Effects of neuropeptide Y on food intake and brain biogenic amines in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most potent stimulants of food intake in mammals, but very little is known about NPY actions in fish. The present study investigated the role of NPY in food intake in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Food intake was monitored at different times after intracerebroventricular administration of porcine NPY (4 or 8 microg). Both doses significantly increased food intake at 2 and 3 h, and this effect was dose-dependent. However, 50 h after administration of NPY, food intake was significantly lower than in control fish, and cumulative food intake had returned to levels similar to those seen in the control group. The NPY antagonist (D-Tyr27,36, D-Thr32)-NPY (10 microg) inhibited food intake 2 h after icv administration, but did not block the orexigenic effect of NPY when administered jointly with 4 microg NPY. To identify the NPY receptor subtypes involved in the effects of NPY on food intake, we studied the effects of the Y1 receptor agonist (Leu31, Pro34)-NPY (4 microg), the Y2 receptor agonist NPY(3-36) (4 microg), and the highly specific Y5 receptor agonist (cPP(1-7), NPY19-23, Ala31, Aib32, Gln34)-hPP (4 microg). Short-term (2 h) food intake was moderately stimulated by the Y1 agonist, more strongly stimulated by the Y2 agonist, and unaffected by the Y5 agonist. We found that administration of NPY (8 microg icv) had no effect on aminergic systems in several brain regions 2 and 50 h after NPY administration. These results indicate that NPY stimulates feeding in the rainbow trout, and suggest that this effect is cooperatively mediated by Y2- and Y1-like NPY receptors, not by Y5-like receptors.     

Neuropeptide Y-Y1 receptor modulates nitric oxide level during stroke in the rat

In a rat endovascular middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) stroke model, we previously showed that intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of neuropeptide Y (NPY) or an Y1 receptor agonist, [Leu(31),Pro(34)]-NPY, increased the infarct volume, that an Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP3226, reduced the infarct volume, and that an Y2 receptor agonist, NPY3-36, had no effect. In this study, we used electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy to measure nitric oxide (NO) and examined how ICV administration of NPY or its receptor analogs would modulate the brain NO level between the bregma levels +2 and -4 mm during MCAO, since excessive NO mediates ischemic damage. The relative brain NO concentration was increased to 131.94 +/- 7.99% (mean +/- SEM; n = 8) at 15 min of MCAO. NPY treatment further increased the relative brain NO concentration to 250.94 +/- 50.48% (n = 8), whereas BIBP3226 significantly reduced the brain NO concentration to 69.63 +/- 8.84% (n = 8). [Leu(31),Pro(34)]-NPY (137.61 +/- 14.54%; n = 7) or NPY3-36 (129.23 +/- 21.77%; n = 8) did not affect the brain NO concentration at 15 min of MCAO. Our results suggest that the NPY-Y1 receptor activation mediates ischemic injury via NO overproduction and that inhibition of the Y1 receptor may confer protection via suppression of excessive NO production during ischemia.     

Feeding after fourth ventricular administration of neuropeptide Y receptor agonists in rats

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY) stimulate food intake after injection into the fourth cerebral ventricle, suggesting that NPY receptors in the hindbrain are targets for the stimulatory effect of these peptides on food intake. However, the NPY/PYY receptor subtype mediating the feeding response in the hindbrain is not known. To approach to this question we compared dose-effect of several NPY receptor agonists to stimulate food intake in freely-feeding rats 60- and 120-min after injection into the fourth cerebral ventricle. At the 120-min time point, PYY was 2- to 10-times as potent as NPY over the dose-response range and stimulated twice the total intake at the maximally effective dose (2-fold greater efficacy). NPY was 2-times as potent as the Y1, Y5 receptor agonist, [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY but acted with comparable efficacy. The Y5-, Y2-differentiating receptor agonist, NPY 2-36, was comparable in potency to PYY at low doses but equal in efficacy NPY and [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY. The Y2 receptor agonist, NPY 13-36, produced only a marginal effect on total food intake. The profile of agonist potency after fourth cerebral ventricle administration is similar to the profile obtained when these or related agonists are injected in the region of the hypothalamus. Agonists at both Y1 and Y5 receptors stimulated food intake with a rank order of potency that does not conclusively favor the exclusive involvement of a single known NPY receptor subtype. Thus it is possible that the ingestive effects of NPY and PYY are mediated by multiple or novel receptor subtypes in the hindbrain. And the relatively greater potency and efficacy of PYY raises the possibility that a novel PYY-preferring receptor in the hindbrain is involved in the stimulation of food intake.     

