Strigolactones' ability to regulate root development may be executed by induction of the ethylene pathway

The newly defined phytohormones strigolactones (SLs) were recently shown to act as regulators of root development. Their positive effect on root-hair (RH) elongation enabled examination of their cross talk with auxin and ethylene. Analysis of wild-type plants and hormone-signaling mutants combined with hormonal treatments suggested that SLs and ethylene regulate RH elongation via a common regulatory pathway, in which ethylene is epistatic to SLs. The SL and auxin hormonal pathways were suggested to converge for regulation of RH elongation; this convergence was suggested to be mediated via the ethylene pathway, and to include regulation of auxin transport.Key words: strigolactone, auxin, ethylene, root, root hair, lateral rootStrigolactones (SLs) are newly identified phytohormones that act as long-distance shoot-branching inhibitors (reviewed in ref. ¹). In Arabidopsis, SLs have been shown to be regulators of root development and architecture, by modulating primary root elongation and lateral root formation.^2,3 In addition, they were shown to have a positive effect on root-hair (RH) elongation.² All of these effects are mediated via the MAX2 F-box.^2,3In addition to SLs, two other plant hormones, auxin and ethylene, have been shown to affect root development, including lateral root formation and RH elongation.^4–6 Since all three phytohormones (SLs, auxin and ethylene) were shown to have a positive effect on RH elongation, we examined the epistatic relations between them by examining RH length.⁷ Our results led to the conclusion that SLs and ethylene are in the same pathway regulating RH elongation, where ethylene may be epistatic to SLs.⁷ Moreover, auxin signaling was shown to be needed to some extent for the RH response to SLs: the auxin-insensitive mutant tir1-1,⁸ was less sensitive to SLs than the wild type under low SL concentrations.⁷On the one hand, ethylene has been shown to induce the auxin response,^9–12 auxin synthesis in the root apex,^11,12 and acropetal and basipetal auxin transport in the root.^4,13 On the other, ethylene has been shown to be epistatic to SLs in the SL-induced RH-elongation response.⁷ Therefore, it might be that at least for RH elongation, SLs are in direct cross talk with ethylene, whereas the cross talk between SL and auxin pathways may converge through that of ethylene.⁷ The reduced response to SLs in tir1-1 may be derived from its reduced ethylene sensitivity;^7,14 this is in line with the notion of the ethylene pathway being a mediator in the cross talk between the SL and auxin pathways.The suggested ethylene-mediated convergence of auxin and SLs may be extended also to lateral root formation, and may involve regulation of auxin transport. In the root, SLs have been suggested to affect auxin efflux,^3,15 whereas ethylene has been shown to have a positive effect on auxin transport.^4,13 Hence, it might be that in the root, the SLs'' effect on auxin flux is mediated, at least in part, via the ethylene pathway. Ethylene''s ability to increase auxin transport in roots was associated with its negative effect on lateral root formation: ethylene was suggested to enhance polar IAA transport, leading to alterations in the quantity of auxin that unloads into the tissues to drive lateral root formation.⁴ Under conditions of sufficient phosphate, SL''s effect was similar to that of ethylene: SLs reduced the appearance of lateral roots; this was explained by their ability to change auxin flux.³ Taken together, one possibility is that the SLs'' ability to affect auxin flux and thereby lateral root formation in the roots is mediated by induction of ethylene synthesis.To conclude, root development may be regulated by a network of auxin, SL and ethylene cross talk.⁷ The possibility that similar networks exist elsewhere in the SLs'' regulation of plant development, including shoot architecture, cannot be excluded.     

Auxin acts independently of DELLA proteins in regulating gibberellin levels

Shoot elongation is a vital process for plant development and productivity, in both ecological and economic contexts. Auxin and bioactive gibberellins (GAs), such as GA₁, play critical roles in the control of elongation,^1–3 along with environmental and endogenous factors, including other hormones such as the brassinosteroids.^4,5 The effect of auxins, such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), is at least in part mediated by its effect on GA metabolism,⁶ since auxin upregulates biosynthesis genes such as GA 3-oxidase and GA 20-oxidase and downregulates GA catabolism genes such as GA 2-oxidases, leading to elevated levels of bioactive GA₁.⁷ In our recent paper,¹ we have provided evidence that this action of IAA is largely independent of DELLA proteins, the negative regulators of GA action,^8,9 since the auxin effects are still present in the DELLA-deficient la cry-s genotype of pea. This was a crucial issue to resolve, since like auxin, the DELLAs also promote GA₁ synthesis and inhibit its deactivation. DELLAs are deactivated by GA, and thereby mediate a feedback system by which bioactive GA regulates its own level.¹⁰ However, our recent results,¹ in themselves, do not show the generality of the auxin-GA relationship across species and phylogenetic groups or across different tissue types and responses. Further, they do not touch on the ecological benefits of the auxin-GA interaction. These issues are discussed below as well as the need for the development of suitable experimental systems to allow this process to be examined.Key words: auxin, gibberellins, DELLA proteins, interactions, elongation     

