Dopamine-induced functional activation of Gαq mediated by dopamine D1-like receptor in rat cerebral cortical membranes

Although multiple roles of dopamine through D₁-like (D₁ and D₅) and D₂-like (D₂, D₃, and D₄) receptors are initiated primarily through stimulation or inhibition of adenylyl cyclase via G_s/olf or G_i/o, respectively, there have been many reports indicating diverse signaling mechanisms that involve alternative G protein coupling. In this study, dopamine-induced Gα_q activation in rat brain membranes was investigated. Agonist-induced Gα_q activation was assessed by increase in guanosine-5′-O-(3-[³⁵S]thio)triphosphate ([³⁵S]GTPγS) binding to Gα_q determined by [³⁵S]GTPγS binding/immunoprecipitation assay in rat brain membranes. Dopamine-stimulated Gα_q functionality was highest in cortex as compared to hippocampus or striatum. In cerebral cortical membranes, this effect was mimicked by benzazepine derivatives with agonist properties at dopamine D₁-like receptors, that is, SKF83959, SKF83822, R(+)-SKF81297, R(+)-SKF38393, and SKF82958, but not by the compounds with dopamine D₂-like receptor agonist properties except for aripiprazole. Against expectation, stimulatory effects were also induced by SKF83566, R(+)-SCH23390, and pergolide. The pharmacological profiling by using a series of antagonists indicated that dopamine-induced response was mediated through dopamine D₁-like receptor, which was distinct from the receptor involved in 5-HT-induced response (5-HT_2A receptor). Conversely, the responses induced by SKF83566, R(+)-SCH23390, and pergolide were most likely mediated by 5-HT_2A receptor, but not by dopamine D₁-like receptor. Caution should be paid when interpreting the experimental data, especially in behavioral pharmacological research, in which SKF83566 or R(+)-SCH23390 is used as a standard selective dopamine D₁-like receptor antagonist. Also, possible clinical implications of the agonistic effects of pergolide on 5-HT_2A receptor has been mentioned.     

Physicochemical Modulation of Agonist-Induced [35S]GTPγS Binding: Implications for Coexistence of Multiple Functional Conformations of Dopamine D1-Like Receptors

Dopamine agonist-stimulated [³⁵S]GTPγS binding to membrane G proteins was studied in select brain regions under experimental conditions that permit the activation of receptor coupling to the G proteins G_i, G_s, or G_q. Agents studied were agonists known to be effective at various dopamine receptor/effector systems and included quinelorane (D₂-like/G_i), SKF38393 (D₁-like/G_q, D₁-like/G_s), SKF85174 (D₁-like/G_s), and SKF83959 (D₁-like/G_q). Dopamine and SKF38393 significantly stimulated [³⁵S]GTPγS binding to normal striatal membranes by 161% and 67% above controls. Deoxycholate, which enhances agonist-induced phospholipase C (PLC) stimulation, markedly enhanced the agonistic effects of dopamine and SKF38393 to 530% and 637% above controls, respectively. The enhancing effects of deoxycholate were reversed if it was washed off the membranes before agonist addition. The thiol-reducing agent, dithiothreitol, completely abolished the effects of SKF38393 and SKF83959, whereas SKF85174 effects were augmented. Agonist responses were concentration-related, and highest efficacies were obtained in the hippocampus, thus paralleling both the brain regional distribution and agonist efficacies previously observed in phosphoinositide hydrolysis assays. These findings suggest that D₁-like receptor conformations that mediate agonist stimulation of G_s/adenylylcyclase may be structurally different from those that mediate G_q/PLC activation. Although the exact mechanism of deoxycholate's effect awaits elucidation, the results are consistent with the emerging concept of functional selectivity whereby deoxycholate could create a membrane environment that facilitates the transformation of the receptor from a conformation that activates G_s/adenylylcyclase to one that favors G_q/PLC signaling.     

