Is routine episiotomy necessary?

One hundred and eighty one primigravid women delivering vaginally in July and August 1982 in the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Patients in one group were to undergo episiotomy. Those in the other group were not to undergo episiotomy unless it was considered to be essential. The outcome was compared with that of the clinical practice over the previous six months at the hospital. Of the 92 patients allocated not to undergo episiotomy, seven (8%) had one done for medical reasons compared with 507 (89%) in the previous six months. First degree tears occurred in 23 (25%) and second degree tears in 43 (47%). Nineteen (21%), however, retained an intact perineum compared with only 35 (6%) of the women who had delivered in the preceding six months. Assessments of perineal pain, bruising, swelling, and healing and records of ingestion of analgesics were made for the first four days after delivery, and again at a check up six weeks after delivery, in patients who had had spontaneous vertex deliveries. Forty patients who underwent episiotomy and 37 who sustained a second degree tear formed two comparable groups. There was no difference in outcome between them. Data were also evaluated for 19 women who retained an intact perineum, 22 who sustained a first degree tear, and 11 who underwent episiotomy and epidural anaesthesia; all 52 of these women had spontaneous vertex deliveries. Despite severe soft tissue injury in two patients those who fared best were those who retained an intact perineum. First degree tears were associated with symptoms similar to those associated with second degree tears. Those who fared worst were women who underwent episiotomy after epidural anaesthesia. The value of routine episiotomy in primigravid patients is questioned, but the final decision can be made only by the accoucheur at the time of imminent delivery.     

West Berkshire perineal management trial.

One thousand women were allocated at random to one of two perineal management policies, both intended to minimise trauma during spontaneous vaginal delivery. In one the aim was to restrict episiotomy to fetal indications; in the other the operation was to be used more liberally to prevent perineal tears. The resultant episiotomy rates were 10% and 51% respectively. An intact perineum was more common among those allocated to the restrictive policy. This group experienced more perineal and labial tears, however, and included four of the five cases of severe trauma. There were no significant differences between the two groups either in neonatal state or in maternal pain and urinary symptoms 10 days and three months post partum. Women allocated to the restrictive policy were more likely to have resumed sexual intercourse within a month after delivery. These findings provide little support either for liberal use of episiotomy or for claims that reduced use of the operation decreases postpartum morbidity.     

Physicians' beliefs and behaviour during a randomized controlled trial of episiotomy: consequences for women in their care.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether physicians'' beliefs concerning episiotomy are related to their use of procedures and to differential outcomes in childbirth. DESIGN: Post-hoc cohort analysis of physicians and patients involved in a randomized controlled trial of episiotomy. SETTING: Two tertiary care hospitals and one community hospital in Montreal. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 703 women at low risk of medical or obstetric problems enrolled in the trial we studied 447 women (226 primiparous and 221 multiparous) attended by 43 physicians. Subjects attended by residents or nurses were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients: intact perineum v. perineal trauma, length of labour, procedures used (instrumental delivery, oxytocin augmentation of labour, cesarean section and episiotomy), position for birth, rate of and reasons for not assigning women to a study arm, postpartum perineal pain and satisfaction with the birth experience, physicians: beliefs concerning episiotomy. RESULTS: Women attended by physicians who viewed episiotomy very unfavorably were more likely than women attended by the other physicians to have an intact perineum (23% v. 11% to 13%, p < 0.05) and to experience less perineal trauma. The first stage of labour was 2.3 to 3.5 hours shorter for women attended by physicians who viewed episiotomy favourably than for women attended by physicians who viewed episiotomy very unfavorably (p < 0.05 to < 0.01), and the former physicians were more likely to use oxytocin augmentation of labour. Physicians who viewed episiotomy more favourably failed more often than those who viewed the procedure very unfavourably to assign patients to a study arm late in labour (odds ratio [OR] 1.88, p < 0.05), both overall and because they felt that "fetal distress" or cesarean section necessitated exclusion of the subject. They used the lithotomy position for birth more often (OR 3.94 to 4.55, p < 0.001), had difficulty limiting episiotomy in the restricted-use arm of the trial and diagnosed fetal distress and perineal inadequacy more often than the comparison groups. The patients of physicians who viewed episiotomy very favourably experienced more perineal pain (p < 0.01), and of those who viewed episiotomy favourably and very favourably experienced less satisfaction with the birth experience (p < 0.01) than the patients of physicians who viewed the procedure very unfavourably. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians with favourably views of episiotomy were more likely to use techniques to expedite labour, and their patients were more likely to have perineal trauma and to be less satisfied with the birth experience. This evidence that physician beliefs can influence patient outcomes has both clinical and research implications.     

