Knowledge, attitudes, and utilization of BRCA1/2 testing among women with early-onset breast cancer

A total of 2,400 questionnaires were mailed to members of two mid-Atlantic breast cancer awareness/support groups to investigate the association between attitudes, knowledge, and use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with early-onset breast cancer. Of the 493 (21%) questionnaires returned, 406 respondents had a diagnosis of breast cancer, of whom 248 were diagnosed prior to age 50 and included in the analyses. Eighty-three percent (206/248) of these women had heard of BRCA1/2 testing and 12.5% (31/248) had undergone BRCA1/2 testing. Among women who had heard of BRCA1/2 testing, women who had been tested were younger (p = 0.03), more likely to have a college education (p = 0.03), more likely to have a family member who had undergone BRCA1/2 testing (p = 0.005), and had greater knowledge, more positive attitudes, and fewer negative attitudes about BRCA1/2 testing (p = 0.02, p = 0.004, and p = 0.004, respectively). In this sample, knowledge regarding BRCA1/2 testing is high, but uptake of genetic testing is low. Lack of information regarding how genetic testing might alter health-care decisions and fear about the genetic testing procedure, its costs, and possible false-positive results are associated with low uptake of genetic testing. Further education regarding these specific points may enhance the use of genetic testing.     

Motivations and concerns of women considering genetic testing for breast cancer: a comparison between affected and at-risk probands

Since the discovery of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, there has been an increasing demand for breast cancer risk assessment programs. In an effort to understand and serve the population such programs target better, several studies have identified factors influencing high-risk women to pursue breast cancer risk assessment and genetic testing services; none, however, has focused on how the motivations and concerns of at-risk women may differ from their previously affected counterparts, who are typically the initial members of their families to undergo genetic testing. The majority of both previously affected and unaffected women felt that preventative surgery decisions, surveillance practices, the assessment of children's risks, and increased breast cancer anxiety were "more important" or "very important" issues regarding their thoughts about genetic testing. Significantly more affected women deemed family members' opinions "more" or "very important" (p < 0.01). Opinions concerning insurance and employment discrimination did not vary significantly between groups; however, a larger percentage of affected women felt this issue was of importance. Although all issues above should be addressed with women seeking cancer risk assessment and genetic testing, this research may help health care providers to gain a greater understanding of how the motivators and concerns of high-risk women can differ with personal cancer status so that referral, counseling, and education can be executed optimally.     

Diabetes,physical activity and breast cancer among Hispanic women

Purpose: We assessed the association between diabetes and breast cancer and whether physical activity modified the effect of diabetes on breast cancer in Hispanic women. Methods: We used data from a case-control study of breast cancer among Hispanic women aged 30–79 conducted between 2003 and 2008 on the Texas–Mexico border. In-person interviews were completed with 190 incident breast cancer cases ascertained through surgeons and oncologists, and 979 controls who were designated as both high-risk (n = 511) and low-risk (N = 468) for breast cancer (with respective response rates of 97%, 83% and 74%). Results: After adjustment for menopausal status and mammography screening, there was no effect of diabetes on breast cancer risk (high-risk control group odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–1.48; low-risk control group OR 0.87, 0.58–1.30). Women who had a diabetes history and did not exercise were at no risk of breast cancer (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.63–1.48) or a slightly reduced breast cancer risk (low-risk control group OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.46–1.15) depending on the control group used, while women with diabetes who did exercise had significantly reduced breast cancer risk (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21–0.83) regardless of the control group used (high-risk control group p-value for interaction = 0.013, low-risk control group p-value for interaction 0.183). Conclusions: Should other studies confirm our results, physical activity should be explored as a means of reducing breast cancer risk in diabetic women.     

