ERK activation by G-protein-coupled receptors in mouse brain is receptor identity-specific.

In transfected cells and non-neuronal tissues many G-protein-coupled receptors activate p44/42 MAP kinase (ERK), a kinase involved in both hippocampal synaptic plasticity and learning and memory. However, it is not clear to what degree these receptors couple to ERK in brain. G(s)-coupled beta-adrenergic receptor activation of ERK in neurons is critical in the regulation of synaptic plasticity in area CA1 of the hippocampus. In addition, alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors, present in CA1, could potentially activate ERK. We find that, like the beta-adrenergic receptor, the G(q)-coupled alpha(1)AR activates ERK in adult mouse CA1. However, activation of the G(i/o)-coupled alpha(2)AR does not activate ERK, nor does activation of a homologous G(i/o)-coupled receptor enriched in adult mouse CA1, the 5HT(1A) receptor. In contrast, the nonhomologous G(i/o)-coupled gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor does activate ERK in adult mouse CA1. Surprisingly, activation of alpha(2)ARs in CA1 from immature animals where basal phospho-ERK is low induces ERK phosphorylation. These data suggest that although most G-protein-coupled receptor subtypes activate ERK in non-neuronal cells, the coupling of G(i/o) to ERK is tightly regulated in brain.     

AMP-Activated protein kinase is activated by the stimulations of G(q)-coupled receptors

The AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) functions as a metabolic sensor that monitors cellular AMP and ATP levels. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) activates endogeneous AMPKalpha1 in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the PAF receptor coupled with both G(i) and G(q), but its activity was not inhibited after treatment with islet-activating protein. Norepinephrine and bradykinin also activated AMPKalpha1 in cells expressing the G(q)-coupled alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor and bradykinin receptor, respectively. Stimulations of the G(i)-coupled alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor, fMet-Leu-Phe receptor, prostaglandin EP3alpha receptor, and G(s)-coupled beta(2)-adrenergic receptor did not activate AMPKalpha1. AMPKalpha1 thus is activated specifically by stimulation of G(q)-coupled receptors. G(q)-coupled receptors transmit the signal for GLUT4 translocation and glucose uptake through an insulin-independent pathway. However, direct activation of AMPKalpha1 with treatment of 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-d-ribofuranoside did not trigger GLUT4 translocation nor stimulate glucose uptake in our cells. Thus, activation of AMPKalpha1 via G(q) is not sufficient to trigger GLUT4 translocation or stimulate glucose uptake.     

Dominant-negative activity of an alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor signal-inactivating point mutation

alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors (alpha(1)-ARs) are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily and activate inositol phosphate (IP) turnover. We show that glycine and asparagine mutations of Phe303 in transmembrane segment VI (TMVI) of the alpha(1B)-AR, a highly conserved residue in GPCRs, although increasing agonist affinity, abolish agonist-activated IP signalling. Co-expression of the Phe303 mutants also inhibited (-)epinephrine-stimulated IP signalling by wild-type alpha(1B)-AR and other G(q)-coupled receptors, as well as IP signalling mediated by AlF(4)(-) stimulation of both wild-type G(q alpha) and a constitutively active mutant. The inability of the Phe303 mutants to signal is due to induction of a receptor conformation that dissociates G-protein binding from activation. As a result, the Phe303 mutants sequester G(q alpha) and stoichiometrically inhibit Gq signalling in a dominant-negative manner. We further show that both the enhanced basal and agonist-stimulated IP-signalling activity of the constitutively active alpha(1B)-AR mutants, C128F and A293E, are inhibited in the double mutants, C128F/F303G and A293E/F303G. Phe303, therefore, appears to be critically involved in coupling TMVI alpha-helical movement, a key step in receptor activation, to activation of the cognate G-protein.     

Immunoprecipitation of high-affinity, guanine nucleotide-sensitive, solubilized mu-opioid receptors from rat brain: coimmunoprecipitation of the G proteins G(alpha o), G(alpha i1), and G(alpha i3)

