PCNA trimer instability inhibits translesion synthesis by DNA polymerase η and by DNA polymerase δ

Translesion synthesis (TLS), the process by which DNA polymerases replicate through DNA lesions, is the source of most DNA damage-induced mutations. Sometimes TLS is carried out by replicative polymerases that have evolved to synthesize DNA on non-damaged templates. Most of the time, however, TLS is carried out by specialized translesion polymerases that have evolved to synthesize DNA on damaged templates. TLS requires the mono-ubiquitylation of the replication accessory factor proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). PCNA and ubiquitin-modified PCNA (UbPCNA) stimulate TLS by replicative and translesion polymerases. Two mutant forms of PCNA, one with an E113G substitution and one with a G178S substitution, support normal cell growth but inhibit TLS thereby reducing mutagenesis in yeast. A re-examination of the structures of both mutant PCNA proteins revealed substantial disruptions of the subunit interface that forms the PCNA trimer. Both mutant proteins have reduced trimer stability with the G178S substitution causing a more severe defect. The mutant forms of PCNA and UbPCNA do not stimulate TLS of an abasic site by either replicative Pol δ or translesion Pol η. Normal replication by Pol η was also impacted, but normal replication by Pol δ was much less affected. These findings support a model in which reduced trimer stability causes these mutant PCNA proteins to occasionally undergo conformational changes that compromise their ability to stimulate TLS by both replicative and translesion polymerases.     

Interaction between DNA Polymerase λ and Anticancer Nucleoside Analogs

The anticancer activity of cytarabine (AraC) and gemcitabine (dFdC) is thought to result from chain termination after incorporation into DNA. To investigate their incorporation into DNA at atomic level resolution, we present crystal structures of human DNA polymerase λ (Pol λ) bound to gapped DNA and containing either AraC or dFdC paired opposite template dG. These structures reveal that AraC and dFdC can bind within the nascent base pair binding pocket of Pol λ. Although the conformation of the ribose of AraCTP is similar to that of normal dCTP, the conformation of dFdCTP is significantly different. Consistent with these structures, Pol λ efficiently incorporates AraCTP but not dFdCTP. The data are consistent with the possibility that Pol λ could modulate the cytotoxic effect of AraC.     

The processivity factor β controls DNA polymerase IV traffic during spontaneous mutagenesis and translesion synthesis in vivo

The dinB-encoded DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) belongs to the recently identified Y-family of DNA polymerases. Like other members of this family, Pol IV is involved in translesion synthesis and mutagenesis. Here, we show that the C-terminal five amino acids of Pol IV are essential in targeting it to the β-clamp, the processivity factor of the replicative DNA polymerase (Pol III) of Escherichia coli. In vivo, the disruption of this interaction obliterates the function of Pol IV in both spontaneous and induced mutagenesis. These results point to the pivotal role of the processivity clamp during DNA polymerase trafficking in the vicinity of damaged-template DNA.     

Structural basis of ubiquitin recognition by translesion synthesis DNA polymerase ι

Cells have evolved mutagenic bypass mechanisms that prevent stalling of the replication machinery at DNA lesions. This process, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), involves switching from high-fidelity DNA polymerases to specialized DNA polymerases that replicate through a variety of DNA lesions. In eukaryotes, polymerase switching during TLS is regulated by the DNA damage-triggered monoubiquitylation of PCNA. How the switch operates is unknown, but all TLS polymerases of the so-called Y-family possess PCNA and ubiquitin-binding domains that are important for their function. To gain insight into the structural mechanisms underlying the regulation of TLS by ubiquitylation, we have probed the interaction of ubiquitin with a conserved ubiquitin-binding motif (UBM2) of Y-family polymerase Polι. Using NMR spectroscopy, we have determined the structure of a complex of human Polι UBM2 and ubiquitin, revealing a novel ubiquitin recognition fold consisting of two α-helices separated by a central trans-proline residue conserved in all UBMs. We show that, different from the majority of ubiquitin complexes characterized to date, ubiquitin residue Ile44 only plays a modest role in the association of ubiquitin with Polι UBM2. Instead, binding of UBM2 is centered on the recognition of Leu8 in ubiquitin, which is essential for the interaction.     

