Rejection of skin allografts by CD4+ T cells is antigen-specific and requires expression of target alloantigen on Ia- epidermal cells

The effector mechanism of skin allograft rejection has been characterized as Ag specific, rejecting cells that express the target alloantigen but sparing those that do not. However, the rejection of MHC class II disparate skin grafts, in which very few cells (Langerhans cells) actually express the target Ia Ag could conceivably proceed by either one of two distinct rejection mechanisms. One possibility is that Ia- cells are destroyed by a sequence of events in which CD4+ T cells, activated by Ia+ LC, elaborate soluble factors that are either directly cytolytic or that recruit and activate non-specific effector cells. The alternative possibility is that activated CD4+ T cells elaborate soluble factors which induce Ia expression on Ia- cell populations, and that these Ia+ cells are subsequently destroyed by effector cells specific for the induced Ia alloantigens. We found that rejection of Ia+ LC was not of itself sufficient to cause rejection of skin grafts, indicating that skin allograft rejection is contingent on the destruction not only of LC but of other graft cell populations as well. We then investigated whether CD4+ T cells rejected allogeneic skin grafts in an antigen specific fashion. To do so, we engrafted immunoincompetent H-2b nude mice with trunk skin grafts from B6----A/J allophenic mice because such skin is composed of mutually exclusive cell populations expressing either H-2a or H-2b histocompatibility Ag, but not both. The engrafted mice were subsequently reconstituted with H-2b CD4+ T cells. The CD4+ T cells destroyed keratinocytes of A/J origin but spared keratinocytes of B6 origin, even though neither cell population constitutively expresses target IAk alloantigen. The targeted rejection of A/J keratinocytes but not of B6 keratinocytes indicates that the target Ia alloantigen must have been induced on Ia- A/J keratinocytes, rendering them susceptible to destruction by anti-Iak-specific CD4+ effector cells. These data demonstrate that CD4+ T cell rejection of skin allografts is mediated by Ag-specific CD4+ cytolytic T cells and hence, requires the induction of target Ia alloantigens on epidermal cells within the graft.     

Tolerance to antigen-presenting cell-depleted islet allografts is CD4 T cell dependent

Pretreatment of pancreatic islets in 95% oxygen culture depletes graft-associated APCs and leads to indefinite allograft acceptance in immunocompetent recipients. As such, the APC-depleted allograft represents a model of peripheral alloantigen presentation in the absence of donor-derived costimulation. Over time, a state of donor-specific tolerance develops in which recipients are resistant to donor APC-induced graft rejection. Thus, persistence of the graft is sufficient to induce tolerance independent of other immune interventions. Donor-specific tolerance could be adoptively transferred to immune-deficient SCID recipient mice transplanted with fresh immunogenic islet allografts, indicating that the original recipient was not simply "ignorant" of donor antigens. Interestingly, despite the fact that the original islet allograft presented only MHC class I alloantigens, CD8+ T cells obtained from tolerant animals readily collaborated with naive CD4+ T cells to reject donor-type islet grafts. Conversely, tolerant CD4+ T cells failed to collaborate effectively with naive CD8+ T cells for the rejection of donor-type grafts. In conclusion, the MHC class I+, II- islet allograft paradoxically leads to a change in the donor-reactive CD4 T cell subset and not in the CD8 subset. We hypothesize that the tolerant state is not due to direct class I alloantigen presentation to CD8 T cells but, rather, occurs via the indirect pathway of donor Ag presentation to CD4 T cells in the context of host MHC class II molecules.     

Skin allograft maintenance in a new synchimeric model system of tolerance.

