Splenogonadal Fusion: An Unusual Case of an Acute Scrotum

We highlight a case on a normal left testicle with a fibrovascular cord with three nodules consistent with splenic tissue. The torsed splenule demonstrated hemorrhage with neutrophilic infiltrate and thrombus consistent with chronic infarction and torsion. Splenogonadal fusion (SGF) is a rather rare entity, with approximately 184 cases reported in the literature. The most comprehensive review was that of 123 cases completed by Carragher in 1990. Since then, an additional 61 cases have been reported in the scientific literature. We have studied these 61 cases in detail and have included a summary of that information here.Key words: Splenogonadal fusion, Acute scrotumA 10-year-old boy presented with worsening left-sided scrotal pain of 12 hours’ duration. The patient reported similar previous episodes occurring intermittently over the past several months. His past medical history was significant for left hip dysplasia, requiring multiple hip surgeries. On examination, he was found to have an edematous left hemiscrotum with a left testicle that was rigid, tender, and noted to be in a transverse lie. The ultrasound revealed possible polyorchism, with two testicles on the left and one on the right (Figure 1), and left epididymitis. One of the left testicles demonstrated a loss of blood flow consistent with testicular torsion (Figure 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Ultrasound of the left hemiscrotum reveals two spherical structures; the one on the left is heterogeneous and hyperdense in comparison to the right.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Doppler ultrasound of left hemiscrotum. No evidence of blood flow to left spherical structure.The patient was taken to the operating room for immediate scrotal exploration. A normalappearing left testicle with a normal epididymis was noted. However, two accessory structures were noted, one of which was torsed 720°; (Figure 3). An inguinal incision was then made and a third accessory structure was noted. All three structures were connected with fibrous tissue, giving a “rosary bead” appearance. The left accessory structures were removed, a left testicular biopsy was taken, and bilateral scrotal orchipexies were performed.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Torsed accessory spleen with splenogonadal fusion.Pathology revealed a normal left testicle with a fibrovascular cord with three nodules consistent with splenic tissue. The torsed splenule demonstrated hemorrhage with neutrophillic infiltrate and thrombus consistent with chronic infarction and torsion (Figure 4).Open in a separate windowFigure 4Splenogonadal fusion, continuous type with three accessory structures.     

Similarities and differences between phytochrome-mediated growth inhibition of coleoptiles and seminal roots in rice seedlings

In rice, light is known to inhibit the growth of coleoptiles and seminal roots of seedlings through phytochrome. Here we investigated the light-induced growth inhibition of seminal roots and compared the results with those recently determined for coleoptiles. Although three rice phytochromes, phyA, phyB and phyC functioned in a similar manner in coleoptile and seminal root, the Bunsen-Roscoe law of reciprocity was not observed in the growth inhibition of seminal root. We also found coiling of the seminal root at the root tip which appeared to be associated with the photoinhibition of seminal root growth. This could be a new light-induced phenomenon in certain cultivars of rice.Key words: growth, hypocotyl, Oryza sativa, phytochrome, seminal rootPhytochrome-mediated growth inhibition was reported for both coleoptiles and seminal roots of rice seedlings in the same year by two research groups in Nagoya and Tohoku University in Japan, respectively.^1,2 Forty years after the findings, a detailed photobiological study was carried out for the coleoptile growth inhibition.³ In this study, we examined photoinhibition of seminal root growth, and found similarities and differences between light-induced growth inhibition of the two organs in rice seedlings. Although coleoptile growth was inhibited by pulses of light, growth inhibition of seminal roots required light irradiation longer than 6 h. The Bunsen-Roscoe law of reciprocity was not observed in the growth inhibition of seminal root. Action spectra were determined for the growth inhibition of coleoptiles, and the mode of inhibition was found to depend on the age of the coleoptiles. At the early stage of development [40 h after inducing germination (AIG)], photoinhibition was predominantly due to the phyB-mediated low-fluence response (LFR), but at the late developmental stage (80 h AIG), it consisted of the phyA-mediated very low-fluence response (VLFR) as well as the phyB-mediated LFR.^3,4 In the case of root growth, the sensitivity of photoinhibition also depended on age, and was most sensitive in the period of 48–96 h AIG when seedlings were irradiated for 24 h. Using rice phytochrome mutants,⁵ we found that far-red light for root growth inhibition was perceived exclusively by phyA, that red light was perceived by both phyA and phyB, and that phyC had little or no role in growth inhibition. Furthermore, the fluence rate required for phyB-mediated inhibition was more than 10,000-fold greater than that required for phyA-mediated inhibition. These characteristics of photoinhibition in seminal roots are similar to those found in coleoptiles at the late stage of development.³ In seminal roots, photoinhibition appeared to be mediated by photoreceptors in the root itself.Interestingly, coiling of the root tips always occurred when root growth was inhibited under the light condition (Fig. 1B). Under continuous light irradiation, rice seeds germinated ∼30 h AIG. Seminal roots formed a coil at the root tips during the 48–96 h period AIG, and stopped growing. When they were irradiated for only 24 h on the 3rd day AIG, coils started to form just after the end of irradiation. The roots continued to coil for ∼28 h and then began growing straight again (Fig. 1C). The coils were larger and looser than those formed under continuous light condition (Fig. 1, Open in a separate windowFigure 1Light irradiation induces coiling of root tips in rice seedlings (Oryza sativa cv. Nipponbare). A rice seedling was grown in the dark (A), or in continuous white light (55 µole m⁻² s⁻¹) (B) for 7 d at 28°C. In (C), it was irradiated by white light for 24 h during the 48–72 h period after inducing germination, and kept in the dark again until the 7th day. Arrows and arrowheads indicate the seminal and crown roots, respectively. Seedlings were grown in glass tubes of 3-cm diameter.

Table 1

The size of coil of root tips formed after white light irradiation

Triple X Egyptian woman and a Down's syndrome offspring

The 47, XXX karyotype (triple X) has a frequency of 1 in 1000 female newborns. However, this karyotype is not usually suspected at birth or childhood. Female patients with a sex chromosome abnormality may be fertile. In patients with a 47, XXX cell line there appears to be an increased risk of a cytogenetically abnormal child but the extent of this risk cannot yet be determined; it is probably lower in the non-mosaic 47, XXX patient than the mosaic 46, XX/47, XXX one. We describe a new rare case of triple X woman and a Down''s syndrome offspring. The patient is 26 years of age. She is a housewife, her height is 160 cm and weight is 68 kg and her physical features and mentality are normal. She has had one pregnancy at the age of 25 years resulted in a girl with Down''s syndrome. The child had 47 chromosomes with trisomy 21 (47, XX, +21) Figure 1. The patient also has 47 chromosomes with a triple X karyotype (47, XX, +X) Figure 2. The patient''s husband (27 years old) is physically and mentally normal. He has 46 chromosomes with a normal XY karyotype (46, XY). There are neither Consanguinity between her parent''s nor she and her husband.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Karyotype 47, XX + 21 of the daughter of Triple X syndromeOpen in a separate windowFigure 2Karyptype 47, XX + X of the Down syndrome''s mother     

Conserved residues in the ankyrin domain of VAPYRIN indicate potential protein-protein interaction surfaces

