1,25-Dihyroxyvitamin D3 promotes FOXP3 expression via binding to vitamin D response elements in its conserved noncoding sequence region

FOXP3-positive regulatory T (Treg) cells are a unique subset of T cells with immune regulatory properties. Treg cells can be induced from non-Treg CD4(+) T cells (induced Treg [iTreg] cells) by TCR triggering, IL-2, and TGF-β or retinoic acid. 1,25-Dihyroxyvitamin D(3) [1,25(OH)(2)VD(3)] affects the functions of immune cells including T cells. 1,25(OH)(2)VD(3) binds the nuclear VD receptor (VDR) that binds target DNA sequences known as the VD response element (VDRE). Although 1,25(OH)(2)VD(3) can promote FOXP3 expression in CD4(+) T cells with TCR triggering and IL-2, it is unknown whether this effect of 1,25(OH)(2)VD(3) is mediated through direct binding of VDR to the FOXP3 gene without involving other molecules. Also, it is unclear whether FOXP3 expression in 1,25(OH)(2)VD(3)-induced Treg (VD-iTreg) cells is critical for the inhibitory function of these cells. In this study, we demonstrated the presence of VDREs in the intronic conserved noncoding sequence region +1714 to +2554 of the human FOXP3 gene and the enhancement of the FOXP3 promoter activity by such VDREs in response to 1,25(OH)(2)VD(3). Additionally, VD-iTreg cells suppressed the proliferation of target CD4(+) T cells and this activity was dependent on FOXP3 expression. These findings suggest that 1,25(OH)(2)VD(3) can affect human immune responses by regulating FOXP3 expression in CD4(+) T cells through direct VDR binding to the FOXP3 gene, which is essential for inhibitory function of VD-iTreg cells.     

Direct Repeat 3-Type Element Lacking the Ability to Bind to the Vitamin D Receptor Enhances the Function of a Vitamin D-responsive Element

In a previous study, we identified the element which allows the maximum response to 1,25(OH)₂D₃ in concert with two vitamin D-responsive elements (VDREs) in the rat 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ 24-hydroxylase gene promoter, and designated it an accessory element [Ohyama, Y., Ozono, K., Uchida, M., Yoshimura, M., Shinki, T., Suda, T. and Yamamoto, O. Functional assessment of two vitamin D-responsive elements in the rat 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ 24-hydroxylase gene. J. Biol. Chem., 1996, 271, 30381-30385]. The accessory element located adjacent to the proximal VDRE is not capable of binding to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), while its nucleotide sequence resembles the consensus sequence of VDREs, direct repeat 3 (DR3). To clarify the difference between the accessory element and VDREs, the function of the accessory element was compared with that of VDREs. The mutated accessory elements with a single nucleotide substitution showed the capability of binding to the VDR in vitro. However, these mutants still did not act as a VDRE when driven by the heterologous SV40 promoter. The accessory element did not enhance the function of a cAMP-responsive element. The corresponding site of the accessory element in the human 24-hydroxylase is a DR4-type element, and this element did not function as an accessory element. These results indicate that a critical nucleotide sequence is necessary for the binding to the VDR and for mediating the vitamin D effect, and suggest the different regulation between the rat and human 24-hydroxylase gene.     

Molecular mechanism underlying 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D regulation of nephrin gene expression

Nephrin plays a key role in maintaining the structure of the slit diaphragm in the glomerular filtration barrier. Our previous studies have demonstrated potent renoprotective activity for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)(2)D(3)). Here we showed that in podocytes 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) markedly stimulated nephrin mRNA and protein expression. ChIP scan of the 6-kb 5' upstream region of the mouse nephrin gene identified several putative vitamin D response elements (VDREs), and EMSA confirmed that the VDRE at -312 (a DR4-type VDRE) could be bound by vitamin D receptor (VDR)/retinoid X receptor. Luciferase reporter assays of the proximal nephrin promoter fragment (-427 to +173) showed strong induction of luciferase activity upon 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) treatment, and the induction was abolished by mutations within -312VDRE. ChIP assays showed that, upon 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) activation, VDR bound to this VDRE leading to recruitment of DRIP205 and RNA polymerase II and histone 4 acetylation. Treatment of mice with a vitamin D analog induced nephrin mRNA and protein in the kidney, accompanied by increased VDR binding to the -312VDRE and histone 4 acetylation. 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) reversed high glucose-induced nephrin reduction in podocytes, and vitamin D analogs prevented nephrin decline in both type 1 and 2 diabetic mice. Together these data demonstrate that 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) stimulates nephrin expression in podocytes by acting on a VDRE in the proximal nephrin promoter. Nephrin up-regulation likely accounts for part of the renoprotective activity of vitamin D.     