Treatment of mice with a single donor-specific transfusion plus a brief course of anti-CD154 mAb uniformly induces donor-specific transplantation tolerance characterized by the deletion of alloreactive CD8+ T cells. Survival of islet allografts in treated mice is permanent, but skin grafts eventually fail unless recipients are thymectomized. To analyze the mechanisms underlying tolerance induction, maintenance, and failure in euthymic mice we created a new analytical system based on allo-TCR-transgenic hemopoietic chimeric graft recipients. Chimeras were CBA (H-2(k)) mice engrafted with small numbers of syngeneic TCR-transgenic KB5 bone marrow cells. These mice subsequently circulated a self-renewing trace population of anti-H-2(b)-alloreactive CD8+ T cells maturing in a normal microenvironment. With this system, we studied the maintenance of H-2(b) allografts in tolerized mice. We documented that alloreactive CD8+ T cells deleted during tolerance induction slowly returned toward pretreatment levels. Skin allograft rejection in this system occurred in the context of 1) increasing numbers of alloreactive CD8+ cells; 2) a decline in anti-CD154 mAb concentration to levels too low to inhibit costimulatory functions; and 3) activation of the alloreactive CD8+ T cells during graft rejection following deliberate depletion of regulatory CD4+ T cells. Rejection of healed-in allografts in tolerized mice appears to be a dynamic process dependent on the level of residual costimulation blockade, CD4+ regulatory cells, and activated alloreactive CD8+ thymic emigrants that have repopulated the periphery after tolerization.     

An essential contribution by IFN-gamma to CD8+ T cell-mediated rejection of pancreatic islet allografts

CD8+ T cells have long been considered to be the prototypical cytotoxic lymphocyte subpopulation. However, whether alloreactive CD8+ T cells require traditional cytolytic pathways such as perforin and Fas ligand (FasL) to mediate graft rejection has been a controversial issue. In the present studies, we examined the role of varied effector pathways in CD8+ T cell-mediated rejection of pancreatic islet allografts. Our goal was to systematically determine the relative requirements, if any, of perforin and FasL as well as the proinflammatory cytokine IFN-gamma in triggering graft destruction. To study CD8+ T cell effector pathways independently of other lymphocyte populations, purified alloreactive CD8+ T cells were adoptively transferred into severe combined immune-deficient (SCID) recipients bearing established islet allografts. Results indicate that to reject established islet allografts, primed CD8+ T cells do not require the individual action of the conventional cytotoxic effectors perforin and Fas ligand. In contrast, the ability to produce IFN-gamma is critical for efficient CD8+ T cell-mediated rejection of established islet allografts. Furthermore, alloreactive CD8+ TCR transgenic T cells (2C) also show IFN-gamma dependence for mediating islet allograft rejection in vivo. We speculate from these results that the production of IFN-gamma by alloreactive CD8+ T cells is a rate-limiting step in the process of islet allograft rejection.     

Impaired recall of CD8 memory T cells in immunologically privileged tissue

Foreign Ags that enter immunologically privileged sites such as the eye, brain, and testis persist for an extended period of time, whereas the same Ags are rapidly eliminated at conventional sites. Immune privilege, therefore, provides unwanted refuge for pathogens and tumor cells but is beneficial for the survival of allogeneic grafts. In this study, we asked whether memory T cells can eliminate foreign Ags deposited at an immunologically privileged site by studying CD8 memory T cell-mediated rejection of pancreatic islet allografts placed either in the testis (a privileged organ) or under the kidney capsule (a nonprivileged site) of diabetic mice. We found that CD8 memory T cells reject intratesticular grafts at a significantly slower rate than the rejection of intrarenal grafts. Delayed graft rejection in the testis was not due to reduced homing or proliferation of memory T cells but due to their increased apoptosis at that site. Apoptosis was mediated by the combined actions of two TNFR family members that are up-regulated on activated memory T cells, Fas, and CD30. Therefore, memory T cells survey immunologically privileged tissues but are subject to the immunosuppressive mechanisms present at these sites.     