Association between median episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in primiparous women

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between median episiotomy and severe (third- and fourth-degree) perineal lacerations in primiparous women. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital providing secondary obstetric care in Quebec City. PATIENTS: A total of 6522 primiparous women who gave birth vaginally to a single live baby in cephalic position between 1985 and 1993. OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations. RESULTS: Median episiotomy was performed in 4390 women (67.3%). A total of 1002 women (15.4%) had a third- or fourth-degree laceration. The frequency of severe perineal lacerations was 20.6% with episiotomy and 4.5% without episiotomy (relative risk [RR] 4.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.74-5.62). This association persisted after adjustment by stratified analysis for type of delivery and birth weight (RR 3.03, 95% CI 2.52-3.63) and by logistic regression for type of delivery, birth weight, epidural analgesia, shoulder dystocia, baby''s head circumference, experience of the physician and year of delivery (odds ratio 3.58, 95% CI 2.84-4.50). CONCLUSION: Median episiotomy is strongly associated with third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in primiparous women. Reducing the use of this procedure could decrease the occurrence of severe perineal tears.     

West Berkshire perineal management trial: three year follow up.

Women who had participated in a randomised controlled trial of policies of restricted (10%) versus liberal (51%) episiotomy during spontaneous vaginal delivery were recontacted by postal questionnaire three years after delivery. Altogether 674 out of 1000 responded, and there was no evidence of a differential response rate between the two trial groups. Similar numbers of women in the two groups reported further deliveries, almost all of which had been vaginal and spontaneous. Fewer women allocated to restrictive use of episiotomy required perineal suturing after subsequent delivery, but this difference was not significant. Pain during sexual intercourse and incontinence of urine were equally reported in the two groups. The similarity in incontinence rates persisted when severity, type of incontinence, and subsequent deliveries were taken into account. Liberal use of episiotomy does not seem to prevent urinary incontinence or increase long term dyspareunia.     

Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: retrospective cohort study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the relation between midline episiotomy and postpartum anal incontinence.DesignRetrospective cohort study with three study arms and six months of follow up.SettingUniversity teaching hospital.ParticipantsPrimiparous women who vaginally delivered a live full term, singleton baby between 1 August 1996 and 8 February 1997: 209 who received an episiotomy; 206 who did not receive an episiotomy but experienced a second, third, or fourth degree spontaneous perineal laceration; and 211 who experienced either no laceration or a first degree perineal laceration.ResultsWomen who had episiotomies had a higher risk of faecal incontinence at three (odds ratio 5.5, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 16.2) and six (3.7, 0.9 to 15.6) months postpartum compared with women with an intact perineum. Compared with women with a spontaneous laceration, episiotomy tripled the risk of faecal incontinence at three months (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 7.9) and six months (0.7 to 11.2) postpartum, and doubled the risk of flatus incontinence at three months (1.3 to 3.4) and six months (1.2 to 3.7) postpartum. A non-extending episiotomy (that is, second degree surgical incision) tripled the risk of faecal incontinence (1.1 to 9.0) and nearly doubled the risk of flatus incontinence (1.0 to 3.0) at three months postpartum compared with women who had a second degree spontaneous tear. The effect of episiotomy was independent of maternal age, infant birth weight, duration of second stage of labour, use of obstetric instrumentation during delivery, and complications of labour. ConclusionsMidline episiotomy is not effective in protecting the perineum and sphincters during childbirth and may impair anal continence.     

Methods and consequences of changes in use of episiotomy.

