Crystal structure of the crenarchaeal conserved chromatin protein Cren7 and double-stranded DNA complex

Cren7 is a crenarchaeal conserved chromatin protein discovered recently. To explore the mechanism of the DNA packaging in Crenarchaeota, the crystal structure of Cren7–GCGATCGC complex has been determined and refined at 1.6 Å resolution. Cren7 kinks the dsDNA sharply similar to Sul7d, another chromatin protein existing only in Sulfolobales, which reveals that the “bending and unwinding” compacting mechanism is conserved in Crenarchaeota. Significant structural differences are revealed by comparing both protein–dsDNA complexes. The kinked sites on the same dsDNA in the complexes with Sul7d and Cren7 show one base pair shift. For Cren7, fewer charged residues in the β‐barrel structural region bind to DNA, and additionally, the flexible loop L_β3β4 is also involved in the binding. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays indicate that loop L_β3β4 is essential for DNA‐binding of Cren7. These differences provide insight into the functional difference of both chromatin proteins, suggesting that Cren7 may be more regulative than Sul7d in the DNA‐binding affinity by the methylation in the flexible loop L_β3β4 in vivo.     

Architectural roles of Cren7 in folding crenarchaeal chromatin filament

Archaea have evolved various strategies in chromosomal organization. While histone homologues exist in most archaeal phyla, Cren7 is a chromatin protein conserved in the Crenarchaeota. Here, we show that Cren7 preferentially binds DNA with AT‐rich sequences over that with GC‐rich sequences with a binding size of 6~7 bp. Structural studies of Cren7 in complex with either an 18‐bp or a 20‐bp double‐stranded DNA fragment reveal that Cren7 binds to the minor groove of DNA as monomers in a head‐to‐tail manner. The neighboring Cren7 monomers are located on the opposite sides of the DNA duplex, with each introducing a single‐step sharp kink by intercalation of the hydrophobic side chain of Leu28, bending the DNA into an S‐shape conformation. A structural model for the chromatin fiber folded by Cren7 was established and verified by the analysis of cross‐linked Cren7‐DNA complexes by atomic force microscopy. Our results suggest that Cren7 differs significantly from Sul7, another chromatin protein conserved among Sulfolobus species, in both DNA binding and deformation. These data shed significant light on the strategy of chromosomal DNA organization in crenarchaea.     

Structural insights into the interaction of the crenarchaeal chromatin protein Cren7 with DNA

Cren7, a newly found chromatin protein, is highly conserved in the Crenarchaeota. The protein shows higher affinity for double‐stranded DNA than for single‐stranded DNA, constrains negative DNA supercoils in vitro and is associated with genomic DNA in vivo. Here we report the crystal structures of the Cren7 protein from Sulfolobus solfataricus in complex with two DNA sequences. Cren7 binds in the minor groove of DNA and causes a single‐step sharp kink in DNA (～53°) through the intercalation of the hydrophobic side chain of Leu28. Loop β3‐β4 of Cren7 undergoes a significant conformational change upon binding of the protein to DNA, suggesting its critical role in the stabilization of the protein–DNA complex. The roles of DNA‐contacting amino acid residues in stabilizing the Cren7–DNA interaction were examined by mutational analysis. Structural comparison of Cren7‐DNA complexes with Sac7d‐DNA complexes reveals significant differences between the two proteins in DNA binding surface, suggesting that Cren7 and Sul7d serve distinct functions in chromosomal organization.     

Archaea: The Final Frontier of Chromatin

The three domains of life employ various strategies to organize their genomes. Archaea utilize features similar to those found in both eukaryotic and bacterial chromatin to organize their DNA. In this review, we discuss the current state of research regarding the structure–function relationships of several archaeal chromatin proteins (histones, Alba, Cren7, and Sul7d). We address individual structures as well as inferred models for higher-order chromatin formation. Each protein introduces a unique phenotype to chromatin organization, and these structures are put into the context of in vivo and in vitro data. We close by discussing the present gaps in knowledge that are preventing further studies of the organization of archaeal chromatin, on both the organismal and domain level.     