Localized auxin biosynthesis and postembryonic root development in Arabidopsis

Auxin is a phytohormone essential for plant development. Due to the high redundancy in auxin biosynthesis, the role of auxin biosynthesis in embryogenesis and seedling development, vascular and flower development, shade avoidance and ethylene response were revealed only recently. We previously reported that a vitamin B₆ biosynthesis mutant pdx1 exhibits a short-root phenotype with reduced meristematic zone and short mature cells. By reciprocal grafting, we now have found that the pdx1 short root is caused by a root locally generated signal. The mutant root tips are defective in callus induction and have reduced DR5::GUS activity, but maintain relatively normal auxin response. Genetic analysis indicates that pdx1 mutant could suppress the root hair and root growth phenotypes of the auxin overproduction mutant yucca on medium supplemented with tryptophan (Trp), suggesting that the conversion from Trp to auxin is impaired in pdx1 roots. Here we present data showing that pdx1 mutant is more tolerant to 5-methyl anthranilate, an analogue of the Trp biosynthetic intermediate anthranilate, demonstrating that pdx1 is also defective in the conversion from anthranilate to auxin precursor tryptophan. Our data suggest that locally synthesized auxin may play an important role in the postembryonic root growth.Key words: auxin synthesis, root, PLP, PDX1The plant hormone auxin modulates many aspects of growth and development including cell division and cell expansion, leaf initiation, root development, embryo and fruit development, pattern formation, tropism, apical dominance and vascular tissue differentiation.^1–3 Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is the major naturally occurring auxin. IAA can be synthesized in cotyledons, leaves and roots, with young developing leaves having the highest capacity.^4,5Auxin most often acts in tissues or cells remote from its synthetic sites, and thus depends on non-polar phloem transport as well as a highly regulated intercellular polar transport system for its distribution.²The importance of local auxin biosynthesis in plant growth and development has been masked by observations that impaired long-distance auxin transport can result in severe growth or developmental defects.^3,6 Furthermore, a few mutants with reduced free IAA contents display phenotypes similar to those caused by impaired long-distance auxin transport. These phenotypes include defective vascular tissues and flower development, short primary roots and reduced apical dominance, or impaired shade avoidance and ethylene response.^7–15 Since these phenotypes most often could not be rescued by exogenous auxin application, it is difficult to attribute such defects to altered local auxin biosynthesis. By complementing double, triple or quadruple mutants of four Arabidopsis shoot-abundant auxin biosynthesis YUCCA genes with specific YUCCA promoters driven bacterial auxin biosynthesis iaaM gene, Cheng et al. provided unambiguous evidence that auxin biosynthesis is indispensable for embryo, flower and vascular tissue development.^8,13 Importantly, it is clear that auxin synthesized by YUCCAs is not functionally interchangeable among different organs, supporting the notion that auxin synthesized by YUCCAs mainly functions locally or in a short range.^6,8,13The central role of auxin in root meristem patterning and maintenance is well documented,^1,2,16 but the source of such IAA is still unclear. When ¹⁴C-labeled IAA was applied to the five-day-old pea apical bud, the radioactivity could be detected in lateral root primordia but not the apical region of primary roots.¹⁷ Moreover, removal of the shoot only slightly affected elongation of the primary root, and localized application of auxin polar transport inhibitor naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) at the primary root tip exerted more profound inhibitory effect on root elongation than at any other site.¹⁸ These results suggest that auxin generated near the root tip may play a more important role in primary root growth than that transported from the shoot. In line with this notion, Arabidopsis roots have been shown to harbor multiple auxin biosynthesis sites including root tips and the region upward from the tip.⁴Many steps of tryptophan synthesis and its conversion to auxin involve transamination reactions, which require the vitamin B₆ pyridoxal 5-phosphate (PLP) as a cofactor. We previously reported that the Arabidopsis mutant pdx1 that is defective in vitamin B₆ biosynthesis displays dramatically reduced primary root growth with smaller meristematic zone and shorter mature cortical cells.¹⁹ In the current investigation, we found that the root tips of pdx1 have reduced cell division capability and reduced DR5::GUS activity, although the induction of this reporter gene by exogenous auxin was not changed. Reciprocal grafting indicates that the short-root phenotype of pdx1 is caused by a root local rather than shoot generated factor(s). Importantly, pdx1 suppresses yucca mutant, an auxin overproducer, in root hair proliferation although it fails to suppress the hypocotyl elongation phenotype.²⁰ Our work thus demonstrated that pdx1 has impaired root local auxin biosynthesis from tryptophan. To test whether the synthesis of tryptophan is also affected in pdx1 mutant, we planted pdx1 together with wild-type seeds on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 5-mehtyl-anthranilate (5-MA), an analogue of the Trp biosynthetic intermediate anthranilate.²¹ Although pdx1 seedlings grew poorly under the control conditions, the growth of wild-type seedlings was more inhibited than that of the pdx1 seedlings on 10 µM 5-MA media (Fig. 1A–D). Compared with the elongated primary root on MS, wild-type seedlings showed very limited root growth on 5-MA (Fig. 1E). The relatively increased tolerance to 5-MA of pdx1 thus indicates that the pdx1 mutant may be defective in Trp biosynthesis, although amino acid analysis of the bulked seedlings did not find clear changes in Trp levels in the mutants (our unpublished data).Open in a separate windowFigure 1The pdx1 mutant seedlings are relatively less sensitive to toxic 5-methyl anthranilate (5-MA). (A and C) Five-day-old seedlings of the wild type (Col-0) (A) or pdx1 (C) on MS medium. (B and D) Five-day-old seedlings of the wild type (B) or pdx1 (D) on MS medium supplemented with 10 µM 5-MA. (E) Eight-day-old seedlings of the wild type or pdx1 on MS medium without or with 10 µM 5-MA supplement. Sterilized seeds were planted directly on the indicated medium and after two days of cold treatment, the plates were incubated under continuous light at 22–24°C before taking pictures.We reported that PDX1 is required for tolerance to oxidative stresses in Arabidopsis.¹⁹ Interestingly, redox homeostasis appears to play a critical role in Arabidopsis root development. The glutathione-deficient mutant root meristemless1 (rml1) and the vitamin C-deficient mutant vitamin C1 (vtc1) both have similar stunted roots.^22,23 Nonetheless, pdx1 is not rescued by either glutathione or vitamin C¹⁹ suggesting that the pdx1 short-root phenotype may not be resulted from a general reduction of antioxidative capacity. Interestingly, ascorbate oxidase is found to be highly expressed in the maize root quiescent center.²⁴ This enzyme can oxidatively decarboxylate auxin in vitro, suggesting that the quiescent center may be a site for metabolizing auxin to control its homeostasis.²⁵ It is therefore likely that the reduced auxin level in pdx1 root tips could be partially caused by increased auxin catabolism resulted from reduced vitamin B₆ level. We thus conducted experiments to test this possibility. A quiescent center-specific promoter WOX5 driven bacterial auxin biosynthetic gene iaaH²⁶ was introduced into pdx1 mutant. The transgenic seeds were planted on media supplemented with different concentrations of indoleacetamide (IAM), the substrate of iaaH protein. Although promotion of lateral root growth was observed at higher IAM concentrations, which indicates increased tryptophan-independent auxin production from the transgene, no change in root elongation was observed between pdx1 with or without the WOX5::iaaH transgene at any concentration of IAM tested (data not shown), suggesting that the pdx1 short-root phenotype may not be due to increased auxin catabolism.Taken together, in addition to auxin transport; temporally, spatially or developmentally coordinated local auxin biosynthesis defines the plant growth and its response to environmental changes.^8,14,15     

