首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
As a second messenger, H2O2 generation and signal transduction is subtly controlled and involves various signal elements, among which are the members of MAP kinase family. The increasing evidences indicate that both MEK1/2 and p38-like MAP protein kinase mediate ABA-induced H2O2 signaling in plant cells. Here we analyze the mechanisms of similarity and difference between MEK1/2 and p38-like MAP protein kinase in mediating ABA-induced H2O2 generation, inhibition of inward K+ currents, and stomatal closure. These data suggest that activation of MEK1/2 is prior to p38-like protein kinase in Vicia guard cells.Key words: H2O2 signaling, ABA, p38-like MAP kinase, MEK1/2, guard cellAn increasing number of literatures elucidate that reactive oxygen species (ROS), especially H2O2, is essential to plant growth and development in response to stresses,14 and involves activation of various signaling events, among which are the MAP kinase cascades.13,5 Typically, activation of MEK1/2 mediates NADPH oxidase-dependent ROS generation in response to stresses,4,68 and the facts that MEK1/2 inhibits the expression and activation of antioxidant enzymes reveal how PD98059, the specific inhibitor of MEK1/2, abolishes abscisic acid (ABA)-induced H2O2 generation.6,8,9 It has been indicated that PD98059 does not to intervene on salicylic acid (SA)-stimulated H2O2 signaling regardless of SA mimicking ABA in regulating stomatal closure.2,6,8,10 Generally, activation of MEK1/2 promotes ABA-induced stomatal closure by elevating H2O2 generation in conjunction with inactivating anti-oxidases.Moreover, activation of plant p38-like protein kinase, the putative counterpart of yeast or mammalian p38 MAP kinase, has been reported to participate in various stress responses and ROS signaling. It has been well documented that p38 MAP kinase is involved in stress-triggered ROS signaling in yeast or mammalian cells.1113 Similar to those of yeast and mammals, many studies showed the activation of p38-like protein kinase in response to stresses in various plants, including Arabidopsis thaliana,1416 Pisum sativum,17 Medicago sativa18 and tobacco.19 The specific p38 kinase inhibitor SB203580 was found to modulate physiological processes in plant tissues or cells, such as wheat root cells,20 tobacco tissue21 and suspension-cultured Oryza sativa cells.22 Recently, we investigate how activation of p38-like MAP kinase is involved in ABA-induced H2O2 signaling in guard cells. Our results show that SB203580 blocks ABA-induced stomatal closure by inhibiting ABA-induced H2O2 generation and decreasing K+ influx across the plasma membrane of Vicia guard cells, contrasting greatly with its analog SB202474, which has no effect on these events.23,24 This suggests that ABA integrate activation of p38-like MAP kinase and H2O2 signaling to regulate stomatal behavior. In conjunction with SB203580 mimicking PD98059 not to mediate SA-induced H2O2 signaling,23,24 these results generally reveal that the activation of p38-like MAP kinase and MEK1/2 is similar in guard cells.On the other hand, activation of p38-like MAP kinase23,24 is not always identical to that of MEK1/28,25 in ABA-induced H2O2 signaling of Vicia guard cells. For example, H2O2- and ABA-induced stomatal closure was partially reversed by SB203580. The maximum inhibition of both regent-induced stomatal closure were observed at 2 h after treatment with SB203580, under which conditions the stomatal apertures were 89% and 70% of the control values, respectively. By contrast, when PD98059 was applied together with ABA or H2O2, the effects of both ABA- and H2O2-induced stomatal closure were completely abolished (Fig. 1). These data imply that the two members of MAP kinase family are efficient in H2O2-stimulated stomatal closure, but p38-like MAP kinase is less susceptive than MEK1/2 to ABA stimuli.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Effects of SB203580 and PD98059 on ABA- and H2O2-induced stomatal closure. The experimental procedure and data analysis are according to the previous publication.8,23,24It has been reported that ABA or NaCl activate p38 MAP kinase in the chloronema cells of the moss Funaria hygrometrica in 2∼10 min.26 Similar to this, SB203580 improves H2O2-inhibited inward K+ currents after 4 min and leads it to the control level (100%) during the following 8 min (Fig. 2). However, the activation of p38-like MAP kinase in response to ABA need more time, and only recovered to 75% of the control at 8 min of treatment (Fig. 2). These results suggest that control of H2O2 signaling is required for the various protein kinases including p38-like MAP kinase and MEK1/2 in guard cells,1,2,8,23,24 and the ABA and H2O2 pathways diverge further