Regulation of SUP expression identifies multiple regulators involved in arabidopsis floral meristem development

During the course of flower development, floral homeotic genes are expressed in defined concentric regions of floral meristems called whorls. The SUPERMAN (SUP, also called FLO10) gene, which encodes a C2H2-type zinc finger protein, is involved in maintenance of the stamen/carpel whorl boundary (the boundary between whorl 3 and whorl 4) in Arabidopsis. Here, we show that the regulation of SUP expression in floral meristems is complex, consisting of two distinct phases, initiation and maintenance. The floral meristem identity gene LEAFY (LFY) plays a role in the initiation phase through at least two pathways, which differ from each other in the involvement of two homeotic genes, APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI). AP3, PI, and another homeotic gene, AGAMOUS (AG), are further required for SUP expression in the later maintenance phase. Aside from these genes, there are other as yet unidentified genes that control both the temporal and spatial patterns of SUP expression in whorl 3 floral meristems. SUP appears to act transiently, probably functioning to trigger a genetic circuit that creates the correct position of the whorl 3/whorl 4 boundary.     

Mutations in the polycomb group gene polyhomeotic lead to epithelial instability in both the ovary and wing imaginal disc in Drosophila

Background

Most human cancers originate from epithelial tissues and cell polarity and adhesion defects can lead to metastasis. The Polycomb-Group of chromatin factors were first characterized in Drosophila as repressors of homeotic genes during development, while studies in mammals indicate a conserved role in body plan organization, as well as an implication in other processes such as stem cell maintenance, cell proliferation, and tumorigenesis. We have analyzed the function of the Drosophila Polycomb-Group gene polyhomeotic in epithelial cells of two different organs, the ovary and the wing imaginal disc.

Results

Clonal analysis of loss and gain of function of polyhomeotic resulted in segregation between mutant and wild-type cells in both the follicular and wing imaginal disc epithelia, without excessive cell proliferation. Both basal and apical expulsion of mutant cells was observed, the former characterized by specific reorganization of cell adhesion and polarity proteins, the latter by complete cytoplasmic diffusion of these proteins. Among several candidate target genes tested, only the homeotic gene Abdominal-B was a target of PH in both ovarian and wing disc cells. Although overexpression of Abdominal-B was sufficient to cause cell segregation in the wing disc, epistatic analysis indicated that the presence of Abdominal-B is not necessary for expulsion of polyhomeotic mutant epithelial cells suggesting that additional POLYHOMEOTIC targets are implicated in this phenomenon.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that polyhomeotic mutations have a direct effect on epithelial integrity that can be uncoupled from overproliferation. We show that cells in an epithelium expressing different levels of POLYHOMEOTIC sort out indicating differential adhesive properties between the cell populations. Interestingly, we found distinct modalities between apical and basal expulsion of ph mutant cells and further studies of this phenomenon should allow parallels to be made with the modified adhesive and polarity properties of different types of epithelial tumors.     

Regulation of Krüppel expression in the anlage of the Malpighian tubules in the Drosophila embryo

The expression of most Drosophila segmentation genes is not limited to the early blastoderm stage, when the segmental anlagen are determined. Rather, these genes are often expressed in a variety of organs and tissues at later stages of development. In contrast to the early expression, little is known about the regulatory interactions that govern the later expression patterns. Among other tissues, the central gap gene Krüppel is expressed and required in the anlage of the Malpighian tubules at the posterior terminus of the embryo. We have studied the interaction of Krüppel with other terminal genes. The gap genes tailles and huckebein, which repress Krüppel in the central segmentation domain, activate Krüppel expression in the posterior Malpighian tubule domain. The opposite effect on the posterior Krüppel expression is achieved by the interposition of another factor, the homeotic gene fork head, which is not involved in the control of the central domain. In addition, Krüppel activates different genes in the Malpighian tubules than in the central domain. Thus, both the regulation and the function of Krüppel in the Malpighian tubules differ strikingly from its role in segmentation.     

