共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
Plant defensins are small, highly stable, cysteine-rich peptides that constitute a part of the innate immune system primarily directed against fungal pathogens. Biological activities reported for plant defensins include antifungal activity, antibacterial activity, proteinase inhibitory activity and insect amylase inhibitory activity. Plant defensins have been shown to inhibit infectious diseases of humans and to induce apoptosis in a human pathogen. Transgenic plants overexpressing defensins are strongly resistant to fungal pathogens. Based on recent studies, some plant defensins are not merely toxic to microbes but also have roles in regulating plant growth and development.Key words: defensin, antifungal, antimicrobial peptide, development, innate immunityDefensins are diverse members of a large family of cationic host defence peptides (HDP), widely distributed throughout the plant and animal kingdoms.1–3 Defensins and defensin-like peptides are functionally diverse, disrupting microbial membranes and acting as ligands for cellular recognition and signaling.4 In the early 1990s, the first members of the family of plant defensins were isolated from wheat and barley grains.5,6 Those proteins were originally called γ-thionins because their size (∼5 kDa, 45 to 54 amino acids) and cysteine content (typically 4, 6 or 8 cysteine residues) were found to be similar to the thionins.7 Subsequent “γ-thionins” homologous proteins were indentified and cDNAs were cloned from various monocot or dicot seeds.8 Terras and his colleagues9 isolated two antifungal peptides, Rs-AFP1 and Rs-AFP2, noticed that the plant peptides'' structural and functional properties resemble those of insect and mammalian defensins, and therefore termed the family of peptides “plant defensins” in 1995. Sequences of more than 80 different plant defensin genes from different plant species were analyzed.10 A query of the UniProt database (www.uniprot.org/) currently reveals publications of 371 plant defensins available for review. The Arabidopsis genome alone contains more than 300 defensin-like (DEFL) peptides, 78% of which have a cysteine-stabilized α-helix β-sheet (CSαβ) motif common to plant and invertebrate defensins.11 In addition, over 1,000 DEFL genes have been identified from plant EST projects.12Unlike the insect and mammalian defensins, which are mainly active against bacteria,2,3,10,13 plant defensins, with a few exceptions, do not have antibacterial activity.14 Most plant defensins are involved in defense against a broad range of fungi.2,3,10,15 They are not only active against phytopathogenic fungi (such as Fusarium culmorum and Botrytis cinerea), but also against baker''s yeast and human pathogenic fungi (such as Candida albicans).2 Plant defensins have also been shown to inhibit the growth of roots and root hairs in Arabidopsis thaliana16 and alter growth of various tomato organs which can assume multiple functions related to defense and development.4 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
Depending on the threat to a plant, different pattern recognition receptors, such as receptor-like kinases, identify the stress and trigger action by appropriate defense response development.1,2 The plant immunity system primary response to these challenges is rapid accumulation of phytohormones, such as ethylene (ET), salicylic acid (SA), and jasmonic acid (JA) and its derivatives. These phytohormones induce further signal transduction and appropriate defenses against biotic threats.3,4 Phytohormones play crucial roles not only in the initiation of diverse downstream signaling events in plant defense but also in the activation of effective defenses through an essential process called signaling pathway crosstalk, a mechanism involved in transduction signals between two or more distinct, “linear signal transduction pathways simultaneously activated in the same cell.”5 相似文献
6.