Plant VAPYRINs are required for the establishment of arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) and root nodule symbiosis (RNS). In vapyrin mutants, the intracellular accommodation of AM fungi and rhizobia is blocked, and in the case of AM, the fungal endosymbiont cannot develop arbuscules which serve for nutrient exchange. VAPYRINs are plant-specific proteins that consists of a major sperm protein (MSP) domain and an ankyrin domain. Comparison of VAPYRINs of dicots, monocots and the moss Physcomitrella patens reveals a highly conserved domain structure. We focused our attention on the ankyrin domain, which closely resembles the D34 domain of human ankyrin R. Conserved residues within the petunia VAPYRIN cluster to a surface patch on the concave side of the crescent-shaped ankyrin domain, suggesting that this region may represent a conserved binding site involved in the formation of a protein complex with an essential function in intracellular accommodation of microbial endosymbionts.Key words: VAPYRIN, arbuscular mycorrhiza, petunia, symbiosis, glomus, ankyrin, major sperm protein, VAPPlants engage in mutualistic interactions such as root nodule symbiosis (RNS) with rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) with Glomeromycotan fungi. These associations are referred to as endosymbioses because they involve transcellular passage through the epidermis and intracellular accommodation of the microbial partner within root cortical cells of the host.^1,2 Infection by AM fungi and rhizobia is actively promoted by the plant and requires the establishment of infection structures namely the prepenetration apparatus (PPA) in AM and a preinfection thread in RNS, respectively.^3–5 In both symbioses the intracellular microbial accommodation in epidermal and root cortical cells involves rebuilding of the cytoskeleton and of the entire membrane system.^6–8 Recently, intracellular accommodation of rhizobia and AM fungi, and in particular morphogenesis of the AM fungal feeding structures, the arbuscules, was shown to depend on the novel VAPYRIN protein.^9–11VAPYRINs are plant-specific proteins consisting of two protein-protein interaction domains, an N-terminal major sperm protein (MSP) domain and a C-terminal ankyrin (ANK) domain. MSP of C. elegans forms a cytoskeletal network required for the motility of the ameboidal sperm.¹² MSP domains also occur in VAP proteins that are involved in membrane fusion processes in various eukaryotes.¹³ The ANK domain, on the other hand, closely resembles animal ankyrins which serve to connect integral membrane proteins to elements of the spectrin cytoskeleton,¹⁴ thereby facilitating the assembly of functional membrane microdomains in diverse animal cells.¹⁵ Ankyrin repeats exhibit features of nano-springs, opening the possibility that ankyrin domains may be involved in mechanosensing.¹⁶ Based on these structural similarities, VAPYRIN may promote intracellular accommodation of endosymbionts by interacting with membranes and/or with the cytoskeleton. Indeed, VAPYRIN protein associates with small subcellular compartments in petunia and in Medicago truncatula.^9,10Ankyrin repeats typically consist of 33 amino acids, of which 30–40% are highly conserved across most taxa. These residues confer to the repeats their basic helix-turn-helix structure.¹⁷ Ankyrin domains often consist of arrays of several repeats that form a solenoid with a characteristic crescent shape.¹⁷ Besides the ankyrin-specific motiv-associated amino acids there is little conservation between the ankyrin domains of different proteins, or between the individual repeats of a given ankyrin domain,¹⁷ a feature that was also observed in petunia VAPYRIN (Fig. 1A).⁹ However, sequence comparison of VAPYRINs from eight dicots, three monocots and the moss Physcomitrella patens revealed a high degree of sequence conservation beyond the ankyrin-specific residues (Fig. 1B and Sup. Fig. S1). When the degree of conservation was determined for the individual ankyrin repeats among all the 12 species, it appeared that repeats 7, 9 and 10 exhibited particularly high conservation (Fig. 1C).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Sequence analysis and phylogeny of VAPYRIN from diverse plants. (A) Predicted amino acid sequence of the petunia VAPYRIN protein PAM1. The 11 repeats of the ankyrin domain are aligned, and the ankyrin consensus sequence is shown below the eleventh ankyrin repeat (line c). Conserved residues that are characteristic for ankyrin repeats (Mosavi et al. 2004)¹⁷ are depicted in bold face. (B) Unrooted phylogenetic tree representing the VAPYRINs of eight dicot species (Petunia hybrida, Solanum lycopersicon, Solanum tuberosum, Vitis vinifera, Populus trichocarpa, Ricinus communis, Medicago truncatula and Glycine max) three monocot species (Sorghum bicolor, Zea mays and Oryza sativa), and the moss Physcomitrella patens. (C) Degree of conservation of the individual ankyrin repeats of VAPYRIN. Schematic representation of the MSP domain as N-terminal barrel-shaped structure, and of the individual ankyrin repeats as pairs of alpha-helices. An additional loop occurring only in monocots (grass-loop) is inserted above repeat 4, and the deletion between repeat 7 and 8 is indicated (gap). This latter feature is common to all VAPYRIN proteins. The percentage of amino acid residues that are identical in at least 11 of the 12 VAPYRINS is given below the MSP domain and the eleven ankyrin repeats. The box highlights repeats 7–10 which contribute to the predicted binding site (compare with Figs. 3 and ​and44).Sequence comparison of the eleven repeats of all the twelve plant species revealed that the individual repeats clustered according to their position in the domain, rather than according to their origin (plant species) (Fig. 2). This shows that the repeats each are well conserved across species, but show little similarity among each other within a given VAPYRIN protein. The higher conservation of repeats 9 and 10 was reflected by the compact appearance of the respective branches, in which the monocot and moss sequences were nested closely with the dicot sequences, compared to other repeats, where the branches appeared fragmented between monocots and dicots, and where the P. patens sequence fell out of the branch as in the case of repeats 4–6 (Fig. 2). Taken together, this points to an old evolutionary origin of the entire ankyrin domain in lower land plants, with no subsequent rearrangement of ankyrin repeats.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Phylogenetic analysis of the individual ankyrin repeats of VAPYRIN. Phylogenetic representation of an alignment of all the 11 repeats of the 12 VAPYRINs compared in Figure 1B and C. The repeats cluster according to their position within the domain, rather than to their origin (plant species). Numbers indicate the position of the repeats within the domain (compare with Fig. 1C). P. patens repeats are highlighted (small circles) for clarity. The monocot repeat 4 sequences (boxed) are remote from the remaining repeat 4 sequences because of the grass loop (compare with Fig. 1C).Ankyrin domains function as protein-protein interaction domains,¹⁷ in which the residues on the surface are involved in the binding of their protein partners.¹⁴ The fact that repeats 9 and 10 exhibited particularly high levels of conservation across species from moss to angiosperms indicated that this region may contain functionally important residues. Within repeat 10, sixteen amino acid positions were identical in >90% of the analyzed species (Fig. 3A and grey bars). Nine of those represent residues that are characteristic for ankyrin repeats (red letters) and determine their typical 3D shape.¹⁷ These residues are considered ankyrin-specific, and are unlikely to be involved in a VAPYRIN-specific function. The remaining seven highly conserved residues in repeat 10, however, are VAPYRIN-specific, since they have been under positive selection, without being essential for the basic structure of the ankyrin repeat. Ankyrin-specific and VAPYRIN-specific residues where identified throughout the entire ankyrin domain (Sup. Fig. 1), and subsequently mapped on a 3-dimensional model of petunia VAPYRIN to reveal their position in the protein (Fig. 3B–G). The ankyrin-specific residues were found to be localized primarily to the interior of the ankyrin domain, with the characteristic glycines (brown) marking the turns between helices and loops (Fig. 3B, D and F, compare with A). In contrast, the VAPYRIN-specific residues were localized primarily on the surface of the ankyrin domain (Fig. 3C, E and G). A prominent clustering of VAPYRIN-specific residues was identified on the concave side of the crescent-shaped ankyrin domain comprising repeats 7–10 close to the gap (Figs. 3G and ​and44). This highly conserved VAPYRIN-specific region contains several negatively and positively charged residues (D, E and K, R, respectively) and aromatic residues (W, Y, F), which may together form a conserved binding site for an interacting protein.Open in a separate windowFigure 33D-Mapping of conserved positions within the ankyrin domain of VAPYRIN. (A) Conserved amino acid residues were evaluated for ankyrin repeat 10 of petunia VAPYRIN as an example. The degree of conservation between the 12 VAPYRINs analyzed in Figures 1B and ​and22 is depicted with grey bars. Average conservation between all the 132 ankyrin repeats of the 12 VAPYRIN sequences is shown with black bars. Residues that are conserved in all 132 repeats (red letters) define the ankyrin consensus sequence, which confers to the repeats their characteristic basic structure.¹⁷ Residues that are >90% conserved but are not part of the basic ankyrin sequence (highlighted with asterisks) are VAPYRIN-specific and may therefore have been conserved because of their specific function in VAPYRIN. Arrows indicate the characteristic antiparallel helices, the turns are marked by conserved glycine residues (underlined; compare with B, D and F). (B–G) 3D-models of the petunia VAPYRIN PAM1. Conserved amino acid residues were color-coded according to their physico-chemical properties (http://life.nthu.edu.tw/∼fmhsu/rasframe/SHAPELY.HTM) with minor modification (see below). In (B, D and F) the ankyrin-specific residues are highlighted (corresponding to the bold letters in Fig. 1A). In (C, E and G), the VAPYRIN-specific residues are highlighted. Note the patch of high conservation on the concave side of the crescent-shaped ankyrin domain between repeats 7–10 next to the gap. (B–E) represent respective side views of the ankyrin domain, (F and G) exhibit the concave inner side of the domain. Color code: Bright red: aspartic acid (D), glutamic acid (E); Yellow: cysteine (C); Blue: lysine (K), arginine (R); Orange: serine (S), threonine (T); Dark blue: phenylalanine (F), tyrosin (Y); Brown: glycine (G); Green: leucin (L), valine (V), isoleucin (I), alanine (A); Lilac: tryptophane (W); Purple: histidine (H); Pink: proline (P).Open in a separate windowFigure 4The highly conserved surface area in domain 8–10 of the ankyrin domain of petunia VAPYRIN. Close-up of the highly conserved region of petunia PAM1 as shown in Figure 3G. Amino acids were color-coded as in Figure 3 and their position in the amino acid sequence is indicated (compare with Sup. Fig. 1).In this context, it is interesting to note that human ankyrin R also contains a binding surface on the concave side of the D34 domain for the interaction with the CBD3 protein.¹⁴ Consistent with an essential function of the C-terminal third of the ankyrin domain, mutations that abolish this relatively short portion of VAPYRIN, have a strong phenotype, indicating that they may represent null alleles.⁹ Based on this collective evidence, we hypothesize that repeats 7–10 are involved in the formation of a protein complex that is essential for intracellular accommodation of rhizobia and AM fungi. Biochemical and genetic studies are now required to identify the binding partners of VAPYRINs, and to elucidate their role in plant endosymbioses.     