OBJECTIVES--To evaluate the use of feedback by graphical profiles of rates of episiotomy and the impact on clinical practice and perineal state after spontaneous vaginal deliveries assisted by midwives with different attitudes towards episiotomy. DESIGN--Observation period in labour ward followed by feedback to midwives about their own and other midwives'' use of episiotomies. The periods before and after the intervention were compared. SUBJECTS--All women (n = 3919) delivering during the two periods who had been assisted by one of 30 midwives; each midwife supervised at least 20 deliveries during each period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Overall rates of episiotomies and indications, incidence of intact perineums, perineal lacerations, and tears of anal sphincter. RESULTS--The overall rate of episiotomy during the observation period was 37.1% (615). During the second period the rate was 6.6% lower (95% confidence interval 3.6% to 9.6%), corresponding to a relative decrease of 17.8% (10.1% to 24.7%). Higher rates of episiotomy during the observation period were associated with larger reductions in the second period. The decrease could be explained by less use of episiotomy in deliveries with rigid perineum or impending perineal tear. Compared with the observation period, in the second period 3.2% more women (0.3% to 6.3%) had an intact perineum after delivery and 3.4% (0.4% to 6.2%) experienced perineal tears. The overall incidence of tears of the anal sphincter remained unchanged. Women had a slightly reduced incidence of tears of the anal sphincter, however, if they were delivered by midwives who reduced a medium or high initial rate of episiotomy and a tendency towards an increased incidence of tears if they were assisted by midwives who reduced low initial rates (around 20%) of episiotomy. CONCLUSIONS--Changes in the use of episiotomy induced by awareness of clinical practice among midwives seem to increase the incidence of parturients with intact perineum without a concomitant rise in tears of the anal sphincter. To avoid the increase of such tears these changes should probably be restricted to midwives with rates of episiotomies above 30%.     

Five year prospective survey of risk of booking for a home birth in Essex.

A prospective survey was undertaken in 26 practices in Essex to assess the risks associated with a home birth. The 202 women who were booked for a home confinement were compared with a similar group of 185 women who were booked for hospital delivery under consultant care. The principal difference in outcome was the induction rate of 19% in the hospital group compared with 8% in the group booked for delivery at home. A higher rate of episiotomy and second degree tears and more Apgar scores of 7 or below were found in those who were booked for hospital. There were no perinatal deaths in either group. The results of this study showed no evidence of an increased risk associated with home confinements but indicated that there were fewer problems than were encountered in the deliveries in mothers confined in hospital.     

Reducing the frequency of episiotomies through a continuous quality improvement program.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) program in reducing episiotomy rates. DESIGN: Before-and-after study; CQI methods were used to examine the process of care during labour and birth. INTERVENTIONS: Identification of care factors that would increase the probability of episiotomy. Implementation of initiatives that would change the process of care to minimize the probability of episiotomy. Educational strategies included promotion of better understanding of what constitutes an appropriate episiotomy rate and ways to reduce maternal exhaustion and true fetal distress as well as manoeuvres to protect the perineum during birth. SETTING: Low-risk family practice obstetrics service in a tertiary care hospital in southwestern Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: All 102 family physicians at the study hospital who provided intrapartum care in the year before and the year during which the CQI program was implemented and the women for whom the care was provided (approximately 1,400 per year). OUTCOME MEASURES: Episiotomy rates (overall, among primiparous and multiparous women, and among individual family physicians) and rates of perineal tear, perineal infection and postpartum readmission. RESULTS: Although the planned reduction in the episiotomy rate was not achieved during the study period, the overall rate decreased significantly from 44.5% to 33.3% (p < 0.001). Among the primiparous women the rate decreased from 57.6% to 46.2% (p < 0.001) and among the multiparous women from 34.3% to 23.6% (p < 0.001). The reduced episiotomy rate among the primiparous women was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears and a significant increase in the number of women giving birth with an intact perineum or a minor (first-degree) tear. These benefits were not seen among the multiparous women, whose decreased episiotomy rate was associated with a significant increase in the number of women experiencing a second-degree perineal tear. During the intervention period, there was no increase in the rates of vaginal trauma or postpartum bleeding, infection or readmission because of complications related to perineal trauma. The episiotomy rates for most physicians decreased significantly during the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: The CQI model may be useful in modifying clinical practices such as episiotomy because it focuses on understanding the process of care and the environment in which care is provided, both of which may have a major impact on physician behaviour. Further study is needed to ascertain the sustainability of the effects of this approach and which components of the model had the greatest effect.     

