Identification of Infected B-Cell Populations by Using a Recombinant Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 Expressing a Fluorescent Protein

Infection of inbred mice with murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV68) has proven to be a powerful tool to study gammaherpesvirus pathogenesis. However, one of the limitations of this system has been the inability to directly detect infected cells harvested from infected animals. To address this issue, we generated a transgenic virus that expresses the enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (YFP), driven by the human cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter and enhancer, from a neutral locus within the viral genome. This virus, MHV68-YFP, replicated and established latency as efficiently as did the wild-type virus. During the early phase of viral latency, MHV68-YFP efficiently marked latently infected cells in the spleen after intranasal inoculation. Staining splenocytes for expression of various surface markers demonstrated the presence of MHV68 in distinct populations of splenic B cells harboring MHV68. Notably, these analyses also revealed that markers used to discriminate between newly formed, follicular and marginal zone B cells may not be reliable for phenotyping B cells harboring MHV68 since virus infection appears to modulate cell surface expression levels of CD21 and CD23. However, as expected, we observed that the overwhelming majority of latently infected B cells at the peak of latency exhibited a germinal center phenotype. These analyses also demonstrated that a significant percentage of MHV68-infected splenocytes at the peak of viral latency are plasma cells (ca. 15% at day 14 and ca. 8% at day 18). Notably, the frequency of virus-infected plasma cells correlated well with the frequency of splenocytes that spontaneously reactivate virus upon explant. Finally, we observed that the efficiency of marking latently infected B cells with the MHV68-YFP recombinant virus declined at later times postinfection, likely due to shut down of transgene expression, and indicating that the utility of this marking strategy is currently limited to the early stages of virus infection.Gammaherpesviruses are characterized by their ability to establish life-long infection in lymphocytes of their host as well as their oncogenic potential. The human gammaherpesviruses, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8; also known as Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus [KSHV]), are associated with a variety of neoplasms. EBV has been implicated in Burkitt''s lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and non-Hodgkin''s lymphoma (15, 27, 33). HHV-8 has been associated with Kaposi''s sarcoma, primary effusion lymphoma, and multicentric Castleman''s disease (4, 5, 7, 24).Research on the human gammaherpesvirus is hindered by their strict species specificity, and thus has been limited mostly to in vitro analyses. Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV68) is a closely related gammaherpesvirus that naturally infects rodents and provides a useful small animal model to study aspects of gammaherpesvirus pathogenesis that cannot be addressed for the human herpesviruses (3, 22, 25). In addition, the viral genome has been cloned as a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) and can readily be manipulated in Escherichia coli (1) and, coupled with the availability of numerous transgenic and knockout strains of mice, MHV68 infection of laboratory mice has provided a powerful small animal model for characterizing basic aspects of gammaherpesvirus pathogenesis in vivo.Like the human gammaherpesviruses, MHV68 establishes long-term latency in B cells, although at early time points after infection latency can also be detected in macrophages and dendritic cells (11, 26, 30). Acute infection is cleared around 2 to 3 weeks postinfection, and by days 16 to 18 postinfection the frequency of viral genome-positive cells in the spleen is ca. 1 in 100 splenocytes (19, 31). This is the peak of splenic latency, and the frequency of infected cells begins to decline significantly until it reaches a steady-state level of ca. 1 in 10,000 splenocytes by 3 months postinfection. Previous analyses have shown that latency is mainly established in germinal center (GC) and memory B cells (12, 19, 31). At early time points during the establishment of latency, the GC fraction has been shown to have the highest percentage of infected cells (ca. 60 to 80% of MHV68-infected B cells) (12). However, even in this population, only around 10% of total GC cells are infected (12). This low frequency limits detailed molecular analyses that can be performed on infected cells (e.g., analysis of virus-induced changes in cellular gene expression).Until now, there has not been an efficient way to directly detect or purify/enrich for MHV68-infected cells harvested from the spleens of infected mice. Because of these issues, we sought to develop a method to efficiently mark infected cells that would allow easy detection, as well as isolation, of infected cells. To this end, we created a transgenic virus that expresses the enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) from a neutral locus in the viral genome located between open reading frames (ORFs) 27 and 29b. We have previously used this locus to introduce other transgenes (Cre-recombinase and IκBαM expression cassettes) and have shown that this locus tolerates the insertion of transgene expression cassettes (14, 20). We show here that the MHV68-YFP recombinant virus is capable of efficiently marking infected cells, that highly enriched populations of infected cells can easily be isolated based of YFP expression, and that direct detection of infected cells provides a powerful tool for phenotypic analysis of infected cell populations.     

