Tyloses and Phenolic Deposits in Xylem Vessels Impede Water Transport in Low-Lignin Transgenic Poplars: A Study by Cryo-Fluorescence Microscopy

Of 14 transgenic poplar genotypes (Populus tremula × Populus alba) with antisense 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase that were grown in the field for 2 years, five that had substantial lignin reductions also had greatly reduced xylem-specific conductivity compared with that of control trees and those transgenic events with small reductions in lignin. For the two events with the lowest xylem lignin contents (greater than 40% reduction), we used light microscopy methods and acid fuchsin dye ascent studies to clarify what caused their reduced transport efficiency. A novel protocol involving dye stabilization and cryo-fluorescence microscopy enabled us to visualize the dye at the cellular level and to identify water-conducting pathways in the xylem. Cryo-fixed branch segments were planed in the frozen state on a sliding cryo-microtome and observed with an epifluorescence microscope equipped with a cryo-stage. We could then distinguish clearly between phenolic-occluded vessels, conductive (stain-filled) vessels, and nonconductive (water- or gas-filled) vessels. Low-lignin trees contained areas of nonconductive, brown xylem with patches of collapsed cells and patches of noncollapsed cells filled with phenolics. In contrast, phenolics and nonconductive vessels were rarely observed in normal colored wood of the low-lignin events. The results of cryo-fluorescence light microscopy were supported by observations with a confocal microscope after freeze drying of cryo-planed samples. Moreover, after extraction of the phenolics, confocal microscopy revealed that many of the vessels in the nonconductive xylem were blocked with tyloses. We conclude that reduced transport efficiency of the transgenic low-lignin xylem was largely caused by blockages from tyloses and phenolic deposits within vessels rather than by xylem collapse.Secondary xylem in woody plants is a complex vascular tissue that functions in mechanical support, conduction, storage, and protection (Carlquist, 2001; Tyree and Zimmermann, 2002). The xylem must provide a sufficient and safe water supply throughout the entire pathway from roots to leaves for transpiration and photosynthesis. It is well established that enhanced water conductivity of xylem can increase total plant carbon gain (Domec and Gartner, 2003; Santiago et al., 2004; Brodribb and Holbrook, 2005a). According to the Hagen-Poiseuille equation, xylem conductivity should scale with vessel lumen diameter to the fourth power (Tyree and Zimmermann, 2002). Indeed, xylem conductivity largely depends on anatomical features, including conduit diameters and frequencies (Salleo et al., 1985; McCulloh and Sperry, 2005). However, there are hydraulic limits to maximum vessel diameters, because xylem conduits have to withstand the strong negative pressures of the transpiration stream that could cause cell collapse or embolisms within vessels that are structurally inadequate to withstand these forces (Tyree and Sperry, 1989; Lo Gullo et al., 1995; Hacke et al., 2000). To some extent, stomatal regulation of transpiration limits the negative pressures that the xylem experiences (Tardieu and Davies, 1993; Cochard et al., 2002; Meinzer, 2002; Brodribb and Holbrook, 2004; Buckley, 2005; Franks et al., 2007; Woodruff et al., 2007). Nevertheless, plants rely on an array of structural reinforcements of xylem to ensure the safety of water transport. The size of xylem elements, vessel redundancy, intervessel pit and membrane geometries, and the thickness, microstructure, and chemical composition of cell walls are among the features that regulate tradeoffs between efficiency and safety of xylem water transport (Baas and Schweingruber, 1987; Hacke et al., 2001; Domec et al., 2006; Ewers et al., 2007; Choat et al., 2008).The xylem cell wall is made up of cellulose bundles that are hydrogen bonded with hemicelluloses, which are in turn embedded within a lignin matrix (Mansfield, 2009; Salmén and Burgert, 2009). Besides providing this matrix for the cell wall itself, lignin is thought to contribute to many of the mechanical and physical characteristics of wood as well as conferring passive resistance to the spread of pathogens within a plant (Niklas, 1992; Boyce et al., 2004; Davin et al., 2008). Lignin typically represents 20% to 30% of the dry mass of wood and therefore is among the most abundant stores of carbon in the biosphere (Zobel and van Buijtenen, 1989). The complex molecular structure and biosynthetic pathway of various types of lignins have been studied extensively (Boerjan et al., 2003; Ralph et al., 2004, 2007; Higuchi, 2006; Boudet, 2007; Davin et al., 2008). The monomeric composition of lignin varies between different cell types of the same species depending on the functional specialization of the cell (Yoshinaga et al., 1992; Watanabe et al., 2004; Xu et al., 2006). The composition and amount of lignin in wild plants varies in response to climatic conditions (Donaldson, 2002) or gravitational and mechanical demands (Pruyn et al., 2000; Kern et al., 2005; Rüggeberg et al., 2008). It is clear that plants are capable of regulating the lignification pattern in differentiating cells, which provides them with flexibility for responding to environmental stresses (Donaldson, 2002; Koehler and Telewski, 2006; Ralph et al., 2007; for review, see Vanholme et al., 2008).Whereas some level of lignin is a requisite for all vascular plants, it is often an unwanted product in the pulp and paper industry because it increases the costs of paper production and associated water treatments necessary for environmental protection (Chen et