of callose deposits may cause variation in its physical properties.⁵Evidence accumulated so far showed that a significant number of ferns belonging to Polypodiales and some other fern classes forms intense callose deposits in the developing GC wall thickenings.^21–28 This phenomenon has not been observed in angiosperm stomata, although callose is deposited along the whole surface of the young VW and in the VW ends of differentiating and mature stomata (our unpublished data; reviewed in refs ²⁹ and ³⁰).Stomata are specialized epidermal bicellular structures (Fig. 1A) regulating gas exchange between the aerial plant organs and the external environment. Their appearance in the first land plants was crucial for their adaptation and survival in the terrestrial environment. The constituent GCs have the ability to undergo reversible changes in shape, leading to opening and closure of the stomatal pore (stomatal movement). The mechanism by which GCs change shape is based on: (a) the particular mechanical properties of GC walls owed to their particular shape, thickening, fine structure and chemical composition and (b) the reversible changes in vacuole volume, in response to environmental factors, through fairly complicated biochemical pathways.^30–33Open in a separate windowFigure 1(A) Diagrammatic representation of an elliptical stoma. (B–E) Diagram to show the process of stomatal pore formation in angiosperms (B and C) and Polypodiales ferns (D and E). The arrows in (B) indicate the forming stomatal pore. DW, dorsal wall; EPW, external periclinal wall; GC, guard cell; IPW, internal periclinal wall; ISP, internal stomatal pore; PE polar ventral wall end; VW, ventral wall.The present review is focused on the multiple-role of callose in differentiating and functioning fern stomata, as they are substantiated by the available information, including some unpublished data, and in particular in: stomatal pore formation, deposition of GC wall thickenings and opening and closure of the stomatal pore. The mode of deposition of fibrillar callose deposits in GC walls and the mechanism of their alignment are also considered.     

Hydrogen sulfide effects on stomatal apertures

Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) has recently been reported to be a signaling molecule in plants. It has been well established that is has such roles in animals and it has been suggested that it is included into the group of gasotransmitters. We have recently shown that hydrogen sulfide causes stomatal opening in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. H₂S can be supplied to the plant tissues from donors such as sodium hydrosulfide (NaSH) or more recently from slow release H₂S donor molecules such as GYY4137. Both give similar effects, that is, they cause stomatal opening. Furthermore both H₂S donors reduced the accumulation of nitric oxide (NO) induced by abscisic acid (ABA) treatment of leaf tissues. Here similar work has been repeated in a crop plant, Capsicum anuum, and similar data has been obtained, suggesting that such effects of hydrogen sulfide on plants is not confined to model species.Key words: abscisic acid, GYY4137, hydrogen sulfide, nitric oxide, stomatal apertureThe effects of hydrogen sulfide on plants have been studied for many years, but it is only recently that it has been suggested that this gas is acting as a signaling molecule. In animals this has been well established^1,2 and it has been suggested that H₂S be grouped together with other gasotransmitters.^2,3 This group will also contain nitric oxide (NO) which as well as having established roles in animals is also known to cause stomatal closure in plants.^4,5 With this in mind, we previously investigated whether H₂S may also have an effect on stomatal closure, using a model organism Arabidopsis thaliana.⁶ The study used two different H₂S donors, sodium hydrosulfide (NaSH) and morpholin-4-ium 4 methoxyphenyl(morpholino) phosphinodithionate (GYY4137). The former will release H₂S in an instant burst which soon dissipates, which questions the wisdom of its use. GYY4137 on the other hand will release H₂S much more slowly and in a manner which is more likely to reflect physiological generation of H₂S.^7,8 Both donors caused stomatal that had previously been exposed to light to open even further. If leaf tissues were not light treated H₂S compounds once again caused stomata to open. Furthermore, H₂S treatment prevented stomatal closure caused by dark treatment. To investigate the possible mechanism of this effect, tissues were treated with the plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA) to initiate NO generation and then NO accumulation was measured in the absence and presence of H₂S donors using fluorescent probes and confocal microscopy.⁹ Both NaSH and GYY4137 caused a reduction in the accumulation of NO. This suggests that H₂S may be acting by a disruption of NO signaling, which results in the alteration of guard cell physiology.Others have reported different effects of H₂S on stomatal movements. Garcia-Mata and Lamattina¹⁰ found that both H₂S donors NaSH and GY4137 caused stomatal closure in different plant species including Vicia faba, Arabidopsis thaliana and Impatiens walleriana. Use of glibenclamide, which is an ABC transport inhibitor, reduced the effect. Cystathione γ lyase and L-Cys desulfhydrase are enzymes which may be responsible for H₂S synthesis and stomatal movements were also reduced by propargylglycine, an inhibitor of these enzymes. It was suggested therefore that H₂S helps to mediate ABA signaling pathway in guard cells. This paper was further discussed following its publication by Desikan.