Organization of F-Actin via Concerted Regulation of Kette by PTP61F and dAbl

We identify Kette, a key regulator of actin polymerization, as a substrate for Drosophila protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP61F, as well as for dAbl tyrosine kinase. We further show that dAbl is a direct substrate for PTP61F. Therefore, Kette phosphotyrosine levels are regulated both directly and indirectly by PTP61F. Kette and PTP61F genetically interact in the regulation of F-actin organization in pupal eye discs, suggesting that tyrosine phosphorylation is essential for the proper regulation of Kette-mediated actin dynamics. This hypothesis was confirmed by demonstrating the loss of Kette-mediated F-actin organization and lamella formation in S2 cells in a Kette Y482F mutant in which the dAbl phosphorylation site was eliminated. Our results establish for the first time that PTP61F and dAbl ensure proper actin organization through the coordinated and reversible tyrosine phosphorylation of Kette.The actin cytoskeleton is regulated as a function of development, cell motility, intracellular transport, and the cell cycle by the polymerization of G-actin to F-actin (34). Correct regulation of actin cytoskeletal dynamics is essential to numerous differentiating and cellular processes in the nervous system (9) and musculature (42), among others. Actin polymerization is regulated by a number of proteins, among which is human NCK-associated protein 1 (NAP-1 [3, 4, 45]). It and its Drosophila orthologue, Kette (Hem in FlyBase), are critical components in both SCAR/WAVE and WASP complexes, which play essential roles in transducing Rac1 signals to initiate Arp2/3-dependent actin polymerization (6, 25, 40, 48). Murine NAP-1 interacts with NCK, an SH2-SH3 adaptor protein (4), and is essential for proper neuronal differentiation in the cortex (53). Neuronal differentiation and neural tube defects are observed in NAP-1 mutant mice, apparently due to reduced localization of WAVE1 to the cell membrane (53).In Drosophila, loss of kette activity specifically results in the accumulation of cytosolic F-actin (6). Kette protein associates with F-actin in the cytosol, but also at focal contact sites, where it apparently antagonizes SCAR/WAVE function and activates WASP-dependent actin polymerization (6). Despite its role in repressing SCAR/WAVE function, Kette serves to protect the complex from proteosome-mediated degradation and is critical to its intracellular localization (25). At the level of the organism, kette alleles affect axonal growth and pathfinding due to aberrant actin cytoskeleton formation, for example, altering crossing of the embryonic ventral midline by VUM neuron axons, as well as generating aberrant axonal projections in both motor and sensory neurons (21). Like mammalian NAP-1, Drosophila kette also interacts with the fly NCK orthologue, dreadlocks (dock) (21). Other evidence for the conserved interaction of Kette with signaling cascades is provided by the observation that kette mutant phenotypes are partially rescuable by overexpression of the small G protein Rac1 (21). The interaction of kette with dock suggests the possibility of tyrosine phosphorylation in the regulation of Kette activity, but no evidence supporting this hypothesis has been reported.Signaling by tyrosine phosphorylation in various metazoans controls numerous processes involved in cellular differentiation and proliferation. Many of the components regulating tyrosine phosphorylation have been identified and characterized using genetic, biochemical, molecular, and genomic sequence analyses (31). However, in contrast to the very well-characterized regulation of cellular processes by kinase-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation (15, 52), their regulation by dephosphorylation by protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) has generally lagged behind. Although the functions of several receptor PTPs have been clearly defined as playing essential roles in axon guidance in both Drosophila (12, 23, 41, 47, 50) and mammals (44, 49), our understanding of nontransmembrane PTPs (NT-PTPs) is more limited. Only three of the eight putative Drosophila NT-PTPs have been characterized genetically. Corkscrew (Csw) acts as a downstream effector of various receptor protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and is essential for R7 photoreceptor development (35). PTP-enhancer of Ras1 has been characterized as an essential regulator antagonizing signaling mediated by Ras1, possibly through tyrosine dephosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (24, 36). More recently, it has been shown that PTP-meg participates in the establishment and maintenance of axon projections in the Drosophila brain (51). Other than these, the functions of Drosophila NT-PTPs remain largely unknown.PTP61F was originally identified as an NT-PTP that contains one phosphatase domain in the N-terminal region and five proline-rich motifs in the C-terminal tail (29). It is the Drosophila orthologue of mammalian PTP1B and T-cell PTP (TC-PTP) (1), which have been implicated in the regulation of signaling by both insulin (39) and JAK/STAT (33). Two PTP61F isoforms due to alternative splicing possess unique sequences at the C terminus, which determine either internal membrane-association (PTP61Fm) or nuclear localization (PTP61Fn) (29). To date, limited data suggest that PTP61F may participate in the downregulation of JAK/STAT signaling (2, 32), although the underlying mechanism remains unexplored. While PTP61F may recognize the adaptor proteins DOCK (10) and Abi (20) as potential substrates, the signaling pathways involving these interactions have not been clearly defined. In this study, we demonstrate for the first time that the regulation of Kette, and hence the localization and polymerization of the actin cytoskeleton, is achieved by reversible tyrosine phosphorylation under the control of both PTP61F and the PTK dAbl.     