A euryarchaeal histone modulates strand displacement synthesis by replicative DNA polymerases

Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota, the two main lineages of the domain Archaea, encode different chromatin proteins and differ in the use of replicative DNA polymerases. Crenarchaea possess a single family B DNA polymerase (PolB), which is capable of strand displacement modulated by the chromatin proteins Cren7 and Sul7d. Euryarchaea have two distinct replicative DNA polymerases, PolB and PolD, a family D DNA polymerase. Here we characterized the strand displacement activities of PolB and PolD from the hyperthermophilic euryarchaeon Pyrococcus furiosus and investigated the influence of HPfA1, a homolog of eukaryotic histones from P. furiosus, on these activities. We showed that both PolB and PolD were efficient in strand displacement. HPfA1 inhibited DNA strand displacement by both DNA polymerases but exhibited little effect on the displacement of a RNA strand annealed to single-stranded template DNA. This is consistent with the finding that HPfA1 bound more tightly to double-stranded DNA than to a RNA:DNA hybrid. Our results suggest that, although crenarchaea and euryarchaea differ in chromosomal packaging, they share similar mechanisms in modulating strand displacement by DNA polymerases during lagging strand DNA synthesis.     

Archaeal chromatin proteins

Archaea, along with Bacteria and Eukarya, are the three domains of life. In all living cells, chromatin proteins serve a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the structure and function of the genome. An array of small, abundant and basic DNA-binding proteins, considered candidates for chromatin proteins, has been isolated from the Euryarchaeota and the Crenarchaeota, the two major phyla in Archaea. While most euryarchaea encode proteins resembling eukaryotic histones, crenarchaea appear to synthesize a number of unique DNA-binding proteins likely involved in chromosomal organization. Several of these proteins (e.g., archaeal histones, Sac10b homologs, Sul7d, Cren7, CC1, etc.) have been extensively studied. However, whether they are chromatin proteins and how they function in vivo remain to be fully understood. Future investigation of archaeal chromatin proteins will lead to a better understanding of chromosomal organization and gene expression in Archaea and provide valuable information on the evolution of DNA packaging in cellular life.     

Biochemical and structural characterization of Cren7, a novel chromatin protein conserved among Crenarchaea

Archaea contain a variety of chromatin proteins consistent with the evolution of different genome packaging mechanisms. Among the two main kingdoms in the Archaea, Euryarchaeota synthesize histone homologs, whereas Crenarchaeota have not been shown to possess a chromatin protein conserved at the kingdom level. We report the identification of Cren7, a novel family of chromatin proteins highly conserved in the Crenarchaeota. A small, basic, methylated and abundant protein, Cren7 displays a higher affinity for double-stranded DNA than for single-stranded DNA, constrains negative DNA supercoils and is associated with genomic DNA in vivo. The solution structure and DNA-binding surface of Cren7 from the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus were determined by NMR. The protein adopts an SH3-like fold. It interacts with duplex DNA through a β-sheet and a long flexible loop, presumably resulting in DNA distortions through intercalation of conserved hydrophobic residues into the DNA structure. These data suggest that the crenarchaeal kingdom in the Archaea shares a common strategy in chromatin organization.     

