Captopril attenuates reflex adrenergic response in essential hypertension

An attenuation of adrenergic activity during the inhibition of endogenous angiotensin II formation was evaluated by determining plasma norepinephrine concentration after a single oral administration of captopril compared to that after nifedipine in essential hypertension. Captopril produced a fall in mean arterial pressure (-24 +/- 2 mmHg, p less than 0.01) which magnitude was the same as that gained by nifedipine (-22 +/- 3 mmHg, p less than 0.01). Reflex tachycardia due to hypotension was produced (+13 +/- 1 beats/min, p less than 0.01) after nifedipine but not after captopril (-1 +/- 2 beats/min, p greater than 0.05). Although the enhancement of plasma renin activity induced by captopril (+1.54 +/- 0.56 ng/ml/hr, p less than 0.05) was similar (p greater than 0.05) to that by nifedipine (+1.44 +/- 0.47 ng/ml/hr, p less than 0.05), plasma norepinephrine concentration increased less (p less than 0.01) after captopril (+100 +/- 23 ng/ml, p less than 0.05) than after nifedipine (+283 +/- 51 ng/ml, p less than 0.05). Thus, the diminished adrenergic activity is a likely candidate for the abolished reflex tachycardia after the inhibition of angiotensin I converting enzyme activity by captopril in essential hypertension.     

Synergisms of cardiovascular effects between iptakalim and amlodipine,hydrochlorothiazide or propranolol in anesthetized rats

The primary object of this fundamental research was to survey the synergistic cardiovascular effects of iptakalim, a novel ATP–sensitive potassium channel(KATP) opener, and clinical first-line antihypertensive drugs, such as calcium antagonists, thiazide diuretics and β receptor blockers by a 2×2 factorial-design experiment. It would provide a theoretical basis for the development of new combined antihypertensive therapy program after iptakalim is applied to the clinic. Amlodipine besylate, hydrochlorothiazide and propranolol were chosen as clinical first-line antihypertensive drugs. Blood pressure, heart rate(HR) and cardiac functions were observed in anesthetized normal rats by an eightchannel physiological recorder. The results showed that iptakalim monotherapy in a low dose could produce significant antihypertensive effect. There was no interaction between iptakalim and amlodipine on the maximal changes of systolic blood pressure(SBP), diastolic blood pressure(DBP), mean arterial blood pressure(MABP), the left ventricular systolic pressure(LVSP), and the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure(LVEDP)(P0.05). However, the effects of combination iptakalim/amlodipine on the maximal changes of SBP, DBP, MABP, LVSP and LVEDP were more obvious than those of iptakalim or amlodipine monotherapy. And there was strong positive interaction between iptakalim and amlodipine on the maximal changes of HR(P0.05). According to the maximal changes of DBP, MABP, LVSP and LVEDP(P0.05) of combination iptakalim with hydrochlorothiazide, there was strong positive interaction between them. But there was no interaction between iptakalim and hydrochlorothiazide on the maximal drop of SBP and HR(P0.05). According to the maximal drops of DBP, MABP of combination iptakalim with propranolol, there was strong positive interaction between them(P0.05). But there was no interaction between iptakalim and propranolol on the maximal changes of SBP, LVSP,LVEDP and HR(P0.05). In conclusion, it was the first time to study the effects of amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide or propranolol, which had different mechanisms of action from iptakalim, on cardiovascular effects of iptakalim in anesthetized normal rats. This study proved that the combination of iptakalim with hydrochlorothiazide or propranolol respectively had significant synergism on lowering blood pressure, while the combination of iptakalim/amlodipine had additive action on lowering blood pressure. Meanwhile the antihypertensive effect was explicit, stable and long-lasting. Iptakalim thus appears suitable for the clinical treatment of hypertensive people who need two or more kinds of antihypertensive agents.     