Microtubule-Nucleus Interactions in Dictyostelium discoideum Mediated by Central Motor Kinesins

Kinesins are a diverse superfamily of motor proteins that drive organelles and other microtubule-based movements in eukaryotic cells. These motors play important roles in multiple events during both interphase and cell division. Dictyostelium discoideum contains 13 kinesin motors, 12 of which are grouped into nine families, plus one orphan. Functions for 11 of the 13 motors have been previously investigated; we address here the activities of the two remaining kinesins, both isoforms with central motor domains. Kif6 (of the kinesin-13 family) appears to be essential for cell viability. The partial knockdown of Kif6 with RNA interference generates mitotic defects (lagging chromosomes and aberrant spindle assemblies) that are consistent with kinesin-13 disruptions in other organisms. However, the orphan motor Kif9 participates in a completely novel kinesin activity, one that maintains a connection between the microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) and nucleus during interphase. kif9 null cell growth is impaired, and the MTOC appears to disconnect from its normally tight nuclear linkage. Mitotic spindles elongate in a normal fashion in kif9⁻ cells, but we hypothesize that this kinesin is important for positioning the MTOC into the nuclear envelope during prophase. This function would be significant for the early steps of cell division and also may play a role in regulating centrosome replication.Directed cell migration, organelle transport, and cell division involve fundamental motilities that are necessary for eukaryotic cell viability and function. Much of the force required for these motilities is generated through the cyclical interactions of motor proteins with the cell cytoskeleton. Microtubules (MTs) and actin filaments provide structural support and directional guides, and all eukaryotic organisms have diverse, often extensive families of motors that carry out different tasks. Functional studies have revealed that many of the motors work in combination with others, and that the individual deletion of a single motor activity often is insufficient to produce a defect that substantially impairs cell growth or function. The latter phenomenon is particularly evident in some organisms with simple motor families (14, 42). By contrasting homologous motor functions between simple and complex systems, we hope to learn the details of how each motor is custom-tuned for specific tasks.Dictyostelium discoideum is a compact amoeba that exhibits robust forms of motility common to nearly all animal cells, with speeds that frequently exceed corresponding rates in vertebrate cell models (25, 33, 54). Since Dictyostelium possesses a relatively small number of motor proteins (13 kinesin, 1 dynein, and 13 myosin isoforms [23, 24, 26]), it combines advantages of terrific cytology with straightforward molecular genetics and thus represents an excellent model to investigate individual and combined motor protein actions. To date, 11 of the 13 kinesin motors have been analyzed functionally (5, 17, 18, 30, 42, 46, 51, 60). Only 1 of these 11 motors, Kif3, a member of the kinesin-1 family of organelle transporters, appears to be essential for organism viability (51). Individual disruptions of three kinesin genes (kif1, kif4, and kif12) produce distinctive defects in cell growth or organelle transport (30, 42, 46). Analyses of six of the seven other kinesins reveal important phenotypes but only when combined with other motor disruptions or cell stresses. We address here the roles of the remaining two Dictyostelium MT-based motors.kif6 and kif9 encode two central motor kinesins in the Dictyostelium genome (24). The best-studied isoforms of this motor type are represented by the kinesin-13 family, and they largely function to regulate MT length during cell division (13, 16, 40, 41). In some organisms, kinesin-13 motors also have been shown to operate during interphase and to mediate MT and flagellar length control (3, 4, 15) and perhaps even organelle transport (32, 43, 56). kif6 encodes the kinesin-13 family member in Dictyostelium. We demonstrate that Kif6 activity is essential for viability, and that it plays a primary, conserved role in chromosome segregation during cell division.The second of the central motor kinesins, Kif9, does not group