Homeotic gene expression in the locust Schistocerca: An antibody that detects conserved epitopes in ultrabithorax and abdominal-A proteins

To investigate what role homeotic genes may play in morphological evolution, we are comparing homeotic gene expression in two very different insects, Drosophila (Diptera) and Schistocerca (Orthoptera). In this paper we describe a monoclonal antibody, FP6.87, that recognizes the products of both the Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and abdominal-A (abd-A) genes in Drosophila, via an epitope common to the carboxy terminal region of these two proteins. This antibody recognizes nuclear antigens present in the posterior thorax and abdomen of Schistocerca. We infer that it recognizes the Schistocerca homolog of UBX protein, and probably also of ABD-A. As the distribution of Schistocerca ABD-A protein is already known, we can use this reagent to map the expression of Schistocerca UBX in the thorax and anterior abdomen, where ABD-A is not expressed. Both the general domain, and many of the details, of UBX exp ression are remarkably conserved compared with Drosophila. Thus UBX expression extends back from T2 in the ectoderm (including the CNS), but only from A1 in the mesoderm. As noted for other bithorax complex genes in Schistocerca, expression begins in the abdomen, at or shortly before the time of segmentation. It only later spreads anteriorly to the thorax. For much of embryogene-sis, the expression of UBX in the thoracic epidermis is largely restricted to the T3 limb. Inthis limb, UBX is strikingly regulated, in a complex pattern that reflects limb segmentation. Reviewing these and earlier observations, we conclude that evolutionary changes affect both the precise regulation of homeotic genes within segments, and probably also the spectrum of downstream genes that respond to homeotic gene expression in a given tissue. Overall domains of homeotic gene expression appear to be well conserved between different insect groups, though a change in the extent and timing of homeotic gene expression may underlie the modification of the posterior abdomen in different insect groups. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Mutations in somePolycomb group genes ofDrosophila interfere with regulation of segmentation genes

Mutations in severalPolycomb (Pc) group genes cause maternal-effect or zygotic segmentation defects, suggesting thatPc group genes may regulate the segmentation genes ofDrosophila. We show that individuals doubly heterozygous for mutations inpolyhomeotic and six otherPc group genes show gap, pair rule, and segment polarity segmentation defects. We examined double heterozygous combinations ofPc group and segmentation mutations for enhancement of adult and embryonic segmentation defects.Posterior sex combs andpolyhomeotic interact withKrüppel ² and enhance embryonic phenotypes ofhunchback andknirps, andpolyhomeotic enhanceseven-skipped. Surprisingly, flies carrying duplications ofextra sex combs (esc), that were heterozygous for mutations ofeven-skipped (eve), were extremely subvital. Embryos and surviving adults of this genotype showed strong segmentation defects in even-numbered segments. Antibody studies confirm that expression ofeve is suppressed by duplications ofesc. However,esc duplications have no effect on other gap or pair rule genes tested. To our knowledge, this is only the second triplo-abnormal phenotype associated withPc group genes. Duplications of nine otherPc group genes have no detectable effect oneve. Expression ofengrailed (en) was abnormal in the central nervous systems of mostPc group mutants. These results support a role forPc genes in regulation of some segmentation genes, and suggest thatesc may act differently from otherPc group genes.     

Polyhomeotic: A gene of Drosophila melanogaster required for correct expression of segmental identity

Summary A new locus in Drosophila melanogaster that is required for the correct expression of segmental identity has been discovered. The new locus, termed polyhomeotic (ph), is X-linked and maps cytologically to bands 2D2-3. Homozygous ph flies have homeotic transformations similar to those of known dominant gain of function mutants in the Antennapedia and bithorax complexes (ANT-C, BX-C), and in addition show loss of the humerus. ph interacts with three other similar mutations: Polycomb (Pc), Polycomblike (Pcl), and extra sex comb (esc), and acts as a dominant enhancer of Pc. The expression of ph depends on the ANT-C and BX-C dosage. ph has no embryonic phenotype, but temperature shift studies on ph ² show that the ph ⁺ product is required during embryogenesis and larval development. We propose that ph mutants in some way disrupt the normal expression of the ANT-C and BX-C, and, therefore, that ph ⁺ is needed for maintenance of segmental identity.     

Minimal regions in the Arabidopsis PISTILLATA promoter responsive to the APETALA3/PISTILLATA feedback control do not contain a CArG box

PISTILLATA (PI) is a floral homeotic B function gene in Arabidopsis and together with the other B function gene, APETALA3 (AP3), is involved in specifying petal and stamen identities. The expression of PI and AP3 is under similar developmental control. The initiation of AP3 and PI expression is at least partly caused by the floral meristem identity gene LEAFY, but the maintenance of AP3 and PI expression involves an autoregulatory loop requiring the activity of both genes. PI and AP3 are MADS domain proteins that form, and appear to function as, a heterodimer. AP3/PI binds in vitro to a sequence motif, CC(A/T)₆GG, a MADS domain protein consensus binding site also known as the CArG box. We identified a 481-bp PI promoter region that confers both the initiation and the maintenance of PI expression patterns. We further dissected the promoter and identified minimal regions responsible for the AP3/PI-dependent expression. No CArG box is present in these minimal regions, suggesting that either AP3/PI does not bind directly to the PI promoter for the maintenance control, or that it requires additional factors to bind to the PI promoter. Our results suggest that the mechanisms of regulation of the two B function genes, AP3 and PI, are different, because CArG boxes are present in the AP3 promoter and are necessary for the AP3 feedback control. Received: 1 March 2000 / Revision accepted: 15 June 2000     