Evidence for neuropeptide Y mediation of eating produced by food deprivation and for a variant of the Y1 receptor mediating this peptide's effect.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) elicits eating when injected directly into the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) or perifornical hypothalamus (PFH). To identify the essential regions of the NPY molecule and the relative contributions of Y1 and Y2 receptors, the eating stimulatory potency of NPY was compared to that of its fragments, analogues, and agonists when injected into the PVN or PFH of satiated rats. Additionally, antisera to NPY was injected into the cerebral ventricles (ICV) to determine whether passive immunization suppresses the eating produced by mild food deprivation. Tests with NPY fragments revealed that NPY(2-36) was surprisingly potent, nearly three times more so than intact NPY. In contrast, fragments with further N-terminal deletions were progressively less effective or ineffective, as was the free acid form of NPY. Collectively, this suggests that both N- and C-terminal regions of NPY participate in the stimulation of eating. Tests with agonists revealed that the putative Y1 agonist [Pro34]NPY elicited a strong dose-dependent feeding response, while the putative Y2 agonist, C2-NPY, had only a small effect at the highest doses. Although this suggests mediation by Y1 receptors, the uncharacteristically high potency of NPY(2-36) may additionally suggest that the receptor subtype underlying feeding is distinct from that mediating other responses. Additional results revealed that ICV injection of antisera to NPY, which should inactivate endogenous NPY, produced a concentration-dependent suppression of eating induced by mild food deprivation. This finding, along with published work demonstrating enhanced levels of hypothalamic NPY in food-deprived rats, suggests that endogenous NPY mediates the eating produced by deprivation.     

Neuropeptide Y inhibits estrous behavior and stimulates feeding via separate receptors in Syrian hamsters

Central injections of neuropeptide Y (NPY) increase food intake in Syrian hamsters; however, the effect of NPY on sexual behavior in hamsters is not known nor are the receptor subtypes involved in feeding and sexual behaviors. We demonstrate that NPY inhibits lordosis duration in a dose-related fashion after lateral ventricular injection in ovariectomized, steroid-primed Syrian hamsters. Under the same conditions, we compared the effect of two receptor-differentiating agonists derived from peptide YY (PYY), PYY-(3-36) and [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY, on lordosis duration and food intake. PYY-(3-36) produced a 91% reduction in lordosis duration at 0.24 nmol. [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY was less potent, producing a reduction in lordosis duration (66%) only at 2.4 nmol. These results suggest NPY effects on estrous behavior are principally mediated by Y2 receptors. PYY-(3-36) and [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY stimulated comparable dose-related increases in total food intake (2 h), suggesting Y5 receptors are involved in feeding. The significance of different NPY receptor subtypes controlling estrous and feeding behavior is highlighted by results on expression of Fos immunoreactivity (Fos-IR) elicited by either PYY-(3-36) or [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY at a dose of each that differentiated between the two behaviors. Some differences were seen in the distribution of Fos-IR produced by the two peptides. Overall, however, the patterns of expression were similar. Our behavioral and anatomic results suggest that NPY-containing pathways controlling estrous and feeding behavior innervate similar nuclei, with the divergence in pathways controlling the separate behaviors characterized by linkage to different NPY receptor subtypes.     

