Multiple signaling pathways control nitrogen-mediated root elongation in maize

Response of root system architecture to nutrient availability is an essential way for plants to adapt to soil environments. Nitrogen can affect root development either as a result of changes in the external concentration, or through changes in the internal nutrient status of the plant. Low soil N stimulates root elongation in maize. Recent evidence suggests that plant hormones auxin and cytokinin, as well as NO signaling pathway, are involved in the regulation of root elongation by low nitrogen nutrition.Key words: nitrogen, root growth, auxin, cytokinin, NONitrogen acquisition is determined by N demand for plant growth. At low N stress, N demand for maximum plant growth rate is not matched by plant N uptake. To acquire adequate N, plants may increase root length density to explore a larger soil volume and/or increase N uptake activity. High root density is also an important root trait for competition with soil microorganisms.¹ Since nitrate is a highly mobile, non-adsorbing ion, theoretic analysis predicts that its uptake is not limited by transport through soil, and a small root system is sufficient for nitrate acquisition.^2–4 In field conditions, however, genotypes that are efficient in N acquisition generally had a larger root system and higher root length density.^5,6 Under conditions of insufficient N supply, N mass flow to roots may not be adequate to meet the N demand for plant growth. Even in N-sufficient soils, various soil constraints (low water content, etc) may reduce the N mass flow rate. In these cases, large root size and high density will be very important for the utilization of the spatially distributed N, especially newly mineralized N, and the competition for organic N with soil microorganisms.^7,8The development of lateral roots in Arabidopsis in response to nitrate supply has been widely studied.⁹ Less attention has been paid to primary root growth in response to N, possibly because root elongtion is insensitive to increased N supply in Arabidopsis.^10,11 In maize, however, root elongation was sigificantly promoted by suboptimal N supply, and inhibited by overdose supply of N (Fig. 1).^12,13 Until recently less is known about the underlying physiological mechansms. It is well documented that cytokinin is a root-to-shoot signal communicating N availability in addition to nitrate itself.¹⁴ Exogenous cytokinin application suppresses the elongation of primary roots.¹⁵ Recent work in Arabidopsis overexpressing cytokinin synthase (IPT) demonstrate that long-term CK overproduction inhibited primary root elongation by reducing quantitative parameters of primary root meristem.¹⁶ By comparing two maize inbred lines whose root elongation had a differential response to low N stress, it was found that the change of cytokinin content in roots was closely related to low-N induced root elongation.¹³ In the N-sensitive genotype 478, cytokinin (Zeatin + Zeatin riboside) content was significantly lower at low N condition. While in N-insensitive genotype Wu312, cytokinin content was hardly affected at various N supplies. Higher N supply shortened the distance from root apex to the first visible lateral roots, a phenomenen similar to that caused by exogenous cytokinins. Furthermore, exogenous cytokinin 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) completely reversed the stimulatory effect of low nitrate on root elongation. All the data suggests that the inhibitory effect of high concentration of nitrate on root elongation is, at least in part, mediated by increased cytokinin level in roots.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Root elongation is inhibited at high nitrate supply.Auxin regulates many cellular responses crucial for plant development. Auxin plays a key role in establishing and elaborating patterns in root meristems.^17,18 Root elongation of Arabidopsis is enhanced by exogenous auxin at low concentrations, but is inhibited at high concentrations.¹⁹ In an earlier report, a high external nitrate supply (8 mM) did cause a 70% decrease in the auxin concentration of the root in soybean.²⁰ In maize, inhibition of root growth by high nitrate was found closely related to the reduction of IAA levels in roots and exogenous NAA and IAA restored primary root growth in high nitrate concentrations.²¹ Interesting, it was found that auxin concentrations in phloem exudates were reduced by a greater nitrate supply, suggesting that shoot-to-root auxin transport may be inhibited by high N supply. Considering the antagonism between auxin and cytokinin.²² it was possible that, by increasing the cytokinin level and decreasing the auxin level, high nitrate supply may have negative influences on root apex activity so that root apical dominance is weakened and, therefore, root elongation is suppressed and lateral roots grow closer to the root apex.Nitric oxide (NO) is emerging as an important messenger molecule associated with many biochemical and physiological processes in plants. The involvement of NO in IAA-induced adventitious root development has also been reported.²³ Given that nitrate is a substrate for NR-catalysed NO production, and root development and growth are closely related to NO, it is expected that NO may play a role in nitrate-dependent root growth. Surprisingly, endogenous levels of NO in the root apices of maize seedlings grown in high nitrate solution were much lower than those in apices grown in low nitrate. The nitrate-induced inhibition of root elongation in maize was markedly reversed by treatments of the roots with a NO donor (SNP) and IAA.²⁴ These data suggest that the arrest of root elongation by high levels of external nitrate concentrations may result from an alteration of endogenous NO levels in root apical cells. NR mediated NO production is unlikely to be involved in the nitrate-dependent NO production and root elongation because NR activity is lower at low N supply. A NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor reduced root elongation in maize plants grown in the low-nitrate medium, suggest that NOS activity may be inhibited in plants grown in high-nitrate solution, thus leading to a reduction of the endogenous NO levels.Taken together, high nitrogen supply increases cytokinin level, but decreases auxin and NO levels in roots of maize. Besides, it was well documented ethylene has a negative effect on root elongation of various plants.^25–27 Exogenous supply of cytokinin increase ethylene production (Stenlid 1982; Bertell et al., 1990). Recently, it was demonstrated in Arabidopsis that auxin transport from the root apex via the lateral root cap is required for ethylene-mediated inhibition of root growth.²⁸ Therefore, a complex multiple siganlling pathways may be involved in N-mediated root elongation (Fig. 2). Further study is required to understand how these pathways interact with each other to reduce root elongation in response to high nitrate supply.Open in a separate windowFigure 2A simplified model explaining nitogen-mediated root elongation in maize.     

