Development of selective agonists and antagonists of P2Y receptors

Although elucidation of the medicinal chemistry of agonists and antagonists of the P2Y receptors has lagged behind that of many other members of group A G protein-coupled receptors, detailed qualitative and quantitative structure–activity relationships (SARs) were recently constructed for several of the subtypes. Agonists selective for P2Y₁, P2Y₂, and P2Y₆ receptors and nucleotide antagonists selective for P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂ receptors are now known. Selective nonnucleotide antagonists were reported for P2Y₁, P2Y₂, P2Y₆, P2Y₁₁, P2Y₁₂, and P2Y₁₃ receptors. At the P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂ receptors, nucleotide agonists (5′-diphosphate derivatives) were converted into antagonists of nanomolar affinity by altering the phosphate moieties, with a focus particularly on the ribose conformation and substitution pattern. Nucleotide analogues with conformationally constrained ribose-like rings were introduced as selective receptor probes for P2Y₁ and P2Y₆ receptors. Screening chemically diverse compound libraries has begun to yield new lead compounds for the development of P2Y receptor antagonists, such as competitive P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists with antithrombotic activity. Selective agonists for the P2Y₄, P2Y₁₁, and P2Y₁₃ receptors and selective antagonists for P2Y₄ and P2Y₁₄ receptors have not yet been identified. The P2Y₁₄ receptor appears to be the most restrictive of the class with respect to modification of the nucleobase, ribose, and phosphate moieties. The continuing process of ligand design for the P2Y receptors will aid in the identification of new clinical targets.     

Pharmacochemistry of the platelet purinergic receptors

Platelets contain at least five purinergic G protein-coupled receptors, e.g., the pro-aggregatory P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂ receptors, a P2Y₁₄ receptor (GPR105) of unknown function, and anti-aggregatory A_2A and A_2B adenosine receptor (ARs), in addition to the ligand-gated P2X1 ion channel. Probing the structure–activity relationships (SARs) of the P2X and P2Y receptors for extracellular nucleotides has resulted in numerous new agonist and antagonist ligands. Selective agents derived from known ligands and novel chemotypes can be used to help define the subtypes pharmacologically. Some of these agents have entered into clinical trials in spite of the challenges of drug development for these classes of receptors. The functional architecture of P2 receptors was extensively explored using mutagenesis and molecular modeling, which are useful tools in drug discovery. In general, novel drug delivery methods, prodrug approaches, allosteric modulation, and biased agonism would be desirable to overcome side effects that tend to occur even with receptor subtype-selective ligands. Detailed SAR analyses have been constructed for nucleotide and non-nucleotide ligands at the P2Y₁, P2Y₁₂, and P2Y₁₄ receptors. The thienopyridine antithrombotic drugs Clopidogrel and Prasugrel require enzymatic pre-activation in vivo and react irreversibly with the P2Y₁₂ receptor. There is much pharmaceutical development activity aimed at identifying reversible P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists. The screening of chemically diverse compound libraries has identified novel chemotypes that act as competitive, non-nucleotide antagonists of the P2Y₁ receptor or the P2Y₁₂ receptor, and antithrombotic properties of the structurally optimized analogues were demonstrated. In silico screening at the A_2A AR has identified antagonist molecules having novel chemotypes. Fluorescent and other reporter groups incorporated into ligands can enable new technology for receptor assays and imaging. The A_2A agonist CGS21680 and the P2Y₁ receptor antagonist MRS2500 were derivatized for covalent attachment to polyamidoamine dendrimeric carriers of MW 20,000, and the resulting multivalent conjugates inhibited ADP-promoted platelet aggregation. In conclusion, a wide range of new pharmacological tools is available to control platelet function by interacting with cell surface purine receptors.     

Ribose modified nucleosides and nucleotides as ligands for purine receptors

Molecular modeling of receptors for adenosine and nucleotide (P2) receptors with docked ligand, based on mutagenesis, was carried out. Adenosine 3',5'-bisphosphate derivatives act as selective P2Y1 antagonists/partial agonists. The ribose moiety was replaced with carbocyclics, smaller and larger rings, conformationally constrained rings, and acyclics, producing compounds that retained receptor affinity. Conformational constraints were built into the ribose rings of nucleoside and nucleotide ligands using the methanocarba approach, i.e. fused cyclopropane and cyclopentane rings in place of ribose, suggesting a preference for the Northern (N) conformation among ligands for P2Y1 and A1 and A3ARs.     