downstream in their actions on the K+ channels and, thus, on stomatal control. Other differences in action between ABA and H2O2 are known. For example, Köhler et al. (2001) reported that H2O2 inhibited the K+ outward rectifier in guard cells shows that H2O2 does not mimic ABA action on guard cell ion channels as it acts on the K+ outward rectifier in a manner entirely contrary to that of ABA.27Open in a separate windowFigure 2Effect of SB203580 on ABA- and H2O2-inhibited inward K+ currents. The experimental procedure and data analysis are according to the previous publication.24 SB203580 directs ABA- and H2O2-inactivated inward K+ currents across plasma membrane of Vicia guard cells. Here the inward K+ currents value is stimulated by −190 mV voltage.Based on the similarity and difference between PD98059 and SB203580 in interceding ABA and H2O2 signaling, we speculate the possible mechanism is that the member of MAP kinase family specially regulate signal event in ABA-triggered ROS signaling network,14 and the signaling model as follows (Fig. 3).Open in a separate windowFigure 3Schematic illustration of MAP kinase-mediated H2O2 signaling of guard cells. The arrows indicate activation. The line indicates enhancement and the bar denotes inhibition.  相似文献   

2.
3.
Recently we showed that ABA is at least partly responsible for the induction of the polyamine exodus pathway in Vitis vinifera plants. Both sensitive and tolerant plants employ this pathway to orchestrate stress responses, differing between stress adaptation and programmed cell death. Herein we show that ABA is an upstream signal for the induction of the polyamine catabolic pathway in Vitis vinifera. Thus, amine oxidases are producing H2O2 which signals stomata closure. Moreover, the previously proposed model for the polyamine catabolic pathway is updated and discussed.Key words: plant growth, abscissic acid, polyamines, amine oxidases, signaling, oxidative stress, programmed cell deathWe have shown that tobacco salinity induces an exodus of the polyamine (PA) spermidine (Spd) into the apoplast where it is oxidized by polyamine oxidase (PAO) generating hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Depending on the size of H2O2, it signals either tolerance-effector genes or the programmed cell death syndrome1 (PCD). PAs are ubiquitous and biologically active molecules. In the recent years remarkable progress has been accomplished regarding the regulation of PAs biosynthesis and catalysis, not only under normal physiological but also under stress conditions.1 The most studied PAs are the diamine Putrescine (Put) and its derivatives the triamine Spd and the tetramine spermine (Spm). They are present in the cells in soluble form (S), or conjugated either to low molecular weight compounds (soluble hydrolyzed form, SH) or to “macro” molecules or cell walls (pellet hydrolyzed form, PH). In higher plants, Put is synthesized either directly from ornithine via ornithine decarboxylase (ODC; EC 4.1.1.17) or indirectly from arginine via arginine decarboxylase (ADC; EC 4.1.1.19). Spd and Spm are synthesized via Spd synthase (EC 2.5.1.16, SPDS) and Spm synthase (EC 2.5.1.22, SPMS), respectively, by sequential addition of aminopropyl groups to Put, catalyzed by S-adenosyl-L-methionine decarboxylase (SAMDC; EC 4.1.1.50).2,3 In plants, PAs are present in the cytoplasm, as well as in cellular organelles.4 Recently it was shown that during stress, they are secreted into the apoplast where they are oxidized by amine oxidases (AOs), such as diamine oxidase for Put (DAO, E.C. 1.4.3.6) and polyamine oxidase (PAO, E.C. 1.4.3.4) for Spd and Spm.1,5,6 Oxidation of PAs generates, amongst other products, H2O21,7,8 which is involved in cell signaling processes coordinated by abscissic acid (ABA),9 but also acts as efficient oxidant and, at high concentration, orchestrates the PCD syndrome.6,10 Two types of PA catabolism by PAO are known in plants: the terminal and the back-conversion pathways. The terminal one takes place in the apoplast, produces except H2O2, 1,3-diaminopropane and an aldehyde depending on the species. On the other hand, the back-conversion pathway is intracellular (cytoplasm and peroxisomes) resulting to the production of H2O2 and the sequential production of Put by Spm via Spd.1,7 Now we have shown that PA exodus also occurs in Vitis vinifera and this phenomenon is at least partially induced by abscissic acid (ABA).11 Thus, exogenous application of ABA results to PA exodus into the apoplast of grapevine. PA is oxidized by an AO resulting to production of H2O2. When the titer of H2O2 is below a threshold, expression of tolerance-effector genes is induced, while when it exceeds this threshold the programmed cell death (PCD) syndrome is induced.  相似文献   

4.