Role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in allorecognition: lessons from corneal transplantation

Corneal transplantation represents an interesting model to investigate the contribution of direct vs indirect Ag recognition pathways to the alloresponse. Corneal allografts are naturally devoid of MHC class II+ APCs. In addition, minor Ag-mismatched corneal grafts are more readily rejected than their MHC-mismatched counterparts. Accordingly, it has been hypothesized that these transplants do not trigger direct T cell alloresponse, but that donor Ags are presented by host APCs, i.e., in an indirect fashion. Here, we have determined the Ag specificity, frequency, and phenotype of T cells activated through direct and indirect pathways in BALB/c mice transplanted orthotopically with fully allogeneic C57BL/6 corneas. In this combination, only 60% of the corneas are rejected, while the remainder enjoy indefinite graft survival. In rejecting mice the T cell response was mediated by two T cell subsets: 1) CD4+ T cells that recognize alloantigens exclusively through indirect pathway and secrete IL-2, and 2) IFN-gamma-producing CD8+ T cells recognizing donor MHC in a direct fashion. Surprisingly, CD8+ T cells activated directly were not required for graft rejection. In nonrejecting mice, no T cell responses were detected. Strikingly, peripheral sensitization to allogeneic MHC molecules in these mice induced acute rejection of corneal grafts. We conclude that only CD4+ T cells activated via indirect allorecognition have the ability to reject allogeneic corneal grafts. Although alloreactive CD8+ T cells are activated via the direct pathway, they are not fully competent and cannot contribute to the rejection unless they receive an additional signal provided by professional APCs in the periphery.     

Induction of alloreactive CD4 T cell tolerance in molecular chimeras: a possible role for regulatory T cells

Induction of molecular chimerism following reconstitution of mice with autologous bone marrow cells expressing a retrovirally encoded allogeneic MHC class I Ag results in donor-specific tolerance. To investigate the mechanism by which CD4 T cells that recognize allogeneic MHC class I through the indirect pathway of Ag presentation are rendered tolerant in molecular chimeras, transgenic mice expressing a TCR on CD4 T cells specific for peptides derived from K(b) were used. CD4 T cells expressing the transgenic TCR were detected in mice reconstituted with bone marrow cells transduced with retroviruses carrying the gene encoding H-2K(b), albeit detection was at lower levels than in mice receiving mock-transduced bone marrow. Despite the presence of CD4 T cells expressing an alloreactive TCR, mice receiving H-2K(b)-transduced bone marrow permanently accepted K(b) disparate skin grafts. CD4+CD25+ T cells from mice reconstituted with H-2K(b)-transduced bone marrow prevented rejection of K(b) disparate skin grafts when adoptively transferred into immunodeficient mice along with effector T cells, suggesting that induction of molecular chimerism leads to the generation of donor specific regulatory T cells, which may be involved in preventing alloreactive CD4 T cell responses that lead to rejection.     

Regulatory T cells induced by 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and mycophenolate mofetil treatment mediate transplantation tolerance

1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, the active form of vitamin D3, and mycophenolate mofetil, a selective inhibitor of T and B cell proliferation, modulate APC function and induce dendritic cells (DCs) with a tolerogenic phenotype. Here we show that a short treatment with these agents induces tolerance to fully mismatched mouse islet allografts that is stable to challenge with donor-type spleen cells and allows acceptance of donor-type vascularized heart grafts. Peritransplant macrophages and DCs from tolerant mice express down-regulated CD40, CD80, and CD86 costimulatory molecules. In addition, DCs from the graft area of tolerant mice secrete, upon stimulation with CD4+ cells, 10-fold lower levels of IL-12 compared with DCs from acutely rejecting mice, and induce a CD4+ T cell response characterized by selective abrogation of IFN-gamma production. CD4+ but not CD8+ or class II+ cells from tolerant mice, transferred into naive syngeneic recipients, prevent rejection of donor-type islet grafts. Graft acceptance is associated with impaired development of IFN-gamma-producing type 1 CD4+ and CD8+ cells and an increased percentage of CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells expressing CD152 in the spleen and in the transplant-draining lymph node. Transfer of CD4+CD25+ cells from tolerant but not naive mice protects 100% of the syngeneic recipients from islet allograft rejection. These results demonstrate that a short treatment with immunosuppressive agents, such as 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3/mycophenolate mofetil, induces tolerance to islet allografts associated with an increased frequency of CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells that can adoptively transfer transplantation tolerance.     