Nucleotide P2Y1 receptor agonists are in vitro and in vivo prodrugs of A1/A3 adenosine receptor agonists: implications for roles of P2Y1 and A1/A3 receptors in physiology and pathology

Rapid phosphoester hydrolysis of endogenous purine and pyrimidine nucleotides has challenged the characterization of the role of P2 receptors in physiology and pathology. Nucleotide phosphoester stabilization has been pursued on a number of medicinal chemistry fronts. We investigated the in vitro and in vivo stability and pharmacokinetics of prototypical nucleotide P2Y₁ receptor (P2Y₁R) agonists and antagonists. These included the riboside nucleotide agonist 2-methylthio-ADP and antagonist MRS2179, as well as agonist MRS2365 and antagonist MRS2500 containing constrained (N)-methanocarba rings, which were previously reported to form nucleotides that are more slowly hydrolyzed at the α-phosphoester compared with the ribosides. In vitro incubations in mouse and human plasma and blood demonstrated the rapid hydrolysis of these compounds to nucleoside metabolites. This metabolism was inhibited by EDTA to chelate divalent cations required by ectonucleotidases for nucleotide hydrolysis. This rapid hydrolysis was confirmed in vivo in mouse pharmacokinetic studies that demonstrate that MRS2365 is a prodrug of the nucleoside metabolite AST-004 (MRS4322). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the nucleoside metabolites of MRS2365 and 2-methylthio-ADP are adenosine receptor (AR) agonists, notably at A₃ and A₁ARs. In vivo efficacy of MRS2365 in murine models of traumatic brain injury and stroke can be attributed to AR activation by its nucleoside metabolite AST-004, rather than P2Y₁R activation. This research suggests the importance of reevaluation of previous in vitro and in vivo research of P2YRs and P2XRs as there is a potential that the pharmacology attributed to nucleotide agonists is due to AR activation by active nucleoside metabolites.

     

Functional interaction between purinergic receptors: effect of ligands for A2A and P2Y12 receptors on P2Y1 receptor function

A_2A adenosine receptor (A_2AR), P2Y₁ receptor (P2Y₁R) and P2Y₁₂ receptor (P2Y₁₂R) are predominantly expressed on human platelets. The individual role of each of these receptors in platelet aggregation has been actively reported. Previously, hetero-oligomerization between these three receptors has been shown to occur. Here, we show that Ca²⁺ signaling evoked by the P2Y₁R agonist, 2-methylthioladenosine 5’ diphosphate (2MeSADP) was significantly inhibited by the A_2AR antagonist (ZM241385 and SCH442416) and the P2Y₁₂R antagonist (ARC69931MX) using HEK293T cells expressing the three receptors. It was confirmed that inhibition of P2Y₁R signaling by A_2AR and P2Y₁₂R antagonists was indeed mediated through A_2AR and P2Y₁₂R using 1321N1 human astrocytoma cells which do not express P2Y receptors. We expect that intermolecular signal transduction and specific conformational changes occur among components of hetero-oligomers formed by these three receptors.     

Action of Nucleosides and Nucleotides at 7 Transmembrane-Spanning Receptors

Ribose ring-constrained nucleosides and nucleotides to act at cell-surface purine recesptors have been designed and synthesized. At the P2Y₁ nucleotide receptor and the A₃ adenosine receptor (AR) the North envelope conformation of ribose is highly preferred. We have applied mutagenesis and rhodopsin-based homology modeling to the study of purine receptors and used the structural insights gained to assist in the design of novel ligands. Two subgroups of P2Y receptors have been defined, containing different sets of cationic residues for coordinating the phosphate groups. Modeling/mutagenesis of adenosine receptors has focused on determinants of intrinsic efficacy in adenosine derivatives and on a conserved Trp residue (6.48) which is involved in the activation process. The clinical use of adenosine agonists as cytoprotective agents has been limited by the widespread occurrence of ARs, thus, leading to undesirable side effects of exogenously administered adenosine derivatives. In order to overcome the inherent nonselectivity of activating the native receptors, we have introduced the concept of neoceptors. By this strategy, intended for eventual use in gene therapy, the putative ligand binding site of a G protein-coupled receptor is reengineered for activation by synthetic agonists (neoligands) built to have a structural complementarity. Using a rational design process we have identified neoceptor-neoligand pairs which are pharmacologically orthogonal with respect to the native species.     