In young Arabidopsis seedlings, retrograde signaling from plastids regulates the expression of photosynthesis-associated nuclear genes in response to the developmental and functional state of the chloroplasts. The chloroplast-located PPR protein GUN1 is required for signalling following disruption of plastid protein synthesis early in seedling development before full photosynthetic competence has been achieved. Recently we showed that sucrose repression and the correct temporal expression of LHCB1, encoding a light-harvesting chlorophyll protein associated with photosystem II, are perturbed in gun1 mutant seedlings.1 Additionally, we demonstrated that in gun1 seedlings anthocyanin accumulation and the expression of the “early” anthocyanin-biosynthesis genes is perturbed. Early seedling development, predominantly at the stage of hypocotyl elongation and cotyledon expansion, is also affected in gun1 seedlings in response to sucrose, ABA and disruption of plastid protein synthesis by lincomycin. These findings indicate a central role for GUN1 in plastid, sucrose and ABA signalling in early seedling development.Key words: ABA, ABI4, anthocyanin, chloroplast, GUN1, retrograde signalling, sucroseArabidopsis seedlings develop in response to light and other environmental cues. In young seedlings, development is fuelled by mobilization of lipid reserves until chloroplast biogenesis is complete and the seedlings can make the transition to phototrophic growth. The majority of proteins with functions related to photosynthesis are encoded by the nuclear genome, and their expression is coordinated with the expression of genes in the chloroplast genome. In developing seedlings, retrograde signaling from chloroplasts to the nucleus regulates the expression of these nuclear genes and is dependent on the developmental and functional status of the chloroplast. Two classes of gun (genomes uncoupled) mutants defective in retrograde signalling have been identified in Arabidopsis: the first, which comprises gun2–gun5, involves mutations in genes encoding components of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis.2,3 The other comprises gun1, which has mutations in a nuclear gene encoding a plastid-located pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein with an SMR (small MutS-related) domain near the C-terminus.4,5 PPR proteins are known to have roles in RNA processing6 and the SMR domain of GUN1 has been shown to bind DNA,4 but the specific functions of these domains in GUN1 are not yet established. However, GUN1 has been shown to be involved in plastid gene expression-dependent,7 redox,4 ABA1,4 and sucrose signaling,1,4,8 as well as light quality and intensity sensing pathways.9–11 In addition, GUN1 has been shown to influence anthocyanin biosynthesis, hypocotyl extension and cotyledon expansion.1,11 相似文献
7.
Stephen J Demarest Mangala Hariharan Marikka Elia Jared Salbato Ping Jin Colin Bird Jay M Short Bruce E Kimmel Michael Dudley Gary Woodnutt Geneviève Hansen 《MABS-AUSTIN》2010,2(2):190-198
The pathogenicity of Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is mediated by the release of two toxins, A and B. Both toxins contain large clusters of repeats known as cell wall binding (CWB) domains responsible for binding epithelial cell surfaces. Several murine monoclonal antibodies were generated against the CWB domain of toxin A and screened for their ability to neutralize the toxin individually and in combination. Three antibodies capable of neutralizing toxin A all recognized multiple sites on toxin A, suggesting that the extent of surface coverage may contribute to neutralization. Combination of two noncompeting antibodies, denoted 3358 and 3359, enhanced toxin A neutralization over saturating levels of single antibodies. Antibody 3358 increased the level of detectable CWB domain on the surface of cells, while 3359 inhibited CWB domain cell surface association. These results suggest that antibody combinations that cover a broader epitope space on the CWB repeat domains of toxin A (and potentially toxin B) and utilize multiple mechanisms to reduce toxin internalization may provide enhanced protection against C. difficile-associated diarrhea.Key words: Clostridium difficile, toxin neutralization, therapeutic antibody, cell wall binding domains, repeat proteins, CROPs, mAb combinationThe most common cause of nosocomial antibiotic-associated diarrhea is the gram-positive, spore-forming anaerobic bacillus Clostridium difficile (C. difficile). Infection can be asymptomatic or lead to acute diarrhea, colitis, and in severe instances, pseudomembranous colitis and toxic megacolon.1,2The pathological effects of C. difficile have long been linked to two secreted toxins, A and B.3,4 Some strains, particularly the virulent and antibiotic-resistant strain 027 with toxinotype III, also produce a binary toxin whose significance in the pathogenicity and severity of disease is still unclear.5 Early studies including in vitro cell-killing assays and ex vivo models indicated that toxin A is more toxigenic than toxin