Dendritic Cells Loaded with Tumor B Cells Elicit Broad Immunity against Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 but Fail To Prevent Long-Term Latency

It is still unknown whether a noninfectious gammaherpesvirus vaccine is able to prevent or reduce virus persistence. This led us to use dendritic cells loaded with tumor B cells as a vaccine approach for the murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (γHV68) model of infection. Dendritic cells loaded with UV-irradiated latently infected tumor B cells induce broad, strong, and long-lasting immunity against γHV68. Dendritic cell vaccination prevents the enlargement of lymph nodes and severely limits acute infection and early latency but does not prevent γHV68 from establishing long-term latency. Our findings support the concept that attenuated viruses may be the best vaccine option for preventing gammaherpesvirus persistence.Gammaherpesviruses have very high prevalence, infecting 95% of the world population. Natural infection does not induce sterilizing immunity (21, 30). Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (γHV68) has important biological similarities to its human counterparts and is a good model for characterizing the immune response and for testing vaccine strategies (11, 33). Gammaherpesvirus vaccines designed to induce neutralizing antibodies reduce the incidence and symptoms of infectious mononucleosis (26) but are only minimally protective (1, 7, 22, 28). Peptide- or epitope-based vaccines that induce T-cell responses affect the early phase of infection but do not alter long-term latency (9, 17, 19, 29, 32). Infection with latency-attenuated viruses induces protection against a challenge with wild-type γHV68, although the vaccine virus persists in the host (6, 25, 30) except in the case of γHV68 AC-RTA (16). These findings with live-attenuated viruses reflect the ability of latency-defective viruses to elicit a wide range of humoral and cell-mediated immune responses and suggest that optimal broad immunity may achieve protection. Dendritic cells (DC) are at the core of the immune response, and they are also the main target of adjuvants. Ex vivo-loaded dendritic cells can induce humoral immunity and strong T-cell immunity (3) and accelerated generation of memory T cells (2). Dendritic cells loaded with multiple antigens could circumvent the narrow antigen specificity of peptide- or epitope-based vaccines and lack the safety concerns associated with live-attenuated herpesviruses. Thus, dendritic cell vaccination can be attractive where other approaches have failed or as a tool for elucidating mechanisms of immune protection. Here, we wanted to test whether dendritic cells loaded ex vivo with a broad range of viral antigens would ameliorate disease and confer protection to gammaherpesvirus infection by inducing strong and broad cellular and humoral immunity.     

Open Reading Frame 33 of a Gammaherpesvirus Encodes a Tegument Protein Essential for Virion Morphogenesis and Egress

Tegument is a unique structure of herpesvirus, which surrounds the capsid and interacts with the envelope. Morphogenesis of gammaherpesvirus is poorly understood due to lack of efficient lytic replication for Epstein-Barr virus and Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus/human herpesvirus 8, which are etiologically associated with several types of human malignancies. Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV-68) is genetically related to the human gammaherpesviruses and presents an excellent model for studying de novo lytic replication of gammaherpesviruses. MHV-68 open reading frame 33 (ORF33) is conserved among Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaherpesvirinae subfamilies. However, the specific role of ORF33 in gammaherpesvirus replication has not yet been characterized. We describe here that ORF33 is a true late gene and encodes a tegument protein. By constructing an ORF33-null MHV-68 mutant, we demonstrated that ORF33 is not required for viral DNA replication, early and late gene expression, viral DNA packaging or capsid assembly but is required for virion morphogenesis and egress. Although the ORF33-null virus was deficient in release of infectious virions, partially tegumented capsids produced by the ORF33-null mutant accumulated in the cytoplasm, containing conserved capsid proteins, ORF52 tegument protein, but virtually no ORF45 tegument protein and the 65-kDa glycoprotein B. Finally, we found that the defect of ORF33-null MHV-68 could be rescued by providing ORF33 in trans or in an ORF33-null revertant virus. Taken together, our results indicate that ORF33 is a tegument protein required for viral lytic replication and functions in virion morphogenesis and egress.Gammaherpesviruses are associated with tumorigenesis. Like other herpesviruses, they