Sulfolobus chromatin proteins modulate strand displacement by DNA polymerase B1

Strand displacement by a DNA polymerase serves a key role in Okazaki fragment maturation, which involves displacement of the RNA primer of the preexisting Okazaki fragment into a flap structure, and subsequent flap removal and fragment ligation. We investigated the role of Sulfolobus chromatin proteins Sso7d and Cren7 in strand displacement by DNA polymerase B1 (PolB1) from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. PolB1 showed a robust strand displacement activity and was capable of synthesizing thousands of nucleotides on a DNA-primed 72-nt single-stranded circular DNA template. This activity was inhibited by both Sso7d and Cren7, which limited the flap length to 3–4 nt at saturating concentrations. However, neither protein inhibited RNA displacement on an RNA-primed single-stranded DNA minicircle by PolB1. Strand displacement remained sensitive to modulation by the chromatin proteins when PolB1 was in association with proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Inhibition of DNA instead of RNA strand displacement by the chromatin proteins is consistent with the finding that double-stranded DNA was more efficiently bound and stabilized than an RNA:DNA duplex by these proteins. Our results suggest that Sulfolobus chromatin proteins modulate strand displacement by PolB1, permitting efficient removal of the RNA primer while inhibiting excessive displacement of the newly synthesized DNA strand during Okazaki fragment maturation.     

Transient HMGB protein interactions with B-DNA duplexes and complexes

HMGB proteins are abundant, non-histone proteins in eukaryotic chromatin. HMGB proteins contain one or two conserved “HMG boxes” and can be sequence-specific or nonspecific in their DNA binding. HMGB proteins cause strong DNA bending and bind preferentially to deformed DNAs. We wish to understand how HMGB proteins increase the apparent flexibility of non-distorted B-form DNA. We test the hypothesis that HMGB proteins bind transiently, creating an ensemble of distorted DNAs with rapidly interconverting conformations. We show that binding of B-form DNA by HMGB proteins is both weak and transient under conditions where DNA cyclization is strongly enhanced. We also detect novel complexes in which HMGB proteins simultaneously bind more than one DNA duplex.     

The ATPase activity of MCM2-7 is dispensable for pre-RC assembly but is required for DNA unwinding

Eukaryotes have six minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins that are essential for DNA replication. The contribution of ATPase activity of MCM complexes to their function in replication is poorly understood. We have established a cell-free system competent for replication in which all MCM proteins are supplied by purified recombinant Xenopus MCM complexes. Recombinant MCM2-7 complex was able to assemble onto chromatin, load Cdc45 onto chromatin, and restore DNA replication in MCM-depleted extracts. Using mutational analysis in the Walker A motif of MCM6 and MCM7 of MCM2-7, we show that ATP binding and/or hydrolysis by MCM proteins is dispensable for chromatin loading and pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) assembly, but is required for origin unwinding during DNA replication. Moreover, this ATPase-deficient mutant complex did not support DNA replication in MCM-depleted extracts. Altogether, these results both demonstrate the ability of recombinant MCM proteins to perform all replication roles of MCM complexes, and further support the model that MCM2-7 is the replicative helicase. These data establish that mutations affecting the ATPase activity of the MCM complex uncouple its role in pre-RC assembly from DNA replication.     

A Role for USP7 in DNA Replication

The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex, which plays multiple important roles in DNA replication, is loaded onto chromatin following mitosis, remains on chromatin until the completion of DNA synthesis, and then is unloaded by a poorly defined mechanism that involves the MCM binding protein (MCM-BP). Here we show that MCM-BP directly interacts with the ubiquitin-specific protease USP7, that this interaction occurs predominantly on chromatin, and that MCM-BP can tether USP7 to MCM proteins. Detailed biochemical and structure analyses of the USP7–MCM-BP interaction showed that the ¹⁵⁵PSTS¹⁵⁸ MCM-BP sequence mediates critical interactions with the TRAF domain binding pocket of USP7. Analysis of the effects of USP7 knockout on DNA replication revealed that lack of USP7 results in slowed progression through late S phase without globally affecting the fork rate or origin usage. Lack of USP7 also resulted in increased levels of MCM proteins on chromatin, and investigation of the cause of this increase revealed a defect in the dissociation of MCM proteins from chromatin in mid- to late S phase. This role of USP7 mirrors the previously described role for MCM-BP in MCM complex unloading and suggests that USP7 works with MCM-BP to unload MCM complexes from chromatin at the end of S phase.     

