Mechanism of E1-E2 Interaction for the Inhibition of Ubl Adenylation

Conjugates of ubiquitin or its homologues to other proteins occur by strictly ordered steps with ordered addition of substrates for each step. High concentrations of E2 were shown to inhibit the formation of E2∼Ubl thioester and Ubl∼target conjugates. We investigated the mechanism of such inhibitory effect of the SUMO E2 and whether the E2 has two binding sites on its E1, one for the inhibitory effect and one for productive SUMOylation. NMR methods in combination with mutagenesis and biochemical assays revealed that Ubc9 binds to two flexible domains of its free E1 simultaneously, suggesting extensive domain movements in the free E1. Further, interaction of free E1 and E2 inhibits SUMO adenylation, and the interfaces responsible for the inhibition were the same as those required for productive transfer of SUMO from E1 to E2. This study indicates a conformational flexibility-dependent mechanism to control the strictly ordered steps in Ubl modifications.     

Sumoylation of the GTPase Ran by the RanBP2 SUMO E3 Ligase Complex

The SUMO E3 ligase complex RanBP2/RanGAP1*SUMO1/Ubc9 localizes at cytoplasmic nuclear pore complex (NPC) filaments and is a docking site in nucleocytoplasmic transport. RanBP2 has four Ran binding domains (RBDs), two of which flank RanBP2''s E3 ligase region. We thus wondered whether the small GTPase Ran is a target for RanBP2-dependent sumoylation. Indeed, Ran is sumoylated both by a reconstituted and the endogenous RanBP2 complex in semi-permeabilized cells. Generic inhibition of SUMO isopeptidases or depletion of the SUMO isopeptidase SENP1 enhances sumoylation of Ran in semi-permeabilized cells. As Ran is typically associated with transport receptors, we tested the influence of Crm1, Imp β, Transportin, and NTF2 on Ran sumoylation. Surprisingly, all inhibited Ran sumoylation. Mapping Ran sumoylation sites revealed that transport receptors may simply block access of the E2-conjugating enzyme Ubc9, however the acceptor lysines are perfectly accessible in Ran/NTF2 complexes. Isothermal titration calorimetry revealed that NTF2 prevents sumoylation by reducing RanGDP''s affinity to RanBP2''s RBDs to undetectable levels. Taken together, our findings indicate that RanGDP and not RanGTP is the physiological target for the RanBP2 SUMO E3 ligase complex. Recognition requires interaction of Ran with RanBP2''s RBDs, which is prevented by the transport factor NTF2.     

A Mechanistic View of the Role of E3 in Sumoylation

Sumoylation, the covalent attachment of SUMO (Small Ubiquitin-Like Modifier) to proteins, differs from other Ubl (Ubiquitin-like) pathways. In sumoylation, E2 ligase Ubc9 can function without E3 enzymes, albeit with lower reaction efficiency. Here, we study the mechanism through which E3 ligase RanBP2 triggers target recognition and catalysis by E2 Ubc9. Two mechanisms were proposed for sumoylation. While in both the first step involves Ubc9 conjugation to SUMO, the subsequent sequence of events differs: in the first E2-SUMO forms a complex with the target and E3, followed by SUMO transfer to the target. In the second, Ubc9-SUMO binds to the target and facilitates SUMO transfer without E3. Using dynamic correlations obtained from explicit solvent molecular dynamic simulations we illustrate the key roles played by allostery in both mechanisms. Pre-existence of conformational states explains the experimental observations that sumoylation can occur without E3, even though at a reduced rate. Furthermore, we propose a mechanism for enhancement of sumoylation by E3. Analysis of the conformational ensembles of the complex of E2 conjugated to SUMO illustrates that the E2 enzyme is already largely pre-organized for target binding and catalysis; E3 binding shifts the equilibrium and enhances these pre-existing populations. We further observe that E3 binding regulates allosterically the key residues in E2, Ubc9 Asp100/Lys101 E2, for the target recognition.     