Coupling of dopamine receptors to G proteins: studies with chimeric D2/D3 dopamine receptors

D₂ and D₃ dopamine receptors belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors; they share a high degree of homology and are structurally similar. However, they differ from each other in their second messenger coupling properties. Previously, we have studied the differential coupling of these receptors to G proteins and found that while D₂ receptor couples only to inhibitory G proteins, D₃ receptor couples also to a stimulatory G protein, Gs. We aimed to investigate the molecular basis of these differences and to determine which domains in the receptor control its coupling to G proteins. For this purpose four chimeras were constructed, each composed of different segments of the original D₂ and D₃ receptors. We have demonstrated that chimeras with a third cytoplasmic loop of D₂ receptor couple to Gi protein in a pattern characteristic of D₂ receptor. On the other hand chimeras containing a third cytoplasmic loop of D₃ receptor have coupling characteristics like those of D₃ receptor, and they couple also to Gs protein. These findings demonstrate that the third cytoplasmic loop determines and accounts for the coupling of dopamine receptors D₂ and D₃ to G proteins.     

Coupling of D1 and D5 dopamine receptors to multiple G proteins

Dopamine receptors are a subclass of the super family of G protein-coupled receptors, that transduce their effects by coupling to specific G proteins. Within the dopamine receptor family, the adenylyl cyclase stimulatory receptors include the D₁ and D₅ subtypes. The D₁ and D₅ dopamine receptors are genetically distinct, sharing >80% sequence homology within the highly conserved seven transmembrane spanning domains, but displaying only 50% overall homology at the amino acid level. When expressed in transfected GH₄C₁ rat pituitary cells, both D₁ and D₅ receptors stimulate adenylyl cyclase and have identical affinities toward dopaminergic agonists and antagonists. In order to analyze specific signaling pathways mediated by activation of either D₁ or D₅ receptors, we have identified the G proteins that are coupled to these receptors. Through functional analyses and competition binding studies, and from immunoprecipitation techniques, using antisera against the various α subunits of G proteins, we have established that both D₁ and D₅ receptors couple to G_sα. In addition, D₁ receptors are also coupled to G_oα. Since G_oα has been implicated in the regulation of Ca²⁺, K⁺, and Na⁺ channels, this finding would suggest that D₁ receptors can mediate the functional activity of these ion channels. There is also evidence to indicate that D₅ receptors couple to G_zα, a novel G protein abundantly expressed in neurons. Thus, despite similar pharmacological properties, such differential coupling of D₁ and D₅ receptors to G proteins other than G_sα, indicates that dopamine can transduce varied signaling responses upon the simultaneous stimulation of both these receptors.     

Disruption of the Plasma Membrane Integrity by Cholesterol Depletion Impairs Effectiveness of TRH Receptor-Mediated Signal Transduction via Gq/G11α Proteins

We monitored the radioligand-binding characteristics of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptors, functional activity of G_q/11α proteins, and functional status of the whole signaling cascade in HEK293 expressing high levels of TRH receptors and G₁₁α. Our analyses indicated that disruption of plasma membrane microdomains by cholesterol depletion did not markedly influence the binding parameters of TRH receptors, but it altered efficacy of signal transduction. The functional coupling between TRH receptor and G_q/11α was assessed by agonist-stimulated [³⁵S]GTPγS binding, and results of these measurements pointed out to significantly lower potency of TRH to mediate G protein activation in the plasma membrane fraction isolated from cholesterol-depleted cells; there was a shift in sensitivity by one order of magnitude to the higher concentrations. A markedly lower sensitivity to stimulation with TRH was also observed in our experiments dealing with determination of hormone-induced Ca²⁺ response. These data suggest that the intact structure of plasma membranes is an important optimum signal transduction initiated by TRH receptors and mediated by G_q/11α proteins.     

Adenylyl Cyclase Interaction with the D2 Dopamine Receptor Family; Differential Coupling to Gi, Gz, and Gs