Diversity in spindle morphology in Arabidopsis root tip

A primary function of the spindle apparatus is to segregate chromosomes into two equal sets in a dividing cell. It is unclear whether spindles in different cell types play additional roles in cellular regulation. As a first step in revealing new functions of spindles, we investigated spindle morphology in different cell types in Arabidopsis roots in the wild-type and the cytokinesis defective1 (cyd1) mutant backgrounds. cyd1 provides cells larger than those of the wild type for testing the cell size effect on spindle morphology. Our observations indicate that cell type (shape), not cell size, is likely a factor affecting spindle morphology. At least three spindle types were observed, including small spindles with pointed poles in narrow cells, large barrel-shaped spindles (without pointed poles) in wide cells, and spindles intermediate in pole focus and size in other cells. We hypothesize that the cell-type-associated spindle diversity may be an integral part of the cell differentiation processes.Key words: spindle pole, microtubule, morphogenesis, cell type, metaphaseThe cellular apparatus for chromosome segregation during mitosis is typically described as a spindle composed of microtubules and microtubule-associated proteins. Research on the structure and function of the spindle is usually conducted under the assumption that spindles are structurally the same or alike in different cell types in an organism. If the assumption is true, it would indicate that either the intracellular conditions in different dividing cells are very similar or the assembly and maintenance of the spindle are insensitive to otherwise variable intracellular conditions. But experimental evidence related to this assumption is relatively sparse.The root tip in Arabidopsis, as in other higher plants, contains dividing cells of different shapes and sizes. These cells include both meristem initial and derivative cells, with the former and latter being proximal and distal to the quiescent center, respectively.¹ The diversity in dividing cells in the root tip provides an opportunity for testing whether the spindles also exhibit diversity in morphology. To visualize the spindles at the metaphase stage in the root tip cells, we conducted indirect immunofluorescence labeling of the β-tubulin in single cells prepared from wild-type Arabidopsis (in Col-0 background) root tips as previously described in references ² and ³. The spindles in cells of different morphologies were then observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope.³ Three types of spindle were detected. The first type (Fig. 1A) was the smallest in width and length and had the most-pointed poles among the three types. The second type (Fig. 1B) was wider and longer than the first type but with less-pointed poles than the first type. The third type (Fig. 1C) was similar in height to the second type but lacked the pointed poles. In fact, the third type is shaped more like a barrel than a spindle. The first type was found in cells narrow in the direction parallel to the equatorial plane of the spindle, a situation opposite to that of the third type whose cells were wide in the equatorial direction. The wide cells containing the barrel-shaped spindles likely belonged to the epidermal layer in the root tip.¹ The second type was found in cells intermediate in width. Examples of metaphase spindles morphologically resembling the three types of spindles in Arabidopsis root can also be found in a previous report by Xu et al. even although spindle diversity was not the subject of the report.⁴ In Xu et al.''s report, type 1- or 2-like metaphase spindles can be identified in Figures 2B and 3A, and type 3-like metaphase spindles can be identified in Figures 1A and 3B. These observations indicate that at least three types of spindles exist in the root cells.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Spindles in wild-type root cells. (A) Type-1 spindle. (B) Type-2 spindle. (C) Type-3 spindle. The spots without fluorescence signals in the middle of the spindles are where the chromosomes were located. Scale bar for all the figures = 20 µm.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Spindles in cyd1 root cells. (A) Type-1 spindle. Arrows indicate the upper and lower boundaries of the cell. (B and C) Two type-2 spindles. (D and E) Two type-3 spindles. (F) DAPI-staining image corresponding to (E), showing chromosomes at the equatorial plane. Scale bar for the images = 20 µm.The above observations suggest that either the cell size or the cell type (shape) might be a factor in the type of spindle found in a specific cell. To further investigate the relationship between cell morphology and spindle morphology, we studied metaphase spindles in root cells of the cytokinesis defective1 (cyd1) mutant.⁵ Because the root cells in cyd1 were larger than corresponding cells in the wild type, presumably due to abnormal polyploidization prior to the collection of the root cells,^5,6 this investigation might reveal a relationship between increasing cell size and altered spindle morphology. A pattern of different spindle types in different cell types similar to that in the wild type was observed in cyd1 (Fig. 2). Figures 2A–C show narrow cells that contained spindles with pointed poles even though the spindles differed in size and focus. Figure 2D shows a barrel-shaped spindle in a wide cell, resembling Figure 1C in overall appearance. The large number of chromosomes at metaphase (more than the diploid number of 10) in Figure 2F indicates that the cells in Figure 2 were polyploid. These figures thus demonstrate that the enlargement in cell size did not alter the pattern of types 1 and 2 spindles in narrow cells, as well as type 3 spindles in wide cells. Moreover, the edges of the spindles in Figure 2B and E were similarly distanced to the cell walls in the equatorial plane, and yet they differ greatly in shape with the former being type 2 and the latter being type 3. This finding argues against that the cell width in the equatorial direction dictates the spindle shape. On the other hand, the cells in Figure 2B and E are obviously of different types. Taken together, these observations suggest that the spindle diversity in both wild type and cyd1 is associated with cell-type diversity.It is unclear whether the different spindle types have different functions in their respective cell types, in addition to the usual role for chromosome segregation. One possibility is that, at the ensuing telophase, the pointed spindles result in compact chromosomal congregation at the poles whereas the barrel-shaped spindles result in loose chromosomal congregation at the poles, which in turn may differentially affect the shape of the subsequently formed daughter nuclei and their organization. Different nuclear shape and organization are likely to be integrated into the processes that confer cell differentiation.     

Fusicoccin counteracts inhibitory effects of high temperature on auxin-induced growth and proton extrusion in maize coleoptile segments

Plant growth and development are tightly regulated by both plant growth substances and environmental factors such as temperature. Taking into account the above, it was reasonable to point out that indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), the most abundant type of auxin in plants, could be involved in temperature- dependent growth of plant cells. We have recently shown that growth of maize coleoptile segments in the presence of auxin (IAA) and fusicoccin (FC) shows the maximum value in the range 30–35°C and 35–40°C, respectively. Furthermore, simultaneous measurements of growth and external medium pH indicated that FC at stressful temperatures was not only much more active in the stimulation of growth, but was also more effective in acidifying the external medium than IAA. The aim of this addendum is to determine interrelations between the action of IAA and FC (applied together with IAA) on growth and medium pH of maize coleoptile segments incubated at high temperature (40°C), which was optimal for FC but not for IAA.Key words: auxin, fusicoccin, coleoptile segments, elongation growth, medium pHA well studied aspect of auxin action especially in maize coleoptile, is its effect on cell elongation, proton extrusion and membrane potential.^1–7 It is now generally agreed that indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), as the principal regulator of plant elongation growth, causes (i) acceleration of elongation growth as compared to endogenous growth, (ii) enhancement of proton extrusion as compared to auxin—free medium, and (iii) transient depolarization followed by a slow hyperpolarization of membrane potential. According to the “acid growth theory” of elongation growth,^8–11 auxin induced cell wall acidification provides favorable conditions for cell wall loosening, a requirement for cell elongation. At least in maize coleoptile segments, auxin induced cell wall acidification is mediated by increased activity and/or amount of the PM H⁺-ATPase.^11,12 In the case of fusicoccin, which mimics the effect of auxin in many respects,¹³ it was shown that FC-binding site arises from interaction of the 14-3-3 protein dimmer with the C-terminal autoinhibitory domain of the H⁺-ATPase and that FC stabilizes this complex.^14–18 It should be pointed out that in spite of abundant literature on the mechanism through which IAA or FC control growth of grass coleoptiles, little is know how these substances work at extreme temperatures. Over the past decade, the involvement of 14-3-3 proteins in plant stress responses has often been suggested.¹⁹ For example, work by Chelysheva et al.,²⁰ and Babakov et al.,²¹ demonstrated that under low temperature and high osmolarity conditions, 14-3-3 proteins interact with the C-terminal autoinhibitory domain of the PM H⁺-ATPase activating the proton pump that play a key role in stress responses in higher plants. We have recently shown²² that FC at 40°C induced maximal growth whereas growth observed at the same temperature in the presence of IAA was reduced by 33% compared to the maximal value at 30°C. It was also found²² that at 40°C the kinetics of the pH change differed significantly for both growth substances; the segments treated with IAA at 40°C were virtually not able to acidify the external medium, whereas FC at this temperature caused practically maximal acidification. In this addendum we have shown that application of FC together with IAA conteracted the inhibitory effect of high temperature (40°C) on IAA-induced growth and proton extrusion in maize coleoptile segments (Fig. 1). For example, the total IAA-induced elongation growth of coleoptile segments at 40°C was 1438.1 ± 134.5 µm cm⁻¹ (mean ± SE, n = 11) while elongation of 2747.4 ± 269.7 µm cm⁻¹ (mean ± SE, n = 11) was observed in IAA applied together with FC (Fig. 1A). The data in Figure 1B indicate that coleoptile segments incubated at 40°C (over 2 h), without growth substances (control) characteristically changed the pH of the medium: usually within the first 30–45 min an increase of pH (by ca. 0.5 pH unit) was observed, followed by a slow decrease of pH. When IAA or FC was added (after 2 h of segment''s incubation in control medium), an additional decrease of pH was observed. As can be seen in Figure 1B, FC added at 40°C was much more effective in acidification of the medium, as compared to IAA. For FC, 5h after its addition, the pH of the incubation medium dropped to pH 4.2, whereas for IAA the pH was only 5.4. However, addition of IAA together with FC at 40°C dropped medium pH approximately to the same value as was observed in the presence of FC only.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Effect of high temperature (40°C) on growth (A) and medium pH (B) of maize coleoptile segments incubated in the presence of IAA (10 µM) and FC (1 µM). The growth of a stack of 21 segments, expressed as elongation (µm cm⁻¹), was measured simultaneously with medium pH at 40°C. After preincubation (over 2 h) of the coleoptile segments in control medium, IAA and FC was added (arrow). Values are means of 11 independent experiments. Bars indicate ± SE. In the case of medium pH SE did not exceed 8%.In conclusion, the results presented in this addendum provide further evidence that FC on the receptor level is much more effective than IAA.     