¹¹ However, this seems to be in conflict with the work we reported. This would not be the first time that there has been contradictory data when it comes to reporting stomatal movements, as ethylene has been shown to mediate auxin-induced opening¹² and to cause stomatal closure.¹³More recently it has been reported that stomatal conductance was increased by carbonyl sulfide (COS).¹⁴ The authors went on to suggest that this effect was mediated by H₂S which was produced from COS hydrolysis. This seems to support our original data. Therefore, here we report on the effects of both NaSH and GYY4137 on a different plant species and one which has relevance as an important crop, that is Capsicum anuum. GYY4137 was supplied as in our previous paper in reference ⁶ and ⁷. As can be seen in Figure 1A NaSH caused stomata to open further, even though the leaf tissue had been exposed to the light. Stomata were able to close, as ABA treatment demonstrated, therefore showing that the stomata were not defective. When the experiments were repeated with GYY4137 (Fig. 1B) and smaller but similar effect of the addition of the H₂S donor was seen. This would be expected as the release of H₂S from GYY4137 would be slower and more prolonged than from NaSH.^7,8 To investigate if NO accumulation is also effected in Capsicum when treated with H₂S donors, leaf tissue was treated with ABA to initiate NO generation and NO measured by the use of DAF2-DA as previously reported in references ⁶ and ⁹. Once again the presence of H₂S donors dramatically reduced the amount of NO that was measured following ABA treatment (Fig. 2). This once again suggests that H₂S is having an effect on NO metabolism which may account for the stomata aperture measurements. It has been suggested in animal systems that H₂S and NO react, resulting in the formation of nitrosothiols/nitrothiol-like species¹⁵ which could have signaling effects in their own right. NO in plants has been reported to lead to increased cGMP and/or increased nitrosylation of proteins,⁵ but if H₂S was removing the bioavailability of NO both mechanisms are likely to be reduced.Open in a separate windowFigure 1H₂S donors cause stomatal opening in Capsicum anuum. The leaves of analyzed from Capsicum anuum plants which were between 6 and 7 weeks old. Stomatal bioassays were performed as described previously by Desikan et al.⁹ Epidermal peels were incubated in MES-KCl buffer [10 mM 2-morpholino ethane sulfonic acid (MES), 5 mM KCl, 50 µM CaCl₂, pH 6.15] for 2.5 h exposed to the direct lightning (in 60–100 IE m⁻² s⁻¹) before the addition of various compounds. (A) Samples were sheltered from direct lighting and treated with ABA or NaHS for 2.5 h and left under the day light conditions before stomata apertures were analyzed. (B) Samples were sheltered from direct lighting and treated with ABA or GYY 4137 for next 2 h and left under the day light conditions before stomata apertures were analyzed. Apertures were measured using a light microscope and imaging camera with LEICA QWIN image processing and analysis software (Leica Microsystems and Imaging Solutions, Cambridge, UK). n = 40 stomatal apertures, ±SE. GYY4137 was synthesis as previously described in reference ⁷.Open in a separate windowFigure 2H₂S donors reduce NO accumulation in Capsicum anuum. Nitric oxide accumulation was estimated using the specific NO dye DAF2-DA (Calbiochem, Nottingham, UK), using the method described previously by Desikan et al.⁹ Epidermal fragments in MES-KCl buffer (10 mM MES, 5 mM KCl, 50 µM CaCl₂, pH 6.15) were exposed to the direct lightning for 2 h. After 2 h samples were loaded with 30 µM DAF2-DA for 15 min before washing with MES-KCl buffer; three times for 10 min. Fragments were subsequently incubated for a further 30 min in the presence of various compounds (as indicated below) before images were visualized using CLSM (excitation 488 nm, emission 515 nm; Nikon PCM2000, Kingston-upon-Thames, UK). Images acquired were analyzed using SCION IMAGE software (Scion, Frederick, MD, USA). (A) Control with no treatment; (B) ABA (50) treatment; (C) NaHS (100 µm) treatment alone; (D) ABA treatment in the presence of NaHS; (E) GYY4137 (100 µm) treatment alone; (F) ABA treatment in the presence of NaHS.NO metabolism is involved in a wide range of plant functions, including seed germination,¹⁶ floral development,¹⁷ root gravitropism¹⁸ and gene expression¹⁹ as well as controlling stomatal function.⁴ H₂S on the other hand may be present in or around plants for a variety to reasons. H₂S can be produced endogenously by for example by plastid located cysteine desulfhydrases,²⁰ or H₂S may come from the environment,²¹ including the soil and waters.²² This is further discussed in a recent review in reference ²³. Therefore future work should be focused on the interplay between H₂S from a variety of sources on the NO metabolism of a range of plant tissues. Not all affects of H₂S will be mediated by NO, with alterations of glutathione on H₂S treatment being reported for example.²⁴ But the full extent of the modulation of NO accumulation and signal by both exogenous and endogenous H₂S needs to be explored so the role of these gasotransmitters^2,3 in mediating hormone and stress responses in plants can be fully understood.     

