Comparative analysis of SET domain proteins in maize and Arabidopsis reveals multiple duplications preceding the divergence of monocots and dicots

Histone proteins play a central role in chromatin packaging, and modification of histones is associated with chromatin accessibility. SET domain [Su(var)3-9, Enhancer-of-zeste, Trithorax] proteins are one class of proteins that have been implicated in regulating gene expression through histone methylation. The relationships of 22 SET domain proteins from maize (Zea mays) and 32 SET domain proteins from Arabidopsis were evaluated by phylogenetic analysis and domain organization. Our analysis reveals five classes of SET domain proteins in plants that can be further divided into 19 orthology groups. In some cases, such as the Enhancer of zeste-like and trithorax-like proteins, plants and animals contain homologous proteins with a similar organization of domains outside of the SET domain. However, a majority of plant SET domain proteins do not have an animal homolog with similar domain organization, suggesting that plants have unique mechanisms to establish and maintain chromatin states. Although the domains present in plant and animal SET domain proteins often differ, the domains found in the plant proteins have been generally implicated in protein-protein interactions, indicating that most SET domain proteins operate in complexes. Combined analysis of the maize and Arabidopsis SET domain proteins reveals that duplication of SET domain proteins in plants is extensive and has occurred via multiple mechanisms that preceded the divergence of monocots and dicots.     

Identification of a novel domain--DIM, which defines a new family composed mainly of bacterial membrane proteins

We report here the identification of a novel domain - DIM (N-terminal domain in bacterial membrane proteins and other proteins) present exclusively in bacterial species including mycobacteria, revealed by PSI-BLAST iterative searches. DIM comprises about 53 amino acids in length with conserved Leu, Ile and Gly residues. Secondary structure prediction indicated that this domain contains two alpha-helices. DIM occurs at the N-terminus of proteins, and was found particularly but not exclusively in proteins with a transmembrane domain, and also in proteins with a FHA domain or RPT repeats. DIM-containing proteins have been reported to be involved in pathogenicity, signal transduction or small solute transport.     

Evolution of double MutT/Nudix domain-containing proteins: similar domain architectures from independent gene duplication-fusion events

The MutT/Nudix superfamily proteins repair DNA damage and play a role in human health and disease. In this study, we examined two different cases of double MutT/Nudix domain-containing proteins from eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Firstly, these double domain proteins were discovered in Drosophila, but only single Nudix domain proteins were found in other animals. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the protein sequence of Nudix_N and Nudix_C from Drosophila, and Nudix from other animals. The phylogenetic analysis suggested that the double Nudix domain proteins might have undergone a gene duplication-speciation-fusion process. Secondly, two genes of the MutT family, DR0004 and DR0329, were fused by two mutT gene segments and formed double MutT domain protein genes in Deinococcus radiodurans. The evolutionary tree of bacterial MutT proteins suggested that the double MutT domain proteins in D. radiodurans probably resulted from a gene duplication-fusion event after speciation. Gene duplication-fusion is a basic and important gene innovation mechanism for the evolution of double MutT/Nudix domain proteins. Independent gene duplication-fusion events resuited in similar domain architectures of different double MutT/Nudix domain proteins.     

Evolution of double MutT/Nudix domain-containing proteins: similar domain architectures from independent gene duplication-fusion events

The MutT/Nudix superfamily proteins repair DNA damage and play a role in human health and disease. In this study, we examined two different cases of double MutT/Nudix domain-containing proteins from eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Firstly, these double domain proteins were discovered in Drosophila, but only single Nudix domain proteins were found in other animals. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the protein sequence of Nudix_N and Nudix_C from Drosophila, and Nudix from other animals. The phylogenetic analysis suggested that the double Nudix domain proteins might have undergone a gene duplication-speciation-fusion process. Secondly,two genes of the MutT family, DR0004 and DR0329, were fused by two mutT gene segments and formed double MutT domain protein genes in Deinococcus radiodurans. The evolutionary tree of bacterial MutT proteins suggested that the double MutT domain proteins in D. radiodurans probably resulted from a gene duplication-fusion event after speciation. Gene duplication-fusion is a basic and important gene innovation mechanism for the evolution of double MutT/Nudix domain proteins. Independent gene duplication-fusion events resulted in similar domain architectures of different double MutT/Nudix domain proteins.     

SLIDE, the Protein Interacting Domain of Imitation Switch Remodelers, Binds DDT-Domain Proteins of Different Subfamilies in Chromatin Remodeling Complexes

The Imitation Switch (ISWI) type adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent chromatin remodeling factors are conserved proteins in eukaryotes, and some of them are known to form stable remodeling complexes...     