The value of MUTYH testing in patients with early onset microsatellite stable colorectal cancer referred for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer syndrome testing

MUTYH adenomatous polyposis (MAP) can mimic both the familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) phenotypes. As a result of MAP's phenotypic overlap with FAP, some DNA diagnostic laboratories perform MUTYH testing in conjunction with APC testing in patients with suspected FAP or attenuated FAP (AFAP). In addition to testing FAP/AFAP samples for MUTYH mutations, we were interested whether there would also be value in testing samples referred for HNPCC testing. To determine this, we tested a consecutive series of 229 samples referred for HNPCC testing for the two most common MUTYH mutations in the Caucasian population. To enrich our study population with MAP cases, we only included samples from patients with early onset colorectal cancer (CRC diagnosed <50 years old) in whom HNPCC had been excluded by microsatellite instability testing (microsatellite stable or low microsatellite instability). Four biallelic (2%) and six monoallelic (3%) MUTYH mutation carriers were identified. No clinical factors predicted MUTYH mutation status. Specifically, a family history of vertical transmission of CRC or having few polyps (<15) did not rule out the possibility of biallelic MUTYH mutations. Thus, MUTYH mutation testing may be a reasonable cascade test in early onset CRC found to have proficient DNA mismatch repair, regardless of pattern of family history or number of polyps.     

Psychological impact of genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in women of Ashkenazi Jewish background: a prospective study

The recognition that the prevalence of three founder mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is over 2% in Ashkenazi Jews has resulted in numerous epidemiological research studies of this ethno-religious group. To determine the effects of incorporating research into clinical practice, a psychological impact study of women participating in an epidemiological study was conducted. Sixty women of Ashkenazi Jewish background who underwent genetic testing for founder mutations were assessed using mailed, self-administered questionnaires with validated measures of psychological outcome. Forty-three women elected to learn their results and 17 women declined to do so. Women who elected to learn their results were also assessed 7-10 days, 4 months, and 12 months after results disclosure. Women who chose to learn their results had significantly higher baseline breast cancer anxiety, compared to those who elected not to learn their results (z = -2.27; p = 0.023). Unaffected women who elected to learn their results showed a significant decrease in breast cancer anxiety 4 months (z = -2.37, p = 0.018) and 12 months (z = -3.06, p = 0.002) post-notification compared to baseline. Genetic testing for mutations common in Ashkenazi Jewish women with result disclosure does not lead to adverse psychological outcomes.     

The prevalence and correlates of breast cancer among women in Eastern China

The purpose was to investigate the prevalence rate, characteristics and related factors of breast cancer among women in Eastern China. A total of 122,058 female subjects completed the study, with 320 confirmed cases of breast cancer (crude prevalence: 262.5/100,000; standardized prevalence: 207.7/100,000). Among all of the identified breast cancer cases, 91.6% were diagnosed after the age of 35 and 60.0% were diagnosed before menopause. The odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of those breast cancer risk factors as selected through multivariate logistic regression were as follows: 5.438 (1.553-19.004) for family history of breast cancer, 3.556 (1.880-6.728) for high behavior intervention score, 3.556 (0.904-13.994) for history of diabetes, 3.357 (1.131-9.969) for history of benign breast tumors, 2.196 (1.355-3.556) for poor overall life satisfaction, 1.826 (0.995-3.350) for premenopause of breast cancer, 1.528 (1.083-2.155) for high BMI index, 1.500 (0.920-2.446) for poor financial status, 1.497 (1.014-2.211) for multiple miscarriages/abortions, and 1.231 (0.972-1.559) for infrequent consumption of garlic (frequent garlic consumption is a protective factor). There were significantly more cases of breast cancer diagnosed prior to menopause than after menopause, and most of the patients were diagnosed after the age of 35. These findings suggest that attention should be focused on the incidence of breast cancer among premenopausal women older than 35.     

Lung and breast cancer mortality among women in France: Future trends

Estimates of mortality in future years are crucial for communication, prevention and anticipation related to the burden of diseases and for developing scenarios studying the effects of reducing environmental exposure. The aim of this study is to project observed trends of mortality in France for lung and breast cancer among females to 2021. Projections of mortality rates are based on a Bayesian age-period-cohort model and a Poisson distribution. We used cancer mortality data from the French mortality register (period 1977–2006) and population data from population registers (estimated for 1977–2006 and projected for period 2007–2021 using five scenarios: largest, smallest, youngest, older, average population). Alternative models were tested (generalized additive model, negative binomial distribution).For the average population scenario, lung and breast cancer mortality rates age-standardized to the world population, are respectively: 11.5 per 10⁵ women (Credibility interval: 10.3–12.8) and 15.9 (14.4–17.6) in 2007–2011, 14.6 (11.7–18.1) and 14.5 (11.6–18.0) in 2012–2016, 18.2 (12.6–26.0) and 13.3 (9.1–18.9) in 2017–2021.Projections show an ongoing increase for lung cancer and decrease for breast cancer mortality rates, which are expected to be equal in 2012–2016. Compared projections of these two cancers using a similar method had not been done before. Aggressive prevention strategies targeting smoking among women are needed to control this fast growing epidemic of avoidable cancer. Planning of health care capacity for diagnosis and treatment of cancer among females is also necessary.     