B; however, recent gene manipulation studies and the emergence of virulent C. difficile strains that do not express significant levels of toxin A (termed “A− B+”) suggest a critical role for toxin B in pathogenicity.6,7Toxins A and B are large multidomain proteins with high homology to one another. The N-terminal region of both toxins enzymatically glucosylates small GTP binding proteins including Rho, Rac and CDC42,8,9 leading to altered actin expression and the disruption of cytoskeletal integrity.9,10 The C-terminal region of both toxins is composed of 20 to 30 residue repeats known as the clostridial repetitive oligopeptides (CROPs) or cell wall binding (CWB) domains due to their homology to the repeats of Streptococcus pneumoniae LytA,11–14 and is responsible for cell surface recognition and endocytosis.12,15–17C. difficile-associated diarrhea is often, but not always, induced by antibiotic clearance of the normal intestinal flora followed by mucosal C. difficile colonization resulting from preexisting antibiotic resistant C. difficile or concomitant exposure to C. difficile spores, particularly in hospitals. Treatments for C. difficile include administration of metronidazole or vancomycin.2,18 These agents are effective; however, approximately 20% of patients relapse. Resistance of C. difficile to these antibiotics is also an emerging issue19,20 and various non-antibiotic treatments are under investigation.20–25Because hospital patients who contract C. difficile and remain asymptomatic have generally mounted strong antibody responses to the toxins,26,27 active or passive immunization approaches are considered hopeful avenues of treatment for the disease. Toxins A and B have been the primary targets for immunization approaches.20,28–33 Polyclonal antibodies against toxins A and B, particularly those that recognize the CWB domains, have been shown to effectively neutralize the toxins and inhibit morbidity in rodent infection models.31 Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the CWB domains of the toxins have also demonstrated neutralizing capabilities; however, their activity in cell-based assays is significantly weaker than that observed for polyclonal antibody mixtures.33–36We investigated the possibility of creating a cocktail of two or more neutralizing mAbs that target the CWB domain of toxin A with the goal of synthetically re-creating the superior neutralization properties of polyclonal antibody mixtures. Using the entire CWB domain of toxin A, antibodies were raised in rodents and screened for their ability to neutralize toxin A in a cell-based assay. Two mAbs, 3358 and 3359, that (1) both independently demonstrated marginal neutralization behavior and (2) did not cross-block one another from binding toxin A were identified. We report here that 3358 and 3359 use differing mechanisms to modify CWB-domain association with CHO cell surfaces and combine favorably to reduce toxin A-mediated cell lysis. 相似文献
8.
9.
Takamitsu Kurusu Jumpei Hamada Haruyasu Hamada Shigeru Hanamata Kazuyuki Kuchitsu 《Plant signaling & behavior》2010,5(8):1045-1047
Cytosolic free Ca2+ mobilization induced by microbe/pathogen-asssociated molecular patterns (MAMPs/PAMPs) plays key roles in plant innate immunity. However, components involved in Ca2+ signaling pathways still remain to be identified and possible involvement of the CBL (calcineurin B-like proteins)-CIPK (CBL-interacting protein kinases) system in biotic defense signaling have yet to be clarified. Recently we identified two CIPKs, OsCIPK14 and OsCIPK15, which are rapidly induced by MAMPs, involved in various MAMP-induced immune responses including defense-related gene expression, phytoalexin biosynthesis and hypersensitive cell death. MAMP-induced production of reactive oxygen species as well as cell browning were also suppressed in OsCIPK14/15-RNAi transgenic cell lines. Possible molecular mechanisms and physiological functions of the CIPKs in plant innate immunity are discussed.Key words: PAMPs/MAMPs, calcium signaling, CBL-CIPK, hypersensitive cell death, reactive oxygen speciesCa2+ plays an essential role as an intracellular second messenger in plants as well as in animals. Several families of Ca2+ sensor proteins have been identified in higher plants, which decode spatiotemporal patterns of intracellular Ca2+ concentration.1,2 Calcineurin B-Like Proteins (CBLs) comprise a family of Ca2+ sensor proteins similar to both the regulatory β-subunit of calcineurin and neuronal Ca2+ sensors of animals.3,4 Unlike calcineurin B that regulates protein phosphatases, CBLs specifically target a family of protein kinases referred to as CIPKs (CBL-Interacting Protein Kinases).5 The CBL-CIPK system has been shown to be involved in a wide range of signaling pathways, including abiotic stress responses such as drought and salt, plant hormone responses and K+ channel regulation.6,7Following the recognition of pathogenic signals, plant cells initiate the activation of a widespread signal transduction network that trigger inducible defense responses, including