Ligand binding and activation of UTP-activated G protein-coupled P2Y2 and P2Y4 receptors elucidated by mutagenesis,pharmacological and computational studies

The nucleotide receptors P2Y₂ and P2Y₄ are the most closely related G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) of the P2Y receptor (P2YR) family. Both subtypes couple to G_q proteins and are activated by the pyrimidine nucleotide UTP, but only P2Y₂R is also activated by the purine nucleotide ATP. Agonists and antagonists of both receptor subtypes have potential as drugs e.g. for neurodegenerative and inflammatory diseases. So far, potent and selective, “drug-like” ligands for both receptors are scarce, but would be required for target validation and as lead structures for drug development. Structural information on the receptors is lacking since no X-ray structures or cryo-electron microscopy images are available. Thus, we performed receptor homology modeling and docking studies combined with mutagenesis experiments on both receptors to address the question how ligand binding selectivity for these closely related P2YR subtypes can be achieved. The orthosteric binding site of P2Y₂R appeared to be more spacious than that of P2Y₄R. Mutation of Y197 to alanine in P2Y₄R resulted in a gain of ATP sensitivity. Anthraquinone-derived antagonists are likely to bind to the orthosteric or an allosteric site depending on their substitution pattern and the nature of the orthosteric binding site of the respective P2YR subtype. These insights into the architecture of P2Y₂- and P2Y₄Rs and their interactions with structurally diverse agonists and antagonist provide a solid basis for the future design of potent and selective ligands.     

Alanine‐(87)‐threonine polymorphism impairs signaling and internalization of the human P2Y11 receptor,when co‐expressed with the P2Y1 receptor

The P2Y₁₁ nucleotide receptor detects high extracellular ATP concentrations. Mutations of the human P2RY₁₁ gene can play a role in brain autoimmune responses, and the P2Y₁₁ receptor alanine‐87‐threonine (A87T) polymorphism has been suggested to affect immune‐system functions. We investigated receptor functionality of the P2Y₁₁A87T mutant using HEK293 and 1321N1 astrocytoma cells. In HEK293 cells, the P2Y₁₁ receptor agonist 3′‐O‐(4‐benzoylbenzoyl)adenosine 5′‐triphosphate (BzATP) was completely inactive in evoking intracellular calcium release while the potency of ATP was reduced. ATP was also less potent in triggering cAMP generation. However, 1321N1 astrocytoma cells, which lack any endogenous P2Y₁ receptors, did not display a reduction. Only when 1321N1 cells were co‐transfected with P2Y₁₁A87T and P2Y₁ receptors, the calcium responses to the P2Y₁₁ receptor‐specific agonist BzATP were reduced. It is already known that P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₁ receptors interact. We thus conclude that the physiological impact of A87T mutation of the P2Y₁₁ receptor derives from detrimental effects on P2Y₁–P2Y₁₁ receptor interaction. We additionally investigated alanine‐87‐serine and alanine‐87‐tyrosine P2Y₁₁ receptor mutants. Both mutations rescue the response to BzATP in HEK293 cells, thus ruling out polarity of amino acid‐87 to be the molecular basis for altered receptor characteristics. We further found that the P2Y₁₁A87T receptor shows complete loss of nucleotide‐induced internalization in HEK293 cells. Thus, we demonstrate impaired signaling of the P2Y₁₁ A87T‐mutated receptors when co‐operating with P2Y₁ receptors.