al., 2001; Baucher et al., 2003; Peter et al., 2007). Reducing the lignin content of the raw biomass material may allow more efficient hydrolysis of polysaccharides in biomass and thus facilitate the production of biofuel (Chen and Dixon, 2007). With the ultimate goal of development of wood for more efficient processing, much research has been aimed at the production of genetically modified trees with altered lignin biosynthesis (Boerjan et al., 2003; Boudet et al., 2003; Li et al., 2003; Halpin, 2004; Ralph et al., 2004, 2008; Chiang, 2006; Coleman et al., 2008a, 2008b; Vanholme et al., 2008; Wagner et al., 2009). It is now technically possible to achieve more than 50% reductions of lignin content in xylem of poplar (Populus spp.; Leplé et al., 2007; Coleman et al., 2008a, 2008b), but the consequences of such reduction on plant function have received relatively little attention (Koehler and Telewski, 2006). In-depth studies on the xylem structure and functional performance of transgenic plants with low lignin are limited, despite the need to assess their long-term sustainability for large-scale production (Anterola and Lewis, 2002; Hancock et al., 2007; Coleman et al., 2008b, Voelker, 2009; Horvath et al., 2010).Genetically modified plants are suitable models for studying fundamental questions of the physiological role of lignin because of the possibility of controlling lignification without the confounding effects encountered when comparing across plant tissues or stages of development (Koehler and Telewski, 2006; Leplé et al., 2007; Coleman et al., 2008b). Research on Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) has shown that down-regulation of lignin biosynthesis can have diverse effects on plant metabolism and structure, including changes in the lignin amount and composition (p-hydroxyphenyl/guaiacyl/syringyl units ratio) as well as the collapse of xylem vessel elements (Lee et al., 1997; Sewalt et al., 1997; Piquemal et al., 1998; Chabannes et al., 2001; Jones et al., 2001; Franke et al., 2002; Dauwe et al., 2007). Among temperate hardwoods, poplar has been established as a model tree for genetic manipulations because of its ecological and economic importance, fast growth, ease of vegetative propagation, and its widespread use in traditional breeding programs (Bradshaw et al., 2001; Brunner et al., 2004). The question of how manipulation of lignin can affect the anatomy and physiological function of xylem in poplar has been addressed in part by several research groups (Anterola and Lewis, 2002; Boerjan et al., 2003; Leplé et al., 2007; Coleman et al., 2008b). Some studies that involved large lignin reductions reported no significant alterations in the xylem anatomy (Hu et al., 1999; Li et al., 2003). However, in many other experiments, reduced total lignin content was associated with significant growth retardation, alterations in the lignin monomer composition, irregularities in the xylem structure (Anterola and Lewis, 2002; Leplé et al., 2007; Coleman et al., 2008b), and the patchy occurrence of collapsed xylem cells (Coleman et al., 2008b; Voelker, 2009). Furthermore, severely down-regulated lignin biosynthesis has resulted in greatly reduced xylem water-transport efficiency (Coleman et al., 2008b; Lachenbruch et al., 2009; Voelker, 2009). It is generally assumed that the reduced water transport ability of xylem with very low lignin contents is caused by collapsed conduits and/or increased embolism due to the entry of air bubbles into the water-conducting cells (Coleman et al., 2008b; Wagner et al., 2009), but detailed anatomical investigations of the causes of impaired xylem conductivity of low-lignin trees are lacking. Analysis of the anatomical basis for the properties of xylem conduits in plants with genetically manipulated amounts and composition of lignin can provide a deeper understanding of the physiological role of lignin as well as the lower limit of down-regulation of lignin biosynthesis at which trees can still survive within natural environments.One of the approaches for the suppression of lignin biosynthesis is down-regulation of 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase (4CL), an enzyme that functions in phenylpropanoid metabolism by producing the monolignol precursor p-coumaroyl-CoA (Kajita et al.,1997; Allina et al., 1998; Hu et al., 1998; Harding et al., 2002; Jia et al., 2004; Costa et al., 2005; Friedmann et al., 2007; Wagner et al., 2009). In a 2-year-long field trial on the physiological performance of poplar (Populus tremula × Populus alba) transgenic clones, out of 14 genotypes with altered lignin biosynthesis (down-regulated 4CL), five showed dramatically reduced wood-specific conductivity (k_s) compared with that of control trees (Voelker, 2009). Those mutants with the severely reduced k_s were also characterized by having the lowest wood lignin contents (up to an approximately 40% reduction) in the study. Trees with transgenic events characterized by the formation of abnormally brown wood exhibited regular branch dieback at the end of the growing season, despite having been regularly watered (Voelker, 2009). Our objective was to identify the structural features responsible for reduced transport efficiency in the xylem of transgenic poplars with extremely low lignin contents. We employed fluorescence and laser scanning confocal microscopy for anatomical analyses of xylem structure as well as dye-flow experiments followed by cryo-fluorescence microscopy to visualize the functioning water-conductive pathways in xylem at the cellular level. We report the frequent occurrence of tyloses and phenolic depositions in xylem vessels of strongly down-regulated trees that may be the cause of their reduced xylem conductivity.     