Absence of recipient CCR5 promotes early and increased allospecific antibody responses to cardiac allografts

Acute rejection is mediated by T cell infiltration of allografts, but mechanisms mediating the delayed rejection of allografts in chemokine receptor-deficient recipients remain unclear. The rejection of vascularized, MHC-mismatched cardiac allografts by CCR5(-/-) recipients was investigated. Heart grafts from A/J (H-2(a)) donors were rejected by wild-type C57BL/6 (H-2(b)) recipients on day 8-10 posttransplant vs day 8-11 by CCR5(-/-) recipients. When compared with grafts from wild-type recipients, however, significant decreases in CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and macrophages were observed in rejecting allografts from CCR5-deficient recipients. These decreases were accompanied by significantly lower numbers of alloreactive T cells developing to IFN-gamma-, but not IL-4-producing cells in the CCR5(-/-) recipients, suggesting suboptimal priming of T cells in the knockout recipients. CCR5 was more prominently expressed on activated CD4(+) than CD8(+) T cells in the spleens of allograft wild-type recipients and on CD4(+) T cells infiltrating the cardiac allografts. Rejecting cardiac allografts from wild-type recipients had low level deposition of C3d that was restricted to the graft vessels. Rejecting allografts from CCR5(-/-) recipients had intense C3d deposition in the vessels as well as on capillaries throughout the graft parenchyma similar to that observed during rejection in donor-sensitized recipients. Titers of donor-reactive Abs in the serum of CCR5(-/-) recipients were almost 20-fold higher than those induced in wild-type recipients, and the high titers appeared as early as day 6 posttransplant. These results suggest dysregulation of alloreactive Ab responses and Ab-mediated cardiac allograft rejection in the absence of recipient CCR5.     

Disparate primary and secondary allospecific CD8+ T cell cytolytic effector function in the presence or absence of host CD4+ T cells

The role of CD4+ T cells in promoting CD8+ T cell effector activity in response to transplant Ags in vivo has not been reported. We used a hepatocellular allograft model known to initiate both CD4-dependent and CD4-independent rejection responses to investigate the contribution of CD4+ T cells to the development, function, and persistence of allospecific CD8+ T cell effectors in vivo. Complete MHC-mismatched hepatocellular allografts were transplanted into C57BL/6 (CD4-sufficient) or CD4 knockout (CD4-deficient) hosts. The development of in vivo allospecific cytotoxicity was determined by clearance of CFSE-labeled target cells. CD8+ T cell cytotoxic effector activity was enhanced in response to allogeneic hepatocellular grafts with a greater magnitude of allocytotoxicity and a prolonged persistence of CTL effector activity in CD4-sufficient hosts compared with CD4-deficient hosts. Cytolytic activity was mediated by CD8+ T cells in both recipient groups. In response to a second hepatocyte transplant, rejection kinetics were enhanced in both CD4-sufficient and CD4-deficient hepatocyte recipients. However, only CD4-sufficient hosts developed recall CTL responses with an augmented magnitude and persistence of allocytotoxicity in comparison with primary CTL responses. These studies show important functional differences between alloreactive CD8+ T cell cytolytic effectors that mature in vivo in the presence or absence of CD4+ T cells.     