     

Investigation of the functional expression of purine and pyrimidine receptors in porcine isolated pancreatic arteries

Receptors for purines and pyrimidines are expressed throughout the cardiovascular system. This study investigated their functional expression in porcine isolated pancreatic arteries. Pancreatic arteries (endothelium intact or denuded) were prepared for isometric tension recording and preconstricted with U46619, a thromboxane A₂ mimetic; adenosine-5′-diphosphate (ADP), uridine-5′-triphosphate (UTP) and MRS2768, a selective P2Y₂ agonist, were applied cumulatively, while adenosine-5′-triphosphate (ATP) and αβ-methylene-ATP (αβ-meATP) response curves were generated from single concentrations per tissue segment. Antagonists/enzyme inhibitors were applied prior to U46619 addition. ATP, αβ-meATP, UTP and MRS2768 induced vasoconstriction, with a potency order of αβ-meATP > MRS2768 > ATP ≥ UTP. Contractions to ATP and αβ-meATP were blocked by NF449, a selective P2X1 receptor antagonist. The contraction induced by ATP, but not UTP, was followed by vasorelaxation. Endothelium removal and DUP 697, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, had no significant effect on contraction to ATP but attenuated that to UTP, indicating actions at distinct receptors. MRS2578, a selective P2Y₆ receptor antagonist, had no effect on contractions to UTP. ADP induced endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation which was inhibited by MRS2179, a selective P2Y₁ receptor antagonist, or SCH58261, a selective adenosine A_2A receptor antagonist. The contractions to ATP and αβ-meATP were attributed to actions at P2X1 receptors on the vascular smooth muscle, whereas it was shown for the first time that UTP induced an endothelium-dependent vasoconstriction which may involve P2Y₂ and/or P2Y₄ receptors. The relaxation induced by ADP is mediated by P2Y₁ and A_2A adenosine receptors. Porcine pancreatic arteries appear to lack vasorelaxant P2Y₂ and P2Y₄ receptors.     

P2Y2 Nucleotide Receptors Mediate Metalloprotease-dependent Phosphorylation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and ErbB3 in Human Salivary Gland Cells

The G protein-coupled receptor P2Y₂ nucleotide receptor (P2Y₂R) has been shown to be up-regulated in a variety of tissues in response to stress or injury. Recent studies have suggested that P2Y₂Rs may play a role in immune responses, wound healing, and tissue regeneration via their ability to activate multiple signaling pathways, including activation of growth factor receptors. Here, we demonstrate that in human salivary gland (HSG) cells, activation of the P2Y₂R by its agonist induces phosphorylation of ERK1/2 via two distinct mechanisms, a rapid, protein kinase C-dependent pathway and a slower and prolonged, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-dependent pathway. The EGFR-dependent stimulation of UTP-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation in HSG cells is inhibited by the adamalysin inhibitor tumor necrosis factor-α protease inhibitor or by small interfering RNA that selectively silences ADAM10 and ADAM17 expression, suggesting that ADAM metalloproteases are required for P2Y₂R-mediated activation of the EGFR. G protein-coupled receptors have been shown to promote proteolytic release of EGFR ligands; however, neutralizing antibodies to known ligands of the EGFR did not inhibit UTP-induced EGFR phosphorylation. Immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that UTP causes association of the EGFR with another member of the EGF receptor family, ErbB3. Furthermore, stimulation of HSG cells with UTP induced phosphorylation of ErbB3, and silencing of ErbB3 expression inhibited UTP-induced phosphorylation of both ErbB3 and EGFR. UTP-induced phosphorylation of ErbB3 and EGFR was also inhibited by silencing the expression of the ErbB3 ligand neuregulin 1 (NRG1). These results suggest that P2Y₂R activation in salivary gland cells promotes the formation of EGFR/ErbB3 heterodimers and metalloprotease-dependent neuregulin 1 release, resulting in the activation of both EGFR and ErbB3.     

Synthesis, structure–affinity relationships, and modeling of AMDA analogs at 5-HT2A and H1 receptors: Structural factors contributing to selectivity

Histamine H₁ and serotonin 5-HT_2A receptors present in the CNS have been implicated in various neuropsychiatric disorders. 9-Aminomethyl-9,10-dihydroanthracene (AMDA), a conformationally constrained diarylalkyl amine derivative, has affinity for both of these receptors. A structure–affinity relationship (SAFIR) study was carried out studying the effects of N-methylation, varying the linker chain length and constraint of the aromatic rings on the binding affinities of the compounds with the 5-HT_2A and H₁ receptors. Homology modeling of the 5-HT_2A and H₁ receptors suggests that AMDA and its analogs, the parent of which is a 5-HT_2A antagonist, can bind in a fashion analogous to that of classical H₁ antagonists whose ring systems are oriented toward the fifth and sixth transmembrane helices. The modeled orientation of the ligands are consistent with the reported site-directed mutagenesis data for 5-HT_2A and H₁ receptors and provide a potential explanation for the selectivity of ligands acting at both receptors.     