Characterization of the Possible Roles for B Class MADS Box Genes in Regulation of Perianth Formation in Orchid

To investigate sepal/petal/lip formation in Oncidium Gower Ramsey, three paleoAPETALA3 genes, O. Gower Ramsey MADS box gene5 (OMADS5; clade 1), OMADS3 (clade 2), and OMADS9 (clade 3), and one PISTILLATA gene, OMADS8, were characterized. The OMADS8 and OMADS3 mRNAs were expressed in all four floral organs as well as in vegetative leaves. The OMADS9 mRNA was only strongly detected in petals and lips. The mRNA for OMADS5 was only strongly detected in sepals and petals and was significantly down-regulated in lip-like petals and lip-like sepals of peloric mutant flowers. This result revealed a possible negative role for OMADS5 in regulating lip formation. Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicated that OMADS5 formed homodimers and heterodimers with OMADS3 and OMADS9. OMADS8 only formed heterodimers with OMADS3, whereas OMADS3 and OMADS9 formed homodimers and heterodimers with each other. We proposed that sepal/petal/lip formation needs the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9. The determination of the final organ identity for the sepal/petal/lip likely depended on the presence or absence of OMADS5. The presence of OMADS5 caused short sepal/petal formation. When OMADS5 was absent, cells could proliferate, resulting in the possible formation of large lips and the conversion of the sepal/petal into lips in peloric mutants. Further analysis indicated that only ectopic expression of OMADS8 but not OMADS5/9 caused the conversion of the sepal into an expanded petal-like structure in transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants.The ABCDE model predicts the formation of any flower organ by the interaction of five classes of homeotic genes in plants (Yanofsky et al., 1990; Jack et al., 1992; Mandel et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Jofuku et al., 1994; Pelaz et al., 2000, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Pinyopich et al., 2003; Ditta et al., 2004; Jack, 2004). The A class genes control sepal formation. The A, B, and E class genes work together to regulate petal formation. The B, C, and E class genes control stamen formation. The C and E class genes work to regulate carpel formation, whereas the D class gene is involved in ovule development. MADS box genes seem to have a central role in flower development, because most ABCDE genes encode MADS box proteins (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991; Weigel and Meyerowitz, 1994; Purugganan et al., 1995; Rounsley et al., 1995; Theißen and Saedler, 1995; Theißen et al., 2000; Theißen, 2001).The function of B group genes, such as APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), has been thought to have a major role in specifying petal and stamen development (Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Krizek and Meyerowitz, 1996; Kramer et al., 1998; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007; Kanno et al., 2007; Whipple et al., 2007; Irish, 2009). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutation in AP3 or PI caused identical phenotypes of second whorl petal conversion into a sepal structure and third flower whorl stamen into a carpel structure (Bowman et al., 1989; Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994). Similar homeotic conversions for petal and stamen were observed in the mutants of the AP3 and PI orthologs from a number of core eudicots such as Antirrhinum majus, Petunia hybrida, Gerbera hybrida, Solanum lycopersicum, and Nicotiana benthamiana (Sommer et al., 1990; Tröbner et al., 1992; Angenent et al., 1993; van der Krol et al., 1993; Yu et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2004; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; de Martino et al., 2006), from basal eudicot species such as Papaver somniferum and Aquilegia vulgaris (Drea et al., 2007; Kramer et al., 2007), as well as from monocot species such as Zea mays and Oryza sativa (Ambrose et al., 2000; Nagasawa et al., 2003; Prasad and Vijayraghavan, 2003; Yadav et al., 2007; Yao et al., 2008). This indicated that the function of the B class genes AP3 and PI is highly conserved during evolution.It has been thought that B group genes may have arisen from an ancestral gene through multiple gene duplication events (Doyle, 1994; Theißen et al., 1996, 2000; Purugganan, 1997; Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999; Lamb and Irish, 2003; Kim et al., 2004; Stellari et al., 2004; Zahn et al., 2005; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007). In the gymnosperms, there was a single putative B class lineage that duplicated to generate the paleoAP3 and PI lineages in angiosperms (Kramer et al., 1998; Theißen et al., 2000; Irish, 2009). The paleoAP3 lineage is composed of AP3 orthologs identified in lower eudicots, magnolid dicots, and monocots (Kramer et al., 1998). Genes in this lineage contain the conserved paleoAP3- and PI-derived motifs in the C-terminal end of the proteins, which have been thought to be characteristics of the B class ancestral gene (Kramer et al., 1998; Tzeng and Yang, 2001; Hsu and Yang, 2002). The PI lineage is composed of PI orthologs that contain a highly conserved PI motif identified in most plant species (Kramer et al., 