Antibodies directed against the C-terminal and the N-terminal regions of the mu-opioid receptor were generated to identify the G proteins that coimmunoprecipitate with the mu receptor. Two fusion proteins were constructed: One contained the 50 C-terminal amino acids of the mu receptor, and the other contained 61 amino acids near the N terminus of the receptor. Antisera directed against both fusion proteins were capable of immunoprecipitating approximately 70% of solubilized rat brain mu receptors as determined by [3H][D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly-ol5]-enkephalin ([3H]DAMGO) saturation binding. The material immunoprecipitated with both of the antisera was recognized as a broad band with a molecular mass between 60 and 75 kDa when screened in a western blot. Guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) had an EC50 of 0.4 nM in diminishing [3H]DAMGO binding to the immunoprecipitated pellet. The ratio of G proteins to mu receptors in the immunoprecipitated material was 1:1. When the material immunoprecipitated with affinity-purified antibody was screened for the presence of G protein a subunits, it was determined that G(alpha)o, G(alpha)i1, G(alpha)i3, and to a lesser extent G(alpha)i2, but not G(alpha)s or G(alpha)q11, were coimmunoprecipitated with the mu receptor. Inclusion of GTPgammaS during the immunoprecipitation process abolished the coimmunoprecipitation of G proteins.     

Molecular basis of partial agonism at the neurotransmitter alpha2A-adrenergic receptor and Gi-protein heterotrimer

To characterize the mechanism by which heterotrimeric G-proteins interpret the signals coming from various neurotransmitters of diverse efficacies (agonists and partial agonists) acting on alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptors, we used a fluorescent resonance energy transfer-based approach to study the effects of these partial agonists on the activation process of both the alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor and its cognate G(i)-protein. We show that ligands of different efficacies switch the receptor into distinct conformational states, which in turn set the speed and extent of the G(i)-protein signaling. Thus, in cells the efficacy by which a receptor responds to diverse ligands is caused by the ability of the G-protein to differentiate between distinct receptor conformations. The data provide a new key characteristic underlying the mechanism of partial agonism at G-protein-coupled receptors.     

Receptor-coupling properties of the invertebrate visual guanine nucleotide binding protein iGqalpha

Invertebrate visual iG(q)alpha is homologous to mammalian mG(q)alpha in two of the three domains important for G protein interaction with receptors; the C-terminus and the linker regions that connect the helical and ras-like domains of the alpha subunit. The third receptor-interacting domain, the N-terminus, contains a six amino acid extension MTLESI in mG(q)alpha that is not present in iG(q)alpha. In co-expression studies we assessed the promiscuity and efficacy of receptor coupling to phospholipase C (PLC) by iG(q)alpha, a non-palmitoylated mutant iG(q)alpha(C3,4A), mG(q)alpha and G(15)alpha. The invertebrate G proteins and mG(q)alpha only coupled to G(q)-coupled receptors (m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mChR1), alpha(1A)-adrenergic receptor (alpha1-AR)) and not to the G(i/s)-coupled receptors (CCR1 receptor, beta2-adrenergic receptor or dopamine D1 receptor) while G(15)alpha coupled to all receptors. iG(q)alpha and iG(q)alpha(C3,4A) both had double the efficacy for PLC activation compared to the mammalian G proteins when co-expressed with mChR1 and alpha1-AR. The increased efficacy of iG(q)alpha compared to mG(q)alpha was also seen downstream of PLC with carbachol stimulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase, ERK1/2. Addition of the MTLESI extension onto the N-terminus of iG(q)alpha decreased its efficacy by 35% whereas deletion of this sequence from mG(q)alpha increased its efficacy by 60% in the PLC and ERK1/2 assays. iG(q)alpha, iG(q)alpha(C3,4A) and mG(q)alpha all displayed similar receptor-independent AlF(4)(-)activation of PLC and guanosine triphosphate hydrolysis (GTPase) activity. iG(q)alpha, and iG(q)alpha(C3,4A) both had increased receptor-activated guanosine 5'-[gamma-[(35)S]thio]triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding when compared to mG(q)alpha when co-expressed with the mChR1. These results demonstrate that G(q) protein efficacy is at least partially determined by the presence of the amino-terminal MTLESI extension. Comparison of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding rates helps explain the increased efficacy of the invertebrate G proteins.     

Post-activation-mediated changes in opioid receptors detected by N-terminal antibodies

The majority of studies examining activity-induced conformational changes in G protein-coupled receptors have focused on transmembrane helices or intracellular regions. Relatively few studies have examined the involvement of the extracellular region in general and the N-terminal region in particular in this process. To begin to address this, we generated a series of antibodies to the N-terminal region of opioid receptors. Characterization of these antibodies revealed that they differentially recognize activated receptors. Recently, we generated monoclonal antibodies that recognize regions proximal to glycosylation sites in the receptor N terminus. Characterization of these antibodies revealed that agonist treatment leads to a decrease in epitope recognition by the antibody presumably because of a movement of the region of the N terminus proximal to glycosylation sites. The time course of the decrease in antibody recognition suggested that it could be due to a post-activation-mediated event. Examination of the involvement of receptor residues in the C-tail and beta-arrestin binding using site-directed mutagenesis and cells or tissues lacking beta-arrestin 2 suggests a role for these desensitization-related mechanisms in governing antibody binding to the receptor. Thus, these N-terminally directed antibodies can differentially recognize post-activation-mediated changes in the C-terminal (intracellular) region of the receptor. Therefore, these conformation-sensitive antibodies represent powerful reagents to probe receptor activation states and provide a potential tool for identifying and characterizing new compounds of therapeutic interest.     