Nitric oxide functions in both methyl jasmonate signaling and abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells

Intracellular components in methyl jasmonate (MeJA) signaling remain largely unknown, to compare those in well-understood abscisic acid (ABA) signaling. We have reported that nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling component in MeJA-induced stomatal closure, as well as ABA-induced stomatal closure in the previous study. To gain further information about the role of NO in the guard cell signaling, NO production was examined in an ABA- and MeJA-insensitive Arabidopsis mutant, rcn1. Neither MeJA nor ABA induced NO production in rcn1 guard cells. Our data suggest that NO functions downstream of the branch point of MeJA and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.Key words: abscisic acid, Arabidopsis thaliana, guard cells, methyl jasmonate, nitric oxideStomatal pores that are formed by pairs of guard cells respond to various environmental stimuli including plant hormones. Some signal components commonly function in MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closing signals,¹ such as cytosolic alkalization, ROS generation and cytosolic free calcium ion elevation. Recently, we demonstrated that NO functions in MeJA signaling, as well as ABA signaling in guard cells.²NO production by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and nitrate reductase (NR) plays important roles in physiological processes in plants.^3,4 It has been shown that NO functions downstream of ROS production in ABA signaling in guard cells.⁵ NO mediates elevation of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca²⁺]_cyt), inactivation of inward-rectifying K⁺ channels and activation of S-type anion channels,⁶ which are known to be key factors in MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closure.^2,7–9It has been reported that ROS was not induced by MeJA and ABA in the MeJA- and ABA-insensitive mutant, rcn1 in which the regulatory subunit A of protein phosphatase 2A, RCN1, is impaired.^7,10 We examined NO production induced by MeJA and ABA in rcn1 guard cells (Fig. 1). NO production by MeJA and ABA was impaired in rcn1 mutant (p = 0.87 and 0.25 for MeJA and ABA, respectively) in contrast to wild type. On the other hand, the NO donor, SNP induced stomatal closure both in wild type and rcn1 mutant (data not shown). These results are consistent with our previous results, i.e., NO is involved in both MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closure and functions downstream of the branching point of MeJA and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.⁷ Our finding implies that protein phosphatase 2A might positively regulate NO levels in guard cells (Fig. 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Impairment of MeJA- and ABA-induced NO production in rcn1 guard cells. (A) Effects of MeJA (n = 10) and ABA (n = 9) on NO production in wild-type guard cells. (B) Effects of MeJA (n = 7) and ABA (n = 7) on NO production in rcn1 guard cells. The vertical scale represents the percentage of diaminofluorescein-2 diacetate (DAF-2 DA) fluorescent levels when fluorescent intensities of MeJA- or ABA-treated cells are normalized to control value taken as 100% for each experiment. Each datum was obtained from at least 30 guard cells. Error bars represent standard errors. Significance of differences between data sets was assessed by Student''s t-test analysis in this paper. We regarded differences at the level of p < 0.05 as significant.Open in a separate windowFigure 2A model of signal interaction in MeJA-induced and ABA-induced stomatal closure. Neither MeJA nor ABA induces ROS production, NO production, I_Kin and stomatal closure in rcn1 mutant. These results suggest that NO functions downstream of the branch point of MeJA signaling and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.     

Rapid stomatal closure triggered by a short ozone pulse is followed by reopening to overshooting values

Stomatal pores, surrounded by the pairs of guard cells, regulate plant gas exchange. Correct stomatal regulation is crucial for plant survival under various stress conditions. We have recently utilized the air pollutant ozone (O₃) to study stomatal signaling and showed that application of O₃ induces rapid decrease in stomatal conductance. Here we have addressed the recovery of stomatal conductance and show that after exposures of plants to high O₃ pulses stomatal conductance recovered faster, reaching higher, “overshooting” values than were the pre-exposure values. We propose the hypothetical mechanism for this phenomenon and discuss it in the frames of current stomatal signaling models.Key words: ozone, stomata, signaling, Arabidopsis, overshooting, guard cells, stressRapid progress in understanding structural and molecular mechanisms of the core abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway and subsequent stomatal closure (reviewed in ref. ¹) has been achieved by using a variety of mostly in vitro technologies and approaches. Data on early induction of stomatal response by a brief ABA pulse in vivo is almost absent, largely due to difficulties in rapid removal of ABA from intact guard cells. Application of O₃, an air pollutant efficiently utilized to study stomatal signaling,^2–4 lacks this disadvantage and allows monitoring stomatal responses to brief, clean-cut, strictly dosed pulses of this powerful oxidant in planta. Application of O₃ for 1 min to intact Arabidopsis rosette triggered a Rapid Transient Decrease (RTD) in stomatal conductance which, after lasting for 8–10 min, was followed by a 3–4 times slower recovery.