1.The D2-type dopamine receptors are thought to inhibit adenylyl cyclase (AC), via coupling to pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G proteins of the Gi family. We examined whether and to what extent the various D2 receptors (D_2S, D_2L, D_3S, D_3L, and D₄) couple to the PTX-insensitive G protein Gz, to produce inhibition of AC activity.2.COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with the individual murine dopamine receptors alone, as well as together with the subunit of Gz. PTX treatment was employed to inactivate endogenous i, and coupling to Gi and Gz was estimated by measuring the inhibition of cAMP accumulation induced by quinpirole, in forskolin-stimulated cells.3.D_2S or D_2L receptors can couple to the same extent to Gi and to Gz. The D₄ dopamine receptor couples preferably to Gz, resulting in about 60% quinpirole-induced inhibition of cAMP accumulation. The D_3S and D_3L receptor isoforms couple slightly to Gz and result in 15 and 30% inhibition of cAMP accumulation, respectively.4.We have demonstrated for the first time that the two D₃ receptor isoforms, and not any of the other D2 receptor subtypes, also couple to Gs in both COS-7 and CHO transfected cells, in the presence of PTX.5.Thus, the differential coupling of the D2 dopamine receptor subtypes to various G proteins may add another aspect to the diversity of dopamine receptor function.     

Roles of G protein and beta-arrestin in dopamine D2 receptor-mediated ERK activation

ERK activation by dopamine D₂ receptor (D₂R) has been extensively characterized in various cell types including brain tissues. However, the involvement of β-arrestin in the D₂R-mediated ERK activation is not clear yet. Three different strategies were employed in this study to determine the roles of G protein or β-arrestin in D₂R-mediated ERK activation. The cellular level of β-arrestins was reduced by RNA interference and pertussis toxin-insensitive Gi proteins were used to identify the G protein involved. Finally point mutations of D₂R in which coupling with G protein was abolished but the interaction with β-arrestin was increased, were employed to determine whether the affinity between D₂R and β-arrestin is a critical factor for β-arrestin-mediated ERK activation. Our results show that G_i2 protein is involved in D₂R-mediated ERK activation but β-arrestins are either not involved or play minor role.     

The IGF-II receptor system: A G protein-linked mechanism

Based on the finding that stimulation of the IGF-II, receptor (IGF-IIR) is capable of activating G_i2 and calcium channels in BALB/c 3T3 fibroblasts, it was found that purified IGF-IIR can couple directly to purified G_i2 in phospholipid vesicles. IGF-IIR–G_i2 coupling can be characterized as follows. IGF-IIR directly couples to G_i2 in response to IGF-II in a stoichiometrical manner, suggesting that IGF-IIR works as a transmembrane signaling molecule and that the seven-transmembrane structure is not essential for receptor-G protein coupling. The mode of IGF-IIR–G_i2 interaction is similar to that of conventional receptor–G protein coupling, suggesting that a common G protein recognition mechanism is shared by IGF-IIR and conventional G-coupled receptors. The action of IGF-IIR is specific on G_i2 among various G proteins. Finally, the activity of IGF-IIR on G_i2 is similarly potent across the species of the proteins. These characteristics led to the discovery of a 14-amino-acid region in IGF-IIR that can directly interact with and activate G_i2, and is located at residues 2410–2423 of the human receptor. Subsequent work has indicated that this region is responsible for G_i-coupling function of intact IGF-IIR. The most important extensions of this discovery are the following: (1) The structure–function relationship for the G_i-activating function of this 14-amino-acid sequence, (2) the prediction of G protein-coupled functions of receptors based on the results obtained from 1), and (3) clarification of the detailed mechanism whereby ligand–receptor complex recognizes G proteins. This paper reviews what we have learned from IGF-IIR in terms of receptor–G protein interfaces and discusses future prospects. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Positive and Negative Coupling of the Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors to a G Protein–activated K+ Channel,GIRK, in Xenopus Oocytes