Norepinephrine- and phorbol ester-induced phosphorylation of alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptors. Functional aspects

Maximal adrenergic responses in Rat-1 fibroblasts expressing alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptors are not blocked by activation of protein kinase C. In contrast, activation of protein kinase C induces the phosphorylation of alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptors and blocks their actions. The effect of norepinephrine and phorbol esters on alpha(1a)-adrenoreceptor phosphorylation and coupling to G proteins were studied. Both stimuli lead to dose-dependent receptor phosphorylation. Interestingly, protein kinase C activation affected to a much lesser extent the actions of alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptors than those of the alpha(1b) subtype (norepinephrine elicited increases in calcium in whole cells and [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to membranes). Basal phosphorylation of alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptors was much less than that observed with the alpha(1b) subtype. The carboxyl terminus seems to be the main domain for receptor phosphorylation. Therefore, chimeric receptors, where the carboxyl-terminal tails of alpha(1a) and alpha(1b) adrenergic receptors were exchanged, were constructed and expressed. alpha(1a)-Adrenoreceptors wearing the carboxyl tail of the alpha(1b) subtype had a high basal phosphorylation and displayed a strong phosphorylation in response to norepinephrine and phorbol esters. Our results demonstrate that stimulation of alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor, or activation of protein kinase C, leads to alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation. alpha(1a)-Adrenoreceptors are affected to a much lesser extent than alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptors by protein kinase C activation.     

A single mutation in the 5-HT4 receptor (5-HT4-R D100(3.32)A) generates a Gs-coupled receptor activated exclusively by synthetic ligands (RASSL)

To better understand G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCRs) signaling, cellular and animal physiology, as well as gene therapy, a new tool has recently been proposed. It consists of GPCR mutants that are insensitive to endogenous ligands but sensitive to synthetic ligands. These GPCRs are called receptor activated solely by synthetic ligands (RASSL). Only two examples of such engineered receptors have been described so far: one G(i)-coupled (opioid receptors) and one G(s)-coupled (beta(2)-adrenergic receptors). Here, we describe the first RASSL related to serotonin receptors (D100(3.32)A G(s)-coupled 5-HT(4) receptor or 5-HT(4)-RASSL). 5-HT(4)-RASSL is generated by a single mutation, is totally insensitive to serotonin (5-HT), and still responds to synthetic ligands. These ligands have affinities in the range of nanomolar concentrations for the mutant receptor and exhibit full efficacy. More interestingly, two synthetic ligands behave as antagonists on the wild type but as agonists on the 5-HT(4)-RASSL.     

Activation of Rap1B by G(i) family members in platelets

It has become increasingly appreciated that receptors coupled to G(alpha)(i) family members can stimulate platelet aggregation, but the mechanism for this has remained unclear. One possible mediator is the small GTPase, Rap1, which has been shown to contribute to integrin activation in several cell lines and to be activated by a calcium-dependent mechanism in platelets. Here, we demonstrate that Rap1 is also activated by G(alpha)(i) family members in platelets. First, we show that platelets from mice lacking the G(alpha)(i) family member G(alpha)(z) (which couples to the alpha(2A) adrenergic receptor) are deficient in epinephrine-stimulated Rap1 activation. We also show that platelets from mice lacking G(alpha)(i2), which couples to the ADP receptor, P2Y12, exhibit reduced Rap1 activation in response to ADP. In contrast, platelets from mice that lack G(alpha)(q) show no decrease in the ability to activate Rap1 in response to epinephrine but show a partial reduction in ADP-stimulated Rap1 activation. This result, combined with studies of human platelets treated with ADP receptor-selective inhibitors, indicates that ADP-stimulated Rap1 activation in human platelets is dependent on both the G(alpha)(i)-coupled P2Y12 receptor and the G(alpha)(q)-coupled P2Y1 receptor. G(alpha)(i)-dependent activation of Rap1 in platelets does not appear to be mediated by enhanced intracellular calcium release because no increase in intracellular calcium concentration was detected in response to epinephrine and because the calcium response to ADP was not diminished in platelets from the G(alpha)(i2)-/- mouse. Finally, using human platelets treated with selective inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and mouse platelets selectively lacking the G(beta)(gamma)-activated form of his enzyme (PI3Kgamma), we show that G(i)-mediated Rap1 activation is PI3K-dependent. In summary, activation of Rap1 can be stimulated by G(alpha)(i)- and PI3K-dependent mechanisms in platelets and by G(q)- and Ca(2+)-dependent mechanisms, both of which may play a role in promoting platelet activation.     