Solution structure of the BRK domains from CHD7

CHD7 is a member of the chromodomain helicase DNA binding domain (CHD) family of ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling enzymes. It is mutated in CHARGE syndrome, a multiple congenital anomaly condition. CHD7 is one of a subset of CHD proteins, unique to metazoans that contain the BRK domain, a protein module also found in the Brahma/BRG1 family of helicases. We describe here the NMR solution structure of the two BRK domains of CHD7. Each domain has a compact betabetaalphabeta fold. The second domain has a C-terminal extension consisting of two additional helices. The structure differs from those of other domains present in chromatin-associated proteins.     

Influence of chromatin and single strand binding proteins on the activity of an archaeal MCM

The mini-chromosome maintenance (MCM) complex is the presumptive replicative helicase in archaea and eukaryotes. In archaea, the MCM is a homo-multimer, in eukaryotes a heterohexamer composed of six related subunits, MCM 2-7. Biochemical studies using naked DNA templates have revealed that archaeal MCMs and a sub-complex of eukaryotic MCM 4, 6 and 7 have 3' to 5' helicase activity. Here, we investigate the influence of the major chromatin proteins, Alba and Sul7d, of Sulfolobus solfataricus (Sso) on the ability of the MCM complex to melt partial duplex DNA substrates. In addition, we test the effect of Sso SSB on MCM activity. We reveal that Alba represents a formidable barrier to MCM activity and further demonstrate that acetylation of Alba alleviates repression of MCM activity.     

Understanding apparent DNA flexibility enhancement by HU and HMGB architectural proteins

Understanding and predicting the mechanical properties of protein/DNA complexes are challenging problems in biophysics. Certain architectural proteins bind DNA without sequence specificity and strongly distort the double helix. These proteins rapidly bind and unbind, seemingly enhancing the flexibility of DNA as measured by cyclization kinetics. The ability of architectural proteins to overcome DNA stiffness has important biological consequences, but the detailed mechanism of apparent DNA flexibility enhancement by these proteins has not been clear. Here, we apply a novel Monte Carlo approach that incorporates the precise effects of protein on DNA structure to interpret new experimental data for the bacterial histone-like HU protein and two eukaryotic high-mobility group class B (HMGB) proteins binding to ∼ 200-bp DNA molecules. These data (experimental measurement of protein-induced increase in DNA cyclization) are compared with simulated cyclization propensities to deduce the global structure and binding characteristics of the closed protein/DNA assemblies. The simulations account for all observed (chain length and concentration dependent) effects of protein on DNA behavior, including how the experimental cyclization maxima, observed at DNA lengths that are not an integral helical repeat, reflect the deformation of DNA by the architectural proteins and how random DNA binding by different proteins enhances DNA cyclization to different levels. This combination of experiment and simulation provides a powerful new approach to resolve a long-standing problem in the biophysics of protein/DNA interactions.     

The bacterial histone-like protein HU specifically recognizes similar structures in all nucleic acids. DNA,RNA, and their hybrids

HU, a major component of the bacterial nucleoid, shares properties with histones, high mobility group proteins (HMGs), and other eukaryotic proteins. HU, which participates in many major pathways of the bacterial cell, binds without sequence specificity to duplex DNA but recognizes with high affinity DNA repair intermediates. Here we demonstrate that HU binds to double-stranded DNA, double-stranded RNA, and linear DNA-RNA duplexes with a similar low affinity. In contrast to this nonspecific binding to total cellular RNA and to supercoiled DNA, HU specifically recognizes defined structures common to both DNA and RNA. In particular HU binds specifically to nicked or gapped DNA-RNA hybrids and to composite RNA molecules such as DsrA, a small non-coding RNA. HU, which modulates DNA architecture, may play additional key functions in the bacterial machinery via its RNA binding capacity. The simple, straightforward structure of its binding domain with two highly flexible beta-ribbon arms and an alpha-helical platform is an alternative model for the elaborate binding domains of the eukaryotic proteins that display dual DNA- and RNA-specific binding capacities.