Effects of propranolol, clonidine and hydrochlorothiazide treatment and abrupt discontinuation on central and peripheral noradrenergic activity in essential hypertension

This study was undertaken to investigate further the CNS actions of commonly employed antihypertensive drugs. Measurements of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma catecholamines (CA) were made in an attempt to estimate the activity of central and peripheral noradrenergic neurons during treatment with or after abrupt discontinuation of treatment with clonidine (CLO), propranolol (PRO), hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or placebo, in patients with essential hypertension. A randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled, single-blind design was employed. BP reductions equal to or greater than 10 mmHg were observed with CLO (0.36 +/- 0.07 mg daily), PRO (160 mg +/- 0 mg daily) or HCTZ (70 +/- 12 mg daily). CLO reduced plasma norepinephrine (NE) by 64% and PRO increased it by 25%. Neither HCTZ nor placebo modified plasma NE. Plasma renin activity (PRA) was reduced by PRO (51%, P less than 0.01) and CLO (35%, P less than 0.05). CSF-NE levels (pg/ml) were significantly lower in the CLO group (CLO: 175 +/- 23; PRO: 278 +/- 35; HCTZ: 255 +/- 34; placebo: 203 +/- 7).     

Methyldopa and propranolol or practolol in moderate hypertension.

The effect of a low dose of methyldopa combined with (a) a non-selective and (b) a selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist was studied in a double-blind crossover trial in 24 carefully selected patients with moderate hypertension (mean initial lying blood pressure 189/117 mm Hg). Each patient received methyldopa 750 mg/day, propranolol 240 mg/day, practolol 600 mg/day, methyldopa 750 mg/day combined with propranolol 240 mg/day, methyldopa 750 mg/day combined with practolol 600 mg/day, and placebo for four weeks each according to a random sequence. After four weeks of therapy the most effective treatment, methyldopa combined with propranolol, reduced lying and standing blood pressures by 36-5/21-4 mm Hg and 44-7/25 mm Hg respectively. Thic combination had similar effects to those of the combination of methyldopa with the cardioselective agent practolol except that it reduced lying diastolic pressure further. The combination was more effective than either treatment alone. No significant differences were found between the effects of propranolol, practolol, or methyldopa at the doses used.     

Metabolic consequences of atenolol and propranolol in treatment of essential hypertension.

A six-month study of triglyceride, cholesterol, free fatty acid (FFA), glucose, insulin, growth hormone, and glucagon concentrations was carried out in asymptomatic hypertensive normal-weight men randomly allocated to treatment with atenolol or propranolol. A highly significant increase in the basal plasma triglyceride concentration was observed in propranolol-treated patients after three and six months'' treatment, with a smaller but significant increase in atenolol-treated subjects after six months'' treatment. The changes in triglyceride concentration could not be ascribed to variations in plasma insulin, growth hormone, or glucagon concentrations. Basal FFA concentrations were reduced during the first three months of treatment in both groups but returned to pretreatment levels after six months. Plasma cholesterol concentrations were unchanged by either agent.     

Hydrochlorothiazide-amiloride versus hydrochlorothiazide alone for essential hypertension: effects on blood pressure and serum potassium level

In a double-blind randomized controlled trial the effects on the blood pressure and the serum potassium concentration of hydrochlorothiazide-amiloride hydrochloride (Moduret) and hydrochlorothiazide alone were compared in 266 adults who were normokalemic and had a diastolic blood pressure greater than 95 mm Hg at the time of entry into the study. The mean ages (52.2 and 53.8 years) and the proportions of men (66% and 56%) in the groups given the combination drug and hydrochlorothiazide alone respectively were similar. In the group given the combination drug the mean blood pressure, measured while the patients were supine, and the mean serum potassium level fell significantly, from 156/99 to 138/88 mm Hg and from 4.23 to 3.91 mmol/L, after 8 weeks of treatment. In the other group both measures also fell significantly, the blood pressure from 157/99 to 138/87 mm Hg and the potassium level from 4.16 to 3.69 mmol/L. The proportions of patients in the two groups with hypokalemia (14% and 29% respectively), defined as a serum potassium level below 3.5 mmol/L, differed significantly (p = 0.0026), whereas the proportions with a potassium level exceeding 4.5 mmol/L (4.5% and 3.9% respectively) were similar. Thus, the combination drug reduced the blood pressure to the same extent as hydrochlorothiazide alone but significantly less often caused hypokalemia. In light of growing concerns about the cardiovascular complications of hypokalemia, hydrochlorothiazide-amiloride appears preferable to hydrochlorothiazide alone for the treatment of some patients with hypertension.     

Renin concentrations and effects of propranolol and spironolactone in patients with hypertension.

