Dynamic opening of DNA during the enzymatic search for a damaged base

Uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) removes uracil from U.A or U.G base pairs in genomic DNA by extruding the aberrant uracil from the DNA base stack. A question in enzymatic DNA repair is whether UDG and related glycosylases also use an extrahelical recognition mechanism to inspect the integrity of undamaged base pairs. Using NMR imino proton exchange measurements we find that UDG substantially increases the equilibrium constant for opening of T-A base pairs by almost two orders of magnitude relative to free B-DNA. This increase is brought about by enzymatic stabilization of an open state of the base pair without increasing the rate constant for spontaneous base pair opening. These findings indicate a passive search mechanism in which UDG uses the spontaneous opening dynamics of DNA to inspect normal base pairs in a rapid genome-wide search for uracil in DNA.     

Effect of the thymidylate synthase inhibitors on dUTP and TTP pool levels and the activities of DNA repair glycosylases on uracil and 5-fluorouracil in DNA

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (5-dUrd), and raltitrixed (RTX) are anticancer agents that target thymidylate synthase (TS), thereby blocking the conversion of dUMP into dTMP. In budding yeast, 5-FU promotes a large increase in the dUMP/dTMP ratio leading to massive polymerase-catalyzed incorporation of uracil (U) into genomic DNA, and to a lesser extent 5-FU, which are both excised by yeast uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG), leading to DNA fragmentation and cell death. In contrast, the toxicity of 5-FU and RTX in human and mouse cell lines does not involve UNG, but, instead, other DNA glycosylases that can excise uracil derivatives. To elucidate the basis for these divergent findings in yeast and human cells, we have investigated how these drugs perturb cellular dUTP and TTP pool levels and the relative abilities of three human DNA glycosylases (hUNG2, hSMUG1, and hTDG) to excise various TS drug-induced lesions in DNA. We found that 5-dUrd only modestly increases the dUTP and dTTP pool levels in asynchronous MEF, HeLa, and HT-29 human cell lines when growth occurs in standard culture media. In contrast, treatment of chicken DT40 B cells with 5-dUrd or RTX resulted in large increases in the dUTP/TTP ratio. Surprisingly, even though UNG is the only DNA glycosylase in DT40 cells that can act on U·A base pairs derived from dUTP incorporation, an isogenic ung(-/-) DT40 cell line showed little change in its sensitivity to RTX as compared to control cells. In vitro kinetic analyses of the purified human enzymes show that hUNG2 is the most powerful catalyst for excision of 5-FU and U regardless of whether it is found in base pairs with A or G or present in single-stranded DNA. Fully consistent with the in vitro activity assays, nuclear extracts isolated from human and chicken cell cultures show that hUNG2 is the overwhelming activity for removal of both U and 5-FU, despite its bystander status with respect to drug toxicity in these cell lines. The diverse outcomes of TS inhibition with respect to nucleotide pool levels, the nature of the resulting DNA lesion, and the DNA repair response are discussed.     

Mimicking damaged DNA with a small molecule inhibitor of human UNG2

Human nuclear uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG2) is a cellular DNA repair enzyme that is essential for a number of diverse biological phenomena ranging from antibody diversification to B-cell lymphomas and type-1 human immunodeficiency virus infectivity. During each of these processes, UNG2 recognizes uracilated DNA and excises the uracil base by flipping it into the enzyme active site. We have taken advantage of the extrahelical uracil recognition mechanism to build large small-molecule libraries in which uracil is tethered via flexible alkane linkers to a collection of secondary binding elements. This high-throughput synthesis and screening approach produced two novel uracil-tethered inhibitors of UNG2, the best of which was crystallized with the enzyme. Remarkably, this inhibitor mimics the crucial hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions previously observed in UNG2 complexes with damaged uracilated DNA. Thus, the environment of the binding site selects for library ligands that share these DNA features. This is a general approach to rapid discovery of inhibitors of enzymes that recognize extrahelical damaged bases.     

Nontarget DNA binding shapes the dynamic landscape for enzymatic recognition of DNA damage

The DNA repair enzyme human uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) scans short stretches of genomic DNA and captures rare uracil bases as they transiently emerge from the DNA duplex via spontaneous base pair breathing motions. The process of DNA scanning requires that the enzyme transiently loosen its grip on DNA to allow stochastic movement along the DNA contour, while engaging extrahelical bases requires motions on a more rapid timescale. Here, we use NMR dynamic measurements to show that free UNG has no intrinsic dynamic properties in the millisecond to microsecond and subnanosecond time regimes, and that the act of binding to nontarget DNA reshapes the dynamic landscape to allow productive millisecond motions for scanning and damage recognition. These results suggest that DNA structure and the spontaneous dynamics of base pairs may drive the evolution of a protein sequence that is tuned to respond to this dynamic regime.     