1998). Subsequently, there was a second duplication at the base of the core eudicots that produced the euAP3 and TM6 lineages, which have been subject to substantial sequence changes in eudicots during evolution (Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999). The paleoAP3 motif in the C-terminal end of the proteins was retained in the TM6 lineage and replaced by a conserved euAP3 motif in the euAP3 lineage of most eudicot species (Kramer et al., 1998). In addition, many lineage-specific duplications for paleoAP3 lineage have occurred in plants such as orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009), Ranunculaceae, and Ranunculales (Kramer et al., 2003; Di Stilio et al., 2005; Shan et al., 2006; Kramer, 2009).Unlike the A or C class MADS box proteins, which form homodimers that regulate flower development, the ability of B class proteins to form homodimers has only been reported in gymnosperms and in the paleoAP3 and PI lineages of some monocots. For example, LMADS1 of the lily Lilium longiflorum (Tzeng and Yang, 2001), OMADS3 of the orchid Oncidium Gower Ramsey (Hsu and Yang, 2002), and PeMADS4 of the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris (Tsai et al., 2004) in the paleoAP3 lineage, LRGLOA and LRGLOB of the lily Lilium regale (Winter et al., 2002), TGGLO of the tulip Tulipa gesneriana (Kanno et al., 2003), and PeMADS6 of the orchid P. equestris (Tsai et al., 2005) in the PI lineage, and GGM2 of the gymnosperm Gnetum gnemon (Winter et al., 1999) were able to form homodimers that regulate flower development. Proteins in the euAP3 lineage and in most paleoAP3 lineages were not able to form homodimers and had to interact with PI to form heterodimers in order to regulate petal and stamen development in various plant species (Schwarz-Sommer et al., 1992; Tröbner et al., 1992; Riechmann et al., 1996; Moon et al., 1999; Winter et al., 2002; Kanno et al., 2003; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2008). In addition to forming dimers, AP3 and PI were able to interact with other MADS box proteins, such as SEPALLATA1 (SEP1), SEP2, and SEP3, to regulate petal and stamen development (Pelaz et al., 2000; Honma and Goto, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Castillejo et al., 2005).Orchids are among the most important plants in the flower market around the world, and research on MADS box genes has been reported for several species of orchids during the past few years (Lu et al., 1993, 2007; Yu and Goh, 2000; Hsu and Yang, 2002; Yu et al., 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Tsai et al., 2004, 2008; Xu et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2009). Unlike the flowers in eudicots, the nearly identical shape of the sepals and petals as well as the production of a unique lip in orchid flowers make them a very special plant species for the study of flower development. Four clades (1–4) of genes in the paleoAP3 lineage have been identified in several orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009). Several works have described the possible interactions among these four clades of paleoAP3 genes and one PI gene that are involved in regulating the differentiation and formation of the sepal/petal/lip of orchids (Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009). However, the exact mechanism that involves the orchid B class genes remains unclear and needs to be clarified by more experimental investigations.O. Gower Ramsey is a popular orchid with important economic value in cut flower markets. Only a few studies have been reported on the role of MADS box genes in regulating flower formation in this plant species (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). An AP3-like MADS gene that regulates both floral formation and initiation in transgenic Arabidopsis has been reported (Hsu and Yang, 2002). In addition, four AP1/AGAMOUS-LIKE9 (AGL9)-like MADS box genes have been characterized that show novel expression patterns and cause different effects on floral transition and formation in Arabidopsis (Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). Compared with other orchids, the production of a large and well-expanded lip and five small identical sepals/petals makes O. Gower Ramsey a special case for the study of the diverse functions of B class MADS box genes during evolution. Therefore, the isolation of more B class MADS box genes and further study of their roles in the regulation of perianth (sepal/petal/lip) formation during O. Gower Ramsey flower development are necessary. In addition to the clade 2 paleoAP3 gene OMADS3, which was previously characterized in our laboratory (Hsu and Yang, 2002), three more B class MADS box genes, OMADS5, OMADS8, and OMADS9, were characterized from O. Gower Ramsey in this study. Based on the different expression patterns and the protein interactions among these four orchid B class genes, we propose that the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9 is required for sepal/petal/lip formation. Further sepal and petal formation at least requires the additional presence of OMADS5, whereas large lip formation was seen when OMADS5 expression was absent. Our results provide a new finding and information pertaining to the roles for orchid B class MADS box genes in the regulation of sepal/petal/lip formation.     