with an existing family (24, 38). The gene disruption of this motor reveals a completely novel function for a kinesin in maintaining a connection between the MT-organizing center (MTOC) and the nucleus. By electron microscopy (EM), the MTOC of Dictyostelium appears as a cytoplasmic cube-shaped structure surrounded by amorphous dense material (39, 44). EM, biochemical analyses, antibody labeling, and live-cell imaging studies have demonstrated that during interphase, the cytoplasmic MTOC is firmly and closely attached to the nucleus (28, 29, 44, 48, 49, 63). Upon entry into mitosis, the MTOC duplicates during prophase and is brought to or into a fenestration of the nuclear envelope, and then it establishes an intranuclear bipolar spindle for division (39, 53, 64). While MTOCs can be purified from Dictyostelium, the methods rely heavily on reagents that actively disrupt the attached nuclei (10, 59). A recent study has identified at least one component of this connection, the nuclear envelope protein Sun-1 (67). The perturbation of Sun-1 affects nuclear shape and results in centrosome detachment, hyperamplification, and aneuploidy. We demonstrate in the current work that the disruption of the Kif9 kinesin also perturbs the MTOC-nucleus linkage. Our results suggest that an MT-mediated mechanism plays a significant role in maintaining an MTOC-nucleus connection during interphase, and we discuss how this connection could be important to regulate centrosome replication and ensure proper chromosome segregation during cell division.     

Asp1, a Conserved 1/3 Inositol Polyphosphate Kinase,Regulates the Dimorphic Switch in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

The ability to undergo dramatic morphological changes in response to extrinsic cues is conserved in fungi. We have used the model yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe to determine which intracellular signal regulates the dimorphic switch from the single-cell yeast form to the filamentous invasive growth form. The S. pombe Asp1 protein, a member of the conserved Vip1 1/3 inositol polyphosphate kinase family, is a key regulator of the morphological switch via the cAMP protein kinase A (PKA) pathway. Lack of a functional Asp1 kinase domain abolishes invasive growth which is monopolar, while an increase in Asp1-generated inositol pyrophosphates (PP) increases the cellular response. Remarkably, the Asp1 kinase activity encoded by the N-terminal part of the protein is regulated negatively by the C-terminal domain of Asp1, which has homology to acid histidine phosphatases. Thus, the fine tuning of the cellular response to environmental cues is modulated by the same protein. As the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Asp1 ortholog is also required for the dimorphic switch in this yeast, we propose that Vip1 family members have a general role in regulating fungal dimorphism.Eucaryotic cells are able to define and maintain a particular cellular organization and thus cellular morphology by executing programs modulated by internal and external signals. For example, signals generated within a cell are required for the selection of the growth zone after cytokinesis in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe or the emergence of the bud in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (37, 44, 81). Cellular morphogenesis is also subject to regulation by a wide variety of external signals, such as growth factors, temperature, hormones, nutrient limitation, and cell-cell or cell-substrate contact (13, 34, 66, 75, 81). Both types of signals will lead to the selection of growth zones accompanied by the reorganization of the cytoskeleton.The ability to alter the growth form in response to environmental conditions is an important virulence-associated trait of pathogenic fungi which helps the pathogen to spread in and survive the host''s defense system (7, 32). Alteration of the growth form in response to extrinsic signals is not limited to pathogenic fungi but is also found in the model yeasts S. cerevisiae and S. pombe, in which it appears to represent a foraging response (1, 24).The regulation of polarized growth and the definition of growth zones have been studied extensively with the fission yeast S. pombe. In this cylindrically shaped organism, cell wall biosynthesis is restricted to one or both cell ends in a cell cycle-regulated manner