Irrepressible,truncated Auxin Response Factors: Natural roles and applications in dissecting auxin gene regulation pathways

The molecularly well-characterized auxin signal transduction pathway involves two evolutionarily conserved families interacting through their C-terminal domains III and IV: the Auxin Response Factors (ARFs) and their repressors the Aux/IAAs, to control auxin-responsive genes, among them genes involved in auxin transport.^1,2 We have developed a new genetic tool to study ARF function. Using MONOPTEROS (MP)/ARF5, we have generated a truncated version of MP (MPΔ),³ which has lost the target domains for repression by Aux/IAA proteins. Besides exploring genetic interactions between MP and Aux/IAAs, we used this construct to trace MP’s role in vascular patterning, a previously characterized auxin dependent process.^4,5 Here we summarize examples of naturally occurring truncated ARFs and summarize potential applications of truncated ARFs as analytical tools.     

Auxin perception and polar auxin transport are not always a prerequisite for differential growth

Using time-lapse photography, we studied the response kinetics of low light intensity-induced upward leaf-movement, called hyponastic growth, in Arabidopsis thaliana. This response is one of the traits of shade avoidance and directs plant organs to more favorable light conditions. Based on mutant- and pharmacological data we demonstrated that among other factors, functional auxin perception and polar auxin transport (PAT) are required for the amplitude of hyponastic growth and for maintenance of the high leaf angle, upon low light treatment. Here, we present additional data suggesting that auxin and PAT antagonize the hyponastic growth response induced by ethylene treatment. We conclude that ethylene- and low light-induced hyponastic growth occurs at least partly via separate signaling routes, despite their strong similarities in response kinetics.Key words: hyponastic growth, petiole, Arabidopsis, ethylene, low light, auxin, polar auxin transport, differential growthUpward leaf movement (hyponastic growth) is a trait of several plant species to escape from growth-limiting conditions.^1,2 Interestingly, Arabidopsis thaliana induces a marked hyponastic growth response triggered by various environmental stimuli, including complete submergence, high temperature, canopy shade and spectral neutral low light intensities (Fig. 1).^3–6 The paper of Millenaar et al. in the New Phytologist 2009,⁷ provides a detailed analysis of low light intensity-induced hyponastic growth and components of the signal transduction are characterized using time-lapse photography. Low light intensity-induced hyponastic growth is a component of the so-called shade avoidance syndrome. Light-spectrum manipulations and mutant analyses indicated that predominantly the blue light wavelength region affects petiole movement and fast induction of hyponastic growth to low light conditions involves the photoreceptor proteins Cryptochrome 1 (Cry1), Cry2, Phytochrome-A (PhyA) and PhyB. Moreover, we show that also photosynthesis-derived signals can induce differential growth.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Typical hyponastic growth phenotype of Arabidopsis thaliana. Side view of Columbia-0 plants treated 10 h with ethylene (5 µl l⁻¹) or low light (20 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹). Plants in control light conditions were in 200 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹. Both stimuli induce a clear leaf inclination (hyponasty) relative to the horizontal by differential growth of the petioles. Plants kept in control conditions only show modest diurnal leaf movement and leaf angles gradually decline over time due to maturation of the leaves. Note that the paint droplets were applied to facilitate quantitative measurement of leaf angle kinetics in a time-lapse camera setup.⁷The hyponastic growth response to low light intensity was not affected in several ethylene-insensitive mutant lines. Moreover, low light did not affect expression of ethylene inducible marker genes nor differences in ethylene release were noted. Therefore, we concluded that low light-induced hyponastic growth is independent of ethylene signaling. This is perhaps surprising, because ethylene is the main trigger of hyponastic growth induced by complete submergence in several species. Interestingly, both ethylene and low light can induce hyponastic growth in Arabidopsis with similar kinetics.³We showed that plants mutant in auxin perception components (transport inhibitor response1 (tir1) and tir1 afb1 afb2 afb3 quadruple, containing additional mutant alleles of TIR1 homologous F-box proteins) and plants mutant in (polar) auxin transport (tir3-1, pin-formed3 (pin3) and pin7) components had a lower hyponastic growth amplitude in low light conditions.⁷ Moreover, these mutants were less able to maintain the high leaf angles after the response maximum. Both characteristics were also noted in plants pre-treated with the polar auxin transport (PAT) inhibitor 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA). We therefore concluded that auxin perception and PAT are involved in the regulation of low light-induced hyponastic growth.⁷ Interestingly, we observed that TIBA pretreatment did not inhibit ethylene-induced hyponastic growth. In fact, the response upon ethylene treatment was even modestly enhanced. In agreement with this observation, we show here that the above mentioned auxin perception and PAT mutants also showed a slightly enhanced hyponastic growth response upon ethylene treatment (Fig. 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 2Auxin involvement in ethylene induced hyponasty. Effect of exposure to ethylene (5 µl l⁻¹) on the kinetics of hyponastic petiole growth (A) in Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia-0 plants treated with 50 µm TIBa (open circles) or a mock treatment (line) adapted from Supporting Information Figure S3 of Millenaar et al. (2009)⁷ and (B–F) in Arabidopsis auxin signaling and polar auxin transport mutants (closed circles), compared to the wild type response to low light (lines). Petiole angles are pair wise subtracted, which corrects for diurnal petiole movement in control conditions. For details on this procedure, growth conditions, treatments, data acquirement and analysis see.^7,13 Error bars represent standard errors; n ≥ 12. mutants were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Center (accession numbers are shown between brackets) or from the authors describing the lines. tir1-1 (n3798,¹⁴), tir1-1 afb1-1 afb2-1 (in a mixed Columbia/Wassilewskija background),¹⁵ tir3-1,¹⁴ pin3-4 (n9363,¹⁶) and pin7-1 (n9365,¹⁰).Despite that auxin and PAT are required for many differential growth responses such as phototropism and gravitropism,^8,11 these data indicate that auxin perception and PAT are not obligatory for ethylene-induced hyponasty in Arabidopsis per se. In fact, one might even conclude that auxin and PAT antagonizes ethylene-induced hyponasty. These results are partly in agreement with observations on the wetland species Rumex palustris, were pretreatment with the auxin-efflux carrier 1-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) resulted in doubling of the lag-phase for hyponastic growth under water, but hardly affected the amplitude of the response.¹²Together, this indicates that auxin is not always a prerequisite for differential growth responses. Based on the apparent contrasting effects of auxin perception and PAT in low light- and ethylene-induced hyponastic growth, we conclude that ethylene and low light induce hyponastic growth, at least partly, via separate signaling routes.     