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) control intracellular signaling cascades through activation of G proteins. The inwardly rectifying K⁺ channel, GIRK, is activated by the βγ subunits of G_i proteins and is widely expressed in the brain. We investigated whether an interaction between mGluRs and GIRK is possible, using Xenopus oocytes expressing mGluRs and a cardiac/brain subunit of GIRK, GIRK1, with or without another brain subunit, GIRK2. mGluRs known to inhibit adenylyl cyclase (types 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7) activated the GIRK channel. The strongest response was observed with mGluR2; it was inhibited by pertussis toxin (PTX). This is consistent with the activation of GIRK by G_i/G_o-coupled receptors. In contrast, mGluR1a and mGluR5 receptors known to activate phospholipase C, presumably via G proteins of the G_q class, inhibited the channel''s activity. The inhibition was preceded by an initial weak activation, which was more prominent at higher levels of mGluR1a expression. The inhibition of GIRK activity by mGluR1a was suppressed by a broad-specificity protein kinase inhibitor, staurosporine, and by a specific protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor, bis-indolylmaleimide, but not by PTX, Ca²⁺ chelation, or calphostin C. Thus, mGluR1a inhibits the GIRK channel primarily via a pathway involving activation of a PTX-insensitive G protein and, eventually, of a subtype of PKC, possibly PKC-μ. In contrast, the initial activation of GIRK1 caused by mGluR1a was suppressed by PTX but not by the protein kinase inhibitors. Thus, this activation probably results from a promiscuous coupling of mGluR1a to a G_i/G_o protein. The observed modulations may be involved in the mGluRs'' effects on neuronal excitability in the brain. Inhibition of GIRK by phospholipase C–activating mGluRs bears upon the problem of specificity of G protein (GIRK interaction) helping to explain why receptors coupled to G_q are inefficient in activating GIRK.     

多巴胺受体的cDNA克隆

通过多巴胺受体的5个cDNA克隆,综述和分析了5个多巴胺受体(D₁R-D₅R)的基因结构,在染色体上的定位及其mRNA在中枢脑区的分布;比较了这5个受体cDNA克隆的结构特征和药理学性质.     

A yeast screening method to decipher the interaction between the adenosine A2B receptor and the C-terminus of different G protein α-subunits

The expression of human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae containing chimeric yeast/mammalian G_α subunits provides a useful tool for the study of GPCR activation. In this study, we used a one-GPCR-one-G protein yeast screening method in combination with molecular modeling and mutagenesis studies to decipher the interaction between GPCRs and the C-terminus of different α-subunits of G proteins. We chose the human adenosine A_2B receptor (hA_2BR) as a paradigm, a typical class A GPCR that shows promiscuous behavior in G protein coupling in this yeast system. The wild-type hA_2BR and five mutant receptors were expressed in 8 yeast strains with different humanized G proteins, covering the four major classes: G_αi, G_αs, G_αq, and G_α12. Our experiments showed that a tyrosine residue (Y) at the C-terminus of the G_α subunit plays an important role in controlling the activation of GPCRs. Receptor residues R103^3.50 and I107^3.54 are vital too in G protein-coupling and the activation of the hA_2BR, whereas L213^IL3 is more important in G protein inactivation. Substitution of S235^6.36 to alanine provided the most divergent G protein-coupling profile. Finally, L236^6.37 substitution decreased receptor activation in all G protein pathways, although to a different extent. In conclusion, our findings shed light on the selectivity of receptor/G protein coupling, which may help in further understanding GPCR signaling.     

Adenosine A1 Agonists and the Ca2+ Channel Agonist Bay K 8644 Produce a Synergistic Stimulation of the GTPase Activity of Go in Rat Frontal Cortical Membranes

Abstract: The identity and role of G proteins in coupling adenosine receptors to effectors have been studied to a limited degree. We have identified the G proteins whose GTPase activity is stimulated by adenosine receptor agonists in neuronal membranes. (R)-Phenylisopropyladenosine, 2-chloroadenosine, and N-ethylcarboxamideadenosine produced a concentration-dependent stimulation of GTPase. At 10^?5M, the increase above basal GTPase in frontal cortex was 25 ± 4, 20 ± 3, and 8 ± 1%, respectively, and in the cerebellum 55 ± 2, 41 ± 4, and 22 ± 2%, respectively. The effects of (R)-phenylisopropyladenosine and 2-chloroadenosine were inhibited by (1) A₁ antagonists (76–96% reduction), (2) pretreatment with pertussis toxin (90–100% reduction), and (3) antibodies raised against the α-subunit of G_i and G_o (55–57% reduction by each), suggesting that A₁ receptors interact equally with G_i and G_o. (R)-Phenylisopropyladenosine increased the binding of a nonhydrolyzable analogue of GTP to membranes in a pertussis toxin-sensitive manner, indicative of activation of G_i or G_o. Previously, (±)-Bay K 8644 enhanced GTP hydrolysis by G_o but not G_i. Now we report a profound synergistic stimulation of GTPase in the presence of (R)-phenylisopropyladenosine and (±)-Bay K 8644 (10^?7 to 10^?5M). (±)-Bay K 8644 had no effect on nucleotide exchange and, thus, cannot activate G_o. It appears that a positive cooperative stimulation of G_o occurs when it is first activated by A₁ receptors and subsequently interacts with the L-type Ca²⁺ channel.     