Autoimmune thyroid diseases in women with breast cancer and colorectal cancer

The aim of the study was to compare the prevalence of autoimmune thyroid diseases in three groups of women (66 with breast cancer (CaB), 68 with colorectal cancer (CaC) and 49 without oncological diseases as a control group). Serum levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxin (fT4), antibodies to thyroglobulin (TGB-ab) and thyroperoxidase (TPO-ab) and tumor markers CEA, CA 15-3 and CA 19-9 were investigated in all subjects by using the chemiluminiscence method. In contrast to Graves' disease (no observed case), autoimmune thyroiditis was diagnosed in 24.2 % women with CaB (4.5 % euthyroid and 19.7 % with subclinical or overt hypothyroidism), compared to 16.7 % in women with CaC (2.0 % euthyroid and 14.7 % with subclinical or overt hypothyroidism) and 16.2 % controls (4.0 % euthyroid and 12.2 % with subclinical or overt hypothyroidism). Serum levels of TGB-ab were higher in the group with breast cancer as compared to those with colorectal cancer and the control group (medians: 35.80 vs. 31.75 vs. 27.70, p<0.001). Similarly, the percentage of positive TGB-ab and TPO-ab serum levels was higher in women with breast cancer as compared to those with colorectal cancer and the control group. The results of the study support the controversial theory that there is an increased prevalence of autoimmune thyroiditis in women with breast cancer.     

Evaluating genetic association among ovarian, breast, and endometrial cancer: evidence for a breast/ovarian cancer relationship

The possibility of a genetic relationship between ovarian, breast, and endometrial cancer was investigated in data from a large multicenter, population-based, case-control study, the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Age-adjusted relative risks (RRs) for mothers and sisters of 493 ovarian cancer cases, 895 breast cancer cases, and 143 endometrial cancer cases versus 4,754 controls were calculated. Significantly elevated age-adjusted RRs were found for ovarian cancer (RR = 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6-4.9) and breast cancer (RR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.1-2.1) among relatives of ovarian cancer probands and for breast cancer (RR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.7-2.5) and ovarian cancer (RR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.0-2.0) among relatives of breast cancer probands. Relatives of endometrial cancer probands had an elevated RR for endometrial cancer only (RR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.6-4.8). The genetic relationship between ovarian, breast, and endometrial cancer was tested using a multivariate polygenic threshold model developed by Smith (1976), which was modified to accommodate three classes of probands. Estimates of heritability for ovarian, breast, and endometrial cancer were 40%, 56%, and 52%, respectively. There was a significant genetic correlation between ovarian and breast cancer (R12 = .484). Evidence for significant genetic overlap between endometrial cancer and either ovarian or breast cancer was not found. These results suggest the existence of a familial breast/ovarian cancer syndrome. Endometrial cancer, while heritable, appears to be genetically unrelated.     

Radiation-induced breast cancer in women with Hodgkin's disease

Aim and background

The aim of this study is to analyze the main clinical and pathologic characteristics of radiation-induced breast carcinomas (BC) following treatment for Hodgkin''s disease (HD) and to identify the risk factors for their induction. To create a mathematical model for the prediction of expected age at which a BC might develop based on the age at treatment for HD.

Materials and methods

Thirty-nine cases of women with BC that developed after treatment for HD in puberty or adolescence were analyzed retrospectively. The median age at initiation of treatment for HD was 12.9 years (9–21). The median age at diagnosis of the second malignancy – breast carcinoma was 32.4 years (22.9–39).

Results

The distribution of patients according to the clinical T stage of breast cancer was as follows: 11 patients with T1 stage BC (28%), 22 with T2 stage (56%) and 6 with stage T3 (16%). Prevalent were tumors localized in the lateral breast quadrants. The observed 5 year survival was 95%.

Conclusion

The risk of solid tumors, especially breast cancer, is high among women with HD disease who were treated with radiotherapy in their childhood. In this article, we propose a specific mathematical age formula which could be used as predictive equation when the age of the treatment for HD is in the range between 9 and 21 years. Systematic screening for breast cancer in these patients would be significantly important for their health and could improve their survival.     