Molecular defects of the platelet P2 receptors

Human platelets express three types of P2 receptors, which play important roles in platelet function: P2X₁, P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂. Only patients with either quantitative or qualitative abnormalities of the platelet P2Y₁₂ receptor have been well-characterized so far. Deficiencies of P2Y₁₂ are associated with nucleotide deletions in the open-reading frame, frameshifts, and early truncation of the protein, or with a nucleotide substitution in the transduction initiation codon. Congenital dysfunctions of P2Y₁₂ are associated with molecular defects involving the sixth trans-membrane domain or the adjacent third extracellular loop of the receptor, which identify a region of the protein whose integrity is necessary for normal receptor function. A mutation, predicting a lysine to glutamate (Lys174Glu) substitution was associated with decreased ligand binding to the receptor, suggesting that it is responsible for disruption of the adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-binding site of the receptor. Patients with P2Y₁₂ defects display a mild-to-moderate bleeding diathesis, characterized by mucocutaneous bleedings and excessive post-surgical and post-traumatic blood loss. Defects of P2Y₁₂ should be suspected when ADP, even at high concentrations (≥10 μM), is unable to induce full, irreversible platelet aggregation. Tests that evaluate the degree of inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by ADP should be used to confirm the diagnosis.     

The fate of P2Y-related orphan receptors: GPR80/99 and GPR91 are receptors of dicarboxylic acids

Several orphan G protein-coupled receptors are structurally close to the family of P2Y nucleotide receptors: GPR80/99 and GPR91 are close to P2Y_1/2/4/6/11 receptors, whereas GPR87, H963 and GPR34 are close to P2Y_12/13/14. Over the years, several laboratories have attempted without success to identify the ligands of those receptors. In early 2004, two papers have been published: One claiming that GPR80/99 is an AMP receptor, called P2Y₁₅, and the other one showing that GPR80/99 is a receptor for -ketoglutarate, while GPR91 is a succinate receptor. The accompanying paper by Qi et al. entirely supports that GPR80/99 is an -ketoglutarate receptor and not an AMP receptor. The closeness of dicarboxylic acid and P2Y nucleotide receptors might be linked to the negative charges of both types of ligands and the involvement of conserved Arg residues in their neutralization.     

Molecular recognition in the P2Y14 receptor: Probing the structurally permissive terminal sugar moiety of uridine-5′-diphosphoglucose

The P2Y₁₄ receptor, a nucleotide signaling protein, is activated by uridine-5′-diphosphoglucose 1 and other uracil nucleotides. We have determined that the glucose moiety of 1 is the most structurally permissive region for designing analogues of this P2Y₁₄ agonist. For example, the carboxylate group of uridine-5′-diphosphoglucuronic acid proved to be suitable for flexible substitution by chain extension through an amide linkage. Functionalized congeners containing terminal 2-acylaminoethylamides prepared by this strategy retained P2Y₁₄ activity, and molecular modeling predicted close proximity of this chain to the second extracellular loop of the receptor. In addition, replacement of glucose with other sugars did not diminish P2Y₁₄ potency. For example, the [5′′]ribose derivative had an EC₅₀ of 0.24 μM. Selective monofluorination of the glucose moiety indicated a role for the 2′′- and 6′′-hydroxyl groups of 1 in receptor recognition. The β-glucoside was twofold less potent than the native α-isomer, but methylene replacement of the 1′′-oxygen abolished activity. Replacement of the ribose ring system with cyclopentyl or rigid bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane groups abolished activity. Uridine-5′-diphosphoglucose also activates the P2Y₂ receptor, but the 2-thio analogue and several of the potent modified-glucose analogues were P2Y₁₄-selective.     