the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), biosynthesis of phytoalexins, expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and reorganization of cytoskeletons and the vacuole,8 followed by a form of programmed cell death known as hypersensitive response (HR).9,10 Because complexed spatiotemporal patterns of cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]cyt) have been suggested to play pivotal roles in defense signaling,1,9 multiple Ca2+ sensor proteins and their effectors should function in defense signaling pathways. Although possible involvement of some calmodulin isoforms11–13 and the calmodulin-domain/calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs)14–19 has been suggested, other Ca2+-regulated signaling components still remain to be identified. No CBLs or CIPKs had so far been implicated as signaling components in innate immunity. 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
The mechanism of cold perception by plants is still poorly understood. It was found that temperature drop evokes changes in the activity of ion pumps and channels, which leads to plasma membrane depolarization.1,2 The nature of the primary step of its action (alteration in membrane composition,3 transient influx of Ca2+ etc.,2) has not been elicited yet. Our electrophysiological experiments conducted on the liverwort Conocephalum conicum showed that its cells respond not only to sudden cooling4 but also to menthol, generating depolarization of the plasma membrane and action potentials (APs). Similar results are well documented in mammals; cold or “cooling compounds” including menthol cause activation of thermosenstitive channel TRPM8 permeable to Ca2+ and generation of AP series.5 TRP receptors are detected, among others, in green and brown algae. Possible existence of TRPM8-like channel-receptor in Conocephalum conicum is discussed here.Key words: action potential, cold, liverwort, menthol, thermoreceptors, voltage transient 相似文献
13.
Adi Zaltsman Alexander Krichevsky Stanislav V Kozlovsky Farzana Yasmin Vitaly Citovsky 《Plant signaling & behavior》2010,5(10):1245-1248
The soil phytopathogen Agrobacterium has the unique ability to introduce single-stranded transferred DNA (T-DNA) from its tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid into the host cell in a process known as horizontal gene transfer. Following its entry into the host cell cytoplasm, the T-DNA associates with the bacterial virulence (Vir) E2 protein, also exported from Agrobacterium, creating the T-DNA nucleoprotein complex (T-complex), which is then translocated into the nucleus where the DNA is integrated into the host chromatin. VirE2 protects the T-DNA from the host DNase activities, packages it into a helical filament and interacts with the host proteins, one of which, VIP1, facilitates nuclear import of the T-complex and its subsequent targeting to the host chromatin. Although the VirE2 and VIP1 protein components of the T-complex are vital for its intracellular transport, they must be removed to expose the T-DNA for integration. Our recent work demonstrated that this task is aided by an host defense-related F-box protein VBF that is induced by Agrobacterium infection and that recognizes and binds VIP1. VBF destabilizes VirE2 and VIP1 in yeast and plant cells, presumably via SCF-mediated proteasomal degradation. VBF expression in and export from the Agrobacterium cell lead to increased tumorigenesis. Here, we discuss these findings in the context of the “arms race” between Agrobacterium infectivity and plant defense.Key words: Arabidopsis, defense response, proteasomal degradation, bacterial infection, F-box proteinAgrobacterium infection of plants consists of a chain of events that usually starts in physically wounded tissue which produces Plant defense pathways subverted by Agrobacterium for genetic transformation small phenolic molecules, such as acetosyringone (AS).1 These phenolics serve as chemotactic agents and activating signals for the virulence (vir) gene region of the Ti plasmid.2,3 The vir gene products then process the T-DNA region of the Ti plasmid to a single-stranded DNA molecule that is exported with several Vir proteins into the host cell cytoplasm, in which it forms a the T-DNA nucleoprotein complex (T-complex).4,5 The plant responds to the coming invasion by expressing and activating several defense-related proteins,5 such as VBF6 and VIP1,7 aimed at suppressing the pathogen. However, the Agrobacterium has evolved mechanisms to take advantage of these host defense proteins.8 Some of the unique strategies for achieving this goal include (1) the use of VIP1 to bind the T-complex—via the VIP1 interaction with the T-DNA packaging protein VirE2,9,10—and assist its nuclear import7 and chromatin targeting,11 and (2) the use of VBF to mark VIP1 and its associated VirE2 for proteasomal degradation, presumably for uncoating the T-complex prior to the T-DNA integration into the plant genome.6,12 Here, we examine these subversion strategies in the context of “arms race” between Agrobacterium and plants. 相似文献
14.