Antisense Down-Regulation of 4CL Expression Alters Lignification,Tree Growth,and Saccharification Potential of Field-Grown Poplar

Transgenic down-regulation of the Pt4CL1 gene family encoding 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase (4CL) has been reported as a means for reducing lignin content in cell walls and increasing overall growth rates, thereby improving feedstock quality for paper and bioethanol production. Using hybrid poplar (Populus tremula × Populus alba), we applied this strategy and examined field-grown transformants for both effects on wood biochemistry and tree productivity. The reductions in lignin contents obtained correlated well with 4CL RNA expression, with a sharp decrease in lignin amount being observed for RNA expression below approximately 50% of the nontransgenic control. Relatively small lignin reductions of approximately 10% were associated with reduced productivity, decreased wood syringyl/guaiacyl lignin monomer ratios, and a small increase in the level of incorporation of H-monomers (p-hydroxyphenyl) into cell walls. Transgenic events with less than approximately 50% 4CL RNA expression were characterized by patches of reddish-brown discolored wood that had approximately twice the extractive content of controls (largely complex polyphenolics). There was no evidence that substantially reduced lignin contents increased growth rates or saccharification potential. Our results suggest that the capacity for lignin reduction is limited; below a threshold, large changes in wood chemistry and plant metabolism were observed that adversely affected productivity and potential ethanol yield. They also underline the importance of field studies to obtain physiologically meaningful results and to support technology development with transgenic trees.Composed of diverse layers of cellulose microfibrils and amorphous hemicelluloses within a matrix of pectins, proteins, and lignin, the secondary cell walls of plants are diverse in their morphology, chemistry, and physiological functions. Lignification is of particular interest, as it exhibits highly predictable temporal and spatial patterning and is the last major step in the structural reinforcement of cell walls before the protoplast is dissolved (Donaldson, 2001). To gain detailed insights into cell wall assembly, mutant or transgenic perturbations to lignin biosynthesis have been employed to alter native lignin content and monomer compositions (i.e. to shift ratios of syringyl [S], guaiacyl [G], and p-hydroxyphenyl [H] lignins; Porter et al., 1978; Miller et al., 1983; Baucher et al., 1996; Kajita et al., 1996; Lee et al., 1997; Anterola and Lewis, 2002; Davin et al., 2008a, 2008b; Patten et al., 2010a). In addition, such perturbations give needed insight into the role of lignin in providing resistance to mechanical (Mark, 1967; Niklas, 1992; Gindl and Teischinger, 2002) and biotic (Dixon and Paiva, 1995) stresses. Lignin affects xylem conductance and protects the vasculature from embolism by imparting a barrier between water under transpiration-induced tension in the xylem and the atmosphere (Raven, 1977; Boyce et al., 2004) and retards tissue digestion and decomposition by pathogens and herbivores. Economic incentives have also helped drive research on lignin reductions in wood because lignin is considered the principal cause of recalcitrance to chemical pulping and to simultaneous saccharification and fermentation to produce liquid biofuels (Huntley et al., 2003; Schubert, 2006; Jørgensen et al., 2007; Davin et al., 2008a, 2008b; Foust et al., 2008; Li et al., 2008; Yang and Wyman, 2008).Because each of the major cell wall biopolymers has different functions, changes in one component should induce “compensatory” shifts in concentrations or compositions of the others. Indeed, altering lignin composition and content has been shown to have wide-ranging effects on cell wall morphology, including specification of cell identity and plant form (Davin et al., 2008a, 2008b). An early study of aspen (Populus tremuloides) down-regulated for 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase (4CL) reported that young trees had up to 45% less lignin, increased cellulose contents, and increased growth (Hu et al., 1999). These results led Hu and coworkers (1999) to hypothesize that enhanced growth and compensatory deposition of cell wall polysaccharides resulted from reduced carbon demand for lignin synthesis. However, these results were questioned on both analytical and biochemical grounds (Anterola and Lewis, 2002). Subsequent studies of greenhouse-grown aspen (Li et al., 2003; Hancock et al., 2007, 2008) and Chinese white poplar (Populus tomentosa; Jia et al., 2004) containing transgenes that suppress RNA expression of 4CL found no comparable growth enhancement.4CL is generally considered to be the third step in the phenylpropanoid pathway. Consisting of a multigene family (Costa et al., 2005), 4CL is important for monolignol biosynthesis as well as for the generation of other secondary metabolites for plant defense in leaves and stem xylem tissues (Tsai et al., 2006). However, little is known about how down-regulation of 4CL can differentially affect the production of secondary metabolites and whether or not the types and amounts of the defense compounds produced may differ depending on the level of environmental stresses perceived by growing plants.Because of the large differences in plant physiological behavior under field versus laboratory or greenhouse conditions, and the complex development of xylem in growing trees, field studies are essential to understand the level of lignin modification that might be economically useful yet also preserve tree health and productivity. Previous field studies with other forms of lignin modification have suggested that some kinds of perturbations might be tolerated (Pilate et al., 2002). However, comparable studies have not been reported on trees with lignin modifications induced by 4CL inhibition.In this study, we report that 4CL down-regulation via antisense RNA was effective in reducing lignin contents of wood in field-grown trees. In agreement with more recent work (Li et al., 2003; Hancock et al., 2007) and in contrast to an early study (Hu et al., 1999), these changes did not promote increased growth rate. High levels of lignin reduction observed in approximately one-third of the transgenic events led to reduced growth and serious physiological abnormalities. In these low-lignin transgenic events, we identified and quantified significant nonlignin phenolic depositions and utilized a novel combination of cryofixation and confocal microscopy to visualize the in vivo distribution of these compounds within the wood. Finally, we determined that reductions in lignin content did not increase wood processability that would benefit fermentation to produce liquid biofuels.     