and to the septum during cytokinesis (38). This mode of growth requires the actin cytoskeleton to direct growth and the microtubule cytoskeleton to define the growth sites (60). In interphase cells, microtubules are organized in antiparallel bundles that are aligned along the long axis of the cell and grow from their plus ends toward the cell tips. Upon contact with the cell end, microtubule growth will first pause and then undergo a catastrophic event and microtubule shrinkage (21). This dynamic behavior of the microtubule plus end is regulated by a disparate, conserved, microtubule plus end group of proteins, called the +TIPs. The +TIP complex containing the EB1 family member Mal3 is required for the delivery of the Tea1-Tea4 complex to the cell tip (6, 11, 27, 45, 77). The latter complex docks at the cell end and recruits proteins required for actin nucleation (46, 76). Thus, the intricate cross talk between the actin and the microtubule cytoskeleton at specific intracellular locations is necessary for cell cycle-dependent polarized growth of the fission yeast cell.The intense analysis of polarized growth control in single-celled S. pombe makes this yeast an attractive organism for the identification of key regulatory components of the dimorphic switch. S. pombe multicellular invasive growth has been observed for specific strains under specific conditions, such as nitrogen and ammonium limitation and the presence of excess iron (1, 19, 50, 61).Here, we have identified an evolutionarily conserved key regulator of the S. pombe dimorphic switch, the Asp1 protein. Asp1 belongs to the highly conserved family of Vip1 1/3 inositol polyphosphate kinases, which is one of two families that can generate inositol pyrophosphates (PP) (17, 23, 42, 54). The inositol polyphosphate kinase IP6K family, of which the S. cerevisiae Kcs1 protein is a member, is the “classical” family that can phosphorylate inositol hexakisphosphate (IP₆) (70, 71). These enzymes generate a specific PP-IP₅ (IP₇), which has the pyrophosphate at position 5 of the inositol ring (20, 54). The Vip1 family kinase activity was unmasked in an S. cerevisiae strain with KCS1 and DDP1 deleted (54, 83). The latter gene encodes a nudix hydrolase (14, 68). The mammalian and S. cerevisiae Vip1 proteins phosphorylate the 1/3 position of the inositol ring, generating 1/3 diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate (42). Both enzyme families collaborate to generate IP₈ (17, 23, 42, 54, 57).Two modes of action have been described for the high-energy moiety containing inositol pyrophosphates. First, these molecules can phosphorylate proteins by a nonenzymatic transfer of a phosphate group to specific prephosphorylated serine residues (2, 8, 69). Second, inositol pyrophosphates can regulate protein function by reversible binding to the S. cerevisiae Pho80-Pho85-Pho81 complex (39, 40). This cyclin-cyclin-dependent kinase complex is inactivated by inositol pyrophosphates generated by Vip1 when cells are starved of inorganic phosphate (39, 41, 42).Regulation of phosphate metabolism in S. cerevisiae is one of the few roles specifically attributed to a Vip1 kinase. Further information about the cellular function of this family came from the identification of the S. pombe Vip1 family member Asp1 as a regulator of the actin nucleator Arp2/3 complex (22). The 106-kDa Asp1 cytoplasmic protein, which probably exists as a dimer in vivo, acts as a multicopy suppressor of arp3-c1 mutants (22). Loss of Asp1 results in abnormal cell morphology, defects in polarized growth, and aberrant cortical actin cytoskeleton organization (22).The Vip1 family proteins have a dual domain structure which consists of an N-terminal “rimK”/ATP-grasp superfamily domain found in certain inositol signaling kinases and a C-terminal part with homology to histidine acid phosphatases present in phytase enzymes (28, 53, 54). The N-terminal domain is required and sufficient for Vip1 family kinase activity, and an Asp1 variant with a mutation in a catalytic residue of the kinase domain is unable to suppress mutants of the Arp2/3 complex (17, 23, 54). To date, no function has been described for the C-terminal phosphatase domain, and this domain appears to be catalytically inactive (17, 23, 54).Here we describe a new and conserved role for Vip1 kinases in regulating the dimorphic switch in yeasts. Asp1 kinase activity is essential for cell-cell and cell-substrate adhesion and the ability of S. pombe cells to grow invasively. Interestingly, Asp1 kinase activity is counteracted by the putative phosphatase domain of this protein, a finding that allows us to describe for the first time a function for the C-terminal part of Vip1 proteins.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Regulation of IRSp53-Dependent Filopodial Dynamics by Antagonism between 14-3-3 Binding and SH3-Mediated Localization

