The FLF MADS box gene: a repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and methylation

A MADS box gene, FLF (for FLOWERING LOCUS F ), isolated from a late-flowering, T-DNA-tagged Arabidopsis mutant, is a semidominant gene encoding a repressor of flowering. The FLF gene appears to integrate the vernalization-dependent and autonomous flowering pathways because its expression is regulated by genes in both pathways. The level of FLF mRNA is downregulated by vernalization and by a decrease in genomic DNA methylation, which is consistent with our previous suggestion that vernalization acts to induce flowering through changes in gene activity that are mediated through a reduction in DNA methylation. The flf-1 mutant requires a greater than normal amount of an exogenous gibberellin (GA3) to decrease flowering time compared with the wild type or with vernalization-responsive late-flowering mutants, suggesting that the FLF gene product may block the promotion of flowering by GAs. FLF maps to a region on chromosome 5 near the FLOWERING LOCUS C gene, which is a semidominant repressor of flowering in late-flowering ecotypes of Arabidopsis.     

Mapping loci controlling vernalization requirement and flowering time in Brassica napus

Rapeseed cultivars (Brassica napus L.) can be classified into annual and biennial groups according to their requirement for vernalization in order to induce flowering. The genetic control of these phenotypic differences is not well understood, but this information could be valuable for the design of breeding approaches to accelerate rapeseed improvement. In order to map loci controlling this variation, a doubled haploid population, derived from a cross between annual and biennial cultivars, was evaluated for vernalization requirement and days-to-flowering in a replicated field experiment using three treatments: no vernalization, 4 weeks of vernalization and 8 weeks of vernalization. A linkage map of 132 RFLP loci was used to locate loci controlling these traits. Marker segregation in one region of linkage group 9 was strongly associated with the annual/biennial growth habit in the unvernalized treatment and with days-to-flowering in all three treatments. Two other regions with smaller effects on days-to-flowering were also identified.     

Genome-wide identification of flowering time genes associated with vernalization and the regulatory flowering networks in Chinese cabbage

Flowering time (Ft) is the most important characteristic of Chinese cabbage with high leaf yields and late-flowering are favorable traits, while little knowledge on genes involved in Ft and the flowering mechanism in this crop. In this study, we conducted genome-wide RNA-seq analysis using an inbred Chinese cabbage ‘4004’ line in response to vernalization and compared the Ft gene expression with radish crop. A number of Ft genes which play roles in flowering pathways were performed quantitative RT-PCR analysis to verify the regulatory flowering gene network in Chinese cabbage. We found that a total of 223 Ft genes in Chinese cabbage, and 50 of these genes responded to vernalization. The majority of flowering enhancers were upregulated, whereas most flowering repressors were downregulated in response to vernalization as confirmed by RT-qPCR. Among the major Ft genes, the expression of BrCOL1-2, BrFT1/2, BrSOC1/2/3, BrFLC1/2/3/5, and BrMAF was strongly affected by vernalization. In reference to comparative RNA-seq profiling of Ft genes, Chinese cabbage and radish revealed substantially different vernalization response in particular GA flowering pathway. Thus, this study provides new insight into functional divergence in flowering pathways and the regulatory mechanisms in Brassicaceae crops. Further analysis of the major integrator genes between early and late-flowering inbred lines facilitates understanding flowering trait variation and molecular basis of flowering in Chinese cabbage.     

Experiencing winter for spring flowering: A molecular epigenetic perspective on vernalization

Many over-wintering plants, through vernalization, overcome a block to flowering and thus acquire competence to flower in the following spring after experiencing prolonged cold exposure or winter cold. The vernalization pathways in different angiosperm lineages appear to have convergently evolved to adapt to temperate climates. Molecular and epigenetic mechanisms for vernalization regulation have been well studied in the crucifer model plant Arabidopsis thaliana.Here, we review recent progresses on the vernalization pathway in Arabidopsis. In addition, we summarize current molecular and genetic understandings of vernalization regulation in temperate grasses including wheat and Brachypodium, two monocots from Pooideae, followed by a brief discussion on divergence of the vernalization pathways between Brassicaceae and Pooideae.     

Fackel interacts with gibberellic acid signaling and vernalization to mediate flowering in Arabidopsis

Planta - Fackel (FK) is involved in the flowering of Arabidopsis mainly via the gibberellin pathway and vernalization pathway. This new function of FK is partially dependent on the FLOWERING LOCUS...     