DNA polymerase ι of mammals as a participant in translesion synthesis of DNA

This review describes the properties of some specialized DNA polymerases participating in translesion synthesis of DNA. Special attention is given to these properties in vivo. DNA polymerase iota (Polι) of mammals has very unusual features and is extremely error-prone. Based on available data, a hypothesis is proposed explaining how mammalian cells can explore the unusual features of DNA Polι to bypass DNA damages and to simultaneously prevent its mutagenic potential.     

Efficiency and fidelity of human DNA polymerases λ and β during gap-filling DNA synthesis

The base excision repair (BER) pathway coordinates the replacement of 1-10 nucleotides at sites of single-base lesions. This process generates DNA substrates with various gap sizes which can alter the catalytic efficiency and fidelity of a DNA polymerase during gap-filling DNA synthesis. Here, we quantitatively determined the substrate specificity and base substitution fidelity of human DNA polymerase λ (Pol λ), an enzyme proposed to support the known BER DNA polymerase β (Pol β), as it filled 1-10-nucleotide gaps at 1-nucleotide intervals. Pol λ incorporated a correct nucleotide with relatively high efficiency until the gap size exceeded 9 nucleotides. Unlike Pol λ, Pol β did not have an absolute threshold on gap size as the catalytic efficiency for a correct dNTP gradually decreased as the gap size increased from 2 to 10 nucleotides and then recovered for non-gapped DNA. Surprisingly, an increase in gap size resulted in lower polymerase fidelity for Pol λ, and this downregulation of fidelity was controlled by its non-enzymatic N-terminal domains. Overall, Pol λ was up to 160-fold more error-prone than Pol β, thereby suggesting Pol λ would be more mutagenic during long gap-filling DNA synthesis. In addition, dCTP was the preferred misincorporation for Pol λ and its N-terminal domain truncation mutants. This nucleotide preference was shown to be dependent upon the identity of the adjacent 5'-template base. Our results suggested that both Pol λ and Pol β would catalyze nucleotide incorporation with the highest combination of efficiency and accuracy when the DNA substrate contains a single-nucleotide gap. Thus, Pol λ, like Pol β, is better suited to catalyze gap-filling DNA synthesis during short-patch BER in vivo, although, Pol λ may play a role in long-patch BER.     

In vivo evidence for translesion synthesis by the replicative DNA polymerase δ

The intolerance of DNA polymerase δ (Polδ) to incorrect base pairing contributes to its extremely high accuracy during replication, but is believed to inhibit translesion synthesis (TLS). However, chicken DT40 cells lacking the POLD3 subunit of Polδ are deficient in TLS. Previous genetic and biochemical analysis showed that POLD3 may promote lesion bypass by Polδ itself independently of the translesion polymerase Polζ of which POLD3 is also a subunit. To test this hypothesis, we have inactivated Polδ proofreading in pold3 cells. This significantly restored TLS in pold3 mutants, enhancing dA incorporation opposite abasic sites. Purified proofreading-deficient human Polδ holoenzyme performs TLS of abasic sites in vitro much more efficiently than the wild type enzyme, with over 90% of TLS events resulting in dA incorporation. Furthermore, proofreading deficiency enhances the capability of Polδ to continue DNA synthesis over UV lesions both in vivo and in vitro. These data support Polδ contributing to TLS in vivo and suggest that the mutagenesis resulting from loss of Polδ proofreading activity may in part be explained by enhanced lesion bypass.     

Quantifying the energetic contributions of desolvation and π-electron density during translesion DNA synthesis

This report examines the molecular mechanism by which high-fidelity DNA polymerases select nucleotides during the replication of an abasic site, a non-instructional DNA lesion. This was accomplished by synthesizing several unique 5-substituted indolyl 2'-deoxyribose triphosphates and defining their kinetic parameters for incorporation opposite an abasic site to interrogate the contributions of π-electron density and solvation energies. In general, the K(d, app) values for hydrophobic non-natural nucleotides are ～10-fold lower than those measured for isosteric hydrophilic analogs. In addition, k(pol) values for nucleotides that contain less π-electron densities are slower than isosteric analogs possessing higher degrees of π-electron density. The differences in kinetic parameters were used to quantify the energetic contributions of desolvation and π-electron density on nucleotide binding and polymerization rate constant. We demonstrate that analogs lacking hydrogen-bonding capabilities act as chain terminators of translesion DNA replication while analogs with hydrogen bonding functional groups are extended when paired opposite an abasic site. Collectively, the data indicate that the efficiency of nucleotide incorporation opposite an abasic site is controlled by energies associated with nucleobase desolvation and π-electron stacking interactions whereas elongation beyond the lesion is achieved through a combination of base-stacking and hydrogen-bonding interactions.     