Filopodia are dynamic structures found at the leading edges of most migrating cells. IRSp53 plays a role in filopodium dynamics by coupling actin elongation with membrane protrusion. IRSp53 is a Cdc42 effector protein that contains an N-terminal inverse-BAR (Bin-amphipysin-Rvs) domain (IRSp53/MIM homology domain [IMD]) and an internal SH3 domain that associates with actin regulatory proteins, including Eps8. We demonstrate that the SH3 domain functions to localize IRSp53 to lamellipodia and that IRSp53 mutated in its SH3 domain fails to induce filopodia. Through SH3 domain-swapping experiments, we show that the related IRTKS SH3 domain is not functional in lamellipodial localization. IRSp53 binds to 14-3-3 after phosphorylation in a region that lies between the CRIB and SH3 domains. This association inhibits binding of the IRSp53 SH3 domain to proteins such as WAVE2 and Eps8 and also prevents Cdc42-GTP interaction. The antagonism is achieved by phosphorylation of two related 14-3-3 binding sites at T340 and T360. In the absence of phosphorylation at these sites, filopodium lifetimes in cells expressing exogenous IRSp53 are extended. Our work does not conform to current views that the inverse-BAR domain or Cdc42 controls IRSp53 localization but provides an alternative model of how IRSp53 is recruited (and released) to carry out its functions at lamellipodia and filopodia.The ability of a cell to rapidly respond to extracellular cues and direct cytoskeletal rearrangements is dependent on an array of signaling complexes that control actin assembly (58). The protrusive structures at the leading edges of motile cells are broadly defined as lamellipodia or filopodia (14). Lamellae are sheet-like protrusions composed of dendritic actin arrays that drive membrane expansion, with the “lamellipodium” representing a narrow region at the edge of the cell (in culture) characterized by rapid actin polymerization. This F-actin assembly is suggested to require Arp2/3 activity that nucleates new actin filaments from the sides of existing ones (58, 71) and capping proteins that limit the length of these new filaments and stabilize them (7). Arp2/3 activity in turn is regulated by the WASP/WAVE family of proteins, such as N-WASP and WAVE2 (68), whose regulation is a subject of intense interest (12, 29, 36, 41, 56, 76).Filopodia contain parallel bundles of actin filaments containing fascin (22). These are dynamic structures that emanate from the periphery of the cell and are retracted, with occasional attachment (to the dish in culture). Thus, they have been thought to have a sensory or exploratory role during cell migration (28). This is the case for neuronal growth cones, where filopodia sense attractant or repulsive cues and dictate direction in axonal path finding (9, 17, 25, 35). Filopodia have been shown to be important in the context of dendritic-spine development (64, 77), epithelial-sheet closure (26, 60, 79), and cell invasion/metastasis (80, 83).Lamellipodia have been well characterized since the pioneering work of Abercrombie et al. in the early 1970s (2, 3, 4). Filopodia require symmetry breaking at the leading edge (initiation), followed by elongation driven by a filopodial-tip protein complex (14, 28). A few proteins have been identified in this complex; Mena/Vasp serve to prevent capping at the barbed ends of bundled actin filaments (7, 53), and Dia2 promotes F-actin elongation (57, 85). Termination of filopodial elongation is not understood but nonetheless is likely to be tightly regulated. In the absence of F-actin elongation, retraction of the filopodium takes place by a rearward flow of F-actin and filament depolymerization (22).IRSp53 is in a position to play a pivotal role in generating filopodia; this brain-enriched protein was discovered as a substrate of the insulin receptor (87). Subsequently, IRSp53 was identified as an effector for Rac1 (50) and