A Nonsense Mutation in a Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenase Gene Is Responsible for the Sorghum brown midrib6 Phenotype

brown midrib6 (bmr6) affects phenylpropanoid metabolism, resulting in reduced lignin concentrations and altered lignin composition in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Recently, bmr6 plants were shown to have limited cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase activity (CAD; EC 1.1.1.195), the enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of hydroxycinnamoyl aldehydes (monolignals) to monolignols. A candidate gene approach was taken to identify Bmr6. Two CAD genes (Sb02g024190 and Sb04g005950) were identified in the sorghum genome based on similarity to known CAD genes and through DNA sequencing a nonsense mutation was discovered in Sb04g005950 that results in a truncated protein lacking the NADPH-binding and C-terminal catalytic domains. Immunoblotting confirmed that the Bmr6 protein was absent in protein extracts from bmr6 plants. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that Bmr6 is a member of an evolutionarily conserved group of CAD proteins, which function in lignin biosynthesis. In addition, Bmr6 is distinct from the other CAD-like proteins in sorghum, including SbCAD4 (Sb02g024190). Although both Bmr6 and SbCAD4 are expressed in sorghum internodes, an examination of enzymatic activity of recombinant Bmr6 and SbCAD4 showed that Bmr6 had 1 to 2 orders of magnitude greater activity for monolignol substrates. Modeling of Bmr6 and SbCAD4 protein structures showed differences in the amino acid composition of the active site that could explain the difference in enzyme activity. These differences include His-57, which is unique to Bmr6 and other grass CADs. In summary, Bmr6 encodes the major CAD protein involved in lignin synthesis in sorghum, and the bmr6 mutant is a null allele.Plant cell walls constitute a vast reserve of fixed carbon. Cellulose and lignin are the first and second most abundant polymers on the planet, respectively (Jung and Ni, 1998). The world community has started to look to biomass as substrates for plant-based biologically sustainable fuels, which would mitigate carbon dioxide emission and reduce petroleum dependence (Sarath et al., 2008; Schmer et al., 2008). In the current generation of biofuels, ethanol is being synthesized via the fermentation of grain starch or sugarcane juice. For the next generation of biofuels, research is being directed toward the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels (Chang, 2007). As bioenergy technologies progress, the conversion of biomass to biofuels could involve a range of chemical, biochemical, and fermentation processes to produce biofuels; alternate biofuels, such as butanol or dimethylfuran, are also on the horizon (Ezeji et al., 2007; Roman-Leshkov et al., 2007). Most liquid biofuel production processes will likely rely on the conversion of the cell wall polysaccharides cellulose and hemicellulose into monomeric sugars.Plant cell walls consist of a complex polysaccharide moiety composed of cellulose microfibrils, composed of β-1,4-linked Glc polymers (Carpita and McCann, 2000). Connecting the cellulose microfibrils to each other is a hemicellulose network, whose structure and composition are species dependent, and which is mainly composed of glucuronoarabinoxylans in grasses (Carpita and McCann, 2000). Lignin, a nonlinear heterogeneous polymer derived from aromatic precursors, cross-links these polysaccharides, rigidifying and reinforcing the cell wall structure (Carpita and McCann, 2000). The addition of lignin polymers to the polysaccharide matrix creates a barrier that is chemically and microbially resistant.Lignin can block the liberation of sugars from the cell wall polysaccharide moieties, release compounds that can inhibit microbes used for fermenting sugars to fuels, and adhere to hydrolytic enzymes. Understanding lignin synthesis, structure, and function to increase cell wall digestibility has long been a goal for forage improvement and paper processing (Mackay et al., 1997; Jung and Ni, 1998). Recently, manipulating lignin has also become an important target for bioenergy feedstock improvement (Chen and Dixon, 2007; Li et al., 2008).Lignin is derived from the phenylpropanoid pathway and contains primarily three types of phenolic subunits: p-hydroxyphenyl, guaiacyl, and syringyl units (Dixon et al., 2001). The phenolic aldehyde precursors are reduced into their corresponding alcohols (monolignols) and subsequently transported to the cell wall (Fig. 1), where laccases and peroxidases catalyze lignin polymerization through the formation of monolignol radicals (Boerjan et al., 2003). Therefore, most research efforts to manipulate lignin have focused on biosynthesis of the monolignols. Most of the enzymes involved in monolignol synthesis have been cloned and characterized in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and other dicot species, using both mutagenic and transgenic approaches to study the impact of these gene products on dicot cell walls (Anterola and Lewis, 2002). However, there are significant differences in the architecture, polysaccharide composition, and phenylpropanoid composition of grass cell walls compared with those of dicots (Carpita and McCann, 2000; Vogel and Jung, 2001). For example, grasses contain significant amounts of p-coumaric acid and ferulic acid that are cross-linked to cell wall polysaccharides through ester and ether linkages in addition to their presence in lignin (Grabber et al., 1991; Boerjan et al., 2003). Because many of the proposed dedicated bioenergy crops are grasses, there is a need to identify and understand the function of the gene products involved in lignin biosynthesis in these species (Vermerris et al., 2007; Li et al., 2008; Sarath et al., 2008).