Regional expression of P2Y4 receptors in the rat central nervous system

P2Y receptors are G protein-coupled receptors composed of eight known subunits (P2Y_{1, 2, 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14}), which are involved in different functions in neural tissue. The present study investigates the expression pattern of P2Y₄ receptors in the rat central nervous system (CNS) using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. The specificity of the immunostaining has been verified by preabsorption, Western blot, and combined use of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Neurons expressing P2Y₄ receptors were distributed widely in the rat CNS. Heavy P2Y₄ receptor immunostaining was observed in the magnocellular neuroendocrine neurons of the hypothalamus, red nucleus, pontine nuclei, mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus, motor trigeminal nucleus, ambiguous nucleus, inferior olive, hypoglossal nucleus, and dorsal motor vagus nucleus. Both neurons and astrocytes express P2Y₄ receptors. P2Y₄ receptor immunostaining signals were mainly confined to cell bodies and dendrites of neurons, suggesting that P2Y₄ receptors are mainly involved in regulating postsynaptic events. In the hypothalamus, all the vasopressin (VP) and oxytocin (OT) neurons and all the orexin A neurons were immunoreactive for P2Y₄ receptors. All the neurons expressing P2Y₄ receptors were found to express N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor 1 (NR1). These data suggest that purines and pyrimidines might be involved in regulation of the release of the neuropeptides VP, OT, and orexin in the rat hypothalamus via P2Y₄ receptors. Further, the physiological and pathophysiological functions of the neurons may operate through coupling between P2Y₄ receptors and NR1.     

Comparative hydrolysis of P2 receptor agonists by NTPDases 1, 2, 3 and 8

Nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolases 1, 2, 3 and 8 (NTPDases 1, 2, 3 and 8) are the dominant ectonucleotidases and thereby expected to play important roles in nucleotide signaling. Distinct biochemical characteristics of individual NTPDases should allow them to regulate P2 receptor activation differentially. Therefore, the biochemical and kinetic properties of these enzymes were compared. NTPDases 1, 2, 3 and 8 efficiently hydrolyzed ATP and UTP with K_m values in the micromolar range, indicating that they should terminate the effects exerted by these nucleotide agonists at P2X_1–7 and P2Y_2,4,11 receptors. Since NTPDase1 does not allow accumulation of ADP, it should terminate the activation of P2Y_1,12,13 receptors far more efficiently than the other NTPDases. In contrast, NTPDases 2, 3 and 8 are expected to promote the activation of ADP specific receptors, because in the presence of ATP they produce a sustained (NTPDase2) or transient (NTPDases 3 and 8) accumulation of ADP. Interestingly, all plasma membrane NTPDases dephosphorylate UTP with a significant accumulation of UDP, favoring P2Y₆ receptor activation. NTPDases differ in divalent cation and pH dependence, although all are active in the pH range of 7.0–8.5. Various NTPDases may also distinctly affect formation of extracellular adenosine and therefore adenosine receptor-mediated responses, since they generate different amounts of the substrate (AMP) and inhibitor (ADP) of ecto-5-nucleotidase, the rate limiting enzyme in the production of adenosine. Taken together, these data indicate that plasma membrane NTPDases hydrolyze nucleotides in a distinctive manner and may therefore differentially regulate P2 and adenosine receptor signaling.     

Signaling of the human P2Y<Subscript>1</Subscript> receptor measured by a yeast growth assay with comparisons to assays of phospholipase C and calcium mobilization in 1321N1 human astrocytoma cells

The human P2Y₁ receptor was expressed in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain MPY578q5, which is engineered to couple to mammalian G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and requires agonist-induced activation for growth. A range of known P2Y₁ receptor agonists were examined with the yeast growth assay system, and the results were validated by comparing with potencies in the transfected 1321N1 astrocytoma cell line, in which calcium mobilization was measured with a FLIPR (fluorometric-imaging plate reader). The data were also compared with those from phospholipase C activation and radioligand binding with the use of a newly available radioligand [³H]MRS2279 (2-chloro-N ⁶-methyl-(N)-methanocarba-2’-deoxyadenosine-3’,5’bisphosphate). In the yeast growth assay, the rank order of potency of 2-MeSADP (2-methylthioadenosine 5’-diphosphate), ADP (adenosine 5’-diphosphate), and ATP (adenosine 5’-triphosphate) is the same as those in other assay systems, i.e., 2-MeSADP>ADP>ATP. The P2Y₁-selective antagonist MRS2179 (N ⁶-methyl-2-deoxyadenosine-3’,5’-bisphosphate) was shown to act as an antagonist with similar potency in all systems. The results suggest that the yeast expression system is suitable for screening P2Y₁ receptor ligands, both agonists and antagonists. The yeast system should be useful for random mutagenesis of GPCRs to identify mutants with certain properties, such as selective potency enhancement for small synthetic molecules and constitutive activity.     