Redox regulation of auxin signaling and plant development in Arabidopsis

Thioredoxin (NTR/TRX) and glutathione (GSH/GRX) are the two major systems that play a key role in the maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis. They are essential for plant development, cell division or the response to environmental stresses. In a recent article,¹ we studied the interplay between the NADP-linked thioredoxin and glutathione systems in auxin signaling genetically, by associating TRX reductase (ntra ntrb) and glutathione biosynthesis (cad2) mutations. We show that these two thiol reduction pathways interfere with developmental processes. This occurs through modulation of auxin activity as shown by genetic analyses of loss of function mutations in a triple ntra ntrb cad2 mutant. The triple mutant develops almost normally at the rosette stage but fails to generate lateral organs from the inflorescence meristem, producing almost naked stems that are reminiscent of mutants affected in PAT (polar auxin transport) or biosynthesis. The triple mutant exhibits other defects in processes regulated by auxin, including a loss of apical dominance, vasculature defects and reduced secondary root production. Furthermore, it has lower auxin (IAA) levels and decreased capacity for PAT, suggesting that the NTR and glutathione pathways influence inflorescence meristem development through regulation of auxin transport and metabolism.Key words: arabidopsis, NTS pathway, NGS pathway, thioredoxin (TRX), glutaredoxine (GRX), polar auxin transport (PAT), auxin biosynthesis, pin-like phenotype, apical dominance, meristematic activityExposure of living organisms to environmental stresses triggers various defense and developmental responses. Redox signaling is involved in many aspects of these responses.^2–6 The key players in these responses are the NADPH-dependent glutathione/glutaredoxin system (NGS) and the NADPH-dependent thioredoxin system (NTS). TRX and GRX play key roles in the maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis.^7–10 Genetic approaches aiming to identify functions of TRX and GRX in knock-out plants have largely been limited by the absence of phenotypes of single mutants, presumably due to functional redundancies among members of the multigene families of TRX and GRX.¹¹ Interplay between NTS and NGS pathways have been studied in different organisms^12–17 and association of mutants involved in these two pathways have recently revealed new functions in several aspects of plant development.^4–6     

ARF-GTPase as a Molecular Switch for Polar Auxin Transport Mediated by Vesicle Trafficking in Root Development