are characterized as having two distinct stages in their life cycle: lytic replication and latency (15, 16, 18, 21, 54). Latency provides the viruses with advantages to escape host immune surveillance and to establish lifelong persistent infection and contributes to transformation and development of malignancies. However, it is through lytic replication that viruses propagate and transmit among hosts to maintain viral reservoirs. Both viral latency and lytic replication play important roles in tumorigenesis. The gammaherpesvirus subfamily includes Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV)/human herpesvirus 8 and murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV-68), among others. EBV is associated with Burkitt''s lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Hodgkin''s disease, and lymphoproliferative diseases in immunodeficient patients (28). KSHV is etiologically linked with Kaposi''s sarcoma, primary effusion lymphoma, and multicentric Castleman''s disease (11-13, 22, 52). Neither in vivo nor in vitro studies of EBV and KSHV are convenient due to their propensity to establish latency in cell culture and their limited host ranges.MHV-68 is genetically related to these two human gammaherpesviruses, especially to KSHV, based on the alignment of their genomic sequences and other biological properties (55). As a natural pathogen of wild rodents, MHV-68 also infects laboratory mice (6, 40, 46) and replicates to a high titer in a variety of fibroblast and epithelial cell lines. These advantages make MHV-68 an excellent model for studying the lytic replication of gammaherpesviruses in vitro and certain aspects of virus-host interactions in vivo. In addition, the MHV-68 genome has been cloned as a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) that can propagate in Escherichia coli (1, 2, 36, 51), making it convenient to study the function of each open reading frame (ORF) by genetic methods. Exploring the functions of MHV-68 ORFs will likely shed light on the functions of their homologues in human gammaherpesviruses.Gammaherpesviral particles have a characteristic multilayered architecture. An infectious virion contains a double-stranded DNA genome, an icosahedral capsid shell, a thick, proteinaceous tegument compartment, and a lipid bilayer envelope spiked with glycoproteins (14, 30, 47, 49). As a unique structure of herpesviruses, the tegument plays important roles in multiple aspects of the viral life cycle, including virion assembly and egress (38, 48, 53), translocation of nucleocapsids into the nucleus, transactivation of viral immediate-early genes, and modulation of host cell gene expression, innate immunity, and signal transduction (9, 10, 23, 60). Some components of MHV-68 tegument have been identified by a mass spectrometric study (8), and the functions of some tegument proteins have been revealed, such as ORF45, ORF52, and ORF75c (7, 24, 29).MHV-68 ORF33 is conserved among Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaherpesvirinae subfamilies. Its homologues include human herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) UL16, human herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) UL16, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL94, EBV BGLF2, KSHV ORF33, and rhesus monkey rhadinovirus (RRV) ORF33. HSV-1 UL16 has been identified as a tegument protein and may function in viral DNA packaging, virion assembly, budding, and egress (5, 32, 35, 41, 44). HCMV UL94 is a virion associated protein and might function in virion assembly and budding (31, 57). EBV BGLF2, KSHV ORF33, and RRV ORF33 are also virion-associated proteins, but their functions are not clear (26, 43, 59). The mass spectrometric study of MHV-68 did not identify ORF33 as a virion component (8), although ORF33 is found to be essential for viral lytic replication by transposon mutagenesis of the MHV-68 genome cloned as a BAC (51). However, insertion of the 1.2-kbp Mu transposon in that study may influence the expression of ORFs approximate to ORF33. Consequently, the role ORF33 plays in viral replication needs to be confirmed, preferably through site-directed mutagenesis. Whether ORF33 is a tegument protein and the exact viral replication stage in which it functions also need to be investigated.We determined that MHV-68 ORF33 encodes a tegument protein and is expressed with true late kinetics. To explore the function of ORF33 in viral lytic phase, we used site-directed mutagenesis and generated an ORF33-null mutant, taking advantage of the MHV-68 BAC system. We showed that the ORF33-null mutant is capable of viral DNA replication, early and late gene expression, capsid assembly, and DNA packaging, but incapable of virion release. The defect of ORF33-null mutant can be rescued in trans by an ORF33 expression plasmid.     