Trading places: how do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis?

The replicative bypass of base damage in DNA (translesion DNA synthesis [TLS]) is a ubiquitous mechanism for relieving arrested DNA replication. The process requires multiple polymerase switching events during which the high-fidelity DNA polymerase in the replication machinery arrested at the primer terminus is replaced by one or more polymerases that are specialized for TLS. When replicative bypass is fully completed, the primer terminus is once again occupied by high-fidelity polymerases in the replicative machinery. This review addresses recent advances in our understanding of DNA polymerase switching during TLS in bacteria such as E. coli and in lower and higher eukaryotes.     

The in vitro fidelity of yeast DNA polymerase δ and polymerase ε holoenzymes during dinucleotide microsatellite DNA synthesis

Elucidating the sources of genetic variation within microsatellite alleles has important implications for understanding the etiology of human diseases. Mismatch repair is a well described pathway for the suppression of microsatellite instability. However, the cellular polymerases responsible for generating microsatellite errors have not been fully described. We address this gap in knowledge by measuring the fidelity of recombinant yeast polymerase δ (Pol δ) and ? (Pol ?) holoenzymes during synthesis of a [GT/CA] microsatellite. The in vitro HSV-tk forward assay was used to measure DNA polymerase errors generated during gap-filling of complementary GT(10) and CA(10)-containing substrates and ～90 nucleotides of HSV-tk coding sequence surrounding the microsatellites. The observed mutant frequencies within the microsatellites were 4 to 30-fold higher than the observed mutant frequencies within the coding sequence. More specifically, the rate of Pol δ and Pol ? misalignment-based insertion/deletion errors within the microsatellites was ～1000-fold higher than the rate of insertion/deletion errors within the HSV-tk gene. Although the most common microsatellite error was the deletion of a single repeat unit, ～ 20% of errors were deletions of two or more units for both polymerases. The differences in fidelity for wild type enzymes and their exonuclease-deficient derivatives were ～2-fold for unit-based microsatellite insertion/deletion errors. Interestingly, the exonucleases preferentially removed potentially stabilizing interruption errors within the microsatellites. Since Pol δ and Pol ? perform not only the bulk of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells but also are implicated in performing DNA synthesis associated with repair and recombination, these results indicate that microsatellite errors may be introduced into the genome during multiple DNA metabolic pathways.     

Switching between polymerase and exonuclease sites in DNA polymerase ε

The balance between exonuclease and polymerase activities promotes DNA synthesis over degradation when nucleotides are correctly added to the new strand by replicative B-family polymerases. Misincorporations shift the balance toward the exonuclease site, and the balance tips back in favor of DNA synthesis when the incorrect nucleotides have been removed. Most B-family DNA polymerases have an extended β-hairpin loop that appears to be important for switching from the exonuclease site to the polymerase site, a process that affects fidelity of the DNA polymerase. Here, we show that DNA polymerase ε can switch between the polymerase site and exonuclease site in a processive manner despite the absence of an extended β-hairpin loop. K967 and R988 are two conserved amino acids in the palm and thumb domain that interact with bases on the primer strand in the minor groove at positions n−2 and n−4/n−5, respectively. DNA polymerase ε depends on both K967 and R988 to stabilize the 3′-terminus of the DNA within the polymerase site and on R988 to processively switch between the exonuclease and polymerase sites. Based on a structural alignment with DNA polymerase δ, we propose that arginines corresponding to R988 might have a similar function in other B-family polymerases.     