Modulation of root branching by a coumarin derivative

A healthy root system is crucial to plant growth and survival. To maintain efficiency of root function, plants have to dynamically modulate root system architecture through various adaptive mechanisms such as lateral root formation to respond to a changing and diversified soil environment. Exogenous application of a coumarin derivative, 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU), in Arabidopsis thaliana inhibits seed germination by mainly reducing primary root growth. UDP-glycosyltransferases play an integral role in the biochemical mechanism of 4-MU detoxification in plant roots.1 However, 4-MU treatment also dramatically led to increased lateral root initiation, elongation and density. Moreover, marked root bending at the root-hypocotyl junction and auxin redistribution appeared to contribute to the 4-MU-mediated lateral root formation. We propose that 4-MU would serve as a useful chemical tool to study auxin-mediated root branching.Plant roots are required for the acquisition of water and nutrients, for response to abiotic and biotic factors in the soil, and to anchor the plant in the ground.² To maintain efficiency of root function, plants have to dynamically modulate root system architecture (RSA) by regulation of primary root growth, lateral root (LR) formation and elongation and root hair increase.² Recent studies on root patterning have made significant progress toward understanding the molecular and physiological basis of RSA.³ For example, auxin synthesis, transport and distribution are required for LR initiation and primordium development.² However, determination of the underlying RSA patterning mechanism remains to be elucidated.Coumarins are a group of natural products in plants that originate from the general phenylpropanoid pathway.⁴ They are often found to accumulate in the root tissues⁵ and are involved in plant defense, root development and nitrogen uptake and metabolism.^1,6-8 Some coumarins also receive attention for their pharmacological properties. For example, 4-MU is a potent apoptotic agent with strong anti-invasive and antiangiogenic properties against prostate cancer cells.⁹We have demonstrated that exogenous 4-MU was accumulated in the root system in a concentration-dependent manner. After continuous exposure to 4-MU, growth of the primary roots exhibited a dosage-dependent inhibition of root length, whereas the growth of cotyledon and hypocotyls was not significantly changed. Moreover, 4-MU was found to be glycosylated to 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucoside (4-MU-Glc) by UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGTs) for detoxification.¹ Here we report that marked bending of the primary roots and auxin redistribution in root system contributes to 4-MU-induced root branching. After exposure to 125 µM 4-MU for 6 d, the primary root length was reduced by 25% compared with the untreated seedlings, but the first LR emerged at the root-hypocotyl junction 3 d earlier in the Arabidopsis DR5::GUS lines compared with untreated seedlings. The GUS activity and distribution in the primary roots of DR5::GUS seedlings were coordinately regulated in response to 4-MU treatment (Fig. 1A-D). Interestingly, primary root shape was also affected upon 4-MU treatment as evidenced by marked bending of the primary roots followed by emergence of lateral roots at the root-hypocotyl junctions. As the roots grew, the bend continued to develop and a hook formed at the root-hypocotyl junction (Fig. 1F). After exposure to 125 μM 4-MU for 22 d, abundant lateral roots formed from the bent region (Fig. 1F). We also observed that auxin accumulation in the bent region was significantly reduced after root branching was well established, compared with the untreated plants (Fig. 1E and F). It has been demonstrated that LR formation can be induced mechanically by either gravitropic curvature or by transient bending.^10,11 We suggest that 4-MU-induced LR proliferation is triggered by both mechanical bending of the primary roots at the root-hypocotyl junctions and the local auxin redistribution.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Changes of auxin distribution in response to 4-MU as observed using DR5::GUS reporter fusion. (A) Auxin accumulation in root-hypocotyl junction after exposure to 125 µM 4-MU for 6 d. (B-D) Detection of 4-MU accumulation in root under UV (325 nm). (B) Brightfield; (C) UV channel (325 nm); (D) Merge of (B) and (C). (E) An untreated root system of 22-d-old DR5::GUS seedling. (F) A root system of 22-d-old DR5::GUS seedling in the presence of 125 µM 4-MU. Asterisks indicate the localization of auxin accumulation. It was noted that LR formation upon 4-MU treatment was closely associated with auxin distribution and 4-MU accumulation in roots.Our finding of 4-MU-dependent root patterning is intriguing in light of the important role of RSA in plant physiology. Given that LR initiation is stimulated by 4-MU and that this compound is effectively detoxified in plant roots by glycosylation, a new way to augment root function could be provided through applying 4-MU to modulate RSA. In addition, 4-MU could serve as a useful chemical tool for understanding auxin-mediated root branching, for example, by screening Arabidopsis mutants in the presence of this compound.Coumarins synthesis from phenylpropanoid precursors occurs with an especially high number of structural variations in higher plants via numerous possible modifications at specific positions of the benzene ring.^4,5 For example, hydroxylation of coumarins at 6-position catalyzed by a 2-oxoglutarate-dependant dioxygenase (F6''H1) is important for the biosynthesis of scopoletin.¹² Coumarin synthesis in Arabidopsis plants can result in the accumulation of umbelliferone and its derivative skimmin but not 4-MU⁵ in which 4-MU possesses a pivotal methyl group at the 4-position of the benzene ring. Our results suggest that 4-MU uptake does not benefit plant growth as it is a phytotoxic compound found to inhibit primary root growth and seed germination. This finding explains why Arabidopsis plants do not naturally accumulate 4-MU and its derivatives. Nevertheless, 4-MU has been found and isolated from other higher plants such as Dalbergia volubilis and Eupatorium pauciflorum, indicating the existence of a biosynthetic pathway leading to the formation of 4-MU in nature.¹³     