Cardiorespiratory responses to intracerebroventricular injection of neuropeptide Y in anaesthetised dogs.

Cardiovascular and respiratory effects of intracerebroventricular (icv) administration of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and separate, preferential agonists for NPY Y1 and Y2 receptors were observed in anaesthetised dogs. Central injections of NPY resulted in significant cardiac slowing and decreases in arterial pressure. These cardiovascular effects were blocked by central injection of the NPY Y1- preferring antagonist 1229U91. Central injection of NPY did not have a significant effect on ventilation, but the NPY Y1 antagonist 1229U91 administered alone caused a significant increase in ventilation. The NPY Y1-receptor agonist [Leu31Pro34] NPY significantly decreased ventilation while the NPY Y2 receptor agonist N-acetyl [Leu28Leu31] NPY 24--36 significantly increased it. A similar inverse relationship was seen with respect to blood pressure, with the NPY Y1-receptor agonist [Leu31Pro34] NPY significantly decreasing blood pressure, while the NPY Y2 receptor agonist N-acetyl [Leu28Leu31] NPY 24-36 significantly increased it. These findings suggest a role for NPY Y1 receptors in pathways mediating decreases in ventilation and blood pressure, and for NPY Y2 receptors in those mediating increased ventilation and blood pressure.     

Regulation of food intake in the goldfish by interaction between ghrelin and orexin

Intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of ghrelin, orexin and neuropeptide Y (NPY) stimulates food intake in goldfish. Orexin and NPY interact with each other in the regulation of feeding, while ghrelin-induced feeding has also shown to be mediated by NPY in the goldfish model. To investigate the interaction between ghrelin and orexin, we examined the effects of a selective orexin receptor-1 antagonist, SB334867, and a growth hormone secretagogue-receptor antagonist, [D-Lys(3)]-GHRP-6, on ghrelin- and orexin-A-induced feeding. Ghrelin-induced food intake was completely inhibited for 1h following ICV preinjection of SB334867, while [D-Lys(3)]-GHRP-6 attenuated orexin-A stimulated feeding. Furthermore, ICV administration of ghrelin or orexin-A at a dose sufficient to stimulate food intake increased the expression of each other's mRNA in the diencephalon. These results indicate that, in goldfish, ghrelin and orexin-A have interacting orexigenic effects in the central nervous system. This is the first report that orexin-A-induced feeding is mediated by the ghrelin signaling in any animal model.     

Interaction of NPY compounds with the rat glucocorticoid-induced receptor (GIR) reveals similarity to the NPY-Y2 receptor

The rat glucocorticoid-induced receptor (rGIR) is an orphan G protein-coupled receptor awaiting pharmacological characterization. Among known receptors, rGIR exhibits highest sequence similarity to the neuropeptide Y (NPY)-Y(2) receptor (38-40%). The pharmacological profile of rGIR was investigated using (125)I-PYY(3-36), a Y(2)-preferring radioligand and several NPY analogs. rGIR displayed a similar displacement profile as reported for the Y(2) receptor, in that the Y(2)-selective C terminus fragments of NPY and PYY (NPY(3-36) and PYY(3-36)) showed high affinity binding and activation of rGIR (low nanomolar range). The rank order potency for displacement was NPY(3-36)>PYY(3-36)=NPY>NPY(13-36)>Ac, Leu NPY(24-36)>[D-Trp(32)]-NPY>Leu(31), Pro(34)-NPY=hPP. NPY and Y(2)-selective agonists NPY(3-36) and PYY(3-36) led to significant activation of (35)S-GTPgammaS binding to rGIR transfected cells. BIIE0246, a specific Y(2) antagonist, displaced (125)I-PYY(3-36) binding to rGIR with high affinity (95nM). Activation of (35)S-GTPgammaS binding by Y(2)-selective agonist in rGIR transfected cells was also completely abolished by BIIE0246. Our data report, for the first time, an interaction of NPY ligands with rGIR expressed in vitro, and indicate similarities between GIR and the NPY-Y(2) receptor.     