Clustering of multi‐domain protein sequences

The overall function of a multi‐domain protein is determined by the functional and structural interplay of its constituent domains. Traditional sequence alignment‐based methods commonly utilize domain‐level information and provide classification only at the level of domains. Such methods are not capable of taking into account the contributions of other domains in the proteins, and domain‐linker regions and classify multi‐domain proteins. An alignment‐free protein sequence comparison tool, CLAP (CLAssification of Proteins) was previously developed in our laboratory to especially handle multi‐domain protein sequences without a requirement of defining domain boundaries and sequential order of domains. Through this method we aim to achieve a biologically meaningful classification scheme for multi‐domain protein sequences. In this article, CLAP‐based classification has been explored on 5 datasets of multi‐domain proteins and we present detailed analysis for proteins containing (1) Tyrosine phosphatase and (2) SH3 domain. At the domain‐level CLAP‐based classification scheme resulted in a clustering similar to that obtained from an alignment‐based method. CLAP‐based clusters obtained for full‐length datasets were shown to comprise of proteins with similar functions and domain architectures. Our study demonstrates that multi‐domain proteins could be classified effectively by considering full‐length sequences without a requirement of identification of domains in the sequence.     

A conserved BURP domain defines a novel group of plant proteins with unusual primary structures

We have identified a new class of plant proteins containing a common C-terminal region, which we have termed the BURP domain. These proteins are defined not only by the BURP domain, but also by the overall similarity in their modular construction. The BURP domain proteins consist of either three or four modules: (i) an N-terminal hydrophobic domain – a presumptive transit peptide, joined to (ii) a short conserved segment or other short segment, (iii) an optional segment consisting of repeated units which is unique to each member, and (iv) the C-terminal BURP domain. These individual modules appear to be combined to form two main classes of BURP domain proteins. The BURP domain proteins, despite the similarities in their primary structural features, show no obvious similarities in the tissues or conditions under which they are expressed. The presence of the conserved BURP domain in diverse plant proteins suggests an important and fundamental functional role for this domain. Received: 30 April 1998 / Accepted: 10 June 1998     

Prediction of protein domain boundaries based on statistics of appearance of amino acid residues

We have created a database of two-domain proteins with homology less than 25% (452 proteins). Based on one half of this set of proteins statistics of appearance of amino acid residues on the domain boundaries of multiple domain proteins has been obtained. Small and hydrophilic amino acids (proline, glycine, asparagine, glutamic acid, arginine and others) appear on the domain boundaries more often than in the whole protein. Opposite, hydrophobic amino acid residues (tryptophane, methionine, phenylalanine and others) appear on the domain boundaries more rarely. The obtained scales of the appearance of amino acid residues on the boundary regions from the statistics have been used for calculation of domain boundaries in the proteins of the second half of the database. The probability scale obtained by averaging the appearance of amino acid residues on the domain boundary region including 8 residues (+/-4 residues from the real domain boundary) gives the best result: for 57% of proteins the predicted boundary was closer than 40 residues to the boundary assigned from three-dimensional structures, for 41% it was closer than 20 residues from the real boundary. The probability scale was used to predict domain boundaries for proteins with unknown three-dimensional structure (international competition CASP6).     

Taxonomic distribution,repeats, and functions of the S1 domain‐containing proteins as members of the OB‐fold family

Proteins of the nucleic acid‐binding proteins superfamily perform such functions as processing, transport, storage, stretching, translation, and degradation of RNA. It is one of the 16 superfamilies containing the OB‐fold in protein structures. Here, we have analyzed the superfamily of nucleic acid‐binding proteins (the number of sequences exceeds 200,000) and obtained that this superfamily prevalently consists of proteins containing the cold shock DNA‐binding domain (ca. 131,000 protein sequences). Proteins containing the S1 domain compose 57% from the cold shock DNA‐binding domain family. Furthermore, we have found that the S1 domain was identified mainly in the bacterial proteins (ca. 83%) compared to the eukaryotic and archaeal proteins, which are available in the UniProt database. We have found that the number of multiple repeats of S1 domain in the S1 domain‐containing proteins depends on the taxonomic affiliation. All archaeal proteins contain one copy of the S1 domain, while the number of repeats in the eukaryotic proteins varies between 1 and 15 and correlates with the protein size. In the bacterial proteins, the number of repeats is no more than 6, regardless of the protein size. The large variation of the repeat number of S1 domain as one of the structural variants of the OB‐fold is a distinctive feature of S1 domain‐containing proteins. Proteins from the other families and superfamilies have either one OB‐fold or change slightly the repeat numbers. On the whole, it can be supposed that the repeat number is a vital for multifunctional activity of the S1 domain‐containing proteins. Proteins 2017; 85:602–613. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