In a crossover study 32 patients with hypertension were randomly allocated to treatment with spironolactone 200 mg/day for two months, propranolol 320 mg/day for two months, and a combination of both drugs at half the dose. Between the treatments placebo was given for two months. Both spironolactone and propranolol lowered the blood pressure significantly in both positions. The initial plasma renin activity (PRA) levels ranged from 0-4 to 5-0 mug angiotensin I l-1 h-1, and there was a close correlation between these levels and the effects of the drugs: with increasing PRA the response to propranolol was better while the opposite was true for spironolactone. Spironolactone reduced the blood pressure more at eight than at four weeks, while no such difference could be shown for propranolol. Spironolactone and propranolol together decreased the blood pressure still further irrespective of the initial PRA. All patients achieved a normal supine blood pressure.     

Sustained effects of biofeedback-assisted relaxation therapy in essential hypertension.

The usefulness of biofeedback-assisted relaxation as an adjunct or substitute for pharmacotherapy in essential hypertension can be enhanced if the effects are shown to persist after formal treatment has ended. Patients with essential hypertension successfully treated with biofeedback-assisted relaxation were recalled for follow-up yearly after the termination of treatment. Twenty-six of 40 patients met the BP criterion for success. At one-, two-, and three-year follow-up, 31%, 38%, and 27% of the successful completers continued to meet the criterion for success. The pretreatment-posttreatment decreases in BP were accompanied by decreases in forehead muscle tension and urinary cortisol. Forehead muscle tension, urinary cortisol, and anxiety levels were significantly lower than pretreatment one year after the end of treatment. Self-report data were used to assess continued relaxation practice. No relationship was found between practice and any other dependent measure. It appears that some patients trained in biofeedback-assisted relaxation can maintain lowered blood pressure, muscle tension, anxiety, and cortisol levels over the long term; however, the role of relaxation practice in maintaining these lowered levels remains unclear.     

Immediate plasma renin response to propranolol: differentiation between essential and renal hypertension.

The immediate short-term effect on plasma renin activity of intravenous injection of propranolol was studied in 31 normal subjects and 166 hypertensive patients. In patients with essential hypertension and normal subjects plasma renin activity fell considerably within 15 minutes; the fall was directly proportional to initial plasma renin levels. In contrast, in patients with renal hypertension the fall was much less pronounced or totally absent. These differences in response to propranolol provide, though presently only on a group basis, a biochemical means of differentiating between patients with renal hypertension and those with essential hypertension. The observations also indicate that, unlike normal subjects and patients with essential hypertension, in patients with renal hypertension sympathetic activity plays no part in the control of basal plasma renin levels.     

Long-term therapy of essential tremor with propranolol.

In a double-blind crossover study 12 patients with essential tremor were treated with propranolol and a placebo; 8 improved with propranolol and 3 with the placebo; the degree of improvement with propranolol was greater. In a similar study with diazepam 5 of 12 improved with diazepam and 4 of 12 with the placebo; the degree of improvement was less than that achieved with propranolol. Response in 21 patients to treatment with propranolol for 2 to 4 years was excellent in 4, good in 4 and fair in 10; the condition of 1 was unchanged and that of 2, worse. Excellent response was maintained for as long as 4 years, but response tended to deteriorate with time if initially it was less than excellent. Response decreased with increasing age. No patient 60 years of age or older had an excellent response, and the four with an excellent response were under age 55, three being under age 35; all four had had their tremor less than 12 years. Patients with essential tremor should be given a 3-month trial of propranolol at 120 mg/d; if no significant response is seen the dose should be decreased, then the drug discontinued.     

Effect of propranolol on cyclic AMP excretion and plasma renin activity in labile essential hypertension

Labile hypertension is often associated with elevated cardiac output, increased plasma renin activity (PRA) and urinary cyclic AMP excretion in response to upright posture and to isoproterenol. The β-blocking agent propranolol was demonstrated to be an effective therapeutic agent in this condition. The effect of posture on cyclic AMP, PRA, pulse rate and blood pressure was therefore studied during the administration of propranolol and a placebo in patients with labile hypertension. With the patient on placebo, upright posture induced an increase in pulse rate, cyclic AMP excretion and PRA. Propranolol administration decreased the recumbent and upright blood pressures, pulse rate and PRA. Cyclic AMP excretion remained unchanged in the recumbent position but the postural increase was abolished. No appreciable changes in catecholamine excretion occurred during propranolol administration. Propranolol normalizes some humoral as well as hemodynamic abnormalities of labile hypertension and therefore may be of benefit in long-term treatment and possibly also in the prevention of stable hypertension.     