Antibody-mediated rejection of cardiac allografts in CCR5-deficient recipients

Rejected MHC-mismatched cardiac allografts in CCR5(-/-) recipients have low T cell infiltration, but intense deposition of C3d in the large vessels and capillaries of the graft, characteristics of Ab-mediated rejection. The roles of donor-specific Ab and CD4 and CD8 T cell responses in the rejection of complete MHC-mismatched heart grafts by CCR5(-/-) recipients were directly investigated. Wild-type C57BL/6 and B6.CCR5(-/-) (H-2(b)) recipients of A/J (H-2(a)) cardiac allografts had equivalent numbers of donor-reactive CD4 T cells producing IFN-gamma, whereas CD4 T cells producing IL-4 were increased in CCR5(-/-) recipients. Numbers of donor-reactive CD8 T cells producing IFN-gamma were reduced 60% in CCR5(-/-) recipients. Day 8 posttransplant serum titers of donor-specific Ab were 15- to 25-fold higher in CCR5(-/-) allograft recipients, and transfer of this serum provoked cardiac allograft rejection in RAG-1(-/-) recipients within 14 days, whereas transfer of either serum from wild-type recipients or immune serum from CCR5-deficient recipients diluted to titers observed in wild-type recipients did not mediate this rejection. Wild-type C57BL/6 and B6.CCR5(-/-) recipients rejected A/J cardiac grafts by day 11, whereas rejection was delayed (day 12-60, mean 21 days) in muMT(-/-)/CCR5(-/-) recipients. These results indicate that the donor-specific Ab produced in CCR5(-/-) heart allograft recipients is sufficient to directly mediate graft rejection, and the absence of recipient CCR5 expression has differential effects on the priming of alloreactive CD4 and CD8 T cells.     

MHC-mismatched islet allografts are vulnerable to autoimmune recognition in vivo

When transplanted into type 1a diabetic recipients, islet allografts are subject both to conventional allograft immunity and, presumably, to recurrent autoimmune (islet-specific) pathogenesis. Importantly, CD4 T cells play a central role both in islet allograft rejection and in autoimmune disease recurrence leading to the destruction of syngeneic islet transplants in diabetic NOD mice. However, it is unclear how NOD host MHC class II (I-A(g7))-restricted, autoreactive CD4 T cells may also contribute to the recognition of allogeneic islet grafts that express disparate MHC class II molecules. We hypothesized that islet-specific CD4 T cells can target MHC-mismatched islet allografts for destruction via the "indirect" (host APC-dependent) pathway of Ag recognition. To test this hypothesis, we determined whether NOD-derived, islet-specific CD4 T cells (BDC-2.5 TCR transgenic cells) could damage MHC-mismatched islets in vivo independent of conventional allograft immunity. Results demonstrate that BDC-2.5 CD4 T cells can vigorously destroy MHC class II-disparate islet allografts established in NOD.scid recipients. Tissue injury is tissue-specific in that BDC-2.5 T cells destroy donor-type islet, but not thyroid allografts established in the same NOD.scid recipient. Furthermore, BDC-2.5 CD4 T cells acutely destroy MHC class II-deficient islet allografts in vivo, indicating that autoimmune pathogenesis can be completely independent of donor MHC class II expression. Taken together, these findings indicate that MHC-mismatched islet allografts can be vulnerable to autoimmune pathogenesis triggered by autoreactive CD4 T cells, presumably through indirect autoantigen recognition in vivo.     

Alloreactive T cell responses and acute rejection of single class II MHC-disparate heart allografts are under strict regulation by CD4+ CD25+ T cells

Skin but not vascularized cardiac allografts from B6.H-2bm12 mice are acutely rejected by C57BL/6 recipients in response to the single class II MHC disparity. The underlying mechanisms preventing acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts by C57BL/6 recipients were investigated. B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts induced low levels of alloreactive effector T cell priming in C57BL/6 recipients, and this priming was accompanied by low-level cellular infiltration into the allograft that quickly resolved. Recipients with long-term-surviving heart allografts were unable to reject B6.H-2bm12 skin allografts, suggesting potential down-regulatory mechanisms induced by the cardiac allografts. Depletion of CD25+ cells from C57BL/6 recipients resulted in 15-fold increases in alloreactive T cell priming and in acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 heart grafts. Similarly, reconstitution of B6.Rag(-/-) recipients with wild-type C57BL/6 splenocytes resulted in acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 heart grafts only if CD25+ cells were depleted. These results indicate that acute rejection of single class II MHC-disparate B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts by C57BL/6 recipients is inhibited by the emergence of CD25+ regulatory cells that restrict the clonal expansion of alloreactive T cells.     