J domain independent functions of J proteins

Heat shock proteins of 40 kDa (Hsp40s), also called J proteins, are obligate partners of Hsp70s. Via their highly conserved and functionally critical J domain, J proteins interact and modulate the activity of their Hsp70 partners. Mutations in the critical residues in the J domain often result in the null phenotype for the J protein in question. However, as more J proteins have been characterized, it is becoming increasingly clear that a significant number of J proteins do not “completely” rely on their J domains to carry out their cellular functions, as previously thought. In some cases, regions outside the highly conserved J domain have become more important making the J domain dispensable for some, if not for all functions of a J protein. This has profound effects on the evolution of such J proteins. Here we present selected examples of J proteins that perform J domain independent functions and discuss this in the context of evolution of J proteins with dispensable J domains and J-like proteins in eukaryotes.     

The ubiquitin-associated domain of hPLIC-2 interacts with the proteasome

The ubiquitin-like hPLIC proteins can associate with proteasomes, and hPLIC overexpression can specifically interfere with ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis (Kleijnen et al., 2000). Because the hPLIC proteins can also interact with certain E3 ubiquitin protein ligases, they may provide a link between the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation machineries. The amino-terminal ubiquitin-like (ubl) domain is a proteasome-binding domain. Herein, we report that there is a second proteasome-binding domain in hPLIC-2: the carboxyl-terminal ubiquitin-associated (uba) domain. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments of wild-type and mutant hPLIC proteins revealed that the ubl and uba domains each contribute independently to hPLIC-2-proteasome binding. There is specificity for the interaction of the hPLIC-2 uba domain with proteasomes, because uba domains from several other proteins failed to bind proteasomes. Furthermore, the binding of uba domains to polyubiquitinated proteins does not seem to be sufficient for the proteasome binding. Finally, the uba domain is necessary for the ability of full-length hPLIC-2 to interfere with the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of p53. The PLIC uba domain has been reported to bind and affect the functions of proteins such as GABAA receptor and presenilins. It is possible that the function of these proteins may be regulated or mediated through proteasomal degradation pathways.     

β-Strand-mediated interactions of protein domains

Protein domains exist by themselves or in combination with other domains to form complex multidomain proteins. Defining domain boundaries in proteins is essential for understanding their evolution and function but is not trivial. More specifically, partitioning domains that interact by forming a single β-sheet is known to be particularly troublesome for automatic structure-based domain decomposition pipelines. Here, we study edge-to-edge β-strand interactions between domains in a protein chain, to help define the boundaries for some more difficult cases where a single β-sheet spanning over two domains gives an appearance of one. We give a number of examples where β-strands belonging to a single β-sheet do not belong to a single domain and highlight the difficulties of automatic domain parsers on these examples. This work can be used as a baseline for defining domain boundaries in homologous proteins or proteins with similar domain interactions in the future.     

Critical role of the pleckstrin homology and cysteine-rich domains in Vav signaling and transforming activity

Vav family proteins are members of the Dbl family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors and activators of Rho family small GTPases. In addition to the Dbl homology (DH) domain important for guanine nucleotide exchange factor catalytic function, all Dbl family proteins contain an adjacent pleckstrin homology (PH) domain that serves to regulate DH domain activity. Although the role of the PH domain in Vav function has been evaluated extensively, its precise role and whether it serves a distinct role in different Vav proteins remain unresolved. Additionally, the precise role of an adjacent cysteine-rich domain (CRD) in regulating DH domain function is also unclear. In this study, we evaluated the contribution of these putative protein-protein or protein-lipid interaction domains to Vav signaling and transforming activity. In contrast to previous observations, we found that the PH domain is critical for Vav transforming activity. Similarly, the CRD was also essential and served a function distinct from that of the PH domain. Although mutation of either domain reduced Vav membrane association, addition of plasma membrane targeting sequences to either the CRD or PH domain mutant proteins did not restore Vav transforming activity. This result contrasts with other Dbl family proteins, where a membrane targeting sequence alone was sufficient to restore the loss of function caused by mutation of the PH domain. Furthermore, green fluorescent protein fusion proteins containing the PH domain or CRD, or both, failed to target to the plasma membrane, suggesting that these two domains also serve regulatory functions independent of promoting membrane localization. Finally, we found that phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation may promote Vav membrane association via phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate binding to the PH domain.     