5.
6.
Sphinganine or dihydrosphingosine (d18:0, DHS), one of the most abundant free sphingoid Long Chain Base (LCB) in plants, is known to induce a calcium-dependent programmed cell death (PCD) in tobacco BY-2 cells. We have recently shown that DHS triggers a production of H2O2, via the activation of NADPH oxidase(s). However, this production of H2O2 is not correlated with the DHS-induced cell death but would rather be associated with basal cell defense mechanisms. In the present study, we extend our current knowledge of the DHS signaling pathway, by demonstrating that DHS also promotes a production of nitric oxide (NO) in tobacco BY-2 cells. As for H2O2, this NO production is not necessary for cell death induction.Key words: tobacco BY-2 cells, sphingolipids, LCBs, dihydrosphingosine, sphinganine, apoptosis, programmed cell death (PCD), nitric oxide (NO)These last few years, it has been demonstrated in plants that long chain bases (LCBs), the sphingolipid precursors, are important regulators of different cellular processes including programmed cell death (PCD).13 Indeed, plant treatment with fumonisin B1 or AAL toxin, two mycotoxins that disrupt sphingolipid metabolism, leads to an accumulation of the dihydrosphingosine (d18:0, DHS), one of the most abundant free LCB in plants and correlatively to the induction of cell death symptoms.4,5 A more recent study shows a rapid and sustained increase of phytosphingosine (t18:0), due to a de novo synthesis from DHS, when Arabidopsis thaliana leaves are inoculated with the avirulent strain Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (avrRpm1), known to induce a localized PCD called hypersensitive response (HR).6 More direct evidences were obtained from experiments on Arabidopsis cells where external application of 100 µM C2-ceramide, a non-natural acylated LCB, induced PCD in a calcium (Ca2+)-dependent manner.7 Recently, we have shown that DHS elicited rapid Ca2+ increases both in the cytosol and the nucleus of tobacco BY-2 cells and correlatively induced apoptotic-like response. Interestingly, blocking nuclear Ca2+ changes without affecting the cytosolic Ca2+ increases prevented DHS-induced PCD.8Besides calcium ions, reactive oxygen species (ROS) have also been suggested to play an important role in the control of PCD induced by sphingolipids in plants.9 Thus, the C2-ceramide-induced PCD in Arabidopsis is preceded by an increase in H2O2.7 However, inhibition of ROS production by catalase, a ROS-scavenging enzyme, did not prevent C2-ceramide-induced cell death, suggesting that this PCD is independent of ROS generation. Moreover, we recently showed in tobacco BY-2 cells that DHS triggers a dose-dependent production of H2O2 via activation of a NADPH oxidase.10 The DHS-induced cytosolic Ca2+ transient is required for this H2O2 production while the nuclear calcium variation is not necessary. In agreement with the results of Townley et al. blocking the ROS production using diphenyleniodonium (DPI), a known inhibitor of NADPH oxidases, does not prevent DHS-induced cell death. Gene expression analysis of defense-related genes, using real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) experiments, rather indicates that H2O2 generation is likely associated with basal defense mechanisms.10In the present study, we further investigated the DHS signaling cascade leading to cell death in tobacco BY-2 cells, by evaluating the involvement of another key signaling molecule i.e., nitric oxide (NO). In plants, NO is known to play important roles in numerous physiological processes including germination, root growth, stomatal closing and adapative response to biotic and abiotic stresses (reviewed in ref. 1114). NO has also been shown to be implicated in the induction of PCD in animal cells,15 in yeast,16 as well as in plant cells, in which it is required for tracheid differentiation17 or HR activation.18,19 Interestingly in the latter case, the balance between NO and H2O2 production appears to be crucial to induce cell death.20 Here we show in tobacco BY-2 cells that although DHS elicits a production of NO, this production is not necessary for the induction of PCD.  相似文献   

7.