Structural and functional evolution of the P2Y12-like receptor group

Metabotropic pyrimidine and purine nucleotide receptors (P2Y receptors) belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). They are distinguishable from adenosine receptors (P1) as they bind adenine and/or uracil nucleotide triphosphates or diphosphates depending on the subtype. Over the past decade, P2Y receptors have been cloned from a variety of tissues and species, and as many as eight functional subtypes have been characterized. Most recently, several members of the P2Y₁₂-like receptor group, which includes the clopidogrel-sensitive ADP receptor P2Y₁₂, have been deorphanized. The P2Y₁₂-like receptor group comprises several structurally related GPCR which, however, display heterogeneous agonist specificity including nucleotides, their derivatives, and lipids. Besides the established function of P2Y₁₂ in platelet activation, expression in macrophages, neuronal and glial cells as well as recent results from functional studies implicate that several members of this group may have specific functions in neurotransmission, inflammation, chemotaxis, and response to tissue injury. This review focuses specifically on the structure-function relation and shortly summarizes some aspects of the physiological relevance of P2Y₁₂-like receptor members.     

Identification of the orphan GPCR, P2Y(10) receptor as the sphingosine-1-phosphate and lysophosphatidic acid receptor

Phylogenetic analysis of transmembrane regions of GPCRs using PHYLIP indicated that the orphan receptor P2Y₁₀ receptor was classified into the cluster consisting nucleotide and lipid receptors. Based on the results, we studied the abilities of nucleotides and lipids to activate the P2Y₁₀ receptors. As a result, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) evoked intracellular Ca²⁺ increases in the CHO cells stably expressing the P2Y₁₀ fused with a G_16α protein. These Ca²⁺ responses were inhibited by S1P receptor and LPA receptor antagonists. The introduction of siRNA designed for P2Y₁₀ receptor into the P2Y₁₀-CHO cells effectively blocked both S1P- and LPA-induced Ca²⁺ increases. RT-PCR analysis showed that the mouse P2Y₁₀ was expressed in reproductive organs, brain, lung and skeletal muscle, suggesting the receptor plays physiological roles throughout the whole body. In conclusion, the P2Y₁₀ receptor is the first receptor identified as a dual lysophospholipid receptor.     

Dopamine D1 receptor and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist effects of the natural product (–)-stepholidine: molecular modelling and dynamics simulations

In this study, by homology modelling and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, models of l-stepholidine (l-SPD) activating the 5-HT_1A and D₁ receptors were constructed. In 100-ns MD simulations, the D₁ and 5-HT_1A receptors were activated by the partial agonist l-SPD, conforming with the global toggle switch activation model and the sequential activation model. The residues Y^7.53 and Y^5.58 swing significantly between different transmembrane (TM) domains after activation. Similarities between D₁ and 5-HT_1A included (1) the outward motion of TM-5; (2) the ionic lock was independent of the tilt of TM-6 and (3) there was an apparent bending of TM-6, and the ring of l-SPD formed strong π–π interactions with residue W^6.48. Differences between the two included the following: (1) in 5-HT_1A, l-SPD formed a hydrogen bond with Ala172^5.46 of TM-5, and the intracellular end of TM-5 moved outward slowly; that hydrogen bond did not form with the D₁ receptor; (2) l-SPD formed stronger interactions with D^3.32 and W^6.48 in the D₁ receptor than in the 5-HT_1A receptor and (3) the hydrogen bonding network was somewhat different in SPD-5-HT_1A and SPD-D₁ receptors. We propose the interaction between l-SPD and D^3.32 or/and W^6.48 is the original driving force during the whole activation process.