Expression of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Pax group III</Emphasis> genes in the honeybee (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Apis mellifera</Emphasis>)

Pax group III genes are involved in a number of processes during insect segmentation. In Drosophila melanogaster, three genes, paired, gooseberry and gooseberry-neuro, regulate segmental patterning of the epidermis and nervous system. Paired acts as a pair-rule gene and gooseberry as a segment polarity gene. Studies of Pax group III genes in other insects have indicated that their expression is a good marker for understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms of segmentation. We have cloned three Pax group III genes from the honeybee (Apis mellifera) and examined their relationships to other insect Pax group III genes and their expression patterns during honeybee segmentation. The expression pattern of the honeybee homologue of paired is similar to that of paired in Drosophila, but its expression is modulated by anterior–posterior temporal patterning similar to the expression of Pax group III proteins in Tribolium. The expression of the other two Pax group III genes in the honeybee indicates that they also act in segmentation and nervous system development, as do these genes in other insects.     

Mutations in somePolycomb group genes ofDrosophila interfere with regulation of segmentation genes

Mutations in severalPolycomb (Pc) group genes cause maternal-effect or zygotic segmentation defects, suggesting thatPc group genes may regulate the segmentation genes ofDrosophila. We show that individuals doubly heterozygous for mutations inpolyhomeotic and six otherPc group genes show gap, pair rule, and segment polarity segmentation defects. We examined double heterozygous combinations ofPc group and segmentation mutations for enhancement of adult and embryonic segmentation defects.Posterior sex combs andpolyhomeotic interact withKrüppel ² and enhance embryonic phenotypes ofhunchback andknirps, andpolyhomeotic enhanceseven-skipped. Surprisingly, flies carrying duplications ofextra sex combs (esc), that were heterozygous for mutations ofeven-skipped (eve), were extremely subvital. Embryos and surviving adults of this genotype showed strong segmentation defects in even-numbered segments. Antibody studies confirm that expression ofeve is suppressed by duplications ofesc. However,esc duplications have no effect on other gap or pair rule genes tested. To our knowledge, this is only the second triplo-abnormal phenotype associated withPc group genes. Duplications of nine otherPc group genes have no detectable effect oneve. Expression ofengrailed (en) was abnormal in the central nervous systems of mostPc group mutants. These results support a role forPc genes in regulation of some segmentation genes, and suggest thatesc may act differently from otherPc group genes.     

Genetic Control of Early Embryogenesis in the Red Flour Beetle, Tribolium castaneum

SYNOPSIS. The power of genetic analysis possible with the fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster, has yielded a detailed understandingof pattern formation controlled by homeotic and segmentationgenes in early embryogenesis. We are studying the genetic regulationof embryogenesis in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum.The dynamic process of germ rudiment formation and sequentialsegmentation exhibited by Tribolium provides a context differentthan Drosophila within which to assess the function of homeoticand segmentation gene homologs. Our analyses of the genes inthe HOM-C suggest many similarities in structure and functionwith the well-characterized Drosophila genes. Abdominal resemblesits Drosophila homolog abdominal-A in functioning to establishsegmental identities in the abdomen, such that in each casemutations result in homeotic transformations to PS6. Althoughthe anterior functional boundary of abdominal-A homologs isprecisely conserved, the domain within which Abdominal is importantextends more posterior than that of abdominal-A. The final expression pattern of the segmentation gene engrailedin Tribolium is identical to Drosophila, suggesting that thesehomologs are involved in a conserved developmental process.However, as expected the development of that pattern is different;engrailed stripes anticipate the formation of each new segmentas they appear sequentially in the elongating germ band. Althoughthe grasshopper even-skipped and fushi tarazu homologs are notapparently important in segmentation, the expression patternsof the Tribolium homologs strongly suggest that they have gaineda role in segmentation in the lineage leading to beetles andflies. Nevertheless, differences between Tribolium and Drosophilain the dynamics of even-skipped expression and the fushi tarazumutant phenotype indicate divergence in the regulation and rolesof these genes.     