A role for PCNA2 in translesion synthesis by Arabidopsis thaliana DNA polymerase η

Eukaryotic DNA polymerase η (Polη) confers ultraviolet (UV) resistance by catalyzing translesion synthesis (TLS) past UV photoproducts. Polη has been studied extensively in budding yeast and mammalian cells, where its interaction with monoubiquitylated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is necessary for its biological activity. Recently, in collaboration with other investigators, our laboratory demonstrated that Arabidopsis thaliana Polη is required for UV resistance in plants. Furthermore, the purified enzyme can perform TLS opposite a cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer and interacts with PCNA. Intriguingly, the biological activity of Polη in a heterologous yeast assay depends on co-expression with Arabidopsis PCNA2 and Polη sequences implicated in binding PCNA or ubiquitin. We suggest that interaction of Arabidopsis Polη with ubiquitylated PCNA2 is required for TLS past UV photoproducts by Polη.Key words: polymerase η, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, translesion synthesis, ubiquitin, Arabidopsis thaliana, ultraviolet radiationUltraviolet (UV)-induced pyrimidine dimers can block the progression of DNA replication forks potentially disrupting the replication machinery and resulting in cell death. For this reason, cells have evolved non-essential, low fidelity DNA polymerases (Pols) capable of copying damaged templates,^1,2 a process termed translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). In budding yeast, TLS past UV photoproducts is catalyzed by Polη and Polζ (composed of the Rev3 catalytic and Rev7 accessory subunits), but also involves the Rev1 protein in an as yet undetermined role linked to Polζ.^1,3,4 Yeast and human Polη replicates cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), in particular thymine-thymine (TT) CPDs, in a relatively error-free manner whereas Polζ is essential for UV mutagenesis implicating it in error-prone TLS.^1,4,5Both UV resistance due to TLS and the polymerases responsible have been well-studied in yeast and mammalian cells over the past decade. Only more recently has evidence emerged that TLS may also contribute to UV resistance in plants. Arabidopsis thaliana POLH, REV1, REV3 and REV7 encode homologs of Polη, Rev1, Rev3 and Rev7, respectively.^6–10 T-DNA insertions in POLH, REV1 or REV3 sensitise root growth to acute UV doses,^6–8,10 and these mutations, as well as inactivation of REV7, increase the sensitivity of whole plants to longer term UV treatment.^6,8 Interestingly, polh rev3 double mutants show an additive increase in UV sensitivity over that observed for polh and rev3 single mutants,^6,10 potentially pointing to differences in the UV photoproducts bypassed by the two polymerases. That the enhanced UV sensitivity of the mutants may reflect a TLS deficiency is suggested by the finding that purified Arabidopsis Polη catalyzes primer extension and TLS past a TT CPD in vitro.⁶For TLS to occur, Polη must gain access to the replication machinery arrested at a UV photoproduct. It does so in yeast and mammalian cells by interacting with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), the eukaryotic sliding clamp required for processive DNA replication.^1,3,11, DNA damage or stalling of the replicative polymerase triggers monoubiquitylation of PCNA at lysine 164 by a complex of the E2 ubiquitin conjugase Rad6 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Rad18.^1,3,11,12 This modification increases the affinity of Polη for PCNA, with which it interacts via a single PCNA interacting peptide (PIP) box and a single ubiquitin-binding zinc finger (UBZ) domain.^1,3In contrast to its yeast and mammalian counterparts, Polη from Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa (rice) has two PIP boxes and lacks a UBZ.^6,9,10 Instead the two polymerases each possess two ubiquitin-binding motifs (UBMs) similar to those present in the Arabidopsis Rev1 protein and a vertebrate TLS polymerase, Pol., for which there is no homolog in Arabidopsis.^6,13 Considerable differences in the sequences flanking the UBMs in Polη and Rev1 argue that Polη did not acquire its UBMs from Rev1, and so, although perhaps unique to plant Polη, their origin remains a mystery.The presence of PCNA- and ubiquitin-binding sequences in plant Polη hint that it may operate in TLS in a manner similar to that for Polη from yeast or mammalian cells. Indeed, three lines of evidence⁶ lead us to suggest that the Polη PIP boxes and UBMs likely function in binding ubiquitylated PCNA and this interaction is probably required for TLS past UV photoproducts by Arabidopsis Polη. First, Arabidopsis Polη interacts physically and in yeast two-hybrid assays with Arabidopsis PCNA1 and PCNA2. Second, expression in yeast of Arabidopsis cDNAs encoding Polη and PCNA2, but not PCNA1, fully complements the UV sensitivity conferred by elimination of yeast Polη. In vitro mutagenesis suggests the inability of Polη plus PCNA1 to restore UV resistance is due to a lysine at position 201 in PCNA1 but not PCNA2. In the three-dimensional structure of PCNA, amino acid 201 lies adjacent to lysine-164, the residue that is ubiquitylated in yeast and human PCNA. Thus, one possibility is that lysine-201 in PCNA1 prevents complementation of UV sensitivity by inhibiting ubiquitylation of lysine-164. Third, altering presumed critical residues in either of the two PIP boxes or UBM2 in Arabidopsis Polη also prevents restoration of UV resistance in Polη-deficient yeast cells.Several important parts of the puzzle remain to be solved. In particular, the ubiquitylation of plant PCNA has yet to be demonstrated, and the identity of the proteins that might monoubiquitylate plant PCNA is uncertain. Although Arabidopsis Rad6 homologs can ubiquitylate target proteins in vitro, there is no evidence that Arabidopsis PCNA1 or PCNA2 is a substrate, and Arabidopsis lacks a Rad18 homolog.^14,15 Finally, if PCNA is ubiquitylated in planta, does this occur at lysine-164 in response to DNA damage or replication fork stalling, is the interaction of Polη with PCNA stimulated by this modification, and is an enhanced interaction mediated by the Polη UBMs?     