Differences in intrapartum obstetric care provided to women at low risk by family physicians and obstetricians.

To determine differences in practice style and to examine maternal and neonatal outcomes, we reviewed the hospital charts of 1115 women admitted by family physicians and 1250 women admitted by obstetricians who gave birth at one of three teaching hospitals in Toronto between April 1985 and March 1986. All the women in the two groups were categorized retrospectively as being at low risk at the onset of labour on the basis of their prenatal records and their admission histories and physical examination results. There were higher proportions of younger women and women of lower socioeconomic status in the family physician group than in the obstetrician group (p less than 0.001). The rates of interventions, including artificial rupture of the membranes, induction, augmentation, low forceps plus vacuum extraction, episiotomy and epidural anesthesia, were all higher in the obstetrician group. The mean birth weight and the cesarean section rate were the same in the two groups. Differences in labour and delivery outcomes between the two groups, including a higher rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery for the family physicians, reflected a more "expectant" practice style by family doctors. However, there were no significant differences in the rates of maternal or neonatal complications. A practice style characterized by a higher rate of interventions was not associated with improved maternal or newborn outcome in this low-risk setting.     

Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair.

OBJECTIVES--To determine (i) risk factors in the development of third degree obstetric tears and (ii) the success of primary sphincter repair. DESIGN--(i) Retrospective analysis of obstetric variables in 50 women who had sustained a third degree tear, compared with the remaining 8553 vaginal deliveries during the same period. (ii) Women who had sustained a third degree tear and had primary sphincter repair and control subjects were interviewed and investigated with anal endosonography, anal manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurements. SETTING--Antenatal clinic in teaching hospital in inner London. SUBJECTS--(i) All women (n = 8603) who delivered vaginally over a 31 month period. (ii) 34 women who sustained a third degree tear and 88 matched controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Obstetric risk factors, defecatory symptoms, sonographic sphincter defects, and pudendal nerve damage. RESULTS--(i) Factors significantly associated with development of a third degree tear were: forceps delivery (50% v 7% in controls; P = 0.00001), primiparous delivery (85% v 43%; P = 0.00001), birth weight > 4 kg (P = 0.00002), and occipito-posterior position at delivery (P = 0.003). No third degree tear occurred during 351 vacuum extractions. Eleven of 25 (44%) women who were delivered without instruments and had a third degree tear did so despite a posterolateral episiotomy. (ii) Anal incontinence or faecal urgency was present in 16 women with tears and 11 controls (47% v 13%; P = 0.00001). Sonographic sphincter defects were identified in 29 with tears and 29 controls (85% v 33%; P = 0.00001). Every symptomatic patient had persistent combined internal and external sphincter defects, and these were associated with significantly lower anal pressures. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurements were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS--Vacuum extraction is associated with fewer third degree tears than forceps delivery. An episiotomy does not always prevent a third degree tear. Primary repair is inadequate in most women who sustain third degree tears, most having residual sphincter defects and about half experiencing anal incontinence, which is caused by persistent mechanical sphincter disruption rather than pudendal nerve damage. Attention should be directed towards preventive obstetric practice and surgical techniques of repair.     

Home versus hospital deliveries: follow up study of matched pairs for procedures and outcome. Zurich Study Team.

OBJECTIVE: To assess procedures and outcomes in deliveries planned at home versus those planned in hospital among women choosing the place of delivery. DESIGN: Follow up study of matched pairs. SETTING: Antenatal clinics and reference hospitals in Zurich between 1989 and 1992. SUBJECTS: 489 women opting for home delivery and 385 opting for hospital delivery; the women comprised all those attending members of the study team for antenatal care and those attending the reference hospital for antenatal care who could be matched with the women planning home confinement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Need for medication and incidence of interventions during delivery (caesarean section, forceps, vacuum extraction, episiotomy), duration of labour, occurrence of severe perineal lesions, maternal blood loss, and perinatal morbidity and death. RESULTS: All women were followed up from their first antenatal visit till three months after delivery. Referrals during pregnancy (n = 37) and labour (70), changes of mind (15 home to hospital, eight hospital to home), and 17 miscarriages resulted in 369 births occurring at home and 486 in hospital. During delivery the home birth group needed significantly less medication and fewer interventions whereas no differences were found in durations of labour, occurrence of severe perineal lesions, and maternal blood loss. Perinatal death was recorded in one planned hospital delivery and one planned home delivery (overall perinatal mortality 2.3/1000). There was no difference between home and hospital delivered babies in birth weight, gestational age, or clinical condition. Apgar scores were slightly higher and umbilical cord pH lower in home births, but these differences may have been due to differences in clamping and the time of transportation. CONCLUSION: Healthy low risk women who wish to deliver at home have no increased risk either to themselves or to their babies.     