Expression of the polyhomeotic locus in development of Drosophila melanogaster

The polyhomeotic (ph) gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a chromatin protein required for negative regulation of homeotic genes, and is a member of the Polycomb group of genes. The distribution of ph mRNA and protein was determined in embryos, imaginal discs, and ovaries. Distribution of ph protein and mRNA coincided, except in early embryogogenesis. During blastoderm, ph mRNA is present in anterior and posterior domains that are themselves subdivided into stripes. During germ band extension, a segmentally repeated striped pattern of mRNA expression is seen. ph protein is first detected as a nuclear protein during cell cycle 10, and is ubiquitously expressed. ph protein stains more heavily in the ectodermal mitotic domains described by Foe (1989). Later, ph mRNA and protein expression is concentrated in the neuronal cell bodies of the central nervous system, and can also be detected in the peripheral nervous system. In imaginal discs, ph expression is non-uniform in metathoracic discs, but appears more regular in other imaginal discs. The ph mRNA is found in the germarium and in stages 1–10 in nurse cells and follicle cells, but we do not detect it in oocytes. These results are discussed with respect to the expression of Polycomb, and with respect to the function of the Polycomb group.     

UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS Controls Meristem Identity and Organ Primordia Fate in Arabidopsis

A novel gene that is involved in regulating flower initiation and development has been identified in Arabidopsis. This gene has been designated UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS (UFO), with five corresponding nuclear recessive alleles designated ufo[middot]1 to ufo[middot]5. Under short day-length conditions, ufo homozygotes generate more coflorescences than do the wild type, and coflorescences often appear apical to the first floral shoot, resulting in a period of inflorescence development in which regions of floral and coflorescence shoots are produced alternately. ufo enhances the phenotype of weak leafy alleles, and the double mutant Ufo-1 Apetala1-1 produces only coflorescence-like shoots, suggesting that these two genes control different aspects of floral initiation. Floral development was also altered in Ufo plants. Ufo flowers have an altered organ number in all whorls, and organs in the first, second, and third whorls exhibit variable homeotic transformations. Ufo single and double mutant phenotypes suggest that the floral changes result from reduction in class B floral homeotic gene expression and fluctuations in the expression boundaries of class C function and FLO10. Surprisingly, in situ hybridization analysis revealed no obvious differences in expression pattern or level in developing Ufo flowers compared with that of the wild type for any class B or C gene studied. We propose that UFO acts in concert with known floral initiation genes and regulates the domains of floral homeotic gene function.     

Regulation of Krüppel expression in the anlage of the Malpighian tubules in the Drosophila embryo

The expression of most Drosophila segmentation genes is not limited to the early blastoderm stage, when the segmental anlagen are determined. Rather, these genes are often expressed in a variety of organs and tissues at later stages of development. In contrast to the early expression, little is known about the regulatory interactions that govern the later expression patterns. Among other tissues, the central gap gene Krüppel is expressed and required in the anlage of the Malpighian tubules at the posterior terminus of the embryo. We have studied the interactions of Krüppel with other terminal genes. The gap genes tailless and huckebein, which repress Krüppel in the central segmentation domain, activate Krüppel expression in the posterior Malpighian tubule domain. The opposite effect on the posterior Krüppel expression is achieved by the interposition of another factor, the homeotic gene fork head, which is not involved in the control of the central domain. In addition, Krüppel activates different genes in the Malpighian tubules than in the central domain. Thus, both the regulation and the function of Krüppel in the Malpighian tubules differ strikingly from its role in segmentation.     

Homeotic gene expression in the wild-type and a homeotic mutant of the moth Manduca sexta

Antibodies were used to examine the expression patterns of Antennapedia (Antp), Ultrabithorax (Ubx), Ubx and abdominal-A combined(Ubx/abd-A),and Distalless (Dll) in the embryos of the moth Manduca sexta. We found that the spatial and temporal pattern of Antp expression in Manduca was correlated with the anterior migration of two patches of epithelium that include the anterior-most tracheal pits, and with the development of functional spiracles. Ubx expression showed an intricate pattern which suggests complex regulation during development. Throughout Manduca embryogenesis the expression of Ubx/Abd-A and Dll was similar to that reported for other insects. However, there was no apparent reduction in Ubx/Abd-A expression in the Manduca abdominal proleg primordia that expressed Dll. The expression of these four proteins was also examined in embryosof the Manduca homozygous homeotic mutant Octopod (Octo). The Octo mutation results in the transformation of A1 and A2 in the anterior direction, with homeotic legs appearing on A1 and occasionally A2. Our results suggest that in Octo animals there is a reduction in the level of Ubx protein expression throughout its domain. Based on homeotic gene expression in wild-type and mutant Manduca and in other insects, we discuss potential roles of homeotic genes in insect morphological evolution. Received: 21 September 1998 / Accepted: 5 March 1999