Localized auxin biosynthesis and postembryonic root development in Arabidopsis

Auxin is a phytohormone essential for plant development. Due to the high redundancy in auxin biosynthesis, the role of auxin biosynthesis in embryogenesis and seedling development, vascular and flower development, shade avoidance and ethylene response were revealed only recently. We previously reported that a vitamin B₆ biosynthesis mutant pdx1 exhibits a short-root phenotype with reduced meristematic zone and short mature cells. By reciprocal grafting, we now have found that the pdx1 short root is caused by a root locally generated signal. The mutant root tips are defective in callus induction and have reduced DR5::GUS activity, but maintain relatively normal auxin response. Genetic analysis indicates that pdx1 mutant could suppress the root hair and root growth phenotypes of the auxin overproduction mutant yucca on medium supplemented with tryptophan (Trp), suggesting that the conversion from Trp to auxin is impaired in pdx1 roots. Here we present data showing that pdx1 mutant is more tolerant to 5-methyl anthranilate, an analogue of the Trp biosynthetic intermediate anthranilate, demonstrating that pdx1 is also defective in the conversion from anthranilate to auxin precursor tryptophan. Our data suggest that locally synthesized auxin may play an important role in the postembryonic root growth.Key words: auxin synthesis, root, PLP, PDX1The plant hormone auxin modulates many aspects of growth and development including cell division and cell expansion, leaf initiation, root development, embryo and fruit development, pattern formation, tropism, apical dominance and vascular tissue differentiation.^1–3 Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is the major naturally occurring auxin. IAA can be synthesized in cotyledons, leaves and roots, with young developing leaves having the highest capacity.^4,5Auxin most often acts in tissues or cells remote from its synthetic sites, and thus depends on non-polar phloem transport as well as a highly regulated intercellular polar transport system for its distribution.²The importance of local auxin biosynthesis in plant growth and development has been masked by observations that impaired long-distance auxin transport can result in severe growth or developmental defects.^3,6 Furthermore, a few mutants with reduced free IAA contents display phenotypes similar to those caused by impaired long-distance auxin transport. These phenotypes include defective vascular tissues and flower development, short primary roots and reduced apical dominance, or impaired shade avoidance and ethylene response.^7–15 Since these phenotypes most often could not be rescued by exogenous auxin application, it is difficult to attribute such defects to altered local auxin biosynthesis. By complementing double, triple or quadruple mutants of four Arabidopsis shoot-abundant auxin biosynthesis YUCCA genes with specific YUCCA promoters driven bacterial auxin biosynthesis iaaM gene, Cheng et al. provided unambiguous evidence that auxin biosynthesis is indispensable for embryo, flower and vascular tissue development.^8,13 Importantly, it is clear that auxin synthesized by YUCCAs is not functionally interchangeable among different organs, supporting the notion that auxin synthesized by YUCCAs mainly functions locally or in a short range.^6,8,13The central role of auxin in root meristem patterning and maintenance is well documented,^1,2,16 but the source of such IAA is still unclear. When ¹⁴C-labeled IAA was applied to the five-day-old pea apical bud, the radioactivity could be detected in lateral root primordia but not the apical region of primary roots.¹⁷ Moreover, removal of the shoot only slightly affected elongation of the primary root, and localized application of auxin polar transport inhibitor naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) at the primary root tip exerted more profound inhibitory effect on root elongation than at any other site.¹⁸ These results suggest that auxin generated near the root tip may play a more important role in primary root growth than that transported from the shoot. In line with this notion, Arabidopsis roots have been shown to harbor multiple auxin biosynthesis sites including root tips and the region upward from the tip.⁴Many steps of tryptophan synthesis and its conversion to auxin involve transamination reactions, which require the vitamin B₆ pyridoxal 5-phosphate (PLP) as a cofactor. We previously reported that the Arabidopsis mutant pdx1 that is defective in vitamin B₆ biosynthesis displays dramatically reduced primary root growth with smaller meristematic zone and shorter mature cortical cells.¹⁹ In the current investigation, we found that the root tips of pdx1 have reduced cell division capability and reduced DR5::GUS activity, although the induction of this reporter gene by exogenous auxin was not changed. Reciprocal grafting indicates that the short-root phenotype of pdx1 is caused by a root local rather than shoot generated factor(s). Importantly, pdx1 suppresses yucca mutant, an auxin overproducer, in root hair proliferation although it fails to suppress the hypocotyl elongation phenotype.²⁰ Our work thus demonstrated that pdx1 has impaired root local auxin biosynthesis from tryptophan. To test whether the synthesis of tryptophan is also affected in pdx1 mutant, we planted pdx1 together with wild-type seeds on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 5-mehtyl-anthranilate (5-MA), an analogue of the Trp biosynthetic intermediate anthranilate.²¹ Although pdx1 seedlings grew poorly under the control conditions, the growth of wild-type seedlings was more inhibited than that of the pdx1 seedlings on 10 µM 5-MA media (Fig. 1A–D). Compared with the elongated primary root on MS, wild-type seedlings showed very limited root growth on 5-MA (Fig. 1E). The relatively increased tolerance to 5-MA of pdx1 thus indicates that the pdx1 mutant may be defective in Trp biosynthesis, although amino acid analysis of the bulked seedlings did not find clear changes in Trp levels in the mutants (our unpublished data).Open in a separate windowFigure 1The pdx1 mutant seedlings are relatively less sensitive to toxic 5-methyl anthranilate (5-MA). (A and C) Five-day-old seedlings of the wild type (Col-0) (A) or pdx1 (C) on MS medium. (B and D) Five-day-old seedlings of the wild type (B) or pdx1 (D) on MS medium supplemented with 10 µM 5-MA. (E) Eight-day-old seedlings of the wild type or pdx1 on MS medium without or with 10 µM 5-MA supplement. Sterilized seeds were planted directly on the indicated medium and after two days of cold treatment, the plates were incubated under continuous light at 22–24°C before taking pictures.We reported that PDX1 is required for tolerance to oxidative stresses in Arabidopsis.¹⁹ Interestingly, redox homeostasis appears to play a critical role in Arabidopsis root development. The glutathione-deficient mutant root meristemless1 (rml1) and the vitamin C-deficient mutant vitamin C1 (vtc1) both have similar stunted roots.^22,23 Nonetheless, pdx1 is not rescued by either glutathione or vitamin C¹⁹ suggesting that the pdx1 short-root phenotype may not be resulted from a general reduction of antioxidative capacity. Interestingly, ascorbate oxidase is found to be highly expressed in the maize root quiescent center.²⁴ This enzyme can oxidatively decarboxylate auxin in vitro, suggesting that the quiescent center may be a site for metabolizing auxin to control its homeostasis.²⁵ It is therefore likely that the reduced auxin level in pdx1 root tips could be partially caused by increased auxin catabolism resulted from reduced vitamin B₆ level. We thus conducted experiments to test this possibility. A quiescent center-specific promoter WOX5 driven bacterial auxin biosynthetic gene iaaH²⁶ was introduced into pdx1 mutant. The transgenic seeds were planted on media supplemented with different concentrations of indoleacetamide (IAM), the substrate of iaaH protein. Although promotion of lateral root growth was observed at higher IAM concentrations, which indicates increased tryptophan-independent auxin production from the transgene, no change in root elongation was observed between pdx1 with or without the WOX5::iaaH transgene at any concentration of IAM tested (data not shown), suggesting that the pdx1 short-root phenotype may not be due to increased auxin catabolism.Taken together, in addition to auxin transport; temporally, spatially or developmentally coordinated local auxin biosynthesis defines the plant growth and its response to environmental changes.^8,14,15     