Cdc42 (27, 38), where it participates in filopodium and lamellipodium production (38, 51, 54, 86), neurite extension (27), dendritic-spine morphogenesis (1, 15, 66, 67), cell motility and invasiveness (24). The N terminus of IRSp53 contains a conserved helical domain that is found in five different gene products and is referred to as the IRSp53/MIM homology domain (IMD) (51, 70). This domain has been postulated to bind to Rac1 (50, 70) in a nucleotide-independent manner (52), but no convincing effector-like region has been identified. A Cdc42-specific CRIB-like sequence that does not bind Rac1 (27, 38) allows coupling of this and perhaps related Rho GTPases. The structure of the IMD reveals a zeppelin-shaped dimer that could bind “bent” membranes; thus, its potential as an F-actin-bundling domain (51, 82) could be an in vitro artifact often attributed to proteins with basic patches (46). Although there are reports of F-actin binding at physiological ionic strength (ca. 100 mM KCl) (82, 19), this region when expressed in isolation does not decorate F-actin in vivo.Two reports showed the IMD to be an “inverse-BAR” domain. BAR (Bin-amphipysin-Rvs) domains are found in proteins involved in endocytic trafficking, such as amphipysin and endophilin, and stabilize positively bent membranes, such as those on endocytic vesicles (31, 47). The IMD domains of both IRSp53 (70) and MIM-B (46) associate with lipids and can induce tubulations of PI(3,4,5)P₃ or PI(4,5)P₂-rich membranes, respectively. These tubulations are equivalent to membrane protrusions and are also referred to as negatively bent membranes. Ectopic expression of the IMD from IRSp53 (51, 70, 82, 86) or two other family members, MIM-B (11, 46) and IRTKS (52), can give rise to cells with many peripheral extensions. MIM-B is said to stimulate lamellipodia (11), while IRTKS generates “short actin clusters” at the cell periphery (52).In IRSp53 is a CRIB-like motif that mediates binding to Cdc42 (27, 38), but the function of this interaction in unclear. Cdc42 could relieve IRSp53 autoinhibition as described for N-Wasp (38), but there is little evidence for this. It has been suggested that Cdc42 controls IRSp53 localization and actin remodeling (27, 38), but another study indicated that these events are Cdc42 independent (19). IRSp53 contains a central SH3 domain that may bind proline-rich proteins, such as Dia1 (23), Mena (38), WAVE2 (49, 50, 69), and Eps8 (19, 24). However, it seems unlikely that all of these represent bona fide partners, and side-by-side comparison is provided in this study. Mena is involved in filopodium production (37), Dia1 in stress fiber formation (81), and WAVE2 in lamellipodium extension (72). Thus, Mena is a better candidate as a partner for IRSp53-mediated filopodia than Dia1 or WAVE2.There is good evidence for IRSp53 as a cellular partner for Eps8 (19). Eps8 is an adaptor protein containing an N-terminal PTB domain that can associate with receptor tyrosine kinases (65), and perhaps β integrins (13), and a C-terminal SH3 domain that can associate with Abi1 (30). Binding of the general adaptor Abi1 appears to positively regulate the actin-capping domain at the C terminus of Eps8 (18). It has been suggested that IRSp53 and Eps8 as a complex regulate cell motility, and perhaps Rac1 activation, via SOS (24); more recently, their roles in filopodium formation have been addressed (19). The involvement of IRSp53, but not MIM-B or IRTKS, in filopodium formation might be related to its role as a Cdc42 effector. We show here that, surprisingly, the CRIB motif is not essential for this activity, but rather, the ability of IRSp53 to associate via its SH3 domain is required, and that this domain is controlled by 14-3-3 binding.We have focused on the regulation of Cdc42 effectors that bind 14-3-3, including IRSp53 and PAK4, which are found as 14-3-3 targets in various proteomic projects (32, 44). In this study, we characterize the binding of 14-3-3 to IRSp53 and uncover how this activity regulates IRSp53 function. The phosphorylation-dependent 14-3-3 binding is GSK3β dependent, and 14-3-3 blocks the accessibility of both the CRIB and SH3 domains of IRSp53, thus indicating its primary function in controlling IRSp53 partners. This regulation of the SH3 domain by 14-3-3 is critical in the proper localization and termination of IRSp53 function to promote filopodium dynamics.     