Sustained effects of biofeedback-assisted relaxation therapy in essential hypertension

The usefulness of biofeedback-assisted relaxation as an adjunct or substitute for pharmacotherapy in essential hypertension can be enhanced if the effects are shown to persist after formal treatment has ended. Patients with essential hypertension successfully treated with biofeedback-assisted relaxation were recalled for follow-up yearly after the termination of treatment. Twenty-six of 40 patients met the BP criterion for success. At one-, two-, and three-year follow-up, 31%, 38%, and 27% of the successful completers continued to meet the criterion for success. The pretreatment-posttreatment decreases in BP were accompanied by decreases in forehead muscle tension and urinary cortisol. Forehead muscle tension, urinary cortisol, and anxiety levels were significantly lower than pretreatment one year after the end of treatment. Self-report data were used to assess continued relaxation practice. No relationship was found between practice and any other dependent measure. It appears that some patients trained in biofeedback-assisted relaxation can maintain lowered blood pressure, muscle tension, anxiety, and cortisol levels over the long term; however, the role of relaxation practice in maintaining these lowered levels remains unclear.     

Effects of hydrochlorothiazide and propranolol treatment on chylomicron metabolism in hypertensive objects

Modifications in chylomicron metabolism caused by antihypertensive drugs were investigated in hypertensive subjects because previous studies had indicated that diuretics and beta-blockers modify the plasma lipid concentrations through mechanisms that were not fully understood. A triglyceride-rich emulsion resembling lymph chylomicrons, labeled with (3H) triolein and (14C) cholesteryl oleate, was infused intravenously into mildly hypertensive patients after 8 weeks on placebo and subsequently on hydrochlorothiazide (n = 10) or propranolol (n = 8). The residence time of both radioactivities in plasma was utilized for the simultaneous calculation of the particle remnant removal rate and of the lipoprotein lipase activity expressed as a delipidation index = 1 - [(3H) triolein residence time/(14C) cholesteryl oleate residence time]. Treatment with hydrochlorothiazide diminished the delipidation rate value whereas propranolol mildly increased the removal rate of the remnant particle. These alterations of the chylomicron kinetics were not accompanied by changes in plasma triglycerides, glucose, and insulin concentration as measured in the fasting state. The impairment of the lipoprotein lipase activity by thiazides and the faster removal rate of the whole particle by propranolol could explain the reason why in previous clinical studies the simultaneous use of these drugs does not aggravate the hyperlipidemia known to be induced by thiazides alone.     

Angiotensin II in essential hypertension.

Plasma concentrations of angiotensin II (PAC) were measured in a group of 146 hypertensive patients (diastolic pressure greater than 105 mm Hg) who had no apparent underlying cause for their condition and 113 randomly selected normotensive controls (diastolic pressure less than 90 mm Hg). There was no evidence of bimodality in the frequency distribution curves for plasma angiotensin II concentrations among the hypertensive patients. It was concluded that hypertension associated with low angiotensin II concentration and by implication "low-renin" hypertension is not a condition separate from essential hypertension.     

Captopril in renovascular hypertension: long-term use in predicting surgical outcome.

The angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitor captopril was used as long-term preoperative treatment in a series of hypertensive patients with unilateral renal arterial disease. There were immediate and sustained falls in plasma angiotensin II and aldosterone concentrations, with converse increases in circulating renin and angiotensin I. In patients with sodium and potassium deficiency and secondary aldosterone excess before treatment captopril corrected the sodium and potassium deficits; in these cases the initial hypotensive response was profound but the later effect was less pronounced. When sodium and potassium state was initially normal it remained unchanged during captopril treatment, while the full hypotensive effect took up to three weeks to be attained. The immediate, but not long-term, falls in arterial pressure with captopril were proportional to the immediate decrements of plasma angiotensin II. Nevertheless, while the immediate blood-pressure reduction with captopril variously overestimated and underestimated the eventual surgical response, the absolute blood-pressure values during long-term captopril related well with those after operation. Pretreatment plasma renin and angiotensin II concentrations, while closely predicting the immediate captopril response, are fallible guides to surgical prognosis. In contrast, long-term treatment with converting-enzyme inhibitors may provide an accurate indication of surgical outcome.     