Lysigenous aerenchyma formation in maize root is confined to cortical cells by regulation of genes related to generation and scavenging of reactive oxygen species

To adapt to waterlogging, maize (Zea mays) forms lysigenous aerenchyma in root cortex as a result of ethylene-promoted programmed cell death (PCD). Respiratory burst oxidase homolog (RBOH) gene encodes a homolog of gp91^phox in NADPH oxidase, and has a role in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Recently, we found that during aerenchyma formation, RBOH was upregulated in all maize root tissues examined, whereas an ROS scavengingrelated metallothionein (MT) gene was downregulated specifically in cortical cells. Together these changes should lead to high accumulations of ROS in root cortex, thereby inducing PCD for aerenchyma formation. As further evidence of the involvement of ROS in root aerenchyma formation, the PCD was inhibited by diphenyleneiodonium (DPI), an NADPH oxidase inhibitor. Based on these results, we propose a model of cortical cell-specific PCD for root aerenchyma formation.Key words: aerenchyma, ethylene, laser microdissection, maize (Zea mays), metallothionein, programmed cell death, reactive oxygen species, respiratory burst oxidase homologIn both wetland and non-wetland plants, lysigenous aerenchyma is formed in roots by creating gas spaces as a result of death and subsequent lysis of some cortical cells, and allows internal transport of oxygen from shoots to roots under waterlogged soil conditions.^1–3 In rice (Oryza sativa) and some other wetland plant species, lysigenous aerenchyma is constitutively formed under aerobic conditions, and is further enhanced under waterlogged conditions.⁴ On the other hand, in non-wetland plants, including maize (Zea mays), lysigenous aerenchyma does not normally form under well-drained soil conditions, but is induced by waterlogging.⁵ Ethylene is involved in lysigenous aerenchyma formation,^1–3,6,7 but the molecular mechanisms are unclear.We recently identified two reactive oxygen species (ROS)-related genes that were specifically regulated in maize root cortex by waterlogged conditions, but not in the presence of an ethylene perception inhibitor 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP).⁵ One was respiratory burst oxidase homolog (RBOH), which has a role in ROS generation and the other was metallothionein (MT), which has a role in ROS scavenging. These results suggest that ROS has a role in ethylene signaling in the PCD that occurs during lysigenous aerenchyma formation.     

Microgravity environment uncouples cell growth and cell proliferation in root meristematic cells: The mediator role of auxin

Experiments performed in space have evidenced that, in root meristematic cells, the absence of gravity results in the uncoupling of cell growth and cell proliferation, two essential cellular functions that support plant growth and development, which are strictly coordinated under normal ground gravity conditions. In space, cell proliferation appears enhanced whereas cell growth is depleted. Since coordination of cell growth and proliferation is a major feature of meristematic cells, the observed uncoupling is a serious stress condition for these cells producing important alterations in the developmental pattern of the plant. Auxin plays a major role in these processes both by assuring the coupling of cell growth and proliferation under normal conditions and by exerting a decisive influence in the uncoupling under altered gravity conditions. Auxin is a mediator of the transduction of the gravitropic signal and its distribution in the root is altered subsequent to a change in the gravity conditions. This altered distribution may produce changes in the expression of specific growth coordinators leading to the alteration of cell cycle and protein synthesis. Therefore, available data indicate that the effects of altered gravity on cell growth and proliferation are the consequence of the transduction of the gravitropic signal perceived by columella cells, in the root tip.Key words: cell cycle, ribosome biogenesis, nucleolus, auxin efflux, graviperception, space flight, arabidopsisThe size and morphology of plants and of plant organs is basically determined by cellular activities that occur in meristems. The primary meristems are root and shoot apical meristems, located at both upper and lower ends of the plant, which are constituted by stem cells. Cell division in these meristems is required to supply new cells for expansion and differentiation of tissues and initiation of new organs, providing the basic structure of the plant body.¹ In turn, active protein synthesis is required after mitosis in order to promote the necessary cell growth, up to duplication of cell size, which will make possible a new cell division. This continuous activity of growth and proliferation in meristematic cells is controlled by auxin, whose distribution in roots sets up distinct zones for cell division, cell expansion and differentiation and determines the balance between them.^2,3Therefore, cell growth and proliferation are essential functions for plant development and they are involved in the developmental response to environmental stimuli, such as tropisms and defense mechanisms against both biotic and abiotic agents.^4–6 Gravity is a fundamental environmental condition, constant in the Earth as a factor conditioning life throughout its whole history. Plants are particularly affected by gravity in their growth, which is directed by the gravity vector producing the well known process of gravitropism.An experiment aimed to know the effects of a weightless environment on cell proliferation and growth in root meristematic cells was performed in the International Space Station. It consisted of germinating seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana in space and then growing seedlings for four days at the constant temperature of 22°C, in the darkness. Seedlings were fixed when still in space and recovered on ground to be processed for microscopical study. In addition, samples from a previous space experiment, grown in a similar way but fixed differently and including a control flight experiment in a 1 g centrifuge, were also incorporated to the analysis.^7,8 This analysis consisted of biometrical estimations of the seedling and root length, quantitative measurements at the cellular level, including number of cells per millimeter in specific cell files, in order to get an estimate of the cell proliferation rate, and morphometrical, ultrastructural and immunocytochemical study of the nucleolus, in order to know the rate of ribosome biogenesis, as an estimation of the level of protein synthesis, which is the cellular process which determines cell growth in the root meristem. Data obtained from space-flown samples were compared with 1 g ground controls and also with data from samples grown in the same conditions in a device called “Random Positioning Machine”, an efficient simulator of microgravity, which induces constant changes of the gravity vector as it is sensed by living samples.⁹ The results interestingly showed an enhanced rate of cell proliferation accompanied by a reduction of ribosome biogenesis per cell in samples grown in both real and simulated microgravity, compared to 1 g controls, either in flight or on ground.¹⁰ This alteration of essential cellular processes may go far beyond the mere change in specific physiological activities of a particular cell type, since, on the one hand, alteration of cell growth and proliferation in the root meristem may have consequences at the level of development and shaping of the whole plant; on the other hand, regulation of these cellular activities by auxin may put in connection these cellular alterations with the transduction cascade of the gravitropic signal perceived by columella cells in the root tip, which is altered when the environmental gravity conditions change and which finally results in the modification of the levels and distribution of auxin throughout the root.     