8.
9.
10.
In our recent paper in the Plant Journal, we reported that Arabidopsis thaliana lysophospholipase 2 (lysoPL2) binds acyl-CoA-binding protein 2 (ACBP2) to mediate cadmium [Cd(II)] tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. ACBP2 contains ankyrin repeats that have been previously shown to mediate protein-protein interactions with an ethylene-responsive element binding protein (AtEBP) and a farnesylated protein 6 (AtFP6). Transgenic Arabidopsis ACBP2-overexpressors, lysoPL2-overexpressors and AtFP6-overexpressors all display enhanced Cd(II) tolerance, in comparison to wild type, suggesting that ACBP2 and its protein partners work together to mediate Cd(II) tolerance. Given that recombinant ACBP2 and AtFP6 can independently bind Cd(II) in vitro, they may be able to participate in Cd(II) translocation. The binding of recombinant ACBP2 to [14C]linoleoyl-CoA and [14C]linolenoyl-CoA implies its role in phospholipid repair. In conclusion, ACBP2 can mediate tolerance to Cd(II)-induced oxidative stress by interacting with two protein partners, AtFP6 and lysoPL2. Observations that ACBP2 also binds lysophosphatidylcholine (lysoPC) in vitro and that recombinant lysoPL2 degrades lysoPC, further confirm an interactive role for ACBP2 and lysoPL2 in overcoming Cd(II)-induced stress.Key words: acyl-CoA-binding protein, cadmium, hydrogen peroxide, lysophospholipase, oxidative stressAcyl-CoA-binding proteins (ACBP1 to ACBP6) are encoded by a multigene family in Arabidopsis thaliana.1 These ACBP proteins are well studied in Arabidopsis in comparison to other organisms,14 and are located in various subcellular compartments.1 Plasma membranelocalized ACBP1 and ACBP2 contain ankyrin repeats that have been shown to function in protein-protein interactions.5,6 ACBP1 and ACBP2 which share 76.9% amino acid identity also confer tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis to lead [Pb(II)] and Cd(II), respectively.1,5,7 Since recombinant ACBP1 and ACBP2 bind linolenoyl-CoA and linoleoyl-CoA in vitro, they may possibly be involved in phospholipid repair in response to heavy metal stress at the plasma membrane.5,7 In contrast, ACBP3 is an extracellularly-localized protein8 while ACBP4, ACBP5 and ACBP6 are localized to cytosol.9,10 ACBP1 and ACBP6 have recently been shown to be involved in freezing stress.9,11 ACBP4 and ACBP5 bind oleoyl-CoA ester and their mRNA expressions are lightregulated.12,13 Besides acyl-CoA esters, some ACBPs also bind phospholipids.9,11,13 To investigate the biological function of ACBP2, we have proceeded to establish its interactors at the ankyrin repeats, including AtFP6,5 AtEBP6 and now lysoPL2 in the Plant Journal paper. While the significance in the interaction of ACBP2 with AtEBP awaits further investigations, some parallels can be drawn between those of ACBP2 with AtFP6 and with lysoPL2.  相似文献   

11.
12.
13.
14.