Care in a birth room versus a conventional setting: a controlled trial.

A controlled clinical trial was carried out to assess whether a birth room setting would influence the care of mothers and newborns. Of the 163 low-risk women enrolled, 49 (30%) manifested some prenatal risk and were excluded. The remaining 114 were allocated by strict alternation to a birth room or a conventional setting. Of the 56 women allocated to the birth room, 63% of the primiparas and 19% of the multiparas were later transferred. The numbers in the two settings who had oxytocin stimulation, epidural anesthesia, forceps delivery or cesarean section did not show statistically significant differences. The episiotomy rates were slightly lower in the birth room than in the conventional setting, and the rates of an intact perineum were higher in the birth room. Neither the Apgar scores nor the morbidity rates of the infants showed statistically significant differences related to the setting to which the mother had been allocated, although more infants from the conventional setting were admitted to a special care unit. Both "experimental" groups of women less often received routine perineal shaving, enemas or intravenous infusions than did an obstetrically similar nonexperimental comparison group. Despite the apparent inability in this setting for the birth room to influence the rate of major obstetric procedures (except for episiotomy) and outcomes, the authors believe that a birth room is desirable in tertiary care centres as well as in community hospitals.     

Midwife managed delivery unit: a randomised controlled comparison with consultant led care.

OBJECTIVE--To examine whether intrapartum care and delivery of low risk women in a midwife managed delivery unit differs from that in a consultant led labour ward. DESIGN--Pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio between the midwives unit and the labour ward. SETTING--Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Grampian. SUBJECTS--2844 low risk women, as defined by existing booking criteria for general practitioner units in Grampian. 1900 women were randomised to the midwives unit and 944 to the labour ward. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Maternal and perinatal morbidity. RESULTS--Of the women randomised to the midwives unit, 647 (34%) were transferred to the labour ward antepartum, 303 (16%) were transferred intrapartum, and 80 (4%) were lost to follow up. 870 women (46%) were delivered in the midwives unit. Primigravid women (255/596, 43%) were significantly more likely to be transferred intrapartum than multi-gravid women (48/577, 8%). Significant differences between the midwives unit and labour ward were found in monitoring, fetal distress, analgesia, mobility, and use of episiotomy. There were no significant differences in mode of delivery or fetal outcome. CONCLUSIONS--Midwife managed intrapartum care for low risk women results in more mobility and less intervention with no increase in neonatal morbidity. However, the high rate of transfer shows that antenatal criteria are unable to determine who will remain at low risk throughout pregnancy and labour.     

THIRD DEGREE LACERATION AT DELIVERY—Etiological Considerations,and a Technique for Repair

In a series of 14,080 cases in which either median or mediolateral episiotomy was used to facilitate delivery, third degree extension occurred in 75 cases (0.5 per cent). In related data extension of laceration was observed to occur in an inordinately high proportion of cases in association with use of forceps, greater than normal anterior pelvic depth, delivery of a large baby, primiparity, abnormal position and presentation, use of median incision (although extension also occurred in some cases in which mediolateral episiotomy was done), and hyperflexion and extreme abduction of the thighs.The method of immediate postpartum repair employed was associated with a minimal amount of postpartum discomfort, and late complications were almost nil.     