Root tips moving through soil: An intrinsic vulnerability

Root elongation occurs by the generation of new cells from meristematic tissue within the apical 1–2 mm region of root tips. Therefore penetration of the soil environment is carried out by newly synthesized plant tissue, whose cells are inherently vulnerable to invasion by pathogens. This conundrum, on its face, would seem to reflect an intolerable risk to the successful establishment of root systems needed for plant life. Yet root tip regions housing the meristematic tissues repeatedly have been found to be free of microbial infection and colonization. Even when spore germination, chemotaxis, and/or growth of pathogens are stimulated by signals from the root tip, the underlying root tissue can escape invasion. Recent insights into the functions of root border cells, and the regulation of their production by transient exposure to external signals, may shed light on long-standing observations.Key words: border cells, chemotaxis, zoospores, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)…The evidence suggests that there has evolved within plants, mechanisms for extremely rapid adjustment to changes in the soil environment. The logical conclusion is that plants can and do selectively manipulate the ecological balances within the rhizosphere to their own advantage.¹“Sloughed root cap cells” that detach from the root tip were long presumed to be moribund tissue serving to lubricate passage of the elongating root.² The discovery nearly a century ago that these cells from Zea mays L. and Pisum sativum L. can remain 100% viable for weeks after detachment into hydroponic culture did not alter this perception.³ In recent decades, studies have shown that the cells from root caps of most species are metabolically active and can survive even after detachment into the soil.⁴ Moreover, the cell populations express distinct patterns of gene expression reflecting tissue specialization and were therefore given the name root ‘border’ cells.⁵ Like ‘border towns’ that exist at the boundary of disparate countries and cultures, border cells are part of the plant and part of the soil, yet distinct from both.The soil is a dynamic environment whose pH, surface charge, water availability, texture and composition can range markedly on a large and small scale.^1,6,7 The concept of a ‘microniche’ emphasizes that the biological requirements for a particular soil microorganism may be met within one site but not another site only a micron away.⁸ Thus, the rhizosphere—the region adjacent to root surfaces—can support much higher levels of microorganisms than bulk soil a few millimeters distant.⁹ This phenomenon is recognized to be driven by an increased availability of nutrients released from plants into the external environment.¹⁰ Less well recognized is the dynamic variation that occurs along the root surface, and its significance in patterns of disease development. As roots emerge and the new tissue differentiates progressively through stages from root cap, root apical meristem, elongation zone, and finally mature roots with lignified cell walls, the material released into the environment also changes.^11–13 More than 90% of bulk carbon released from young roots of legumes is delivered by the root cap, a 1 mm zone at the apex.¹⁴ Some pathogens are attracted specifically to the root tip region, presumably in response to such exudates.^15,16 For example, instantaneous swarming occurs when a cotton root is placed into a suspension of Pythium dissotocum zoospores (Sup. Fig. 1). This host-specific attraction is specific to the root tip region where border cells are present (Sup. Fig. 2). Border cells remain attractive to zoospores when removed from the root (Sup. Fig. 3). The nature of the attractant is not known, but its impact is localized and transient (Sup. Fig. 4).Newly generated tissue is highly susceptible to infection by pathogens, in general, so elongating root tips would be predicted to be vulnerable to invasion. And yet, root apices repeatedly have been found to escape infection and colonization.^17–19 Recent discoveries about parallels between mammalian white blood cells and root border cells may provide new insight into this apparent conundrum.²⁰ Neutrophils, a type of white blood cell, are produced in response to infection. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) then attract and kill the invader through a process that requires extracellular DNA (exDNA) and an array of extracellular proteins.^21,22 Border cell production, like that of neutrophils, also is induced in response to signals from pathogens and root tip resistance to infection requires exDNA and an array of extracellular proteins.^20,23 Root tip specific chemotaxis, like that seen with Pythium zoospores, has been presumed to involve steps in a process of pathogen invasion.^15,16 It may, instead, involve a process of extracellular trapping and killing by cells designed to protect root meristems from invasion, in a manner analogous to that which occurs in mammalian defense. If tests confirm this model, the mystery of how root tips escape infection by soilborne pathogens they attract could be resolved.     