Increased brain neuropeptide Y1 and Y2 receptor binding in NPY knock out mice does not result in increased receptor function

The brain neuropeptide Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is an important modulator of a number of centrally mediated processes including feeding, anxiety-like behaviors, blood pressure and others. NPY produces its effects through at least four functional G-protein coupled receptors termed Y1, Y2, Y4 and Y5. In the brain, the Y1 and Y2 receptor subtypes are the predominant receptor population. To better understand the roles of NPY, genetically modified mice lacking NPY were produced but lacked the expected phenotypes. These mice have previously been reported to have a marked increase in Y2 receptor binding. In the present study, we found an upregulation of both Y1 and Y2 receptor binding and extended these findings to the female. These increases were as large as 10-fold or greater in many brain regions. To assess functional coupling of the receptors, we performed agonist-induced [(35)S]GTPgammaS autoradiography. In the mouse brain, the Y1/Y4/Y5 agonist Leu(31),Pro(34)-NPY increased [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding with a regional distribution consistent with that produced when labeling adjacent sections with [(125)I]-Leu(31),Pro(34)-PYY. In a few brain regions, minor increases were noted in the agonist-induced binding when comparing knock out mice to wild type. The Y2 agonist C2-NPY stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in numerous brain areas with a regional distribution similar to the binding observed with [(125)I]-PYY3-36. Again, no major increases were noted in the functional activation of Y2 receptors between knock out and wild type mice. Therefore, the increased Y1 and Y2 binding observed in the NPY knock out mice does not represent an increase in NPY receptor mediated signaling and is likely due to an increase in spare (uncoupled) receptors.     

Centrally administered neuropeptide Y delays gastric emptying via Y2 receptors in rats

It has been shown that centrally administered neuropeptide Y (NPY) delays gastric emptying. To determine the receptor subtypes of NPY mediating the inhibitory effects on gastric emptying, effects of intracerebroventricular injection of NPY, [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (a Y1 agonist) and NPY-(3-36) (a Y2 agonist) on solid gastric emptying and postprandial antropyloric motility were studied in conscious rats. Intracerebroventricular injection of NPY and NPY-(3-36), but not [Leu31,Pro34] NPY, delayed solid gastric emptying in a dose-dependent manner (0.03-3 nmol). After the feeding (40 min), contractions with low frequency and high amplitude of the antrum were frequently observed, and the peak contraction of the antrum occurred most often 3-6 s before the peak contraction of the pylorus. Intracerebroventricular injection of NPY and NPY-(3-36) (3 nmol), but not [Leu31,Pro34]NPY, significantly reduced antral contractions and the number of antropyloric coordination events. It is suggested that centrally administered NPY impairs postprandial antral contractions and antropyloric coordination via Y2 receptors, resulting in delayed gastric emptying.     

Regulation of food intake by neuropeptide Y in goldfish

In mammals, neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a potent orexigenic factor. In the present study, third brain ventricle (intracerebroventricular) injection of goldfish NPY (gNPY) caused a dose-dependent increase in food intake in goldfish, and intracerebroventricular administration of NPY Y1-receptor antagonist BIBP-3226 decreased food intake; the actions of gNPY were blocked by simultaneous injection of BIBP-3226. Goldfish maintained on a daily scheduled feeding regimen display an increase in NPY mRNA levels in the telencephalon-preoptic area and hypothalamus shortly before feeding; however, a decrease occured in optic tectum-thalamus. In both fed and unfed fish, brain NPY mRNA levels decreased after scheduled feeding. Restriction in daily food ration intake for 1 wk or food deprivation for 72 h resulted in increased brain NPY mRNA levels. Results from these studies demonstrate that NPY is a physiological brain signal involved in feeding behavior in goldfish, mediating its effects, at least in part, through Y1-like receptors in the brain.     