Polar auxin transport (PAT), which is controlled precisely by both auxin efflux and influx facilitators and mediated by the cell trafficking system, modulates organogenesis, development and root gravitropism. ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF)-GTPase protein is catalyzed to switch to the GTP-bound type by a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and promoted for hybridization to the GDP-bound type by a GTPase-activating protein (GAP). Previous studies showed that auxin efflux facilitators such as PIN1 are regulated by GNOM, an ARF-GEF, in Arabidopsis. In the November issue of The Plant Journal, we reported that the auxin influx facilitator AUX1 was regulated by ARF-GAP via the vesicle trafficking system.¹ In this addendum, we report that overexpression of OsAGAP leads to enhanced root gravitropism and propose a new model of PAT regulation: a loop mechanism between ARF-GAP and GEF mediated by vesicle trafficking to regulate PAT at influx and efflux facilitators, thus controlling root development in plants.Key Words: ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF), ARF-GAP, ARF-GEF, auxin, GNOM, polar transport of auxinPolar auxin transport (PAT) is a unique process in plants. It results in alteration of auxin level, which controls organogenesis and development and a series of physiological processes, such as vascular differentiation, apical dominance, and tropic growth.² Genetic and physiological studies identified that PAT depends on efflux facilitators such as PIN family proteins and influx facilitators such as AUX1 in Arabidopsis.Eight PIN family proteins, AtPIN1 to AtPIN8, exist in Arabidopsis. AtPIN1 is located at the basal side of the plasma membrane in vascular tissues but is weak in cortical tissues, which supports the hypothesis of chemical pervasion.³ AtPIN2 is localized at the apical side of epidermal cells and basally in cortical cells.^1,4 GNOM, an ARF GEF, modulates the localization of PIN1 and vesicle trafficking and affects root development.^5,6 The PIN auxin-efflux facilitator network controls root growth and patterning in Arabidopsis.⁴ As well, asymmetric localization of AUX1 occurs in the root cells of Arabidopsis plants,⁷ and overexpression of OsAGAP interferes with localization of AUX1.¹ Our data support that ARF-GAP mediates auxin influx and auxin-dependent root growth and patterning, which involves vesicle trafficking.¹ Here we show that OsAGAP overexpression leads to enhanced gravitropic response in transgenic rice plants. We propose a model whereby ARF GTPase is a molecular switch to control PAT and root growth and development.Overexpression of OsAGAP led to reduced growth in primary or adventitious roots of rice as compared with wild-type rice.¹ Gravitropism assay revealed transgenic rice overxpressing OsAGAP with a faster response to gravity than the wild type during 24-h treatment. However, 1-naphthyl acetic acid (NAA) treatment promoted the gravitropic response of the wild type, with no difference in response between the OsAGAP transgenic plants and the wild type plants (Fig. 1). The phenotype of enhanced gravitropic response in the transgenic plants was similar to that in the mutants atmdr1-100 and atmdr1-100/atpgp1-100 related to Arabidopsis ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporter and defective in PAT.⁸ The physiological data, as well as data on localization of auxin transport facilitators, support ARF-GAP modulating PAT via regulating the location of the auxin influx facilitator AUX1.¹ So the alteration in gravitropic response in the OsAGAP transgenic plants was explained by a defect in PAT.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Gravitropism of OsAGAP overexpressing transgenic rice roots and response to 1-naphthyl acetic acid (NAA). (A) Gravitropism phenotype of wild type (WT) and OsAGAP overexpressing roots at 6 hr gravi-stimulation (top panel) and 0 hr as a treatment control (bottom panel). (B) Time course of gravitropic response in transgenic roots. (C and D) results correspond to those in (A and B), except for treatment with NAA (5 × 10⁻⁷ M).The polarity of auxin transport is controlled by the asymmetric distribution of auxin transport proteins, efflux facilitators and influx carriers. ARF GTPase is a key member in vesicle trafficking system and modulates cell polarity and PAT in plants. Thus, ARF-GDP or GTP bound with GEF or GAP determines the ARF function on auxin efflux facilitators (such as PIN1) or influx ones (such as AUX1).ARF1, targeting ROP2 and PIN2, affects epidermal cell polarity.⁹ GNOM is involved in the regulation of PIN1 asymmetric localization in cells and its related function in organogenesis and development.⁶ Although VAN3, an ARF-GAP in Arabidopsis, is located in a subpopulation of the trans-Golgi transport network (TGN), which is involved in leaf vascular network formation, it does not affect PAT.¹⁰ OsAGAP possesses an ARF GTPase-activating function in rice.¹¹ Specifically, our evidence supports that ARF-GAP bound with ARF-GTP modulates PAT and gravitropism via AUX1, mediated by vesicle trafficking, including the Golgi stack.¹Therefore, we propose a loop mechanism between ARF-GAP and GEF mediated by the vascular trafficking system in regulating PAT at influx and efflux facilitators, which controls root development and gravitropism in plants (Fig. 2). Here we emphasize that ARF-GEF catalyzes a conversion of ARF-bound GDP to GTP, which is necessary for the efficient delivery of the vesicle to the target membrane.¹² An opposite process of ARF-bound GDP to GTP is promoted by ARF-GTPase-activating protein via binding. A loop status of ARF-GTP and ARF-GDP bound with their appurtenances controls different auxin facilitators and regulates root development and gravitropism.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Model for ARF GTPase as a molecular switch for the polar auxin transport mediated by the vesicle traffic system.     