Long chain bases or sphingoid bases are building blocks of complex sphingolipids that display a signaling role in programmed cell death in plants. So far, the type of programmed cell death in which these signaling lipids have been demonstrated to participate is the cell death that occurs in plant immunity, known as the hypersensitive response. The few links that have been described in this pathway are: MPK6 activation, increased calcium concentrations and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. The latter constitute one of the more elusive loops because of the chemical nature of ROS, the multiple possible cell sites where they can be formed and the ways in which they influence cell structure and function.Key words: hydrogen peroxide, long chain bases, programmed cell death, reactive oxygen species, sphinganine, sphingoid bases, superoxideA new transduction pathway that leads to programmed cell death (PCD) in plants has started to be unveiled.1,2 Sphingoid bases or long chain bases (LCBs) are the distinctive elements in this PCD route that naturally operates in the entrance site of a pathogen as a way to contend its spread in the plant tissues.2,3 This defense strategy has been known as the hypersensitive response (HR).4,5As a lately discovered PCD signaling circuit, three connected transducers have been clearly identified in Arabidopsis: the LCB sphinganine (also named dihydrosphingosine or d18:0); MPK6, a mitogen activated kinase and superoxide and hydrogen peroxide as reactive oxygen species (ROS).1,2 In addition, calcium transients have been recently allocated downstream of exogenously added sphinganine in tobacco cells.6Contrary to the signaling lipids derived from complex glycerolipid degradation, sphinganine, a metabolic precursor of complex sphingolipids, is raised by de novo synthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum to mediate PCD.1,2 Our recent work demonstrated that only MPK6 and not MPK3 (commonly functionally redundant kinases) acts in this pathway and is positioned downstream of sphinganine elevation.2 Although ROS have been identified downstream of LCBs in the route towards PCD,1 the molecular system responsible for this ROS generation, their cellular site of formation and their precise role in the pathway have not been unequivocally identified. ROS are produced in practically all cell compartments as a result of energy transfer reactions, leaks from the electron transport chains, and oxidase and peroxidase catalysis.7Similar to what is observed in pathogen defense,3 increases in endogenous LCBs may be elicited by addition of fumonisin B1 (FB1) as well; FB1 is a mycotoxin that inhibits ceramide synthase. This inhibition results in an accumulation of its substrate, sphinganine and its modified forms, leading to the activation of PCD.1,2,8 The application of FB1 is a commonly used approach for the study of PCD elicitation in Arabidopsis.1,2,911An early production of ROS has been linked to an increase of LCBs. For example, an H2O2 burst is found in tobacco cells after 2–20 min of sphinganine supplementation,12 and superoxide radical augmented in the medium 60 min after FB1 or sphinganine addition to Arabidopsis protoplasts (Fig. 1A). In consonance with this timing, both superoxide and H2O2 were detected in Arabidopsis leaves after 3–6 h exposure to FB1 or LCBs.1 However, the source of ROS generation associated with sphinganine elevation seems to not be the same in both species: in tobacco cells, ROS formation is apparently dependent on a NADPH oxidase activity, a ROS source consistently implicated in the HR,13,14 while in Arabidopsis, superoxide formation was unaffected by diphenyliodonium (DPI), a NADPH oxidase inhibitor (Fig. 1A). It is possible that the latter oxidative burst is due to an apoplastic peroxidase,15 or to intracellular ROS that diffuse outwards.16,17 These results also suggest that both tobacco and Arabidopsis cells could produce ROS from different sources.Open in a separate windowFigure 1ROS are produced at early and long times in the FB1-induced PCD in Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0). (A) Superoxide formation by Arabidopsis protoplasts is NADPH oxidase-independent and occurs 60 min after FB1 or sphinganine (d18:0) exposure. Protoplasts were obtained from a cell culture treated with cell wall lytic enzymes. Protoplasts were incubated with 10 µM FB1 or 10 µM sphinganine for 1 h. Then, cells were vacuum-filtered and the filtrate was used to determine XTT [2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide, disodium salt] reduction as described in references 28 and 29. DPI was used at 50 µM. (B) H2O2 formation in Arabidopsis wt and lcb2a-1 mutant in the presence and absence of FB1. Arabidopsis seedlings were exposed to 10 µM FB1 and after 48 h seedlings were treated with DA B (3,3-diaminobencidine) to detect H2O2 according to Thordal-Christensen et al.30It has been suggested that the H2O2 burst associated with the sphinganine signaling pathway leads to the expression of defense-related genes but not to the PCD itself in tobacco cells.12 It