Analysis of the Viral Elements Required in the Nuclear Import of HIV-1 DNA

HIV-1 possesses an exquisite ability to infect cells independently from their cycling status by undergoing an active phase of nuclear import through the nuclear pore. This property has been ascribed to the presence of karyophilic elements present in viral nucleoprotein complexes, such as the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a cis-acting structure present in the newly synthesized DNA, the DNA flap. However, their role in nuclear import remains controversial at best. In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the role of these elements in nuclear import in a comparison between several primary cell types, including stimulated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We show that despite the fact that none of these elements is absolutely required for nuclear import, disruption of the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS) clearly affects the kinetics of viral DNA entry into the nucleus. This effect is independent of the cell cycle status of the target cells and is observed in cycling as well as in nondividing primary cells, suggesting that nuclear import of viral DNA may occur similarly under both conditions. Nonetheless, this study indicates that other components are utilized along with the cPPT-CTS for an efficient entry of viral DNA into the nucleus.Lentiviruses display an exquisite ability to infect dividing and nondividing cells alike that is unequalled among Retroviridae. This property is thought to be due to the particular behavior or composition of the viral nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) that are liberated into the cytoplasm of target cells upon virus-to-cell membrane fusion and that allow lentiviruses to traverse an intact nuclear membrane (17, 28, 29, 39, 52, 55, 67, 79). In the case of the human immunodeficiency type I virus (HIV-1), several studies over the years identified viral components of such structures with intrinsic karyophilic properties and thus perfect candidates for mediation of the passage of viral DNA (vDNA) through the nuclear pore: the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a three-stranded DNA flap, a structure present in neo-synthesized viral DNA, specified by the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS). It is clear that these elements may mediate nuclear import directly or via the recruitment of the host''s proteins, and indeed, several cellular proteins have been found to influence HIV-1 infection during nuclear import, like the karyopherin α2 Rch1 (38); importin 7 (3, 30, 93); the transportin SR-2 (13, 20); or the nucleoporins Nup98 (27), Nup358/RANBP2, and Nup153 (13, 56).More recently, the capsid protein (CA), the main structural component of viral nucleoprotein complexes at least upon their cytoplasmic entry, has also been suggested to be involved in nuclear import or in postnuclear entry steps (14, 25, 74, 90, 92). Whether this is due to a role for CA in the shaping of viral nucleoprotein complexes or to a direct interaction between CA and proteins involved in nuclear import remains at present unknown.Despite a large number of reports, no single viral or cellular element has been described as absolutely necessary or sufficient to mediate lentiviral nuclear import, and important controversies as to the experimental evidences linking these elements to this step exist. For example, MA was among the first viral protein of HIV-1 described to be involved in nuclear import, and 2 transferable nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been described to occur at its N and C termini (40). However, despite the fact that early studies indicated that the mutation of these NLSs perturbed HIV-1 nuclear import and infection specifically in nondividing cells, such as macrophages (86), these findings failed to be confirmed in more-recent studies (23, 33, 34, 57, 65, 75).Similarly, Vpr has been implicated by several studies of the nuclear import of HIV-1 DNA (1, 10, 21, 43, 45, 47, 64, 69, 72, 73, 85). Vpr does not possess classical NLSs, yet it displays a transferable nucleophilic activity when fused to heterologous proteins (49-51, 53, 77, 81) and has been shown to line onto the nuclear envelope (32, 36, 47, 51, 58), where it can truly facilitate the passage of the viral genome into the nucleus. However, the role of Vpr in this step remains controversial, as in some instances Vpr is not even required for viral replication in nondividing cells (1, 59).Conflicting results