Growing in darkness: The etiolated lupin hypocotyls

Epigeal germination of a dicot, like lupin (Lupinus albus L.), produces a seedling with a characteristic hypocotyl, which grows in darkness showing a steep growth gradient with an elongation zone just below the apex. The role of phytohormones, such as auxin and ethylene, in etiolated hypocotyl growth has been the object of our research for some time. The recent cloning and expression of three genes of influx and efflux carriers for polar auxin transport (LaAUX1, LaPIN1 and LaPIN3) reinforces a previous model proposed to explain the accumulation of auxin in the upper growth zone of the hypocotyl.Key words: auxin carriers, auxin transport gradient, etiolated hypocotyl growth, Lupinus albusMost plants show a typical axial polar and branched (dendritic) morphology to compensate for their immobility by optimally exploiting the resources available in a limited environment.From Julius von Sachs¹ to Tsvi Sachs² many plant physiologists sought to explain how the axis is maintained and what type of signals are interchanged between poles. It was demonstrated that auxins were the determining factors in maintaining the polarity in shoots and roots and a reductionistic approach leads to conclude that such polarity had to be established at the cellular level. A chemiosmotic theory was then proposed, which implied an asymmetric distribution of efflux carriers at the bottom of a cell, linked to pH gradients to maintain different undissociated/dissociated forms of auxin separated between apoplast and symplast spaces.³In recent years, the use of Arabidopsis thaliana as a plant model has given additional support to the hypothesis that polar auxin transport is restricted to certain cells and mediated by influx (AUX1 and LAX1–4 proteins) and efflux carriers (PIN1–8 proteins).^4–6 Currently, we have a good idea of the topology of Arabidopsis carrier distribution, especially in roots.^4,5 Additional (MDR/PGP)⁷ or parallel (TRH1)⁸ components of the transport system are now emerging.However, while accepting the enormous advances and contributions to plant science provided by the use of Arabidopsis thaliana, we remain true (loyal) to the particular model adopted by the Department of Plant Biology, University of Murcia (Spain) in the 1970''s: the hypocotyl of lupin seedlings cultivated in darkness. In such conditions, the organ grows heterotrophically and longer than in light.The cotyledons and meristem at the top supply nutrients and hormones in a basipetal direction.The hypocotyl is a cylindrical column, with a radial symmetry that clearly shows differentiated tissues: epidermis, cortex, vascular cylinder and pith. Its size allows surgical separation of the tissues using suitable glass capillaries.At the beginning lupin was chosen because it had higher IAA-oxidase activity than pea, bean, oat or barley seedlings. At the time, it was thought that growth was mainly controlled through auxin catabolism (a fruitful line involving peroxidases was developed later). However, the etiolated hypocotyl was soon adopted preferentially by our group because of its qualities as a model for studying the relationship between hormone levels (auxin and ethylene) and growth. Our Portuguese colleagues have also used lupin as a model with successful results.⁹Bellow, we detail the landmarks of our research to date. Hypocotyl growth shows a characteristic pattern. Unlike plants grown in the light, in which all the cells along the hypocotyl elongate continuously throughout the growth period,^10,11 there is a steep growth gradient in the dark with an elongation zone just below the apex¹² (see Fig. 1 for details). This cell growth pattern in etiolated hypocotyls was described in lupin and then in Arabidopsis.¹¹ In this pattern, it is important to note that there is compensation along the organ between the cell diameter and the cell wall thickness. Once the cell growth pattern was known, we investigated its relation with the level of two phytohormones, auxin and ethylene, which might participate in the growth regulation. Special attention was paid to the distribution of endogenous IAA and its relation with growth. The results showed good correlation between the auxin levels and the cell size.^13,14 Auxin from the apex appears to be responsible for hypocotyl growth, since decapitation of seedlings strongly reduced growth, which was restored after the application of exogenous IAA to the cut surface.¹⁵ In light of the fact that growth depended on auxin from the apex, we investigated the nature of the auxin transport and demonstrated that this transport is polarized and sensitive to inhibition by specific inhibitors of polar auxin transport (PAT) such as 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid and 1-N-naphthylphtalamic acid (NPA).^16,17 Basipetal PAT mainly occurred in the stele,¹⁵ while cells in the epidermis and outer cortex are the limiting factor in auxin-induced shoot growth.^18–20 The finding that during PAT auxin can move laterally from transporting cells in the stele to the outer tissues of the elongation zone¹⁵ could explain the apparent conflict between the localization of PAT and the auxin target cells for elongation. In fact, epidermal cells acted as a sink for lateral auxin movement (LAM).