E2-mediated Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier (SUMO) Modification of Thymine DNA Glycosylase Is Efficient but Not Selective for the Enzyme-Product Complex

Thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) initiates the repair of G·T mismatches that arise by deamination of 5-methylcytosine (mC), and it excises 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine, oxidized forms of mC. TDG functions in active DNA demethylation and is essential for embryonic development. TDG forms a tight enzyme-product complex with abasic DNA, which severely impedes enzymatic turnover. Modification of TDG by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) proteins weakens its binding to abasic DNA. It was proposed that sumoylation of product-bound TDG regulates product release, with SUMO conjugation and deconjugation needed for each catalytic cycle, but this model remains unsubstantiated. We examined the efficiency and specificity of TDG sumoylation using in vitro assays with purified E1 and E2 enzymes, finding that TDG is modified efficiently by SUMO-1 and SUMO-2. Remarkably, we observed similar modification rates for free TDG and TDG bound to abasic or undamaged DNA. To examine the conjugation step directly, we determined modification rates (k_obs) using preformed E2∼SUMO-1 thioester. The hyperbolic dependence of k_obs on TDG concentration gives k_max = 1.6 min⁻¹ and K_1/2 = 0.55 μm, suggesting that E2∼SUMO-1 has higher affinity for TDG than for the SUMO targets RanGAP1 and p53 (peptide). Whereas sumoylation substantially weakens TDG binding to DNA, TDG∼SUMO-1 still binds relatively tightly to AP-DNA (K_d ∼50 nm). Although E2∼SUMO-1 exhibits no specificity for product-bound TDG, the relatively high conjugation efficiency raises the possibility that E2-mediated sumoylation could stimulate product release in vivo. This and other implications for the biological role and mechanism of TDG sumoylation are discussed.     

UFDS系统检测蛋白质SUMO化修饰研究

为了验证UFDS系统（Ubc9 fusion-directed sumoylation, UFDS）是否能够检测蛋白质SUMO(small ubiquitin-related modifier)化修饰,构建了Ubc9和PKCθ的融合表达载体,与SUMO1表达载体共转染293T细胞,通过免疫共沉淀和Western印迹检测Ubc9-PKCθ与SUMO1的相互作用。 结果表明,Ubc9-PKCθ与SUMO1相互作用,且SENP1共表达时导致Ubc9-PKCθ去SUMO化修饰;相较于野生型Ubc9-PKCθ,SUMO化修饰位点突变型Ubc9-PKCθ与SUMO1的相互作用显著减弱;而相较于野生型PKCθ,SUMO化修饰位点突变型PKCθ与SUMO1的相互作用则完全检测不到。 研究结果说明,应用UFDS系统能检测蛋白质的SUMO化修饰,但在鉴定潜在的SUMO化修饰位点时有一定的缺陷。     

Systematic determinations of SUMOylation activation intermediates and dynamics by a sensitive and quantitative FRET assay

Ubiquitination and SUMOylation are multi-step cascade reactions, in which small protein modifiers are activated by E1 activating enzyme, transferred to E2 conjugating enzyme, and conjugated to substrates mediated by the E3 ligase in vivo. The structural and biochemical bases for the cascade reactions have been elucidated by several studies. However, the reaction intermediates and dynamics of these peptide modifiers among the enzymes have not been completely elucidated. Here we report detailed investigations of SUMOylation dynamics and interaction switches of SUMO1 among its ligases using FRET technology. These studies show that, while SUMO1 and the E1 subunit Aos1 or Uba2 have no intrinsic affinity for each other, the adenylation of SUMO1 carried out by Aos1 requires the presence of Uba2, and subsequently conformational changes trigger the interaction of SUMO1 and Uba2 for a thioester bond formation. The reaction intermediates among SUMO1 and its ligases are indirectly revealed by FRET signals generated by each pair. Furthermore, the transfer of SUMO1 from Uba2 to E2 enzyme, Ubc9, depends on the formation of a thioester bond between SUMO1 and Ubc9, and requires non-covalent interaction between Ubc9 and Uba2, but not between Ubc9 and SUMO1. These interaction switches provide the physical and biochemical bases for the SUMO activation and a transfer cascade required for SUMO activation.     