ICV NPY Y1 receptor agonist but not Y5 agonist induces torpor-like hypothermia in cold-acclimated Siberian hamsters

The reduced metabolism derived from daily torpor enables numerous small mammals, including Siberian hamsters, to survive periods of energetic challenge. Little is known of the neural mechanisms underlying the initiation and expression of torpor. Hypothalamic neuropeptide Y (NPY) contributes to surviving energetic challenges by both increasing food ingestion and reducing metabolic expenditure. Intracerebroventricular injections of NPY in cold-acclimated Siberian hamsters induce torpor-like hypothermia comparable to natural torpor. Multiple NPY receptor subtypes have been identified, and the Y1 receptor and Y5 receptor both contribute to the orexigenic effect of NPY. The purpose of this research was to compare and contrast the effects of Y1 receptor activation by a specific Y1 agonist ([D-Arg25]-NPY) or Y5 receptor activation by a specific Y5 agonist ([D-Trp34]-NPY) on body temperature and subsequent food intake in cold-acclimated Siberian hamsters. Intracerebroventricular injections of Y1 agonist produced torporlike hypothermia closely resembling that induced by intracerebroventricular NPY. The intracerebroventricular Y5 agonist infrequently produced hypothermia reaching criterion for torpor and that failed to resemble either NPY-induced or natural torpor. Combined injections of Y1 and Y5 agonists resulted in hypothermia comparable to Y5 agonist treatments alone, negating the mimicry of NPY treatment seen with Y1 agonist alone. Prior treatment with Y1 agonist or Y5 agonist surprisingly had lingering effects on NPY-induced torpor expression, Y1 agonist enhanced and Y5 agonist inhibited the effect of NPY. The ability of NPY to induce torporlike hypothermia, especially its initiation, most likely involves activation of the NPY Y1 receptor subtype.     

Nicotine evoked improvement in learning and memory is mediated through NPY Y1 receptors in rat model of Alzheimer's disease

We investigated the role of endogenous neuropeptide Y (NPY) system in nicotine-mediated improvement of learning and memory in rat model of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Intracerebroventricular (icv) colchicine treatment induced AD-like condition in rats and showed increased escape latency (decreased learning), and amnesic condition in probe test in Morris water maze. In these rats, nicotine (0.5mg/kg, intraperitoneal), NPY (100 ng/rat, icv) or NPY Y1 receptor agonist [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY (0.04 ng/rat, icv) decreased escape latency by 54.76%, 55.81% and 44.18%, respectively, on day 4 of the acquisition. On the other hand, selective NPY Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP3226 (icv) produced opposite effect (44.18%). In the probe test conducted at 24h time point, nicotine, NPY or [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY increased the time spent by 72.72%, 44.11% and 26.47%, respectively; while BIBP3226 caused reduction (8.82%). It seems that while NPY or [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY potentiated, BIBP3226 attenuated the learning and memory enhancing effects of nicotine. Brains of colchicine treated rats showed significant reduction in NPY-immunoreactivity in the nucleus accumbens shell (cells 62.23% and fibers 50%), bed nucleus of stria terminalis (fibers 71.58%), central nucleus of amygdala (cells 74.33%), arcuate nucleus (cells 70.97% and fibers 69.65%) and dentate gyrus (cells 58.54%). However, in these rats nicotine treatment for 4 days restored NPY-immunoreactivity to the control level. We suggest that NPY, perhaps acting via NPY Y1 receptors, might interact with the endogenous cholinergic system and play a role in improving the learning and memory processes in the rats with AD-like condition.     