¹⁷Open in a separate windowFigure 1Distribution of growth and cell size along the hypocotyl in etiolated lupin seedlings. At 3 d, hypocotyls were marked with ink, delimiting four 5-mm long zones including the apical, middle and basal zones. The hypocotyl growth ceased at day 12 and almost no growth was observed in the basal zone after day 3. From 3 to 6 d the growth was localized between the apical and basal zones, while most growth occurring from 6 to 12 d was localized in apical and middle zones. The cell size represents the cell length and cell diameter (the cell wall excluded) and corresponds to the second cell layer of cortex near the vascular cylinder. Similar results were obtained in cells from epidermis and pith. In each zone the cell length increased and the cell diameter showed little change during hypocotyl ageing. The final size at the end of the growth period varied along the hypocotyl, the cells becoming shorter and broader from the apical to the basal zones. In spite of the fact that cell diameter increased basipetally, no significant variation in hypocotyl diameter was found along the organ during the growth period. A morphometric study revealed that cell wall thickness in the apical cells was twice that in the basal cells at the end of the growth period i.e., the thinner apical cells had thicker cell walls, which may help explain the consistency of hypocotyl diameter along the organ.If PAT provides the auxin for growth and elongating growth is restricted to the apical region in etiolated hypocotyls, the question is: how does auxin accumulate in the elongation region?In a former study, we proposed that variations in auxin transport along actively growing lupin hypocotyl could produce such accumulation.²¹ Recently we extensively studied the variation of PAT along the lupin hypocotyls in seedlings of different ages, finding that certain parameters of PAT, such as transport intensity, polarity (basipetal vs acropetal) and sensitivity to NPA inhibition, showed a good correlation with the distribution of growth along the hypocotyl and its variation with ageing.²² These results suggest that a basipetally decreasing gradient in PAT along the hypocotyl may be responsible for the auxin distribution pattern controlling growth, since the existence of such a PAT gradient might generate the so-called barrier effect, which could produce an auxin gradient along the hypocotyl, the auxin content being higher in the apical elongation zone. To investigate whether these PAT variations can be explained in terms of auxin carrier distribution, we isolated three genes coding for auxin influx (LaAUX1) and efflux (LaPIN1 and LaPIN3) carriers, and studied their expression in different tissues along the hypocotyl at different ages.²³ The expression of LaAUX1 and LaPIN3 occurred both in the stele and in the outer tissues, while the expression of LaPIN1 was restricted to the stele and showed a basipetally decreasing gradient along the hypocotyl. The decisive role ascribed to PIN1 in polar auxin transport due to its localization in the basal end of transporting cells,²⁴ and the existence of such a gradient in the expression of LaPIN1 support the hypothesis of a barrier effect (generated by decreasing auxin transport) previously proposed as being responsible for the auxin gradient which controls the growth pattern in etiolated lupin hypocotyls.The acid-growth theory of auxin action was also tested, observing that the elongation growth of etiolated hypocotyl segments of lupin was stimulated by acid pH and IAA. Both factors stimulated growth in a more than additive way, suggesting a synergistic action between them.²⁵ The recent finding of a soluble auxin receptor (intracellular) reinforces the interest of the above study (which has remained a “sleeping beauty”) because pH affects IAA uptake.There are still several questions that must be answered before we can fully understand the growth pattern exhibited by etiolated lupin hypocotyls. Thus, as regards the cause of the PAT gradient, other factors besides the LaPIN1 gradient must be considered. For example, auxin carriers such as some phosphoglycoproteins (PGP), are also expressed differentially along the Arabidopsis hypocotyl and specific PIN-PGP pairings influence PAT by modulating the rates of cellular auxin movement.⁷ The pathway (symplast or apoplast) and mechanism of LAM remains unknown. Although alternative mechanisms have been proposed,²⁶ a previous study in lupin¹⁵ suggested that LAM is a diffusive process and that the IAA metabolism observed in the outer tissues might generate the radial gradient of auxin necessary for the maintenance of its lateral flow. It is thought that this metabolism of IAA occurs once the hormonal action is completed.^25,27 Although NPA does not inhibit LAM, the involvement of auxin efflux carriers cannot be discarded. In fact, the role of PIN carriers in lateral auxin transport towards and from the stele has been described in the root.²⁸ Other phytohormones besides auxin can modulate hypocotyl growth. Thus, the ethylene production rate, the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) content and the ACC oxidase activity decreased along the hypocotyl during the hypocotyl growth period.²⁹ Sensitivity to exogenous ethylene varied during growth, the young apical region being less sensitive than the older basal region.³⁰ Ethylene modified the cell growth pattern in the different tissues.³¹ The ethylene-induced lupin hypocotyl thickening was irreversible and mainly due to an increase in cell diameter. However, the inhibition of hypocotyl elongation produced by ethylene was reversible and involved irreversible inhibition of cell division and, paradoxically, stimulation of cell elongation to produce cells longer than those of the control.³²Studies in Arabidopsis showed that the hypocotyl growth in both light- and dark-grown plants is a process driven by cross-talk between multiple hormones. Interactions between auxins, ethylene, gibberellins and brassinosteroids have been described.^33,34 We think that the etiolated lupin hypocotyl remains a suitable model for confirming some of these results and for opening up new approaches in phytohormone research.     