Gαq-mediated plasma membrane translocation of sphingosine kinase-1 and cross-activation of S1P receptors

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), formed by sphingosine kinases (SphKs), regulates cellular proliferation and migration by acting as an agonist at specific receptors or intracellularly. Since S1P's effects are probably dependent on subcellular localization of its formation and degradation, we have studied the influence of G protein-coupled receptors on the localization of SphK1. Activation of G_q-coupled receptors induced a profound, rapid (half-life 3–5 s) and long-lasting (> 2 h) translocation of SphK1 to the plasma membrane. This was mimicked by expression of constitutively active G protein α-subunits specifically of the G_q family. Classical G_q signalling pathways, or phosphorylation at Ser²²⁵, phospholipase D and Ca²⁺/calmodulin were not involved in M₃ receptor-induced SphK1 translocation in HEK-293 cells. Translocation was associated with S1P receptor internalization, which was dependent on catalytic activity of SphK1 and S1P receptor binding and thus resulted from S1P receptor cross-activation. It is concluded that SphK1 is an important effector of G_q-coupled receptors, linking them via cross-activation of S1P receptors to G_i and G_12/13 signalling pathways.     

Expression of the μ-Opioid Receptor in CHO Cells: Ability of μ-Opioid Ligands to Promote α-Azidoanilido[32P]GTP Labeling of Multiple G Protein α Subunits

Abstract: The identities of heterotrimeric G proteins that can interact with the μ-opioid receptor were investigated by α-azidoanilido[³²P]GTP labeling of α subunits in the presence of opioid agonists in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-MORIVA3 cells, a CHO clone that stably expressed μ-opioid receptor cDNA (MOR-1). This clone expressed 1.01 × 10⁶μ-opioid receptors per cell and had higher binding affinity and potency to inhibit adenylyl cyclase for the μ-opioid-selective ligands [d -Ala²,N-MePhe⁴,Gly-ol]-enkephalin and [N-MePhe³,d -Pro⁴]-morphiceptin, relative to the δ-selective opioid agonist [d -Pen²,d -Pen⁵]-enkephalin or the κ-selective opioid agonist U-50,488H. μ-Opioid ligands induced an increase in α-azidoanilido[³²P]GTP photoaffinity labeling of four Gα subunits in this clone, three of which were identified as G_i3α, G_i2α, and G_o2α. The same pattern of simultaneous interaction of the μ-opioid receptor with multiple Gα subunits was also observed in two other clones, one expressing about three times more and the other 10-fold fewer receptors as those expressed in CHO-MORIVA3 cells. The opioid-induced increase of labeling of these G proteins was agonist specific, concentration dependent, and blocked by naloxone and by pretreatment of these cells with pertussis toxin. A greater agonist-induced increase of α-azidoanilido[³²P]GTP incorporation into G_i2α (160–280%) and G_o2α (110–220%) than for an unknown Gα (G_?α) (60%) or G_i3α (40%) was produced by three different μ-opioid ligands tested. In addition, slight differences were also found between the ability of various μ-opioid agonists to produce half-maximal labeling (ED₅₀) of any given Gα subunit, with a rank order of G_i3α > G_o2α > G_i2α = G_?α. In any case, these results suggest that the activated μ-opioid receptor couples to four distinct G protein α subunits simultaneously.     

The dopamine D1 receptor is expressed and facilitates relaxation in airway smooth muscle

Background

Dopamine signaling is mediated by G_s protein-coupled “D₁-like” receptors (D₁ and D₅) and G_i-coupled “D₂-like” receptors (D_2-4). In asthmatic patients, inhaled dopamine induces bronchodilation. Although the G_i-coupled dopamine D₂ receptor is expressed and sensitizes adenylyl cyclase activity in airway smooth muscle (ASM) cells, the G_s-coupled dopamine D₁-like receptor subtypes have never been identified on these cells. Activation of G_s-coupled receptors stimulates cyclic AMP (cAMP) production through the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase, which promotes ASM relaxation. We questioned whether the dopamine D₁-like receptor is expressed on ASM, and modulates its function through G_s-coupling.