DNA-uracil and human pathology

Uracil is usually an inappropriate base in DNA, but it is also a normal intermediate during somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR) in adaptive immunity. In addition, uracil is introduced into retroviral DNA by the host as part of a defence mechanism. The sources of uracil in DNA are spontaneous or enzymatic deamination of cytosine (U:G mispairs) and incorporation of dUTP (U:A pairs). Uracil in DNA is removed by a uracil-DNA glycosylase. The major ones are nuclear UNG2 and mitochondrial UNG1 encoded by the UNG-gene, and SMUG1 that also removes oxidized pyrimidines, e.g. 5-hydroxymethyluracil. The other ones are TDG that removes U and T from mismatches, and MBD4 that removes U from CpG contexts. UNG2 is found in replication foci during the S-phase and has a distinct role in repair of U:A pairs, but it is also important in U:G repair, a function shared with SMUG1. SHM is initiated by activation-induced cytosine deaminase (AID), followed by removal of U by UNG2. Humans lacking UNG2 suffer from recurrent infections and lymphoid hyperplasia, and have skewed SHM and defective CSR, resulting in elevated IgM and strongly reduced IgG, IgA and IgE. UNG-defective mice also develop B-cell lymphoma late in life. In the defence against retrovirus, e.g. HIV-1, high concentrations of dUTP in the target cells promotes misincorporation of dUMP-, and host cell APOBEC proteins may promote deamination of cytosine in the viral DNA. This facilitates degradation of viral DNA by UNG2 and AP-endonuclease. However, viral proteins Vif and Vpr counteract this defense by mechanisms that are now being revealed. In conclusion, uracil in DNA is both a mutagenic burden and a tool to modify DNA for diversity or degradation.     

Increased uracil insertion in DNA is cytotoxic and increases the frequency of mutation,double strand break formation and VSG switching in Trypanosoma brucei

Deoxyuridine 5′-triphosphate pyrophosphatase (dUTPase) and uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) are key enzymes involved in the control of the presence of uracil in DNA. While dUTPase prevents uracil misincorporation by removing dUTP from the deoxynucleotide pool, UNG excises uracil from DNA as a first step of the base excision repair pathway (BER). Here, we report that strong down-regulation of dUTPase in UNG-deficient Trypanosoma brucei cells greatly impairs cell viability in both bloodstream and procyclic forms, underscoring the extreme sensitivity of trypanosomes to uracil in DNA. Depletion of dUTPase activity in the absence of UNG provoked cell cycle alterations, massive dUTP misincorporation into DNA and chromosomal fragmentation. Overall, trypanosomatid cells that lack dUTPase and UNG activities exhibited greater proliferation defects and DNA damage than cells deficient in only one of these activities. To determine the mutagenic consequences of uracil in DNA, mutation rates and spectra were analyzed in dUTPase-depleted cells in the presence of UNG activity. These cells displayed a spontaneous mutation rate 9-fold higher than the parental cell line. Base substitutions at A:T base pairs and deletion frequencies were both significantly enhanced which is consistent with the generation of mutagenic AP sites and DNA strand breaks. The increase in strand breaks conveyed a concomitant increase in VSG switching in vitro. The low tolerance of T. brucei to uracil in DNA emphasizes the importance of uracil removal and regulation of intracellular dUTP pool levels in cell viability and genetic stability and suggests potential strategies to compromise parasite survival.     

Linear free energy correlations for enzymatic base flipping: how do damaged base pairs facilitate specific recognition?