EZ-Rhizo software: The gateway to root architecture analysis

Plants are sessile organisms that have to cope with the available nutritional resources and environmental constraints in the place where they germinate. To fully exploit their nearby resources, they have evolved a highly plastic and responsive root system. Adaptations to limited nutrients include a wide range of specific root responses, e.g., the emergence of new root types, root branching or specific growth of lateral roots. These root system architecture (RSA) features are of utmost importance when investigating the underlying mechanisms by forward, reverse or quantitative genetic approaches. The EZ-Rhizo software was developed to facilitate such root measurements in a fast, simple and accurate way. The performances of EZ-Rhizo in providing about 20 primary and derived RSA parameters were illustrated by looking at natural variability across 23 Arabidopsis accessions. The different RSA profiles obtained from plants grown in favorable condition illustrated the wide reservoir of natural genetic resources underlying specific features of root growth. This diversity was used here to correlate the RSA genetic variability with growth, development and environmental properties of accession origins.Key words: Arabidopsis thaliana, root architecture, image analysis, software, natural variationUptake of water and mineral nutrients from the soil is essential for plant life. The root system achieves these fundamental functions through its highly responsive and plastic morphology, which allows plants to exploit fully the soil physico-chemical resources. The geometry of different parts of the root system defines the so-called root system architecture. RSA is broadly determined by the genetic make-up of the plant and is subject to the abiotic and biotic environment of the root, as well as the physiological status of the plant.^1,2 Among environmental factors, the availability of nutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) best illustrates the influence of the soil environment on RSA.^3–6 Specific root responses to nutrient and other abiotic stresses are routinely used to characterise mutants⁷ but the lack of an efficient means to capture RSA in a fast and effective way hampers forward genetic screens based on RSA other than the main root length. RSA has been used in quantitative trait locus (QTL) approaches to identify the molecular basis of intrinsic or environmental factors of RSA.^8–11 Again, only a small number of quantitative studies¹² have taken into account other RSA parameters than the main root length, mainly because of the lack of efficient tools to capture them comprehensively. To overcome this technical difficulty, the computer program EZ-Rhizo was developed and now allows fast and accurate measurement of RSA features from Arabidopsis plants growing on a vertical support.¹³ The software performs RSA analysis in a few user-supervised steps from a scanned Petri dish. The software measures 10 or more primary RSA parameters (Fig. 1) from which several other parameters are derived (e.g., lateral root density, branched zone length). The results are stored in a user-friendly database which can be queried to find specific data or exported for use in other programs such as Microsoft® Excel®.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Schematic representation of RSA parameters measured by EZ-Rhizo. Main root (MR) primary features: path length (dashed line), vector length (grey arrow), vector angle (α), number of lateral root (LR, black dots). MR derived features: straightness (path:vector lengths), MR root depth (d), basal zone (path length between the root collar and the position of the first LR, white box on the left side), branched zone (path length between the first and the last LR position, grey box on the left side) and apical zone (path length from the position of the last LR to the root tip, black box on the left side), LR density over the MR, LR density over the branched zone. Lateral root (1^st or n order) primary features: position on the MR (or on the LRn-1), path length, vector length, vector angle, number of LRn+1 (open dots). Derived LR features: straightness (path:vector lengths). Overall root feature: total root size (sum of all root path length). LR (or LRn) are numbered according to their position on the MR (or LRn-1). LR parameters are illustrated here only for LR1.Providing the EZ-Rhizo program as a freeware (http://EZ-Rhizo.psrg.org.uk) should therefore open the gate to fast and accurate RSA measurements and contribute to better progress in understanding RSA behavior. As an example to illustrate EZ-Rhizo performances, we used Arabidopsis natural variation to measure multiple RSA parameters across 23 Arabidopsis accessions grown on vertical Petri dishes in half-strength MS medium.¹³ The high natural RSA variation observed across these accessions was used in an attempt to find correlations between RSA and in vitro growth, development as well as the environment of accession origins (geography, climatology).     

Redox regulation of auxin signaling and plant development in Arabidopsis

Thioredoxin (NTR/TRX) and glutathione (GSH/GRX) are the two major systems that play a key role in the maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis. They are essential for plant development, cell division or the response to environmental stresses. In a recent article,¹ we studied the interplay between the NADP-linked thioredoxin and glutathione systems in auxin signaling genetically, by associating TRX reductase (ntra ntrb) and glutathione biosynthesis (cad2) mutations. We show that these two thiol reduction pathways interfere with developmental processes. This occurs through modulation of auxin activity as shown by genetic analyses of loss of function mutations in a triple ntra ntrb cad2 mutant. The triple mutant develops almost normally at the rosette stage but fails to generate lateral organs from the inflorescence meristem, producing almost naked stems that are reminiscent of mutants affected in PAT (polar auxin transport) or biosynthesis. The triple mutant exhibits other defects in processes regulated by auxin, including a loss of apical dominance, vasculature defects and reduced secondary root production. Furthermore, it has lower auxin (IAA) levels and decreased capacity for PAT, suggesting that the NTR and glutathione pathways influence inflorescence meristem development through regulation of auxin transport and metabolism.Key words: arabidopsis, NTS pathway, NGS pathway, thioredoxin (TRX), glutaredoxine (GRX), polar auxin transport (PAT), auxin biosynthesis, pin-like phenotype, apical dominance, meristematic activityExposure of living organisms to environmental stresses triggers various defense and developmental responses. Redox signaling is involved in many aspects of these responses.^2–6 The key players in these responses are the NADPH-dependent glutathione/glutaredoxin system (NGS) and the NADPH-dependent thioredoxin system (NTS). TRX and GRX play key roles in the maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis.^7–10 Genetic approaches aiming to identify functions of TRX and GRX in knock-out plants have largely been limited by the absence of phenotypes of single mutants, presumably due to functional redundancies among members of the multigene families of TRX and GRX.¹¹ Interplay between NTS and NGS pathways have been studied in different organisms^12–17 and association of mutants involved in these two pathways have recently revealed new functions in several aspects of plant development.^4–6     