Differential susceptibility of allogeneic targets to indirect CD4 immunity generates split tolerance

CD4 T cells frequently help to activate CD8 T and B cells that effect transplant rejection. However, CD4 T cells alone can reject transplants, either directly or indirectly. The relative effectiveness of indirect CD4 immunity in rejecting different types of allogeneic grafts is unknown. To address this, we used a TCR transgenic mouse model in which indirect CD4 alloimmunity alone can be studied. We challenged transgenic recipients with hematopoietic cells and shortly thereafter skin transplants that could only be rejected indirectly, and observed Ag-specific indirect donor B cell and skin rejection, but not T cell elimination, reflecting a state of split tolerance. Deficiency of indirect CD4 alloimmunity in donor T cell rejection was also apparent when acute indirect rejection of donor islets occurred despite generation and maintenance of mixed T cell chimerism, due to migration of the few passenger T cells into recipient circulation. Although passenger lymphocytes delayed indirect islet rejection, they enhanced rejection by a full repertoire capable of both direct and indirect reactivity. Interestingly, the persistence of chimerism was associated with the eventual development of tolerance, as demonstrated by acceptance of donor skin grafts given late to hematopoietic cell recipients, and hyporesponsiveness of transgenic T cells from islet recipients in vitro. Mechanistically, tolerance was recessive and associated with progressive down-regulation of CD4. Collectively, our data indicate that indirect CD4 immunity is not equally destructive toward different types of allogeneic grafts, the deficiency of which generates split tolerance. The futility of these responses can convert immunity into tolerance.     

Blocking the common gamma-chain of cytokine receptors induces T cell apoptosis and long-term islet allograft survival

The common gammac-chain is an essential signaling component shared by all known T cell growth factor (TCGF) receptors (i.e., IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, and IL-15). In the present study, we have studied the effect of gammac-chain blockade on T cell activation and allograft rejection. Treatment of B6AF1 (H-2b/d.k) recipient mice with anti-gammac mAbs induced long-term survival of DBA/2 (H-2d) islet allografts (>150 days, n = 8), whereas control Ab-treated mice rejected the islet allografts within 17 days (n = 6). The state of engraftment induced by the anti-gammac mAbs was remarkably stable, as recipient mice bearing the primary islet allografts accepted a second DBA/2 islet allograft without further immunosuppression and systemic administration of high doses of IL-2Ig fusion protein failed to provoke rejection. Blocking the gammac-chain inhibited T cell proliferation and induced T cell apoptosis by repressing expression of Bcl-2. Our data suggest that one means of inducing T cell apoptosis and stable allograft survival can be achieved via gammac-chain blockade.     

A novel receptor on allograft (H-2d)-induced macrophage (H-2b) toward an allogeneic major histocompatibility complex class I molecule, H-2Dd, in mice

The generation of knockout mice demonstrated that noncytotoxic CD4(+), but not cytotoxic CD8(+), T cells were essential for the rejection of skin or organ allografts. Earlier we reported that allograftinduced macrophages (AIM) in mice lysed allografts with H-2 haplotype specificity, implying screening of grafts by AIM. Here, we isolated a cDNA clone encoding a novel receptor on AIM (H-2D(b)) for an allogeneic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecule, H-2D(d), by using H-2D(d) tetramer and a monoclonal antibody (mAb; R15) specific for AIM. The cDNA (1,181-bp) encoded a 342-amino acid polypeptide with a calculated molecular mass of 45 kDa and was found to be expressed on AIM, but not on resident macrophages or other cells, infiltrating into the rejection site. HEK293T cells transfected with this cDNA reacted with R15 mAb and H-2D(d), but not H-2L(d), H-2K(d), H-2D(b), H-2K(b), H-2D(k), or H-2K(k), molecules; and the H-2D(d) binding was suppressed by the addition of R15 or anti-H-2D(d) mAb. AIM yielded a specific saturation isotherm in the presence of increasing concentrations of H-2D(d), but not H-2D(b) or H-2D(k), molecules. The dissociation constant of AIM toward H-2D(d) tetramers was 1.9 x 10(-9) M ; and the binding was completely inhibited by the addition of R15 or anti-H-2D(d) mAb. These results reveal that a novel receptor for an allogeneic H-2D(d) molecule was induced on effector macrophages responsible for allograft (H-2(d)) rejection in H-2(b) mice.     