To efficiently maintain their genomic integrity, DNA repair glycosylases must exhibit high catalytic specificity for their cognate damaged bases using an extrahelical recognition mechanism. One possible contribution to specificity is the weak base pairing and inherent instability of damaged sites which may lead to increased extrahelicity of the damaged base and enhanced recognition of these sites. This model predicts that the binding affinity of the enzyme should increase as the thermodynamic stability of the lesion base pair decreases, because less work is required to extrude the base into its active site. We have tested this hypothesis with uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) by constructing a series of DNA duplexes containing a single uracil (U) opposite a variety of bases (X) that formed from zero to three hydrogen bonds with U. Linear free energy (LFE) relationships were observed that correlated UDG binding affinity with the entropy and enthalpy of duplex melting, and the dynamic accessibility of the damaged site to chemical oxidation. These LFEs indicate that the increased conformational freedom of the damaged site brought about by enthalpic destabilization of the base pair promotes the formation of extrahelical states that enhance specific recognition by as much as 3000-fold. However, given the small stability differences between normal base pairs and U.A or U.G base pairs, relative base pair stability contributes little to the >10(6)-fold discrimination of UDG for uracil sites in cellular DNA. In contrast, the intrinsic instability of other more egregious DNA lesions may contribute significantly to the specificity of other DNA repair enzymes that bind to extrahelical bases.     

Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG)-deficient mice reveal a primary role of the enzyme during DNA replication

Gene-targeted knockout mice have been generated lacking the major uracil-DNA glycosylase, UNG. In contrast to ung- mutants of bacteria and yeast, such mice do not exhibit a greatly increased spontaneous mutation frequency. However, there is only slow removal of uracil from misincorporated dUMP in isolated ung-/- nuclei and an elevated steady-state level of uracil in DNA in dividing ung-/- cells. A backup uracil-excising activity in tissue extracts from ung null mice, with properties indistinguishable from the mammalian SMUG1 DNA glycosylase, may account for the repair of premutagenic U:G mispairs resulting from cytosine deamination in vivo. The nuclear UNG protein has apparently evolved a specialized role in mammalian cells counteracting U:A base pairs formed by use of dUTP during DNA synthesis.     

Defective Repair of Uracil Causes Telomere Defects in Mouse Hematopoietic Cells

Uracil in the genome can result from misincorporation of dUTP instead of dTTP during DNA synthesis, and is primarily removed by uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) during base excision repair. Telomeres contain long arrays of TTAGGG repeats and may be susceptible to uracil misincorporation. Using model telomeric DNA substrates, we showed that the position and number of uracil substitutions of thymine in telomeric DNA decreased recognition by the telomere single-strand binding protein, POT1. In primary mouse hematopoietic cells, uracil was detectable at telomeres, and UNG deficiency further increased uracil loads and led to abnormal telomere lengthening. In UNG-deficient cells, the frequencies of sister chromatid exchange and fragility in telomeres also significantly increased in the absence of telomerase. Thus, accumulation of uracil and/or UNG deficiency interferes with telomere maintenance, thereby underscoring the necessity of UNG-initiated base excision repair for the preservation of telomere integrity.     

A comparative study of uracil-DNA glycosylases from human and herpes simplex virus type 1

Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) is the key enzyme responsible for initiation of base excision repair. We have used both kinetic and binding assays for comparative analysis of UNG enzymes from humans and herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). Steady-state fluorescence assays showed that hUNG has a much higher specificity constant (k(cat)/K(m)) compared with the viral enzyme due to a lower K(m). The binding of UNG to DNA was also studied using a catalytically inactive mutant of UNG and non-cleavable substrate analogs (2'-deoxypseudouridine and 2'-alpha-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine). Equilibrium DNA binding revealed that both human and HSV-1 UNG enzymes bind to abasic DNA and both substrate analogs more weakly than to uracil-containing DNA. Structure determination of HSV-1 D88N/H210N UNG in complex with uracil revealed detailed information on substrate binding. Together, these results suggest that a significant proportion of the binding energy is provided by specific interactions with the target uracil. The kinetic parameters for human UNG indicate that it is likely to have activity against both U.A and U.G mismatches in vivo. Weak binding to abasic DNA also suggests that UNG activity is unlikely to be coupled to the subsequent common steps of base excision repair.     