Methods

The mRNA and protein expression of dopamine D₁-like receptor subtypes in both native human and guinea pig ASM tissue and cultured human ASM (HASM) cells was measured. To characterize the stimulation of cAMP through the dopamine D₁ receptor, HASM cells were treated with dopamine or the dopamine D₁-like receptor agonists ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"A68930","term_id":"4759850","term_text":"A68930"}}A68930 or {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"SKF38393","term_id":"1157151916","term_text":"SKF38393"}}SKF38393) before cAMP measurements. To evaluate whether the activation of dopamine D₁ receptor induces ASM relaxation, guinea pig tracheal rings suspended under isometric tension in organ baths were treated with cumulatively increasing concentrations of dopamine or {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"A68930","term_id":"4759850","term_text":"A68930"}}A68930, following an acetylcholine-induced contraction with or without the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) inhibitor Rp-cAMPS, the large-conductance calcium-activated potassium (BK_Ca) channel blocker iberiotoxin, or the exchange proteins directly activated by cAMP (Epac) antagonist NSC45576.

Results

Messenger RNA encoding the dopamine D₁ and D₅ receptors were detected in native human ASM tissue and cultured HASM cells. Immunoblots confirmed the protein expression of the dopamine D₁ receptor in both native human and guinea pig ASM tissue and cultured HASM cells. The dopamine D₁ receptor was also immunohistochemically localized to both human and guinea pig ASM. The dopamine D₁-like receptor agonists stimulated cAMP production in HASM cells, which was reversed by the selective dopamine D₁-like receptor antagonists {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"SCH23390","term_id":"1052733334","term_text":"SCH23390"}}SCH23390 or {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"SCH39166","term_id":"1052842517","term_text":"SCH39166"}}SCH39166. {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"A68930","term_id":"4759850","term_text":"A68930"}}A68930 relaxed acetylcholine-contracted guinea pig tracheal rings, which was attenuated by Rp-cAMPS but not by iberiotoxin or NSC45576.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate that the dopamine D₁ receptors are expressed on ASM and regulate smooth muscle force via cAMP activation of PKA, and offer a novel target for therapeutic relaxation of ASM.     

Prokineticin receptors interact unselectively with several G protein subtypes but bind selectively to β-arrestin 2

Prokineticin 1 (pk1) and prokineticin 2 (pk2) interact with two structurally related G-protein coupled receptors, prokineticin receptor 1 (PKR1) and prokineticin receptor 2 (PKR2). Cellular signalling studies show that the activated receptors can evoke Ca²⁺-mobilization, pertussis toxin-sensitive ERK phosphorylation, and intracellular cAMP accumulation, which suggests the partecipation of several G protein subtypes, such as G_q/11, G_i/o and G_s. However, direct interactions with these transduction proteins have not been studied yet. Here we measured by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) the association of PKR1 and PKR2 with different heterotrimeric Gα proteins in response to pk1 and pk2 activation. Using host-cell lines carrying gene deletions of Gα_q/11 or Gα_s, and pertussis toxin treatment to abolish the receptor interactions with Gα_i/o, we determined that both receptors could couple with comparable efficiency to G_q/11 and G_i/o, but far less efficiently to G_s or other pertussis toxin-insensitive G proteins. We also used BRET methodology to assess the association of prokineticin receptors with β-arrestin isoforms. Fluorescent versions of the isoforms were transfected both in HEK293 cells and in double KO β-arrestin 1/2 mouse fibroblasts, to study receptor interaction with the reconstituted individual β-arrestins without background expression of the endogenous genes. Both receptors formed stable BRET-emitting complexes with β-arrestin 2 but not with β-arrestin 1, indicating strong selectivity for the former. In all the studied transducer interactions and in both receptors, pk2 was more potent than pk1 in promoting receptor binding to transduction proteins.     