The Spike Protein of Murine Coronavirus Regulates Viral Genome Transport from the Cell Surface to the Endoplasmic Reticulum during Infection

We observed that the nonfusogenic mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) strain MHV-2 reached a titer of ∼2 log₁₀ higher than that of the fusogenic strain A59 in astrocytoma DBT cells. To determine whether the spike protein is responsible for the difference, a recombinant virus, Penn-98-1, that contains the A59 genome with a spike from MHV-2 was used to infect DBT cells. Results showed that Penn-98-1 behaved like MHV-2, thus establishing a role for the spike protein in viral growth. The inverse correlation between viral fusogenicity and growth was further established in four different cell types and with a fusogenic mutant, the S757R mutant, derived from isogenic Penn-98-1. While both A59 and Penn-98-1 entered cells at similar levels, viral RNA and protein syntheses were significantly delayed for A59. Interestingly, when the genomic RNAs were delivered directly into the cells via transfection, the levels of gene expression for these viruses were similar. Furthermore, cell fractionation experiments revealed that significantly more genomic RNAs for the nonfusogenic MHVs were detected in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) within the first 2 h after infection than for the fusogenic MHVs. Pretreatment of Penn-98-1 with trypsin reversed its properties in syncytium formation, virus production, and genome transport to the ER. These findings identified a novel role for the spike protein in regulating the uncoating and delivery of the viral genome to the ER after internalization.Murine coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) is a member of the family Coronaviridae. It is an enveloped, positive-strand-RNA virus. The viral envelope contains three or four structural proteins, depending on the virus strain (21). The spike (S) protein is a glycoprotein with a molecular mass of approximately 180 kDa. For some MHV strains, such as JHM and A59, the S protein is cleaved by a furin-like proteinase into two subunits, the amino-terminal S1 and the carboxyl-terminal S2. The S1 subunit is thought to form the globular head of the spike and is responsible for the initial attachment of the virus to the receptor on the cell surface. The S2 subunit, which forms the stalk portion of the spike and which anchors the S protein to the viral envelope, facilitates the fusion between the viral envelope and the cell membrane and cell-cell fusion (4, 7, 20, 25, 39). In contrast, the S protein of some other MHV strains, such as MHV-2, does not undergo cleavage and usually does not cause cell-cell fusion (15, 34). It appears that the cleavability of the MHV S protein is associated usually, though not always, with its fusogenicity (10, 36). It has been suggested that the fusogenicity of the S protein may determine the route of virus entry, i.e., via direct fusion with plasma membranes or following endocytosis (11, 34), although the mechanism for virus-induced cell-cell fusion may differ from that for virus-cell fusion during entry (8). The S protein also elicits the induction of neutralizing antibodies and cell-mediated immunity in infected hosts (3). It is therefore an important determinant for viral infectivity, pathogenicity, and virulence (2, 5, 31, 38). The hemagglutinin-esterase (HE) protein is present only in certain MHV strains (22, 42) and may play a role in viral pathogenesis (44, 45). The small envelope (E) protein and the membrane (M) protein play a key role in virus assembly (40). The nucleocapsid (N) protein is a phosphoprotein of approximately 50 kDa and is associated with the RNA genome to form the nucleocapsid inside the envelope (21, 37).Infection of host cells by MHV is mediated through the interaction between the S protein and the cellular receptors that are members of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family of the immunoglobulin superfamily (9). This interaction then triggers fusion between the viral envelope and the plasma membrane or the endosomal membrane, the latter of which follows receptor-mediated endocytosis, thus allowing the nucleocapsid to deliver into the cytoplasm. Direct entry from the plasma membrane appears to be the predominant route for most MHV strains (19, 28), although entry by some mutant MHVs, such as OBLV60 and MHV-2, is low pH dependent, i.e., via endocytosis (11, 34). However, nothing is known about how the genomic RNA is transported to the rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER) for translation. Once on the ER, the viral genomic RNA is translated into a polymerase polyprotein from the 5′-end two open reading frames (two-thirds of the genome) via ribosomal frameshifting. The polymerase polyproteins in turn synthesize genomic and multiple species of subgenomic mRNAs. These mRNAs are then translated into nonstructural and structural proteins, the latter of which are essential for generation of progeny viruses.MHV can infect rodents, causing hepatitis, enteritis, nephritis, and central nervous system diseases. In the mouse central nervous system, some MHV strains, such as JHM and A59, are neurovirulent, causing acute encephalitis and chronic demyelination (1, 13), while others, such as MHV-2, exhibit extremely low neurovirulence, causing only meningitis without apparent encephalitis and demyelination (6, 16, 41). Extensive mutagenesis studies in combination with targeted RNA recombination have identified that the S protein is the major determinant of MHV pathogenicity in animals, although other viral genes also appear to modulate viral pathogenicity (17, 32). For example, the recombinant MHV Penn-98-1, which contains the S protein of MHV-2 in an A59 genome background, causes acute meningoencephalitis similar to that caused by A59 but does not cause demyelination similar to that observed for MHV-2 (6). It has also been shown that the amounts of antigen staining and necrosis in the liver correlate with the viral titer, which is determined largely by the S protein (29). However, how the S protein affects viral titer in cell culture and in animals is not known.In the present study, we initially observed that the levels of production of infectious viruses in an astrocytoma DBT cell line were markedly different among three MHV strains. Using the recombinant MHV Penn-98-1 and its isogenic S757R mutant, we further established that the S protein is responsible for the observed difference. The difference in virus production between A59 and Penn-98-1 was detected as early as 4 to 6 h postinfection (p.i.) and likely occurred during the early stages of the virus life cycle but after virus internalization. Interestingly, when the genomic RNAs were delivered directly into the cells via transfection, the levels of gene expression for these viruses were similar. Furthermore, cell fractionation experiments revealed that significantly more genomic RNAs for nonfusogenic MHVs were delivered to the ER within the first 2 h after infection than for fusogenic MHVs. These results demonstrate that the spike protein of MHV can regulate the intracellular transport of the viral genome to the ER following internalization. To our knowledge, this is the first study identifying a role for a coronavirus S protein in genome delivery in addition to its well-established role in receptor binding and virus-cell and cell-cell fusions during infection.     