³ The entire RTD, lasting for up to 40–50 min, is a conserved response in plants; to date it is found to be present in about 90 Arabidopsis ecotypes/mutants³ and also in tobacco and birch (unpublished results). Absence of RTD in protein phosphatase ABI1 and ABI2 mutants (abi1-1 and abi2-1) which are unable to form complex with PYR/PYL ABA receptors, in protein kinase OST1 and in guard cell plasma membrane anion channel SLAC1 mutants, indicates that O₃-triggered signal propagates through the same phosphatase/kinase pair as does the signal triggered by ABA.³ Results of mostly proteomic, pharmacological and electrophysiological studies allow to suggest that the most likely reason for the rapid stomatal closure during RTD is the ABI1, ABI2 and OST1 mediated alterations in a battery of plasma membrane ion channels, including the outward-rectifying anion channel SLAC1 and the depolarization-activated K⁺ channel GORK1 which after their sequential activation result in efflux of osmotica, turgor loss and stomatal closure.Physiological background of the recovery during RTD which takes place also under continuous exposure to ozone² is less understood. To study this process further we exposed whole rosettes of intact 22–25 day old Arabidopsis plants to different O₃ concentrations for 3 min as described earlier³ and observed that after exposures to high concentration O₃ pulses stomatal conductance recovered faster and reached higher values than were the preexposure values. We term this phenomenon “overshooting”.Ozone concentration of 70 nl l⁻¹ did not induce RTD (Fig. 1A). At higher concentrations O₃ induced intense decrease in stomatal conductance within 4–6 min after application. This was followed by rapid stoppage of the closure, a brief transition period and a sluggish, almost linear recovery where the pre-exposure value of stomatal conductance was reached about 30 min after the onset of O₃ (Fig. 1A). The rates and extents of the O₃-induced stomatal closure, as well as rates of reopening were concentration dependent. Continuation of the linear increase in stomatal conductance after reaching the pre-exposure value resulted in almost two-fold higher values at 50 min after the onset of 385 nl l⁻¹ of O₃. Overshootings were dependent on ozone concentration (Fig. 1B) and on the extent of the initial decrease in stomatal conductance (Fig. 1C). Both dependencies were exponential indicating a presence of threshold at 150–200 nl l⁻¹ of O₃ and at 20% of initial O₃-induced decrease in stomatal conductance, respectively.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Ozone-triggered rapid decrease in stomatal conductance is followed by recovery to higher “overshooting” values. (A) Typical asymmetric time patterns of stomatal conductance after exposure of 22–25 day old Arabidopsis plant leaf rosettes to different concentrations of ozone as described in Kollist et al.² In (B and C) O₃-induced “overshooting” is plotted against O₃ concentration and O₃-induced decrease in stomatal conductance, respectively.What could be the reason and mechanistic explanation for described O₃-induced “overshooting” in stomatal conductance? The protein kinase OST1 is required for induction of rapid closure phase of the O₃-triggered RTD.³ Besides phosphorylating SLAC1,^3,5 OST1 has been shown to phosphorylate also the inward-rectifying K⁺ channel KAT1 resulting in its inhibition.⁶ Inhibition of K⁺ uptake, which allows faster membrane depolarization and stomatal closure, has been shown to occur under various stresses.⁷ Presumably, H⁺-ATPase activity and proton pumping, tightly coupled to K⁺ uptake via channel energization⁸ are also suppressed by O₃. It has been shown that in depolarized guard cell, plasma membrane proton pumping may precede volume and turgor increase.⁹ We speculate that in the O₃-triggered, SLAC1- and GORK-mediated stomatal closure, when ion efflux and turgor loss proceed at high rates, reactivation of H⁺-ATPase and proton pumping and associated recovery of K⁺ uptake are induced to avoid guard cell plasmolysis.¹⁰ Guard cells begin to regain turgor and stomata reopen. At the same time outward-rectifying ion channels are transiently locked (inactivated) as stomata become completely insensitive to repeated O₃-pulses during recovery phase.³ This interpretation is supported by our observation that the recovery in stomatal opening is heavily suppressed in kincless mutant³ where the inward rectifying K⁺ current is abolished.¹¹ In addition, peak densities of inward K⁺ currents (2–4 µA/cm² membrane⁹) are shown to be much lower than those for outward anion and K⁺ currents (17–20 µA/cm).^2,8,12,13 This could be a reason why stomatal reopening is much slower than the initial O₃-induced closure. Our findings (Fig. 1) suggest that the faster and deeper the O₃-triggered turgor loss, the faster and extensive is its recovery. The “overshootings” suggest plasma membrane hyperpolarization and predict a viable oscillation-like stomatal behavior where the system tends to restore the initial equilibrium. Longer experiments are needed to address whether such an oscillating response exists in Arabidopsis elicited by O₃.Taken together, our data suggest the presence of a “security” mechanism in plant guard cells which avoids the excessive dehydration and precipitous turgor loss by reswitching the reaccumulation of osmotica ultimately leading to stomatal opening. Molecular mechanism(s) linking feedback from low turgor to activation of plasma membrane proton pumping and subsequent ion uptake are obscure. Irrespective of mechanism(s), our data indicate that stomata tend to recover from stress the faster the stronger has been the perturbation at its onset. Undoubtedly, rapid O₃-induced transient decrease in stomatal conductance is one of countless expressions of the Le Chatelier''s principle having numerous wordings like: “any change in status quo prompts an opposing reaction in the responding system,” or paraphrased on the basis of our results—the stronger the stimulus (O₃ concentration) the stronger the response (“overshooting”).     