Electrokinetic behaviour of subpopulations of T lymphocytes in allografted mice.

In AKR(H-2k) mice transplanted with DBA/2(H-2d) skin grafts, the mean electrophoretic mobilities (EPM) of total lymph node cells (LNC) and T cells were significantly reduced. Subpopulations of T lymphocytes, viz. CD4- (CD8- (CD4+) T cells were obtained by depletion treatment of T cells with monoclonal antibodies specific for these surface antigens and complement. Determination of EPM of these two subpopulations revealed that the electrokinetic change following immunostimulation equally afflicted these two subpopulations. These data thus confirmed that CD4+ as well as CD8+ T cells were activated in MHC unmatched allograft rejection.     

Differential susceptibility of heart, skin, and islet allografts to T cell-mediated rejection

Although it is widely accepted that there is a hierarchy in the susceptibility of different allografts to rejection, the mechanisms responsible are unknown. We show that the increased susceptibility of H-2K(b+) skin and islet allografts to rejection is not based on their ability to activate more H-2K(b)-specific T cells in vivo; heart allografts stimulate the activation and proliferation of many more H-2K(b)-specific T cells than either skin or islet allografts. Rejection of all three types of graft generate memory cells by 25 days posttransplant. These data provide evidence that neither tissue-specific Ags nor, surprisingly, the number of APCs carried in the graft dictate their susceptibility to T cell-mediated rejection and suggest that the graft microenvironment and size may play a more important role in determining the susceptibility of an allograft to rejection and resistance to tolerance induction.     

Absence of allograft ICAM-1 attenuates alloantigen-specific T cell priming,but not primed T cell trafficking into the graft,to mediate acute rejection

The expression and function of ICAM-1 are critical components in the initiation and elicitation of many T cell-mediated responses. Whether ICAM-1 expression is required on the T cells or on the APC during T cell priming remains unclear. To address this issue in alloantigen-specific T cell activation, the priming and function of T cells in response to heart allografts from MHC-mismatched wild-type vs ICAM-1(-/-) donors were tested. Wild-type C57BL/6 (H-2(b)) heart allografts were rejected by A/J (H-2(a)) recipients on days 7-9, whereas B6.ICAM-1(-/-) allografts survived until days 18-23 post-transplant. On day 7 post-transplant, infiltrating macrophages and CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in the ICAM-1(-/-) allografts were 20-30% those observed in the wild-type allografts. ELISPOT analyses indicated that the number of alloantigen-specific T cells producing IFN-gamma from recipients of ICAM-1-deficient grafts was 60% lower than that from recipients of wild-type allografts. On day 16 post-transplant, these numbers did not markedly increase in ICAM-1-deficient allograft recipients. Consistent with the reduced priming of alloreactive T cells, isolated dendritic cells from ICAM-1(-/-) mice stimulated allogeneic T cell proliferation poorly compared with wild-type dendritic cells. When A/J mice were primed with wild-type dendritic cells and then received wild-type or ICAM-1-deficient heart allografts 3 days later, the primed recipients rejected the wild-type and ICAM-1(-/-) allografts on days 5-6 post-transplant. These results indicate that optimal priming of alloreactive T cells requires allograft expression of ICAM-1, but, once primed, recipient T cell infiltration into the allograft is independent of graft ICAM-1 expression.