Testicular Sclerosing Sertoli Cell Tumor: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Sertoli cell tumors are very rare testicular tumors, representing 0.4% to 1.5% of all testicular malignancies. They are subclassified as classic, large-cell calcifying, and sclerosing Sertoli cell tumors (SSCT) based on distinct clinical features. Only 42 cases of SSCTs have been reported in the literature. We present a case of a 23-year-old man diagnosed with SSCT.Key words: Testicular neoplasm, Sertoli cell tumor, Sclerosing Sertoli cell tumorA 23-year-old man was referred to the Cleveland Clinic Department of Urology (Cleveland, OH) for an incidentally detected right testicular mass. The mass was identified during a work-up for transient left testicular discomfort. His only notable medical history was nephrolithiasis. There was no personal or family history of testicular cancer or cryptorchidism. On physical examination, he was a well-nourished, well-masculinized young man without gynecomastia. Testicular examination revealed normal volume and consistency bilaterally without other relevant findings. Testicular ultrasonography demonstrated an 8 mm × 6 mm × 6 mm hypoechoic, solid mass in the posterior right testicle with peripheral flow on color Doppler (Figure 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Testicular ultrasound demonstrating an 8 mm × 6 mm × 6 mm hypoechoic, solid mass in the posterior right testicle (blue arrows).The remainder of the ultrasound examination yielded normal results. Lactic dehydrogenase, B-human chorionic gonadotropin, and α-fetoprotein levels were all within the normal range. After a thorough review of the options, the patient was then taken to the operating room for inguinal exploration. Intraoperative ultrasound confirmed a superficial 8-mm hypoechoic testis lesion. A whiteyellow, well-demarcated nodule was widely excised and a frozen section was sent to pathology for examination. The frozen section examination revealed the lesion to be a neoplasm with differential diagnosis including sclerosing Sertoli cell tumor (SSCT), adenomatoid tumor, and a variant of Leydig cell tumor. Because the final diagnosis could not be determined from frozen section, the decision was made to perform a right radical orchiectomy. Pathologic examination revealed a grossly unifocal, well-circumscribed, white, firm mass of 0.8 cm. Microscopically the lesion was composed of solid and hollow tubules and occasional anastomosing cords distributed within the hypocellular, densely collagenous stroma. Although the lesion was somewhat well circumscribed, entrapped seminiferous tubules with Sertoli-only cells were present within the tumor (Figure 2). Tumor cells had pale or eosinophilic cytoplasm with small and dark nuclei with inconspicuous nucleoli. The tumor was confined to the testis and margins were negative. A diagnosis of SSCT was reached, supported by positive immunostain results for steroidogenic factor 1, focal inhibin, and calretinin expression, and negative stain results for cytokeratin AE1/AE3 and epithelial membrane antigen in the tumor (Figure 3). The postoperative course was unremarkable. Computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis and chest radiograph were negative for metastatic disease.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Low-power examination revealing a well-circumscribed tumor composed of solid and hollow tubules and occasional anastomosing cords distributed within the hypocellular, densely collagenous stroma. Hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification ×40. (B) High-power examination. Note entrapped seminiferous tubules lacking spermatogenesis. Hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification ×100.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Nuclear expression of steroidogenic factor 1 in the tumor as well as benign Sertoli cells in entrapped seminiferous tubules (original magnification ×200). (B) Focal calretinin expression in the tumor (inhibin had a similar staining pattern; original magnification ×100).     

Arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) related to pollen tube guidance into the embryo sac in Arabidopsis

Some AGP molecules or their sugar moieties are probably related to the guidance of the pollen tube into the embryo sac, in the final part of its pathway, when arriving at the ovules. The specific labelling of the synergid cells and its filiform apparatus, which are the cells responsible for pollen tube attraction, and also the specific labelling of the micropyle and micropylar nucellus, which constitutes the pollen tube entryway into the embryo sac, are quite indicative of this role. We also discuss the possibility that AGPs in the sperm cells are probably involved in the double fertilization process.Key words: Arabidopsis, arabinogalactan proteins, AGP 6, gametic cells, pollen tube guidanceThe selective labelling obtained by us with monoclonal antibodies directed to the glycosidic parts of AGPs, in Arabidopsis and in other plant species, namely Amaranthus hypochondriacus,¹ Actinidia deliciosa² and Catharanthus roseus, shows that some AGP molecules or their sugar moieties are probably related to the guidance of the pollen tube into the embryo sac, in the final part of its pathway, when arriving at the ovules. The evaluation of the selective labelling obtained with AGP-specific monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) JIM 8, JIM 13, MAC 207 and LM 2, during Arabidopsis pollen development, led us to postulate that some AGPs, in particular those with sugar epitopes identified by JIM 8 and JIM 13, can be classified as molecular markers for generative cell differentiation and development into male gametes.Likewise, we also postulated that the AGP epitopes recognized by Mabs JIM 8 and JIM 13 are also molecular markers for the development of the embryo sac in Arabidopsis thaliana. Moreover, these AGP epitopes are also present along the pollen tube pathway, predominantly in its last stage, the micropyle, which constitutes the region of the ovule in the immediate vicinity of the pollen tube target, the embryo sac.³We have recently shown the expression of AGP genes in Arabidopsis pollen grains and pollen tubes and also the presence of AGPs along Arabidopsis pollen tube cell surface and tip region, as opposed to what had been reported earlier. We have also shown that only a subset of AGP genes is expressed in pollen grain and pollen tubes, with prevalence for Agp6 and Agp11, suggesting a specific and defined role for some AGPs in Arabidopsis sexual reproduction (Pereira et al., 2006).⁴Therefore we continued by using an Arabidopsis line expressing GFP under the command of the Agp6 gene promoter sequence. These plants were studied under a low-power binocular fluorescence microscope. GFP labelling was only observed in haploid cells, pollen grains (Fig. 1) and pollen tubes (Fig. 2); all other tissues clearly showed no labelling. These observations confirmed the specific expression of Agp6 in pollen grains and pollen tubes. As shown in the Figures 1 and ​and2,2, the labelling with GFP is present in all pollen tube extension, so probably, AGP 6 is not one of the AGPs identified by JIM 8 and JIM 13, otherwise GFP light emission would localize more specifically in the sperm cells.⁵ So we think that MAC 207 which labels the entire pollen tube wall (Fig. 3) may indeed be recognizing AGP6, which seems to be expressed in the vegetative cell. In other words, the specific labelling obtained for the generative cell and for the two male gametes, is probably given by AGPs that are present in very low quantities, apparently not the case for AGP 6 or AGP 11.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Low-power binocular fluorescence microscope image of an Arabidopsis flower with the AGP 6 promoter:GFP construct. The labelling is evident in pollen grains that are being released and in others that are already in the stigma papillae.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Low-power binocular fluorescence microscope image of an Arabidopsis ovary with the AGP6 promoter:GFP construct. The ovary was partially opened to show the pollen tubes growing in the septum, and into the ovules. The pollen tubes are also labelled by GFP.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Imunofluorescence image of a pollen tube growing in vitro, and labeled by MAC 207 monoclonal antibody. The labelling is evident all over the pollen tube wall.After targeting an ovule, the pollen tube growth arrests inside a synergid cell and bursts, releasing the two sperm cells. It has recently been shown that sperm cells, for long considered to be passive cargo, are involved in directing the pollen tube to its target. In Arabidopsis, HAP2 is expressed only in the haploid sperm and is required for efficient pollen tube guidance to the ovules.⁶ The same could be happening with the AGPs identified in the sperm cells by JIM 8 and JIM 13. We are now working on tagging these AGPs and using transgenic plants aiming to answer to such questions.Pollen tube guidance in the ovary has been shown to be in the control of signals produced by the embryo sac. When pollen tubes enter ovules bearing feronia or sirene mutations (the embryo sac is mutated), they do not stop growing and do not burst. In Zea mays a pollen tube attractant was recently identified in the egg apparatus and synergids.⁷ Chimeric ZmEA1 fused to green fluorescent protein (ZmEA1:GFP) was first visible within the filiform apparatus and later was localized to nucellar cell walls below the micropylar opening of the ovule. This is the same type of labelling that we have shown in Arabidopsis ovules, using Mabs JIM 8 and JIM 13. We are now involved in the identification of the specific AGPs associated with the labellings that we have been showing.     