Stomata and pathogens: Warfare at the gates

Bacteria and fungi are capable of triggering stomatal closure through pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which prevents penetration through these pores. Therefore, the stomata can be considered part of the plant innate immune response. Some pathogens have evolved mechanisms to evade stomatal defense. The bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc), which infects plants of the Brassicaceae family mainly through hydathodes, has also been reported to infect plants through stomata. A recent report shows that penetration of Xcc in Arabidopsis leaves through stomata depends on a secreted small molecule whose synthesis is under control of the rpf/diffusible signal factor (DSF) cell-to-cell signaling system, which also controls genes involved in biofilm formation and pathogenesis. The same reports shows that Arabidopsis ROS- and PAMP-activated MAP kinase 3 (MPK3) is essential for stomatal innate response. Other recent and past findings about modulation of stomatal behaviour by pathogens are also discussed. In all, these findings support the idea that PAMP-triggered stomatal closure might be a more effective and widespread barrier against phytopathogens than previously thought, which has in turn led to the evolution in pathogens of several mechanisms to evade stomatal defense.Key words: arabidopsis, stomata, xanthomonas, plant defense, DSF, rpf genesStomata are small pores located on the leaf surface that allow plants to exchange gases with the environment. They play an essential role in the intake of CO₂ for photosynthesis, but at the same time they allow water loss by transpiration. Their position at the interface between internal plant tissues and the environment make them convenient gates for endophytic colonization by phytopathogens. For this reason plants have evolved the capacity to adjust stomatal apertures not only in response to hormones like abscisic acid (ABA) and to diverse environmental factors such as light, air humidity and carbon dioxide but also in response to pathogens. Past studies, conducted with fungal and bacterial pathogens that enter leaves through stomata, have shown that many of these organisms display tropic movements towards them. After infection, these microorganisms may affect stomatal behavior in diverse ways, a fact which has been attributed to the interplay between fungal and plant compounds secreted during the plant-pathogen interaction (reviewed in ref. 1). The effect of some of these purified compounds on stomatal movements has been reported. For example, the fungal elicitors oligogalacturonic acid and chitosan,² as well as the bacterial toxin syringomycin,³ trigger stomatal closure, while Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) derived coronatine⁴ and Fusicoccum amygdali derived fusicoccin⁵ promote stomatal opening. In spite of these findings, the role of stomata in the defense against pathogens have often been overlooked.⁶ However, the recent finding that the ubiquitously present bacterial pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) flagellin and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are capable of triggering stomatal closure provided convincing evidence that stomata effectively function as part of the plant innate immunity.⁷ In the same study it was shown that coronatine, whose chemical structure is similar to methyl jasmonate, can revert bacteria- induced stomatal closure, allowing Pst to gain access into leaves even after initial stomatal response.Only relatively high concentrations of bacteria have been reported to trigger stomatal closure (10⁷–10⁸ c.f.u./ml),^5,7 which might explain why the normal microbial flora living on the phylloplane does not promote stomatal closure. Biofilm formation, which leads to bacterial aggregation, not only improves epiphytic survival of bacteria such as the phytopathogen Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri,⁸ but also appears to be a prerequisite for endophytic colonization by some pathogenic and beneficial endophytes.⁹ In the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris (Xcc), the rpf/DSF cell-to-cell signaling system controls the bacterial density dependent expression of many genes required for pathogenicity and environmental adaptation.^10–12 Some of these genes, like those involved in the synthesis of the extracellular polysaccharide xanthan, are also essential for biofilm formation.^13,14Xcc uses hydathode pores as main route on endophytic colonization of Brassicaceae, however, it has also been reported that can penetrate leaves through stomata, at least under certain conditions.¹⁵ For this reason, we investigated if penetration of Xcc through stomata can occur passively, when either environmental or physiological conditions favors stomatal opening, or if on the contrary this process is aided by some compound similar to coronatine or fusicoccin.We found that the Xcc is capable of manipulating stomatal closure of Arabidopsis through a secreted small molecule whose production is under control of the rpf/DSF gene cluster.