Assessing fungal root colonization for plant improvement

Fungal endophytes display a broad range of symbiotic interactions with their host plants. Current studies on their biology, diversity and benefits are unravelling their high relevance on plant adaptation to environmental stresses. Implementation of such properties may open new perspectives in agriculture and forestry. We aim to exploit the endophytic capacities of the fungal species Fusarium equiseti, a naturally occurring root endophyte which has shown antagonism to plant pathogens, and Pochonia chlamydosporia, a nematophagous fungus with putative endophytic behavior, for plant protection and adaptation to biotic and abiotic stress. A real-time PCR protocol for quantification of the fungal population, together with Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation with the GFP gene for confocal microscopy analyses, were designed and applied to assess endophytic development of both these fungal species. Although quantification of both F. equiseti and P. chlamydosporia yielded similar degrees of root colonization, microscopical observations demonstrated differences in infection and development patterns. Furthermore, we found evidences of plant response against endophyte colonization, supporting a balanced antagonism between the endophyte virulence and the plant defenses. Optimization and application of the methodologies presented herein will allow elucidation of beneficial interactions among these endophytes and their host plants.Key words: endophytes, Fusarium equiseti, fungal detection, mutualism, Pochonia chlamydosporia, root colonizationTissues of nearly all plants in natural ecosystems appear to be colonized by endophytic fungi, whose importance in plant development and distribution seem to be crucial, but not yet clearly understood. Fungal endophytes may assist their host plants for adaptation to habitat, protection against biotic or abiotic stresses, plant growth promotion or soil nutrients uptake.^1–5 Recently, biology and function of fungal endophytes in nature has been extensively reviewed,⁶ and these have been grouped into four classes according to their differential interactions with host plants, which may range from mere neutralism to an active mutualism.Exploitation of beneficial properties of endophytes is of great relevance at an applied level, either to increase production yields of agricultural crops, control of plant diseases or pests, adapt plants to unsuitable growth conditions, or in reforestation activities. In this sense, we aim to exploit the endophytic capacities of selected fungi from two independent approaches: through the use of natural endophytes, which have shown to confer benefits to their host plants,⁵ or via a putative endophytic colonization of plant tissues by fungi with desirable properties. The latter strategy has been already introduced for several biological control agents such as nematophagous fungi colonizing roots,⁷ or entomopathogenic fungi in above-ground organs.^8,9 As representatives of each category, we selected two fungal species according to their endophytic capacities and antagonism to root pathogens.^10,11 First, Fusarium equiseti represents naturally occurring endophytes from natural vegetation growing under saline stress conditions.¹² The second, Pochonia chlamydosporia, is a nematode egg-parasite which behaves as a putative endophyte of roots.¹³ Both species have promising properties for application as biocontrol agents of either fungal and/or nematode plant parasites. The achievement of these objectives will depend on an exhaustive knowledge on the endophytic behavior and interactions with the host and other existing microbes, which starts with the assessment of the establishment of fungal populations within plant organs (e.g., roots). In many instances this is a complicated task. Fungal growth is characterized by an implicit irregular development due to the filamentous nature of mycelia, whose complexity increases in structured substrates, such as the interior of plant tissues.These difficulties are enhanced due to uneven distribution of nuclei (from zero to several thousands per cell), physiological activity or vitality of hyphae, and influence of competition among species.¹⁴ As a consequence of this, methods applied traditionally to estimate fungal occurrence within plant tissues (e.g., direct visualization, plating on culture media or immunolocalization^4,15,16) are biased or rather laborious and time consuming. Although applications of molecular methods have been directed to settle these problems, these may also present other weaknesses. Combination of quantitative and qualitative data achieved by both molecular and microscopy methods is probably the best choice to monitor fungi in plant roots, since the advantages of each technique may complement the drawbacks of the other.^14,17We recently optimized and applied both real-time PCR and microscopy techniques to exhaustively study the endophytic development of F. equiseti and P. chlamydosporia in barley roots.¹⁸ The first approach consisted in a specific quantification of nucleic acids from either fungus in roots using Molecular beacon probes.¹⁹ This allows an accurate monitoring of the respective amplicon generation over PCR cyclings, which can be correlated with the amount of fungal biomass.²⁰ Fungal populations detected in roots were statistically similar for both fungal species studied, with an overall colonization of roots which ranged from ca. 5 to 11 ng of fungal target DNA per 100 ng of total DNA. The endophytic proportion of these populations (assessed by surface sterilization of roots prior to DNA extraction) was represented by values between ca. 0.5 to 1 ng of fungal target DNA per 100 ng of total DNA.These quantitative data resulted in an increased sensitivity and dynamic range as compared with traditional culturing methods. Nevertheless, though quantification yielded good results under a gnotobiotic system, where only those fungi of interest are present within plant tissues, implementation for non-axenic semi-field or field experimentation should include modifications. These should cover corrections for presence of other colonizing microorganisms under non-axenic growth conditions-which may contribute to the amount of total DNA extracted from roots-, or variability on DNA extraction yields among samples.²¹ Inclusion of internal standards such as the simultaneous detection of fungal and host plant in a single reaction tube²² would settle these interferences. Multiplex PCR amplification of respective plant or fungal loci would permit detection of differential fluorescent signals emitted by Molecular beacons specific for either target DNA. We are currently optimizing primers and probes designed in Maciá-Vicente et al.¹⁸ for multiplexing with primers and Molecular beacons specific for the host (barley) ubiquitin gene (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Amplification by conventional PCR of DNA from plant (h; barley), endophyte (e; P. chlamydosporia), or endophyte-colonized plants (h + e). For this, single locus detection with primers specific for the fungal alkaline serine protease p1,¹⁸ (Fp) and the plant ubiquitin (Pp) is shown, and multiplex PCR using both primer pairs (Fp + Pp) for one-tube simultaneous detection.In addition to real-time PCR assays, endophytic behavior of F. equiseti and P. chlamydosporia was assessed using live-cell microscopy. Aiming to develop techniques for further studies in semi-field experiments, we generated genetically transformed isolates for both F. equiseti and P. chlamydosporia, with constitutive expression of the fluorescent reporter protein GFP. For this purpose an Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated protocol was applied due to its efficiency in fungal transformation.²³ Observation of barley roots inoculated with GFP-tagged isolates under laser scanning confocal microscopy permitted a time-course qualitative monitoring of the infection processes by F. equiseti and P. chlamydosporia, which displayed different endophytic patterns. Loading studies with the endocytotic tracker FM4-64 allowed a discrimination of new traits of fungal colonization of roots. Fungal hyphae appeared tightly fitted in a plant membrane-derived sheath during the first invasive stages, in a similar manner to that which occurs during pathogenesis,²⁴ but also in mutualistic interactions,²⁵ indicating it may be (at least originarly) an unspecific barrier to fungal invasion. However, this membrane was lost with time, as a consequence of hyphal aggressiveness over plant cell infection.Differential wavelength emission between GFP and FM4-64 also allowed detection of a heterogeneous distribution of viable and non-viable hyphae within the root cortex, the latter linked to plant defense responses such as abundant production of papillae or vacuoles. This colonization pattern suggests that endophytic interaction established by both fungi is a “push and pull” balance between hyphal growth and the capacity of the plant to get rid of the invader. Yet we do not know whether remaining undegraded nucleic acids contents of within-cortex dead hyphae may contribute to fungal target DNA detection by real-time PCR. Although this fact may represent a bias for endophytes quantification, combination with microscopical analyses complements the information achieved.We are currently investigating practical and theoretical aspects of the root inoculation of fungi with endophytic capabilities and antagonistic potential to root pathogens (fungi and nematodes). This research also includes evaluating root colonization abilities for different host plants, both monocots and eudicots. As an example, root colonization efficiency by P. chlamydosporia dramatically changes between barley and tomato. In the latter, hyphae within roots are sparse and restricted to epidermal root cells,¹³ with no evident connection between infected cells (Fig. 2A). In spite of this restricted distribution, fungal chlamydospores (the propagules usually found in P. chlamydosporia-harboring soils) may be frequently found on the root surface. Their viability (according to GFP expression in the cytoplasm), irrespective of that of surrounding hyphae (Fig. 2B), could support that root colonization creates a stable source of inoculum to sustain the populations of the microorganism in the rhizospheric soil. Our final goal is to optimize biocontrol performance and crop growth promotion by endophytes under agricultural conditions.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Laser scanning confocal microscopy images of one-month-old tomato roots colonized by GFP-tagged P. chlamydosporia. (A) P. chlamydosporia hypha restricted to a single epidermal root cell. (B) Chlamydospore in the root surface. Note GFP fluorescence within cells (viable) in contrast to lack of fluorescence in peduncle (non-viable). Bars = 20 µm.     