Biotic and abiotic stress responses through calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) signaling in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) sense the calcium concentration changes in plant cells and play important roles in signaling pathways for disease resistance and various stress responses as indicated by emerging evidences. Among the 20 wheat CDPK genes studied, 10 were found to respond to drought, salinity and ABA treatments. Consistent with previous observations, one CDPK gene was shown to respond to multiple abiotic stresses in wheat suggesting that CDPKs could be converging points for multiple signaling pathways. Among the 12 wheat CDPK genes that were responsive to Blumeria graminis tritici (Bgt) infection or the treatment of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), eight also responded to abiotic stresses, suggesting a cross-talk between biotic and abiotic stress signaling pathways. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that some of these genes were closely related to CDPKs from other species, whose functions have been partially studied, suggesting similar functions wheat CDPK genes. Combining the up-to-date knowledge of CDPK functions and our observations, a model was developed to project the possible roles of wheat CDPK genes in the signaling of biotic and abiotic stress responses.Key words: CDPK, calcium, kinase, stress response, disease resistance, signal transduction, wheatSessile plants have developed sophisticated signaling pathways to deal with dramatic environmental changes that may affect their normal growth, such as pathogen attack, drought, and cold. Calcium is a universal secondary messenger that responds to these stimuli. The fluctuation in cytosolic Ca²⁺ levels can be sensed by calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), which will modify the phosphorylation status of substrate proteins.^1–3 Accumulating evidence indicate that CDPKs mediate biotic and abiotic stress signaling pathways.^4–7 For example, overexpression of the rice CDPK gene OsCDPK7 provides cold, salt, and drought tolerance for the transgenic rice plants, demonstrating the potential of CDPK engineering to generate stress tolerance enhanced crops.^8,9In wheat, 10 out of 14 CDPK genes appeared to respond to abiotic stresses including drought, NaCl, as well as ABA stimulus (Fig. 1A).¹⁰ Five CDPKs (TaCPK4, 6, 9, 10 and 18) were particularly interesting since they could respond to at least two of the three treatments, among which the expression level of TaCPK9 was enhanced under all three treatments suggesting that TaCPK9 is the point where multiple signaling pathways cross. In wheat, TaCPK4 responded to both ABA treatment and NaCl stress (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, its best Arabidopsis homologs AtCPK4 and AtCPK11, as suggested by a Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1B), have been postulated as two important positive regulators in CDPK/calcium-mediated ABA signaling pathways.¹¹ Such a correlation strongly supports the idea that TaCPK4 is a good candidate in wheat for ABA signaling. Figure 1A also shows that one wheat CDPK gene could respond to multiple abiotic stresses suggesting that CDPKs are converging points for multiple signaling pathways. On the other hand, multiple CDPKs were involved in single stress response. It is however not clear how these CDPKs are organized in one signaling pathway.Open in a separate windowFigure 1The roles of wheat CDPKs in abiotic and biotic stress responses. (A) One CDPK gene responded to multiple abiotic stresses and multiple CDPKs were required for single stress response. (B) Phylogenetic relationship of wheat CDPKs with functionally studied CDPKs from barley (HvCPKs), Arabidopsis (AtCPKs), and potato (StCDPKs) that are known to be involved in ABA signaling, oxidative burst regulation and defense to powdery mildew pathogenesis. (C) A model depicting CDPK-mediated signaling pathways under biotic and abiotic treatments in wheat (see text for details). Dotted lines with a question mark indicate unknown intermediate steps.Regarding the roles of CDPKs in defense reactions, 12 TaCPKs were found to be responsive to either Blumeria graminis tritici (Bgt) infection or H₂O₂ treatment. The response to H₂O₂ was investigated because cytosolic calcium influx and reactive oxygen species, such as H₂O₂ are known to be implicated in both plant innate immunity and abiotic stresses.^12–17 Among these CDPK genes, five responded to both treatments (Group II) whereas the ones that responded to Bgt infection (Group I) or H₂O₂ treatment (Group III) were four and three respectively. The differential expression patterns suggest different functional modes of these CDPK genes. Involvement of CDPK genes in plant defense response has been shown in multiple species.^5,7 Recently, two barley CDPK paralogs (HvCDPK3 and HvCDPK4) were found to play antagonistic roles during the early phase of powdery mildew pathogenesis.⁵ The close similarity between wheat CDPK genes (TaCPK2 and TaCPK5, Fig. 1B) with these two barley genes may suggest their potential roles in wheat powdery mildew resistance. Surprisingly, we did not detect the responsiveness of TaCPK5 to wheat Bgt infection, indicating the divergence of CDPK functions in these two members of Triticeae family. Recently, one potato (Solanum tuberosum) CDPK gene StCDPK5 has been shown to be directly involved in regulating oxidative burst via phosphorylation of the NADPH oxidase StRBOHB.¹⁸ In light of the close relationship of TaCPK2 with HvCDPK5 and StCDPK5 (Fig. 1B), we speculate that TaCPK2 could be associated with both biotic and abiotic stress response signaling pathways and therefore play multiple roles in wheat.A model was proposed in Figure 1C regarding the positions of wheat CDPK genes in signaling pathways for biotic and abiotic responses. The hypothesis depicted four different roles of wheat CDPK genes: (1) Group I genes that respond only to Bgt infection may, like potato StCDPK5, render defense response through an oxidase like NADPH oxidase that generates increased amount of H₂O₂;¹⁸ (2) At one aspect, Group II genes may participate in defense response in a manner similar to Group I genes; (3) On the other hand, since Group II genes also respond to H₂O₂ treatment directly, an auto-regulation circuit was proposed, which eventually joins the oxidase pathway; (4) Group III CDPK genes and some remaining CDPK genes are considered to be mainly involved in abiotic stress responses. The model positioned CDPKs both upstream and downstream of H₂O₂, presenting a complicated wiring of the signaling pathway network involving wheat CDPKs. Future biochemical, genetic, and transgenic analyses may help elucidate the genuineness of such a rather early model for the functions of wheat CDPK genes.     