Third degree laceration at delivery; etiological considerations,and a technique for repair

In a series of 14,080 cases in which either median or mediolateral episiotomy was used to facilitate delivery, third degree extension occurred in 75 cases (0.5 per cent). In related data extension of laceration was observed to occur in an inordinately high proportion of cases in association with use of forceps, greater than normal anterior pelvic depth, delivery of a large baby, primiparity, abnormal position and presentation, use of median incision (although extension also occurred in some cases in which mediolateral episiotomy was done), and hyperflexion and extreme abduction of the thighs. The method of immediate postpartum repair employed was associated with a minimal amount of postpartum discomfort, and late complications were almost nil.     

The Association of Episiotomy with Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury–A Population Based Matched Cohort Study

Objectives

To estimate the independent association of episiotomy with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) using first a cross-sectional and then a matched pair analysis.

Design

A matched cohort.

Setting

Data was gathered from the Finnish Medical Birth Register from 2004–2011.

Population

All singleton vaginal births (n = 303,758).

Methods

Women resulting matched pairs (n = 63,925) were matched based on baseline risk of OASIS defined based on parity (first or second/subsequent vaginal births), age, birth weight, mode of delivery, prior caesarean section, and length of active second stage of birth.

Results

In cross-sectional analysis episiotomy was associated with a 12% lower incidence of OASIS (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 0.98) in first vaginal births and with a 132% increased incidence of OASIS in second or subsequent vaginal births (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.77 to 3.03). In matched pair analysis episiotomy was associated with a 23% (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.86) lower incidence of OASIS in first vaginal births and a 61% (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.29) increased incidence of OASIS in second or subsequent vaginal births compared to women who gave birth without an episiotomy. The matched pair analysis showed a 12.5% and a 31.6% reduction in aORs of OASIS associated with episiotomy, respectively.

Conclusions

A matched pair analysis showed a substantial reduction in the aORs of OASIS with episiotomy, due to confounding by indication. This indicates that results of observational studies evaluating an association between episiotomy and OASIS should be interpreted with caution.     

Effectiveness of pain relief in labour: survey of 1000 mothers

The amount of pain that had been experienced by 1000 women during vaginal delivery of a live child was determined by interview within 48 hours of delivery. Patients had been offered a choice of analgesia, and 536 had received epidural analgesia: pain relief was greatest in this group, just over half having had a painless labour. The duration of pain was also reduced by a third in this group even though patients who had received an epidural block had tended to have longer labour and an incidence of assisted delivery of 51% compared with 6% in the remainder. Seventy-two per cent of the patients receiving an epidural had had as much pain as they had expected. A similar proportion (70%) was reported with simpler analgesic methods, suggesting that women may expect a certain amount of pain in labour and request further analgesic treatment when this is exceeded.     

Changes in the management of labour: 2. Perineal management.

An analysis of 24,439 deliveries between 1980 and 1984 in a large British obstetric unit showed a striking decline in the rate of episiotomy. The rates of first- and second-degree perineal tears increased during the study period, but overall there was a significant rise in the proportion of women who gave birth with an intact perineum (p less than 0.001). There was no increase in the rate of third-degree tears or of other perineal complications. Delivery with an intact perineum was more likely among younger women, those with a short second stage of labour and those with a small baby (p less than 0.001). These findings confirm the short-term safety of lowering episiotomy rates and should be helpful to all obstetric professionals in reducing unnecessary perineal morbidity among childbearing women.     

剖宫产术后镇痛策略的研究进展

剖宫产术后疼痛会对产妇带来一系列不良影响。术后的急性疼痛会使产妇处于高水平的应激状态,增加术后并发症的发生率,不利于产妇的快速康复,并且可能导致慢性疼痛及产后抑郁的发生。良好的术后镇痛一方面可以消除体内的不良刺激,维持内环境的稳定,为机体康复提供有利条件,另一方面可以减轻产妇的心理负担,使其能尽早开始哺乳,并且更好的与新生儿互动。椎管内或静脉注射阿片类药物是目前常用的镇痛方法,但其不良反应较多,并且可以转移至母乳,对新生儿有潜在风险,因此,联合应用其他药物或手段进行多模式镇痛或许是更好的选择。本文对剖宫产术后镇痛药物及镇痛方式的研究进展进行综述,以期为剖宫产术后产妇提供高质量、个体化的镇痛有所帮助。