Role of Mouse Hepatitis Virus (MHV) Receptor Murine CEACAM1 in the Resistance of Mice to MHV Infection: Studies of Mice with Chimeric mCEACAM1a and mCEACAM1b

Although most inbred mouse strains are highly susceptible to mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) infection, the inbred SJL line of mice is highly resistant to its infection. The principal receptor for MHV is murine CEACAM1 (mCEACAM1). Susceptible strains of mice are homozygous for the 1a allele of mCeacam1, while SJL mice are homozygous for the 1b allele. mCEACAM1a (1a) has a 10- to 100-fold-higher receptor activity than does mCEACAM1b (1b). To explore the hypothesis that MHV susceptibility is due to the different MHV receptor activities of 1a and 1b, we established a chimeric C57BL/6 mouse (cB61ba) in which a part of the N-terminal immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domain of the mCeacam1a (1a) gene, which is responsible for MHV receptor function, is replaced by the corresponding region of mCeacam1b (1b). We compared the MHV susceptibility of these chimeric mice to that of SJL and B6 mice. B6 mice that are homozygous for 1a are highly susceptible to MHV-A59 infection, with a 50% lethal dose (LD₅₀) of 10^2.5 PFU, while chimeric cB61ba mice and SJL mice homozygous for 1ba and 1b, respectively, survived following inoculation with 10⁵ PFU. Unexpectedly, cB61ba mice were more resistant to MHV-A59 infection than SJL mice as measured by virus replication in target organs, including liver and brain. No infectious virus or viral RNA was detected in the organs of cB61ba mice, while viral RNA and infectious virus were detected in target organs of SJL mice. Furthermore, SJL mice produced antiviral antibodies after MHV-A59 inoculation with 10⁵ PFU, but cB61ba mice did not. Thus, cB61ba mice are apparently completely resistant to MHV-A59 infection, while SJL mice permit low levels of MHV-A59 virus replication during self-limited, asymptomatic infection. When expressed on cultured BHK cells, the mCEACAM1b and mCEACAM1ba proteins had similar levels of MHV-A59 receptor activity. These results strongly support the hypothesis that although alleles of mCEACAM1 are the principal determinants of mouse susceptibility to MHV-A59, other as-yet-unidentified murine genes may also play a role in susceptibility to MHV.Differences in susceptibility to a number of viral infections have been documented among inbred mouse strains (20). These differences have been studied as models for the various degrees of susceptibility of individual humans to some viral infections. Numerous host factors have been found to be involved in such differences (2, 15). For example, allelic variations in the virus receptor and coreceptor for HIV-1 are important host factors influencing susceptibility to HIV-1 infection (36).A virus receptor is a molecule with which the virus interacts at an initial step of infection. Therefore, receptors are crucial host determinants of virus susceptibility (15, 16). A variety of receptor proteins has been identified for many different viruses, including the murine coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) (12, 50). The principal receptor for MHV is murine carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (mCEACAM1; previously called Bgp or MHVR [3]), which is in the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily (12, 50). Four isoforms of mCEACAM1a (1a) are expressed on the plasma membranes of a variety of murine cells and tissues (14). The two mCEACAM1 isoforms with a molecular mass of 100 to 120 kDa are composed of four Ig-like ectodomains, a transmembrane (TM) domain, and either a long or a short cytoplasmic tail (Cy) (3, 22). Two other isoforms consist of two Ig-like domains, with either long or short Cy (3, 22). The N-terminal (N) domain is responsible for virus binding (10, 24), the induction of conformational changes in the viral spike protein (S), and membrane fusion during virus entry and syncytium formation (13, 24). The replacement of the N-terminal domain of mCEACAM1a with that of the murine homolog of the poliovirus receptor (PVR) yields a