Dynamic protein trafficking to the cell wall

Recently we have studied the secretion pattern of a pectin methylesterase inhibitor protein (PMEI1) and a polygalacturonase inhibitor protein (PGIP2) in tobacco protoplast using the protein fusions, secGFP-PMEI1 and PGIP2-GFP. Both chimeras reach the cell wall by passing through the endomembrane system but using distinct mechanisms and through a pathway distinguishable from the default sorting of a secreted GFP. After reaching the apoplast, sec-GFP-PMEI1 is stably accumulated in the cell wall, while PGIP2-GFP undergoes endocytic trafficking. Here we describe the final localization of PGIP2-GFP in the vacuole, evidenced by co-localization with the marker Aleu-RFP, and show a graphic elaboration of its sorting pattern. A working model taking into consideration the presence of a regulated apoplast-targeted secretion pathway is proposed.Key words: cell wall trafficking, endocytosis, GPI-anchor, PGIP2, PMEI1, secretion pathway, vacuole fluorescent markerCell wall biogenesis, growth, differentiation and remodeling, as well as wall-related signaling and defense responses depend on the functionality of the secretory pathway. Matrix polysaccharides, synthesized in the Golgi stacks, and cell wall proteins, synthesized in the ER, are packaged into secretory vesicles that fuse with the plasma membrane (PM) releasing their cargo into the cell wall. Also the synthesis and deposition of cellulose itself are driven by the endomembrane system which controls the assembly, within the Golgi, and the export to the plasma membrane of rosette complexes of cellulose synthase.¹ Secretion to the cell wall has always been considered a default pathway² but recent studies have evidenced a complex regulation of wall component trafficking that does not seem to follow the default secretion model. Recent evidence that several cell wall proteins are retained in the Golgi stacks until specific signals at the N-terminal domain are proteolitically removed is a case in point.^3–5 Moreover, it has previously been reported that secretion of exogenous marker proteins (secGFP and secRGUS) and cell wall polysaccharides reach the PM through different pathways.⁶ More recently, we have reported that cell wall protein trafficking also occurs through mechanisms distinguishable from that of a secreted GFP suggesting that more complex events than the mechanisms of bulk flow control cell wall growth and differentiation.⁷ To follow cell wall protein trafficking we used a Phaseolus vulgaris polygalacturonase inhibitor protein (PGIP2) and an Arabidopsis pectin methylesterase inhibitor protein (PMEI1) fused to GFP (PGIP2-GFP and secGFP-PMEI1). Both apoplastic proteins are involved in the remodeling of pectin network with different mechanisms. PGIP2 specifically inhibits exogenous fungal polygalacturonases (PGs) and is involved in the plant defense mechanisms against pathogenic fungi.^8,9 PMEI1 counteracts endogenous PME and takes part in the physiological synthesis and remodeling of the cell wall during growth and differentiation.^10,11 The specific functions of the two apoplastic proteins seem to be strictly related to the distinct mechanisms that control their secretion and stability in the cell wall. In fact, while secGFP-PMEI1 moves through ER and Golgi stacks linked to a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor, PGIP2-GFP moves as a cargo soluble protein. Furthermore, secGFP-PMEI1 is stably accumulated in the cell wall, while PGIP2-GFP, over the time, is internalized into endosomes and targeted to vacuole, likely for degradation. After reaching the cell wall, the different fate of the two proteins seems to be strictly related to the presence/absence of their physiological counteractors. PMEI regulates the demethylesterification of homogalacturonan by inhibiting pectin methyl esterase (PME) activity through the formation of a reversible 1:1 complex which is stable in the acidic cell wall environment.¹² Stable wall localization of PMEI1 is likely related to its interaction with endogenous PME, always present in the wall. Unlike PMEs, fungal polygalacturonases (PGs), the physiological interactors of PGIP2, are present in the cell wall only during a pathogen attack. The absence of PGs may determine PGIP2 internalization. Internalization events have been already reported for PM proteins,^13–16 while cell wall protein internalization is surely a less well-known event. To date, only internalization of an Arabidopsis pollen-specific PME^4,5,17 and PGIP2 ⁷ has been reported.To further confirm the internalization of PGIP2-GFP and its final localization into the vacuole, we constructed a red fluorescent variant (RFP) of the green fluorescent marker protein that accumulates in lytic or acidic vacuole because of the barley aleurain sorting determinants (Aleu-RFP).¹⁸ The localization of PGIP2-GFP was compared to that of Aleu-RFP by confocal microscopy in tobacco protoplasts transiently expressing both fusions. Sixty hours after transformation, PGIP2-GFP labeled the central vacuole as indicated by complete co-localization with the vacuolar marker (Fig. 1A–D). Instead, at the same time point, secGFP-PMEI1 still labeled the cell wall (Fig. 1E–H) and never reached the vacuolar compartment. To summarize PGIP2-GFP secretion pattern, a graphic elaboration of confocal images is reported describing the sorting of PGIP2GFP in tobacco protoplast (Fig. 1I). The protein transits through the endomembrane system (green) and reaches the cell wall which is rapidly regenerating as evidenced by immunostaining with the red monoclonal antibody JIM7 that binds to methylesterified pectins.¹⁹ PGIP2-GFP is then internalized in endosomes, labeled in yellow because of the co-localization with the styryl dye FM4-64, a red marker of the endocytic pathway.Open in a separate windowFigure 1PGIP2-GFP, but not secGFP-PMEI1, is internalized and reaches the vacuole in tobacco leaf protoplasts. (A) Approximately 60 h after transformation, PGIP2-GFP labeled the central vacuole as indicated by co-localization with the vacuole marker Aleu-RFP (B). (C) Merged image of (A and B). (D) Differential interference contrast (DIC) image of (A–C). On the contrary, secGFP-PMEI1 still labeled cell wall (E). (F) No co-localization is present in the vacuole labeled by Aleu-RFP. (G) Merged image of (E and F). (H) DIC image of (E–G). (I) Graphic elaboration of confocal images describing the sorting of PGIP2. The protein is sorted by the endomembrane system (green) to the cell wall (red) that is regenerated by the protoplast. Lacking the specific ligand, it is then internalized in endosome (yellow). Details are reported in the text.In Figure 2 we propose a model of the mechanism of secGFP-PMEI1 and PGIP2-GFP secretion derived from the different lines of evidence previously reported in reference ⁷. SecGFPPMEI1 (Fig. 2-1), but not PGIP2-GFP (Fig. 2-2), carries a GPI-anchor, required for its secretion to the cell wall. When the anchorage of GPI is inhibited by mannosamine (Fig. 2-a) or by the fusion of GFP to the C-terminus of PMEI1 (Fig. 2-b), the two non-anchored proteins accumulate in the Golgi stacks. Evidence of retention in Golgi stacks has already been reported for other two cell wall proteins.^3–5 Unlike secGFP-PMEI1, PGIP2-GFP is not stably accumulated in the cell wall and undergoes endocytic trafficking (Fig. 2-3). PGIP2-GFP internalization, likely due to the absence of PGs, might also be related with its ability to interact with homogalacturonan and oligogalacturonides,²⁰ which have been reported to internalize^21,22 (Fig. 2-4). Since SYP 121, a Qa-SNARE, is involved in the default secretion of secGFP,²³ but not in secretion of PGIP2-GFP and secGFP-PMEI1, trafficking mechanisms underlying secretion into the apoplast are likely different from those underlying the default route (Figs. 2-5). Taken as a whole, evidence suggests the existence of currently undefined signals that control apoplast-targeted secretion.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Schematic illustration for secGFP-PMEI1 and PGIP2-GFP trafficking. See text for details.     

Glutathione signaling acts through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway to mitigate biotic stress

Glutathione (GSH) has widely been known to be a multifunctional molecule especially as an antioxidant up until now, but has found a new role in plant defense signaling. Research from the past three decades indicate that GSH is a player in pathogen defense in plants, but the mechanism underlying this has not been elucidated fully. We have recently shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule and mitigates biotic stress through non-expressor of PR genes 1 (NPR1)-dependent salicylic acid (SA)-mediated pathway. Transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH (NtGB lines) was found to synthesize more SA, was capable of enhanced expression of genes belonging to NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway, were resistant to Pseudomonas syringae, the biotrophic pathogen and many SA-related proteins were upregulated. These results gathered experimental evidence on the mechanism through which GSH combats biotic stress. In continuation with our previous investigation we show here that the expression of glutathione S-transferase (GST), the NPR1-independent SA-mediated gene was unchanged in transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH as compared to wild-type plants. Additionally, the transgenic plants were barely resistant to Botrytis cinerea, the necrotrophic pathogen. SA-treatment led to enhanced level of expression of pathogenesis-related protein gene (PR1) and PR4 as against short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family protein (SDRLP) and allene oxide synthase (AOS). These data provided significant insight into the involvement of GSH in NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway in mitigating biotic stress.Key words: GSH, signaling molecule, biotrophic pathogen, NPR-1, PR-1, PR-4, transgenic tobaccoPlant responses to different environmental stresses are achieved through integrating shared signaling networks and mediated by the synergistic or antagonistic interactions with the phytohormones viz. SA, jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), abscisic acid (ABA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS).¹ Previous studies have shown that in response to pathogen attack, plants produce a highly specific blend of SA, JA and ET, resulting in the activation of distinct sets of defense-related genes.^2,3 Regulatory functions for ROS in defense, with a focus on the response to pathogen infection occur in conjunction with other plant signaling molecules, particularly with SA and nitric oxide (NO).^4–6 Till date, numerous physiological functions have been attributed to GSH in plants.^7–11 In addition to previous studies, recent study has also shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule in combating biotic stress through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway.^12,13Our recent investigation involved raising of transgenic tobacco overexpressing gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-ECS), the rate-limiting enzyme of the GSH biosynthetic pathway.¹² The stable integration and enhanced expression of the transgene at the mRNA as well as protein level was confirmed by Southern blot, quantitative RT-PCR and western blot analysis respectively. The transgenic plants of the T₂ generation (Fig. 1), the phenotype of which was similar to that of wild-type plants were found to be capable of synthesizing enhanced amount of GSH as confirmed by HPLC analysis.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Transgenic tobacco of T₂ generation, (A) three-week-old plant, (B) mature plant.In the present study, the expression profile of GST was analyzed in NtGB lines by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and found that the expression level of this gene is unchanged in NtGB lines as compared to wild-type plants (Fig. 2). GST is known to be a NPR1-independent SA-related gene.¹⁴ This suggests that GSH does not follow the NPR1-independent SA-mediated pathway in defense signaling.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Expression pattern of GST in wild-type and NtGB lines.Disease test assay with NtGB lines and wild-type plants was performed using B. cinerea and the NtGB lines showed negligible rate of resistance to this necrotrophic pathogen (Fig. 3). SA signaling has been known to control defense against biotrophic pathogen in contrast, JA/ET signaling controls defense against necrotrophic pathogen.^1,15 Thus it has again been proved that GSH is not an active member in the crosstalk of JA-mediated pathway, rather it follows the SA-mediated pathway as has been evidenced earlier.¹²Open in a separate windowFigure 3Resistance pattern of wild-type and NtGB lines against Botrytis cinerea.Additionally, the leaves of wild-type and NtGB lines were treated with 1 mM SA and the expression of PR1, SDRLP, AOS and PR4 genes were analyzed and compared to untreated plants to simulate pathogen infection. The expression of PR1 increased after exogenous application of SA. In case of PR4, the ET marker, the expression level increased in NtGB lines. On the other hand, the level of SDRLP was nearly the same. However, the expression of AOS was absent in SA-treated leaves (Fig. 4). PR1 has been known to be induced by SA-treatment¹⁶ which can be corroborated with our results. In addition, ET is known to enhance SA/NPR1-dependent defense responses,¹⁷ which was reflected in our study as well. AOS, the biosynthetic pathway gene of JA, further known to be the antagonist of SA, was downregulated in SA-treated plants.Open in a separate windowFigure 4Gene expression pattern of PR1, SDRLP, PR4 and AOS in untreated and SA-treated wildtype and NtGB lines.Taken together, it can be summarized that this study provided new evidence on the involvement of GSH with SA in NPR1-dependent manner in combating biotic stress. Additionally, it can be claimed that GSH is a signaling molecule which takes an active part in the cross-communication with other established signaling molecules like SA, JA, ET in induced defense responses and has an immense standpoint in plant defense signaling.     