Agonist internalization by cloned Y1 neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells shows strong preference for NPY,endosome-linked entry and fast receptor recycling

In Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the cloned guinea-pig Y1 receptor, the saturable, receptor-linked internalization of NPY (NPY)-related peptides showed the rank order of human/rat neuropeptide Y (hNPY)>pig/rat peptide YY (pPYY)>=(Pro(34))human PYY>(Leu(31),Pro(34))hNPY>(Leu(31),Pro(34))hPYY>BVD-11 (a selective Y1 antagonist). All agonists accessed similar numbers of Y1 sites in particulates from disrupted cells, with relatively small affinity variation. The rate of internalization could significantly depend on the overall interactivity of the agonist peptide (reflected in sensitivity to chaotropic agents, as well as in the level of non-saturable binding and internalization). Concentration-dependent inhibition of the agonist-driven CHO-Y1 internalization was found with filipin III (a cholesterol-complexing macrolide), and confirmed with inhibitors of clathrin lattice formation, phenylarsine oxide (PAO) and sucrose. In the concentration range affecting Y1 internalization, none of the above treatments or agents significantly alter agonist affinity for Y1 cell surface or particulate receptors. Largely similar responses to the above inhibitors were observed in CHO-Y1 cells for internalization of human transferrin. Internalization of CHO-Y1 receptor apparently is driven by NPY in strong preference to other naturally encountered agonists. At 37 degrees C, most of the internalized receptor is rapidly recycled through endosome-like membrane elements, detectable in Percoll gradients.     

Novel cell line selectively expressing neuropeptide Y-Y2 receptors

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) recognition by the human neuroblastoma cell lines SiMa, Kelly, SH-SY5Y, CHP-234, and MHH-NB-11 was analyzed in radioactive binding assays using tritiated NPY. For the cell lines CHP-234 and MHH-NB-11 binding of [3H]propionyl-NPY was observed with Kd-values of 0.64 +/- 0.07 nM and 0.53 +/- 0.12 nM, respectively, determined by saturation analysis with non-linear regression. The receptor subtype was determined by competition analysis using the subtype selective NPY analogues [Leu31, Pro34]-NPY (NPY-Y1, NPY-Y5), [Ahx(5-24)]-NPY (NPY-Y2), [Ala31, Aib32]-NPY (NPY-Y5), NPY [3-36] (NPY-Y2, NPY-Y5), and NPY [13-36] (NPY-Y2). Both cell lines, CHP-234 and MHH-NB-11, the latter one being characterized for NPY receptors for the first time, showed exclusive expression of NPY-Y2 receptors. In both cell lines binding of NPY induced signal transduction, which was monitored as reduction of forskolin-induced cAMP production in an ELISA.     

Key motif to gain selectivity at the neuropeptide Y5-receptor: structure and dynamics of micelle-bound [Ala31, Pro32]-NPY

The structure of [Ala(31), Pro(32)]-NPY, a neuropeptide Y mutant with selectivity for the NPY Y(5)-receptor (Cabrele, C., Wieland, H. A., Stidsen, C., Beck-Sickinger, A. G., (2002) Biochemistry XX, XXXX-XXXX (companion paper)), has been characterized in the presence of the membrane mimetic dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) micelles using high-resolution NMR techniques. The overall topology closely resembles the fold of the previously described Y(5)-receptor-selective agonist [Ala(31), Aib(32)]-NPY (Cabrele, C., Langer, M., Bader, R., Wieland, H. A., Doods, H. N., Zerbe, O., and Beck-Sickinger, A. G. (2000) J. Biol. Chem 275, 36043-36048). Similar to wild-type neuropeptide Y (NPY) and [Ala(31), Aib(32)]-NPY, the N-terminal residues Tyr(1)-Asp(16) are disordered in solution. Starting from residue Leu(17), an alpha helix extends toward the C-terminus. The decreased density of medium-range NOEs for the C-terminal residues resulting in larger RMSD values for the backbone atoms of Ala(31)-Tyr(36) indicates that the alpha helix has become interrupted through the [Ala(31), Pro(32)] mutation. This finding is further supported by (15)N-relaxation data through which we can demonstrate that the well-defined alpha helix is restricted to residues 17-31, with the C-terminal tetrapeptide displaying increased flexibility as compared to NPY. Surprisingly, increased generalized order parameter as well as decreased (3)J(HN)(alpha) scalar coupling constants reveal that the central helix is stabilized in comparison to wild-type NPY. Micelle-integrating spin labels were used to probe the mode of association of the helix with the membrane mimetic. The Y(5)-receptor-selective mutant and NPY share a similar orientation, which is parallel to the lipid surface. However, signal reductions due to efficient electron, nuclear spin relaxation were much less pronounced for the surface-averted residues in [Ala(31), Pro(32)]-NPY when compared to wild-type DPC-bound NPY. Only the signals of residues Asn(29) and Leu(30) were significantly more reduced in the mutant. The postulation of a different membrane binding mode of [Ala(31), Pro(32)]-NPY is further supported by the faster H/D exchange at the C-terminal amide protons. We conclude that arginine residues 33 and 35, which are believed to be directly involved in forming contacts to acidic receptor residues at the membrane-water interface, are no longer fixed in a well-defined conformation close to the membrane surface in [Ala(31), Pro(32)]-NPY.     