functional receptor for MHV (10), and Ceacam1a-knockout mice are completely resistant to infection with the hepatotropic A59 strain of MHV (17, 25).Wild mice have two alleles of the mCeacam1 gene, called mCeacam1a and mCeacam1b. Inbred mouse strains that are homozygous for mCeacam1a, including BALB/c, C57BL/6 (B6), C3H, and A/J mice, etc., are highly susceptible to infection with strains of MHV. In contrast, the SJL line of inbred mice, which is resistant to death from MHV infection, is homozygous for the mCeacam1b allele (5, 11, 50). The most extensive differences in amino acid sequence between mCEACAM1a and mCEACAM1b are found in the N-terminal domain, where the virus-binding region is located (21, 22, 32). It was initially reported by Boyle et al. that mCEACAM1a proteins had MHV-A59 virus-binding activity in a virus overlay protein blot, while mCEACAM1b did not (5). Those authors speculated that the different viral affinities of these mCEACAM1 proteins may account for the various MHV-A59 susceptibilities of BALB/c mice compared to those of SJL mice (49). However, Yokomori and Lai (53) and Dveksler et al. (11) previously showed that when recombinant CEACAM1a and CEACAM1b proteins are expressed at high levels on cultured cells, both proteins have MHV-A59 receptor activity. Yokomori and Lai suggested that the difference in MHV susceptibility between BALB/c and SJL mice does not depend solely upon the interaction of the virus with mCEACAM1 proteins (52, 53). Dveksler et al. suggested that small differences in MHV-A59 receptor activity between mCEACAM1a and mCEACAM1b could result in very large biological differences during multiple cycles of infection in in vivo infection (11). We then quantitatively showed that recombinant mCEACAM1a expressed in BHK cells has 10- to 30-times-higher MHV-binding activity than mCEACAM1b (31). Similar results were observed in other laboratories (7, 32). Because the mCeacam1 gene is located on chromosome 7 (34) and the gene controlling MHV-A59 susceptibility and the resistance of BALB/c mice versus SJL mice is also located on chromosome 7 close to the mCeacam1 gene (40), we speculated that the mCeacam1 gene is identical to the gene that determines the susceptibility and/or resistance of mice to MHV-A59 and MHV-JHM infection.To examine the above-described hypothesis, we used progeny mice produced by crossing BALB/c and SJL mice. F₂ mice and F₁ mice backcrossed to SJL mice were examined for the mCeacam1 genotype and for MHV-JHM susceptibility (30). Mice homozygous for mCeacam1a (1a/1a) and heterozygous mice (1a/1b) were susceptible to lethal MHV-JHM infection, while mice homozygous for mCeacam1b (1b/1b) were not killed by inoculation with MHV-JHM. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that the susceptibility of mice to MHV is determined by the mCeacam1a allele (30). However, this classical genetic analysis could not prove that mCeacam1 alone determines the susceptibility or resistance of mice to MHV-JHM infection, because this methodology cannot rule out the possibility that a different unknown host gene located close to mCeacam1 on chromosome 7 could also affect MHV-JHM susceptibility. Therefore, we used gene replacement in B6 embryonic stem (ES) cells to create a mouse strain in which the exon encoding the N-terminal part of the N-terminal Ig domain of mCeacam1a was replaced with the corresponding region of mCeacam1b from SLJ mice. We bred the chimeric mCeacam1 gene on the B6 background (called B6 chimeric mCeacam1ba, or cB61ba). We compared these mice, wild-type B6 mice, and SJL mice for their susceptibilities to MHV-A59 infection. We confirmed that the expression of mCEACAM1a makes mice susceptible to lethal infection with MHV-A59. However, surprisingly, we found that cB61ba mice were profoundly resistant to MHV-A59 infection, while the virus could replicate at low levels in SJL mice in a self-limited, unapparent infection. Our results suggest that one or more as-yet-unidentified murine genes may also contribute to murine susceptibility and/or resistance to MHV-A59 infection.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.