Negative effects of desiccation on the protein sorting and post-translational modification

Bryophytes as the first land plants are believed to have colonized the land from a fresh water origin, requiring adaptive mechanisms that survival of dehydration. Physcomitrella patens is such a non-vascular bryophyte and shows rare desiccation tolerance in its vegetative tissues. Previous studies showed that during the course of dehydration, several related processes are set in motion: plasmolysis, chloroplast remodeling and microtubule depolymerization. And proteomic alteration supported the cellular structural changes in respond to desiccation stress.¹ In this addendum, we report that Golgi bodies are absent and adaptor protein complex AP-1 large subunit is downregulated during the course of dehydration. Those phenomena may be adverse in protein posttranslational modification, protein sorting and cell walls synthesis under the desiccation condition.Key words: AP-1 protein, cell ultrastructure, desiccation, golgi bodies, physcomitrella, proteomeThe plant Golgi apparatus is composed of many small stacks of cisternae, sometimes known as dictyosomes. The Golgi is a complex polarized organelle consisting of both a cis and trans side, containing compartments with functionally different capacities for directing cellular components. The plant Golgi apparatus synthesis a wide range of cell wall polysaccharides and proteoglycans, and also carries out O-linked glycosylation and N-linked glycan processing.^2–5 Moreover, the Golgi is involved in returning escaped proteins back to the endoplasmic reticulum, sorting of proteins and polysaccharides to the cell wall or vacuoles, and in organizing the compartmentation of its own enzymes by retention or retrieval mechanisms.⁶ In conclusion, The Golgi apparatus is central to the growth and division of the plant cell through its roles in protein glycosylation, protein sorting and cell wall synthesis.The transit of proteins and lipids from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and the plasma membrane to endosomes within eucaryotic cells occurs via the budding and fusion of clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs).^7,8 At the TGN, this process is mediated by the heterotetrameric AP-1 adaptor complex, which consists of two large subunits, β and γ1; a medium subunit, µ1; and a small σ1 subunit. Recruitment of AP-1 to the TGN membrane is regulated by a small GTPase, ADP-ribosylation factor 1 (ARF1), which cycles between an inactive GDP-bound form in cytosol and an active GTP-bound form that associates with the membrane like other small GTPase.⁹ There is also evidence that phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events are involved in the regulation of the function of AP-1. Ghosh and Kornfeld demostrated that AP-1 recruitment onto the membrane is associated with protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A)-mediated dephosphorylation of its β1 subunit, which enables clathrin assembly. This Golgi-associated isoform of PP2A exhibits specificity for phosphorylated β1 compared with phosphorylated µ1. Once on the membrane, the µ1 subunit undergoes phosphorylation, which results in a conformation change. This conformational change is associated with increased binding to sorting signals on the cytoplasmic tails of cargo molecules. Dephosphorylation of µ1 (and µ2) by another PP2A-like phosphatase reversed the effect and resulted in adaptor release from CCVs. Cyclical phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of the subunits of AP-1 regulate its function from membrane recruitment until its release into cytosol.¹⁰Plants experience desiccation stress either as part of a developmental programme, such as during seed maturation, or because of reductions in air humid and water availability in the soil. Underlying the ability of bryophytes to withstand periods of desiccation are morphological and biochemical adaptations. Plants respond to stress as individual cells and synergistically as a whole organism. Scanning electron microscopy observation showed that the P. patens gametophore cells were shrunk upon the treatment of desiccation, and the shrinking started from the edge of the leaves (Fig. 1). We could clearly observe some dark granula in the untreated cells, but these granula disappeared post-desiccation treatment (Fig. 1). Transmission electron microscopy also revealed that the large stacks of Golgi bodies and numerous coated vesicles are typically visible in the hydrated cells (Fig. 2), but these are absent in the desiccative cells (data not shown). The plant Golgi apparatus plays an important role in protein glycosylation and sorting. Therefore, this event means that the protein sorting and the cargo transporting are disrupted by desiccation stress. During desiccation, the absentness of Golgi bodies reduce the leaf activities of cell, and this is expected to similar to plant dormancy which is a phenomenon in resurrection plants and some drought-tolerant plants. In addition, through two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and LC-MS/MS analysis, AP-1 large subunit was identified as downregulated protein during the course of dehydration (Fig. 3). AP-1 is ubiquitously expressed and participates in the budding of clathrin-coated vesicles from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and endosomes. AP-1 also recognizes sorting motifs in cargo molecules. Our results suggested that desiccation led to a marked disrupt in protein posttranslational modification, protein sorting and cell walls synthesis.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Scanning Electron microscopy images of normal and dehydrated P. patens gametophores. (A) the fresh leaf; (B) enlargement of the rectangle area of (A); (C) dehydrated gametophores of P. patens. Bar = 5 µm.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Transmission electron microscopy images of cell in fresh game-tophores. The arrows indicate Golgi body, Bar = 2 µm.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Part protein profile of the control and desiccation plants. The arrows indicate the AP-1 large subunit.     

Thigmomorphogenesis in Solanum lycopersicum: Morphological and biochemical responses in stem after mechanical stimulation

The activation of the phenylpropanoid pathway in plants by environmental stimuli is one of the most universal biochemical stress responses known. In tomato plant, rubbing applied to a young internode inhibit elongation of the rubbed internode and his neighboring one. These morphological changes were correlated with an increase in lignification enzyme activities, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) and peroxidases (POD), 24 hours after rubbing of the forth internode. Furthermore, a decrease in indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) content was detected in the rubbed internode and the upper one. Taken together, our results suggest that decrease in rubbed internode length is a consequence of IAA oxidation, increases in enzyme activities (PAL, CAD and POD), and cell wall rigidification associated with induction of lignification process.Key words: Mechanical stimulation, PAL, CAD, POD, IAAIn their environment, plants are constantly submitted to several stimuli such as wind, rain and wounding. The growth response of plants to such stimuli was termed thigmomorphogenesis and was observed in a wide range of plants.^1–3 The most common thigmomorphogenetic response is a retardation of tissue elongation accompanied by an increase in thickness.⁴ The plant response to mechanical perturbation is mainly restricted to the young developing internode, since no influence can be detected when the internode has reached its final length.^5,6 These plant growth modifications, which characterize thigmomorphogenesis, are related to biochemical events associated with lignification process⁷ and ethylene production.^8,9In tomato plant the length of internodes 4 (N4) and 5 (N5) was measured 14 days after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results reported in Figure 1 show that rubbing led to a significant reduction of elongation of the stressed internode (N4) (decrease of N4 length from 4.3 cm in the control plant to 2.9 in the rubbed one). This effect was not limited to the rubbed area but affected also the elongation of the neighboring internodes (N5) that were shorter in rubbed plants than in control ones.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Internode lengths of control and rubbed plants measured 14 day after mechanical stress applied to the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Results reported in Figure 2 show an increase in PAL activity in both internodes N4 and N5, 24 hours after mechanical stress application as compared with corresponding controls. CAD activity was also investigated in N4 and N5, 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results presented in Figure 3 show that mechanical stress application induces a strong increase of CAD activity in the rubbed internode N4 (5.3 nkatal μg-1 protein) with an approximately two-fold increase when compared to control tomato internodes (2.3 nkatal μg-1 protein). Further, CAD activity in N5 was also increased in the rubbed internode (5.538 nkatal μg-1 protein) as compared with the control one (3.256 nkatal μg-1 protein).Open in a separate windowFigure 2PAL activity of internode 4, and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Open in a separate windowFigure 3CAD activity of internode 4, and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Syringaldazine (S-POD) and gaïacol (G-POD) peroxidase activities were measured in tomato N4 and N5. Results reported in Figure 4 show an increase in soluble peroxidase activity with both substrates in the rubbed internode N4 as compared with control plant. Enhancement in peroxidase activities in N4 was more pronounced with gaïacol (80.7 U) as an electron donor than syringaldazine (33.8 U). Similar results were observed in internode 5 as compared with control one (Fig. 4).Open in a separate windowFigure 4(A) Syringaldazine-POD (Syr-POD) activity of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars. (B) Gaiacol-POD (G-POD) activity of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.IAA was quantified in control and rubbed plant internodes 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results reported in figure 5 show that in control sample and as expected, the content of IAA was found to be higher in the younger internode (N5) as compared to the older one (N4). Rubbing led to a significant decrease in IAA levels in N4 (5.06 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹) as compared with corresponding controls (7.27 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹). Similar results were observed in internode 5, where IAA content was reduced from 16.52 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹ in control internode to 12.35 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹ in the rubbed internode (Fig. 5).Open in a separate windowFigure 5IAA Level of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.The results reported here establish an evident correlation between growth limitation of the rubbed internode and their degree of lignification, the increase in lignification enzymes activities and auxin degradation after mechanical stress application.Auxin seems to be involved in thigmomorphogenesis.¹⁰ It was proposed that MIS (Mechanically-induced stress) has opposite effects on auxin levels in the two species studied to date, Phaseolus vulgaris¹⁰ and Bryonia dioica.^11,12 Auxin level as measured by bioassay, increased in Phaseolus vulgaris following rubbing of the stem.¹⁰ It was proposed that a build up of auxin may result from the reduced polar transport of IAA at the rubbed internode, causing a build up of IAA in the stem tissue. Exogenous IAA did not reverse the MIS inhibition of growth in Phaseolus vulgaris and high levels of IAA retarded growth in non-stressed plants.¹⁰ Thus, retardation of extension growth in Phaseolus vulgaris may have been caused by high levels of endogenous auxin and the increase in stem diameter by increased ethylene production.⁴ However, ethylene increases radial growth only if auxin is present.¹³Boyer¹¹ reported a decrease in auxinlike activity in Bryonia dioica following MIS and this was confirmed in the same species by Hofinger et al.¹² who reported a decrease in IAA using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Auxin catabolism was accompanied with changes in both soluble and ionically bound cell wall basic peroxidases¹⁴ and the appearance of an additional peroxidase. This can suggest that in Bryonia, auxin catabolism is hastened by mechanical stimulated peroxidase. In addition, Boyer et al.¹⁵ reported that lithium pre-treatment prevents both thigmomorphogenesis and appearance of specific cathodic isoperoxidase in Bryonia plants subjected to MIS. This is give further credence to the possibility that the peroxidase-auxin system is involved in Bryonia thigmomorphogenesis. In addition, ethylene increases peroxidase activity which reduces the auxin content in the tissue to a level low enough not to support normal growth. We have evidence that decrease of auxin level contribute to mechanism leading to tomato internode inhibition subjected to mechanical stress.Growth inhibition has been suggested to be the result of tissues lignification.⁶ As the initial enzyme in the monolignol biosynthesis pathway, PAL has a direct influence on lignin accumulation.¹⁶ The characteristics of lignin differ among cell wall tissues and plant organs.¹⁷ It comprises polyphenolic polymers derived from the oxidative polymerization of different monolignols, including p-coumaryl, coniferyl and sinapyl alcohols via a side pathway of phenylalanine metabolism leading to lignin synthesis.¹⁸ The increase in lignin content in the rubbed tomato internode could be a response mechanism to mechanical damage caused by rubbing.³ It is known that plants create a natural barrier that includes lignin and suberin synthesis, components directly linked to support systems.^19,20The increase in lignin content of rubbed tomato internode³ is paralleled by a rise in CAD activity and whilst such direct proportionality between CAD activity and lignin accumulation does not always agree with the results in the literature, it clearly is responding in ways similar to those of the other enzymes in the pathway.²¹Mechanical stress-induced membrane depolarization would generate different species of free radicals and peroxides, which in turn initiate lipid peroxidation.²² The degradation of cell membranes is suggested to bring about rapid changes in ionic flux, especially release of K⁺ which would result in an enhanced endogenous Ca/K ratio and in leakage of solutes, among them electron donors such as ascorbic acid and phenolic substances. The increased intracellular relative calcium level activated secretion of basic peroxidases²³ into the free space where, in association with the electron donors and may be with the circulating IAA, they eliminate the peroxides, and facilitated binding of basic peroxidases to membrane structures allowing a role as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)-oxidases. The resulting IAA and ACC oxidase-mediated changes in ethylene production²⁴ would further induce (this time through the protein synthesis machinery) an increase in activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and peroxidases. The resulting lignification and cell wall rigidification determines the growth response of tomato internode to the mechanical stress.     