Distinct roles for Src tyrosine kinase in beta2-adrenergic receptor signaling to MAPK and in receptor internalization

G protein-coupled receptors form the largest family of membrane receptors and transmit diverse ligand signals to modulate various cellular responses. After activation by their ligands, some of these G protein-coupled receptors are desensitized, internalized (endocytosed), and down-regulated (degraded). In HEK 293 cells, the G(s)-coupled beta2-adrenergic receptor was postulated to initiate a second wave of signaling, such as the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway after the receptor is internalized. The tyrosine kinase c-Src plays a critical role in these events. Here we used mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells deficient in Src family tyrosine kinases to examine the role of Src in beta2-adrenergic receptor signaling to the MAPK pathway and in receptor internalization. We found that in Src-deficient cells the beta2-adrenergic receptor could activate the MAPK pathway. However, the internalization of beta2-adrenergic receptors was blocked in Src-deficient MEF cells. Furthermore, we observed that in MEF cells deficient in beta-arrestin 2 the internalization of the beta2-adrenergic receptor was impaired, whereas the activation of the MAPK pathway by the beta2-adrenergic receptor was normal. Our data demonstrate that although Src and beta-arrestin 2 play essential roles in beta2-adrenergic receptor internalization, they are not required for the activation of the MAPK pathway by the beta2-adrenergic receptor. In other words, our finding suggests that receptor internalization is not required for beta2-adrenergic receptor signaling to the MAPK pathway in MEF cells.     

Inhibition of subsets of G protein-coupled receptors by empty mutants of G protein alpha subunits in g(o), G(11), and G(16)

We previously reported that the xanthine nucleotide binding G(o)alpha mutant, G(o)alphaX, inhibited the activation of G(i)-coupled receptors. We constructed similar mutations in G(11)alpha and G(16)alpha and characterized their nucleotide binding and receptor interaction. First, we found that G(11)alphaX and G(16)alphaX expressed in COS-7 cells bound xanthine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) instead of guanosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate). Second, we found that G(11)alphaX and G(16)alphaX interacted with betagamma subunits in the presence of xanthine diphosphate. These experiments demonstrated that G(11)alphaX and G(16)alphaX were xanthine nucleotide-binding proteins, similar to G(o)alphaX. Third, in COS-7 cells, both G(11)alphaX and G(16)alphaX inhibited the activation of G(q)-coupled receptors, whereas only G(16)alphaX inhibited the activation of G(i)-coupled receptors. Therefore, when in the nucleotide-free state, empty G(11)alphaX and G(16)alphaX appeared to retain the same receptor binding specificity as their wild-type counterparts. Finally, we found that G(o)alphaX, G(11)alphaX, and G(16)alphaX all inhibited the endogenous thrombin receptors and lysophosphatidic acid receptors in NIH3T3 cells, whereas G(11)alphaX and G(16)alphaX, but not G(o)alphaX, inhibited the activation of transfected m1 muscarinic receptor in these cells. We conclude that these empty G protein mutants of G(o)alpha, G(11)alpha, and G(16)alpha can act as dominant negative inhibitors against specific subsets of G protein-coupled receptors.     

Direct optical recording of intrinsic efficacy at a G protein-coupled receptor

Full and partial agonists activate receptors to varying degrees, presumably by inducing full or partial conformational changes in the receptor protein. Varying degrees of partial agonism corresponding to varying intrinsic efficacies have been demonstrated for many compounds acting at G-protein-coupled receptors, but a method to determine intrinsic efficacies directly at the receptor level has so far been lacking. Here we describe a method that allows the direct monitoring of agonist-induced conformational changes in G-protein-coupled receptors. The cyan (CFP) and yellow (YFP) variants of the green fluorescent protein were fused to the receptors. This resulted in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between the CFP- and YFP-moieties. The extent of FRET was reduced in the presence of an agonist. The FRET signal strictly followed agonist occupancy of the receptor. Using the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor as a model system, the full agonist noradrenaline produced a full signal, the partial agonist clonidine produced only a partial signal, and the antagonist phentolamine had no effect. Thus, optical recording of the agonist-induced conformational change in a G-protein-coupled receptor allows the direct analysis of the intrinsic efficacies of agonists.     