Ubc9 acetylation modulates distinct SUMO target modification and hypoxia response

While numerous small ubiquitin‐like modifier (SUMO) conjugated substrates have been identified, very little is known about the cellular signalling mechanisms that differentially regulate substrate sumoylation. Here, we show that acetylation of SUMO E2 conjugase Ubc9 selectively downregulates the sumoylation of substrates with negatively charged amino acid‐dependent sumoylation motif (NDSM) consisting of clustered acidic residues located downstream from the core ψ‐K‐X‐E/D consensus motif, such as CBP and Elk‐1, but not substrates with core ψ‐K‐X‐E/D motif alone or SUMO‐interacting motif. Ubc9 is acetylated at residue K65 and K65 acetylation attenuates Ubc9 binding to NDSM substrates, causing a reduction in NDSM substrate sumoylation. Furthermore, Ubc9 K65 acetylation can be downregulated by hypoxia via SIRT1, and is correlated with hypoxia‐elicited modulation of sumoylation and target gene expression of CBP and Elk‐1 and cell survival. Our data suggest that Ubc9 acetylation/deacetylation serves as a dynamic switch for NDSM substrate sumoylation and we report a previously undescribed SIRT1/Ubc9 regulatory axis in the modulation of protein sumoylation and the hypoxia response.     

DNA repair and global sumoylation are regulated by distinct Ubc9 noncovalent complexes

Global sumoylation, SUMO chain formation, and genome stabilization are all outputs generated by a limited repertoire of enzymes. Mechanisms driving selectivity for each of these processes are largely uncharacterized. Here, through crystallographic analyses we show that the SUMO E2 Ubc9 forms a noncovalent complex with a SUMO-like domain of Rad60 (SLD2). Ubc9:SLD2 and Ubc9:SUMO noncovalent complexes are structurally analogous, suggesting that differential recruitment of Ubc9 by SUMO or Rad60 provides a novel means for such selectivity. Indeed, deconvoluting Ubc9 function by disrupting either the Ubc9:SLD2 or Ubc9:SUMO noncovalent complex reveals distinct roles in facilitating sumoylation. Ubc9:SLD2 acts in the Nse2 SUMO E3 ligase-dependent pathway for DNA repair, whereas Ubc9:SUMO instead promotes global sumoylation and chain formation, via the Pli1 E3 SUMO ligase. Moreover, this Pli1-dependent SUMO chain formation causes the genome instability phenotypes of SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase (STUbL) mutants. Overall, we determine that, unexpectedly, Ubc9 noncovalent partner choice dictates the role of sumoylation in distinct cellular pathways.     

Versatile Recombinant SUMOylation System for the Production of SUMO-Modified Protein

Posttranslational modification by small ubiquitin-like modifiers (SUMO) is being associated with a growing number of regulatory functions in diverse cellular processes. The biochemical investigation into the underlying molecular mechanisms, however, has been lagging behind due to the difficulty to generate sufficient amounts of recombinant SUMOylated proteins. Here, we present two newly designed two-component vector systems for the expression and purification of SUMO-modified target proteins in Escherichia coli. One system consists of a vector for SUMO conjugation, expressing human SUMO-activating (SAE1/SAE2) and conjugating (Ubc9) enzymes together with His₆-tagged SUMO1, 2 or 3, that can be combined with commonly used expression constructs for any gene of interest. To facilitate SUMOylation of targets normally requiring a SUMO-E3 ligase for efficient modification, a second system is designed to express the target protein as a fusion with the human SUMO-conjugating enzyme Ubc9, thus compensating the absence of a potential SUMO ligase. We demonstrate the proficiency of these systems by SUMOylation of two DNA repair proteins, the thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) and XRCC1, and describe purification schemes for SUMOylated proteins in native and active form. This SUMO toolbox facilitates “in-cell” and “in-extract” production and purification of recombinant SUMO-modified target proteins for functional and structural analysis.     

Unique binding interactions among Ubc9, SUMO and RanBP2 reveal a mechanism for SUMO paralog selection

The conjugation of small ubiquitin-like modifiers SUMO-1, SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 onto target proteins requires the concerted action of the specific E1-activating enzyme SAE1/SAE2, the E2-conjugating enzyme Ubc9, and an E3-like SUMO ligase. NMR chemical shift perturbation was used to identify the surface of Ubc9 that interacts with the SUMO ligase RanBP2. Unlike known ubiquitin E2-E3 interactions, RanBP2 binds to the beta-sheet of Ubc9. Mutational disruption of Ubc9-RanBP2 binding affected SUMO-2 but not SUMO-1 conjugation to Sp100 and to a newly identified RanBP2 substrate, PML. RanBP2 contains a binding site specific for SUMO-1 but not SUMO-2, indicating that a Ubc9-SUMO-1 thioester could be recruited to RanBP2 via SUMO-1 in the absence of strong binding between Ubc9 and RanBP2. Thus we show that E2-E3 interactions are not conserved across the ubiquitin-like protein superfamily and identify a RanBP2-dependent mechanism for SUMO paralog-specific conjugation.     

Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) modification of E1 Cys domain inhibits E1 Cys domain enzymatic activity

Although it is well established that ubiquitin-like modifications are tightly regulated, it has been unclear how their E1 activities are controlled. In this study, we found that the SAE2 subunit of the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) E1 is autoSUMOylated at residue Lys-236, and SUMOylation was catalyzed by Ubc9 at several additional Lys residues surrounding the catalytic Cys-173 of SAE2. AutoSUMOylation of SAE2 did not affect SUMO adenylation or formation of E1·SUMO thioester, but did significantly inhibit the transfer of SUMO from E1 to E2 and overall SUMO conjugations to target proteins due to the altered interaction between E1 and E2. Upon heat shock, SUMOylation of SAE2 was reduced, which corresponded with an increase in global SUMOylation, suggesting that SUMOylation of the Cys domain of SAE2 is a mechanism for "storing" a pool of E1 that can be quickly activated in response to environmental changes. This study is the first to show how E1 activity is controlled by post-translational modifications, and similar regulation likely exists across the homologous E1s of ubiquitin-like modifications.     

RWD Domain as an E2 (Ubc9)-Interaction Module

An RWD domain is a well conserved domain found through bioinformatic analysis of the human proteome sequence; however, its function has been unknown. Ubiquitin-like modifications require the catalysis of three enzymes generally known as E1, E2, and E3. We solved the crystal structure of the E2 for the small ubiquitin-like modifiers (SUMO) in complex with an RWD domain and confirmed the structure using solution NMR analysis. The binding surface of RWD on Ubc9 is located near the N terminus of Ubc9 that is known to be involved in noncovalent binding of the proteins in the conjugation machinery, including a domain of E1, SUMO, and an E3 ligase. NMR data indicate that the RWD domain does not bind to SUMO and E1. The interaction between RWD and Ubc9 has a K_d of 32 ± 4 μm. Consistent with the structure and binding affinity and in contrast to a previous report, the RWD domain and RWDD3 have minimal effects on global SUMOylation. The structural and biochemical information presented here forms the basis for further investigation of the functions of RWD-containing proteins.     

Structure and analysis of a complex between SUMO and Ubc9 illustrates features of a conserved E2-Ubl interaction

The SUMO E2 Ubc9 serves as a lynchpin in the SUMO conjugation pathway, interacting with the SUMO E1 during activation, with thioester linked SUMO after E1 transfer and with the substrate and SUMO E3 ligases during conjugation. Here, we describe the structure determination of a non-covalent complex between human Ubc9 and SUMO-1 at 2.4 A resolution. Non-covalent interactions between Ubc9 and SUMO are conserved in human and yeast insomuch as human Ubc9 interacts with each of the human SUMO isoforms, and yeast Ubc9 interacts with Smt3, the yeast SUMO ortholog. Structural comparisons reveal similarities to several other non-covalent complexes in the ubiquitin pathway, suggesting that the non-covalent Ubc9-SUMO interface may be important for poly-SUMO chain formation, for E2 recruitment to SUMO conjugated substrates, or for mediating E2 interactions with either E1 or E3 ligases. Biochemical analysis suggests that this surface is less important for E1 activation or di-SUMO-2 formation, but more important for E3 interactions and for poly-SUMO chain formation when the chain exceeds more than two SUMO proteins.     