Auxin distribution and lenticel formation in determinate nodule of Lotus japonicus

Legumes can establish a symbiosis with rhizobia and form root nodules that function as an apparatus for nitrogen fixation. Nodule development is regulated by several phytohormones including auxin. Although accumulation of auxin is necessary to initiate the nodulation of indeterminate nodules, the functions of auxin on the nodulation of determinate nodules have been less characterized. In this study, the functions of auxin in nodule development in Lotus japonicus have been demonstrated using an auxin responsive promoter and auxin inhibitors. We found that the lenticel formation on the nodule surface was sensitive to the auxin defect. Further analysis indicated that failure in the development of the vascular bundle of the determinate nodule, which was regulated by auxin, was the cause of the disappearance of lenticels.Key words: auxin, lenticel, Lotus japonicus, nodulation, symbiotic nitrogen fixationLegumes (Fabaceae) constitute the third largest plant family with around 700 genera and 20,000 species.¹ Legume plants form root nodules through symbiosis with a soil microbe called rhizobia. This plant-microbe symbiosis in nodules mediates an harmonized exchange of chemical signals between host plants and rhizobia.² Nodules are biologically divided into two different groups, i.e., indeterminate nodules and determinate nodules. Indeterminate nodules, represented by Trifolium repens (white clover) and Medicago truncatula, are initiated from the inner cortex to form a persistent nodule meristem, which allows continuous growth, and leads to the formation of elongated nodules, whereas in determinate legumes, nodules are mostly developed from outer cortical cells and form spherical nodules.³Auxin is one of the most important regulators for nodule development. Since the possible involvement of auxin in nodule formation was first reported by Thimann,⁴ auxin distribution during nodulation has been studied in particular with indeterminate nodules.⁵ However, little is known about auxin involvement in determinate nodule formation. To evaluate auxin functions in the determinate nodulation of legume plants, we performed an auxin-responsive promoter analysis in detail. Using GH3:GUS transformed Lotus japonicus (a kind gift from Dr. Herman P. Spaink, Leiden State University, Netherlands),⁶ we detected auxin signals throughout the nodulation process, e.g., at the basal and front part of the nodule primordia, circumjacent to the infection zone of the young developing nodules (Fig. 1), and at the nodule vascular bundle in mature nodules. We also investigated the effect of several auxin inhibitors, including newly synthesized auxin antagonist PEO-IAA (kindly provided by Dr. Hayashi, Okayama University of Science, Japan),⁷ on the nodulation of L. japonicus, and revealed that auxin was required for forming a nodule vascular bundle and lenticels (Fig. 2).⁸Open in a separate windowFigure 1GH3:GUS expression in determinate nodule at 6 dpi. (A) GUS staining was observed in the central cylinder of the root vascular bundle and in the nodule. (B) Cross section of (A). GUS expression was observed around the infection zone of the nodule. Bars = 100 µm.Open in a separate windowFigure 2The effect of auxin inhibitor on nodule surface. (A) Typical mature nodule of L. japonicus at 21 dpi. Lenticels are pointed out by yellow arrowheads. (B) The treatment of auxin inhibitor (NPA 100 µM) inhibited lenticel formation on the nodule surface. Bars = 500 µm.In indeterminate legumes, auxin is accumulated at the site of rhizobia inoculation.⁹ This is caused by the inhibition of polar auxin transport by accumulation of flavonoids around the infection site, which are known as regulators of auxin transport. When flavonoid biosynthesis is reduced by the gene silencing of chalcone synthase, which catalyzes the first step of flavonoid synthesis, M. truncatula was unable to inhibit polar auxin transport and resulted in reduced nodule number.^10,11 A similar phenotype was observed when the auxin transporter gene was silenced.¹² In addition, treatment of polar auxin transport inhibitors such as NPA and TIBA induce pseudonodule formation,⁹ suggesting that auxin accumulation is required for nodulation of indeterminate legumes. In contrast, the treatment of polar auxin transport inhibitors in determinate nodules did not induce a nodule-like structure, suggesting a different function of auxin between indeterminate and determinate nodules. It is, however, of interest to investigate the involvement of flavonoids in determinate nodule formation, because several genes in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway are upregulated at 2 dpi (days post inoculation) in L. japonicus.¹³Lenticels regulate gas permeability of nodules.¹⁴ Under low oxygen or water-logged conditions, they develop more extensively, whereas they collapse, or develop very little during insufficient water conditions, or under high oxygen pressure.^14,15 Because lenticel development on the nodule surface is accompanied with the nodule vascular bundle, growth regulators supplied from the vascular system likely facilitate lenticel development.¹⁵ Our data suggests that auxin is necessary to form the nodule vascular bundle, and in fact, auxin itself is one of the candidates of growth substances that control lenticel formation. It is necessary to analyze mutants, which lack in lenticel formation, but can form a nodule vascular bundle, for clarification of further mechanisms of lenticel development.     

Arabidopsis FAB1A/B is possibly involved in the recycling of auxin transporters

Fab1/PIKfyve produces Phosphatidylinositol-3,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns (3,5) P₂) from Phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PtdIns 3-P), and is involved not only in vacuole/lysosome homeostasis, but also in transporting various proteins to the vacuole or recycling proteins on the plasma membrane (PM) through the use of endosomes in a variety of eukaryotic cells. We previously demonstrated that Arabidopsis FAB1A/B functions as PtdIns-3,5-kinase in both Arabidopsis and fission yeast and plays a key role in vacuolar acidification and endocytosis. Although the conditional FAB1A/B knockdown mutant revealed an auxin-resistant phenotype to a membrane-impermeable auxin, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), the mutant did not exhibit this phenotype to a membrane-permeable artificial auxin, naphthalene 1-acetic acid (NAA). The difference in the sensitivities to 2,4-D and NAA is similar to those of the auxin-resistant mutants such as aux1. Taken together, these results suggest that impairment of the function of Arabidopsis FAB1A/B might cause a defect in the membrane recycling capabilities of the auxin transporters and inhibit proper auxin transport into the cells in Arabidopsis.Key words: auxin signaling, auxin transporter, recycling of plasma membrane proteinsPhosphatidylinositol-3,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns (3,5) P₂) exists on the external membrane of multi-vesicular bodies (MVBs) at very low levels in eukaryotic cells,^1,2 and plays key roles in endomembrane homeostasis including endocytosis, vacuole/lysosome formation and vacuolar acidification.^1,3 PtdIns (3,5) P₂ deficiency causes an enlarged vacuolar structure in yeast and mammalian cells.^4,5 FAB1 forms a protein complex with its regulatory molecules, and synthesizes PtdIns (3,5) P₂ from PtdIns 3P.^6–9 In Arabidopsis, there are four Fab1/PIKfyve orthologs (FAB1A, FAB1B, FAB1C and FAB1D) in the genome, and the double homozygous mutant of FAB1A and FAB1B exhibited the male gametophyte lethal phenotype.¹⁰ Previously, we reported that conditional loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutants of FAB1A/B impair endomembrane homeostasis and reveal various developmental phenotypes.¹¹ Interestingly, lateral root formation by exogenous auxin, which is known as a typical auxin-responsive phenotype, was largely impaired when FAB1A/B expression was conditionally downregulated or upregulated. From these results, we speculated that the defect in the endocytosis process in fab1a/b mutants might inhibit the precise recycling process of auxin transporters on the PM, thereby inhibiting proper auxin transport into the plant cells.¹¹ In this report, we tested this hypothesis to assess the sensitivity on auxin-dependent lateral root formation to a membrane permeable auxin, NAA, in the fab1a/b knockdown mutant.