The effect of day length, vernalization and DNA demethylation on the flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana

We studied the effect of three factors on the induction of flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana , i.e. vernalization, day length and DNA demethylation. Seven natural late flowering genotypes and 13 late flowering mutants were used in the experiments. The effect of the vernalization and the short day (SD) was uniform in all genotypes used, resulting in shortening (vernalization) or extension of the period before the appearance of the first flower primordia. On the other hand, the effect of the demethylating agent (5-azacytidine [5-azaC]) was not uniform in the genotypes used. In all natural late genotypes (except Lu-1 ), the shortening of the flowering time (FT) after 5-azaC treatment was observed. On the contrary, only five mutants – dl , pm , M63 , M73 and fca-1 – showed a shortening of the FT, while in the majority of the late flowering mutants, no significant response (earlier flowering) was found. The different response to the vernalization and demethylation treatment in late flowering mutants shows the possibility of two different pathways leading to the flowering, both of which are regulated by DNA demethylation. The different response of natural and induced late flowering genotypes after 5-azaC treatment shows that genes that play a role in flower development are of a different nature.     

Photoperiodic control of flowering: not only by coincidence

The timing of floral transition has a direct impact on reproductive success. One of the most important environmental factors that affect the transition is the change in day length (photoperiod). Classical experiments imply that plants monitor photoperiods in the leaf, and transmit that information coded within an elusive signal dubbed florigen to the apex to reprogram development. Recent advances in Arabidopsis research indicate that the core of the day-length measurement mechanism lies in the circadian regulation of CONSTANS (CO) expression and the subsequent photoperiodic induction of the expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) gene, which might encode a major component of florigen. In this review, we introduce current perspectives on how, when and where the floral signal is generated.     

Major-effect alleles at relatively few loci underlie distinct vernalization and flowering variation in Arabidopsis accessions

We have explored the genetic basis of variation in vernalization requirement and response in Arabidopsis accessions, selected on the basis of their phenotypic distinctiveness. Phenotyping of F2 populations in different environments, plus fine mapping, indicated possible causative genes. Our data support the identification of FRI and FLC as candidates for the major-effect QTL underlying variation in vernalization response, and identify a weak FLC allele, caused by a Mutator-like transposon, contributing to flowering time variation in two N. American accessions. They also reveal a number of additional QTL that contribute to flowering time variation after saturating vernalization. One of these was the result of expression variation at the FT locus. Overall, our data suggest that distinct phenotypic variation in the vernalization and flowering response of Arabidopsis accessions is accounted for by variation that has arisen independently at relatively few major-effect loci.     

A root chicory MADS box sequence and the Arabidopsis flowering repressor FLC share common features that suggest conserved function in vernalization and de‐vernalization responses

Root chicory (Cichorium intybus var. sativum) is a biennial crop, but is harvested to obtain root inulin at the end of the first growing season before flowering. However, cold temperatures may vernalize seeds or plantlets, leading to incidental early flowering, and hence understanding the molecular basis of vernalization is important. A MADS box sequence was isolated by RT‐PCR and named FLC‐LIKE1 (CiFL1) because of its phylogenetic positioning within the same clade as the floral repressor Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS C (AtFLC). Moreover, over‐expression of CiFL1 in Arabidopsis caused late flowering and prevented up‐regulation of the AtFLC target FLOWERING LOCUS T by photoperiod, suggesting functional conservation between root chicory and Arabidopsis. Like AtFLC in Arabidopsis, CiFL1 was repressed during vernalization of seeds or plantlets of chicory, but repression of CiFL1 was unstable when the post‐vernalization temperature was favorable to flowering and when it de‐vernalized the plants. This instability of CiFL1 repression may be linked to the bienniality of root chicory compared with the annual lifecycle of Arabidopsis. However, re‐activation of AtFLC was also observed in Arabidopsis when a high temperature treatment was used straight after seed vernalization, eliminating the promotive effect of cold on flowering. Cold‐induced down‐regulation of a MADS box floral repressor and its re‐activation by high temperature thus appear to be conserved features of the vernalization and de‐vernalization responses in distant species.     

Interaction of vernalization, photoperiod and high temperature in flowering of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) HEYNH.

Flowering of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) HEYNH., var. "Stockholm",plants, raised from vernalized seeds, may be modified by thephotoperiodic conditions or a short (1 week) exposure to hightemperature (32°C) following vernalization, depending onthe duration of the cold treatment. When vernalization is partial(1 to 4 weeks at 4°C), both short days (8hr light) and hightemperature have a devernalizing effect, but when the cold requirementhas been fully satisfied, after 5 to 6 weeks at 4°C, devernalizationis no longer possible. There is no interaction between photoperiodand high temperature. Fully vernalized plant flower in bothlong and short days, although flowering is delayed in shortdays. This delay is not a photoperiodic effect, however, butmay be ascribed to the decreased radiant energy available inan 8-hr photoperiod. Thus, fully vernalized Arabidopsis plantsare day-neutral. (Received November 5, 1969; )     

Differentiation for flowering time and phenotypic integration in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to season length and vernalization