Fetal cells migrate into the mother during pregnancy. Fetomaternal transfer probably occurs in all pregnancies and in humans the fetal cells can persist for decades. Microchimeric fetal cells are found in various maternal tissues and organs including blood, bone marrow, skin and liver. In mice, fetal cells have also been found in the brain. The fetal cells also appear to target sites of injury. Fetomaternal microchimerism may have important implications for the immune status of women, influencing autoimmunity and tolerance to transplants. Further understanding of the ability of fetal cells to cross both the placental and blood-brain barriers, to migrate into diverse tissues, and to differentiate into multiple cell types may also advance strategies for intravenous transplantation of stem cells for cytotherapeutic repair. Here we discuss hypotheses for how fetal cells cross the placental and blood-brain barriers and the persistence and distribution of fetal cells in the mother.Key Words: fetomaternal microchimerism, stem cells, progenitor cells, placental barrier, blood-brain barrier, adhesion, migrationMicrochimerism is the presence of a small population of genetically distinct and separately derived cells within an individual. This commonly occurs following transfusion or transplantation.1–3 Microchimerism can also occur between mother and fetus. Small numbers of cells traffic across the placenta during pregnancy. This exchange occurs both from the fetus to the mother (fetomaternal)4–7 and from the mother to the fetus.8–10 Similar exchange may also occur between monochorionic twins in utero.11–13 There is increasing evidence that fetomaternal microchimerism persists lifelong in many child-bearing women.7,14 The significance of fetomaternal microchimerism remains unclear. It could be that fetomaternal microchimerism is an epiphenomenon of pregnancy. Alternatively, it could be a mechanism by which the fetus ensures maternal fitness in order to enhance its own chances of survival. In either case, the occurrence of pregnancy-acquired microchimerism in women may have implications for graft survival and autoimmunity. More detailed understanding of the biology of microchimeric fetal cells may also advance progress towards cytotherapeutic repair via intravenous transplantation of stem or progenitor cells.Trophoblasts were the first zygote-derived cell type found to cross into the mother. In 1893, Schmorl reported the appearance of trophoblasts in the maternal pulmonary vasculature.15 Later, trophoblasts were also observed in the maternal circulation.16–20 Subsequently various other fetal cell types derived from fetal blood were also found in the maternal circulation.21,22 These fetal cell types included lymphocytes,23 erythroblasts or nucleated red blood cells,24,25 haematopoietic progenitors7,26,27 and putative mesenchymal progenitors.14,28 While it has been suggested that small numbers of fetal cells traffic across the placenta in every human pregnancy,29–31 trophoblast release does not appear to occur in all pregnancies.32 Likewise, in mice, fetal cells have also been reported in maternal blood.33,34 In the mouse, fetomaternal transfer also appears to occur during all pregnancies.35 相似文献
15.
