Strand opening-deficient Escherichia coli RNA polymerase facilitates investigation of closed complexes with promoter DNA: effects of DNA sequence and temperature

Formation of the strand-separated, open complex between RNA polymerase and a promoter involves several intermediates, the first being the closed complex in which the DNA is fully base-paired. This normally short lived complex has been difficult to study. We have used a mutant Escherichia coli RNA polymerase, deficient in promoter DNA melting, and variants of the P(R) promoter of bacteriophage lambda to model the closed complex intermediate at physiologically relevant temperatures. Our results indicate that in the closed complex, RNA polymerase recognizes base pairs as double-stranded DNA even in the region that becomes single-stranded in the open complex. Additionally, a particular base pair in the -35 region engages in an important interaction with the RNA polymerase, and a DNase I-hypersensitive site, pronounced in the promoter DNA of the open complex, was not present. The effect of temperature on closed complex formation was found to be small over the temperature range from 15 to 37 degrees C. This suggests that low temperature complexes of wild type RNA polymerase and promoter DNA may adequately model the closed complex.     

Exploitation of a chemical nuclease to investigate the location and orientation of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase alpha subunit C-terminal domains at simple promoters that are activated by cyclic AMP receptor protein

The C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit (alphaCTD) of bacterial RNA polymerase plays an important role in promoter recognition. It is known that alphaCTD binds to the DNA minor groove at different locations at different promoters via a surface-exposed determinant, the 265 determinant. Here we describe experiments that permit us to determine the location and orientation of binding of alphaCTD at any promoter. In these experiments, a DNA cleavage reagent is attached to specific locations on opposite faces of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit. After incorporation of the tagged alpha subunits into holo-RNA polymerase, patterns of DNA cleavage due to the reagent are determined in open complexes. The locations of DNA cleavage due to the reagent attached at different positions allow the position and orientation of alphaCTD to be deduced. Here we present data from experiments with simple Escherichia coli promoters that are activated by the cyclic AMP receptor protein.     

Interaction of RNA polymerase with promoters from bacteriophage fd.

Replicative form DNA of bacteriophage fd, which had been fragmented with the restriction endonuclease II from Hemophilus parainfluenzae (endo R- HpaII), was reacted with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase; the resulting stable preinitiation complexes were analysed using the filter binding assay followed by gel electrophoresis. At 120mM KCL the first-order rate constants for complex decay were determined to be 10(-2)-10(-6)s-1. The second-order rate constants for complex formation were found to be about 10(6) -10(7) M-1 s-1. From these values association constants for the individual promoters were calculated to be 2 x 10(-8) -2 x 10(-11) M-1. The rate of formation and the stability of promoter complexes was enhanced in superhelical DNA. No evidence was found for stable promoter-specific closed complexes consisting of enzyme and helical DNA. This and the kinetic data suggest that the unwinding of base pairs is already important early in promoter selection, and not only for the formation of the final open complex. The initiation of RNA synthesis form the preinitiation complex was faster than complex dissociation and complex formation for all promoters. Consequently, the initiation efficiency of a promoter is determined by the rate of complex formation, and not by its 'affinity' for the enzyme. No correlation was found between the relative order of the fd promoters for the binding and the dissociation reaction. This is explained by different structural determinants, for the two reactions, which are located in different parts of the promoter DNA.     

Kinetics of RNA polymerase-promoter complex formation: effects of nonspecific DNA-protein interactions.

The rates of formation of RNA polymerase-promoter open complexes at the galactose P2 and lactose UV5 promoters of E. coli were studied using polyacrylamide gels to separate the heparin-resistant complexes from unbound DNA. Both the apparent rate and extent of reaction at these promoters are inhibited at excess RNA polymerase. This inhibition, which can be relieved by the addition of non-promoter DNA, is interpreted to be the result of occlusion of the promoter site by nonspecifically bound polymerase. Additionally, biphasic kinetics are observed at both gal P2 and lac UV5, but not at the PR promoter of phage lambda. This behavior disappears when the concentration of RNA polymerase in the binding reaction is less than that of the promoter fragment. It is proposed that at excess enzyme nonspecifically bound polymerase molecules sliding along the DNA may "bump" closed complexes from the promoter site thereby reducing the rate of open complex formation. Kinetics mechanisms quantifying both the occlusion and bumping phenomena are presented.     

Mutation-induced changes in RNA polymerase-lac ps promoter interactions

A composite rate assay has been applied to investigate the rate and mechanism of formation of open promoter complexes. Seven DNA templates were studied which were related to the lac ps promoter by single base pair changes in the -10 or -35 region of promoter sequence homology. These small changes induce a nearly 3 order of magnitude variation in the rate of open complex formation. This variation persists over a wide range of concentrations of RNA polymerase. Nevertheless, all promoters direct open complex formation which proceeds through a "closed" or A polymerase:DNA complex which dissociates readily. These data, when taken together with our previous results on the lac "spacer" mutations, demonstrate that mutation of the lac ps promoter leads to changes in the rate of open complex formation predicted by the following rule. Changes which substitute a less conserved element of sequence in the -10 and -35 regions, or of length in the spacer, always decrease the rate in this homologous series of promoters.     

Dissection of two hallmarks of the open promoter complex by mutation in an RNA polymerase core subunit

Deletion of 10 evolutionarily conserved amino acids from the beta subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase leads to a mutant enzyme that is unable to efficiently hold onto DNA. Open promoter complexes formed by the mutant enzyme are in rapid equilibrium with closed complexes and, unlike the wild-type complexes, are highly sensitive to the DNA competitor heparin (Martin, E., Sagitov, V., Burova, E., Nikiforov, V., and Goldfarb, A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20175-20180). Here we show that despite this instability, the mutant enzyme forms partially open complexes at temperatures as low as 0 degrees C when the wild-type complex is fully closed. Thus, the two hallmarks of the open promoter complex, the stability toward a challenge with DNA competitors and the sensitivity toward low temperature, can be uncoupled by mutation and may be independent in the wild-type complex. We use the high resolution structure of Thermus aquaticus RNA polymerase core to build a functional model of promoter complex formation that accounts for the observed defects of the E. coli RNA polymerase mutants.     

Recognition sequences of repressor and polymerase in the operators of bacteriophage lambda

Nucleotide sequences in two wild-type and six mutant operators in the DNA of phage λ are compared. Strikingly similar 17 base pair units are found which we identify as the repressor binding sites. Each operator contains multiple repressor binding sites separated by A-T rich spacers. Elements of 2 fold rotational symmetry are present in each of the sites. Superimposed on each operator is an E. coli RNA polymerase recognition site (promoter). Similarities in the sequences of the two λ promoters, a lac promoter, and an E. coli RNA polymerase recognition site in SV40 DNA are noted.