Sublethal concentrations of salicylic acid decrease the formation of reactive oxygen species but maintain an increased nitric oxide production in the root apex of the ethylene-insensitive Never ripe tomato mutants

The pattern of salicylic acid (SA)-induced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) were different in the apex of adventitious roots in wild-type and in the ethylene-insensitive Never ripe (Nr) mutants of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv Ailsa Craig). ROS were upregulated, while NO remained at the control level in apical root tissues of wildtype plants exposed to sublethal concentrations of SA. In contrast, Nr plants expressing a defective ethylene receptor displayed a reduced level of ROS and a higher NO content in the apical root cells. In wild-type plants NO production seems to be ROS(H₂O₂)-dependent at cell death-inducing concentrations of SA, indicating that ROS and NO may interact to trigger oxidative cell death. In the absence of significant ROS accumulation, the increased NO production caused moderate reduction in cell viability in root apex of Nr plants exposed to 10⁻³ M SA. This suggests that a functional ethylene signaling pathway is necessary for the control of ROS and NO production induced by SA.Key words: ethylene receptor mutant, never ripe, nitric oxide, reactive oxygen species, root apex, salicylic acid, tomatoSeveral signal molecules, including salicylic acid (SA) have been implicated in the response of plants to biotic^1–3 and abiotic stressors.^4–6 SA was identified as a central regulator of local defense against (hemi)biotophic pathogens inducing a hypersensitive response (HR), which is characterized by the development of lesions that restrict pathogen spread. It has also emerged as a possible signaling component involved in the activation of certain plant defense responses in non-infected part of the plants establishing the systemic acquired resistance (SAR).⁷The SA-induced biotic and abiotic stress adaptation most likely involves reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) in primary signaling events that activate multiple signal transduction pathways. SA-induced ROS is required for the activation of antioxidant defense mechanisms⁴ and if the generation of ROS exceeds the capacity of antioxidant systems, the cells die.⁸ NO is another important player that is required for the induction of defense mechanisms⁹ or for ROS-induced cell death.¹⁰Accumulation of SA, and two other plant hormones, ethylene (ET) and jasmonic acid (JA) are intimately associated with the initiation or spread of cell death. In HR SA and ROS have been proposed to be on a positive feedback loop that amplifies signals and leads to programmed cell death (PCD). Ethylene caused increased spreading of cell death, while lesion containment can be achieved by JA through decreasing the sensitivity of the cells to ethylene and through the suppression of SA biosynthesis and signaling.⁸Ethylene evolution is associated with diverse physiological processes such as leaf and flower senescence, abscission of organs and fruit ripening.¹¹ The biosynthesis of ethylene is stimulated by a variety of abiotic and biotic stress factors. Ethylene overproducing mutants (eto1 and eto3) of Arabidopsis were found to be more sensitive to O₃, an abiotic stressor which induces ROS-dependent cell death.¹² Cadmium-induced cell death was also accompanied by increased production of ethylene and simultaneously by H₂O₂ accumulation in tomato cell suspension, and based on the effect of specific inhibitors of ethylene biosynthesis and action the authors concluded that the cell death process required H₂O₂ production and a functional ethylene signaling pathway.¹³ Ethylene signaling is also required for the susceptible disease response of tomato plants infected with Xanthomonas campestris pv vesicatoria.¹⁴ It was found that the accumulation of SA and increased production of ethylene were important components of the disease symptoms of this pathogen in wild-type plants, while in Never ripe (Nr) mutants, which have a non-functional ethylene receptor, the infected plants failed to accumulate SA, produced less ethylene, and the leaves exhibited reduced necrotic lesions.It has been also shown that SA enhances NO synthesis in a dose-dependent manner.¹⁵ ROS, such as ^·O₂⁻ and H₂O₂ as well as NO can act together in the cell death regulation and propagation.^8,16 The compartment-specific (down)regulation of ROS can be controlled by NO, accordingly, ROS and NO homeostasis may be essential for the induction or for the avoidance of cell death.