Differential regulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and p70 S6 kinase pathways by the alpha(1A)-adrenergic receptor in rat-1 fibroblasts

Phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase and its downstream effector Akt are thought to be signaling intermediates that link cell surface receptors to p70 S6 kinase. We examined the effect of a G(q)-coupled receptor on PI 3-kinase/Akt signaling and p70 S6 kinase activation using Rat-1 fibroblasts stably expressing the human alpha(1A)-adrenergic receptor. Treatment of the cells with phenylephrine, a specific alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor agonist, activated p70 S6 kinase but did not activate PI 3-kinase or any of the three known isoforms of Akt. Furthermore, phenylephrine blocked the insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I)-induced activation of PI 3-kinase and the phosphorylation and activation of Akt-1. The effect of phenylephrine was not confined to signaling pathways that include insulin receptor substrate-1, as the alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor agonist also inhibited the platelet-derived growth factor-induced activation of PI 3-kinase and Akt-1. Although increasing the intracellular Ca(2+) concentration with the ionophore A23187 inhibited the activation of Akt-1 by IGF-I, Ca(2+) does not appear to play a role in the phenylephrine-mediated inhibition of the PI 3-kinase/Akt pathway. The differential ability of phenylephrine and IGF-I to activate Akt-1 resulted in a differential ability to protect cells from UV-induced apoptosis. These results demonstrate that activation of p70 S6 kinase by the alpha(1A)-adrenergic receptor in Rat-1 fibroblasts occurs in the absence of PI 3-kinase/Akt signaling. Furthermore, this receptor negatively regulates the PI 3-kinase/Akt pathway, resulting in enhanced cell death following apoptotic insult.     

Immunoprecipitation of alpha 2a-adrenergic receptor-GTP-binding protein complexes using GTP-binding protein selective antisera. Changes in receptor/GTP-binding protein interaction following agonist binding.

The nature of the interaction of cloned alpha 2a-adrenergic receptors from LLC-PK1-O clone cells with G proteins was investigated using an immunoprecipitation approach. Following solubilization of the alpha 2a receptors, antiserum 8730, which is directed against the C-terminal region of Gi alpha, immunoprecipitated alpha 2a receptor-Gi alpha complexes. The immunoprecipitation was specific since it could be blocked by the peptide to which antiserum 8730 was generated. Antisera 3646 (anti-Gi alpha 1), 1521 (anti-Gi alpha 2), and 1518 (anti-Gi alpha 3) immunoprecipitated solubilized alpha 2a receptor-Gi alpha complexes, indicating that all three Gi alpha subtypes couple with the alpha 2a receptor. Antiserum 9072, which is directed against the C-terminal region of G(o)alpha, immunoprecipitated solubilized alpha 2a receptor-G alpha complexes indicating that these receptors are also coupled to G(o)alpha. Antiserum 8132, which is directed against G beta 36, immunoprecipitated solubilized alpha 2a receptors while the G beta 35 antiserum 8129, did not, indicating that alpha 2a receptors selectively associate with G beta 36. The binding of the partial agonist p-aminoclonidine to the solubilized alpha 2a receptor alters the association of the receptor with G proteins. Following p-aminoclonidine binding to the solubilized alpha 2a receptor, the ability of the C-terminal directed G alpha antisera 8730 and 9072 to coimmunoprecipitate the alpha 2a receptor-G alpha complex was greatly reduced. The effect of p-aminoclonidine was concentration dependent, mimicked by the full agonist UK 14304 and blocked by the alpha 2 receptor antagonist yohimbine. In contrast, antisera directed against internal regions of Gi alpha and G(o)alpha, immunoprecipitated the agonist-bound and agonist-free alpha 2a receptor equally well. These findings indicate that following the binding of agonists to the alpha 2a receptor, Gi alpha and G(o)alpha remain physically associated with the receptor but either the conformation of G alpha linked to the receptor or the conformation of the receptor itself is modified such that the epitope for the C-terminal directed anti-Gi alpha and anti-G(o)alpha antisera are not accessible. These agonist-induced conformational changes in the alpha 2a receptor-G alpha complex may be important for the activation of the G protein and the stimulation of the alpha 2a receptor signal transduction pathway.     