Uracil incorporation into genomic DNA does not predict toxicity caused by chemotherapeutic inhibition of thymidylate synthase

Thymidylate synthase (TS) is an important target of several chemotherapeutic agents, including 5-FU and raltitrexed (Tomudex). During TS inhibition, TTP levels decrease with a subsequent increase in dUTP. Uracil incorporated into the genome is removed by base excision repair (BER). Thus, BER initiated by uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) activity has been hypothesized to influence the toxicity induced by TS inhibitors. In this study we created a human cell line expressing the Ugi protein inhibitor of UNG family of UDGs, which reduces cellular UDG activity by at least 45-fold. Genomic uracil incorporation was directly measured by mass spectrometry following treatment with TS inhibitors. Genomic uracil levels were increased over 4-fold following TS inhibition in the Ugi-expressing cells, but did not detectably increase in UNG proficient cells. Despite the difference in genomic uracil levels, there was no difference in toxicity between the UNG proficient and UNG-inhibited cells to folate or nucleotide-based inhibitors of TS. Cell cycle analysis showed that UNG proficient and UNG-inhibited cells arrested in early S-phase and resumed replication progression during recovery from RTX treatment almost identically. The induction of gamma-H2AX was measured following TS inhibition as a measure of whether uracil excision promoted DNA double strand break formation during S-phase arrest. Although gamma-H2AX was detectable following TS inhibition, there was no difference between UNG proficient and UNG-inhibited cells. We therefore conclude that uracil excision initiated by UNG does not adequately explain the toxicity caused by TS inhibition in this model.     

The origins of high-affinity enzyme binding to an extrahelical DNA base

Base flipping is a highly conserved strategy used by enzymes to gain catalytic access to DNA bases that would otherwise be sequestered in the duplex structure. A classic example is the DNA repair enzyme uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) which recognizes and excises unwanted uracil bases from DNA using a flipping mechanism. Previous work has suggested that enzymatic base flipping begins with dynamic breathing motions of the enzyme-bound DNA substrate, and then, only very late during the reaction trajectory do strong specific interactions with the extrahelical uracil occur. Here we report that UDG kinetically and thermodynamically prefers substrate sites where the uracil is paired with an unnatural adenine analogue that lacks any Watson-Crick hydrogen-bonding groups. The magnitude of the preference is a striking 43000-fold as compared to an adenine analogue that forms three H-bonds. Transient kinetic and fluorescence measurements suggest that preferential recognition of uracil in the context of a series of incrementally destabilized base pairs arises from two distinct effects: weak or absent hydrogen bonding, which thermodynamically assists extrusion, and, most importantly, increased flexibility of the site which facilitates DNA bending during base flipping. A coupled, stepwise reaction coordinate is implicated in which DNA bending precedes base pair rupture and flipping.     

Repair of U/G and U/A in DNA by UNG2-associated repair complexes takes place predominantly by short-patch repair both in proliferating and growth-arrested cells

Nuclear uracil-DNA glycosylase UNG2 has an established role in repair of U/A pairs resulting from misincorporation of dUMP during replication. In antigen-stimulated B-lymphocytes UNG2 removes uracil from U/G mispairs as part of somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination processes. Using antibodies specific for the N-terminal non-catalytic domain of UNG2, we isolated UNG2-associated repair complexes (UNG2-ARC) that carry out short-patch and long-patch base excision repair (BER). These complexes contain proteins required for both types of BER, including UNG2, APE1, POLbeta, POLdelta, XRCC1, PCNA and DNA ligase, the latter detected as activity. Short-patch repair was the predominant mechanism both in extracts and UNG2-ARC from proliferating and less BER-proficient growth-arrested cells. Repair of U/G mispairs and U/A pairs was completely inhibited by neutralizing UNG-antibodies, but whereas added recombinant SMUG1 could partially restore repair of U/G mispairs, it was unable to restore repair of U/A pairs in UNG2-ARC. Neutralizing antibodies to APE1 and POLbeta, and depletion of XRCC1 strongly reduced short-patch BER, and a fraction of long-patch repair was POLbeta dependent. In conclusion, UNG2 is present in preassembled complexes proficient in BER. Furthermore, UNG2 is the major enzyme initiating BER of deaminated cytosine (U/G), and possibly the sole enzyme initiating BER of misincorporated uracil (U/A).     

Mismatch recognition and uracil excision provide complementary paths to both Ig switching and the A/T-focused phase of somatic mutation

AID-mediated deamination of dC residues within the immunoglobulin locus generates dU:dG lesions whose resolution leads to class-switch recombination and somatic hypermutation. The dU:dG pair is a mismatch and comprises a base foreign to DNA and is, thus, recognized by proteins from both base excision (uracil-DNA glycosylase, UNG) and mismatch recognition (MSH2/MSH6) pathways. Strikingly, while antibody diversification is perturbed by single deficiency in either UNG or MSH2, combined UNG/MSH2 deficiency leads to a total ablation both of switch recombination and of IgV hypermutation at dA:dT pairs. The initiating dU:dG lesions appear not to be recognized and are simply replicated over. The results indicate that the major pathway for switch recombination occurs through uracil excision with mismatch recognition of dU:dG providing a backup; the second phase of hypermutation (essentially introducing mutations solely at dA:dT pairs) is triggered by mismatch recognition of the dU:dG lesion with uracil excision providing a backup.     