Structure and function of PICK1

PICK1 is a peripheral membrane protein conserved from Caenorhabditis elegans to the human. It is expressed in many tissues with high levels in brain and testis. Inside cells, PICK1 is localized at the perinuclear region as well as specialized structures such as synapses of neurons. PICK1 contains a PDZ domain and a BAR domain. The PDZ domain of PICK1 binds to a large number of membrane proteins, especially proteins with C-terminal type II PDZ-binding motifs. The BAR domain of PICK1 binds to lipid molecules, mainly phosphoinositides. While the PDZ domain and the linker region of PICK1 enhance BAR domain's lipid binding, the C-terminal region of PICK1 inhibits its lipid binding. PICK1 regulates the subcellular localization and surface expression of its PDZ-binding partners. Lipid binding of PICK1's BAR domain is important for this regulation. With its PDZ domain interacting with membrane proteins and its BAR domain binding to lipids, the unique structure of PICK1 enables it to couple membrane proteins to protein-trafficking machinery.     

Tau-Like Proteins in the Nervous System of Goldfish

This report describes the presence of a group of tau-like proteins (TLPs) in goldfish central nervous system. The TLPs were immunoreactive with antibodies that recognized the carboxy-terminal domain of mammalian tau, but not with antibodies that recognized the amino-terminus. The TLPs of goldfish exhibited the basic properties of tau proteins including neuronal specificity, structural heterogeneity, heat stability and the ability to co-assemble with tubulin. We propose that TLPs may represent a precursor of tau, that share the microtubule binding domain and the carboxy-terminal domain with mammalian tau proteins. In contrast the amino-terminus of the TLPs is much shorter and may represent a more variable domain of tau proteins.     

Flotillins and the PHB domain protein family: rafts, worms and anaesthetics

While our understanding of lipid microdomains has advanced in recent years, many aspects of their formation and dynamics are still unclear. In particular, the molecular determinants that facilitate the partitioning of integral membrane proteins into lipid raft domains are yet to be clarified. This review focuses on a family of raft-associated integral membrane proteins, termed flotillins, which belongs to a larger class of integral membrane proteins that carry an evolutionarily conserved domain called the prohibitin homology (PHB) domain. A number of studies now suggest that eucaryotic proteins carrying this domain have affinity for lipid raft domains. The PHB domain is carried by a diverse array of proteins including stomatin, podocin, the archetypal PHB protein, prohibitin, lower eucaryotic proteins such as the Dictyostelium discoideum proteins vacuolin A and vacuolin B and the Caenorhabditis elegans proteins unc-1, unc-24 and mec-2. The presence of this domain in some procaryotic proteins suggests that the PHB domain may constitute a primordial lipid recognition motif. Recent work has provided new insights into the trafficking and targeting of flotillin and other PHB domain proteins. While the function of this large family of proteins remains unclear, studies of the C. elegans PHB proteins suggest possible links to a class of volatile anaesthetics raising the possibility that these lipophilic agents could influence lipid raft domains. This review will discuss recent insights into the cell biology of flotillins and the large family of evolutionarily conserved PHB domain proteins.     

Functional dissection of the PE domain responsible for translocation of PE_PGRS33 across the mycobacterial cell wall

PE are peculiar exported mycobacterial proteins over-represented in pathogenic mycobacterial species. They are characterized by an N-terminal domain of about 110 amino acids (PE domain) which has been demonstrated to be responsible for their export and localization. In this paper, we characterize the PE domain of PE_PGRS33 (PE(Rv1818c)), one of the best characterized PE proteins. We constructed several mutated proteins in which portions of the PE domain were deleted or subjected to defined mutations. These proteins were expressed in different mycobacterial species and their localization was characterized. We confirmed that the PE domain is essential for PE_PGRS33 surface localization, and demonstrated that a PE domain lacking its first 30 amino acids loses its function. However, single amino acid substitutions in two regions extremely well conserved within the N-terminal domain of all PE proteins had some effect on the stability of PE_PGRS33, but not on its localization. Using Mycobacterium marinum we could show that the type VII secretion system ESX-5 is essential for PE_PGRS33 export. Moreover, in M. marinum, but not in Mycobacterium bovis BCG and in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the PE domain of PE_PGRS33 is processed and secreted into the culture medium when expressed in the absence of the PGRS domain. Finally, using chimeric proteins in which different portions of the PE(Rv1818c) domain were fused to the N-terminus of the green fluorescent protein, we could hypothesize that the first 30 amino acids of the PE domain contain a sequence that allows protein translocation.