G protein dependent alterations in [125I]iodocyanopindolol and±cyanopindolol binding at 5-HT1B binding sites in rat brain membranes

Several manipulations that affect G protein/receptor coupling also alter the binding of [¹²⁵I]iodocyanopindolol ([¹²⁵I]ICYP)±cyanopindolol (±CYP) to rat brain 5-HT_1B binding sites in radiologand binding assays. Inclusion of 5 mM MgSO₄ in these assays results in a small but significant increase in the affinity of [¹²⁵I]ICYP (fromK _D=0.046 nM toK _D=0.037 nM). In contrast, 100 M Gpp(NH)p, GTP, or GDP reduce [¹²⁵I]ICYP affinity (K _D=0.056 nM with GTP) while ATP and GMP are less effective.±CYP affinity for 5-HT_1B sites labeled by [³H]dihydroergotamine ([³H]DE) also displays a small but significant reduction (from K_i=1.4 nM to K_i=3.5nM) by the inclusion of 100 M GTP. Pre-treatment of the brain membranes with N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) in concentrations known to inactivate many G proteins reduces 5-HT_1B specific binding of [¹²⁵I]ICYP. The NEM induced reduction in [¹²⁵I]ICYP binding can be reversed by reconstitution with purified exogenous G proteins (Go and Gi), demonstrating directly that high affinity binding of [¹²⁵I]ICYP to 5-HT_1B sites is dependent on G proteins. The effects of Mg²⁺ ion, guanine nucleotides, NEM and G protein reconstitution on [¹²⁵I]ICYP and ±CYP binding are all hallmarks of agonist binding to G protein linked receptors. The effect of GTP, however, is quantitatively much less for the binding of these pindolol derivatives than for the binding of 5-HT, a presumed full agonist at 5-HT_1B sites. The relatively slight stabilization of [¹²⁵I]ICYP and ±CYP binding conferred by G protein/5-HT_1B receptor interaction may reflect the molecular events underlying previous observations that these compounds are partial 5-HT_1B agoinists.     

Differential voltage-sensitivity of D2-like dopamine receptors

Agonist potency at some neurotransmitter receptors has been shown to be regulated by transmembrane voltage, a mechanism which has been suggested to play a crucial role in the regulation of neurotransmitter release by autoreceptors and in synaptic plasticity. We have recently described the voltage-sensitivity of the dopamine D_2L receptor and we now extend our studies to include the other members of the D₂-like receptor subfamily; the D_2S, D₃, and D₄ dopamine receptors. Electrophysiological recordings were performed on Xenopus oocytes coexpressing human dopamine D_2S, D₃, or D₄ receptors with G protein-coupled potassium (GIRK) channels. Comparison of concentration-response relationships at −80 mV and at 0 mV for dopamine-mediated GIRK activation revealed significant rightward shifts for both D_2S and D₄ upon depolarization. In contrast, the concentration-response relationships for D₃-mediated GIRK activation were not appreciably different at the two voltages. Our findings provide new insight into the functional differences of these closely related receptors.     

Cellular models for the study of the pharmacology and signaling of melanin-concentrating hormone receptors

Cellular models for the study of the neuropeptide melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) have become indispensable tools for pharmacological profiling and signaling analysis of MCH and its synthetic analogues. Although expression of MCH receptors is most abundant in the brain, MCH-R₁ is also found in different peripheral tissues. Therefore, not only cell lines derived from nervous tissue but also from peripheral tissues that naturally express MCH receptors have been used to study receptor signaling and regulation. For screening of novel compounds, however, heterologous expression of MCH-R₁ or MCH-R₂ genes in HEK293, Chinese hamster ovary, COS-7, or 3T3-L1 cells, or amplified MCH-R₁ expression/signaling in IRM23 cells transfected with the G_q protein gene are the preferred tools because of more distinct pharmacological effects induced by MCH, which include inhibition of cAMP formation, stimulation of inositol triphosphate production, increase in intracellular free Ca²⁺ and/or activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases. Most of the published data originate from this type of model system, whereas data based on studies with cell lines endogenously expressing MCH receptors are more limited. This review presents an update on the different cellular models currently used for the analysis of MCH receptor interaction and signaling.