A novel ubiquitin binding mode in the S. cerevisiae translesion synthesis DNA polymerase η

The ubiquitin binding zinc finger (UBZ) domain in the C-terminal portion of Polη has been found to interact with ubiquitin. However, the affinity between the Polη UBZ and ubiquitin was shown to be low with a previously reported K(d) of 73-81 μM. This low-affinity binding between Polη UBZ and ubiquitin has been difficult to reconcile with its presumed role in translesion synthesis as suggested by genetic and cell biology studies. In this work, we constructed a minimal S. cerevisiae Polη UBZ domain and probed the Polη UBZ-ubiquitin interaction using a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) technique. Our quantitative binding data between the wild-type or mutant Polη UBZ and ubiquitin revealed an interesting divergence between the Polη UBZ from S. cerevisiae and humans. Moreover, we found that the C-terminal portion of yeast Polη (amino acid 515-632) binds ubiquitin with a much higher affinity than the minimal UBZ domain. Further, distinct ubiquitin-binding kinetics were observed for the C-terminal portion of Polη and the isolated UBZ domain. This observation raised the interesting possibility that the Polη C-terminal portion binds ubiquitin in a novel mode that affords higher affinity. Our findings have broader implication in understanding the generally weak interaction between the known ubiquitin-binding domains and ubiquitin.     

Interaction between DNA Polymerase β and BRCA1

The breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) protein is a tumor suppressor playing roles in DNA repair and cell cycle regulation. Studies of DNA repair functions of BRCA1 have focused on double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways and have recently included base excision repair (BER). However, the function of BRCA1 in BER is not well defined. Here, we examined a BRCA1 role in BER, first in relation to alkylating agent (MMS) treatment of cells and the BER enzyme DNA polymerase β (pol β). MMS treatment of BRCA1 negative human ovarian and chicken DT40 cells revealed hypersensitivity, and the combined gene deletion of BRCA1 and pol β in DT40 cells was consistent with these factors acting in the same repair pathway, possibly BER. Using cell extracts and purified proteins, BRCA1 and pol β were found to interact in immunoprecipitation assays, yet in vivo and in vitro assays for a BER role of BRCA1 were negative. An alternate approach with the human cells of immunofluorescence imaging and laser-induced DNA damage revealed negligible BRCA1 recruitment during the first 60 s after irradiation, the period typical of recruitment of pol β and other BER factors. Instead, 15 min after irradiation, BRCA1 recruitment was strong and there was γ-H2AX co-localization, consistent with DSBs and repair. The rapid recruitment of pol β was similar in BRCA1 positive and negative cells. However, a fraction of pol β initially recruited remained associated with damage sites much longer in BRCA1 positive than negative cells. Interestingly, pol β expression was required for BRCA1 recruitment, suggesting a partnership between these repair factors in DSB repair.     