is possible that ROS are involved in the same way in Arabidopsis, since defense gene expression is also induced by FB1 in Arabidopsis.9 In this case, it will be important to define how the early ROS that are DPI-insensitive could contribute to the PCD manifestation mediated by sphinganine.The generation of ROS (4–60 min) found in Arabidopsis was associated to three conditions: the addition of sphinganine (Fig. 1A), FB1 (Fig. 1A) or pathogen elicitors.15 This is consistent with the MPK6 activation time, which is downstream of sphinganine elevation and occurs as early as 15 min of FB1 or sphinganine exposure.2 All of them are events that appear as initial steps in the relay pathway that produces PCD.In order to explore a possible participation of ROS at more advanced times of PCD progression, we detected in situ H2O2 formation in Arabidopsis seedlings previously exposed to FB1 for 48 h. As shown in Figure 1B, formation of the brown-reddish precipitate corresponding to the reaction of H2O2 with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) was only visible in the FB1-exposed wild type plants, as compared to the non-treated plants. However, when lcb2a-1 mutant seedlings were used, FB1 exposure had a subtle effect in ROS formation. This mutant has a T-DNA insertion in the gene encoding subunit LCB2a from serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT), which catalyzes the first step in sphingolipid synthesis18 and the mutant has a FB1-resistant phenotype.2 These results indicate that mutations in the LCB11 and LCB2a2 genes (coding for the subunits of the heterodimeric SPT) that lead to a non-PCD phenotype upon the FB1 treatment, are unable to produce H2O2. In addition, they suggest that high levels of hydrogen peroxide are produced at advanced times in the PCD mediated by LCBs in Arabidopsis.Exposure of Arabidopsis to an avirulent strain of Pseudomonas syringae produces an endogenous elevation of LCBs as a way to implement defense responses that include HR-PCD.3 In this condition, we clearly detected H2O2 formation inside chloroplasts (Fig. 2A). When ultrastructure of the seedlings tissues exposed to FB1 for 72 h was analyzed, integrity of the chloroplast membrane system was severely affected in Arabidopsis wild-type seedlings exposed to FB1.2 Therefore, we suggest that ROS generation-LCB induced in the chloroplast could be responsible of the observed membrane alteration, as noted by Liu et al. who found impairment in chloroplast function as a result of H2O2 formation in this organelle from tobacco plants. Interestingly, these plants overexpressed a MAP kinase kinase that activated the kinase SIPK, which is the ortholog of the MPK6 from Arabidopsis, a transducer in the PCD instrumented by LCBs.2Open in a separate windowFigure 2Conditions of LCBs elevation produce H2O2 formation in the chloroplast and perturbation in the membrane morphology of mitochondria. (A) Exposure of Arabidopsis leaves to the avirulent strain Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (avrRPM1) (or Pst avrRPM1) induces H2O2 formation in the chloroplast. Arabidopsis leaves were infiltrated with 1 × 108 UFC/ml Pst avrRPM1 and after 18 h, samples were treated to visualize H2O2 formation with the DAB reaction. Controls were infiltrated with 10 mM MgCl2 and then processed for DAB staining. Then, samples were analyzed in an optical photomicroscope Olympus Provis Model AX70. (B) Effect of FB1 on mitochondria ultrastructure. Wild type Arabidopsis seedlings were treated with FB1 for 72 h and tissues were processed and analyzed according to Saucedo et al.2 Ch, chloroplast; M, mitochondria; PM, plasma membrane. Arrows show mitochondrial cisternae. Bars show the correspondent magnification.In addition, we have detected alterations in mitochondria ultrastructure as a result of 72 h of FB1 exposure (Fig. 2B). These alterations mainly consist in the reduced number of cristae, the membrane site of residence of the electron transport complexes. In this sense, it has been shown that factors that induce PCD such as the victorin toxin, methyl jasmonate and H2O2 produce alterations in mitochondrial morphology.2022 In fact, some of these studies propose that ROS are formed in the mitochondria and then diffuse to the chloroplasts.2224It is reasonable to envisage that damage of the membrane integrity of these two organelles reflects the effects of vast amounts of ROS produced by the electron transport chains.25,26 Recent evidence supports the destruction of the photosynthetic apparatus associated to the generation of ROS in the HR.26 At this time of PCD progression, ROS could be contributing to shut down the energy machinery in the cell, which ultimately would become the point of no-return of PCD27 as part of the execution program of the cell death mediated by LCBs.In conclusion, we propose that ROS can display two different functional roles in the PCD process driven by LCBs. These roles depend on the time of ROS expression, the cellular site where they are generated, the enzymes that produce them, and the magnitude in which they are formed.  相似文献   

15.