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The CAD enzyme and its role in the monolignol biosynthetic pathway. A, CAD catalyzes the conversion of cinnamyl aldehydes to alcohols using NADPH as its cofactor. p-Coumaryl aldehyde and alcohol, R₁ and R₂ = H; caffeoyl aldehyde and alcohol, R₁ and R₂ = OH; coniferyl aldehyde and alcohol, R₁ = H and R₂ = OCH₃; sinapyl aldehyde and alcohol, R₁ and R₂ = OCH₃. B, A simplified model of the lignin biosynthetic pathway where CAD catalyzes the final step in monolignol biosynthesis.The brown midrib phenotype has been useful for identifying mutants affecting lignin synthesis in grasses because it is a visible phenotype. Spontaneous brown midrib mutants were first discovered in maize (Zea mays; Jorgenson, 1931) and were subsequently generated in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) using diethyl sulfate mutagenesis (Porter et al., 1978). Brown midrib mutants in maize, sorghum, and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) have increased forage digestibility for livestock (Cherney et al., 1990; Akin et al., 1993; Jung et al., 1998; Oliver et al., 2004). In maize and sorghum, there are at least four brown midrib loci in their respective genomes (Jorgenson, 1931; Porter et al., 1978; Gupta, 1995). The genes encoding bm3 in maize and bmr12 in sorghum are the only loci cloned to date, and both encode highly similar caffeic acid O-methyl transferases (Vignols et al., 1995; Bout and Vermerris, 2003). A second brown midrib locus associated with reduced cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) activity has been identified both in maize (bm1; Halpin et al., 1998) and sorghum (bmr6; Bucholtz et al., 1980; Pillonel et al., 1991). CAD is a member of the alcohol dehydrogenase superfamily of proteins that catalyzes the conversion of the hydroxycinnamoyl aldehydes into alcohols prior to their incorporation into lignin polymers (Fig. 1). Reduced CAD activity results in increased digestibility on dry weight basis, altered cell wall architecture, reduced lignin level, and the incorporation of phenolic aldehydes into lignin in sorghum and maize (Pillonel et al., 1991; Provan et al., 1997; Halpin et al., 1998; Marita et al., 2003; Shi et al., 2006; Palmer et al., 2008). The reduced CAD activity in bm1 has been genetically mapped to a region of the maize genome that contained a CAD gene, ZmCAD2 (Halpin et al., 1998), but a mutation was not identified. However, it has recently been shown that bm1 down-regulated the expression of several lignin biosynthetic genes, suggesting its gene product may be a regulatory protein (Shi et al., 2006; Guillaumie et al., 2007).To identify the mutation responsible for the bmr6 phenotype and to characterize how bmr6 impacts the lignin biosynthetic pathway, a candidate gene approach was taken. Here, we describe the cloning and characterization of Bmr6 and a related protein, SbCAD4. The identification and characterization of Bmr6 has revealed the major monolignol CAD protein in the grasses, which is likely to aid the development of new strategies to increase conversion of sorghum and other grass feedstocks to biofuels.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR17 Is Essential for Pollen Wall Pattern Formation in Arabidopsis

In angiosperms, pollen wall pattern formation is determined by primexine deposition on the microspores. Here, we show that AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR17 (ARF17) is essential for primexine formation and pollen development in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). The arf17 mutant exhibited a male-sterile phenotype with normal vegetative growth. ARF17 was expressed in microsporocytes and microgametophytes from meiosis to the bicellular microspore stage. Transmission electron microscopy analysis showed that primexine was absent in the arf17 mutant, which leads to pollen wall-patterning defects and pollen degradation. Callose deposition was also significantly reduced in the arf17 mutant, and the expression of CALLOSE SYNTHASE5 (CalS5), the major gene for callose biosynthesis, was approximately 10% that of the wild type. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that ARF17 can directly bind to the CalS5 promoter. As indicated by the expression of DR5-driven green fluorescent protein, which is an synthetic auxin response reporter, auxin signaling appeared to be specifically impaired in arf17 anthers. Taken together, our results suggest that ARF17 is essential for pollen wall patterning in Arabidopsis by modulating primexine formation at least partially through direct regulation of CalS5 gene expression.In angiosperms, the pollen wall is the most complex plant cell wall. It consists of the inner wall, the intine, and the outer wall, the exine. The exine is further divided into sexine and nexine layers. The sculptured sexine includes three major parts: baculum, tectum, and tryphine (Heslop-Harrison, 1971; Piffanelli et al., 1998; Ariizumi and Toriyama, 2011; Fig. 1A). Production of a functional pollen wall requires the precise spatial and temporal cooperation of gametophytic and sporophytic tissues and metabolic events (Blackmore et al., 2007). The intine layer is controlled gametophytically, while the exine is regulated sporophytically. The sporophytic tapetum cells provide material for pollen wall formation, while primexine determines pollen wall patterning (Heslop-Harrison, 1968).