Sugar signaling of fructan metabolism: New insights on protein phosphatases in sucrose-fed wheat leaves

Protein phosphatase type 2A (PP2A) activity is required for the sucrose induction of fructan metabolism in wheat leaves, as shown in experiments with the addition of the specific inhibitor okadaic acid (OA) together with sucrose. However, a decrease in total PP2A activity has been found along sucrose treatment. Here we analyze the effect of sucrose feeding to wheat leaves on PP2A activity profiles after Deae-Sephacel and Superose separation, in comparison with those of control leaves. The results show no evidence of changes in PP2A activity profiles as a consequence of sucrose feeding. In all, our data suggest that constitutive levels of PP2A activity may be sufficient for the sucrose-mediated induction of fructan metabolism and that general decrease of PP2A activity produced by long-term treatment with sucrose may be due to a negative feedback regulation.Key words: fructan, protein phosphatases 2A, sucrose:fructan 6-fructosyltransferase, sugar sensing, Triticum aestivumProtein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation are necessary for the sugar-mediated induction of fructan synthesizing enzymes (FSS, 6-sucrose:fructan fructosyltransferase and 1-sucrose:sucrose fructosyltransferase);^1,2 specifically, CDPK and PP2A activities are required for this process. Recently, we also showed that sucrose decreases general PP2A activity in parallel with a decreasing sugar uptake and that PP2A is involved in sugar uptake in wheat leaves.³ Very little is known about PP2A isoforms in wheat, as well as about the number of their encoding sequences.^4–6 Here we discuss further the role of PP2A in sugar sensing and possible causes of the effect of sucrose on PP2A activity in wheat.The fact that PP2A activity is necessary for fructan induction by sucrose while a decrease in total PP2A activity occurs along sucrose treatment,³ led us to investigate whether this could be the result of a modification of a specific PP2A activity. Then, we partially purified PP2A present in either sucrose- or water-treated leaves. Total protein leaf extracts from 6 h sugar treated or control (water treated) leaves were loaded onto Deae-Sephacel columns. Two major peaks of PP activity were obtained (named PP2AI and PP2AII). Sugar treatment modified the elution position of both PP activities: in the case of sucrose-treated leaf extracts, PP2AI and PP2AII eluted at 260 mM and 375 mM NaCl, respectively, and when control leaf extracts were chromatographed, PP2AI and PP2AII eluted at 345 mM and 430 mM NaCl, respectively. PP2AII activity was higher than that of PP2AI for wheat leaves treated either with sucrose or water. The specific activity for the concentrated proteins were c.a. 30 nmol/min/mg protein and 110 nmol/min/mg protein for PP2AI and PP2AII, respectively for the sucrose treatment (Fig. 1A). Incubating leaves for 24 h with sucrose or water rendered essentially the same activity profile as for 6 h. The fractions under each Deae-Sephacel peak were pooled, concentrated and loaded into Superose-12 size-exclusion columns. The elution pattern of these chromatographies showed two peaks from each peak eluted from the Deae-Sephacel column, designated as PP2AIa, PP2AIb, PP2AIIa and PP2AIIb for both treatments (Fig. 1B). They corresponded to an approximately 120–130 kDa and 30–35 kDa proteins, which are in accordance to the molecular weight of the PP2A core and the PP2A catalytic subunit, respectively.^7,8 PP2AIb activity was higher than that of PP2AIa and PP2AIIa activity was higher than that of PP2AIIb for both treatments. In comparison with PP2A isolated from other tissues, wheat leaf PP2A specific activities were similar to PP2A purified from wheat embryo and from maize seedlings.^4,9Open in a separate windowFigure 1Elution profiles of wheat leaves PP2A activity. Crude extracts from leaves treated for 6 h with water (control) or 0.5 M sucrose were loaded onto Deae-Sephacel columns. Elutions were done with a linear gradient of NaCl 0-0.5 M (A). PP-containing fractions from water-(—◯—) or sucrose-(—•—) fed leaves were concentrated (PP2AI and PP2AII peaks) and loaded onto Superose 12 columns (B). PP2A activity was assayed with the non-radioactive method. Lines without markers at the left of the graph indicate total protein for water (——) and sucrose (—) treatments.To characterize the partially purified PPs we tested their activity on phosphopeptide RR(pT)VA, which is substrate for Ser/Thr PP2A but is a poor substrate of PP1 (Fig. 2A). Also, to ensure that we measured specific PP2A activities we included imidazole and EDTA in the reaction buffer, to inhibit alkaline phosphatases and PP2B and PP2C activity.¹⁰ Moreover, purified enzymes were active with the general substrate p-NPP. In contrast, these PPs did not catalyze the dephosphorylation of nonprotein phosphomonoesters such as Glc-6P or PEP at substrate concentration (100 µM). Finally, partially purified PP activities were assayed with different reported effectors of animal and plant PP2A. OA, a potent inhibitor of PP2A activity, completely inhibited the purified PPs at 10 nM. The OA IC₅₀ value was 1 nM (Fig. 2B), which is in the normal range of values described for PP2As.¹⁰ They were also inhibited by the general phosphatase inhibitor NaF but not by inhibitor 2 (I-2), which inhibits PP1 specifically.¹⁰ Thus, the PP activities that we partially purified belong to the PP2A family.Open in a separate windowFigures 2Phosphopeptide concentration-dependent and okadaic acid sensitivity of the sucrose-partially purified wheat PP2As. The pooled fractions of Superose 12 chromatographies with PP2A activity were incubated with different concentration of the phosphopeptide (A) or with different concentrations of OA (B). PP2A activity was assayed with the non-radioactive method.These results are in accordance with the proposed model,³ where PP activity may be required for sucrose uptake into leaf tissues,¹¹ and possibly also for maintaining this transporter in a dephosphorylatedactive form.¹² Within this scheme, PP2A activity required to initiate sucrose signaling leading to fructan synthesis induction is present before the signal. On the long term, sucrose may decrease general PP2A activity in a negative feedback.³ Moreover, further steps in the sucrose signaling pathway may require PP2A activity, since adding 1 µM OA 6 h after the beginning of sucrose feeding (when most sucrose uptake had already taken place, and both 6-SFT mRNA level and FSS activity had significantly increased), blocks any further increase in FSS activity (Martínez-Noël et al. unpublished). Further research is needed to elucidate whether the different PP2A isoforms here described are associated with different steps in this signaling process.