Sumoylation modulates the assembly and activity of the pre-mRNA 3' processing complex

Eukaryotic pre-mRNA 3′-end formation is catalyzed by a complex set of factors that must be intricately regulated. In this study, we have discovered a novel role for the small ubiquitin-like modifier SUMO in the regulation of mammalian 3′-end processing. We identified symplekin, a factor involved in complex assembly, and CPSF-73, an endonuclease, as SUMO modification substrates. The major sites of sumoylation in symplekin and CPSF-73 were determined and found to be highly conserved across species. A sumoylation-deficient mutant was defective in rescuing cell viability in symplekin small interfering RNA (siRNA)-treated cells, supporting the importance of this modification in symplekin function. We also analyzed the involvement of sumoylation in 3′-end processing by altering the sumoylation status of nuclear extracts. This was done by the addition of a SUMO protease, which we show interacts with both symplekin and CPSF-73, or by siRNA-mediated depletion of ubc9, the SUMO E2-conjugating enzyme. Both treatments resulted in a marked inhibition of processing. The assembly of a functional polyadenylation complex was also impaired by the SUMO protease. Our identification of two key polyadenylation factors as SUMO targets and of the role of SUMO in enhancing the assembly and activity of the 3′-end-processing complex together reveal an important function for SUMO in the processing of mRNA precursors.     

Noncovalent interaction between Ubc9 and SUMO promotes SUMO chain formation

The ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO regulates a wide range of cellular processes by post-translational modification with one, or a chain of SUMO molecules. Sumoylation is achieved by the sequential action of several enzymes in which the E2, Ubc9, transfers SUMO from the E1 to the target mostly with the help of an E3 enzyme. In this process, Ubc9 not only forms a thioester bond with SUMO, but also interacts with SUMO noncovalently. Here, we show that this noncovalent interaction promotes the formation of short SUMO chains on targets such as Sp100 and HDAC4. We present a crystal structure of the noncovalent Ubc9-SUMO1 complex, showing that SUMO is located far from the E2 active site and resembles the noncovalent interaction site for ubiquitin on UbcH5c and Mms2. Structural comparison suggests a model for poly-sumoylation involving a mechanism analogous to Mms2-Ubc13-mediated ubiquitin chain formation.     

Sumoylation of a meiosis-specific RecA homolog, Lim15/Dmc1, via interaction with the small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO)-conjugating enzyme Ubc9

Sumoylation is a post-translational modification system that covalently attaches the small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) to target proteins. Ubc9 is required as the E2-type enzyme for SUMO-1 conjugation to targets. Here, we show that Ubc9 interacts with the meiosis-specific RecA homolog, Lim15/Dmc1 in the basidiomycete Coprinus cinereus (CcLim15), and mediates sumoylation of CcLim15 during meiosis. In vitro protein-protein interaction assays revealed that CcUbc9 interacts with CcLim15 and binds to the C-terminus (amino acids 105-347) of CcLim15, which includes the ATPase domain. Immunocytochemistry demonstrates that CcUbc9 and CcLim15 colocalize in the nuclei from the leptotene stage to the early pachytene stage during meiotic prophase I. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicate that CcUbc9 interacts with CcLim15 in vivo during meiotic prophase I. Furthermore, we show that CcLim15 is a target protein of sumoylation both in vivo and in vitro, and identify the C-terminus (amino acids 105-347) of CcLim15 as the site of sumoylation in vitro. These results suggest that sumoylation is a candidate modulator of meiotic recombination via interaction between Ubc9 and Lim15/Dmc1.     

Sumoylation regulates EXO1 stability and processing of DNA damage

DNA double-strand break repair by the error-free pathway of homologous recombination (HR) requires the concerted action of several factors. Among these, EXO1 and DNA2/BLM are responsible for the extensive resection of DNA ends to produce 3′-overhangs, which are essential intermediates for downstream steps of HR. Here we show that EXO1 is a SUMO target and that sumoylation affects EXO1 ubiquitylation and protein stability. We identify an UBC9-PIAS1/PIAS4-dependent mechanism controlling human EXO1 sumoylation in vivo and demonstrate conservation of this mechanism in yeast by the Ubc9-Siz1/Siz2 using an in vitro reconstituted system. Furthermore, we show physical interaction between EXO1 and the de-sumoylating enzyme SENP6 both in vitro and in vivo, promoting EXO1 stability. Finally, we identify the major sites of sumoylation in EXO1 and show that ectopic expression of a sumoylation-deficient form of EXO1 rescues the DNA damage-induced chromosomal aberrations observed upon wt-EXO1 expression. Thus, our study identifies a novel layer of regulation of EXO1, making the pathways that regulate its function an ideal target for therapeutic intervention.