¹⁶ Both living Xcc and an extract from an Xcc culture supernatant, can inhibit PAMP- and ABA-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. By contrast, rpfF and rpfC Xcc mutants, affected in respectively the synthesis and perception of the cell-to-cell communication signal cis-11-methyl-2-dodecenoic acid, cannot interfere with stomatal movements. The secreted factor most likely plays an important role in virulence, as Xcc supernatant extracts enhanced the ability of a Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) coronatine deficient mutant to penetrate Arabidopsis leaves.In addition, in our work we provide evidence that Arabidopsis reactive oxygen species (ROS)- and PAMP-activated MPK3 is required for PAMP triggered stomatal closure, as plants expressing a guard cell-specific antisense construct against its coding gene are unable to close stomata in response to bacteria or purified LPS, although they still respond to ABA. Our unpublished observations show that these antisense plants are also unresponsive to the epiphytic fungus Saccharomyces cerevisiae induced stomatal closure, indicating MPK3 integrates information coming from different receptors involved in pathogen perception.Since different pathogens and elicitors induce ROS production, it is likely that these compounds act as a signaling link between elicitor perception and MPK3 activation in guard cells. In agreement with this hypothesis, the yeast derived elicitor and chitosan, both capable of triggering plant defense responses, also cause an elevation in guard cell free cytosolic Ca²⁺.¹⁷ This increase depends on the presence of cytosolic NAD(P)H, the substrate of the NAD(P)H oxidases involved in ROS production. Increases in both ROS and free cytosolic Ca²⁺ are linked to ABA-induced stomatal closure.¹⁸ However, antisense MPK3 plants showed normal promotion of closure in response to ABA but no response to phytopathogens or to H₂O₂. How can this apparent paradox be solved? As ABA is known to trigger many different signaling events within guard cells, we propose that ABA signaling acts redundantly to promote closure in guard cells, while signaling of PAMPs in these cells relies absolutely on H₂O₂, making the presence of MPK3 a necessary requirement for pathogen-induced stomatal closure. Interestingly, MPK3 antisense plants also turned out to be insensitive to the Xcc factor in ABA-induced promotion of closure, which suggests that the Xcc factor targets some signaling component acting on the same pathway as MPK3.H₂O₂ has been shown to inhibit guard cell H⁺-ATPase activity, 19 it might be possible that the Xcc factor acts by indirectly relieving pathogen-induced, H₂O₂-mediated, inactivation of H⁺-ATPase activity. In agreement with this proposal, it has been recently found that Arabidopsis RIN4, a negative regulator of plant immunity, is expressed in guard cells and upregulates PM H⁺-ATPase activity,²⁰ rin4 mutant stomata can not be reopened by virulent Pst, indicating that these plants are insensitive to coronatine. The fusicoccin toxin also inhibits H⁺-ATPase, although by a different mechanism that involves direct binding to this protein.²¹The cell-to-cell signaling system rpf/DSF regulates in a cell density dependent manner the expression of several genes involved in biofilm formation and endophytic colonization, including the suppressors of plant defenses, xanthan and β-cyclic glucan.^22,23 The factor capable of modulating stomatal responses also suppresses plant innate immunity, and therefore explains one of the multiple mechanisms by which the rpf/DSF gene cluster coordinates endophytic colonization of Xcc. While biofilm formation helps endophytic colonization, it is unlikely that it is a prerequisite for bacterial penetration through stomata, since this can take place in isolated epidermis aided without biofilm formation, provided that coronatine⁷ or the Xcc factor¹⁶ are present. Furthermore, even rpfF or rpfC mutants, unable to synthesize or perceive the Xcc cell-to-cell signaling molecule DSF, are capable of migrating through isolated epidermis in the presence of a wt Xcc extract.The chemical nature of the Xcc factor has not been elucidated yet. While preliminary characterization indicates that it shares some common properties with coronatine (has a MW of <2,000 kD, and can be extracted from culture supernatants with ethyl acetate), it is unlikely that they are the same molecule, as the enzymes required for coronatine biosynthesis are encoded in a plasmid or chromosome of only some pathovars of P. syringae. The fungal toxin fusicoccin is also probably different from the Xcc factor as, unlike this, it causes a very strong promotion of stomatal opening.Recently, it has been reported that the phytopathogenic fungi Rhynchosporium secalis and Plasmopara viticola can modulate stomatal behaviour²⁴ and that oxalic acid, a virulence factor produced by many fungi, can promote stomatal opening.²⁵ In addition, the human pathogen Salmonella enterica displays tropism towards photosynthetically active lettuce guard cells and possesses the ability of penetrating through them—suggesting that it may have some mechanism to disable stomatal defense.²⁶ While S. enterica is not a plant pathogen, endophytic colonization may be an important part of it life cycle, before being eaten by a host animal. The examples mentioned above rise the interesting possibility that mechanisms to overcome stomatal innate defense may be more common than previously thought, and that they might have evolved independently in different pathogens. Characterization of more pathogen molecules involved in modulation of stomatal defense and of their targets inside guard cells might provide exciting new tools to study stomatal physiology, as well as helping in the discovery of new strategies to prevent pathogen penetration inside leaves.     