Substance P and NPY differentially potentiate ATP and adrenergic stimulated vasopressin and oxytocin release

The supraoptic nuclei are innervated by the A1 neurons of the caudal ventrolateral medulla. Substances colocalized in the A1 terminals include norepinephrine (NE), substance P (SP), ATP, and neuropeptide Y (NPY). ATP, acting at P(2x) receptors, caused rapid and unsustained stimulation of vasopressin (VP) and oxytocin (OT) release from perifused explants of the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system. SP elicited a concentration-dependent stimulation of VP and OT release that was large and sustained compared with other stimuli. ATP, but not phenylephrine (PE, alpha(1)-adrenergic agonist), augmented the response to SP (1 microM). In contrast, NPY did not alter basal nor ATP-induced VP or OT release, but it did cause sustained potentiation of PE-induced VP and OT release. The Y(1)-agonist, [Leu(31),Pro(34)]-NPY, increased VP and OT release, suggesting that the ineffectiveness of NPY reflects opposing actions at pre- and postsynaptic receptors. However, [Leu(31),Pro(34)]-NPY did not potentiate hormone responses to ATP or PE. The differential responses to these colocalized neurotransmitters and neuropeptides illustrate the range of potential responses that stimulation of this pathway might elicit from supraoptic neurons.     

Neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor mediated mesenteric vasoconstriction in the pig in vivo

The object of the present study was to investigate the effects of the sympathetic cotransmitter neuropeptide Y (NPY), and the closely related gut hormone peptide YY (PYY), on splanchnic blood flow regulation in the anaesthetized pig in vivo. Systemic injections of NPY, PYY and the NPY Y(1) receptor agonist [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY (470 pmol kg(-1) each) evoked pressor and mesenteric vasoconstrictor responses that were largely abolished by the selective NPY Y(1) receptor antagonist H 409/22 (60 nmol kg(-1) min(-1)). In contrast, the NPY Y(2) receptor agonist N-acetyl[Leu(28)Leu(31)]NPY(24-36) (1.1 nmol kg(-1)), a dose of which potently evoked splenic NPY Y(2) receptor mediated (not affected by H 409/22) vasoconstriction, did not evoke any mesenteric vascular response. Mesenteric vascular responses to angiotensin II (10 pmol kg(-1)), alpha,beta-methylene ATP (10 nmol kg(-1)) and the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine (15 nmol kg(-1)), were not inhibited by H 409/22. It is concluded that NPY and PYY evokes porcine mesenteric vasoconstriction mediated by the NPY Y(1) receptor subtype, as demonstrated by selective and specific inhibition exerted by the NPY Y(1) receptor antagonist H 409/22, in vivo.