VERNALIZATION INSENSITIVE 3 (VIN3) encodes a PHD domain chromatin remodelling protein that is induced in response to cold and is required for the establishment of the vernalization response in Arabidopsis thaliana.1 Vernalization is the acquisition of the competence to flower after exposure to prolonged low temperatures, which in Arabidopsis is associated with the epigenetic repression of the floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC).2,3 During vernalization VIN3 binds to the chromatin of the FLC locus,1 and interacts with conserved components of Polycomb-group Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2).4,5 This complex catalyses the tri-methylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3),4,6,7 a repressive chromatin mark that increases at the FLC locus as a result of vernalization.4,710 In our recent paper11 we found that VIN3 is also induced by hypoxic conditions, and as is the case with low temperatures, induction occurs in a quantitative manner. Our experiments indicated that VIN3 is required for the survival of Arabidopsis seedlings exposed to low oxygen conditions. We suggested that the function of VIN3 during low oxygen conditions is likely to involve the mediation of chromatin modifications at certain loci that help the survival of Arabidopsis in response to prolonged hypoxia. Here we discuss the implications of our observations and hypotheses in terms of epigenetic mechanisms controlling gene regulation in response to hypoxia.Key words: arabidopsis, VIN3, FLC, hypoxia, vernalization, chromatin remodelling, survival  相似文献   

16.
Increasing evidence has revealed that membrane trafficking is highly associated with cell wall metabolism. Factors involved in vesicle delivery, e.g., cytoskeleton and motor proteins, have showed regulatory effects on cell wall structure and components. However, little is known about the involvement of other trafficking components in distribution of cell wall-related compartments. Dynamins are important proteins functioning in membrane tubulation and vesiculation. Recently, we have reported characterization of the rice dynamin-related protein 2B (OsDRP2B). Mutation in OsDRP2B causes a significant reduction in cellulose content. Its association with the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and clathrin-coated vesicles and the reduced CESA4 abundance at the bc3 plasma membrane suggest that BC3/OsDRP2B is involved in the transport of essential elements for cellulose synthesis. Here, we provide additional evidence for BC3 subcellular localization via observing OsDRP2B-GFP in living root hairs of transgenic plants. Uronic acid and fractional composition analyses further confirm that the amount of arabinoxylan and other noncellulosic polysaccharides is increased in bc3. However, three putative xylan synthesis genes are downregulated in mutant plant revealed by real-time PCR analysis. These results imply that compartments delivered by OsDRP2B are specifically responsible for cellulose biosynthesis.Key words: OsDRP2B, cellulose biosynthesis, membrane trafficking, brittleness, ricePlant cell wall is an extracellular matrix enriched in polysaccharides. Except for cellulose that is produced at the plasma membrane by cellulose synthase (CESA) complexes, most of the cell wall products are assumed being synthesized inside cells, e.g., in the Golgi apparatus and secreted outside through complex membrane trafficking. Besides the cell wall-localized products, some proteins essential for cellulose biosynthesis need to be translocated onto the plasma membrane to facilitate cellulose formation.1,2 Intracellular trafficking is therefore a key level for regulating cell wall composition and architecture, which are highly dynamic during cellular development.3 This notion is substantiated by the fact that wall architecture within the same cell is heterogeneity, indicating the presence of cell wall specific deposition domains.4,5 For example, pectins are often located at the cell corners.3 Different de-esterified homogalacturonan (HG) are present along the growing pollen tubes or root hairs: tips have highly esterified HG; the