Antagonism between abscisic acid and gibberellins is partially mediated by ascorbic acid during seed germination in rice

The antagonism between abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellin (GA) plays a key role in controlling seed germination,^1,2 but the mechanism of antagonism during this process is not known. In the associated study,³ we investigated the relationship among ABA, reactive oxygen species (ROS), ascorbic acid (ASC) and GA during rice seed germination. ROS production is reduced by ABA, which hence results in decreasing ASC accumulation during imbibition. GA accumulation was also suppressed by a reduced ROS and ASC level, whereas application of exogenous ASC can partially rescue seed germination from ABA treatment. Further results show that production of ASC, which acts as a substrate in GA biosynthesis, was significantly inhibited by lycorine which thus suppressed the accumulation of GA. Consequently, expression of GA biosynthesis genes was suppressed by the low levels of ROS and ASC in ABA-treated seeds. These studies reveal a new role for ASC in mediating the antagonism between ABA and GA during seed germination in rice.     

ABA-dependent amine oxidases-derived H2O2 affects stomata conductance

Recently we showed that ABA is at least partly responsible for the induction of the polyamine exodus pathway in Vitis vinifera plants. Both sensitive and tolerant plants employ this pathway to orchestrate stress responses, differing between stress adaptation and programmed cell death. Herein we show that ABA is an upstream signal for the induction of the polyamine catabolic pathway in Vitis vinifera. Thus, amine oxidases are producing H₂O₂ which signals stomata closure. Moreover, the previously proposed model for the polyamine catabolic pathway is updated and discussed.Key words: plant growth, abscissic acid, polyamines, amine oxidases, signaling, oxidative stress, programmed cell deathWe have shown that tobacco salinity induces an exodus of the polyamine (PA) spermidine (Spd) into the apoplast where it is oxidized by polyamine oxidase (PAO) generating hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂). Depending on the size of H₂O₂, it signals either tolerance-effector genes or the programmed cell death syndrome¹ (PCD). PAs are ubiquitous and biologically active molecules. In the recent years remarkable progress has been accomplished regarding the regulation of PAs biosynthesis and catalysis, not only under normal physiological but also under stress conditions.¹ The most studied PAs are the diamine Putrescine (Put) and its derivatives the triamine Spd and the tetramine spermine (Spm). They are present in the cells in soluble form (S), or conjugated either to low molecular weight compounds (soluble hydrolyzed form, SH) or to “macro” molecules or cell walls (pellet hydrolyzed form, PH). In higher plants, Put is synthesized either directly from ornithine via ornithine decarboxylase (ODC; EC 4.1.1.17) or indirectly from arginine via arginine decarboxylase (ADC; EC 4.1.1.19). Spd and Spm are synthesized via Spd synthase (EC 2.5.1.16, SPDS) and Spm synthase (EC 2.5.1.22, SPMS), respectively, by sequential addition of aminopropyl groups to Put, catalyzed by S-adenosyl-L-methionine decarboxylase (SAMDC; EC 4.1.1.50).^2,3 In plants, PAs are present in the cytoplasm, as well as in cellular organelles.⁴ Recently it was shown that during stress, they are secreted into the apoplast where they are oxidized by amine oxidases (AOs), such as diamine oxidase for Put (DAO, E.C. 1.4.3.6) and polyamine oxidase (PAO, E.C. 1.4.3.4) for Spd and Spm.^1,5,6 Oxidation of PAs generates, amongst other products, H₂O₂^1,7,8 which is involved in cell signaling processes coordinated by abscissic acid (ABA),⁹ but also acts as efficient oxidant and, at high concentration, orchestrates the PCD syndrome.^6,10 Two types of PA catabolism by PAO are known in plants: the terminal and the back-conversion pathways. The terminal one takes place in the apoplast, produces except H₂O₂, 1,3-diaminopropane and an aldehyde depending on the species. On the other hand, the back-conversion pathway is intracellular (cytoplasm and peroxisomes) resulting to the production of H₂O₂ and the sequential production of Put by Spm via Spd.^1,7 Now we have shown that PA exodus also occurs in Vitis vinifera and this phenomenon is at least partially induced by abscissic acid (ABA).¹¹ Thus, exogenous application of ABA results to PA exodus into the apoplast of grapevine. PA is oxidized by an AO resulting to production of H₂O₂. When the titer of H₂O₂ is below a threshold, expression of tolerance-effector genes is induced, while when it exceeds this threshold the programmed cell death (PCD) syndrome is induced.     