The response of plants or animals to different environmental regimes may take the form of specialization of their life history patterns to match the prevailing conditions in a geographical area. In turn, the evolution of different life histories implies that there are trade-offs between distinct components of the life cycle. We investigate some of the possible explanations for the existence of distinct types of populations in the weed Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae), differentiated by flowering schedule. The so-called early flowering and late flowering "ecotypes" are hypothesized to result from adaptation to harsh winters or short seasons as opposed to mild winters or long seasons, respectively. We carried out two experiments in which we studied the reaction of natural populations to an increase in season length and to conditions simulating mild winter or spring. Unfortunately, only one of our accessions turned out to be a late flowering population; however, it did have a fitness disadvantage when the season was too short, although it had a higher reproductive output at the end of longer growing seasons. Most populations reacted to the simulation of a mild winter by extending their vegetative phase and increasing their reproductive output; however, this could be offset by increased winter mortality under harsh conditions. Character correlations (phenotypic integration) showed contrasting patterns of change in response to the two environmental factors: at the shortest season's length many correlations were negative, displaying a trade-off between vegetative and reproductive traits; during longer seasons, all correlations were positive and there was no evidence of vegetative-reproductive trade-offs. Exposure to cold did not trigger any major change in the pattern of character correlations.     

植物非编码RNA调控春化作用的表观遗传

在自然界中许多高等植物需要通过冬季的低温阶段实现从营养生长到生殖生长的时期转化,这一生物学过程称作春化作用。小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)和油菜(Brassica napus L.)等作物以种子为产品器官,生产上往往通过茬口安排和栽培措施使植株尽早通过春化作用,以促进花芽形成和花器官发育,而大白菜(B rapa ssp.pekinenesis)和甘蓝(B.oleracea)等作物以叶球等营养器官作为产品器官,生产上则设法避免低温引起的春化作用,以保证产品器官的充分生长。FLOWERING LOCUS C(FLC)作为一种重要的开花抑制蛋白负调控春化作用,参与植株从营养生长向生殖生长的转化过程。文章综述了春化中FLC表达受抑制主要通过低温诱导表达FLC基因区域的非编码RNA以及VRN1、VRN2、VIN3等蛋白参与介导组蛋白甲基化,从而在表观遗传上控制春化作用的进程和产品器官的正常发育。     

The control by gibberellic acid of stem elongation and flowering in biennial plants of Centaurium minus Moench

Summary Application of a small amount of gibberellic acid (GA₃) to unvernalized rosettes of a biennial strain of Centaurium minus Moench brings about immediate stem elongation under both long days (LD) and short days (SD), but the rate of stem elongation falls after the cessation of treatment. Under LD, but not SD, a second period of rapid and prolonged stem elongation may subsequently take place, associated with flowering. Extended GA₃ treatment under SD leads to the formation of a long stem but not to flowering; after the treatment the plants revert to vegetative aerial rosettes unless transferred to LD prior to the cessation of stem elongation; after such a transfer, rapid stem elongation and flowering may be initiated. If flower primordia are initiated under LD, stem elongation and formation of flower primordia continue after transfer to SD, though flowers do not develop fully. It is suggested that under LD but not SD applied GA₃ may bring about the production of endogenous gibberellin, and that this synthesis of endogenous gibberellin occurs in the flower primordia.     

Wheat SOC1 functions independently of WAP1/VRN1, an integrator of vernalization and photoperiod flowering promotion pathways

Heading time in bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is determined by three characters – vernalization requirement, photoperiodic sensitivity and narrow-sense earliness (earliness per se) – which are involved in the phase transition from vegetative to reproductive growth. The wheat APETALA1 ( AP1 )-like MADS-box gene, wheat AP1 ( WAP1 , identical with VRN1 ), has been identified as an integrator of vernalization and photoperiod flowering promotion pathways. A MADS-box gene, SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1 ( SOC1 ) is an integrator of flowering pathways in Arabidopsis . In this study, we isolated a wheat ortholog of SOC1 , wheat SOC1 ( WSOC1 ), and investigated its relationship to WAP1 in the flowering pathway. WSOC1 is expressed in young spikes but preferentially expressed in leaves. Expression starts before the phase transition and is maintained during the reproductive growth phase. Overexpression of WSOC1 in transgenic Arabidopsis plants caused early flowering under short-day conditions, suggesting that WSOC1 functions as a flowering activator in Arabidopsis . WSOC1 expression is affected neither by vernalization nor photoperiod, whereas it is induced by gibberellin at the seedling stage. Furthermore, WSOC1 is expressed in transgenic wheat plants in which WAP1 expression is cosuppressed. These findings indicate that WSOC1 acts in a pathway different from the WAP1 -related vernalization and photoperiod pathways.