Loss of CYP3A7 gene induction by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 is caused by less binding of VDR to the proximal ER6 in CYP3A7 gene

Cytochrome P450 3A4 and 3A7 (CYP3A4 and CYP3A7, respectively) are predominant forms in the human adult and fetal liver, respectively. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1,25(OH)(2)D(3)) is known to be a potent inducer of CYP3A4 in human colon carcinoma Caco-2 via vitamin D receptor (VDR). However, whether CYP3A7 is inducible by 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) has not yet been elucidated. In the present study, we examined the effect of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) on CYP3A7 gene expression in Caco-2 cells, which express CYP3A4 and CYP3A7 mRNAs. 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) hardly induced the expression of CYP3A7 mRNA in contrast to the marked induction of CYP3A4 mRNA. Reporter assay using 5'-franking region CYP3A4 and CYP3A7 genes also revealed that 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) activates CYP3A4 promoter, but not CYP3A7 promoter, which has two mutations in the proximal ER6 site compared with CYP3A4 promoter. In addition, we found that the binding of VDR to the proximal ER6 in CYP3A7 gene was markedly less than that to the proximal ER6 in CYP3A4 gene using gel shift assay. Taken together, the decrease of VDR binding to the proximal ER6 caused by the mutation results in the loss of CYP3A7 gene activation by 1,25(OH)(2)D(3).     

DNA bending is induced by binding of vitamin D receptor-retinoid X receptor heterodimers to vitamin D response elements.

The ability of vitamin D receptor-retinoid X receptor (VDR-RXR) heterodimers to induce a DNA bend upon binding to various vitamin D response elements (VDRE) has been investigated by circular permutation and phasing analysis. Recombinant rat VDR expressed in the baculovirus system and purified recombinant human RXR beta have been used. The VDREs were from 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-[OH]2D3) enhanced genes (rat osteocalcin, rOC; mouse osteopontin, mOP, and rat 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-24-hydroxylase, r24-OHase), and a 1,25-(OH)2D3 repressed gene (human parathyroid hormone, hPTH). As shown by circular permutation analysis, VDR-RXR induced a distortion in DNA fragments containing various VDREs. Calculated distortion angles were similar in magnitude (57 degrees, 56 degrees, 61 degrees, and 59 degrees, respectively for rOC, mOP, r24-Ohase, and hPTH). The distortions took place with or without a 1,25-(OH)2D3 ligand. The centers of the apparent bend were found in the vicinity of the midpoint of all VDREs, except for rOC VDRE which was found 4 bp upstream. Phasing analysis was performed with DNA fragments containing mOP VDRE and revealed that VDR-RXR heterodimers induced a directed bend of 26 degrees, not influenced by the presence of hormone. In this study we report that similar to other members of the steroid and thyroid nuclear receptor superfamily, VDR-RXR heterodimers induce DNA bending.     

Analysis of the 5-lipoxygenase promoter and characterization of a vitamin D receptor binding site

1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1,25(OH)(2)D(3)) and transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) potently induce 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) in myeloid cells. We analyzed vitamin D receptor (VDR) binding to putative vitamin D response elements within the 5-LO promoter and analyzed its function by reporter gene analysis. Binding of VDR and retinoid X receptor to the promoter region was shown in DNase I footprinting, electrophoretic mobility shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. However, the identified VDR binding region did not mediate induction of reporter gene activity by 1,25(OH)(2)D(3)/TGFbeta, neither in the 5-LO promoter context nor with the thymidine kinase (tk) promoter. Insertion of the rat atrial natriuretic factor VDRE in reporter plasmids containing the 5-LO promoter diminished induction by 1,25(OH)(2)D(3)/TGFbeta as compared with the tk promoter. Similarly, low inductions were obtained when cells were transiently or stably transfected with constructs containing various 5-LO promoter regions. Concerning basal promoter activity, we identified a positive regulatory region (-779 to -229), which includes the VDR binding region, in 5-LO-positive MonoMac6 cells. In summary, the VDR/RXR complex binds to putative VDREs in the 5-LO promoter, but other sequences outside the 5-LO promoter seem to be responsible or additionally required for the prominent induction of 5-LO mRNA expression by 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) and TGFbeta.