Roles of heterotrimeric G proteins in guard cell ion channel regulation

Stomata are formed by pairs of surrounding guard cells and perform important roles in photosynthesis, transpiration and innate immunity of terrestrial plants. Ionic solutes in the cytosol of guard cells are important for cell turgor and volume change. Consequently, trans-membrane flux of ions such as K⁺, Cl⁻, and malate2⁻ through K⁺ channels and anion channels of guard cells are a direct driving force for turgor change, while the opening of calcium permeable channels can serve as a trigger of cytosolic free calcium concentration elevations or oscillations, which play second messenger roles. In plants, heterotrimeric G proteins have fewer members than in animals, but they are well investigated and found to regulate these channels and to play fundamental roles in guard cell function. This mini-review focuses on the recent understanding of G-protein regulation of ion channels on the plasma membrane of guard cells and their participation in stomatal movements.Key words: guard cell, heterotrimeric G protein, ion channel, arabidopsis thaliana, stomata, plasma membrane, patch clampHeterotrimeric G proteins, composed of Gα, Gβ and Gγ subunits, are key elements of cellular signal transduction networks. In plant species, fewer members of G proteins are present than in animals. For example, only one Gα subunit (GPA1), one Gβ subunit (AGB1) and two Gγ subunits (AGG1 and AGG2) are reported in Arabidopsis while 23 Gα, 5 Gβ and 12 Gγ subunits have been identified in human.¹ All three kinds of subunits are expressed in guard cells. Ubiquitous expression of GPA1 throughout plant was ascertained by northern and promoter::GUS analyses and RT-PCR results also indicate guard cell expression.^2–4 AGB1 is ubiquitously expressed throughout the plant and its promoter::GUS transgenic lines show strong expression in guard cells.^5–7 For Gγ subunits, RNA blots show AGG1 and AGG2 expression throughout the plant, however, reporter gene analysis shows guard cell expression of AGG2 but not AGG1.^7–9 The guard cell expression of G protein subunits implies the function of G protein in guard cell signaling and stomatal movement regulation.Stomata are microscopic pores in the epidermis of terrestrial plants, which serve as the mouths of plants for gas change since through them CO₂ enters leaves for photosynthesis and water vapor is lost as transpiration.^10–13 In addition, stomatal movements induced by pathogen and pathogen/microbe-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs or MAMPs) are a component of the plant innate immunity system.^14–16 Biotic and abiotic stresses (e.g. water deficiency, cold, pathogens) and their induced phytohormone changes (e.g. abscisic acid [ABA], ethylene) have been widely investigated in stomatal movement regulation, and stomatal apertures are directly regulated by volume change of the surrounding guard cell pairs. The accumulation/release of ionic solutes through ion channels on the guard-cell plasma membrane together with malate production/metabolism induces water influx/efflux driving increase/decrease of cell turgor and volume which co-operates with the radial reinforcement of the guard cell walls to widen/shrink stomatal aperture.^10,17 Given that mature guard cells lack plasmodesmata with neighboring cells, all ion uptake and efflux must pass through ion channels and ion transporters on the plasma membrane.In Arabidopsis guard cells, the model cell type for cell signaling of the model plant species, all three kinds of ion channels (K⁺ channels, anion channels and Ca²⁺-permeable channels) have been investigated and found to be regulated by heterotrimeric G proteins.^10,17 Their ion channel activities can be measured in intact guard cells, guard cell protoplasts, or cell membrane patches using the patch clamp technique.^15,18,19 Patch clamping can be used to measure ion fluxes in whole cells or even through a single ion channel.^20,21 The patch clamp technique under the whole-cell recording configuration can measure the currents through hyperpolarization-activated inward K⁺ channels which account for K⁺ accumulation during stomatal opening, and the depolarizationactivated outward K⁺ channels which, together with R-type and S-type anion channels, mediate solute removal during stomatal closure. Besides these ionic fluxes which directly elicit changes in turgor, Ca²⁺-permeable channels which participate in Ca²⁺ signaling are also regulated by G proteins. For better visualization of the currents through K⁺, anion and Ca²⁺permeable channels, real current traces and their idealized current/voltage relationships are indicated in Figure 1. The G-protein regulation of inward and outward K⁺ channels, S-type anion channels, and Ca²⁺-permeable channels and their significance for stomatal movements will be discussed below, and the genes encoding them which have been explored up to now also will be discussed.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Current traces and idealized current/voltage relationships of wild type guard cell plasma membrane ion channels involved in G-protein regulation (A–C), ABA inhibition of whole-cell inward K⁺ currents. (A) indicates inward K⁺ currents of wild type guard cell protoplasts in response to hyperpolarizing voltages under control conditions [Scale bar is shown in (B)]; (B) indicates inward K+ currents of wild type guard cell protoplasts with ABA treatment; (C) indicates the idealized current/voltage relationship of inward K⁺ currents for control (gray) and ABA treatments (black). (D–F), ABA activation of slow anion currents. (D) indicates anion currents of wild type under control condition and (E) shows current after ABA treatment; (F) indicates the idealized current/voltage relationship of anion currents for control (gray) and ABA treatments (black). (G–I), ABA activation of currents through Ca²⁺-permeable channels. (G) indicates currents through Ca²⁺-permeable channels of wild type under control condition and (H) shows current after ABA treatments; (I) indicates the idealized current/voltage relationship of currents through Ca²⁺-permeable channels for control (gray) and ABA treatments (black).