Molecular mechanism of thromboxane A(2)-induced platelet aggregation. Essential role for p2t(ac) and alpha(2a) receptors.

Thromboxane A(2) is a positive feedback lipid mediator produced following platelet activation. The G(q)-coupled thromboxane A(2) receptor subtype, TPalpha, and G(i)-coupled TPbeta subtype have been shown in human platelets. ADP-induced platelet aggregation requires concomitant signaling from two P2 receptor subtypes, P2Y1 and P2T(AC), coupled to G(q) and G(i), respectively. We investigated whether the stable thromboxane A(2) mimetic, (15S)-hydroxy-9, 11-epoxymethanoprosta-5Z,13E-dienoic acid (U46619), also causes platelet aggregation by concomitant signaling through G(q) and G(i), through co-activation of TPalpha and TPbeta receptor subtypes. Here we report that secretion blockade with Ro 31-8220, a protein kinase C inhibitor, completely inhibited U46619-induced, but not ADP- or thrombin-induced, platelet aggregation. Ro 31-8220 had no effect on U46619-induced intracellular calcium mobilization or platelet shape change. Furthermore, U46619-induced intracellular calcium mobilization and shape change were unaffected by A3P5P, a P2Y1 receptor-selective antagonist, and/or cyproheptadine, a 5-hydroxytryptamine subtype 2A receptor antagonist. Either Ro 31-8220 or AR-C66096, a P2T(AC) receptor selective antagonist, abolished U46619-induced inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. In addition, AR-C66096 drastically inhibited U46619-mediated platelet aggregation, which was further inhibited by yohimbine, an alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor antagonist. Furthermore, inhibition of U46619-induced platelet aggregation by Ro 31-8220 was relieved by activation of the G(i) pathway by selective activation of either the P2T(AC) receptor or the alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor. We conclude that whereas thromboxane A(2) causes intracellular calcium mobilization and shape change independently, thromboxane A(2)-induced inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and platelet aggregation depends exclusively upon secretion of other agonists that stimulate G(i)-coupled receptors.     

Monitoring agonist-promoted conformational changes of beta-arrestin in living cells by intramolecular BRET

Recruitment of beta-arrestin (beta-arr) to agonist-stimulated G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has a crucial role in controlling signalling efficacy and selectivity. When translocated to the receptor, beta-arr is believed to undergo important conformational rearrangement necessary for its downstream actions. To probe these changes in living cells, we constructed an intramolecular bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based biosensor, in which beta-arr is sandwiched between the Renilla luciferase (Luc) and the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP). We show that the intramolecular BRET between Luc and YFP was significantly increased following GPCR activation, suggesting a conformational rearrangement bringing the amino terminus and carboxyl terminus of beta-arr in closer proximity. Kinetic analysis showed that this conformational change follows the initial beta-arr/receptor engagement. In addition to providing new insights into the agonist-induced conformational rearrangements of beta-arr in living cells, the double-brilliance beta-arr offers a universal biosensor for GPCR activation, allowing the study of native receptors in large-scale screening analysis.     

Direct assessment of CXCR4 mutant conformations reveals complex link between receptor structure and G(alpha)(i) activation

Ligand binding to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is thought to induce changes in receptor conformation that translate into activation of downstream effectors. The link between receptor conformation and activity is still insufficiently understood, as current models of GPCR activation fail to take an increasing amount of experimental data into account. To elucidate structure-function relationships in GPCR activation, we used bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to directly assess the conformation of mutants of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. We analyzed substitutions in the arginine cage DRY motif and in the conserved asparagine N(3.35)119, which are pivotal molecular switches for receptor conformation and activation. G(alpha)(i) activation of the mutants was either similar to wild-type CXCR4 (D133N, Y135A, and N119D) or resulted in loss of activity (R134A and N119K). Mutant N119S was constitutively active but further activated by agonist. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis suggested no simple correlation between conformational changes in response to ligand binding and activation of G(alpha)(i) by the mutants. Different conformations of active receptors were detected (for wild-type CXCR4, D133N, and N119S), suggesting that different receptor conformations are able to trigger G(alpha)(i) activity. Several conformations were also found for inactive mutants. These data provide biophysical evidence for different receptor conformations being active with respect to a single readout. They support models of GPCR structure-activity relationships that take this conformational flexibility of active receptors into account.