de-esterified degree is increased after tips.6 Although it is believed that these specific patterns could be the result of the targeted secretion of polysaccharides,3 our knowledge about the polysaccharide secretion is still very few. Currently, in vivo viewing CESA-containing compartments and the movement inside living cells have provided direct evidence for the trafficking action of CESA compartments.2,7,8 The delivery and removal of CESA complexes to/from the plasma membrane are very complicated, which require the involvement of many components, such as cytoskeleton and syntaxins.7,9,10 Syntaxins, part of SNARE complexes, function as docking factor of cell wall-related compartments during cell plate formation.10 Dynamin and dynamin-related proteins (DRPs) are involved in diverse events of cellular membrane remodeling.11 It remains unknown about whether DRPs are responsible for CESA trafficking. Recently, we have reported that BC3, the rice DRP2B protein, plays a role in complex membrane trafficking and affects the biosynthesis of secondary walls. Here, we provide additional cellular and wall chemical data to confirm that BC3/OsDRP2B is specifically involved in the secondary cell wall cellulose synthesis.  相似文献   

17.
Cytosolic free Ca2+ mobilization induced by microbe/pathogen-asssociated molecular patterns (MAMPs/PAMPs) plays key roles in plant innate immunity. However, components involved in Ca2+ signaling pathways still remain to be identified and possible involvement of the CBL (calcineurin B-like proteins)-CIPK (CBL-interacting protein kinases) system in biotic defense signaling have yet to be clarified. Recently we identified two CIPKs, OsCIPK14 and OsCIPK15, which are rapidly induced by MAMPs, involved in various MAMP-induced immune responses including defense-related gene expression, phytoalexin biosynthesis and hypersensitive cell death. MAMP-induced production of reactive oxygen species as well as cell browning were also suppressed in OsCIPK14/15-RNAi transgenic cell lines. Possible molecular mechanisms and physiological functions of the CIPKs in plant innate immunity are discussed.Key words: PAMPs/MAMPs, calcium signaling, CBL-CIPK, hypersensitive cell death, reactive oxygen speciesCa2+ plays an essential role as an intracellular second messenger in plants as well as in animals. Several families of Ca2+ sensor proteins have been identified in higher plants, which decode spatiotemporal patterns of intracellular Ca2+ concentration.1,2 Calcineurin B-Like Proteins (CBLs) comprise a family of Ca2+ sensor proteins similar to both the regulatory β-subunit of calcineurin and neuronal Ca2+ sensors of animals.3,4 Unlike calcineurin B that regulates protein phosphatases, CBLs specifically target a family of protein kinases referred to as CIPKs (CBL-Interacting Protein Kinases).5 The CBL-CIPK system has been shown to be involved in a wide range of signaling pathways, including abiotic stress responses such as drought and salt, plant hormone responses and K+ channel regulation.6,7Following the recognition of pathogenic signals, plant cells initiate the activation of a widespread signal transduction network that trigger inducible defense responses, including the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), biosynthesis of phytoalexins, expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and reorganization of cytoskeletons and the vacuole,8 followed by a form of programmed cell death known as hypersensitive response (HR).9,10 Because complexed spatiotemporal patterns of cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]cyt) have been suggested to play pivotal roles in defense signaling,1,9 multiple Ca2+ sensor proteins and their effectors should function in defense signaling pathways. Although possible involvement of some calmodulin isoforms1113 and the calmodulin-domain/calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs)1419 has been suggested, other Ca2+-regulated signaling components still remain to be identified. No CBLs or CIPKs had so far been implicated as signaling components in innate immunity.  相似文献   

18.
19.
20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号