Effect of nifedipine and propranolol on blood flow,venous compliance and blood pressure in essential hypertension

To determine the efficacy of nifedipine combined with propranolol in the treatment of hypertension, 23 patients with essential hypertension uncontrolled while they were receiving propranolol, 120 mg/d, entered a dose response trial of four 8-week periods while continuing propranolol therapy. Therapy during the four periods consisted respectively of a placebo, 30 mg/d of nifedipine, 30 or 60 mg/d of nifedipine, and 30 or 60 mg/d of nifedipine along with only 60 mg/d of propranolol. Studies of forearm blood flow and venous compliance were carried out in nine of the patients. Ten patients dropped out after the first period. The mean blood pressures while the patients were recumbent after the first, second and third periods were 163 ± 17/100 ± 6, 147 ± 13/89 ± 10 and 141 ± 19/84 ± 10 mm Hg respectively. There was no evidence of tolerance in the four patients who received 30 mg/d of nifedipine during the third period. There was a significant dose-diastolic pressure response (p < 0.0006) without a change in heart rate in the eight who received 60 mg/d of nifedipine during this period. After 16 weeks of therapy with nifedipine 11 patients had a diastolic pressure less than 90 mm Hg while recumbent. While mean blood pressure and heart rate for the group were not significantly increased at the end of the fourth period, in three of the patients the diastolic pressure while recumbent increased to over 90 mm Hg. This suggests that 120 mg/d of propranolol is the minimum dose required for concomitant therapy. Adverse symptoms were mild and transient. Forearm plethysmography showed that nifedipine induced arteriolar but not venous dilation and that propranolol attenuated the vasodilator effect of nifedipine. The author concludes that nifedipine was safe and effective in combination with propranolol in this group of patients with essential hypertension.     

Chronotherapy with valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination in essential hypertension: improved sleep-time blood pressure control with bedtime dosing

Administration of angiotensin receptor blockers at bedtime results in greater reduction of nighttime blood pressure than dosing upon awakening, independent of the terminal half-life of each individual medication. To obtain blood pressure (BP) target goals most patients require treatment with more than one hypertension medication. However, the potential differing effects on BP regulation of combination therapy depending on the time-of-day of administration have scarcely been investigated. Accordingly, the authors prospectively evaluated the administration-time-dependent BP-lowering efficacy of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination therapy. The authors conducted a randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial on 204 subjects with essential hypertension (95 men/109 women), 49.7?±?11.1 (mean?±?SD) yrs of age. The BP of participants in this trial was not properly controlled with respect to published ambulatory BP criteria after initially randomized to valsartan monotherapy (160?mg/day), whether routinely ingested upon awakening by one group or at bedtime by another group for 12 wks. Thus, HCTZ (12.5?mg/day) was added to valsartan as a single-pill formulation, maintaining the original treatment-time, i.e., upon awakening or at bedtime, of participants of the two groups, for another 12 wks. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring for 48?h at inclusion and after each 12-wk span of therapy. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately define the beginning and end of daytime activity and nocturnal sleep so that the respective BP means for every participant at each evaluation could be precisely determined. Combination therapy resulted in a similar statistically significant reduction of the 48-h BP mean from baseline for both treatment-time groups (17.0/11.5?mm Hg in systolic/diastolic BP after combination therapy on awakening; 17.9/12.1?mm Hg reduction after combination treatment at bedtime; p?>?.542 between groups). The awake BP mean was reduced to a comparable extent in both treatment-time groups (p?>?.682). However, bedtime compared to morning dosing better reduced the asleep means of systolic BP (20.1 vs. 16.0?mm Hg; p?=?.015) and pulse pressure (6.5 vs. 4.0?mm Hg; p?=?.007 between groups). Accordingly, the proportion of subjects with a baseline non-dipper BP profile was significantly reduced from 59% to 23% only after bedtime combination treatment (p?相似文献