concerning the role of IN during HIV-1 nuclear import also exist. Indeed, several transferable NLSs have been described to occur in the catalytic core and the C-terminal DNA binding domains of IN, but for some of these, initial reports of nuclear entry defects (2, 9, 22, 46, 71) were later shown to result from defects at steps other than nuclear import (60, 62, 70, 83). These reports do not exclude a role for the remaining NLSs in IN during nuclear import, and they do not exclude the possibility that IN may mediate this step by associating with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as importin alpha and beta (41), importin 7 (3, 30, 93, 98), and, more recently, transportin-SR2 (20).The central DNA flap, a structure present in lentiviruses and in at least 1 yeast retroelement (44), but not in other orthoretroviruses, has also been involved in the nuclear import of viral DNA (4, 6, 7, 31, 78, 84, 95, 96), and more recently, it has been proposed to provide a signal for viral nucleoprotein complexes uncoating in the proximity of the nuclear pore, with the consequence of providing a signal for import (8). However, various studies showed an absence or weakness of nuclear entry defects in viruses devoid of the DNA flap (24, 26, 44, 61).Overall, the importance of viral factors in HIV-1 nuclear import is still unclear. The discrepancies concerning the role of MA, IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS in HIV-1 nuclear import could in part be explained by their possible redundancy. To date, only one comprehensive study analyzed the role of these four viral potentially karyophilic elements together (91). This study showed that an HIV-1 chimera where these elements were either deleted or replaced by their murine leukemia virus (MLV) counterparts was, in spite of an important infectivity defect, still able to infect cycling and cell cycle-arrested cell lines to similar efficiencies. If this result indicated that the examined viral elements of HIV-1 were dispensable for the cell cycle independence of HIV, as infections proceeded equally in cycling and arrested cells, they did not prove that they were not required in nuclear import, because chimeras displayed a severe infectivity defect that precluded their comparison with the wild type (WT).Nuclear import and cell cycle independence may not be as simply linked as previously thought. On the one hand, there has been no formal demonstration that the passage through the nuclear pore, and thus nuclear import, is restricted to nondividing cells, and for what we know, this passage may be an obligatory step in HIV infection in all cells, irrespective of their cycling status. In support of this possibility, certain mutations in viral elements of HIV affect nuclear import in dividing as well as in nondividing cells (4, 6, 7, 31, 84, 95). On the other hand, cell cycle-independent infection may be a complex phenomenon that is made possible not only by the ability of viral DNA to traverse the nuclear membrane but also by its ability to cope with pre- and postnuclear entry events, as suggested by the phenotypes of certain CA mutants (74, 92).Given that the cellular environment plays an important role during the early steps of viral infection, we chose to analyze the role of the four karyophilic viral elements of HIV-1 during infection either alone or combined in a wide comparison between cells highly susceptible to infection and more-restrictive primary cell targets of HIV-1 in vivo, such as primary blood lymphocytes (PBLs), monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), and dendritic cells (DCs).In this study, we show that an HIV-1-derived virus in which the 2 NLSs of MA are mutated and the IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS elements are removed displays no detectable nuclear import defect in HeLa cells independently of their cycling status. However, this mutant virus is partially impaired for nuclear entry in primary cells and more specifically in DCs and PBLs. We found that this partial defect is specified by the cPPT-CTS, while the 3 remaining elements seem to play no role in nuclear import. Thus, our study indicates that the central DNA flap specifies the most important role among the viral elements involved thus far in nuclear import. However, it also clearly indicates that the role played by the central DNA flap is not absolute and that its importance varies depending on the cell type, independently from the dividing status of the cell.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.