Promiscuous DNA synthesis by human DNA polymerase θ

The biological role of human DNA polymerase θ (POLQ) is not yet clearly defined, but it has been proposed to participate in several cellular processes based on its translesion synthesis capabilities. POLQ is a low-fidelity polymerase capable of efficient bypass of blocking lesions such as abasic sites and thymine glycols as well as extension of mismatched primer termini. Here, we show that POLQ possesses a DNA polymerase activity that appears to be template independent and allows efficient extension of single-stranded DNA as well as duplex DNA with either protruding or multiply mismatched 3'-OH termini. We hypothesize that this DNA synthesis activity is related to the proposed role for POLQ in the repair or tolerance of double-strand breaks.     

How are specialized (low-fidelity) eukaryotic polymerases selected and switched with high-fidelity polymerases during translesion DNA synthesis?

Specialized DNA polymerases are required in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells for bypassing sites of template DNA damage that arrest high-fidelity DNA replication. Recent studies in the literature provide hints of the complexity of DNA switching between polymerases for translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) and those for normal DNA replication.     

Interaction of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase with DNA polymerase α

Homogeneously purified poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) specifically stimulated the activity of immunoaffinity-purified calf or human DNA polymerase by about 6 to 60-fold. Apparently, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of DNA polymerase was not necessary for the stimulation. The effects of PARP on DNA polymerase were biphasic: at very low concentrations of DNA, it rather inhibited its activity, whereas, at higher DNA concentrations, PARP greatly stimulated it. The autopoly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of PARP suppressed both its stimulatory and inhibitory effects. By immunoprecipitation with an anti-DNA polymerase antibody, it was clearly shown that PARP may be physically associated with DNA polymerase . Stimulation of DNA polymerase may be attributed to the physical association between the two, rather than to the DNA-binding capacity of PARP, since the PARP fragment containing only the DNA binding domain showed little stimulatory activity. The existence of PARP-DNA polymerase complexes were also detected in crude extracts of calf thymus.     

Human DNA polymerase λ catalyzes lesion bypass across benzo[a]pyrene-derived DNA adduct during base excision repair

The combined action of oxidative stress and genotoxic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons derivatives can lead to cluster-type DNA damage that includes both a modified nucleotide and a bulky lesion. As an example, we investigated the possibility of repair of an AP site located opposite a minor groove-positioned (+)-trans-BPDE-dG or a base-displaced intercalated (+)-cis-BPDE-dG adduct (BP lesion) by a BER system. Oligonucleotides with single uracil residues in certain positions were annealed with complementary oligonucleotides bearing either a cis- or trans-BP adduct. The resulting DNA duplexes contained dU either directly opposite the modified dG or shifted to adjacent 5' (-1) or 3' (+1) positions. Digestion with uracil DNA glycosylase was utilized to generate AP sites which were then hydrolyzed by APE1, and the resulting gaps were processed by DNA polymerase β (Polβ) or λ (Polλ). The AP sites in position -1 can be repaired effectively using APE1 and Polβ or Polλ. The AP sites opposite the BP lesions can be repaired using Polλ in the case of cis- but not the trans-isomeric adduct. The AP sites in position +1 are the most difficult to repair. In the case of the AP site located in position +1, the activity of Polλ does not depend on the stereoisomeric properties of the BP lesions and dCTP is the preferred inserted substrate in both cases. The capability of Polλ to introduce the correct dNTP opposite the cis-BP-dG adduct in gap filling reactions suggests that this polymerase may play a specialized role in the process of repair of these kinds of lesions.     

A novel interaction between human DNA polymerase η and MutLα

Human DNA polymerase η (Polη) is the gene product underlying xeroderma pigmentosum variant, and plays principal roles in translesion DNA synthesis. Here, we identified human MLH1, an essential component of mismatch repair (MMR), as a Polη-interacting protein. The middle area residues, which include the little finger domain, of Polη are important for the interaction with MLH1. Polη also interacts with the MLH1/PMS2 heterodimer (MutLα). Co-immunoprecipitation analyses revealed that MutLα, and also MSH2 and MSH6, components of the MutSα heterodimer, form complexes with Polη in human cells. Although MutSα had been reported to interact with C-terminal residues of Polη, MutLα and MutSα co-precipitated with C-terminally truncated Polη, suggesting that MutSα can interact with Polη through MutLα. MMR proteins were more abundant in the Polη complex on the chromatin of S phase-synchronized cells than of asynchronous cells, suggesting that the interaction between Polη and MLH1 is involved in DNA replication.