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Schematic representation of the pollen wall and primexine development. A, The innermost layer adjacent to the plasma membrane is the intine. The bacula (Ba), tectum (Te), and tryphine (T) make up the sexine layer. The nexine is located between the intine and the sexine layers. The exine includes the nexine and sexine layers. B, Primexine (Pr) appears between callose (Cl) and plasma membrane (Pm) at the early tetrad stage (left panel). Subsequently, the plasma membrane becomes undulated (middle panel) and sporopollenin deposits on the peak of the undulated plasma membrane to form bacula and tectum (right panel).After meiosis, four microspores were encased in callose to form a tetrad. Subsequently, the primexine develops between the callose layer and the microspore membrane (Fig. 1B), and the microspore plasma membrane becomes undulated (Fig. 1B; Fitzgerald and Knox, 1995; Southworth and Jernstedt, 1995). Sporopollenin precursors then accumulate on the peak of the undulated microspore membrane to form the bacula and tectum (Fig. 1B; Fitzgerald and Knox, 1995). After callose degradation, individual microspores are released from the tetrad, and the bacula and tectum continue to grow into exine with further sporopollenin deposition (Fitzgerald and Knox, 1995; Blackmore et al., 2007).The callose has been reported to affect primexine deposition and pollen wall pattern formation. The peripheral callose layer, secreted by the microsporocyte, acts as the mold for primexine (Waterkeyn and Bienfait, 1970; Heslop-Harrison, 1971). CALLOSE SYNTHASE5 (CalS5) is the major enzyme responsible for the biosynthesis of the callose peripheral of the tetrad (Dong et al., 2005; Nishikawa et al., 2005). Mutation of Cals5 and abnormal CalS5 pre-mRNA splicing resulted in defective peripheral callose deposition and primexine formation (Dong et al., 2005; Nishikawa et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2013). Besides CalS5, four membrane-associated proteins have also been reported to be involved in primexine formation: DEFECTIVE EXINE FORMATION1 (DEX1; Paxson-Sowders et al., 1997, 2001), NO EXINE FORMATION1 (NEF1; Ariizumi et al., 2004), RUPTURED POLLEN GRAIN1 (RPG1; Guan et al., 2008; Sun et al., 2013), and NO PRIMEXINE AND PLASMA MEMBRANE UNDULATION (NPU; Chang et al., 2012). Mutation of DEX1 results in delayed primexine formation (Paxson-Sowders et al., 2001). The primexine in nef1 is coarse compared with the wild type (Ariizumi et al., 2004). The loss-of-function rpg1 shows reduced primexine deposition (Guan et al., 2008; Sun et al., 2013), while the npu mutant does not deposit any primexine (Chang et al., 2012). Recently, it was reported that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE G1 (CDKG1) associates with the spliceosome to regulate the CalS5 pre-mRNA splicing for pollen wall formation (Huang et al., 2013). Clearly, disrupted primexine deposition leads to aberrant pollen wall patterning and ruptured pollen grains in these mutants.The plant hormone auxin has multiple roles in plant reproductive development (Aloni et al., 2006; Sundberg and Østergaard, 2009). Knocking out the two auxin biosynthesis genes, YUC2 and YUC6, caused an essentially sterile phenotype in Arabidopsis (Cheng et al., 2006). Auxin transport is essential for anther development; defects in auxin flow in anther filaments resulted in abnormal pollen mitosis and pollen development (Feng et al., 2006). Ding et al. (2012) showed that the endoplasmic reticulum-localized auxin transporter PIN8 regulates auxin homeostasis and male gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. Evidence for the localization, biosynthesis, and transport of auxin indicates that auxin regulates anther dehiscence, pollen maturation, and filament elongation during late anther development (Cecchetti et al., 2004, 2008). The role of auxin in pollen wall development has not been reported.The auxin signaling pathway requires the auxin response factor (ARF) family proteins (Quint and Gray, 2006; Guilfoyle and Hagen, 2007; Mockaitis and Estelle, 2008; Vanneste and Friml, 2009). ARF proteins can either activate or repress the expression of target genes by directly binding to auxin response elements (AuxRE; TGTCTC/GAGACA) in the promoters (Ulmasov et al., 1999; Tiwari et al., 2003). The Arabidopsis ARF family contains 23 members. A subgroup in the ARF family, ARF10, ARF16, and ARF17, are targets of miRNA160 (Okushima et al., 2005b; Wang et al., 2005). Plants expressing miR160-resistant ARF17 exhibited pleiotropic developmental defects, including abnormal stamen structure and reduced fertility (Mallory et al., 2005). This indicates a potential role for ARF17 in plant fertility, although the detailed function remains unknown. In addition, ARF17 was also proposed to negatively regulate adventitious root formation (Sorin et al., 2005; Gutierrez et al., 2009), although an ARF17 knockout mutant was not reported and its phenotype is unknown.In this work, we isolated and characterized a loss-of-function mutant of ARF17. Results from cytological observations suggest that ARF17 controls callose biosynthesis and primexine deposition. Consistent with this, the ARF17 protein is highly abundant in microsporocytes and tetrads. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the ARF17 protein is able to bind the promoter region of CalS5. Our results suggest that ARF17 regulates pollen wall pattern formation in Arabidopsis.