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older women with early breast cancer - a systematic review of literature

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is an analytical tool increasingly implemented in clinical practice. Breast cancer is primarily a disease of older people; however, most evidence-based research is aimed at younger patients. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was carried out to assess the use of CGA in older breast cancer patients for clinical decision making. The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched. RESULTS: A total of nine useful full text article results were found. Only five of these were exclusively concerned with early breast cancer; thus, studies involving a variety of cancer types, stages and treatments were accepted, as long as they included early breast cancer. The results comprised a series of low sources of evidence. However, all results shared a common theme: the CGA has a use in determining patient suitability for different types of cancer treatment and subsequently maximizing the patient's quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: There is not yet sufficient high level evidence to instate CGA guidelines as a mandatory practice in the management of breast cancer, due to the heterogeneity of available studies. More studies need to be conducted to cement current work on the benefits of the CGA. An area of particular interest is with regard to treatment options, especially surgery and chemotherapy, and identifying patients who may be suitable for these treatments.     

Kinetics of testosterone metabolism in normal postmenopausal women and women with breast cancer

The constant infusion and single injection techniques were utilized to study the kinetics of ³H-testosterone (T) metabolism in postmenopausal women with and without breast cancer. The metabolic clearance rates (mean ± SEM) for normal postmenopausal women were $\text{578 ± 82}\text{and}\text{644 ±128}\text{1}\text{24}\text{h}$ as obtained by the constant infusion and single injection techniques, respectively. The corresponding results for the women with breast cancer (patients) are $\text{644 ± 25}\text{and}\text{617 ± 106}\text{1}\text{24}\text{h}$. The single injection technique yielded values for rate constants (units) and volumes of distribution (1); k₁ = 37.5 ± 1.6 for the normals and 34.5 ±1.9 for the patients. K₂ = 76.6 ± 5.1 for the normals and 71.1 ± 1.6 for the patients, V₁ = 7.9 ± 2.2 for the normals and 8.7 ± 1.4 for the patients and V₂ = 7.0 ± 1.5 for the normals and 6.4 ± 1.2 for the patients. The constant infusion technique yielded values for the conversion ratios for the transformation of T to several products; 4-androstene-3,17-dione/T of 0.02 ± 0.003 for normals and 0.03± 0.002 for patients, 5α-dihydrotestosterone/T of 0.02 ± 0.002 for normals and 0.03 ± 0.002 for patients, estrone/T of 0.04 ± 0.01 for normals and 0.04 ± 0.01 for patients, estradiol-17β/T of 0.02 ± 0.005 for normals and 0.03 ± 0.005 for patients and estrone sulfate/T of O.16 ± 0.02 for normals and 0.24 ± 0.06 for patients. The T plasma concentrations and production rates were similar for the two groups of subjects. Hence there were no significant differences between the normals and the patients for all the kinetic parameters. It was determined that all the estradiol being produced in postmenopausal women could be coming from circulating T.     

A current perspective on genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer: the oral contraceptive decision

A clinician faces a problem in how best to counsel the woman with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer about her options for pregnancy prevention. The physician must guide her as she makes new and complex decisions. Recent data strongly support an amplified effect of the estrogens in oral contraceptives for the woman with a genetic risk for breast cancer. Nonetheless, a woman's immediate need to prevent pregnancy may be much more important to her than worrying about the long-term risk of breast cancer. Another factor is that oral contraceptives prevent ovarian cancer, so the physician may wish to prescribe them to protect her from ovarian cancer. In some genetic backgrounds, however, oral contraceptives not only do not prevent ovarian cancer, but they may raise the risk of breast cancer so significantly that they should not be taken. With other genetic backgrounds, oral contraceptives will protect the woman from ovarian cancer without much effect on her breast cancer risk. When does each of these cancer risks or benefits become significant? The clinician can provide an important benefit to a woman who must prevent pregnancy yet worries about her cancer risk. The physician can help her evaluate the evidence, with its gaps and uncertainties, in the context of her own preferences. To assist in this evaluation, this decision aid provides base-line estimates of the cancer risk that accompanies each of a woman's options. In some cases, genetic testing is likely to provide valuable information as she makes choices about contraception and the risks vs. benefits of different alternatives available to her.