A structural determinant in the uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily for the removal of uracil from adenine/uracil base pairs

The uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily consists of several distinct families. Family 2 mismatch-specific uracil DNA glycosylase (MUG) from Escherichia coli is known to exhibit glycosylase activity on three mismatched base pairs, T/U, G/U and C/U. Family 1 uracil N-glycosylase (UNG) from E. coli is an extremely efficient enzyme that can remove uracil from any uracil-containing base pairs including the A/U base pair. Here, we report the identification of an important structural determinant that underlies the functional difference between MUG and UNG. Substitution of a Lys residue at position 68 with Asn in MUG not only accelerates the removal of uracil from mismatched base pairs but also enables the enzyme to gain catalytic activity on A/U base pairs. Binding and kinetic analysis demonstrate that the MUG-K68N substitution results in enhanced ground state binding and transition state interactions. Molecular modeling reveals that MUG-K68N, UNG-N123 and family 5 Thermus thermophiles UDGb-A111N can form bidentate hydrogen bonds with the N3 and O4 moieties of the uracil base. Genetic analysis indicates the gain of function for A/U base pairs allows the MUG-K68N mutant to remove uracil incorporated into the genome during DNA replication. The implications of this study in the origin of life are discussed.     

Structure and specificity of the vertebrate anti-mutator uracil-DNA glycosylase SMUG1

Cytosine deamination is a major promutagenic process, generating G:U mismatches that can cause transition mutations if not repaired. Uracil is also introduced into DNA via nonmutagenic incorporation of dUTP during replication. In bacteria, uracil is excised by uracil-DNA glycosylases (UDG) related to E. coli UNG, and UNG homologs are found in mammals and viruses. Ung knockout mice display no increase in mutation frequency due to a second UDG activity, SMUG1, which is specialized for antimutational uracil excision in mammalian cells. Remarkably, SMUG1 also excises the oxidation-damage product 5-hydroxymethyluracil (HmU), but like UNG is inactive against thymine (5-methyluracil), a chemical substructure of HmU. We have solved the crystal structure of SMUG1 complexed with DNA and base-excision products. This structure indicates a more invasive interaction with dsDNA than observed with other UDGs and reveals an elegant water displacement/replacement mechanism that allows SMUG1 to exclude thymine from its active site while accepting HmU.     

Base-flipping mutations of uracil DNA glycosylase: substrate rescue using a pyrene nucleotide wedge

We recently introduced a new substrate rescue tool for investigating enzymatic base flipping by uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) in which a bulky pyrene nucleotide wedge (Y) was placed opposite a uracil in duplex DNA (i.e., a U/Y pair), thereby preorganizing the target base in an extrahelical conformation [Jiang, Y. L., et al. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 42347-54]. The pyrene wedge completely rescued the large catalytic defects resulting from removal of the natural Leu191 wedge, presumably mimicking the pushing and plugging function of this group. Here we employ the pyrene rescue method in combination with transient kinetic approaches to assess the functional roles of six conserved enzymatic groups of UDG that have been implicated in the "pinch, push, plug, and pull" base-flipping mechanism (see the preceding paper in this issue). We find that a U/Y base pair increases the apparent second-order rate constant for damaged site recognition by L191G pushing mutation by 45-fold as compared to a U/A pair, thereby fully rescuing the kinetic effects of the mutation. Remarkably, the U/Y pair also allows L191G to proceed through the conformational docking step that is severely comprised with the normal U/A substrate, and allows the active site of UDG to clamp around the extrahelical base. Thus, pyrene also fulfills the plugging role of the Leu191 side chain. Preorganization of uracil in an extrahelical conformation by pyrene allows diffusion-controlled damage recognition by all of these base-flipping mutants, and allows the UDG conformational change to proceed as rapidly as the rate of uracil flipping with the natural U/A base pair. Thus, the pyrene wedge substrate allows UDG to recognize uracil by a lock-and-key mechanism, rather than the natural induced-fit mechanism. Unnatural pyrene base pairs may provide a general strategy to promote site-specific targeting of other enzymes that recognize extrahelical bases.