VERNALIZATION INSENSITIVE 3 (VIN3) encodes a PHD domain chromatin remodelling protein that is induced in response to cold and is required for the establishment of the vernalization response in Arabidopsis thaliana.1 Vernalization is the acquisition of the competence to flower after exposure to prolonged low temperatures, which in Arabidopsis is associated with the epigenetic repression of the floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC).2,3 During vernalization VIN3 binds to the chromatin of the FLC locus,1 and interacts with conserved components of Polycomb-group Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2).4,5 This complex catalyses the tri-methylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3),4,6,7 a repressive chromatin mark that increases at the FLC locus as a result of vernalization.4,7–10 In our recent paper11 we found that VIN3 is also induced by hypoxic conditions, and as is the case with low temperatures, induction occurs in a quantitative manner. Our experiments indicated that VIN3 is required for the survival of Arabidopsis seedlings exposed to low oxygen conditions. We suggested that the function of VIN3 during low oxygen conditions is likely to involve the mediation of chromatin modifications at certain loci that help the survival of Arabidopsis in response to prolonged hypoxia. Here we discuss the implications of our observations and hypotheses in terms of epigenetic mechanisms controlling gene regulation in response to hypoxia.Key words: arabidopsis, VIN3, FLC, hypoxia, vernalization, chromatin remodelling, survival 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
Comment on: Coupé B, et al. Cell Metab 2012; 15:247–55, Kaushik S, et al. EMBO Rep 2012; 13:258-65 and Quan W, et al. Endocrinology 2012; 153: In pressAutophagy has received considerable attention over the past decade owing to the fact that alteration of this cellular process, which degrades cytoplasmic materials, including organelles and misfolded proteins, contributes to a variety of diseases, such as cancer, muscular disorders and neurodegeneration.1 Recent studies using conditional, cell-specific gene-targeting methods have also revealed the importance of autophagy in the regulation of energy balance. For example, the deletion of essential autophagy genes, such as the autophagy-related gene (Atg) 7, in the liver, pancreas or adipose tissue produces alterations in body weight, adiposity and glucose homeostasis.2-6 Appetite, energy expenditure and metabolism are also carefully regulated by the central nervous system (CNS), particularly the pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus. These neurons act as major negative regulators of energy balance by reducing food intake and increasing energy expenditure. However, the role of CNS autophagy in the regulation of energy balance is largely unknown.Three recent studies, including one from our laboratory, have implicated CNS autophagy in the pathogenesis of obesity (Fig. 1).7-9 These studies used a conditional cre-loxP approach to specifically delete Atg7 from POMC neurons. Pomc-Cre; Atg7loxploxp mice display higher body weights, hyperphagia and impaired glucose tolerance.7-9 These mice also exhibit an increased adiposity that is associated with leptin resistance.7-9 Mice lacking autophagy in POMC neurons develop an increased sensitivity to weight gain when they are fed a high-fat/high-energy diet.8,9Open in a separate windowFigure 1. Schematic diagram illustrating the metabolic and structural effects of autophagy deletion in hypothalamic POMC neurons. POMC, pro-opiomelanocortin; Atg, autophagy-related gene.Autophagy plays a particularly important role in biological processes that involve massive cellular elimination, such as neural development.10 Autophagy is constitutively present in the hypothalamus during important periods of development, and the loss of Atg7 in POMC neurons produces marked structural alterations during the first weeks of postnatal life and prior to the development of obesity(Fig. 1).7
Pomc-Cre; Atg7loxPloxP mice exhibit a reduced density of POMC-containing projections to each of their target nuclei, including the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, as early as postnatal day 14. These abnormalities in POMC neural projections persist throughout adult life and appear to be the result of diminished capacity of POMC neurons to extend axons.7 However, all developmental processes are not affected by autophagy deficiency. No changes in POMC cell numbers between Pomc-Cre; Atg7loxploxp and control mice are observed,7-9 which suggests that autophagy does not influence neurogenesis or programmed cell death, but that it specifically affects axonal growth. However, autophagy may be involved in hypothalamic neurodegeneration, because aging is associated with a decline in hypothalamic autophagy and the accumulation of p62 (a polyubiquitin-binding protein that is normally degraded by autophagy) specifically in POMC neurons.8 In addition, axonal swelling, which is a hallmark of neurodegeneration, is observed in the hypothalamus of mice that lack autophagy in POMC neurons (Coupé and Bouret, unpublished data).Together, these recent studies suggest that autophagy is required for the proper development and function of POMC neurons, and that autophagy deficiency in POMC neurons causes marked metabolic and structural alterations. Autophagy is highly regulated by nutrient availability,11 including during perinatal life, and further studies may provide novel mechanistic insights on the influence of perinatal dietary changes on the susceptibility to metabolic diseases. 相似文献
19.